e10vq
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2010
or
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
Commission File Number 1-9861
M&T BANK CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
New York |
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction of
|
|
16-0968385 |
incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer |
|
|
Identification No.) |
|
|
|
One M & T Plaza |
|
|
Buffalo, New York |
|
|
(Address of principal
|
|
14203 |
executive offices)
|
|
(Zip Code) |
(716) 842-5445
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. þ Yes o No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). þ Yes
o No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated
filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
(Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer þ | |
Accelerated filer o | |
Non-accelerated filer o | |
Smaller reporting company o |
|
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act). o Yes þ No
Number of shares of the registrants Common Stock, $0.50 par value, outstanding as of the
close of business on April 23, 2010: 118,865,763 shares.
M&T BANK CORPORATION
FORM 10-Q
For the Quarterly Period Ended March 31, 2010
- 2 -
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements.
M&T BANK CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
Dollars in thousands, except per share |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks |
|
$ |
1,033,269 |
|
|
|
1,226,223 |
|
Interest-bearing deposits at banks |
|
|
121,305 |
|
|
|
133,335 |
|
Federal funds sold |
|
|
10,400 |
|
|
|
20,119 |
|
Trading account |
|
|
403,476 |
|
|
|
386,984 |
|
Investment securities (includes pledged securities that can
be sold or repledged of $1,787,179 at March 31, 2010;
$1,797,701 at December 31, 2009) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available for sale (cost: $6,261,058 at March 31, 2010;
$6,997,009 at December 31, 2009) |
|
|
6,097,266 |
|
|
|
6,704,378 |
|
Held to maturity (fair value: $1,373,672 at March 31, 2010;
$416,483 at December 31, 2009) |
|
|
1,509,805 |
|
|
|
567,607 |
|
Other (fair value: $497,575 at March 31, 2010;
$508,624 at December 31, 2009) |
|
|
497,575 |
|
|
|
508,624 |
|
|
Total investment securities |
|
|
8,104,646 |
|
|
|
7,780,609 |
|
|
Loans and leases |
|
|
51,800,817 |
|
|
|
52,306,457 |
|
Unearned discount |
|
|
(356,776 |
) |
|
|
(369,771 |
) |
Allowance for credit losses |
|
|
(891,265 |
) |
|
|
(878,022 |
) |
|
Loans and leases, net |
|
|
50,552,776 |
|
|
|
51,058,664 |
|
|
Premises and equipment |
|
|
427,883 |
|
|
|
435,845 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
3,524,625 |
|
|
|
3,524,625 |
|
Core deposit and other intangible assets |
|
|
167,545 |
|
|
|
182,418 |
|
Accrued interest and other assets |
|
|
4,093,297 |
|
|
|
4,131,577 |
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
68,439,222 |
|
|
|
68,880,399 |
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest-bearing deposits |
|
$ |
13,622,819 |
|
|
|
13,794,636 |
|
NOW accounts |
|
|
1,312,284 |
|
|
|
1,396,471 |
|
Savings deposits |
|
|
24,867,761 |
|
|
|
23,676,798 |
|
Time deposits |
|
|
6,945,716 |
|
|
|
7,531,495 |
|
Deposits at foreign office |
|
|
789,825 |
|
|
|
1,050,438 |
|
|
Total deposits |
|
|
47,538,405 |
|
|
|
47,449,838 |
|
|
Federal funds purchased and agreements
to repurchase securities |
|
|
1,740,059 |
|
|
|
2,211,692 |
|
Other short-term borrowings |
|
|
130,704 |
|
|
|
230,890 |
|
Accrued interest and other liabilities |
|
|
1,048,473 |
|
|
|
995,056 |
|
Long-term borrowings |
|
|
10,065,894 |
|
|
|
10,240,016 |
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
60,523,535 |
|
|
|
61,127,492 |
|
|
Stockholders
equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $1.00 par, 1,000,000 shares authorized,
778,000 shares issued and outstanding (liquidation preference
$1,000 per share) |
|
|
732,769 |
|
|
|
730,235 |
|
Common stock, $.50 par, 250,000,000 shares authorized,
120,396,611 shares issued |
|
|
60,198 |
|
|
|
60,198 |
|
Common stock issuable, 70,274 shares at March 31, 2010;
75,170 shares at December 31, 2009 |
|
|
4,073 |
|
|
|
4,342 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
2,411,402 |
|
|
|
2,442,947 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
5,131,600 |
|
|
|
5,076,884 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net |
|
|
(255,181 |
) |
|
|
(335,997 |
) |
Treasury stock common, at cost - 1,643,972 shares at
March 31, 2010; 2,173,916 shares at December 31, 2009 |
|
|
(169,174 |
) |
|
|
(225,702 |
) |
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
7,915,687 |
|
|
|
7,752,907 |
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
68,439,222 |
|
|
|
68,880,399 |
|
|
- 3 -
M&T BANK CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31 |
In thousands, except per share |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Interest income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans and leases, including fees |
|
$ |
588,127 |
|
|
|
554,329 |
|
Deposits at banks |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
Federal funds sold |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
Agreements to resell securities |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
Trading account |
|
|
83 |
|
|
|
121 |
|
Investment securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fully taxable |
|
|
85,647 |
|
|
|
98,467 |
|
Exempt from federal taxes |
|
|
2,510 |
|
|
|
1,529 |
|
|
Total interest income |
|
|
676,386 |
|
|
|
654,512 |
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOW accounts |
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
327 |
|
Savings deposits |
|
|
20,449 |
|
|
|
41,922 |
|
Time deposits |
|
|
29,446 |
|
|
|
60,329 |
|
Deposits at foreign office |
|
|
325 |
|
|
|
981 |
|
Short-term borrowings |
|
|
887 |
|
|
|
2,348 |
|
Long-term borrowings |
|
|
68,745 |
|
|
|
100,798 |
|
|
Total interest expense |
|
|
120,052 |
|
|
|
206,705 |
|
|
Net interest income |
|
|
556,334 |
|
|
|
447,807 |
|
Provision for credit losses |
|
|
105,000 |
|
|
|
158,000 |
|
|
Net interest income after provision for credit losses |
|
|
451,334 |
|
|
|
289,807 |
|
|
Other income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage banking revenues |
|
|
41,476 |
|
|
|
56,233 |
|
Service charges on deposit accounts |
|
|
120,295 |
|
|
|
101,029 |
|
Trust income |
|
|
30,928 |
|
|
|
34,880 |
|
Brokerage services income |
|
|
13,106 |
|
|
|
15,393 |
|
Trading account and foreign exchange gains |
|
|
4,699 |
|
|
|
1,435 |
|
Gain on bank investment securities |
|
|
459 |
|
|
|
575 |
|
Total other-than-temporary impairment (OTTI) losses |
|
|
(29,487 |
) |
|
|
(62,808 |
) |
Portion of OTTI losses recognized in other
comprehensive income (before taxes) |
|
|
2,685 |
|
|
|
30,609 |
|
|
Net OTTI losses recognized in earnings |
|
|
(26,802 |
) |
|
|
(32,199 |
) |
|
Equity in earnings of Bayview Lending Group LLC |
|
|
(5,714 |
) |
|
|
(4,144 |
) |
Other revenues from operations |
|
|
79,259 |
|
|
|
59,139 |
|
|
Total other income |
|
|
257,706 |
|
|
|
232,341 |
|
|
Other expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries and employee benefits |
|
|
264,046 |
|
|
|
249,392 |
|
Equipment and net occupancy |
|
|
55,401 |
|
|
|
48,172 |
|
Printing, postage and supplies |
|
|
9,043 |
|
|
|
9,095 |
|
Amortization of core deposit and other intangible assets |
|
|
16,475 |
|
|
|
15,370 |
|
FDIC assessments |
|
|
21,348 |
|
|
|
5,856 |
|
Other costs of operations |
|
|
123,049 |
|
|
|
110,461 |
|
|
Total other expense |
|
|
489,362 |
|
|
|
438,346 |
|
|
Income before taxes |
|
|
219,678 |
|
|
|
83,802 |
|
Income taxes |
|
|
68,723 |
|
|
|
19,581 |
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
150,955 |
|
|
|
64,221 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income available to common equity |
|
$ |
138,341 |
|
|
|
55,322 |
|
|
Net income per common share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
1.16 |
|
|
|
.49 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
1.15 |
|
|
|
.49 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends per common share |
|
$ |
.70 |
|
|
|
.70 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average common shares outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
117,765 |
|
|
|
110,439 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
118,256 |
|
|
|
110,439 |
|
- 4 -
M&T BANK CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31 |
In thousands |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Cash flows from operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
150,955 |
|
|
|
64,221 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash
provided by operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for credit losses |
|
|
105,000 |
|
|
|
158,000 |
|
Depreciation and amortization of premises and equipment |
|
|
17,207 |
|
|
|
13,038 |
|
Amortization of capitalized servicing rights |
|
|
14,645 |
|
|
|
15,954 |
|
Amortization of core deposit and other intangible assets |
|
|
16,475 |
|
|
|
15,370 |
|
Provision for deferred income taxes |
|
|
(10,163 |
) |
|
|
(11,948 |
) |
Asset write-downs |
|
|
27,821 |
|
|
|
34,063 |
|
Net (gain) loss on sales of assets |
|
|
1,461 |
|
|
|
(447 |
) |
Net change in accrued interest receivable, payable |
|
|
98 |
|
|
|
12,423 |
|
Net change in other accrued income and expense |
|
|
80,537 |
|
|
|
36,624 |
|
Net change in loans originated for sale |
|
|
252,227 |
|
|
|
(263,004 |
) |
Net change in trading account assets and liabilities |
|
|
(2,664 |
) |
|
|
311 |
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
653,599 |
|
|
|
74,605 |
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sales of investment securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available for sale |
|
|
14,759 |
|
|
|
5,550 |
|
Other |
|
|
11,478 |
|
|
|
23,895 |
|
Proceeds from maturities of investment securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available for sale |
|
|
369,136 |
|
|
|
496,247 |
|
Held to maturity |
|
|
29,828 |
|
|
|
28,125 |
|
Purchases of investment securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available for sale |
|
|
(34,084 |
) |
|
|
(21,702 |
) |
Held to maturity |
|
|
(969,953 |
) |
|
|
(8,299 |
) |
Other |
|
|
(428 |
) |
|
|
(619 |
) |
Net decrease in loans and leases |
|
|
546,709 |
|
|
|
84,162 |
|
Other investments, net |
|
|
(6,198 |
) |
|
|
(5,786 |
) |
Additions to capitalized servicing rights |
|
|
(57 |
) |
|
|
(289 |
) |
Capital expenditures, net |
|
|
(10,570 |
) |
|
|
(10,250 |
) |
Other, net |
|
|
1,725 |
|
|
|
(12,772 |
) |
|
Net cash provided (used) by investing activities |
|
|
(47,655 |
) |
|
|
578,262 |
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in deposits |
|
|
93,998 |
|
|
|
(103,205 |
) |
Net decrease in short-term borrowings |
|
|
(571,827 |
) |
|
|
(367,924 |
) |
Payments on long-term borrowings |
|
|
(252,880 |
) |
|
|
(520,549 |
) |
Dividends paid common |
|
|
(83,303 |
) |
|
|
(77,744 |
) |
Dividends paid preferred |
|
|
(10,056 |
) |
|
|
(4,333 |
) |
Other, net |
|
|
15,451 |
|
|
|
6,382 |
|
|
Net cash used by financing activities |
|
|
(808,617 |
) |
|
|
(1,067,373 |
) |
|
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(202,673 |
) |
|
|
(414,506 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
1,246,342 |
|
|
|
1,568,151 |
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
1,043,669 |
|
|
|
1,153,645 |
|
|
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest received during the period |
|
$ |
684,212 |
|
|
|
679,531 |
|
Interest paid during the period |
|
|
121,445 |
|
|
|
206,417 |
|
Income taxes paid (refunded) during the period |
|
|
14,250 |
|
|
|
(67,722 |
) |
|
Supplemental
schedule of noncash investing and financing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate acquired in settlement of loans |
|
$ |
20,749 |
|
|
|
16,545 |
|
Securitization of residential mortgage loans allocated to |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available for sale investment securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
140,942 |
|
Capitalized servicing rights |
|
|
|
|
|
|
788 |
|
Increase (decrease) from consolidation of securitization trusts: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans |
|
|
423,865 |
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities available for sale |
|
|
(360,471 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Long-term borrowings |
|
|
65,419 |
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued interest and other |
|
|
2,025 |
|
|
|
|
|
- 5 -
M&T BANK CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common |
|
|
Additional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
comprehensive |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred |
|
|
Common |
|
|
stock |
|
|
paid-in |
|
|
Retained |
|
|
income |
|
|
Treasury |
|
|
|
|
In thousands, except per share |
|
stock |
|
|
stock |
|
|
issuable |
|
|
capital |
|
|
earnings |
|
|
(loss), net |
|
|
stock |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Balance-January 1, 2009 |
|
$ |
567,463 |
|
|
|
60,198 |
|
|
|
4,617 |
|
|
|
2,897,907 |
|
|
|
5,062,754 |
|
|
|
(736,881 |
) |
|
|
(1,071,327 |
) |
|
|
6,784,731 |
|
Comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
64,221 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
64,221 |
|
Other comprehensive income, net of tax
and reclassification adjustments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gains on investment securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110,839 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110,839 |
|
Defined benefit plans liability adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
472 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
472 |
|
Unrealized losses on terminated cash flow hedges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,161 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,161 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
178,693 |
|
Preferred stock cash dividends |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,333 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,333 |
) |
Amortization of preferred stock discount |
|
|
821 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(821 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation plans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(50,437 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
72,160 |
|
|
|
21,723 |
|
Exercises of stock options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,568 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
360 |
|
|
|
(1,208 |
) |
Directors stock plan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(278 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
600 |
|
|
|
322 |
|
Deferred compensation plans, net,
including dividend equivalents |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(429 |
) |
|
|
(497 |
) |
|
|
(50 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,025 |
|
|
|
49 |
|
Common stock cash dividends $0.70 per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(78,138 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(78,138 |
) |
|
Balance -March 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
568,284 |
|
|
|
60,198 |
|
|
|
4,188 |
|
|
|
2,845,127 |
|
|
|
5,043,633 |
|
|
|
(622,409 |
) |
|
|
(997,182 |
) |
|
|
6,901,839 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance-January 1, 2010 |
|
$ |
730,235 |
|
|
|
60,198 |
|
|
|
4,342 |
|
|
|
2,442,947 |
|
|
|
5,076,884 |
|
|
|
(335,997 |
) |
|
|
(225,702 |
) |
|
|
7,752,907 |
|
Comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
150,955 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
150,955 |
|
Other comprehensive income, net of tax
and reclassification adjustments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gains on investment securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
79,856 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
79,856 |
|
Defined benefit plans liability adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,030 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,030 |
|
Unrealized gain on terminated cash flow hedge |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(70 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(70 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
231,771 |
|
Preferred stock cash dividends |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,056 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,056 |
) |
Amortization of preferred stock discount |
|
|
2,534 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,534 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repayment of management stock ownership
program receivable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
155 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
155 |
|
Stock-based compensation plans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(23,297 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43,138 |
|
|
|
19,841 |
|
Exercises of stock options and vesting of
restricted stock awards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,471 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,973 |
|
|
|
4,502 |
|
Directors stock plan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(145 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
408 |
|
|
|
263 |
|
Deferred compensation plans, net,
including dividend equivalents |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(269 |
) |
|
|
(258 |
) |
|
|
(48 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
525 |
|
|
|
(50 |
) |
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
471 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(516 |
) |
|
|
(45 |
) |
Common stock cash dividends $0.70 per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(83,601 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(83,601 |
) |
|
Balance -March 31, 2010 |
|
$ |
732,769 |
|
|
|
60,198 |
|
|
|
4,073 |
|
|
|
2,411,402 |
|
|
|
5,131,600 |
|
|
|
(255,181 |
) |
|
|
(169,174 |
) |
|
|
7,915,687 |
|
|
CONSOLIDATED SUMMARY OF CHANGES IN ALLOWANCE FOR CREDIT LOSSES
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31 |
In thousands |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Beginning balance |
|
$ |
878,022 |
|
|
|
787,904 |
|
Provision for credit losses |
|
|
105,000 |
|
|
|
158,000 |
|
Consolidation of loan securitization trusts |
|
|
2,752 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net charge-offs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charge-offs |
|
|
(106,039 |
) |
|
|
(110,605 |
) |
Recoveries |
|
|
11,530 |
|
|
|
10,672 |
|
|
Total net charge-offs |
|
|
(94,509 |
) |
|
|
(99,933 |
) |
|
Ending balance |
|
$ |
891,265 |
|
|
|
845,971 |
|
|
- 6 -
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. Significant accounting policies
The consolidated financial statements of M&T Bank Corporation (M&T) and subsidiaries (the
Company) were compiled in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) using
the accounting policies set forth in note 1 of Notes to Financial Statements included in the 2009
Annual Report, except as described below. In the opinion of management, all adjustments necessary
for a fair presentation have been made and were all of a normal recurring nature.
2. Acquisitions
On August 28, 2009, M&T Bank, M&Ts principal banking subsidiary, entered into a purchase and
assumption agreement with the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) to assume all of the
deposits and acquire certain assets of Bradford Bank (Bradford), Baltimore, Maryland. As part of
the transaction, M&T Bank entered into a loss-share arrangement with the FDIC whereby M&T Bank will
be reimbursed by the FDIC for most losses it incurs on the acquired loan portfolio. The
transaction has been accounted for using the acquisition method of accounting and, accordingly,
assets acquired and liabilities assumed were recorded at estimated fair value on the acquisition
date. Assets acquired totaled approximately $469 million, including $302 million of loans, and
liabilities assumed aggregated $440 million, including $361 million of deposits. In accordance
with GAAP, M&T Bank recorded an after-tax gain on the transaction of $18 million ($29 million
before taxes) during the third quarter of 2009. There was no goodwill or other intangible assets
recorded in connection with this transaction. The Bradford acquisition transaction did not have a
material impact on the Companys consolidated statement of position or results of operations.
On May 23, 2009, M&T acquired all of the outstanding common stock of Provident Bankshares
Corporation (Provident), a bank holding company based in Baltimore, Maryland, in a
stock-for-stock transaction. Provident Bank, Providents banking subsidiary, was merged into M&T
Bank on that date. The results of operations acquired in the Provident transaction have been
included in the Companys financial results since May 23, 2009. Provident common shareholders
received .171625 shares of M&T common stock in exchange for each share of Provident common stock,
resulting in M&T issuing a total of 5,838,308 common shares with an acquisition date fair value of
$273 million. In addition, based on the merger agreement, outstanding and unexercised options to
purchase Provident common stock were converted into options to purchase the common stock of M&T.
Those options had an estimated fair value of $1 million. In total, the purchase price was
approximately $274 million based on the fair value on the acquisition date of M&T common stock
exchanged and the options to purchase M&T common stock. Holders of Providents preferred stock
were issued shares of new Series B and Series C Preferred Stock of M&T having substantially
identical terms. That preferred stock and warrants to purchase common stock associated with the
Series C Preferred Stock added $162 million to M&Ts stockholders equity.
The Provident transaction has been accounted for using the acquisition method of accounting and,
accordingly, assets acquired, liabilities assumed and consideration exchanged were recorded at
estimated fair value on the acquisition date. Assets acquired totaled $6.3 billion, including $4.0
billion of loans and leases (including approximately $1.7 billion of commercial real estate loans,
$1.4 billion of consumer loans, $700 million of commercial loans and leases and $300 million of
residential real estate loans) and $1.0 billion of investment securities. Liabilities assumed were
$5.9 billion, including $5.1 billion of deposits. The transaction added $436 million to M&Ts
stockholders equity, including $280 million of common equity and $156 million of preferred equity.
In connection with the acquisition, the Company recorded $332 million of goodwill and $63 million
of core deposit intangible. The core deposit intangible is being amortized over seven years using
an accelerated method. The acquisition of
- 7 -
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED
2. Acquisitions, continued
Provident expanded the Companys presence in the Mid-Atlantic area, gave the Company the second
largest deposit share in Maryland, and tripled the Companys presence in Virginia.
In many cases, determining the fair value of the acquired assets and assumed liabilities
required the Company to estimate cash flows expected to result from those assets and liabilities
and to discount those cash flows at appropriate rates of interest. The most significant of these
determinations related to the fair valuation of acquired loans. For such loans, the excess of cash
flows expected at acquisition over the estimated fair value is recognized as interest income over
the remaining lives of the loans. The difference between contractually required payments at
acquisition and the cash flows expected to be collected at acquisition reflects the impact of
estimated credit losses and other factors, such as prepayments. In accordance with GAAP, there was
no carry over of Providents previously established allowance for credit losses. Subsequent
decreases in the expected cash flows will require the Company to evaluate the need for additions to
the Companys allowance for credit losses. Subsequent improvements in expected cash flows will
result in the recognition of additional interest income over the then remaining lives of the loans.
In conjunction with the Provident acquisition, the acquired loan portfolio was accounted for
at fair value as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 23, 2009 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Contractually required principal
and interest at acquisition |
|
$ |
5,465,167 |
|
Contractual cash flows not
expected to be collected |
|
|
(832,115 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Expected cash flows at acquisition |
|
|
4,633,052 |
|
Interest component of
expected cash flows |
|
|
(595,685 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Basis in acquired loans at
acquisition estimated fair value |
|
$ |
4,037,367 |
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income on acquired loans for the first quarter of 2010 was approximately $39 million.
The outstanding principal balance and the carrying amount of these loans that is included in the
consolidated balance sheet at March 31, 2010 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
Outstanding principal balance |
|
$ |
3,729,361 |
|
Carrying amount |
|
|
3,508,231 |
|
Receivables (including loans and investment securities) obtained in the acquisition of
Provident for which there was specific evidence of credit deterioration as of the acquisition date
and for which it was probable that the Company would be unable to collect all contractually
required principal and interest payments represent less than .25% of the Companys assets and,
accordingly, are not considered material.
- 8 -
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED
2. Acquisitions, continued
The following table presents certain pro forma information for the quarter ended March 31,
2009 as if Provident had been acquired on January 1, 2009. These results combine the historical
results of Provident into the Companys consolidated statement of income and, while certain
adjustments were made for the estimated impact of certain fair valuation adjustments and other
acquisition-related activity, they are not indicative of what would have occurred had the
acquisition taken place on January 1, 2009. In particular, no adjustments have been made to
eliminate the amount of Providents provision for credit losses of $36 million in the quarter ended
March 31, 2009 or the impact of other-than-temporary impairment losses recognized by Provident of
$87 million in the quarter ended March 31, 2009 that would not have been necessary had the acquired
loans and investment securities been recorded at fair value as of the beginning of 2009.
Furthermore, expenses related to systems conversions and other costs of integration are only
included to the extent they were incurred during the first quarter of 2009.
Additionally, the Company expects to achieve further operating cost savings and other business
synergies as a result of the acquisition which are not reflected in the pro forma amounts that
follow.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma |
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Total revenues |
|
$ |
886,968 |
|
|
Net income |
|
|
(8,498 |
) |
|
Merger-related expenses associated with the then pending acquisition of Provident for systems
conversions and other costs of integrating and conforming acquired
operations with and into the
Company were $2 million during the three-month period ended March 31, 2009. There were no similar
expenses in 2010s initial quarter.
- 9 -
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED
3. Investment securities
The amortized cost and estimated fair value of investment securities were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
unrealized |
|
|
unrealized |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
|
cost |
|
|
gains |
|
|
losses |
|
|
fair value |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities available
for sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury and federal agencies |
|
$ |
98,431 |
|
|
|
1,713 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
$ |
100,105 |
|
Obligations of states and political
subdivisions |
|
|
70,888 |
|
|
|
922 |
|
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
71,720 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Government issued or guaranteed |
|
|
3,545,040 |
|
|
|
145,435 |
|
|
|
1,565 |
|
|
|
3,688,910 |
|
Privately issued residential |
|
|
1,958,635 |
|
|
|
11,111 |
|
|
|
305,405 |
|
|
|
1,664,341 |
|
Privately issued commercial |
|
|
31,356 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,231 |
|
|
|
25,125 |
|
Collateralized debt obligations |
|
|
102,282 |
|
|
|
32,241 |
|
|
|
8,768 |
|
|
|
125,755 |
|
Other debt securities |
|
|
310,996 |
|
|
|
22,965 |
|
|
|
48,270 |
|
|
|
285,691 |
|
Equity securities |
|
|
143,430 |
|
|
|
6,685 |
|
|
|
14,496 |
|
|
|
135,619 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,261,058 |
|
|
|
221,072 |
|
|
|
384,864 |
|
|
|
6,097,266 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities held
to maturity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obligations of states and political
subdivisions |
|
|
205,054 |
|
|
|
1,448 |
|
|
|
1,457 |
|
|
|
205,045 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Government issued or guaranteed |
|
|
951,007 |
|
|
|
2,439 |
|
|
|
1,121 |
|
|
|
952,325 |
|
Privately issued mortgage-backed
securities |
|
|
341,618 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
137,442 |
|
|
|
204,176 |
|
Other debt securities |
|
|
12,126 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,126 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,509,805 |
|
|
|
3,887 |
|
|
|
140,020 |
|
|
|
1,373,672 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other securities |
|
|
497,575 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
497,575 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
8,268,438 |
|
|
|
224,959 |
|
|
|
524,884 |
|
|
$ |
7,968,513 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities available
for sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury and federal agencies |
|
$ |
102,755 |
|
|
|
1,988 |
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
$ |
104,686 |
|
Obligations of states and political
subdivisions |
|
|
61,468 |
|
|
|
1,583 |
|
|
|
128 |
|
|
|
62,923 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Government issued or guaranteed |
|
|
3,777,642 |
|
|
|
131,407 |
|
|
|
6,767 |
|
|
|
3,902,282 |
|
Privately issued residential |
|
|
2,438,353 |
|
|
|
9,630 |
|
|
|
383,079 |
|
|
|
2,064,904 |
|
Privately issued commercial |
|
|
33,133 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,967 |
|
|
|
25,166 |
|
Collateralized debt obligations |
|
|
103,159 |
|
|
|
23,389 |
|
|
|
11,202 |
|
|
|
115,346 |
|
Other debt securities |
|
|
309,514 |
|
|
|
16,851 |
|
|
|
58,164 |
|
|
|
268,201 |
|
Equity securities |
|
|
170,985 |
|
|
|
5,590 |
|
|
|
15,705 |
|
|
|
160,870 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,997,009 |
|
|
|
190,438 |
|
|
|
483,069 |
|
|
|
6,704,378 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities held
to maturity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obligations of states and political
subdivisions |
|
|
203,825 |
|
|
|
1,419 |
|
|
|
1,550 |
|
|
|
203,694 |
|
Privately issued
mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
352,195 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
150,993 |
|
|
|
201,202 |
|
Other debt securities |
|
|
11,587 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,587 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
567,607 |
|
|
|
1,419 |
|
|
|
152,543 |
|
|
|
416,483 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other securities |
|
|
508,624 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
508,624 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
8,073,240 |
|
|
|
191,857 |
|
|
|
635,612 |
|
|
$ |
7,629,485 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- 10 -
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED
3. Investment securities, continued
Gross realized gains on investment securities were $1.2 million and $854 thousand for the
quarters ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Gross realized losses on investment
securities were $777 thousand and $279 thousand for the quarters ended March 31, 2010 and 2009,
respectively. The Company recognized $27 million (pre-tax) of other-than-temporary impairment
losses during the quarter ended March 31, 2010 related to twenty privately issued residential
mortgage-backed securities with an amortized cost basis (before impairment charge) of $423 million.
The impairment charges were recognized in light of deterioration of housing values in the
residential real estate market and continued high levels of delinquencies and charge-offs of
underlying mortgage loans collateralizing these securities. The other-than-temporary impairment
losses recognized
in the consolidated statement of income
were net of $3 million (pre-tax) of unrealized losses classified in accumulated
other comprehensive income for the same securities. The $27 million loss represents managements
estimate of credit losses inherent in the securities considering projected cash flows using
assumptions of delinquency rates, loss severities, and other estimates of future collateral
performance. During the first quarter of 2009, the Company recognized $32 million (pre-tax) of
other-than-temporary impairment losses related to seven privately issued residential
mortgage-backed securities with a cost basis of $91 million. The following table displays changes
in credit losses for debt securities recognized in earnings for the quarters ended March 31, 2010
and March 31, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Beginning balance |
|
$ |
284,513 |
|
|
|
155,967 |
|
Additions for credit losses
not previously recognized |
|
|
26,802 |
|
|
|
32,199 |
|
Reductions for increases in
cash flows |
|
|
(169 |
) |
|
|
(548 |
) |
Reductions for realized losses |
|
|
(3,129 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance |
|
$ |
308,017 |
|
|
|
187,618 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At March 31, 2010, the amortized cost and estimated fair value of debt securities by
contractual maturity were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
|
cost |
|
|
fair value |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Debt securities available for sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due in one year or less |
|
$ |
73,255 |
|
|
|
73,970 |
|
Due after one year through five years |
|
|
58,498 |
|
|
|
60,176 |
|
Due after five years through ten years |
|
|
33,697 |
|
|
|
35,292 |
|
Due after ten years |
|
|
417,147 |
|
|
|
413,833 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
582,597 |
|
|
|
583,271 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities available
for sale |
|
|
5,535,031 |
|
|
|
5,378,376 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
6,117,628 |
|
|
|
5,961,647 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt securities held to maturity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due in one year or less |
|
$ |
38,355 |
|
|
|
38,581 |
|
Due after one year through five years |
|
|
8,394 |
|
|
|
8,752 |
|
Due after five years through ten years |
|
|
123,439 |
|
|
|
123,181 |
|
Due after ten years |
|
|
46,992 |
|
|
|
46,657 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
217,180 |
|
|
|
217,171 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities held
to maturity |
|
|
1,292,625 |
|
|
|
1,156,501 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,509,805 |
|
|
|
1,373,672 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- 11 -
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED
3. Investment securities, continued
A summary of investment securities that as of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 had been in
a continuous unrealized loss position for less than twelve months and those that had been in a
continuous unrealized loss position for twelve months or longer follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than 12 months |
|
|
12 months or more |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
Fair value |
|
|
losses |
|
|
Fair value |
|
|
losses |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury and federal agencies |
|
$ |
3,881 |
|
|
|
(36 |
) |
|
|
573 |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
Obligations of states and political
subdivisions |
|
|
134,590 |
|
|
|
(1,447 |
) |
|
|
3,977 |
|
|
|
(100 |
) |
Mortgage-backed securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Government issued or guaranteed |
|
|
829,778 |
|
|
|
(2,653 |
) |
|
|
5,620 |
|
|
|
(33 |
) |
Privately issued residential |
|
|
75,195 |
|
|
|
(1,900 |
) |
|
|
1,500,335 |
|
|
|
(440,947 |
) |
Privately issued commercial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,125 |
|
|
|
(6,231 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collateralized debt obligations |
|
|
12,199 |
|
|
|
(8,419 |
) |
|
|
3,669 |
|
|
|
(349 |
) |
Other debt securities |
|
|
1,763 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
102,428 |
|
|
|
(48,268 |
) |
Equity securities |
|
|
4,900 |
|
|
|
(1,561 |
) |
|
|
7,037 |
|
|
|
(12,935 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,062,306 |
|
|
|
(16,018 |
) |
|
|
1,648,764 |
|
|
|
(508,866 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than 12 months |
|
|
12 months or more |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
Fair value |
|
|
losses |
|
|
Fair value |
|
|
losses |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury and federal agencies |
|
$ |
6,265 |
|
|
|
(53 |
) |
|
|
572 |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
Obligations of states and political
subdivisions |
|
|
145,572 |
|
|
|
(1,575 |
) |
|
|
4,204 |
|
|
|
(103 |
) |
Mortgage-backed securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Government issued or guaranteed |
|
|
685,319 |
|
|
|
(6,460 |
) |
|
|
19,379 |
|
|
|
(307 |
) |
Privately issued residential |
|
|
98,312 |
|
|
|
(2,871 |
) |
|
|
1,705,222 |
|
|
|
(531,201 |
) |
Privately issued commercial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,166 |
|
|
|
(7,967 |
) |
Collateralized debt obligations |
|
|
13,046 |
|
|
|
(10,218 |
) |
|
|
3,598 |
|
|
|
(984 |
) |
Other debt securities |
|
|
5,786 |
|
|
|
(174 |
) |
|
|
138,705 |
|
|
|
(57,990 |
) |
Equity securities |
|
|
7,449 |
|
|
|
(1,728 |
) |
|
|
23,159 |
|
|
|
(13,977 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
961,749 |
|
|
|
(23,079 |
) |
|
|
1,920,005 |
|
|
|
(612,533 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company owned 748 individual investment securities with aggregate gross
unrealized losses of $525 million at March 31, 2010. Approximately $443 million of the unrealized
losses pertain to privately issued residential mortgage-backed securities with a cost basis of
$2.0 billion. The Company also had $56 million of unrealized losses on trust preferred securities
issued by financial institutions and securities backed by trust preferred securities issued by
financial institutions having a cost basis of $171 million. Based on a review of each of the
remaining securities in the investment securities portfolio at March 31, 2010, with the exception
of the aforementioned securities for which other-than-temporary impairment losses were recognized,
the Company concluded that it expected to recover the amortized cost basis of its investment. As
of March 31, 2010, the Company does not intend to sell nor is it anticipated that it would be
required to sell any of its impaired investment securities. At March 31, 2010, the Company has not
identified events or changes in circumstances which may have a significant adverse effect on the
fair value of the $498 million of cost method investment securities.
- 12 -
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED
4. Borrowings
The Company had $1.2 billion of fixed and floating rate junior subordinated deferrable interest
debentures (Junior Subordinated Debentures) outstanding at March 31, 2010 which are held by
various trusts that were issued in connection with the issuance by those trusts of preferred
capital securities (Capital Securities) and common securities (Common Securities). The
proceeds from the issuances of the Capital Securities and the Common Securities were used by the
trusts to purchase the Junior Subordinated Debentures. The Common Securities of each of those
trusts are wholly owned by M&T and are the only class of each trusts securities possessing general
voting powers. The Capital Securities represent preferred undivided interests in the assets of the
corresponding trust. Under the Federal Reserve Boards current risk-based capital guidelines, the
Capital Securities are includable in M&Ts Tier 1 capital.
Holders of the Capital Securities receive preferential cumulative cash distributions unless M&T
exercises its right to extend the payment of interest on the Junior Subordinated Debentures as
allowed by the terms of each such debenture, in which case payment of distributions on the
respective Capital Securities will be deferred for comparable periods. During an extended interest
period, M&T may not pay dividends or distributions on, or repurchase, redeem or acquire any shares
of its capital stock. In the event of an extended interest period exceeding twenty quarterly
periods for $350 million of Junior Subordinated Debentures due January 31, 2068, M&T must fund the
payment of accrued and unpaid interest through an alternative payment mechanism, which requires M&T
to issue common stock, non-cumulative perpetual preferred stock or warrants to purchase common
stock until M&T has raised an amount of eligible proceeds at least equal to the aggregate amount of
accrued and unpaid deferred interest on the Junior Subordinated Debentures due January 31, 2068.
In general, the agreements governing the Capital Securities, in the aggregate, provide a full,
irrevocable and unconditional guarantee by M&T of the payment of distributions on, the redemption
of, and any liquidation distribution with respect to the Capital Securities. The obligations under
such guarantee and the Capital Securities are subordinate and junior in right of payment to all
senior indebtedness of M&T.
The Capital Securities will remain outstanding until the Junior Subordinated Debentures are
repaid at maturity, are redeemed prior to maturity or are distributed in liquidation to the Trusts.
The Capital Securities are mandatorily redeemable in whole, but not in part, upon repayment at the
stated maturity dates (ranging from 2027 to 2068) of the Junior Subordinated Debentures or the
earlier redemption of the Junior Subordinated Debentures in whole upon the occurrence of one or
more events set forth in the indentures relating to the Capital Securities, and in whole or in part
at any time after an optional redemption prior to contractual maturity contemporaneously with the
optional redemption of the related Junior Subordinated Debentures in whole or in part, subject to
possible regulatory approval. In connection with the issuance of 8.50% Enhanced Trust Preferred
Securities associated with $350 million of Junior Subordinated Debentures maturing in 2068, M&T
entered into a replacement capital covenant that provides that neither M&T nor any of its
subsidiaries will repay, redeem or purchase any of the Junior Subordinated Debentures due January
31, 2068 or the 8.50% Enhanced Trust Preferred Securities prior to January 31, 2048, with certain
limited exceptions, except to the extent that, during the 180 days prior to the date of that
repayment, redemption or purchase, M&T and its subsidiaries have received proceeds from the sale of
qualifying securities that (i) have equity-like characteristics that are the same as, or more
equity-like than, the applicable characteristics of the 8.50% Enhanced Trust Preferred Securities
or the Junior Subordinated Debentures due January 31, 2068, as applicable, at the time of
repayment, redemption or purchase, and (ii) M&T has obtained the prior approval of the Federal
Reserve Board, if required.
- 13 -
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED
4. Borrowings, continued
Including the unamortized portions of purchase accounting adjustments to reflect estimated
fair value at the acquisition dates of the Common Securities of various trusts the Junior
Subordinated Debentures associated with Capital Securities had financial statement carrying values
of $1.2 billion at each of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009.
5. Stockholders equity
M&T is authorized to issue 1,000,000 shares of preferred stock with a $1.00 par value per share.
Preferred shares outstanding rank senior to common shares both as to dividends and liquidation
preference, but have no general voting rights.
Issued and outstanding preferred stock of M&T is presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares |
|
Carrying |
|
Carrying |
|
|
issued and |
|
value |
|
value |
|
|
outstanding |
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands) |
Series A (a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed Rate Cumulative Perpetual
Preferred Stock, Series A,
$1,000 liquidation preference
per share, 600,000 shares
authorized |
|
|
600,000 |
|
|
$ |
574,057 |
|
|
|
572,580 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series B (b) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series B Mandatory Convertible
Non-cumulative Preferred
Stock, $1,000 liquidation
preference per share, 26,500
shares authorized |
|
|
26,500 |
|
|
|
26,500 |
|
|
|
26,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series C (a)(c) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed Rate Cumulative Perpetual
Preferred Stock, Series C,
$1,000 liquidation preference
per share, 151,500 shares
authorized |
|
|
151,500 |
|
|
|
132,212 |
|
|
|
131,155 |
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Shares were issued as part of the Troubled Asset Relief Program Capital Purchase Program
of the U.S. Department of Treasury (U.S. Treasury). Cash proceeds were allocated between
the preferred stock and a ten-year warrant to purchase M&T common stock (Series A 1,218,522
common shares at $73.86 per share, Series C 407,542 common shares at $55.76 per share).
Dividends, if declared, will accrue and be paid quarterly at a rate of 5% per year for the
first five years following the original 2008 issuance dates and thereafter at a rate of 9% per
year. The agreement with the U.S. Treasury contains limitations on certain actions of M&T,
including the payment of quarterly cash dividends on M&Ts common stock in excess of $.70 per
share, the repurchase of its common stock during the first three years of the agreement, and
the amount and nature of compensation arrangements for certain of the Companys officers. |
|
(b) |
|
Shares were assumed in the Provident acquisition and a new Series B Preferred Stock was
designated. In the aggregate, the shares of Series B Preferred Stock will automatically
convert into 433,148 shares of M&T common stock on April 1, 2011, but shareholders may elect
to convert their preferred shares at any time prior to that date. Dividends, if declared, are
payable quarterly in arrears at a rate of 10% per year. |
- 14 -
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED
|
|
|
5. |
|
Stockholders equity, continued |
|
|
|
(c) |
|
Shares were assumed in the Provident acquisition and a new Series C Preferred Stock was
designated. |
6. Pension plans and other postretirement benefits
The Company provides defined benefit pension and other postretirement benefits (including health
care and life insurance benefits) to qualified retired employees. Net periodic benefit cost for
defined benefit plans consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
Pension |
|
|
postretirement |
|
|
|
benefits |
|
|
benefits |
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
4,875 |
|
|
|
4,875 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
150 |
|
Interest cost on projected benefit
obligation |
|
|
12,029 |
|
|
|
11,015 |
|
|
|
780 |
|
|
|
900 |
|
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
(12,788 |
) |
|
|
(11,475 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of prior service cost |
|
|
(1,650 |
) |
|
|
(1,650 |
) |
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
75 |
|
Amortization of net actuarial loss |
|
|
3,321 |
|
|
|
2,350 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic benefit cost |
|
$ |
5,787 |
|
|
|
5,115 |
|
|
|
905 |
|
|
|
1,125 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expense incurred in connection with the Companys defined contribution pension and retirement
savings plans totaled $11,690,000 and $10,774,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and
2009, respectively.
- 15 -
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED
7. Earnings per common share
The computations of basic earnings per common share follow:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
(in thousands, except per share) |
|
Income available to common
stockholders: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
150,955 |
|
|
|
64,221 |
|
Less: Preferred stock dividends (a) |
|
|
(10,056 |
) |
|
|
(7,500 |
) |
Amortization of preferred
stock discount (a) |
|
|
(2,558 |
) |
|
|
(1,399 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income available to common equity |
|
|
138,341 |
|
|
|
55,322 |
|
Less: Income attributable to unvested
stock-based compensation awards |
|
|
(1,913 |
) |
|
|
(704 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income available to common
stockholders |
|
$ |
136,428 |
|
|
|
54,618 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average shares
outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares outstanding (including
common stock issuable) and unvested
stock-based compensation awards |
|
|
119,324 |
|
|
|
111,298 |
|
Less: Unvested stock-based
compensation awards |
|
|
(1,559 |
) |
|
|
(859 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average shares
outstanding |
|
|
117,765 |
|
|
|
110,439 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per common share |
|
$ |
1.16 |
|
|
|
.49 |
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Including impact of not as yet declared cumulative dividends. |
- 16 -
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED
7. Earnings per common share, continued
The computations of diluted earnings per common share follow:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
(in thousands, except per share) |
|
|
Net income available to common equity |
|
$ |
138,341 |
|
|
|
55,322 |
|
Less: Income attributable to unvested
stock-based compensation awards |
|
|
(1,910 |
) |
|
|
(704 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income available to common
stockholders |
|
|
136,431 |
|
|
|
54,618 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted weighted-average
shares outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common and unvested stock-based
compensation awards |
|
|
119,324 |
|
|
|
111,298 |
|
|
Less: Unvested stock-based compensation
awards |
|
|
(1,559 |
) |
|
|
(859 |
) |
Plus: Incremental shares from assumed
conversion of stock-based
compensation awards and
convertible preferred stock |
|
|
491 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted weighted-average shares
outstanding |
|
|
118,256 |
|
|
|
110,439 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per common share |
|
$ |
1.15 |
|
|
|
.49 |
|
GAAP defines unvested share-based awards that contain nonforfeitable rights to dividends or
dividend equivalents (whether paid or unpaid) as participating securities that shall be included in
the computation of earnings per common share pursuant to the two-class method. During the first
quarters of 2010 and 2009, the Company issued stock-based compensation awards in the form of
restricted stock and restricted stock units, which, in accordance with GAAP, are considered
participating securities.
Stock-based compensation awards, warrants to purchase common stock of M&T and preferred stock
convertible into shares of M&T common stock representing approximately 11.9 million and 15.0
million common shares during the three-month periods ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively,
were not included in the computations of diluted earnings per common share because the effect on
those periods would have been antidilutive.
- 17 -
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED
8. Comprehensive income
The following table displays the components of other comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
Before-tax |
|
|
Income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
amount |
|
|
taxes |
|
|
Net |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Unrealized gains (losses)
on investment securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available for sale (AFS)
investment securities with
other-than-temporary
impairment (OTTI): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities with OTTI charges
during the period |
|
$ |
(29,487 |
) |
|
|
11,574 |
|
|
|
(17,913 |
) |
Less: OTTI charges
recognized in net income |
|
|
(26,802 |
) |
|
|
10,483 |
|
|
|
(16,319 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized losses on
investment securities
with OTTI |
|
|
(2,685 |
) |
|
|
1,091 |
|
|
|
(1,594 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AFS investment securities
all other: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized holding
gains during period |
|
|
101,892 |
|
|
|
(39,882 |
) |
|
|
62,010 |
|
Less: reclassification
adjustment for gains
realized in net income |
|
|
(145 |
) |
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
(101 |
) |
Less: securities with OTTI
charges during the period |
|
|
(29,487 |
) |
|
|
11,574 |
|
|
|
(17,913 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
131,524 |
|
|
|
(51,500 |
) |
|
|
80,024 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reclassification of unrealized
holding losses to income during
period on investment securities
previously transferred from
AFS to held to maturity (HTM) |
|
|
2,347 |
|
|
|
(921 |
) |
|
|
1,426 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized gains on
investment securities |
|
|
131,186 |
|
|
|
(51,330 |
) |
|
|
79,856 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reclassification of
gain on terminated cash
flow hedge to income |
|
|
(112 |
) |
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
(70 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Defined benefit plans
liability adjustment |
|
|
1,696 |
|
|
|
(666 |
) |
|
|
1,030 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
132,770 |
|
|
|
(51,954 |
) |
|
|
80,816 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- 18 -
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED
8. Comprehensive income, continued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
Before-tax |
|
|
Income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
amount |
|
|
taxes |
|
|
Net |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Unrealized gains (losses)
on investment securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AFS investment securities with
OTTI: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities with OTTI charges
during the period |
|
$ |
(62,808 |
) |
|
|
24,566 |
|
|
|
(38,242 |
) |
Less: OTTI charges
recognized in net income |
|
|
(32,199 |
) |
|
|
12,590 |
|
|
|
(19,609 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized losses on
investment securities
with OTTI |
|
|
(30,609 |
) |
|
|
11,976 |
|
|
|
(18,633 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AFS investment securities
all other: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized holding
gains during period |
|
|
147,229 |
|
|
|
(58,559 |
) |
|
|
88,670 |
|
Less: reclassification
adjustment for gains
realized in net income |
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
17 |
|
Less: securities with OTTI
charges during the period |
|
|
(62,808 |
) |
|
|
24,566 |
|
|
|
(38,242 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
210,010 |
|
|
|
(83,115 |
) |
|
|
126,895 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reclassification of unrealized
holding losses to income during
period on investment securities
previously transferred from
AFS to HTM |
|
|
3,456 |
|
|
|
(879 |
) |
|
|
2,577 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized gains on
investment securities |
|
|
182,857 |
|
|
|
(72,018 |
) |
|
|
110,839 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reclassification of
losses on terminated cash
flow hedges to income |
|
|
5,185 |
|
|
|
(2,024 |
) |
|
|
3,161 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Defined benefit plans
liability adjustment |
|
|
775 |
|
|
|
(303 |
) |
|
|
472 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
188,817 |
|
|
|
(74,345 |
) |
|
|
114,472 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- 19 -
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED
8. Comprehensive income, continued
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net consisted of unrealized gains (losses) as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash |
|
|
Defined |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities |
|
|
flow |
|
|
benefit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
With OTTI |
|
|
All other |
|
|
hedges |
|
|
plans |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Balance January 1, 2010 |
|
$ |
(76,772 |
) |
|
|
(142,853 |
) |
|
|
674 |
|
|
|
(117,046 |
) |
|
|
(335,997 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net gain (loss) during period |
|
|
(1,594 |
) |
|
|
81,450 |
|
|
|
(70 |
) |
|
|
1,030 |
|
|
|
80,816 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance March 31, 2010 |
|
$ |
(78,366 |
) |
|
|
(61,403 |
) |
|
|
604 |
|
|
|
(116,016 |
) |
|
|
(255,181 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance January 1, 2009 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
(556,668 |
) |
|
|
(5,883 |
) |
|
|
(174,330 |
) |
|
|
(736,881 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net gain (loss) during period |
|
|
(18,633 |
) |
|
|
129,472 |
|
|
|
3,161 |
|
|
|
472 |
|
|
|
114,472 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance March 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
(18,633 |
) |
|
|
(427,196 |
) |
|
|
(2,722 |
) |
|
|
(173,858 |
) |
|
|
(622,409 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9. Derivative financial instruments
As part of managing interest rate risk, the Company enters into interest rate swap agreements to
modify the repricing characteristics of certain portions of the Companys portfolios of earning
assets and interest-bearing liabilities. The Company designates interest rate swap agreements
utilized in the management of interest rate risk as either fair value hedges or cash flow hedges.
Interest rate swap agreements are generally entered into with counterparties that meet established
credit standards and most contain master netting and collateral provisions protecting the at-risk
party. Based on adherence to the Companys credit standards and the presence of the netting and
collateral provisions, the Company believes that the credit risk inherent in these contracts is not
significant as of March 31, 2010.
The net effect of interest rate swap agreements was to increase net interest income by $11
million and $7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
Information about interest rate swap agreements entered into for interest rate risk management
purposes summarized by type of financial instrument the swap agreements were intended to hedge
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
Notional |
|
|
Average |
|
|
average rate |
|
|
|
amount |
|
|
maturity |
|
|
Fixed |
|
|
Variable |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
(in years) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value hedges: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed rate time deposits (a) |
|
$ |
25,000 |
|
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
|
5.30 |
% |
|
|
0.36 |
% |
Fixed rate long-term borrowings (a) |
|
|
1,037,241 |
|
|
|
6.2 |
|
|
|
6.33 |
% |
|
|
2.11 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,062,241 |
|
|
|
6.2 |
|
|
|
6.30 |
% |
|
|
2.07 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value hedges: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed rate time deposits (a) |
|
$ |
25,000 |
|
|
|
3.7 |
|
|
|
5.30 |
% |
|
|
0.34 |
% |
Fixed rate long-term borrowings (a) |
|
|
1,037,241 |
|
|
|
6.5 |
|
|
|
6.33 |
% |
|
|
2.12 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,062,241 |
|
|
|
6.4 |
|
|
|
6.30 |
% |
|
|
2.07 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Under the terms of these agreements, the Company receives settlement amounts
at a fixed rate and pays at a variable rate. |
- 20 -
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED
9. Derivative financial instruments, continued
The Company utilizes commitments to sell residential and commercial real estate loans to hedge
the exposure to changes in the fair value of real estate loans held for sale. Such commitments
have generally been designated as fair value hedges. The Company also utilizes commitments to sell
real estate loans to offset the exposure to changes in fair value of certain commitments to
originate real estate loans for sale.
Derivative financial instruments used for trading purposes included interest rate contracts,
foreign exchange and other option contracts, foreign exchange forward and spot contracts, and
financial futures. Interest rate contracts entered into for trading purposes had notional values of
$12.8 billion and $13.9 billion at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively. The notional
amounts of foreign currency and other option and futures contracts entered into for trading
purposes aggregated $701 million and $608 million at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009,
respectively.
Information about the fair values of derivative instruments in the Companys
consolidated balance sheet and consolidated statement of income follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset derivatives |
|
|
Liability derivatives |
|
|
|
Fair value |
|
|
Fair value |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Derivatives designated and
qualifying as hedging
instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value hedges: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swap
agreements (a) |
|
$ |
67,092 |
|
|
|
54,486 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments to sell real estate
loans (a) |
|
|
1,258 |
|
|
|
6,009 |
|
|
|
230 |
|
|
|
171 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
68,350 |
|
|
|
60,495 |
|
|
|
230 |
|
|
|
171 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives not designated and
qualifying as hedging
instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-related commitments to
originate real estate loans for
sale (a) |
|
|
8,494 |
|
|
|
4,428 |
|
|
|
323 |
|
|
|
4,508 |
|
Commitments to sell real estate
loans (a) |
|
|
2,338 |
|
|
|
13,293 |
|
|
|
1,469 |
|
|
|
1,360 |
|
Trading: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate contracts (b) |
|
|
330,868 |
|
|
|
317,651 |
|
|
|
304,180 |
|
|
|
290,104 |
|
Foreign exchange and other
option and futures contracts
(b) |
|
|
12,003 |
|
|
|
11,908 |
|
|
|
11,846 |
|
|
|
12,094 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
353,703 |
|
|
|
347,280 |
|
|
|
317,818 |
|
|
|
308,066 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivatives |
|
$ |
422,053 |
|
|
|
407,775 |
|
|
$ |
318,048 |
|
|
|
308,237 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Asset derivatives are reported in other assets and liability derivatives are reported in
other liabilities. |
|
(b) |
|
Asset derivatives are reported in trading account assets and liability derivatives are
reported in other liabilities. |
- 21 -
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED
9. Derivative financial instruments, continued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of unrealized gain (loss) recognized |
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
Derivative |
|
|
Hedged item |
|
|
Derivative |
|
|
Hedged item |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Derivatives in fair value
hedging relationships |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swap
agreements: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed rate time
deposits (a) |
|
$ |
(199 |
) |
|
|
199 |
|
|
$ |
(452 |
) |
|
|
449 |
|
Fixed rate long-term
borrowings (a) |
|
|
12,470 |
|
|
|
(11,981 |
) |
|
|
(21,315 |
) |
|
|
19,661 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
12,271 |
|
|
|
(11,782 |
) |
|
$ |
(21,767 |
) |
|
|
20,110 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives not designated
as hedging instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate contracts (b) |
|
$ |
(614 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(172 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange and other
option and futures contracts
(b) |
|
|
342 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
876 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
(272 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
704 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Reported as other revenues from operations. |
|
(b) |
|
Reported as trading account and foreign exchange gains. |
In addition, the Company also has commitments to sell and commitments to originate residential
and commercial real estate loans that are considered derivatives. The Company designates certain
of the commitments to sell real estate loans as fair value hedges of real estate loans held for
sale. The Company also utilizes commitments to sell real estate loans to offset the exposure to
changes in the fair value of certain commitments to originate real estate loans for sale. As a
result of these activities, net unrealized pre-tax gains related to hedged loans held for sale,
commitments to originate loans for sale and commitments to sell loans were approximately $17
million and $20 million at March 31, 2010 and
December 31, 2009, respectively. Changes in
unrealized gains and losses are included in mortgage banking revenues and, in general, are realized
in subsequent periods as the related loans are sold and commitments satisfied.
The aggregate fair value of derivative financial instruments in a net liability position at
March 31, 2010 for which the Company was required to post collateral was $230 million. The fair
value of collateral posted for such instruments was $221 million.
The Companys credit exposure with respect to the estimated fair value as of March 31, 2010 of
interest rate swap agreements used for managing interest rate risk has been substantially mitigated
through master netting agreements with trading account interest rate contracts with the same
counterparties as well as counterparty postings of $47 million of collateral with the Company.
- 22 -
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED
10. Variable interest entities and asset securitizations
Effective January 1, 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) amended accounting
guidance relating to the consolidation of variable interest entities to eliminate the quantitative
approach previously required for determining the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity.
The amended guidance instead requires a reporting entity to qualitatively assess the determination
of the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity based on whether the reporting entity has
the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the variable interest entitys
economic performance and has the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits of
the variable interest entity that could potentially be significant to the variable interest entity.
The amended guidance requires ongoing reassessments of whether the reporting entity is the primary
beneficiary of a variable interest entity.
Also effective January 1, 2010, the FASB amended accounting guidance relating to accounting
for transfers of financial assets to eliminate the exceptions for qualifying special purpose
entities from the consolidation guidance and the exception that permitted sale accounting for
certain mortgage securitizations when a transferor has not surrendered control over the transferred
assets. The recognition and measurement provisions of the amended guidance were required to be
applied prospectively. Additionally, beginning January 1, 2010, the concept of a qualifying
special-purpose entity is no longer relevant for accounting purposes. Therefore, formerly
qualifying special-purpose entities had to be re-evaluated for consolidation in accordance with
applicable consolidation guidance, including the new accounting guidance relating to the
consolidation of variable interest entities discussed in the previous paragraph.
In 2002 and 2003, the Company transferred approximately $1.9 billion of one-to-four family
residential mortgage loans to qualified special purpose trusts in two non-recourse securitization
transactions. In exchange for the loans, the Company received cash, no more than 88% of the
resulting securities, and the servicing rights to the loans. Through December 31, 2009, all of the
retained securities were classified as investment securities available for sale as the qualified
special purpose trusts were not included in the Companys consolidated financial statements.
Effective January 1, 2010, the Company determined that it was the primary beneficiary of both
securitization trusts under the amended consolidation rules considering its role as servicer and
its retained subordinated interests in the trusts. As a result, beginning January 1, 2010, the
Company has included the one-to-four family residential mortgage loans that were included in the
two non-recourse securitization transactions in its consolidated financial statements. The effect
of that consolidation on January 1, 2010 was to increase loans receivable by $424 million, decrease
the amortized cost of available-for-sale investment securities by $360 million (fair value of
$355 million), and increase borrowings by $65 million. The transition adjustment at January 1,
2010 as a result of the Companys adoption of the new accounting requirements was not significant.
At March 31, 2010, the carrying value of the loans in the securitization trusts was $406 million.
The combined outstanding principal amount of mortgage-backed securities issued by the qualified
special purpose trusts was $414 million at March 31, 2010 and the principal amount of such
securities held by the Company was $352 million. The remainder of the outstanding mortgage-backed
securities were held by parties unrelated to M&T. Because the transactions were non-recourse, the
Companys maximum exposure to loss as a result of its association with the trusts at March 31, 2010
is limited to realizing the carrying value of the loans less the $62 million carrying value of the
mortgage-backed securities outstanding to third parties.
- 23 -
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED
10. Variable interest entities and asset securitizations, continued
In the first quarter of 2009, the Company securitized approximately $141 million of
one-to-four family residential mortgage loans in guaranteed mortgage securitizations with Fannie
Mae. The Company recognized no gain or loss on the transactions as it retained all of the resulting
securities. Such securities were classified as investment securities available for sale. The
Company expects no material credit-related losses on the retained securities as a result of the
guarantees by Fannie Mae. The Company had no such securitizations in the first quarter of 2010.
Other variable interest entities in which the Company holds a variable interest are described
below.
M&T has a variable interest in a trust that holds AIB ADSs for the purpose of satisfying
options to purchase such shares for certain employees. The trust purchased the AIB ADSs with the
proceeds of a loan from an entity subsequently acquired by M&T. Proceeds from option exercises and
any dividends and other earnings on the trust assets are used to repay the loan plus interest.
Option holders have no preferential right with respect to the trust assets and the trust assets are
subject to the claims of M&Ts creditors. The trust has been included in the Companys consolidated
financial statements. As a result, included in investment securities available for sale were
591,813 AIB ADSs with a carrying value of approximately $2 million at both March 31, 2010 and
December 31, 2009. Outstanding options granted to employees who have continued service with M&T
totaled 189,450 at each of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009. All outstanding options were fully
vested and exercisable at both March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009. The options expire at various
dates through October 2011. The AIB ADSs are included in available for sale investment securities
and have a fair value of $2 million and an amortized cost of $13 million at March 31, 2010.
As described in note 4, M&T has issued junior subordinated debentures payable to various
trusts that have issued Capital Securities. M&T owns the common securities of those trust entities.
The Company is not considered to be the primary beneficiary of those entities and, accordingly, the
trusts are not included in the Companys consolidated financial statements. At March 31, 2010 and
December 31, 2009, the Company included the Junior Subordinated Debentures as long-term
borrowings in its consolidated balance sheet. The Company has recognized $34 million in other
assets for its investment in the common securities of the trusts that will be concomitantly
repaid to M&T by the respective trust from the proceeds of M&Ts repayment of the junior
subordinated debentures associated with preferred capital securities described in note 4.
The Company has invested as a limited partner in various real estate partnerships that
collectively had total assets of approximately $1.1 billion and $1.0 billion at March 31, 2010 and
December 31, 2009, respectively. Those partnerships generally construct or acquire properties for
which the investing partners are eligible to receive certain federal income tax credits in
accordance with government guidelines. Such investments may also provide tax deductible losses to
the partners. The partnership investments also assist the Company in achieving its community
reinvestment initiatives. As a limited partner, there is no recourse to the Company by creditors of
the partnerships. However, the tax credits that result from the Companys investments in such
partnerships are generally subject to recapture should a partnership fail to comply with the
respective government regulations. The Companys maximum exposure to loss of its investments in
such partnerships was $246 million, including $92 million of unfunded commitments, at March 31,
2010 and $246 million, including $89 million of unfunded commitments, at December 31, 2009. The
Company has not provided financial or other support to the partnerships
- 24 -
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED
10. Variable interest entities and asset securitizations, continued
during the quarters ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 that was not contractually required. Management
currently estimates that no material losses are probable as a result of the Companys involvement
with such entities. In accordance with the accounting provisions for variable interest entities,
the Company, in its position as limited partner, does not direct the activities that most
significantly impact the economic performance of the partnerships and therefore, the partnership
entities are not included in the Companys consolidated financial statements.
11. Fair value measurements
GAAP permits an entity to choose to measure eligible financial instruments and other items at fair
value. The Company has not made any fair value elections as of March 31, 2010.
Pursuant to GAAP, fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset
or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the
measurement date. A three-level hierarchy exists in GAAP for fair value measurements based upon
the inputs to the valuation of an asset or liability.
|
|
|
Level 1 Valuation is based on quoted prices in active markets for identical
assets and liabilities. |
|
|
|
|
Level 2 Valuation is determined from quoted prices for similar assets or
liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in
markets that are not active or by model-based techniques in which all significant inputs
are observable in the market. |
|
|
|
|
Level 3 Valuation is derived from model-based and other techniques in which
at least one significant input is unobservable and which may be based on the Companys own
estimates about the assumptions that market participants would use to value the asset or
liability. |
When available, the Company attempts to use quoted market prices in active markets to
determine fair value and classifies such items as Level 1 or Level 2. If quoted market prices in
active markets are not available, fair value is often determined using model-based techniques
incorporating various assumptions including interest rates, prepayment speeds and credit losses.
Assets and liabilities valued using model-based techniques are classified as either Level 2 or
Level 3, depending on the lowest level classification of an input that is considered significant to
the overall valuation. The following is a description of the valuation methodologies used for the
Companys assets and liabilities that are measured on a recurring basis at estimated fair value.
Trading account assets and liabilities
Trading account assets and liabilities consist primarily of interest rate swap agreements and
foreign exchange contracts with customers who require such services with offsetting trading
positions with third parties to minimize the Companys risk with respect to such transactions. The
Company generally determines the fair value of its derivative trading account assets and
liabilities using externally developed pricing models based on market observable inputs and
therefore classifies such valuations as Level 2. Prices for certain foreign exchange contracts are
more observable and therefore have been classified as Level 1. Mutual funds held in connection with
deferred compensation arrangements have also been classified as Level 1 valuations. Valuations of
investments in municipal and other bonds can generally be obtained
- 25 -
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED
11. Fair value measurements, continued
through reference to quoted prices in less active markets for the same or similar securities or
through model-based techniques in which all significant inputs are observable and, therefore, such
valuations have been classified as Level 2.
Investment securities available for sale
The majority of the Companys available-for-sale investment securities have been valued by
reference to prices for similar securities or through model-based techniques in which all
significant inputs are observable and, therefore, such valuations have been classified as Level 2.
Certain investments in mutual funds and equity securities are actively traded and therefore have
been classified as Level 1 valuations.
Due to continuing disruption in the credit markets, trading activity in privately issued
mortgage-backed securities has been limited. The markets for such securities were generally
characterized by a sharp reduction of non-agency mortgage-backed securities issuances, a
significant reduction in trading volumes and extremely wide bid-ask spreads, all driven by the lack
of market participants. Although estimated prices were generally obtained for such securities, the
Company was significantly restricted in the level of market observable assumptions used in the
valuation of its privately issued mortgage-backed securities portfolio. Specifically, market
assumptions regarding credit adjusted cash flows and liquidity influences on discount rates were
difficult to observe at the individual bond level. Because of the inactivity in the markets and the
lack of observable valuation inputs, the Company has classified the valuation of privately issued
mortgage-backed securities as Level 3.
In April 2009, the FASB issued new accounting rules that provided guidance for estimating fair
value when the volume and level of trading activity for an asset or liability have significantly
decreased. The Company has concluded that there has been a significant decline in the volume and
level of activity in the market for privately issued mortgage-backed securities. Therefore, the
Company supplemented its determination of fair value for many of its privately issued
mortgage-backed securities by obtaining pricing indications from two independent sources at March
31, 2010. However, the Company could not readily ascertain that the basis of such valuations could
be ascribed to orderly and observable trades in the market for privately issued residential
mortgage-backed securities. As a result, the Company also performed internal modeling to estimate
the cash flows and fair value of 145 of its privately issued residential mortgage-backed securities
with an amortized cost basis of $1.8 billion at March 31, 2010. The Companys internal modeling
techniques included discounting estimated bond-specific cash flows using assumptions about cash
flows associated with loans underlying each of the bonds, including estimates about the timing and
amount of credit losses and prepayments. In estimating those cash flows, the Company used
assumptions as to future delinquency, defaults and loss rates, including assumptions
for further home price depreciation. Differences between internal model valuations and external
pricing indications were generally considered to be reflective of the lack of liquidity in the
market for privately issued mortgage-backed securities given the nature of the cash
flow modeling performed in the Companys assessment of value. To determine the point within the
range of potential values that was most representative of fair value under current market
conditions for each of the 145 bonds, the Company computed values based on judgmentally applied
weightings of the internal model valuations and the indications obtained from the average of the
two independent pricing sources. Weightings applied to internal model valuations ranged from zero
to 40% depending on bond structure and collateral type, with prices for bonds in non-senior
tranches generally receiving lower weightings on the internal model results and senior bonds
receiving a higher model weighting. Weighted-average reliance on internal model pricing for the
bonds
- 26 -
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED
11. Fair value measurements, continued
modeled was 37% with a 63% average weighting placed on the values provided by the independent
sources. The Company concluded its estimate of fair value for the $1.8 billion of privately issued
residential mortgage-backed securities to approximate $1.5 billion, which implies a
weighted-average market yield based on reasonably likely cash flows of 9.5%. Other valuations of
privately issued mortgage-backed securities were determined by reference to independent pricing
sources without adjustment.
Included in CDOs are securities backed by trust preferred securities issued by financial
institutions and other entities. Given the severe disruption in the credit markets and lack of
observable trade information, the Company could not obtain pricing indications for many of these
securities from its two primary independent pricing sources. The Company, therefore, performed
internal modeling to estimate the cash flows and fair value of its portfolio of securities backed
by trust preferred securities at March 31, 2010. The modeling techniques included discounting
estimated cash flows using bond-specific assumptions about defaults, deferrals and prepayments of
the trust preferred securities underlying each bond. The estimation of cash flows included
assumptions as to the future collateral defaults and the related loss severities. The
resulting cash flows were then discounted by reference to market yields observed in the single-name
trust preferred securities market. At March 31, 2010, the total amortized cost and fair value of
securities backed by trust preferred securities issued by financial institutions and other entities
was $102 million and $126 million, respectively. Privately issued mortgage-backed securities and
securities backed by trust preferred securities issued by financial institutions and other entities
constituted substantially all of the available-for-sale investment securities classified as Level 3
valuations as of March 31, 2010.
Real estate loans held for sale
The Company utilizes commitments to sell real estate loans to hedge the exposure to changes in fair
value of real estate loans held for sale. The carrying value of hedged real estate loans held for
sale includes changes in estimated fair value during the hedge period. Typically, the Company
attempts to hedge real estate loans held for sale from the date of close through the sale date.
The fair value of hedged real estate loans held for sale is generally calculated by reference to
quoted prices in secondary markets for commitments to sell real estate loans with similar
characteristics and, as such, have been classified as a Level 2 valuation.
Commitments to originate real estate loans for sale and commitments to sell real estate loans
The Company enters into various commitments to originate real estate loans for sale and commitments
to sell real estate loans. Such commitments are considered to be derivative financial instruments
and, therefore, are carried at estimated fair value on the consolidated balance sheet. The
estimated fair values of such commitments were generally calculated by reference to quoted prices
in secondary markets for commitments to sell real estate loans to certain government-sponsored
entities and other parties. The fair valuations of commitments to sell real estate loans generally
result in a Level 2 classification. The estimated fair value of commitments to originate real
estate loans for sale are adjusted to reflect the Companys anticipated commitment expirations.
Estimated commitment expirations are considered a significant unobservable input, which results in
a Level 3 classification. The Company includes the expected net future cash flows related to the
associated servicing of the loan in the fair value measurement of a derivative loan commitment.
The estimated value ascribed to the expected net future servicing cash flows is also considered a
significant unobservable input contributing to the Level 3 classification of commitments to
originate real estate loans for sale.
- 27 -
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED
11. Fair value measurements, continued
Interest rate swap agreements used for interest rate risk management
The Company utilizes interest rate swap agreements as part of the management of interest rate risk
to modify the repricing characteristics of certain portions of its portfolios of earning assets and
interest-bearing liabilities. The Company generally determines the fair value of its interest rate
swap agreements using externally developed pricing models based on market observable inputs and
therefore classifies such valuations as Level 2. The Company has considered counterparty credit
risk in the valuation of its interest rate swap assets and has considered its own credit risk in
the valuation of its interest rate swap liabilities.
The following tables present assets and liabilities at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009
measured at estimated fair value on a recurring basis:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
measurements at |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Level 1(a) |
|
|
Level 2(a) |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Trading account assets |
|
$ |
403,476 |
|
|
|
36,920 |
|
|
|
366,556 |
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities
available for sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury and
federal agencies |
|
|
100,105 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100,105 |
|
|
|
|
|
Obligations of states
and political subdivisions |
|
|
71,720 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71,720 |
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Government issued or
guaranteed |
|
|
3,688,910 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,688,910 |
|
|
|
|
|
Privately issued
residential |
|
|
1,664,341 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,664,341 |
|
Privately issued
commercial |
|
|
25,125 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,125 |
|
Collateralized debt
obligations |
|
|
125,755 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
125,755 |
|
Other debt securities |
|
|
285,691 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
285,236 |
|
|
|
455 |
|
Equity securities |
|
|
135,619 |
|
|
|
121,395 |
|
|
|
14,224 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,097,266 |
|
|
|
121,395 |
|
|
|
4,160,195 |
|
|
|
1,815,676 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate loans
held for sale |
|
|
423,218 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
423,218 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets (b) |
|
|
79,182 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70,688 |
|
|
|
8,494 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
7,003,142 |
|
|
|
158,315 |
|
|
|
5,020,657 |
|
|
|
1,824,170 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading account
liabilities |
|
$ |
316,026 |
|
|
|
2,627 |
|
|
|
313,399 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities (b) |
|
|
2,022 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,699 |
|
|
|
323 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
$ |
318,048 |
|
|
|
2,627 |
|
|
|
315,098 |
|
|
|
323 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- 28 -
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED
11. Fair value measurements, continued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
measurements at |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Trading account assets |
|
$ |
386,984 |
|
|
|
40,836 |
|
|
|
346,148 |
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities
available for sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury and
federal agencies |
|
|
104,686 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
104,686 |
|
|
|
|
|
Obligations of states
and political subdivisions |
|
|
62,923 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
62,923 |
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Government issued or
guaranteed |
|
|
3,902,282 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,902,282 |
|
|
|
|
|
Privately issued
residential |
|
|
2,064,904 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,064,904 |
|
Privately issued
commercial |
|
|
25,166 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,166 |
|
Collateralized debt
obligations |
|
|
115,346 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
115,346 |
|
Other debt securities |
|
|
268,201 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
267,781 |
|
|
|
420 |
|
Equity securities |
|
|
160,870 |
|
|
|
145,817 |
|
|
|
15,053 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,704,378 |
|
|
|
145,817 |
|
|
|
4,352,725 |
|
|
|
2,205,836 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate loans
held for sale |
|
|
652,761 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
652,761 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets (b) |
|
|
78,216 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
73,788 |
|
|
|
4,428 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
7,822,339 |
|
|
|
186,653 |
|
|
|
5,425,422 |
|
|
|
2,210,264 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading account
liabilities |
|
$ |
302,198 |
|
|
|
5,577 |
|
|
|
296,621 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities (b) |
|
|
6,039 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,531 |
|
|
|
4,508 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
$ |
308,237 |
|
|
|
5,577 |
|
|
|
298,152 |
|
|
|
4,508 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
There were no significant transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 of the fair value
hierarchy during the three-month period ended March 31, 2010. |
|
(b) |
|
Comprised predominantly of interest rate swap agreements used for interest rate risk
management (Level 2), commitments to sell real estate loans (Level 2) and commitments to
originate real estate loans to be held for sale (Level 3). |
- 29 -
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED
11. Fair value measurements, continued
The changes in Level 3 assets and liabilities measured at estimated fair value on a recurring
basis during the three months ended March 31, 2010 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
gains (losses) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gains (losses) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
included in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
realized/unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
related to |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assets still |
|
|
|
Balance- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transfer in |
|
|
Balance- |
|
|
held at |
|
|
|
January 1, |
|
|
Included |
|
|
comprehensive |
|
|
|
|
|
|
and/or out of |
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
in earnings |
|
|
income |
|
|
Settlements |
|
|
Level 3(c) |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Investment
securities
available for sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Privately issued
residential
mortgage- backed
securities |
|
$ |
2,064,904 |
|
|
|
(26,447 |
)(a) |
|
|
74,454 |
|
|
|
(93,322 |
) |
|
|
(355,248 |
)(d) |
|
|
1,664,341 |
|
|
|
(26,447 |
)(a) |
Privately
issued commercial
mortgage- backed
securities |
|
|
25,166 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,073 |
|
|
|
(2,114 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,125 |
|
|
|
|
|
Collateralized debt
obligations |
|
|
115,346 |
|
|
|
(355 |
)(a) |
|
|
10,895 |
|
|
|
(131 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
125,755 |
|
|
|
(355 |
)(a) |
Other debt
securities |
|
|
420 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
455 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,205,836 |
|
|
|
(26,802 |
) |
|
|
87,457 |
|
|
|
(95,567 |
) |
|
|
(355,248 |
) |
|
|
1,815,676 |
|
|
|
(26,802 |
) |
Other assets and
other liabilities |
|
|
(80 |
) |
|
|
18,022 |
(b) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,771 |
) |
|
|
8,171 |
|
|
|
7,630 |
(b) |
- 30 -
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED
11. Fair value measurements, continued
The changes in Level 3 assets and liabilities measured at estimated fair value on a recurring
basis during the three months ended March 31, 2009 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
gains (losses) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gains (losses) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
included in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
realized/unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
related to |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in |
|
|
Purchases, |
|
|
Transfer in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
assets still |
|
|
|
Balance- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
other |
|
|
sales, |
|
|
and/or |
|
|
Balance- |
|
|
held at |
|
|
|
January 1, |
|
|
Included |
|
|
comprehensive |
|
|
issuances & |
|
|
out of |
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
in earnings |
|
|
income |
|
|
settlements |
|
|
Level 3(c) |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Investment
securities
available for sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury and
federal agencies |
|
$ |
5,532 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,532 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obligations of
states and
political
subdivisions |
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,143 |
|
|
|
12,182 |
|
|
|
|
|
Government issued
or guaranteed
mortgage- backed
securities |
|
|
84,544 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(84,544 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Privately
issued
residential
mortgage-
backed
securities |
|
|
2,326,554 |
|
|
|
(32,199 |
)(a) |
|
|
177,505 |
|
|
|
(122,457 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,349,403 |
|
|
|
(32,199 |
)(a) |
Privately
issued
commercial
mortgage-
backed
securities |
|
|
41,046 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,262 |
) |
|
|
(5,569 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,215 |
|
|
|
|
|
Collateralized debt
obligations |
|
|
2,496 |
|
|
|
548 |
(a) |
|
|
(75 |
) |
|
|
(548 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,421 |
|
|
|
548 |
(a) |
Equity
securities |
|
|
2,302 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,343 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,462,512 |
|
|
|
(31,651 |
) |
|
|
174,169 |
|
|
|
(128,533 |
) |
|
|
(77,933 |
) |
|
|
2,398,564 |
|
|
|
(31,651 |
) |
Other assets
and other
liabilities |
|
|
8,266 |
|
|
|
27,258 |
(b) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13,487 |
) |
|
|
22,037 |
|
|
|
24,043 |
(b) |
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Reported as an other-than-temporary impairment loss in the consolidated statement
of income or as gain (loss) on bank investment securities. |
|
(b) |
|
Reported as mortgage banking revenues in the consolidated statement of income and includes
the fair value of commitment issuances and expirations. |
|
(c) |
|
The Companys policy for transfers between fair value levels is to recognize the transfer as
of the actual date of the event or change in circumstances that caused the transfer. |
|
(d) |
|
As a result of the Companys adoption of new accounting rules governing the consolidation of
variable interest entities, effective January 1, 2010 the Company derecognized $355 million of
available-for-sale investment securities previously classified as Level 3 measurements.
Further information regarding the Companys adoption of the new accounting requirements is
included in note 10. |
- 31 -
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED
11. Fair value measurements, continued
The Company is required, on a nonrecurring basis, to adjust the carrying value of certain
assets or provide valuation allowances related to certain assets using fair value measurements in
accordance with GAAP.
Loans
Loans are generally not recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. Periodically, the Company
records nonrecurring adjustments to the carrying value of loans based on fair value measurements
for partial charge-offs of the uncollectible portions of those loans. Nonrecurring adjustments also
include certain impairment amounts for collateral-dependent loans when establishing the allowance
for credit losses. Such amounts are generally based on the fair value of the underlying collateral
supporting the loan and, as a result, the carrying value of the loan less the calculated valuation
amount does not necessarily represent the fair value of the loan. Real estate collateral is
typically valued using appraisals or other indications of value based on recent comparable sales of
similar properties or assumptions generally observable in the marketplace and the related
nonrecurring fair value measurement adjustments have generally been classified as Level 2, unless
significant adjustments have been made to the valuation that are not readily observable by market
participants. Estimates of fair value used for other collateral supporting commercial loans
generally are based on assumptions not observable in the marketplace and therefore such valuations
have been classified as Level 3. Loans subject to nonrecurring fair value measurement were $793
million at March 31, 2010, ($471 million and $322 million of which were classified as Level 2 and
Level 3, respectively) and $450 million at March 31, 2009 ($229 million and $221 million of which
were classified as Level 2 and Level 3, respectively). Changes in fair value recognized for
partial charge-offs of loans and loan impairment reserves on loans held by the Company on March 31,
2010 and 2009 were decreases of $58 million and $89 million for the three-month periods ended March
31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
Capitalized servicing rights
Capitalized servicing rights are initially measured at fair value in the Companys consolidated
balance sheet. The Company utilizes the amortization method to subsequently measure its capitalized
servicing assets. In accordance with GAAP, the Company must record impairment charges, on a
nonrecurring basis, when the carrying value of certain strata exceed their estimated fair value. To
estimate the fair value of servicing rights, the Company considers market prices for similar
assets, if available, and the present value of expected future cash flows associated with the
servicing rights calculated using assumptions that market participants would use in estimating
future servicing income and expense. Such assumptions include estimates of the cost of servicing
loans, loan default rates, an appropriate discount rate, and prepayment speeds. For purposes of
evaluating and measuring impairment of capitalized servicing rights, the Company stratifies such
assets based on the predominant risk characteristics of the underlying financial instruments that
are expected to have the most impact on projected prepayments, cost of servicing and other factors
affecting future cash flows associated with the servicing rights. Such factors may include
financial asset or loan type, note rate and term. The amount of impairment recognized is the amount
by which the carrying value of the capitalized servicing rights for a stratum exceed estimated fair
value. Impairment is recognized through a valuation allowance. The determination of fair value of
capitalized servicing rights is considered a Level 3 valuation. At March 31, 2010, no stratum of
capitalized servicing rights had a carrying value equal to its fair value. Changes in the fair
value-based valuation allowance for capitalized servicing rights recognized for the three months
ended March 31, 2010 were insignificant. At March 31, 2009, $44 million of capitalized servicing
rights had a carrying value equal to their fair value. Changes in fair value of capitalized
servicing rights recognized for the three months ended March 31, 2009 were an increase of $5
million.
- 32 -
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED
11. Fair value measurements, continued
Assets taken in foreclosure of defaulted loans
Assets taken in foreclosure of defaulted loans are primarily comprised of commercial and
residential real property and are generally measured at the lower of cost or fair value less costs
to sell. The fair value of the real property is generally determined using appraisals or other
indications of value based on recent comparable sales of similar properties or assumptions
generally observable in the marketplace, and the related nonrecurring fair value measurement
adjustments have generally been classified as Level 2. Assets taken in foreclosure of defaulted
loans subject to nonrecurring fair value measurement during the three months ended March 31, 2010
and 2009 that were still held by the Company as of that date were $17 million and $21 million,
respectively. Changes in fair value recognized for those foreclosed assets held by the Company at
each of March 31, 2010 and 2009 were $10 million.
Disclosures of fair value of financial instruments
With the exception of marketable securities, certain off-balance sheet financial instruments and
one-to-four family residential mortgage loans originated for sale, the Companys financial
instruments are not readily marketable and market prices do not exist. The Company, in attempting
to comply with the provisions of GAAP that require disclosures of fair value of financial
instruments, has not attempted to market its financial instruments to potential buyers, if any
exist. Since negotiated prices in illiquid markets depend greatly upon the then present motivations
of the buyer and seller, it is reasonable to assume that actual sales prices could vary widely from
any estimate of fair value made without the benefit of negotiations. Additionally, changes in
market interest rates can dramatically impact the value of financial instruments in a short period
of time. Additional information about the assumptions and calculations utilized follows.
- 33 -
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED
11. Fair value measurements, continued
The carrying amounts and the calculated estimates of fair value for financial instrument assets (liabilities)
are presented in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Calculated |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Calculated |
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Estimate |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Estimate |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Financial assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
1,043,669 |
|
|
$ |
1,043,669 |
|
|
$ |
1,246,342 |
|
|
$ |
1,246,342 |
|
Interest-bearing deposits at banks |
|
|
121,305 |
|
|
|
121,305 |
|
|
|
133,335 |
|
|
|
133,335 |
|
Trading account assets |
|
|
403,476 |
|
|
|
403,476 |
|
|
|
386,984 |
|
|
|
386,984 |
|
Investment securities |
|
|
8,104,646 |
|
|
|
7,968,513 |
|
|
|
7,780,609 |
|
|
|
7,629,485 |
|
Loans and leases: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial loans and leases |
|
|
13,220,181 |
|
|
|
12,849,919 |
|
|
|
13,479,447 |
|
|
|
13,090,206 |
|
Commercial real estate loans |
|
|
20,724,118 |
|
|
|
20,057,326 |
|
|
|
20,949,931 |
|
|
|
20,426,273 |
|
Residential real estate loans |
|
|
5,664,159 |
|
|
|
5,318,752 |
|
|
|
5,463,463 |
|
|
|
5,058,763 |
|
Consumer loans |
|
|
11,835,583 |
|
|
|
11,423,810 |
|
|
|
12,043,845 |
|
|
|
11,575,525 |
|
Allowance for credit losses |
|
|
(891,265 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(878,022 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans and leases, net |
|
|
50,552,776 |
|
|
|
49,649,807 |
|
|
|
51,058,664 |
|
|
|
50,150,767 |
|
Accrued interest receivable |
|
|
233,111 |
|
|
|
233,111 |
|
|
|
214,692 |
|
|
|
214,692 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest-bearing deposits |
|
$ |
(13,622,819 |
) |
|
$ |
(13,622,819 |
) |
|
$ |
(13,794,636 |
) |
|
$ |
(13,794,636 |
) |
Savings deposits and NOW accounts |
|
|
(26,180,045 |
) |
|
|
(26,180,045 |
) |
|
|
(25,073,269 |
) |
|
|
(25,073,269 |
) |
Time deposits |
|
|
(6,945,716 |
) |
|
|
(7,000,748 |
) |
|
|
(7,531,495 |
) |
|
|
(7,592,214 |
) |
Deposits at foreign office |
|
|
(789,825 |
) |
|
|
(789,825 |
) |
|
|
(1,050,438 |
) |
|
|
(1,050,438 |
) |
Short-term borrowings |
|
|
(1,870,763 |
) |
|
|
(1,870,763 |
) |
|
|
(2,442,582 |
) |
|
|
(2,442,582 |
) |
Long-term borrowings |
|
|
(10,065,894 |
) |
|
|
(9,731,690 |
) |
|
|
(10,240,016 |
) |
|
|
(9,822,153 |
) |
Accrued interest payable |
|
|
(113,983 |
) |
|
|
(113,983 |
) |
|
|
(94,838 |
) |
|
|
(94,838 |
) |
Trading account liabilities |
|
|
(316,026 |
) |
|
|
(316,026 |
) |
|
|
(302,198 |
) |
|
|
(302,198 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other financial instruments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments to originate real
estate loans for sale |
|
$ |
8,171 |
|
|
$ |
8,171 |
|
|
$ |
(80 |
) |
|
$ |
(80 |
) |
Commitments to sell real estate
loans |
|
|
1,897 |
|
|
|
1,897 |
|
|
|
17,771 |
|
|
|
17,771 |
|
Other credit-related commitments |
|
|
(54,962 |
) |
|
|
(54,962 |
) |
|
|
(55,954 |
) |
|
|
(55,954 |
) |
Interest rate swap agreements
used for interest rate risk
management |
|
|
67,092 |
|
|
|
67,092 |
|
|
|
54,486 |
|
|
|
54,486 |
|
The following assumptions, methods and calculations were used in determining the
estimated fair value of financial instruments not measured at fair value in the consolidated
balance sheet.
Cash and cash equivalents, interest-bearing deposits at banks, short-term borrowings, accrued interest receivable and accrued interest payable
Due to the nature of cash and cash equivalents and the near maturity of interest-bearing deposits
at banks, short-term borrowings, accrued interest receivable and accrued interest payable, the
Company estimated that the carrying amount of such instruments approximated estimated fair value.
Investment securities
Estimated fair values of investments in readily marketable securities were generally based on
quoted market prices. Investment securities that were not readily marketable were assigned amounts
based on estimates provided by outside parties or modeling techniques that relied upon discounted
calculations of projected cash flows or, in the case of other investment securities, which include
capital stock of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York and the Federal Home Loan Bank of New York,
at an amount equal to the carrying amount.
- 34 -
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED
11. Fair value measurements, continued
Loans and leases
In general, discount rates used to calculate values for loan products were based on the Companys
pricing at the respective period-end and included appropriate adjustments for expected credit
losses. A higher discount rate was assumed with respect to estimated cash flows associated with
nonaccrual loans. Projected loan cash flows were adjusted for estimated credit losses. However,
such estimates made by the Company may not be indicative of assumptions and adjustments that a
purchaser of the Companys loans and leases would seek.
Deposits
Pursuant to GAAP, the estimated fair value ascribed to noninterest-bearing deposits, savings
deposits and NOW accounts must be established at carrying value because of the customers ability
to withdraw funds immediately. Time deposit accounts are required to be revalued based upon
prevailing market interest rates for similar maturity instruments. As a result, amounts assigned to
time deposits were based on discounted cash flow calculations using prevailing market interest
rates based on the Companys pricing at the respective date for deposits with comparable remaining
terms to maturity.
The Company believes that deposit accounts have a value greater than that prescribed by GAAP.
The Company feels, however, that the value associated with these deposits is greatly influenced by
characteristics of the buyer, such as the ability to reduce the costs of servicing the deposits and
deposit attrition which often occurs following an acquisition.
Long-term borrowings
The amounts assigned to long-term borrowings were based on quoted market prices, when available, or
were based on discounted cash flow calculations using prevailing market interest rates for
borrowings of similar terms and credit risk.
Commitments to originate real estate loans for sale and commitments to sell real estate loans
The Company enters into various commitments to originate real estate loans for sale and commitments
to sell real estate loans. Such commitments are considered to be derivative financial instruments
and, therefore, are carried at estimated fair value on the consolidated balance sheet. The
estimated fair values of such commitments were generally calculated by reference to quoted market
prices for commitments to sell real estate loans to certain government-sponsored entities and other
parties.
Interest rate swap agreements used for interest rate risk management
The estimated fair value of interest rate swap agreements used for interest rate risk management
represents the amount the Company would have expected to receive or pay to terminate such
agreements.
Other commitments and contingencies
As described in note 12, in the normal course of business, various commitments and contingent
liabilities are outstanding, such as loan commitments, credit guarantees and letters of credit. The
Companys pricing of such financial instruments is based largely on credit quality and
relationship, probability of funding and other requirements. Loan commitments often have fixed
expiration dates and contain termination and other clauses which provide for relief from funding in
the event of significant deterioration in the credit quality of the customer. The rates and terms
of the Companys loan commitments, credit guarantees and letters of credit are competitive with
other financial institutions operating in markets served by the Company. The Company believes that
the carrying amounts, which are included in other liabilities, are reasonable estimates of the fair
value of these financial instruments.
- 35 -
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED
11. Fair value measurements, continued
The Company does not believe that the estimated information presented herein is representative
of the earnings power or value of the Company. The preceding analysis, which is inherently limited
in depicting fair value, also does not consider any value associated with existing customer
relationships nor the ability of the Company to create value through loan origination, deposit
gathering or fee generating activities.
Many of the estimates presented herein are based upon the use of highly subjective information
and assumptions and, accordingly, the results may not be precise. Management believes that fair
value estimates may not be comparable between financial institutions due to the wide range of
permitted valuation techniques and numerous estimates which must be made. Furthermore, because the
disclosed fair value amounts were estimated as of the balance sheet date, the amounts actually
realized or paid upon maturity or settlement of the various financial instruments could be
significantly different.
12. Commitments and contingencies
In the normal course of business, various commitments and contingent liabilities are outstanding.
The following table presents the Companys significant commitments. Certain of these commitments
are not included in the Companys consolidated balance sheet.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
|
(in thousands) |
Commitments to extend credit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home equity lines of credit |
|
$ |
6,468,527 |
|
|
|
6,482,987 |
|
Commercial real estate loans
to be sold |
|
|
60,858 |
|
|
|
180,498 |
|
Other commercial real estate
and construction |
|
|
1,377,866 |
|
|
|
1,360,805 |
|
Residential real estate loans
to be sold |
|
|
639,728 |
|
|
|
631,090 |
|
Other residential real estate |
|
|
133,493 |
|
|
|
127,788 |
|
Commercial and other |
|
|
7,162,824 |
|
|
|
7,155,188 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Standby letters of credit |
|
|
3,799,656 |
|
|
|
3,828,586 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial letters of credit |
|
|
68,919 |
|
|
|
66,377 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial guarantees and
indemnification contracts |
|
|
1,727,648 |
|
|
|
1,633,549 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments to sell
real estate loans |
|
|
915,949 |
|
|
|
1,239,001 |
|
Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to customers, generally having fixed
expiration dates or other termination clauses that may require payment of a fee. Standby and
commercial letters of credit are conditional commitments issued to guarantee the performance of a
customer to a third party. Standby letters of credit generally are contingent upon the failure of
the customer to perform according to the terms of the underlying contract with the third party,
whereas commercial letters of credit are issued to facilitate commerce and typically result in the
commitment being funded when the underlying transaction is consummated between the customer and a
third party. The credit risk associated with commitments to extend credit and standby and
commercial letters
- 36 -
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED
12. Commitments and contingencies, continued
of credit is essentially the same as that involved with extending loans to customers and is subject
to normal credit policies. Collateral may be obtained based on managements assessment of the
customers creditworthiness.
Financial guarantees and indemnification contracts are oftentimes similar to standby letters
of credit and include mandatory purchase agreements issued to ensure that customer obligations are
fulfilled, recourse obligations associated with sold loans, and other guarantees of customer
performance or compliance with designated rules and regulations. Included in financial guarantees
and indemnification contracts are loan principal amounts sold with recourse in conjunction with the
Companys involvement in the Fannie Mae Delegated Underwriting and Servicing program. The Companys
maximum credit risk for recourse associated with loans sold under this program totaled
approximately $1.4 billion and $1.3 billion at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively.
Since many loan commitments, standby letters of credit, and guarantees and indemnification
contracts expire without being funded in whole or in part, the contract amounts are not necessarily
indicative of future cash flows.
The Company utilizes commitments to sell real estate loans to hedge exposure to changes in the
fair value of real estate loans held for sale. Such commitments are considered derivatives and
along with commitments to originate real estate loans to be held for sale are recorded in
the consolidated balance sheet at estimated fair market value.
The Company has an agreement with the Baltimore Ravens of the National Football League whereby
the Company obtained the naming rights to a football stadium in Baltimore, Maryland. Under the
agreement, the Company is obligated to pay $5 million per year through 2013 and $6 million per year
from 2014 through 2017.
The Company also has commitments under long-term operating leases.
The Company reinsures credit life and accident and health insurance purchased by consumer loan
customers. The Company also enters into reinsurance contracts with third party insurance companies
who insure against the risk of a mortgage borrowers payment default in connection with certain
mortgage loans originated by the Company. When providing reinsurance coverage, the Company
receives a premium in exchange for accepting a portion of the insurers risk of loss. The
outstanding loan principal balances reinsured by the Company were approximately $94 million at
March 31, 2010. Assets of subsidiaries providing reinsurance that are available to satisfy claims
totaled approximately $74 million at March 31, 2010. The amounts noted above are not necessarily
indicative of losses which may ultimately be incurred. Such losses are expected to be
substantially less because most loans are repaid by borrowers in accordance with the original loan
terms. Management believes any reinsurance losses that may be payable by the Company will not be
material to the Companys consolidated financial position.
The Company is contractually obligated to repurchase previously sold residential mortgage
loans that do not ultimately meet investor sale criteria related to underwriting procedures or loan
documentation. When required to do so, the Company may reimburse loan purchasers for losses
incurred or may repurchase certain loans. The Company reduces residential mortgage banking
revenues by an estimate for losses related to its obligations to loan purchasers. The amount of
those charges is based on the volume of loans sold, the level of reimbursement requests received
from loan purchasers and estimates of losses that
- 37 -
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED
12. Commitments and contingencies, continued
may be associated with previously sold loans. At March 31, 2010, management believes that any
remaining liability arising out of the Companys obligation to loan purchasers is not material to
the Companys consolidated financial position.
M&T and its subsidiaries are subject in the normal course of business to various pending and
threatened legal proceedings in which claims for monetary damages are asserted. Management, after
consultation with legal counsel, does not anticipate that the aggregate ultimate liability arising
out of litigation pending against M&T or its subsidiaries will be material to the Companys
consolidated financial position, but at the present time is not in a position to determine whether
such litigation will have a material adverse effect on the Companys consolidated results of
operations in any future reporting period.
13. Segment information
Reportable segments have been determined based upon the Companys internal profitability reporting
system, which is organized by strategic business unit. Certain strategic business units have been
combined for segment information reporting purposes where the nature of the products and services,
the type of customer and the distribution of those products and services are similar. The
reportable segments are Business Banking, Commercial Banking, Commercial Real Estate, Discretionary
Portfolio, Residential Mortgage Banking and Retail Banking.
The financial information of the Companys segments was compiled utilizing the accounting
policies described in note 22 to the Companys consolidated financial statements as of and for the
year ended December 31, 2009. The management accounting policies and processes utilized in
compiling segment financial information are highly subjective and, unlike financial accounting, are
not based on authoritative guidance similar to GAAP. As a result, the financial information of the
reported segments is not necessarily comparable with similar information reported by other
financial institutions. As also described in note 22 to the Companys 2009 consolidated financial
statements, neither goodwill nor core deposit and other intangible assets (and the amortization
charges associated with such assets) resulting from acquisitions of financial institutions have
been allocated to the Companys reportable segments, but are included in the All Other category.
The Company does, however, assign such intangible assets to business units for purposes of testing
for impairment.
- 38 -
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED
13. Segment information, continued
Information about the Companys segments is presented in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31 |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inter- |
|
|
Net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inter- |
|
|
Net |
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
segment |
|
|
income |
|
|
Total |
|
|
segment |
|
|
income |
|
|
|
revenues(a) |
|
|
revenues |
|
|
(loss) |
|
|
revenues(a) |
|
|
revenues |
|
|
(loss) |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Business
Banking |
|
$ |
101,796 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,344 |
|
|
|
93,635 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,112 |
|
Commercial
Banking |
|
|
192,406 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
76,868 |
|
|
|
165,127 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
57,154 |
|
Commercial
Real Estate |
|
|
110,413 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
43,753 |
|
|
|
88,964 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
42,983 |
|
Discretionary
Portfolio |
|
|
(12,233 |
) |
|
|
(2,747 |
) |
|
|
(16,162 |
) |
|
|
11,298 |
|
|
|
(3,084 |
) |
|
|
(5,089 |
) |
Residential
Mortgage Banking |
|
|
63,117 |
|
|
|
8,197 |
|
|
|
595 |
|
|
|
80,011 |
|
|
|
11,869 |
|
|
|
5,500 |
|
Retail Banking |
|
|
307,475 |
|
|
|
2,687 |
|
|
|
59,037 |
|
|
|
284,652 |
|
|
|
2,655 |
|
|
|
52,363 |
|
All Other |
|
|
51,066 |
|
|
|
(8,155 |
) |
|
|
(38,480 |
) |
|
|
(43,539 |
) |
|
|
(11,446 |
) |
|
|
(118,802 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
814,040 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
150,955 |
|
|
|
680,148 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
64,221 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average total assets |
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Year ended |
|
|
|
March 31 |
|
|
December 31 |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
Business Banking |
|
$ |
4,959 |
|
|
|
4,563 |
|
|
|
4,869 |
|
Commercial Banking |
|
|
15,509 |
|
|
|
15,292 |
|
|
|
15,399 |
|
Commercial Real Estate |
|
|
13,368 |
|
|
|
11,770 |
|
|
|
12,842 |
|
Discretionary
Portfolio |
|
|
14,571 |
|
|
|
13,407 |
|
|
|
13,763 |
|
Residential Mortgage
Banking |
|
|
2,222 |
|
|
|
2,737 |
|
|
|
2,552 |
|
Retail Banking |
|
|
12,272 |
|
|
|
11,169 |
|
|
|
12,024 |
|
All Other |
|
|
5,982 |
|
|
|
5,828 |
|
|
|
6,023 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
68,883 |
|
|
|
64,766 |
|
|
|
67,472 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Total revenues are comprised of net interest income and other income. Net interest income is
the difference between taxable-equivalent interest earned on assets and interest paid on
liabilities owed by a segment and a funding charge (credit) based on the Companys internal
funds transfer and allocation methodology. Segments are charged a cost to fund any assets |
- 39 -
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED
13. Segment information, continued
(e.g. loans) and are paid a funding credit for any funds provided (e.g. deposits). The
taxable-equivalent adjustment aggregated $5,923,000 and $4,933,000 for the three-month
periods ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively, and is eliminated in All Other total
revenues. Intersegment revenues are included in total revenues of the reportable segments.
The elimination of intersegment revenues is included in the determination of All Other
total revenues.
14. Relationship with Bayview Lending Group LLC and Bayview Financial Holdings, L.P.
In 2007, M&T invested $300 million to acquire a 20% minority interest in Bayview Lending Group LLC
(BLG), a privately-held commercial mortgage lender. M&T recognizes income from BLG using the
equity method of accounting. The carrying value of that investment was $240 million at March 31,
2010.
Bayview Financial Holdings, L.P. (together with its affiliates, Bayview Financial), a
privately-held specialty mortgage finance company, is BLGs majority investor. In addition to
their common investment in BLG, the Company and Bayview Financial conduct other business activities
with each other. The Company has obtained loan servicing rights for small-balance commercial
mortgage loans from BLG and Bayview Financial having outstanding principal balances of $5.8 billion
and $5.5 billion at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively. Amounts recorded as
capitalized servicing assets for such loans totaled $36 million at March 31, 2010 and $40 million
at December 31, 2009. In addition, capitalized servicing rights at March 31, 2010 and December 31,
2009 also included $15 million and $17 million, respectively, for servicing rights that were
obtained from Bayview Financial related to residential mortgage loans with outstanding principal
balances of $4.0 billion at March 31, 2010 and $4.1 billion at December 31, 2009. Revenues from
servicing residential and small-balance commercial mortgage loans obtained from BLG and Bayview
Financial were $12 million and $13 million during the quarters ended March 31, 2010 and 2009,
respectively. M&T Bank provided $10 million and $34 million of credit facilities to Bayview
Financial at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively, of which $10 million and $24
million was outstanding at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively. In addition, at
each of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the Company held $25 million of collateralized
mortgage obligations in its available-for-sale investment securities portfolio that were
securitized by Bayview Financial. Finally, the Company held $342 million and $352 million of
similar investment securities in its held-to-maturity portfolio at March 31, 2010 and December 31,
2009, respectively.
15. Relationship of M&T and AIB
AIB received 26,700,000 shares of M&T common stock on April 1, 2003 as a result of M&Ts
acquisition of a subsidiary of AIB on that date. Those shares of common stock owned by AIB
represented 22.5% of the issued and outstanding shares of M&T common stock on March 31, 2010. While
AIB maintains a significant ownership in M&T, the Agreement and Plan of Reorganization between M&T
and AIB (Reorganization Agreement) includes several provisions related to the corporate
governance of M&T that provide AIB with representation on the M&T and M&T Bank boards of directors
and key board committees and certain protections of its rights as a substantial M&T shareholder. In
addition, AIB has rights that facilitate its ability to maintain its proportionate ownership
position in M&T.
- 40 -
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED
15. Relationship of M&T and AIB, continued
With respect to AIBs right to have representation on the M&T and M&T Bank boards of directors
and key board committees, for as long as AIB holds at least 15% of M&Ts outstanding common stock,
AIB is entitled to designate four individuals, reasonably acceptable to M&T, on both the M&T and
M&T Bank boards of directors. In addition, one of the AIB designees to the M&T board of directors
will serve on each of the Executive; Nomination, Compensation and Governance; and Audit and Risk
committees. Also, as long as AIB holds at least 15% of M&Ts outstanding common stock, neither the
M&T nor the M&T Bank board of directors may consist of more than 28 directors without the consent
of the M&T directors designated by AIB. AIB will continue to enjoy these rights if its holdings of
M&T common stock drop below 15%, but not below 12%, so long as AIB restores its ownership
percentage to 15% within one year. In the event that AIB holds at least 10%, but less than 15%, of
M&Ts outstanding common stock, AIB will be entitled to designate at least two individuals on both
the M&T and M&T Bank boards of directors and, in the event that AIB holds at least 5%, but less
than 10%, of M&Ts outstanding common stock, AIB will be entitled to designate one individual on
both the M&T and M&T Bank boards of directors. M&T also has the right to appoint one representative
to the AIB board while AIB remains a significant shareholder.
There are several other corporate governance provisions that serve to protect AIBs rights as
a substantial M&T shareholder and are embodied in M&Ts certificate of incorporation and bylaws.
These protections include an effective consent right in connection with certain actions by M&T,
such as amending M&Ts certificate of incorporation or bylaws in a manner inconsistent with AIBs
rights, engaging in activities not permissible for a bank holding company or adopting any
shareholder rights plan or other measures intended to prevent or delay any transaction involving a
change in control of M&T. AIB has the right to limit, with the agreement of at least one non-AIB
designee on the M&T board of directors, other actions by M&T, such as reducing M&Ts cash dividend
policy such that the ratio of cash dividends to net income is less than 15%, acquisitions and
dispositions of significant amounts of assets, and the appointment or election of the chairman of
the board of directors or the chief executive officer of M&T. The protective provisions described
above will cease to be applicable when AIB no longer owns at least 15% of M&Ts outstanding common
stock, calculated as described in the Reorganization Agreement.
In an effort to raise its capital position to meet new Irish government-mandated capital
requirements, AIB announced in March 2010 that it plans to sell its ownership interest in M&T by
the end of 2010.
- 41 -
|
|
|
Item 2. |
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations. |
Overview
M&T Bank Corporation (M&T) recorded net income in the first quarter of 2010 of $151 million
or $1.15 of diluted earnings per common share, compared with $64 million or $.49 of diluted
earnings per common share in the first quarter of 2009. During the fourth quarter of 2009, net
income totaled $137 million or $1.04 of diluted earnings per common share. Basic earnings per
common share were $1.16 in the initial 2010 quarter, compared with $.49 and $1.05 in the first and
fourth quarters of 2009, respectively. The after-tax impact of acquisition and integration-related
expenses (included herein as merger-related expenses) associated with M&Ts May 23, 2009
acquisition of Provident Bankshares Corporation (Provident) was $1 million ($2 million pre-tax),
or $.01 of basic and diluted earnings per common share in the initial quarter of 2009.
Merger-related expenses in the fourth quarter of 2009 aggregated $4 million ($6 million pre-tax) or
$.03 of basic and diluted earnings per common share. Such expenses related to the acquisition of
Provident and to the August 28, 2009 agreement between the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
(FDIC) and M&T Bank, the principal banking subsidiary of M&T, for M&T Bank to assume all of the
deposits and acquire certain assets of Bradford Bank (Bradford). There were no merger-related
expenses in 2010s initial quarter.
The annualized rate of return on average total assets for M&T and its consolidated
subsidiaries (the Company) in the first quarter of 2010 was .89%, compared with .40% in the
year-earlier quarter and .79% in the fourth quarter of 2009. The annualized rate of return on
average common stockholders equity was 7.86% in the first three months of 2010, compared with
3.61% and 7.09% in the first and fourth quarters of 2009, respectively.
The condition of the residential real estate marketplace and the U.S. economy has had a
significant impact on the financial services industry as a whole, and specifically on the financial
results of the Company. A pronounced downturn in the residential real estate market that began in
early 2007 has resulted in significantly lower residential real estate values and higher
delinquencies and charge-offs of loans, including loans to builders and developers of residential
real estate. In addition, the U.S. economy was in recession during 2008 and 2009, and high
unemployment continues to hinder a recovery. As a result, the Company experienced higher than
historical levels of delinquencies and charge-offs related to its commercial loan and commercial
real estate loan portfolios during 2009 and early 2010 as well. Investment securities backed by
residential and commercial real estate have reflected substantial unrealized losses during the real
estate downturn due to a lack of liquidity in the financial markets and anticipated credit losses.
Many financial institutions, including the Company, have taken charges for those unrealized losses
that were deemed to be other than temporary.
Reflected in M&Ts first quarter 2010 results were $16 million of after-tax
other-than-temporary impairment charges ($27 million before taxes) on certain available-for-sale
investment securities, reducing diluted earnings per common share by $.14. Specifically, such
charges related to certain privately issued collateralized mortgage obligations (CMOs) backed by residential real
estate loans. However, because those investment securities were previously reflected at fair
values on the consolidated balance sheet, the impairment charges did not reduce stockholders
equity.
The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) amended generally accepted accounting
principles (GAAP) in June 2009 relating to: (1) the consolidation of variable interest
entities to eliminate the quantitative approach previously required for determining the
primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity; and (2) accounting for transfers of
financial
- 42 -
assets to eliminate the exceptions for qualifying special purpose entities from the
consolidation guidance and the exception that permitted sale accounting for certain mortgage
securitizations when a transferor has not surrendered control over the transferred assets.
The amended guidance became effective as of January 1, 2010. The recognition and measurement
provisions of the amended guidance were applied to transfers that occur on or after the
effective date. Additionally, beginning January 1, 2010, the concept of a qualifying
special-purpose entity is no longer relevant for accounting purposes. Therefore, formerly
qualifying special-purpose entities must now be evaluated for consolidation in accordance with
applicable consolidation guidance, including the new accounting guidance relating to the
consolidation of variable interest entities.
In accordance with the new accounting requirements, effective January 1, 2010 the Company
includes in its consolidated financial statements one-to-four family residential mortgage loans
that were included in two separate non-recourse securitization transactions using qualified special
trusts. The effect of that consolidation was to increase residential real estate loans by $424
million, decrease the amortized cost of available-for-sale investment securities by $360 million
(fair value of $355 million as of January 1, 2010), and increase borrowings by $65 million.
Information concerning these securitization transactions is included in note 10 of Notes to
Financial Statements.
The Companys financial results for the first quarter of 2009 were significantly affected
by the recessionary state of the U.S. economy and the deterioration of residential real estate
values throughout much of the country. Specifically, the provision for credit losses rose to $158
million, its highest level ever, and net loan charge-offs totaled $100 million in the first quarter
of 2009. The excess of that quarters provision above net charge-offs was deemed necessary due
largely to a commercial loan transferred to nonaccrual status during the initial 2009 quarter for
which the full collectibility was in question. During the second quarter of 2009, $33 million of
that loan was charged off. After-tax other-than-temporary impairment charges of $20 million ($32
million before taxes), or $.18 of diluted earnings per common share, were recorded during the
initial quarter of 2009 on privately issued CMOs. Those securities, which are collateralized by
residential real estate loans, are held in the Companys available-for-sale investment securities
portfolio.
The Company also recorded after-tax other-than-temporary impairment charges of $21 million
($34 million before taxes), or $.18 of diluted earnings per common share, in the final quarter of
2009 related to certain privately issued CMOs and collateralized debt obligations (CDOs). The
Company continues to hold those bonds in its available-for-sale investment securities portfolio.
Supplemental Reporting of Non-GAAP Results of Operations
As a result of business combinations and other acquisitions, the Company had intangible assets
consisting of goodwill and core deposit and other intangible assets totaling $3.7 billion at each
of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, compared with $3.4 billion at March 31, 2009. Included in
such intangible assets was goodwill of $3.5 billion at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 and
$3.2 billion at March 31, 2009. Amortization of core deposit and other intangible assets, after
tax effect, was $10 million ($.08 per diluted common share) during the initial quarter of 2010, $9
million ($.09 per diluted common share) during the year-earlier quarter and $10 million ($.09 per
diluted common share) in the fourth quarter of 2009.
M&T consistently provides supplemental reporting of its results on a net operating or
tangible basis, from which M&T excludes the after-tax effect of amortization of core deposit and
other intangible assets (and the
- 43 -
related goodwill, core deposit intangible and other intangible
asset balances, net of applicable deferred tax amounts) and gains and expenses associated with
merging acquired operations into the Company, since such items are considered by management to be
nonoperating in nature. Although net operating income as defined by M&T is not a GAAP measure,
M&Ts management believes that this information helps investors understand the effect of
acquisition activity in reported results.
Net operating income totaled $161 million in the first quarter of 2010, compared with $75
million in the year-earlier quarter. Diluted net operating earnings per common share for the
recent quarter were $1.23, compared with $.59 in the initial 2009 quarter. Net operating income
and diluted net operating earnings per common share were $151 million and $1.16, respectively, in
the fourth quarter of 2009.
Net operating income in the first quarter of 2010 represented an annualized rate of
return on average tangible assets of 1.00%, compared with .50% and .92% in the first and fourth
quarters of 2009, respectively. Net operating income expressed as an annualized return on average
tangible common equity was 17.34% in the recently completed quarter, compared with 9.36% in the
year-earlier quarter and 16.73% in the final quarter of 2009.
Reconciliations of GAAP results with non-GAAP results are provided in table 2.
Taxable-equivalent Net Interest Income
Taxable-equivalent net interest income aggregated $562 million in the first quarter of 2010, up 24%
from $453 million in the corresponding 2009 quarter but down slightly from $565 million in the
fourth quarter of 2009. The improvement in the recent quarters total as compared with the first
quarter of 2009 reflects a 59 basis point (hundredths of one percent) widening of the Companys net
interest margin, or taxable-equivalent net interest income expressed as an annualized percentage of
average earning assets, and higher average earning assets, which rose $2.8 billion, or 5%, to $60.3
billion from $57.5 billion in the first quarter of 2009. The slight decline in net interest income
from the fourth quarter of 2009 reflects the impact of fewer days in the recent quarter, offset, in
part, by a 7 basis point widening of the net interest margin. The net interest margin was 3.78% in
the initial 2010 quarter, compared with 3.19% in the year-earlier period and 3.71% in the fourth quarter of 2009.
Average loans and leases rose $3.1 billion, or 6%, to $51.9 billion in the first quarter of
2010 from $48.8 billion in 2009s initial quarter. Included in average loans and leases in the
recent quarter were loans obtained in the Provident and Bradford acquisition transactions. Loans
associated with Provident totaled $4.0 billion on the May 23, 2009 acquisition date and loans
associated with Bradford totaled $302 million on the August 28, 2009 closing date of that
transaction. In total, the acquired loans consisted of approximately $700 million of commercial
loans, $1.8 billion of commercial real estate loans, $400 million of residential real estate loans
and $1.4 billion of consumer loans. Including the impact of the acquired loan balances, commercial
loans and leases averaged $13.4 billion in the first 2010 quarter, down 4% from $14.0 billion in
the year-earlier quarter. That decline was the result of generally lower demand for commercial
loans. Average commercial real estate loans rose $2.1 billion or 11% to $20.9 billion in the
recent quarter from $18.8 billion in the first quarter
- 44 -
of 2009. The Companys residential real
estate loan portfolio averaged $5.7 billion in 2010s initial quarter, up $708 million or 14% from
$5.0 billion in the corresponding quarter of 2009. Included in that portfolio were loans held for
sale, which averaged $404 million in the recently completed quarter, compared with $548 million in
the first quarter of 2009. Also reflected in average residential real estate loans in the first
quarter of 2010 were $416 million of loans related to the implementation of the new accounting
requirements previously discussed. Excluding such loans and loans held for sale, average
residential real estate loans increased $436 million from the first quarter of 2009 to the first
quarter of 2010. Average consumer loans and leases totaled $11.9 billion in the recent quarter, up
$966 million or 9% from $11.0 billion in the year-earlier period. That growth was due to loans
obtained from Provident and Bradford (largely home equity loans and lines of credit) and higher
outstanding balances of legacy home equity lines of credit, partially offset by declines in average
outstanding automobile loan balances.
After excluding the loans recorded as a result of the new accounting requirements
effective January 1, 2010, average loan balances in the recent quarter declined $556 million, or
1%, from the fourth quarter of 2009. Relatively modest changes were experienced in each of the
major loan categories during the recent quarter as compared with the final quarter of 2009.
Although the Company has experienced sluggish borrower demand for loans, certain of the loan
portfolios have been allowed to decline where the Company has decided it does not want to pursue
growth. Examples of those portfolios include residential real estate construction loans, Alt-A
residential mortgage loans, indirect automobile loans outside of the Companys footprint and
out-of-footprint home equity loans. The accompanying table summarizes quarterly changes in the
major components of the loan and lease portfolio.
AVERAGE LOANS AND LEASES
(net of unearned discount)
Dollars in millions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent increase |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(decrease) from |
|
|
|
1st Qtr. |
|
|
1st Qtr. |
|
|
4th Qtr. |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Commercial, financial, etc. |
|
$ |
13,408 |
|
|
|
(4 |
)% |
|
|
(1 |
)% |
Real estate commercial |
|
|
20,867 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate consumer |
|
|
5,742 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
Consumer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Automobile |
|
|
2,898 |
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
Home equity lines |
|
|
5,851 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
Home equity loans |
|
|
949 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
Other |
|
|
2,233 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total consumer |
|
|
11,931 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
51,948 |
|
|
|
6 |
% |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The investment securities portfolio averaged $8.2 billion during the initial quarter of 2010,
down from $8.5 billion in the first quarter of 2009 but little changed from 2009s final quarter.
The decline in such securities from the first quarter of 2009 largely reflects maturities and
paydowns of mortgage-backed securities, maturities of federal agency notes and the impact of
adopting the new accounting rules on January 1, 2010 as already noted, partially offset by
investment securities obtained in the acquisition of Provident and recent-quarter purchases of $961
million of mortgage-backed securities issued by the Federal National Mortgage Association (Fannie
Mae) and the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (Freddie Mac). As compared with the fourth
quarter of 2009, the recent quarter purchases were largely offset by maturities and paydowns of
mortgage-backed securities and the impact of the change in accounting requirements. The investment
securities portfolio is largely comprised of residential mortgage-backed securities and CMOs, debt
securities issued by municipalities, debt and preferred equity securities issued by
government-sponsored agencies and certain financial institutions, and shorter-term U.S. Treasury
and federal agency notes. When purchasing investment securities, the Company considers its overall
interest-rate risk profile as well as the adequacy of expected returns relative to risks assumed,
including prepayments. In managing its investment securities portfolio, the Company occasionally
sells investment securities as a result
- 45 -
of changes in interest rates and spreads, actual or
anticipated prepayments, credit risk associated with a particular security, or as a result of
restructuring its investment securities portfolio following completion of a business combination.
The Company regularly reviews its investment securities for declines in value below amortized
cost that might be characterized as other than temporary. As previously discussed, an
other-than-temporary impairment charge of $27 million (pre-tax) was recognized in the first quarter
of 2010 related to certain privately issued CMOs held in the Companys available-for-sale
investment securities portfolio. Other-than-temporary impairment charges of $32 million (pre-tax)
and $34 million (pre-tax) were recognized during the initial quarter of 2009 and the fourth quarter
of 2009, respectively. Those charges were also largely related to the Companys available-for-sale
portfolio of privately issued residential CMOs. Poor economic conditions, high unemployment and
depressed real estate values are significant factors contributing to the recognition of the
other-than-temporary impairment charges. Based on managements assessment of future cash flows
associated with individual investment securities, as of March 31, 2010 the Company concluded that
the remaining declines associated with the rest of the investment securities portfolio were
temporary in nature. A further discussion of fair values of investment securities is included
herein under the heading Capital. Additional information about the investment securities
portfolio is included in notes 3 and 11 of Notes to Financial Statements.
Other earning assets include deposits at banks, trading account assets, federal funds
sold and agreements to resell securities. Those other earning assets in the aggregate averaged
$211 million in the recently completed quarter, compared with $195 million and $167 million in the
first and fourth quarters of 2009, respectively. The amounts of investment securities and other
earning assets held by the Company are influenced by such factors as demand for loans, which
generally yield more than investment securities and other earning assets, ongoing repayments, the
level of deposits, and management of balance sheet size and resulting capital ratios.
As a result of the changes described herein, average earning assets aggregated $60.3
billion in the first quarter of 2010, compared with $57.5 billion in the similar 2009 quarter.
Average earning assets aggregated $60.5 billion in the fourth quarter of 2009.
The most significant source of funding for the Company is core deposits, which are
comprised of noninterest-bearing deposits, interest-bearing transaction accounts, savings deposits
and domestic time deposits under $100,000. The Companys branch network is its principal source of
core deposits, which generally carry lower interest rates than wholesale funds of comparable
maturities. Certificates of deposit under $100,000 generated on a nationwide basis by M&T Bank,
National Association (M&T Bank, N.A.), a wholly owned bank subsidiary of M&T, are also included
in core deposits. Core deposits averaged $42.9 billion in the first quarter of 2010, up 24% from
$34.7 billion in the corresponding 2009 quarter and 1% higher than $42.3 billion in the fourth
quarter of 2009. The 2009 acquisition transactions added $3.8 billion of core deposits on the
respective acquisition dates. Excluding deposits obtained in those transactions, the growth in
core deposits since the first quarter of 2009 was due, in part, to the lack of attractiveness to
the Companys customers of alternative investments resulting from lower interest rates and the
recessionary environment in the U.S. The continuing low interest rate environment has resulted in
a shift in customer savings trends, as average time deposits have continued to decline, while
average noninterest-bearing deposits and savings deposits have increased. The following table
provides an analysis of quarterly changes in the components of average core deposits.
- 46 -
AVERAGE CORE DEPOSITS
Dollars in millions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent increase |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(decrease) from |
|
|
|
1st Qtr. |
|
|
1st Qtr. |
|
|
4th Qtr. |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2009 |
|
NOW accounts |
|
$ |
579 |
|
|
|
13 |
% |
|
|
1 |
% |
Savings deposits |
|
|
24,396 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
Time deposits less than $100,000 |
|
|
4,662 |
|
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
(9 |
) |
Noninterest-bearing deposits |
|
|
13,294 |
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
42,931 |
|
|
|
24 |
% |
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In addition to core deposits, domestic time deposits of $100,000 or more, deposits originated
through the Companys offshore branch office, and brokered deposits provide sources of funding for
the Company. Domestic time deposits over $100,000, excluding brokered certificates of deposit,
averaged $1.8 billion during the first quarter of 2010, compared with $3.0 billion and $2.2 billion
in the first and fourth quarters of 2009, respectively. Offshore branch deposits, primarily
comprised of accounts with balances of $100,000 or more, averaged $1.2 billion, $2.5 billion and
$1.3 billion for the quarters ended March 31, 2010, March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2009,
respectively. Average brokered time deposits totaled $785 million during the recently completed
quarter, compared with $435 million and $1.0 billion in the first and fourth quarters of 2009,
respectively. Reflected in average brokered time deposits in the first quarter of 2010 and in the
fourth quarter of 2009 were approximately $740 million and $889 million, respectively, of deposits
obtained in the Provident transaction. In connection with the Companys management of interest
rate risk, interest rate swap agreements have been entered into under which the Company receives a
fixed rate of interest and pays a variable rate and that have notional amounts and terms substantially similar to the amounts and terms
of $25 million of brokered time deposits. The Company also had brokered NOW and brokered
money-market deposit accounts which in the aggregate averaged $678 million during the first quarter
of 2010, compared with $894 million in the year-earlier quarter and $586 million in the fourth
quarter of 2009. Offshore branch deposits and brokered deposits have been used by the Company as
alternatives to short-term borrowings. Additional amounts of offshore branch deposits or brokered
deposits may be added in the future depending on market conditions, including demand by customers
and other investors for those deposits, and the cost of funds available from alternative sources at
the time.
The Company also uses borrowings from banks, securities dealers, various Federal Home
Loan Banks (FHLBs), the Federal Reserve and others as sources of funding. Short-term borrowings
averaged $2.4 billion in the initial 2010 quarter, compared with $3.5 billion in the year-earlier
quarter and $2.3 billion in the fourth quarter of 2009. Included in short-term borrowings were
unsecured federal funds borrowings, which generally mature on the next business day, that averaged
$2.1 billion in the recent quarter, compared with $1.8 billion and $2.0 billion in the first and
fourth quarters of 2009, respectively. Overnight federal funds borrowings represented the largest
component of short-term borrowings and are obtained from a wide variety of banks and other
financial institutions. Average short-term borrowings included
borrowings from the FHLB of New York and the FHLB of Atlanta which
totaled $100 million during the recent quarter, compared with $1.0 billion
and $186 million in the first and fourth quarters of 2009, respectively. Also included in
short-term borrowings were secured borrowings with the Federal Reserve through their Term Auction
Facility (TAF). Borrowings under the TAF averaged $467 million during the three-month period
ended March 31, 2009, while there were no such outstanding borrowings during the quarters ended
March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009.
Long-term borrowings averaged $10.2 billion in the first quarter of 2010, compared with
$11.6 billion in the corresponding 2009 quarter and $10.3 billion in the final quarter of 2009.
Included in average long-term borrowings were amounts borrowed from the FHLBs of $5.1 billion in
the initial quarter of 2010,
- 47 -
and $6.7 billion and $5.3 billion in the first and fourth quarters of
2009, respectively, and subordinated capital notes of $1.9 billion in each of the quarters ended
March 31, 2010, March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2009. Junior subordinated debentures associated
with trust preferred securities that were included in average long-term borrowings were $1.2
billion in each of the first quarter of 2010 and the fourth quarter of 2009, compared with $1.1
billion in the first quarter of 2009. Information regarding trust preferred securities and the
related junior subordinated debentures is provided in note 4 of Notes to Financial Statements.
Also included in long-term borrowings were agreements to repurchase securities, which averaged $1.6
billion during each of the first quarters of 2010 and 2009 and the fourth quarter of 2009. The
agreements have various repurchase dates through 2017, however, the contractual maturities of the
underlying securities extend beyond such repurchase dates.
Changes in the composition of the Companys earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities,
as described herein, as well as changes in interest rates and spreads, can impact net interest
income. Net interest spread, or the difference between the taxable-equivalent yield on earning
assets and the rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities, was 3.55% in the first quarter of 2010
and 2.91% in the year-earlier quarter. The yield on earning assets during the recent quarter was
4.59%, down 6 basis points from 4.65% in the first quarter of 2009, while the rate paid on
interest-bearing liabilities decreased 70 basis points to 1.04% from 1.74%. In the fourth quarter
of 2009, the net interest spread was 3.45%, the yield on earning assets was 4.58% and the rate
paid on interest-bearing liabilities was 1.13%. The significant improvement in the net
interest spread in the two most recent quarters as compared with the first quarter of 2009 was due
largely to declines in the rates paid on deposits and long-term borrowings. Those lower rates
reflect the impact of the stagnant economy and the Federal Reserves monetary policies on both
short-term and long-term interest rates. In addition, the Federal Open Market Committee noted in
January 2010 that low rates of resource utilization, subdued inflation trends, and stable inflation
expectations were likely to warrant exceptionally low levels of the federal funds rate for an
extended period of time.
Net interest-free funds consist largely of noninterest-bearing demand deposits and
stockholders equity, partially offset by bank owned life insurance and non-earning assets,
including goodwill, core deposit and other intangible assets. Net interest-free funds averaged
$13.7 billion in the first quarter of 2010, compared with $9.5 billion and $13.5 billion in the
first and fourth quarters of 2009, respectively. The rise in net interest free funds in the two
most recent quarters as compared with the first quarter of 2009 was largely the result of higher
average balances of noninterest-bearing deposits. Such deposits averaged $13.3 billion in the
recent quarter, compared with $8.6 billion and $12.9 billion in the first and fourth quarters of
2009, respectively. In connection with the Provident and Bradford transactions, the Company added
noninterest-bearing deposits totaling $946 million at the respective acquisition dates. Goodwill
and core deposit and other intangible assets averaged $3.7 billion during each of the quarters
ended March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, compared with $3.4 billion during the quarter ended
March 31, 2009. The cash surrender value of bank owned life insurance averaged $1.5 billion in the
two most recent quarters and $1.2 billion in the initial 2009 quarter. Increases in the cash
surrender value of bank owned life insurance and benefits received are not included in interest
income, but rather are recorded in other revenues from operations.
The contribution of net interest-free funds to net interest margin was .23% in the recent
quarter, compared with .28% in the first quarter of 2009 and .26% in 2009s final quarter. The
decrease in the contribution to net interest margin ascribed to net interest-free funds in the
recent quarter as compared with the first and fourth quarters of 2009 resulted largely from the
impact of lower interest rates on interest-bearing liabilities used to value such contribution.
- 48 -
Reflecting the changes to the net interest spread and the contribution of interest-free funds
as described herein, the Companys net interest margin was 3.78% in the first quarter of 2010,
compared with 3.19% in the year-earlier quarter and 3.71% in the fourth quarter of 2009. Future
changes in market interest rates or spreads, as well as changes in the composition of the Companys
portfolios of earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities that result in reductions in spreads,
could adversely impact the Companys net interest income and net interest margin.
Management assesses the potential impact of future changes in interest rates and spreads
by projecting net interest income under several interest rate scenarios. In managing interest rate
risk, the Company utilizes interest rate swap agreements to modify the repricing characteristics of
certain portions of its portfolios of earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities. Periodic
settlement amounts arising from these agreements are generally reflected in either the yields
earned on assets or the rates paid on interest-bearing liabilities. The notional amount of
interest rate swap agreements entered into for interest rate risk management purposes was approximately $1.1
billion at each of March 31, 2010, March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2009. Under the terms of those
swap agreements, the Company received payments based on the outstanding notional amount at fixed
rates and made payments at variable rates. Those swap agreements were designated as fair value
hedges of certain fixed rate time deposits and long-term borrowings. There were no interest rate
swap agreements designated as cash flow hedges at those respective dates.
In a fair value hedge, the fair value of the derivative (the interest rate swap agreement) and
changes in the fair value of the hedged item are recorded in the Companys consolidated balance
sheet with the corresponding gain or loss recognized in current earnings. The difference between
changes in the fair value of the interest rate swap agreements and the hedged items represents
hedge ineffectiveness and is recorded in other revenues from operations in the Companys
consolidated statement of income. In a cash flow hedge, unlike in a fair value hedge, the
effective portion of the derivatives gain or loss is initially reported as a component of other
comprehensive income and subsequently reclassified into earnings when the forecasted transaction
affects earnings. The ineffective portion of the gain or loss is reported in other revenues from
operations immediately. The amounts of hedge ineffectiveness recognized during the quarters ended
March 31, 2010 and 2009 and the quarter ended December 31, 2009 were not material to the Companys
results of operations. The estimated aggregate fair value of interest rate swap agreements
designated as fair value hedges represented gains of approximately $67 million at March 31, 2010,
$125 million at March 31, 2009 and $54 million at December 31, 2009. The fair values of such swap
agreements were substantially offset by changes in the fair values of the hedged items. The
changes in the fair values of the interest rate swap agreements and the hedged items primarily
result from the effects of changing interest rates and spreads. The Companys credit exposure as
of March 31, 2010 with respect to the estimated fair value of interest rate swap agreements used
for managing interest rate risk has been substantially mitigated through master netting
arrangements with trading account interest rate contracts with the same counterparty as well as
counterparty postings of $47 million of collateral with the Company.
The weighted-average rates to be received and paid under interest rate swap agreements
currently in effect were 6.30% and 2.07%, respectively, at March 31, 2010. The average notional
amounts of interest rate swap agreements entered into for interest rate risk management purposes,
the related effect on net interest income and margin, and the weighted-average rates paid or
received on those swap agreements are presented in the accompanying table. Additional information
about the Companys use of interest rate swap agreements and other derivatives is included in note
9 of Notes to Financial Statements.
- 49 -
INTEREST RATE SWAP AGREEMENTS
Dollars in thousands
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31 |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Rate(a) |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Rate(a) |
|
Increase (decrease) in: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
% |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
% |
Interest expense |
|
|
(11,252 |
) |
|
|
(.10 |
) |
|
|
(7,415 |
) |
|
|
(.06 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest
income/margin |
|
$ |
11,252 |
|
|
|
.08 |
% |
|
$ |
7,415 |
|
|
|
.05 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average notional
amount |
|
$ |
1,062,241 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,107,241 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rate received (b) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.39 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.34 |
% |
Rate paid (b) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.10 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.63 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Computed as an annualized percentage of average earning assets or
interest-bearing liabilities. |
|
(b) |
|
Weighted-average rate paid or received on interest rate swap
agreements in effect during the period. |
As a financial intermediary, the Company is exposed to various risks, including liquidity
and market risk. Liquidity refers to the Companys ability to ensure that sufficient cash flow and
liquid assets are available to satisfy current and future obligations, including demands for loans
and deposit withdrawals, funding operating costs, and other corporate purposes. Liquidity risk
arises whenever the maturities of financial instruments included in assets and liabilities differ.
M&Ts banking subsidiaries have access to additional funding sources through borrowings from the
FHLB of New York, lines of credit with the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, and other available
borrowing facilities. The Company has, from time to time, issued subordinated capital notes to
provide liquidity and enhance regulatory capital ratios. Such notes qualify for inclusion in the
Companys total capital as defined by Federal regulators.
The Company has informal and sometimes reciprocal sources of funding available through various
arrangements for unsecured short-term borrowings from a wide group of banks and other financial
institutions. Short-term federal funds borrowings were $1.7 billion at March 31, 2010, $1.4
billion at March 31, 2009 and $2.1 billion at December 31, 2009. In general, those borrowings were
unsecured and matured on the next business day. As previously noted, offshore branch deposits and
brokered certificates of deposit have been used by the Company as an alternative to short-term
borrowings. Offshore branch deposits also generally mature on the next business day and totaled
$790 million, $2.2 billion and $1.1 billion at March 31, 2010, March 31, 2009 and December 31,
2009, respectively. Outstanding brokered time deposits at March 31, 2010, March 31, 2009 and
December 31, 2009 were $732 million, $262 million and $868 million, respectively. Such deposits at
March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 included $692 million and $813 million, respectively, of
brokered time deposits obtained in the acquisition of Provident. At March 31, 2010, the
weighted-average remaining term to maturity of brokered time deposits was 22 months. Certain of
these brokered time deposits have provisions that allow for early redemption. The Company also had
brokered NOW and brokered money-market deposit accounts which aggregated $942 million, $941 million
and $618 million at March 31, 2010, March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2009, respectively.
The Companys ability to obtain funding from these or other sources could be negatively
impacted should the Company experience a substantial deterioration in its financial condition or
its debt ratings, or should the availability of short-term funding become restricted due to a
disruption in the financial markets. The Company attempts to quantify such credit-event risk by
modeling scenarios that estimate the liquidity impact resulting from a short-term ratings downgrade
over various grading levels. Such impact is
- 50 -
estimated by attempting to measure the effect on
available unsecured lines of credit, available capacity from secured borrowing sources and
securitizable assets. In addition to deposits and borrowings, other sources of liquidity include
maturities of investment securities and other earning assets, repayments of loans and investment
securities, and cash generated from operations, such as fees collected for services.
Certain customers of the Company obtain financing through the issuance
of variable rate demand bonds (VRDBs). The VRDBs are generally enhanced by direct-pay
letters of credit provided by M&T Bank. M&T Bank oftentimes acts as remarketing agent for the
VRDBs and, at its discretion, may from time-to-time own some of the VRDBs while such instruments
are remarketed. When this occurs, the VRDBs are classified as trading assets in the Companys
consolidated balance sheet. Nevertheless, M&T Bank is not contractually obligated to purchase the
VRDBs. The value of VRDBs in the Companys trading account totaled $20 million at March 31, 2010,
$31 million at March 31, 2009 and $19 million at December 31, 2009. The total amount of VRDBs
outstanding backed by M&T Bank letters of credit was $1.9 billion at each of March 31, 2010 and
December 31, 2009, compared with $2.0 billion at March 31, 2009. M&T Bank also serves as
remarketing agent for most of those bonds.
In the normal course of business, the Company enters into contractual obligations which
require future cash payments. Such obligations include, among others, payments related to
deposits, borrowings, leases, and other contractual commitments. Off-balance sheet commitments to
customers may impact liquidity, including commitments to extend credit, standby letters of credit,
commercial letters of credit, financial guarantees and indemnification contracts, and commitments
to sell real estate loans. Because many of these commitments or contracts expire without being
funded in whole or in part, the contract amounts are not necessarily indicative of future cash
flows. Further discussion of these commitments is provided in note 12 of Notes to Financial
Statements.
M&Ts primary source of funds to pay for operating expenses, shareholder dividends and
treasury stock repurchases has historically been the receipt of dividends from its banking
subsidiaries, which are subject to various regulatory limitations. Dividends from any banking
subsidiary to M&T are limited by the amount of earnings of the banking subsidiary in the current
year and the two preceding years. For purposes of the test, at March 31, 2010 approximately $1.2
billion was available for payment of dividends to M&T from banking subsidiaries. These historic
sources of cash flow have been augmented in the past by the issuance of trust preferred securities
and senior notes payable. Information regarding trust preferred securities and the related junior
subordinated debentures is included in note 4 of Notes to Financial Statements. M&T also maintains
a $30 million line of credit with an unaffiliated commercial bank, of which there were no
borrowings outstanding at March 31, 2010 or at December 31, 2009.
Management closely monitors the Companys liquidity position on an ongoing basis for
compliance with internal policies and believes that available sources of liquidity are adequate to
meet funding needs anticipated in the normal course of business. Management does not anticipate
engaging in any activities, either currently or in the long-term, for which adequate funding would
not be available and would therefore result in a significant strain on liquidity at either M&T or
its subsidiary banks.
Market risk is the risk of loss from adverse changes in the market prices and/or interest
rates of the Companys financial instruments. The primary market risk the Company is exposed to is
interest rate risk. Interest rate risk arises from the Companys core banking activities of
lending and deposit-taking, because assets and liabilities reprice at different times and by
different amounts as interest rates change. As a result, net interest income earned by the Company
is subject to the effects
- 51 -
of changing interest rates. The Company measures interest rate risk by
calculating the variability of net interest income in future periods under various interest
rate scenarios using projected balances for earning assets, interest-bearing liabilities and
derivatives used to hedge interest rate risk. Managements philosophy toward interest rate risk
management is to limit the variability of net interest income. The balances of financial
instruments used in the projections are based on expected growth from forecasted business
opportunities, anticipated prepayments of loans and investment securities, and expected maturities
of investment securities, loans and deposits. Management uses a value of equity model to
supplement the modeling technique described above. Those supplemental analyses are based on
discounted cash flows associated with on- and off-balance sheet financial instruments. Such
analyses are modeled to reflect changes in interest rates and provide management with a long-term
interest rate risk metric.
The Companys Risk Management Committee, which includes members of senior management, monitors
the sensitivity of the Companys net interest income to changes in interest rates with the aid of a
computer model that forecasts net interest income under different interest rate scenarios. In
modeling changing interest rates, the Company considers different yield curve shapes that consider
both parallel (that is, simultaneous changes in interest rates at each point on the yield curve)
and non-parallel (that is, allowing interest rates at points on the yield curve to vary by
different amounts) shifts in the yield curve. In utilizing the model, market implied forward
interest rates over the subsequent twelve months are generally used to determine a base interest
rate scenario for the net interest income simulation. That calculated base net interest income is
then compared to the income calculated under the varying interest rate scenarios. The model
considers the impact of ongoing lending and deposit-gathering activities, as well as
interrelationships in the magnitude and timing of the repricing of financial instruments, including
the effect of changing interest rates on expected prepayments and maturities. When deemed prudent,
management has taken actions to mitigate exposure to interest rate risk through the use of on- or
off-balance sheet financial instruments and intends to do so in the future. Possible actions
include, but are not limited to, changes in the pricing of loan and deposit products, modifying the
composition of earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, and adding to, modifying or
terminating existing interest rate swap agreements or other financial instruments used for interest
rate risk management purposes.
The accompanying table as of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 displays the estimated
impact on net interest income from non-trading financial instruments in the base scenario described
above resulting from parallel changes in interest rates across repricing categories during the
first modeling year.
SENSITIVITY OF NET INTEREST INCOME
TO CHANGES IN INTEREST RATES
Dollars in thousands
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calculated increase (decrease) |
|
|
in projected net interest income |
Changes
in interest rates |
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
December 31, 2009 |
+200 basis points |
|
$ |
38,268 |
|
|
|
33,974 |
|
+100 basis points |
|
|
21,234 |
|
|
|
19,989 |
|
-100 basis points |
|
|
(24,053 |
) |
|
|
(37,775 |
) |
-200 basis points |
|
|
(46,677 |
) |
|
|
(61,729 |
) |
The Company utilized many assumptions to calculate the impact that changes in interest rates
may have on net interest income. The more significant of those assumptions included the rate of
prepayments of mortgage-related assets, cash flows from derivative and other financial instruments
held for non-trading purposes, loan and deposit volumes and pricing, and deposit maturities. In
the scenarios presented, the Company also assumed gradual changes in rates during a twelve-month
period of 100 and 200 basis points, as compared with the assumed base scenario. In the event
- 52 -
that
a 100 or 200 basis point rate change cannot be achieved, the applicable
rate changes are limited to lesser amounts such that interest rates cannot be less than zero.
The assumptions used in interest rate sensitivity modeling are inherently uncertain and, as a
result, the Company cannot precisely predict the impact of changes in interest rates on net
interest income. Actual results may differ significantly from those presented due to the timing,
magnitude and frequency of changes in interest rates and changes in market conditions and interest
rate differentials (spreads) between maturity/repricing categories, as well as any actions, such as
those previously described, which management may take to counter such changes. In light of the
uncertainties and assumptions associated with the process, the amounts presented in the table are
not considered significant to the Companys past or projected net interest income.
Changes in fair value of the Companys financial instruments can also result from a lack of
trading activity for similar instruments in the financial markets. That impact is most notable on
the values assigned to the Companys investment securities. Information about the fair valuation
of such securities is presented herein under the heading Capital and in notes 3 and 11 of Notes
to Financial Statements.
The Company engages in trading activities to meet the financial needs of customers, to fund
the Companys obligations under certain deferred compensation plans and, to a limited extent, to
profit from perceived market opportunities. Financial instruments utilized in trading activities
consist predominantly of interest rate contracts, such as swap agreements, and forward and futures
contracts related to foreign currencies, but have also included forward and futures contracts
related to mortgage-backed securities and investments in U.S. Treasury and other government
securities, mortgage-backed securities and mutual funds and, as previously described, a limited
number of VRDBs. The Company generally mitigates the foreign currency and interest rate risk
associated with trading activities by entering into offsetting trading positions. The amounts of
gross and net trading positions, as well as the type of trading activities conducted by the
Company, are subject to a well-defined series of potential loss exposure limits established by
management and approved by M&Ts Board of Directors. However, as with any non-government
guaranteed financial instrument, the Company is exposed to credit risk associated with
counterparties to the Companys trading activities.
The notional amounts of interest rate contracts entered into for trading purposes
aggregated $12.8 billion at March 31, 2010, compared with $15.0 billion at March 31, 2009 and $13.9
billion at December 31, 2009. The notional amounts of foreign currency and other option and
futures contracts entered into for trading purposes totaled $701 million at March 31, 2010,
compared with $511 million and $608 million at March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2009, respectively.
Although the notional amounts of these trading contracts are not recorded in the consolidated
balance sheet, the fair values of all financial instruments used for trading activities are
recorded in the consolidated balance sheet. The fair values of all trading account assets and
liabilities were $403 million and $316 million, respectively, at March 31, 2010, $592 million and
$495 million, respectively, at March 31, 2009, and $387 million and $302 million, respectively, at
December 31, 2009. Included in trading account assets were assets related to deferred compensation
plans totaling $34 million and $29 million at March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively, and $36
million at December 31, 2009. Changes in the fair value of such assets are recorded as trading
account and foreign exchange gains in the consolidated statement of income. Included in other
liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet at March 31, 2010 and March 31, 2009 were $36
million and $34 million, respectively, of liabilities related to deferred compensation plans,
compared with $38 million at December 31,
2009. Changes in the balances of such liabilities due to the valuation of allocated
investment options to which the liabilities are indexed are recorded in other costs of operations
in the consolidated statement of income.
- 53 -
Given the Companys policies, limits and positions, management believes that the
potential loss exposure to the Company resulting from market risk associated with trading
activities was not material, however, as previously noted, the Company is exposed to credit risk
associated with counterparties to transactions associated with the Companys trading activities.
Additional information about the Companys use of derivative financial instruments in its trading
activities is included in note 9 of Notes to Financial Statements.
Provision for Credit Losses
The Company maintains an allowance for credit losses that in managements judgment is adequate
to absorb losses inherent in the loan and lease portfolio. A provision for credit losses is
recorded to adjust the level of the allowance as deemed necessary by management. The provision for
credit losses in the first quarter of 2010 was $105 million, compared with $158 million in the
year-earlier quarter and $145 million in the fourth quarter of 2009. The levels of the provision
over the last eight quarters have been higher than historical levels, reflecting a pronounced
downturn in the U.S. economy, which entered recession in late-2007, and significant deterioration
in the residential real estate market that began in early-2007 and continued through the recently
completed quarter. Declining real estate valuations and higher levels of delinquencies and
charge-offs have significantly affected the quality of the Companys residential real estate loan
portfolio. Specifically, the Companys Alt-A residential real estate loan portfolio and its
residential real estate builder and developer loan portfolio experienced the majority of the credit
problems related to the turmoil in the residential real estate market place. As a result of higher
unemployment levels and the recessionary economy, the Company also experienced increased levels of
consumer and commercial loan charge-offs over the past two years.
Loans acquired in connection with the Provident and Bradford transactions were recorded at fair
value with no carry over of any previously recorded allowance for credit losses. Determining
the fair value of the acquired loans required estimating cash flows expected to be collected
on the loans and discounting those cash flows at current interest rates. The excess of cash
flows expected at acquisition over the estimated fair value is recognized as interest income
over the remaining lives of the loans. The difference between contractually required payments
at acquisition and the cash flows expected to be collected at acquisition reflects estimated
future credit losses and other contractually required payments that the Company does not
expect to collect. Subsequent decreases to the expected cash flows will require the Company
to evaluate the need for an additional allowance for credit losses and could lead to
charge-offs of acquired loan balances. Subsequent increases in expected cash flows will
result in additional interest income to be recognized over the then-remaining lives of the
loans.
Net loan charge-offs were $95 million in the first quarter of 2010, compared with $100 million
and $135 million during the three-month periods ended March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2009,
respectively. Net charge-offs as an annualized percentage of average loans and leases were .74% in
the first quarter of 2010, compared with .83% and 1.03% in the first and fourth quarters of 2009,
respectively. A summary of net charge-offs by loan type follows:
- 54 -
NET CHARGE-OFFS
BY LOAN/LEASE TYPE
In thousands
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter |
|
|
First Quarter |
|
|
Fourth Quarter |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Commercial,
financial, etc. |
|
$ |
17,994 |
|
|
|
22,301 |
|
|
|
30,991 |
|
Real estate: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
30,226 |
|
|
|
22,399 |
|
|
|
50,605 |
|
Residential |
|
|
15,280 |
|
|
|
19,702 |
|
|
|
21,136 |
|
Consumer |
|
|
31,009 |
|
|
|
35,531 |
|
|
|
32,120 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
94,509 |
|
|
|
99,933 |
|
|
|
134,852 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in net charge-offs of commercial real estate loans were charge-offs of loans to
residential homebuilders and developers of $22 million in each of the quarters ended March 31, 2010
and March 31, 2009 and $40 million for the quarter ended December 31, 2009. Reflected in net
charge-offs of residential real estate loans were net charge-offs of Alt-A first mortgage loans of
$8 million in the initial 2010 quarter, compared with $13 million and $14 million in the first and
fourth quarters of 2009, respectively. Included in net charge-offs of consumer loans and leases
were net charge-offs during the quarters ended March 31, 2010, March 31, 2009 and December 31,
2009, respectively, of: indirect automobile loans of $10 million, $17 million and $13 million;
recreational vehicle loans of $7 million in each period; and home equity loans and lines of credit,
including Alt-A second lien loans, of $9 million, $9 million and $10 million. Including both first
and second lien mortgages, net charge-offs of Alt-A loans totaled $9 million and $16 million for
the quarters ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively, compared with $15 million in the final
quarter of 2009.
Nonaccrual loans totaled $1.34 billion or 2.60% of total loans and leases outstanding at March
31, 2010, compared with $1.00 billion or 2.05% a year earlier and $1.33 billion or 2.56% at
December 31, 2009. Major factors contributing to the rise in nonaccrual loans from March 31, 2009
were a $245 million rise in commercial real estate loans, including a $47 million increase in loans
to residential builders and developers, and an $89 million increase in commercial loans and leases.
The continuing turbulence in the residential real estate market place has resulted in deteriorated
real estate values and increased delinquencies, both for loans to consumers and loans to builders
and developers of residential real estate. The depressed state of the U.S. economy has resulted in
generally higher levels of nonaccrual loans. The slight increase in nonaccrual loans from December
31, 2009 to March 31, 2010 reflects a rise of $35 million in loans acquired in the Provident and
Bradford transactions and a $26 million decline in loans from the Companys legacy portfolio.
Accruing loans past due 90 days or more were $203 million or .40% of total loans and leases at
March 31, 2010, compared with $143 million or .29% at March 31, 2009 and $208 million or .40% at
December 31, 2009. Those loans included $195 million, $127 million and $193 million at March 31,
2010, March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2009, respectively, of loans guaranteed by government-related
entities. Such guaranteed loans included one-to-four family residential mortgage loans serviced by
the Company that were repurchased to reduce associated servicing costs, including a requirement to
advance principal and interest payments that had not been received from individual mortgagors.
Despite the loans being purchased by the Company, the insurance or guarantee by the applicable
government-related entity remains in force. The outstanding principal balances of the repurchased
loans are fully guaranteed by government-related entities and totaled $179 million and $122 million
as of March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively, and $176 million at
December 31, 2009. Loans past due 90 days or more and accruing interest that were guaranteed
by government-related entities also included foreign commercial and industrial loans supported by
the Export-Import Bank of the United States that totaled $11 million at March 31, 2010, $3 million
at March 31, 2009 and $13 million at December 31, 2009.
- 55 -
Loans obtained in the 2009 acquisition transactions that were impaired at the date of acquisition
were recorded at estimated fair value and are generally delinquent in payments, but, in
accordance with GAAP the Company continues to accrue interest income on such loans based on
the estimated expected cash flows associated with the loans. The carrying amount of such
loans was $74 million at March 31, 2010, or approximately .1% of total loans.
In an effort to assist borrowers, the Company has modified the terms of select loans secured by
residential real estate, largely from the Companys portfolio of Alt-A loans. Included in
loans outstanding at March 31, 2010 were $296 million of modified loans, of which $109 million
were classified as nonaccrual. The remaining modified loans have demonstrated payment
capability consistent with the modified terms and, accordingly, were classified as
renegotiated loans and were accruing interest at March 31, 2010. Loan modifications included
such actions as the extension of loan maturity dates (generally from thirty to forty years)
and the lowering of interest rates and monthly payments. The objective of the modifications
was to increase loan repayments by customers and thereby reduce net charge-offs. In accordance
with GAAP, the modified loans are included in impaired loans for purposes of determining the
allowance for credit losses. Modified residential real estate loans totaled $216 million at
March 31, 2009, of which $106 million were in nonaccrual status, and $292 million as of
December 31, 2009, of which $108 million were in nonaccrual status.
Commercial loans and leases classified as nonaccrual totaled $325 million at March 31, 2010,
$236 million at March 31, 2009 and $322 million at December 31, 2009. The rise in such loans at
the two most recent quarter-ends as compared with March 31, 2009 reflects the impact of general
economic conditions on borrowers abilities to repay loans. Additions to nonaccrual loans since
March 31, 2009 include a relationship to a single borrower that operates retirement communities
($41 million), a $37 million loan to a consumer finance and credit insurance company and a $19
million loan to a business in the health care sector.
Nonaccruing commercial real estate loans totaled $641 million at March 31, 2010, $396 million
at March 31, 2009 and $638 million at December 31, 2009. The rise in such loans at March 31, 2010
as compared with the end of the initial quarter of 2009 reflects the additions of a loan
collateralized by real estate in New York City ($104 million) and $47 million of loans to
residential homebuilders and developers. Information about the location of nonaccrual and
charged-off loans to residential real estate builders and developers as of and for the three-month
period ended March 31, 2010 is presented in the accompanying table.
- 56 -
RESIDENTIAL BUILDER AND DEVELOPER LOANS, NET OF UNEARNED DISCOUNT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter ended |
|
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonaccrual |
|
|
Net charge-offs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annualized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
percent of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
average |
|
|
|
Outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
outstanding |
|
|
|
balances |
|
|
Balances |
|
|
balances |
|
|
Balances |
|
|
balances |
|
|
|
( dollars in thousands ) |
|
New York |
|
$ |
370,706 |
|
|
$ |
34,547 |
|
|
|
9.32 |
% |
|
$ |
10,179 |
|
|
|
11.05 |
% |
Pennsylvania |
|
|
249,917 |
|
|
|
23,959 |
|
|
|
9.59 |
|
|
|
9,178 |
|
|
|
14.53 |
|
Mid-Atlantic |
|
|
788,197 |
|
|
|
203,980 |
|
|
|
25.88 |
|
|
|
1,562 |
|
|
|
0.77 |
|
Other |
|
|
237,432 |
|
|
|
55,031 |
|
|
|
23.18 |
|
|
|
1,195 |
|
|
|
2.04 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,646,252 |
|
|
$ |
317,517 |
|
|
|
19.29 |
% |
|
$ |
22,114 |
|
|
|
5.30 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential real estate loans classified as nonaccrual were $282 million at March 31, 2010,
compared with $298 million at March 31, 2009 and $281 million at December 31, 2009. Declining real
estate values and higher levels of delinquencies have contributed to the higher levels of
residential real estate loans classified as nonaccrual and to the level of charge-offs. Included
in residential real estate loans classified as nonaccrual were Alt-A loans of $114 million, $138
million and $112 million at March 31, 2010, March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2009, respectively.
Residential real estate loans past due 90 days or more and accruing interest totaled $181 million
at March 31, 2010, compared with $122 million a year earlier and $178 million at December 31, 2009.
A substantial portion of such amounts related to guaranteed loans repurchased from
government-related entities. Information about the location of nonaccrual and charged-off
residential real estate loans as of and for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 is presented in the
accompanying table.
- 57 -
SELECTED RESIDENTIAL REAL ESTATE-RELATED LOAN DATA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter ended |
|
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonaccrual |
|
|
Net charge-offs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annualized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
percent of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
average |
|
|
|
Outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
outstanding |
|
|
|
balances |
|
|
Balances |
|
|
balances |
|
|
Balances |
|
|
balances |
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
Residential mortgages: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New York |
|
$ |
2,054,216 |
|
|
$ |
42,333 |
|
|
|
2.06 |
% |
|
$ |
2,586 |
|
|
|
0.53 |
% |
Pennsylvania |
|
|
683,764 |
|
|
|
13,692 |
|
|
|
2.00 |
|
|
|
422 |
|
|
|
0.26 |
|
Mid-Atlantic |
|
|
1,067,305 |
|
|
|
43,327 |
|
|
|
4.06 |
|
|
|
1,799 |
|
|
|
0.69 |
|
Other |
|
|
1,065,319 |
|
|
|
55,444 |
|
|
|
5.20 |
|
|
|
1,962 |
|
|
|
0.71 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
4,870,604 |
|
|
$ |
154,796 |
|
|
|
3.18 |
% |
|
$ |
6,769 |
|
|
|
0.57 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential construction loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New York |
|
$ |
12,999 |
|
|
$ |
933 |
|
|
|
7.18 |
% |
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
|
0.07 |
% |
Pennsylvania |
|
|
5,544 |
|
|
|
828 |
|
|
|
14.94 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mid-Atlantic |
|
|
3,610 |
|
|
|
2,358 |
|
|
|
65.32 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
0.40 |
|
Other |
|
|
45,434 |
|
|
|
9,304 |
|
|
|
20.48 |
|
|
|
688 |
|
|
|
5.93 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
67,587 |
|
|
$ |
13,423 |
|
|
|
19.86 |
% |
|
$ |
695 |
|
|
|
3.97 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alt-A first mortgages: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New York |
|
$ |
104,409 |
|
|
$ |
17,162 |
|
|
|
16.44 |
% |
|
$ |
788 |
|
|
|
2.98 |
% |
Pennsylvania |
|
|
29,100 |
|
|
|
3,661 |
|
|
|
12.58 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
0.53 |
|
Mid-Atlantic |
|
|
132,323 |
|
|
|
16,143 |
|
|
|
12.20 |
|
|
|
1,077 |
|
|
|
3.25 |
|
Other |
|
|
460,137 |
|
|
|
76,573 |
|
|
|
16.64 |
|
|
|
5,912 |
|
|
|
5.09 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
725,969 |
|
|
$ |
113,539 |
|
|
|
15.64 |
% |
|
$ |
7,816 |
|
|
|
4.27 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alt-A junior lien: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New York |
|
$ |
3,282 |
|
|
$ |
137 |
|
|
|
4.17 |
% |
|
$ |
145 |
|
|
|
17.34 |
% |
Pennsylvania |
|
|
1,057 |
|
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
7.19 |
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
20.29 |
|
Mid-Atlantic |
|
|
5,263 |
|
|
|
599 |
|
|
|
11.38 |
|
|
|
201 |
|
|
|
15.27 |
|
Other |
|
|
18,847 |
|
|
|
1,232 |
|
|
|
6.54 |
|
|
|
1,005 |
|
|
|
20.95 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
28,449 |
|
|
$ |
2,044 |
|
|
|
7.18 |
% |
|
$ |
1,407 |
|
|
|
19.47 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First lien home equity loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New York |
|
$ |
42,610 |
|
|
$ |
105 |
|
|
|
0.25 |
% |
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
|
0.04 |
% |
Pennsylvania |
|
|
242,076 |
|
|
|
2,035 |
|
|
|
0.84 |
|
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
0.12 |
|
Mid-Atlantic |
|
|
178,692 |
|
|
|
1,698 |
|
|
|
0.95 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
0.07 |
|
Other |
|
|
2,583 |
|
|
|
276 |
|
|
|
10.69 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
465,961 |
|
|
$ |
4,114 |
|
|
|
0.88 |
% |
|
$ |
109 |
|
|
|
0.09 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First lien home equity lines: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New York |
|
$ |
712,681 |
|
|
$ |
1,951 |
|
|
|
0.27 |
% |
|
$ |
34 |
|
|
|
0.02 |
% |
Pennsylvania |
|
|
484,353 |
|
|
|
439 |
|
|
|
0.09 |
|
|
|
113 |
|
|
|
0.10 |
|
Mid-Atlantic |
|
|
498,298 |
|
|
|
286 |
|
|
|
0.06 |
|
|
|
169 |
|
|
|
0.14 |
|
Other |
|
|
12,136 |
|
|
|
430 |
|
|
|
3.54 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,707,468 |
|
|
$ |
3,106 |
|
|
|
0.18 |
% |
|
$ |
316 |
|
|
|
0.08 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Junior lien home equity loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New York |
|
$ |
109,678 |
|
|
$ |
1,513 |
|
|
|
1.38 |
% |
|
$ |
259 |
|
|
|
0.93 |
% |
Pennsylvania |
|
|
116,688 |
|
|
|
935 |
|
|
|
0.80 |
|
|
|
242 |
|
|
|
0.81 |
|
Mid-Atlantic |
|
|
189,066 |
|
|
|
2,268 |
|
|
|
1.20 |
|
|
|
538 |
|
|
|
1.12 |
|
Other |
|
|
10,380 |
|
|
|
272 |
|
|
|
2.62 |
|
|
|
391 |
|
|
|
14.81 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
425,812 |
|
|
$ |
4,988 |
|
|
|
1.17 |
% |
|
$ |
1,430 |
|
|
|
1.32 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Junior lien home equity lines: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New York |
|
$ |
1,850,569 |
|
|
$ |
12,096 |
|
|
|
0.65 |
% |
|
$ |
2,569 |
|
|
|
0.56 |
% |
Pennsylvania |
|
|
624,116 |
|
|
|
2,695 |
|
|
|
0.43 |
|
|
|
333 |
|
|
|
0.22 |
|
Mid-Atlantic |
|
|
1,582,966 |
|
|
|
6,535 |
|
|
|
0.41 |
|
|
|
2,450 |
|
|
|
0.63 |
|
Other |
|
|
79,417 |
|
|
|
1,564 |
|
|
|
1.97 |
|
|
|
545 |
|
|
|
2.74 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
4,137,068 |
|
|
$ |
22,890 |
|
|
|
0.55 |
% |
|
$ |
5,897 |
|
|
|
0.58 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonaccrual consumer loans and leases aggregated $92 million at March 31, 2010, compared
with $74 million at March 31, 2009 and $91 million at December 31, 2009. As a percentage of
consumer loan balances outstanding, nonaccrual consumer loans and leases were .78% at March 31,
2010, compared with .68% and
- 58 -
.75% at March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2009, respectively. Included
in nonaccrual consumer loans and leases at March 31, 2010, March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2009
were indirect automobile loans of $35 million, $26 million and $39 million, respectively;
recreational vehicle loans of $16 million, $14 million and $15 million, respectively; and outstanding balances of home equity lines of credit of
$26 million, $22 million and $23 million, respectively. Consumer loans delinquent 30-90 days at
March 31, 2010 totaled $108 million, compared with $96 million and $141 million at March 31, 2009
and December 31, 2009, respectively. Consumer loans past due 90 days or more and accruing interest
totaled $3 million, $2 million and $4 million at March 31, 2010, March 31, 2009 and December 31,
2009, respectively. Information about the location of nonaccrual and charged-off home equity loans
and lines of credit as of and for the quarter-ended March 31, 2010 is presented in the accompanying
table.
Real estate and other foreclosed assets were $95 million at each of March 31, 2010 and
December 31, 2009, and $100 million at March 31, 2009. At March 31, 2010, the Companys holding of
residential real estate-related properties comprised 84% of foreclosed assets.
A comparative summary of nonperforming assets and certain past due loan data and credit
quality ratios as of the end of the periods indicated is presented in the accompanying table.
NONPERFORMING ASSET AND PAST DUE, RENEGOTIATED AND IMPAIRED LOAN DATA
Dollars in thousands
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 Quarters |
|
|
|
First Quarter |
|
|
Fourth |
|
|
Third |
|
|
Second |
|
|
First |
|
Nonaccrual loans |
|
$ |
1,339,992 |
|
|
|
1,331,702 |
|
|
|
1,228,341 |
|
|
|
1,111,423 |
|
|
|
1,003,987 |
|
Real estate and other
foreclosed assets |
|
|
95,362 |
|
|
|
94,604 |
|
|
|
84,676 |
|
|
|
90,461 |
|
|
|
100,270 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total nonperforming assets |
|
$ |
1,435,354 |
|
|
|
1,426,306 |
|
|
|
1,313,017 |
|
|
|
1,201,884 |
|
|
|
1,104,257 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accruing loans past due
90 days or more(a) |
|
$ |
203,443 |
|
|
|
208,080 |
|
|
|
182,750 |
|
|
|
155,125 |
|
|
|
142,842 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Renegotiated loans |
|
$ |
220,885 |
|
|
|
212,548 |
|
|
|
190,917 |
|
|
|
170,950 |
|
|
|
130,932 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Government guaranteed loans
included in totals above: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonaccrual loans |
|
$ |
37,048 |
|
|
|
38,579 |
|
|
|
38,590 |
|
|
|
38,075 |
|
|
|
38,460 |
|
Accruing loans past
due 90 days or more |
|
|
194,523 |
|
|
|
193,495 |
|
|
|
172,701 |
|
|
|
143,886 |
|
|
|
127,237 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchased impaired loans(b): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding customer
balance |
|
$ |
148,686 |
|
|
|
172,772 |
|
|
|
209,138 |
|
|
|
170,400 |
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying amount |
|
|
73,890 |
|
|
|
88,170 |
|
|
|
108,058 |
|
|
|
97,730 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonaccrual loans
to total loans and leases,
net of unearned discount |
|
|
2.60 |
% |
|
|
2.56 |
% |
|
|
2.35 |
% |
|
|
2.11 |
% |
|
|
2.05 |
% |
Nonperforming assets
to total net loans and
leases and real estate
and other foreclosed assets |
|
|
2.78 |
% |
|
|
2.74 |
% |
|
|
2.51 |
% |
|
|
2.28 |
% |
|
|
2.25 |
% |
Accruing loans past due
90 days or more to total
loans and leases, net of
unearned discount |
|
|
.40 |
% |
|
|
.40 |
% |
|
|
.35 |
% |
|
|
.29 |
% |
|
|
.29 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Predominately residential mortgage loans. |
|
(b) |
|
Accruing loans that were impaired at acquisition date and recorded at fair
value. |
- 59 -
Management regularly assesses the adequacy of the allowance for credit losses by
performing ongoing evaluations of the loan and lease portfolio, including such factors as the
differing economic risks associated with each loan category, the financial condition of specific
borrowers, the economic environment in which borrowers operate, the level of delinquent loans, the
value of any collateral and, where applicable, the existence of any guarantees or indemnifications.
Management evaluated the impact of changes in interest rates and overall economic conditions on
the ability of borrowers to meet repayment obligations when quantifying the Companys exposure to
credit losses and assessing the adequacy of the Companys allowance for such losses as of each
reporting date. Factors also considered by management when performing its assessment, in addition
to general economic conditions and the other factors described above, included, but were not
limited to: (i) the impact of residential real estate values in the Companys portfolio of loans to
residential real estate builders and developers; (ii) the repayment performance associated with the
Companys portfolio of Alt-A and other residential mortgage loans; (iii) the concentration of
commercial real estate loans in the Companys loan portfolio, particularly the large concentration
of loans secured by properties in New York State, in general, and in the New York City metropolitan
area, in particular; (iv) the amount of commercial and industrial loans to businesses in areas of
New York State outside of the New York City metropolitan area and in central Pennsylvania that have
historically experienced less economic growth and vitality than the vast majority of other regions
of the country; and (v) the size of the Companys portfolio of loans to individual consumers, which
historically have experienced higher net charge-offs as a percentage of loans outstanding than
other loan types and for which repayment performance can be significantly affected by unemployment
levels. The level of the allowance is adjusted based on the results of managements analysis.
Management cautiously and conservatively evaluated the allowance for credit losses as of March
31, 2010 in light of (i) lower residential real estate values and higher levels of delinquencies of
residential real estate loans; (ii) the recession-like weak economic conditions in many of the
markets served by the Company; (iii) continuing weakness in industrial employment in upstate New
York and central Pennsylvania; (iv) the significant subjectivity involved in commercial real estate
valuations for properties located in areas with stagnant or low growth economies; and (v) the
amount of loan growth experienced by the Company. Considerable concerns exist about the economic
recovery in both national and international markets; the level and volatility of energy prices; a
weakened housing market; the troubled state of financial and credit markets; Federal Reserve
positioning of monetary policy; high levels of unemployment, which has caused consumer spending to
slow; the underlying impact on businesses operations and abilities to repay loans as consumer
spending slowed; continued stagnant population growth in the upstate New York and central
Pennsylvania regions; and continued uncertainty about possible responses to state and local
government budget deficits. Although the U.S. economy experienced recession and weak economic
conditions during recent years, as compared with other areas of the country, the impact of those
conditions was not as pronounced on borrowers in the traditionally slower growth or stagnant
regions of upstate New York and central Pennsylvania. Approximately one-half of the Companys
loans are to customers in New York State and Pennsylvania. Home prices in upstate New York and
central Pennsylvania were largely unchanged in 2009, in contrast to declines in values in other
regions of the country. Therefore, despite the conditions, as previously described, the most severe
credit issues experienced by the Company have been centered around residential real
estate, including loans to builders and developers of residential real estate, in areas other
than New York State and Pennsylvania. In response, the Company has conducted detailed reviews of
all loans to residential real estate builders and developers that exceeded $2.5 million. Those
credit reviews often resulted in commencement of intensified collection efforts, including
instances of foreclosure. During 2009, the Company experienced
- 60 -
increases in nonaccrual commercial
loans, largely the result of a small number of large relationships, and in nonaccrual commercial
real estate loans, largely due to builders and developers of residential real estate loans and one
large loan in New York City. The Company utilizes an extensive loan grading system which is
applied to all commercial and commercial real estate loans. On a quarterly basis, the Companys
loan review department reviews all commercial and commercial real estate loans greater than
$350,000 that are classified as Special Mention or worse. Meetings are held with loan officers and
their managers, workout specialists and Senior Management to discuss each of the relationships.
Borrower-specific information is reviewed, including operating results, future cash flows, recent
developments and the borrowers outlook, and other pertinent data. The timing and extent of
potential losses, considering collateral valuation and other factors, and the Companys potential
courses of action are reviewed. To the extent that these loans are collateral-dependent, they are
evaluated based on the fair value of the loans collateral as estimated at or near the financial
statement date. As the quality of a loan deteriorates to the point of classifying the loan as
Special Mention, the process of obtaining updated collateral valuation information is usually
initiated, unless it is not considered warranted given factors such as the relative size of the
loan, the characteristics of the collateral or the age of the last valuation. In those latter
cases, when current appraisals may not yet be available, prior appraisals are utilized with
adjustments, as deemed necessary, for estimates of subsequent declines in value as determined by
line of business and/or loan workout personnel in the respective geographic regions. Those
adjustments are reviewed and assessed for reasonableness by the Companys loan review department.
Accordingly, for real estate collateral securing larger commercial and commercial real estate
loans, estimated collateral values are based on current appraisals and estimates of value. For
non-real estate loans, collateral is assigned a discounted estimated liquidation value and,
depending on the nature of the collateral, is verified through field exams or other procedures. In
assessing collateral, real estate and non-real estate values are reduced by an estimate of selling
costs. With regard to residential real estate loans, with special emphasis on the portfolio of
Alt-A mortgage loans, the Company expanded its collections and loan work-out staff and further
refined its loss identification and estimation techniques by reference to loan performance and
house price depreciation data in specific areas of the country where collateral that was securing
the Companys residential real estate loans was located. For residential real estate loans,
including home equity loans and lines of credit, the excess of the loan balance over the net
realizable value of the property collateralizing the loan is charged-off when the loan becomes 150
days delinquent. That charge-off is based on recent indications of value from external parties.
Factors that influence the Companys credit loss experience include overall economic
conditions affecting businesses and consumers generally, but also residential and commercial real
estate valuations, in particular, given the size of the real estate loan portfolios. Reflecting
the factors and conditions as described herein, the Company has experienced increases in nonaccrual
loans and net charge-offs of real estate-related loans, particularly in the Companys portfolios of
residential real estate loans, including first and second lien Alt-A mortgage loans, and loans to
builders and developers of residential real estate. The Company has also experienced increases in
nonaccrual commercial real estate loans. Commercial real estate valuations can be highly
subjective, as they are based upon many assumptions. Such valuations can be significantly affected
over relatively short periods of time by changes in business climate, economic conditions, interest rates and, in many
cases, the results of operations of businesses and other occupants of the real property.
Similarly, residential real estate valuations can be impacted by housing trends, the availability
of financing at reasonable interest rates, and general economic conditions affecting consumers.
- 61 -
Management believes that the allowance for credit losses at March 31, 2010 was adequate to
absorb credit losses inherent in the portfolio as of that date. The allowance for credit losses was
$891 million, or 1.73% of total loans and leases at March 31, 2010, compared with $846 million or
1.73% at the end of the first quarter of 2009 and $878 million or 1.69% at December 31, 2009. The
ratio of the allowance to total loans at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 reflects the impact
of $3.9 billion of loans obtained in the acquisition of Provident and in the Bradford transaction
that have been recorded at estimated fair value based on estimated future cash flows expected to be
received on those loans. Those cash flows reflect the impact of expected defaults on customer
repayment performance. As a result, and as required by GAAP, there was no carry over of the
allowance for credit losses previously recorded by Provident and Bradford. Accordingly, although
general in nature the allowance for credit losses is predominantly intended to provide for losses
inherent in the Companys legacy loans (that is, total loans excluding loans acquired during 2009
in the Provident and Bradford transactions). The allowance for credit losses as a percentage of
such legacy loans was 1.86% at March 31, 2010, compared with 1.83% at December 31, 2009 and 1.73%
at March 31, 2009. The level of the allowance reflects managements evaluation of the loan and
lease portfolio as described herein. Should the various credit factors considered by management in
establishing the allowance for credit losses change and should managements assessment of losses
inherent in the loan portfolio also change, the level of the allowance as a percentage of loans
could increase or decrease in future periods. The ratio of the allowance for credit losses to
nonaccrual loans was 67% at March 31, 2010, compared with 84% a year earlier and 66% at December
31, 2009. Given the Companys general position as a secured lender and its practice of charging
off loan balances when collection is deemed doubtful, that ratio and changes in that ratio are
generally not an indicative measure of the adequacy of the Companys allowance for credit losses,
nor does management rely upon that ratio in assessing the adequacy of the allowance. The level of
the allowance reflects managements evaluation of the loan and lease portfolio as of each
respective date.
Other Income
Other income totaled $258 million in the first quarter of 2010, compared with $232 million in
the similar 2009 quarter and $266 million in the fourth quarter of 2009. Reflected in those
amounts were net losses on investment securities (including other-than-temporary impairment
losses), which totaled $26 million in the recent quarter, $32 million in the first quarter of 2009,
and $34 million in the final 2009 quarter. Included in those securities losses were
other-than-temporary impairment charges of $27 million in the recent quarter, $32 million in the
year earlier quarter and $34 million in the final quarter of 2009. Those other-than-temporary
impairment charges were predominantly related to the Companys holdings of privately issued CMOs
and reflect the impact of lower real estate values and higher delinquencies on residential real
estate loans underlying those impaired securities. Excluding gains and losses from bank investment
securities (including other-than-temporary impairment losses), other income aggregated $284
million, $264 million and $300 million in the three-month periods ended March 31, 2010, March 31,
2009 and December 31, 2009, respectively. Contributing to the improvement of such income in the
recent quarter as compared with the year-earlier period were service charges on acquisition-related
deposit accounts and increases in credit-related fees and insurance-related income. Partially
offsetting those improvements were lower residential mortgage banking revenues and trust income.
Decreases in residential mortgage banking revenues and service charges on deposit
accounts contributed to the recent quarters decline as compared with the fourth quarter of 2009,
offset, in part, by lower losses from M&Ts pro-rata share of the operating results of Bayview
Lending Group LLC (BLG).
- 62 -
Mortgage banking revenues totaled $41 million in the recently completed quarter, down
from $56 million in the year-earlier quarter and $50 million in the fourth quarter of 2009.
Mortgage banking revenues are comprised of both residential and commercial mortgage banking
activities. The Companys involvement in commercial mortgage banking activities includes the
origination, sales and servicing of loans under the multifamily loan programs of Fannie Mae,
Freddie Mac and the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.
Residential mortgage banking revenues, consisting of realized gains from sales of
residential mortgage loans and loan servicing rights, unrealized gains and losses on residential
mortgage loans held for sale and related commitments, residential mortgage loan servicing fees, and
other residential mortgage loan-related fees and income, were $29 million in the first quarter of
2010, compared with $48 million in the 2009 initial quarter and $37 million in the final quarter of
2009. The decline in residential mortgage banking revenues in the recent quarter as compared with
the first and fourth quarters of 2009 was largely attributable to lower origination activity, due
predominantly to higher mortgage loan interest rates.
New commitments to originate residential mortgage loans to be sold were approximately $1.0
billion in the recent quarter, down from $2.2 billion in the first quarter of 2009 and $1.2 billion
in 2009s fourth quarter. Similarly, closed residential mortgage loans originated for sale to
other investors were approximately $1.0 billion in the recent quarter, compared with $1.7 billion
and $1.2 billion during the three-month periods ended March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2009,
respectively. Residential mortgage loans sold to investors totaled $1.1 billion in the recently
completed quarter, compared with $1.3 billion and $1.2 billion in the first and fourth quarters of
2009, respectively. Realized gains from sales of residential mortgage loans and loan servicing
rights and recognized net unrealized gains and losses attributable to residential mortgage loans
held for sale, commitments to originate loans for sale and commitments to sell loans totaled to a
gain of $8 million in the first quarter of 2010, compared with gains of $27 million in the first
quarter of 2009 and $16 million in the fourth quarter of 2009.
The Company is contractually obligated to repurchase previously sold loans that do not
ultimately meet investor sale criteria related to underwriting procedures or loan documentation.
When required to do so, the Company may reimburse loan purchasers for losses incurred or may
repurchase certain loans. Since early 2007 when the Company recognized a $6 million charge related
to declines in market values of previously sold residential real estate loans that the Company
could have been required to repurchase, the Company has regularly reduced residential mortgage
banking revenues by an estimate for losses related to its obligations to loan purchasers. The
amount of those charges varies based on the volume of loans sold, the level of reimbursement
requests received from loan purchasers and estimates of losses that may be associated with
previously sold loans. That variability has not had a material impact on the Companys results of
operations and management believes that any liability arising out of the Companys obligation to
loan purchasers as of March 31, 2010 is not material to the Companys consolidated financial
position. Nevertheless, in recent quarters the Company has received increased requests from loan
purchasers for reimbursement. The Company has considered those requests in assessing the estimated
impact on the Companys consolidated financial statements.
Revenues from servicing residential mortgage loans for others were $20 million during each of
the quarters ended March 31, 2010 and March 31, 2009, compared with $21 million in the fourth
quarter of 2009. Included in servicing revenues were amounts related to purchased servicing rights
associated with small balance commercial mortgage loans which totaled $7 million in each of the
first quarters of 2010 and 2009, and in the final 2009 quarter.
- 63 -
Residential mortgage loans serviced for others totaled $21.7 billion at March 31, 2010, $21.4
billion at December 31, 2009 and $21.0 billion at March 31, 2009, including the small balance
commercial mortgage loans noted above of approximately $5.8 billion at March 31, 2010, $5.5 billion
at December 31, 2009 and $5.9 billion at March 31, 2009. Capitalized residential mortgage
servicing assets, net of a valuation allowance for impairment, were $133 million at March 31, 2010,
compared with $139 million at March 31, 2009 and $141 million at December 31, 2009. The valuation
allowance for possible impairment of capitalized residential mortgage servicing assets totaled $50
thousand at December 31, 2009 and $17 million at March 31, 2009. There was no such allowance at
March 31, 2010. Included in capitalized residential mortgage servicing assets were $36 million at
March 31, 2010, $53 million at March 31, 2009 and $40 million at December 31, 2009 of purchased
servicing rights associated with the small balance commercial mortgage loans noted above.
Servicing rights for the small balance commercial mortgage loans were purchased from BLG or its
affiliates. In addition, at March 31, 2010, capitalized servicing rights included $15 million for
servicing rights for $4.0 billion of residential real estate loans that were purchased from
affiliates of BLG. Additional information about the Companys relationship with BLG and its
affiliates is provided in note 14 of Notes to Financial Statements.
Loans held for sale that are secured by residential real estate aggregated $353 million and
$763 million at March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively, and $530 million at December 31, 2009.
Commitments to sell loans and commitments to originate loans for sale at pre-determined rates were
$785 million and $640 million, respectively, at March 31, 2010, compared with $1.5 billion each at
March 31, 2009, and $936 million and $631 million, respectively, at December 31, 2009. Net
unrealized gains on residential mortgage loans held for sale, commitments to sell loans, and
commitments to originate loans for sale were $14 million and $21 million at March 31, 2010 and
March 31, 2009, respectively, and were $15 million at December 31, 2009. Changes in such net
unrealized gains and losses are recorded in mortgage banking revenues and resulted in a net
decrease in revenue of $1 million in the first quarter of 2010, compared with net increases in
revenue of $15 million in the first quarter of 2009 and $2 million in 2009s final quarter.
Commercial mortgage banking revenues totaled $12 million in the recent quarter, $8 million in
the first quarter of 2009 and $13 million in the fourth quarter of 2009. Included in such amounts
were revenues from loan origination and sales activities of $8 million and $5 million in the
quarters ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively, and $9 million in the final 2009 quarter.
Commercial mortgage loan servicing revenues were $4 million in each of the quarters ended March 31,
2010 and December 31, 2009, and $3 million in the initial quarter of 2009. Capitalized commercial
mortgage servicing assets totaled $37 million at March 31, 2010, compared with $27 million and $33
million at March 31 and December 31, 2009, respectively. Commercial mortgage loans serviced for
other investors totaled $7.5 billion, $6.7 billion and $7.1 billion at March 31, 2010, March 31,
2009 and December 31, 2009, respectively, and included $1.4 billion, $1.2 billion and $1.3 billion,
respectively, of loan balances for which investors had recourse to the Company if such balances are
ultimately uncollectible. Commitments to sell commercial mortgage loans and commitments to
originate commercial mortgage loans for sale were $131 million and $61 million, respectively, at
March 31, 2010, $179 million and $138 million, respectively, at March 31, 2009 and $303 million and
$180 million, respectively, at December 31, 2009. Commercial mortgage loans held for sale at March 31, 2010 and 2009 were
$70 million and $40 million, respectively, and were $123 million at December 31, 2009.
Service charges on deposit accounts aggregated $120 million in the first quarter of 2010,
compared with $101 million in the year-earlier quarter and $127 million in the final 2009 quarter.
The rise in such fees in the recent quarter as compared with the year-earlier quarter was due
predominantly to the impact of
- 64 -
the acquisition of Provident. Contributing to the lower recent
quarter revenues as compared with 2009s fourth quarter were traditional first quarter seasonal
declines in customer transaction volumes. The Federal Reserve and other bank regulators have
adopted regulations requiring expanded disclosure of overdraft and other fees assessed to consumers
and have issued guidance that will allow consumers to elect to not be subject to fees for certain
deposit account transactions beginning July 1, 2010. The Company intends to comply with these
regulations but, at the present time, cannot predict the extent to which customers will elect to
not avail themselves of the respective deposit account services. Trust income aggregated $31
million in the initial 2010 quarter, compared with $35 million and $30 million in the first and
fourth quarters of 2009, respectively. The declines in trust income in the two most recent
quarters as compared with last years initial quarter are largely attributable to the impact of
lower balances in proprietary mutual funds and fee waivers by the Company in order to continue to
pay customers a yield on their investments in proprietary money-market mutual funds. Those waived
fees totaled approximately $5 million during each of the three-month periods ended March 31, 2010
and December 31, 2009, and $600 thousand during the three-month period ended March 31, 2009.
Brokerage services income, which includes revenues from the sale of mutual funds and annuities and
securities brokerage fees, totaled $13 million and $15 million in the first quarters of 2010 and
2009, respectively, and $14 million in the fourth quarter of 2009. Trading account and foreign
exchange activity resulted in gains of $5 million during the quarter ended March 31, 2010, $1
million in the first quarter of 2009 and $7 million in 2009s fourth quarter. Contributing to the
higher level of revenues in the two most recent quarters as compared with the initial quarter of
2009 were net increases in the market values of trading account assets held in connection with
deferred compensation plans.
Including other-than-temporary impairment losses, during the first quarter of 2010 the Company
recognized losses on investment securities of $26 million, compared with losses of $32 million in
the year-earlier quarter and $34 million in the fourth quarter of 2009. Other-than-temporary
impairment charges of $27 million, $32 million and $34 million were recorded in the quarters ended
March 31, 2010, March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2009, respectively. Each reporting period, the
Company reviews its investment securities for other-than-temporary impairment. For equity
securities, such as the Companys investment in the preferred stock of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac,
the Company considers various factors to determine if the decline in value is other than temporary,
including the duration and extent of the decline in value, the factors contributing to the decline
in fair value, including the financial condition of the issuer as well as the conditions of the
industry in which it operates, and the prospects for a recovery in fair value of the equity
security. For debt securities, the Company analyzes the creditworthiness of the issuer or reviews
the credit performance of the underlying collateral supporting the bond. For debt securities backed
by pools of loans, such as privately issued mortgage-backed securities, the Company estimates the
cash flows of the underlying loan collateral using forward-looking assumptions of default rates,
loss severities and prepayment speeds. Estimated collateral cash flows are then utilized to
estimate bond-specific cash flows to determine the ultimate collectibility of the bond. If the
present value of the cash flows indicates that the Company should not expect to recover the entire
amortized cost basis of a bond or if the Company intends to sell the bond or it more likely than
not will be required to sell the bond before recovery of its amortized cost basis, an
other-than-temporary impairment loss is recognized. If an other-than-temporary impairment loss is deemed to have
occurred, the investment securitys cost basis is adjusted, as appropriate for the circumstances.
Additional information about other-than-temporary impairment losses is included herein under the
heading Capital.
M&Ts share of the operating results of BLG in the recent quarter was a loss of $6 million,
compared with losses of $4 million in the first quarter of 2009 and $11 million in the final 2009
quarter. The operating losses of
- 65 -
BLG in the respective quarters resulted from the disruptions in
the commercial mortgage-backed securities market and reflected losses from loan sales activities,
lower values ascribed to loans held for sale, higher provisions for losses associated with
securitized loans and other loans held by BLG, and costs associated with severance and certain
lease terminations incurred by BLG as it downsized its operations. Despite the credit and liquidity
disruptions that began in 2007, BLG had been successfully securitizing and selling significant
volumes of small-balance commercial real estate loans until the first quarter of 2008. In response
to the illiquidity in the marketplace since that time, BLG reduced its originations activities,
scaled back its workforce and made use of its contingent liquidity sources. In addition to BLGs
mortgage origination and sales capabilities, BLG also is entitled to cash flows from mortgage
assets that it owns or that are owned by its affiliates and from asset management and other
services provided by its affiliates. Accordingly, the Company believes that BLG is capable of
realizing positive cash flows that could be available for distribution to its owners, including
M&T, despite a lack of positive GAAP-earnings. Nevertheless, if BLG is not able to realize
sufficient cash flows for the benefit of M&T, the Company may be required to recognize an
other-than-temporary impairment charge in a future period for some portion of the $240 million book
value of its investment in BLG. Information about the Companys relationship with BLG and its
affiliates is included in note 14 of Notes to Financial Statements.
Other revenues from operations totaled $79 million in the first quarter of 2010, compared with
$59 million in the similar 2009 period and $82 million in the fourth quarter of 2009. Included in
other revenues from operations were the following significant components. Letter of credit and
other credit-related fees totaled $29 million in the recent quarter, $21 million in the first
quarter of 2009 and $26 million in 2009s final quarter. The higher fees in the two most recent
quarters as compared with the initial quarter of 2009 were largely attributable to increased loan
syndication fees. Tax-exempt income from bank owned life insurance, which includes increases in
the cash surrender value of life insurance policies and benefits received, totaled $12 million
during the first quarter of 2010, compared with $10 million and $13 million in the first and fourth
quarters of 2009, respectively. Revenues from merchant discount and credit card fees were $11
million in each of the quarters ended March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 and $10 million in the
quarter ended March 31, 2009. Insurance-related sales commissions and other revenues totaled $11
million, $6 million and $12 million in the first quarters of 2010 and 2009 and the fourth quarter
of 2009, respectively. No other revenue source contributed more than $5 million to other revenues
from operations in any of the quarterly periods discussed herein.
Other Expense
Other expense totaled $489 million in the first quarter of 2010, 12% higher than $438 million
in the corresponding quarter of 2009 and 2% above $478 million in the final 2009 quarter. Included
in the amounts noted above are expenses considered by management to be nonoperating in nature
consisting of amortization of core deposit and other intangible assets of $16 million and $15
million in the first quarters of 2010 and 2009, respectively, and $17 million in the fourth quarter
of 2009, and merger-related expenses of $2 million and $6 million in the three-month periods ended March 31,
2009 and December 31, 2009, respectively. There were no merger-related expenses in the first
quarter of 2010. Exclusive of these nonoperating expenses, noninterest operating expenses totaled
$473 million in the first three months of 2010, compared with $421 million and $455 million in the
first and fourth quarters of 2009, respectively. The higher level of such expenses in the recent
quarter as compared with the year-earlier quarter was due largely to the operations obtained in the
2009 acquisitions and higher FDIC assessments. The rise in expenses from the fourth quarter of
2009 was largely the result of
- 66 -
seasonally higher incentive compensation and related payroll tax and
benefits costs. Table 2 provides a reconciliation of other expense to noninterest operating
expense.
Salaries and employee benefits expense aggregated $264 million in the recently completed
quarter, compared with $249 million in the first quarter of 2009 and $247 million in 2009s fourth
quarter. The rise in such expense in the first quarter of 2010 as compared with the year-earlier
quarter reflects the impact of the operations obtained in the 2009 acquisition transactions.
Contributing to the increase in salaries and employee benefits expense in the recent quarter as
compared with the fourth quarter of 2009 were higher stock-based compensation and payroll-related
taxes and the Companys contributions for retirement savings plan benefits related to annual
incentive compensation payments. The Company, in accordance with GAAP, has accelerated the
recognition of compensation costs for stock-based awards granted to retirement-eligible employees
and employees who will become retirement-eligible prior to full vesting of the award. As a result,
stock-based compensation expense during the first quarters of 2010 and 2009 included $7 million and
$9 million, respectively, that would have been recognized over the normal four-year vesting period
if not for the accelerated expense recognition provisions of GAAP. That acceleration had no effect
on the value of stock-based compensation awarded to employees. Salaries and benefits expense
included stock-based compensation of $20 million, $22 million and $11 million in the quarters ended
March 31, 2010, March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2009, respectively. The number of full-time
equivalent employees was 13,226 at March 31, 2010, compared with 12,944 and 13,639 at March 31,
2009 and December 31, 2009, respectively.
Excluding the nonoperating expenses described earlier from each quarter, nonpersonnel
operating expenses were $209 million in each of the quarters ended March 31, 2010 and December 31,
2009 and $171 million in the initial quarter of 2009. The rise in such expenses in the recent
quarter as compared with the year-earlier quarter was due largely to higher FDIC assessments and
costs associated with the acquired operations of Provident.
The efficiency ratio, or noninterest operating expenses (as defined above) divided by the
sum of taxable-equivalent net interest income and noninterest income (exclusive of gains and losses
from bank investment securities and gains on merger-related transactions), measures the
relationship of noninterest operating expenses to revenues. The Companys efficiency ratio was
55.9% in the first quarter of 2010, compared with 58.7% in the year-earlier period and 52.7% in the
fourth quarter of 2009. Noninterest operating expenses used in calculating the efficiency ratio do
not include the amortization of core deposit and other intangible assets, as noted earlier. If
charges for amortization of core deposit and other intangible assets were included, the efficiency
ratio for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2010, March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2009 would
have been 57.8%, 60.8% and 54.6%, respectively.
Income Taxes
The provision for income taxes for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 was $69 million, compared
with $20 million and $64 million in the first and fourth quarters of 2009, respectively. The
effective tax rates were 31.3%, 23.4% and 32.0% for the quarters ended March 31, 2010, March 31,
2009 and December 31, 2009, respectively. The effective tax rate is affected by the level of
income earned that is exempt from tax relative to the overall level of pre-tax income, the level of
income allocated to the various state and local jurisdictions where the Company operates, because
tax rates differ among such jurisdictions, and the impact of any large but infrequently occurring
items.
- 67 -
The Companys effective tax rate in future periods will be affected by the results of
operations allocated to the various tax jurisdictions within which the Company operates, any change
in income tax laws or regulations within those jurisdictions, and interpretations of income tax
regulations that differ from the Companys interpretations by any of various tax authorities that
may examine tax returns filed by M&T or any of its subsidiaries.
Capital
Stockholders equity was $7.9 billion at March 31, 2010, representing 11.57% of total assets,
compared with $6.9 billion or 10.64% at March 31, 2009 and $7.8 billion or 11.26% at December 31,
2009. Included in stockholders equity at those dates was $600 million of Fixed Rate Cumulative
Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series A, and warrants to purchase M&T common stock issued on December
23, 2008 as part of the U.S. Treasury Capital Purchase Program (CPP). The financial statement
value of that preferred stock was $574 million at March 31, 2010 and $573 million at December 31,
2009. Provident also participated in the CPP on November 14, 2008. As a result, Providents
$151.5 million of preferred stock related thereto was converted to M&T Fixed Rate Cumulative
Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series C, with warrants to purchase
M&T common stock. The holder of the
Series A and Series C preferred stock is entitled to cumulative cash dividends of 5% per annum for
five years after the date of initial issuance and 9% per annum thereafter, payable quarterly in
arrears. That preferred stock is redeemable at the option of M&T, subject to regulatory approval.
M&T also obtained another series of preferred stock as part of the Provident acquisition that was
converted to $26.5 million of M&T Series B Mandatory Convertible Non-Cumulative Preferred Stock,
liquidation preference of $1,000 per share. The 26,500 shares of the Series B Preferred Stock will
automatically convert into 433,148 shares of M&T common stock on April 1, 2011. The Series B
Preferred Stock pays dividends at a rate of 10% per annum on the liquidation preference of $1,000
per share, payable quarterly in arrears. The estimated fair value ascribed to the Series C
Preferred Stock associated with the acquisition of Provident was $129 million on the May 23, 2009
acquisition date. The financial statement value of the Series C Preferred Stock was $132 million
and $131 million at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively. The estimated acquisition
date fair value of the Series B Preferred Stock was approximately equal to that stocks $26.5
million redemption value.
Common stockholders equity was $7.2 billion, or $60.40 per share, at March 31, 2010, compared
with $6.3 billion, or $56.95 per share, at March 31, 2009 and $7.0 billion, or $59.31 per
share, at December 31, 2009. Tangible equity per common share, which excludes goodwill and
core deposit and other intangible assets and applicable deferred tax balances, was $29.59 at March
31, 2010, $26.90 at March 31, 2009 and $28.27 at December 31, 2009. The Companys ratio of
tangible common equity to tangible assets was 5.43% at March 31, 2010, compared with 4.86% a year
earlier and 5.13% at December 31, 2009. Reconciliations of total common stockholders equity and
tangible common equity and total assets and tangible assets as of each of those respective dates
are presented in table 2.
Stockholders equity reflects accumulated other comprehensive income or loss, which
includes the net after-tax impact of unrealized gains or losses on investment securities classified
as available-for-sale, gains or losses associated with interest rate swap agreements designated as
cash flow hedges, and adjustments to reflect the funded status of defined benefit pension and other
postretirement plans. Net unrealized losses on available-for-sale investment securities, net of
applicable tax effect, were $140 million, or $1.18 per common share, at March 31, 2010, compared
with similar losses of $446 million, or $4.01 per common share, at March 31, 2009 and $220 million,
or $1.86 per common share, at December 31, 2009. Such unrealized losses represent the
- 68 -
difference,
net of applicable income tax effect, between the estimated fair value and amortized cost of
investment securities classified as available for sale, including the remaining unamortized
unrealized losses on investment securities that have been transferred to held-to-maturity
classification.
Reflected in net unrealized losses at March 31, 2010 were pre tax-effect unrealized losses of $385
million on available-for-sale investment securities with an amortized cost of $2.4 billion and
pre tax-effect unrealized gains of $221 million on securities with an amortized cost of $3.9
billion. The pre tax-effect unrealized losses reflect $305 million of losses considered Level
3 valuations on privately issued residential mortgage-backed securities having an amortized
cost of $1.7 billion and an estimated fair value of $1.4 billion and $48 million of losses
generally considered Level 2 valuations on trust preferred securities issued by financial
institutions having an amortized cost of $147 million and an estimated fair value of $99
million.
The Companys privately issued residential mortgage-backed securities classified as available
for sale are generally collateralized by prime and Alt-A residential mortgage loans as depicted in
the accompanying table. Information in the table is as of March 31, 2010. As with any accounting
estimate or other data, changes in fair values and investment ratings may occur at any time.
PRIVATELY ISSUED MORTGAGE-BACKED SECURITIES CLASSIFIED AS AVAILABLE FOR SALE (a)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a percentage of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
carrying value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collateral type |
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
unrealized |
|
|
AAA |
|
|
Investment |
|
|
Senior |
|
|
|
cost |
|
|
value |
|
|
gains(losses) |
|
|
rated |
|
|
grade |
|
|
tranche |
|
Residential
mortgage loans |
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
Prime Fixed |
|
$ |
128,503 |
|
|
|
132,252 |
|
|
|
3,749 |
|
|
|
64 |
% |
|
|
68 |
% |
|
|
95 |
% |
Prime Hybrid ARMs |
|
|
1,614,662 |
|
|
|
1,390,131 |
|
|
|
(224,531 |
) |
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
91 |
|
Prime Other |
|
|
1,949 |
|
|
|
1,598 |
|
|
|
(351 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 |
|
Alt-A Fixed |
|
|
9,472 |
|
|
|
10,734 |
|
|
|
1,262 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
92 |
|
Alt-A Hybrid ARMs |
|
|
198,380 |
|
|
|
126,275 |
|
|
|
(72,105 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
78 |
|
Alt-A Option ARMs |
|
|
408 |
|
|
|
269 |
|
|
|
(139 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
5,261 |
|
|
|
3,082 |
|
|
|
(2,179 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal |
|
|
1,958,635 |
|
|
|
1,664,341 |
|
|
|
(294,294 |
) |
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial mortgage loans |
|
|
31,356 |
|
|
|
25,125 |
|
|
|
(6,231 |
) |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,989,991 |
|
|
|
1,689,466 |
|
|
|
(300,525 |
) |
|
|
18 |
% |
|
|
63 |
% |
|
|
90 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
All information is as of March 31, 2010. |
Reflecting the credit stress associated with residential mortgage loans, trading activity
for privately issued residential mortgage-backed securities has been dramatically reduced. In
estimating values for such securities, the Company was significantly restricted in the level of
market observable assumptions used in the valuation of its privately issued mortgage-backed
securities portfolio. Because of the inactivity and the lack of observable valuation inputs, the
Company classifies its privately issued mortgage-backed securities portfolio as Level 3. To assist
in the determination of fair value for its privately issued mortgage-backed securities, the Company
engaged two independent pricing sources at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009. In April 2009,
new accounting guidance was provided for estimating fair value when the volume and level of trading
activity for an asset or liability have significantly decreased. In consideration of that
guidance, the Company performed internal modeling to estimate the cash flows and fair value of 145
of its privately issued residential mortgage-backed securities with an amortized
- 69 -
cost basis of $1.8
billion at March 31, 2010. The Companys internal modeling techniques included discounting
estimated bond-specific cash flows using assumptions about cash flows associated with loans
underlying each of the bonds. In estimating those cash flows, the Company used conservative
assumptions as to future delinquency, default and loss rates in order to mitigate exposure that
might be attributable to the risk that actual future credit losses could exceed assumed credit
losses. Differences between internal model valuations and external pricing indications were
generally considered to be reflective of the lack of liquidity in the market for privately issued
mortgage-backed securities. To determine the most representative fair value for each of the 145
bonds under current market conditions, the Company computed values based on judgmentally applied
weightings of the internal model valuations and the indications obtained from the average of the
two independent pricing sources. Weightings applied to internal model valuations were generally
dependent on bond structure and collateral type, with prices for bonds in non-senior tranches
generally receiving lower weightings on the internal model results and greater weightings of the
valuation data provided by the independent pricing sources. As a result, certain valuations of
privately issued residential mortgage-backed securities were determined by reference to independent
pricing sources without adjustment. The average weight placed on internal model valuations was
37%, compared with a 63% weighting on valuations provided by the independent sources. Generally,
the range of weights placed on internal valuations were between 0% and 40%. Further information
concerning the Companys valuations of privately issued mortgage-backed securities can be found in
note 11 of Notes to Financial Statements.
During the quarter ended March 31, 2010, the Company recognized $27 million (pre-tax) of
other-than-temporary impairment losses predominantly related to privately issued residential
mortgage-backed securities with an amortized cost basis (before impairment charge) of $423 million.
Those other-than-temporary impairment losses were determined in accordance with GAAP and,
therefore, reflect the estimated credit losses on the impaired securities. In assessing impairment
losses, the Company performed internal modeling to estimate bond-specific cash flows, which
considered the placement of the bond in the overall securitization structure and the remaining
levels of subordination. For privately issued residential mortgage-backed securities, the model
utilized assumptions about the underlying performance of the mortgage loan collateral considering
recent collateral performance and future assumptions regarding default and loss severity. At March
31, 2010, projected model default percentages on the underlying mortgage loan collateral ranged
from 2% to 41% and loss severities ranged from 10% to 74%. For bonds in which
the Company has recognized an other-than-temporary impairment charge, the weighted-average
percentage of default collateral was 25% and the weighted-average loss severity was 51%. For bonds
without other-than-temporary impairment losses, the weighted-average default percentage and loss
severity were 11% and 37%, respectively. Underlying mortgage loan collateral cash flows, after
considering the impact of estimated credit losses, were distributed by the model to the various
securities within the securitization structure to determine the timing and extent of losses at the
bond-level, if any. The other-than-temporary impairment losses recognized in the consolidated
statement of income were net of $3 million of unrealized losses for the same securities resulting
from other factors that have been reflected in accumulated other comprehensive income. Despite
rising levels of delinquencies and losses in the underlying residential mortgage loan collateral,
given credit enhancements resulting from the structures of individual bonds, the Company has
concluded that as of March 31, 2010 its remaining privately issued mortgage-backed securities were
not other-than-temporarily impaired. Nevertheless, given recent market conditions, it is possible
that adverse changes in repayment performance and fair value could occur in the remainder of 2010
and later years that could impact the Companys conclusions. Management has modeled cash flows from
privately issued mortgage-backed securities under various scenarios and has concluded that even if
home price depreciation and current delinquency trends persist for an extended period of
- 70 -
time, the
Companys principal losses on its privately issued mortgage-backed securities would be
substantially less than their current fair valuation losses.
At March 31, 2010, the Company also had net pre-tax unrealized losses of $2 million on
$411 million of trust preferred securities issued by financial institutions, securities backed by
trust preferred securities issued by financial institutions and other entities, and other debt
securities (including $23 million of unrealized gains on $126 million of securities using a Level 3
valuation and $25 million of net unrealized losses on $285 million of securities classified as
Level 2 valuations). Pre-tax net unrealized losses of $29 million existed on $384 million of such
securities at December 31, 2009. After evaluating the expected repayment performance of financial
institutions where trust preferred securities were held directly by the Company or were within the
securities backed by trust preferred securities, the Company did not recognize any significant
other-than-temporary impairment losses related to those securities during the quarter ended March
31, 2010.
The Company also holds municipal bonds, mortgage-backed securities guaranteed by government
agencies and certain collateralized mortgage obligations securitized by Bayview Financial in its
held-to-maturity investment securities portfolio. The Company purchased certain private placement
CMOs during the third quarter of 2008 that had been securitized by Bayview Financial Holdings, L.P.
(together with its affiliates, Bayview Financial), a privately-held specialty mortgage finance
company and the majority investor of BLG. Given the Companys relationship with Bayview Financial,
at that time the Company reconsidered its intention to hold other CMOs securitized by Bayview
Financial with a cost basis of $385 million and a fair value of $298 million and transferred such
securities from its available-for-sale investment securities portfolio to its held-to-maturity
investment securities portfolio. As a result, at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the Company
had in its held-to-maturity portfolio CMOs securitized by Bayview Financial with an amortized cost
basis of $342 million and $352 million, respectively, (including the effect of $65 million and
$68 million, respectively, of unamortized fair value adjustment (pre-tax) residing in accumulated
other comprehensive income from the time of transfer) and a fair value of $204 million and
$201 million, respectively. Given the credit enhancements within each of the individual bond
structures, the Company has determined that it expects to fully collect its contractual
principal and interest payments on the private CMOs securitized by Bayview Financial and
therefore believes such securities were not other-than-temporarily impaired at March 31, 2010.
As of March 31, 2010, based on a review of each of the remaining securities in the investment
securities portfolio, the Company concluded that the declines in the values of those
securities were temporary and that any additional other-than-temporary impairment charges were
not appropriate at March 31, 2010. As of that date, the Company did not intend to sell nor is
it anticipated that it would be required to sell any of its impaired securities, that is where
fair value is less than the cost basis of the security. The Company intends to closely monitor
the performance of the privately issued mortgage-backed securities and other securities to
assess if changes in their underlying credit performance or other events cause the cost basis
of those securities to become other-than-temporarily impaired. However, because the unrealized
losses on available-for-sale investment securities have generally already been reflected in
the financial statement values for investment securities and stockholders equity, any
recognition of an other-than-temporary decline in value of those investment securities would
not have a material effect on the Companys consolidated financial condition. Any
other-than-temporary impairment charge related to held-to-maturity securities would result in
reductions in the financial statement values for investment securities and stockholders
equity. Additional information concerning fair
- 71 -
value measurements and the Companys approach
to the classification of such measurements is included in note 11 of Notes to Financial
Statements.
Adjustments to reflect the funded status of defined benefit pension and other postretirement
plans, net of applicable tax effect, reduced accumulated other comprehensive income by $116 million
or $.98 per common share, at March 31, 2010, $117 million, or $.99 per common share, at December
31, 2009, and $174 million, or $1.56 per common share, at March 31, 2009. The decrease in such
adjustment at the two most recent quarter-ends as compared with March 31, 2009 was predominantly
the result of actual investment performance of assets held by the Companys qualified pension plan
being significantly better than that assumed for actuarial purposes.
Cash dividends paid on M&Ts common stock during the quarter ended March 31, 2010 totaled $84
million, compared with $78 million and $83 million in the quarters ended March 31, 2009 and
December 31, 2009, respectively, and represented a quarterly dividend payment of $.70 per
common share in each of those three quarters. A cash dividend of $7.5 million, or $12.50 per
share, was paid in each of the first quarter of 2010 and the fourth quarter of 2009 to the
U.S. Treasury on M&Ts Series A Preferred Stock, issued on December 23, 2008. The cash
dividend paid during 2009s initial quarter on that preferred stock was $4 million, or $7.22
per share. Cash dividends of $663 thousand and $2 million ($25.00 per share and $12.50 per
share) were paid on M&Ts Series B and Series C Preferred Stock, respectively, during each of
the first quarter of 2010 and the fourth quarter of 2009. Those series of preferred stock
were created in connection with the Provident transaction.
The Company did not repurchase any shares of its common stock during 2009 or the first quarter of
2010.
Federal regulators generally require banking institutions to maintain Tier 1 capital and
total capital ratios of at least 4% and 8%, respectively, of risk-adjusted total assets. In
addition to the risk-based measures, Federal bank regulators have also implemented a minimum
leverage ratio guideline of 3% of the quarterly average of total assets. As of March 31, 2010,
Tier 1 capital included $1.1 billion of trust preferred securities
described in note 4 of Notes to Financial Statements and total capital further included
subordinated capital notes of $1.6 billion.
The regulatory capital ratios of the Company, M&T Bank and M&T Bank, N.A. as of March 31, 2010 are
presented in the accompanying table.
REGULATORY CAPITAL RATIOS
March 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M&T |
|
M&T |
|
M&T |
|
|
(Consolidated) |
|
Bank |
|
Bank, N.A. |
Tier 1 capital |
|
|
8.88 |
% |
|
|
8.24 |
% |
|
|
20.48 |
% |
Total capital |
|
|
12.62 |
% |
|
|
12.03 |
% |
|
|
21.07 |
% |
Tier 1 leverage |
|
|
8.59 |
% |
|
|
7.92 |
% |
|
|
19.97 |
% |
Segment Information
As required by GAAP, the Companys reportable segments have been determined based upon its
internal profitability reporting system, which is organized by strategic business unit.
Financial information about the Companys segments is presented in note 13 of Notes to
Financial Statements.
The Business Banking segments net income aggregated $25 million in the first quarter of 2010,
down 16% from $30 million earned in the first three months of 2009 and 14% below $29 million
in 2009s fourth quarter. The decrease in net income from the year-earlier quarter was largely
the result
- 72 -
of an $11 million rise in the provision for credit losses, due to higher net
charge-offs of loans, partially offset by higher net interest income of $6 million. The
increase in net interest income was attributable to the impact of higher average deposit and
loan balances of $879 million and $394 million, respectively, that were predominantly due to
the acquisition of Provident. Contributing to the recent quarters decline in net income as
compared with the fourth quarter of 2009 was a $5 million increase in the provision for credit
losses, due to higher net charge-offs of loans, and lower net interest income of $3 million,
partly the result of a 4% decline in average deposit balances.
Net income for the Commercial Banking segment totaled $77 million in the recent quarter, 34%
higher than the $57 million recorded in the first quarter of 2009 and up 8% from the $71
million earned in the immediately preceding quarter. The rise in net income from the
year-earlier period was largely the result of a $19 million increase in net interest income,
due to a 33 basis point widening of the net interest margin on loans and a $2.6 billion
increase in average noninterest-bearing deposit balances. Approximately 30% of the increase
in net interest income was attributable to the Provident acquisition. Also contributing to
the improved net income were a $10 million decrease in the provision for credit losses, due to
a decline in average loan balances and lower net charge-offs of loans, and higher fees earned
for providing loan syndication services of $4 million. Those positive factors were partially
offset by higher FDIC assessments of $3 million. The favorable performance as compared with
the fourth quarter of 2009 was mainly the result of a $9 million decline in the provision for
credit losses, resulting from lower net charge-offs of loans.
The Commercial Real Estate segments net income was $44 million in 2010s initial quarter, up
slightly from $43 million in the year-earlier quarter, but 6% below the $47 million earned in
the fourth quarter of 2009. The primary contributor to the higher net income as compared with
the first quarter of 2009 was a $17 million improvement in net interest
income, mainly due to increases in average outstanding loan and deposit balances of $1.5
billion and $672 million, respectively. Approximately 80% of the increase in net interest
income was due to the acquisition of Provident. A $4 million rise in revenues from commercial
mortgage banking activities also contributed to the improvement. Those factors were largely
offset by a $15 million increase in the provision for credit losses, driven by higher net
charge-offs of loans, and higher personnel costs of $2 million. As compared with the fourth
quarter of 2009, lower net interest income of $3 million, the result of a 3 basis point
narrowing of this segments loan net interest margin, and a $2 million rise in the provision
for credit losses contributed to the decline in net income.
The Discretionary Portfolio segment incurred a net loss of $16 million for the three-month period
ended March 31, 2010, compared with net losses of $5 million and $9 million in the three-month
periods ended March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2009, respectively. Reflected in the results of
each of those quarters were pre-tax other-than-temporary impairment charges of $27 million,
$32 million and $34 million, respectively. The impairment charges recorded in the initial
quarters of 2010 and 2009 were on certain privately issued CMOs, while the charges in the
final 2009 quarter related predominantly to privately issued CMOs and certain CDOs. All of
the impairment charges relate to bonds in the Companys available-for-sale investment
securities portfolio. Excluding the impact of the impairment losses, the main factors
contributing to the recent quarters higher net loss as compared with the first quarter of
2009 were a $28 million decline in net interest income, the result of a 41 basis point
narrowing of this segments net interest margin, offset, in part, by a $5 million decrease in
the provision for credit losses, due to lower net charge-offs of loans. Contributing to the
higher net loss in 2010s initial quarter as compared with the fourth quarter of 2009 were
lower net interest income of $27 million, due to a 42 basis point narrowing of the net
interest
- 73 -
margin, partially offset by a lower provision for credit losses of $8 million, due to
decreased net charge-offs of loans.
Net contribution from the Residential Mortgage Banking segment was $1 million and $6 million in
the first quarter of 2010 and 2009, respectively, compared with a net loss of $9 million in
the final quarter of 2009. Contributing to the reduced net income as compared with the first
three months of 2009 were a $13 million decline in noninterest revenues from residential
mortgage origination activities and a $4 million partial reversal of the capitalized mortgage
servicing rights valuation allowance recorded in 2009s first quarter. The decline in
residential mortgage origination revenues was predominately attributable to lower origination
volumes. Offsetting those factors were an $11 million decrease in the provision for credit
losses, due largely to lower net charge-offs of loans to builders and developers of
residential real estate properties, and a $2 million decline in personnel costs. The recent
quarters improvement in net income as compared with the fourth quarter of 2009 was mainly the
result of a lower provision for credit losses of $22 million, due to a decrease in net charge-offs
of loans to builders and developers of residential real estate properties, partially
offset by a $4 million decline in noninterest revenues from residential mortgage origination
activities, resulting from lower origination volumes, and a $3 million partial reversal of the
capitalized mortgage servicing rights valuation allowance recorded in 2009s fourth quarter.
Net income for the Retail Banking segment aggregated $59 million during the quarter ended March
31, 2010, up 13% from the $52 million earned in the year-earlier quarter and 4% above the $57
million recorded in the fourth quarter of 2009. The following factors contributed to the
recent quarters higher net income as compared with the first quarter of 2009:
a $17 million rise in fees earned for providing deposit account services resulting from the
Provident acquisition; a $6 million decrease in the provision for credit losses, attributable
to lower net charge-offs of loans; and a $5 million improvement in net interest income, due to
increases in both average deposit and loan balances of $1.4 billion and $1.1 billion. Those
favorable factors were partially offset by higher personnel and occupancy costs of $8 million
and $5 million, respectively, due to operations acquired in the Provident transaction, and
increases in FDIC assessments of $3 million. The improved contribution as compared with the
final 2009 quarter was attributable to a $6 million decrease in the provision for credit
losses, driven by lower net charge-offs of loans, a decline in personnel costs of $3 million,
and generally lower operating expenses, including lower costs for advertising, promotion and
professional services, that were largely offset by a $10 million decline in revenue earned for
providing deposit account services, resulting from seasonal declines in customer transaction
volumes, and higher FDIC assessments of $3 million.
The All Other category reflects other activities of the Company that are not directly
attributable to the reported segments. Reflected in this category are the amortization of core
deposit and other intangible assets resulting from the acquisitions of financial institutions,
M&Ts equity in the earnings (loss) of BLG, merger-related gains and expenses resulting from
acquisitions of financial institutions and the net impact of the Companys allocation methodologies
for internal transfers for funding charges and credits associated with the earning assets and
interest-bearing liabilities of the Companys reportable segments and the provision for credit
losses. The various components of the All Other category resulted in net losses of $38 million
in the first quarter of 2010, $119 million in the year-earlier quarter and $49 million in the
fourth quarter of 2009. The main factors contributing to the lower net loss in the recent quarter
as compared with the year-earlier quarter were the favorable impact from the Companys allocation
methodologies for internal transfers for funding charges and credits associated with the earning
assets and interest-bearing liabilities of the Companys reportable segments and the provision for
credit losses. The
- 74 -
following favorable factors contributed to the lower net losses as compared with
the fourth quarter of 2009: the favorable impact from the Companys allocation methodologies for
internal transfers for funding charges and credits associated with the earning assets and
interest-bearing liabilities of the Companys reportable segments and the provision for credit
losses; lower costs for professional services and merger-related expenses associated with the
Provident and Bradford acquisition transactions recorded in 2009s fourth quarter (no such expenses
were recorded in the recent quarter). Those factors were partially offset by increases in
personnel and other noninterest expenses associated with the business and support units included in
the All Other category. The higher personnel expenses were largely related to stock-based
compensation expense, payroll-related taxes and unemployment insurance.
Recent Accounting Developments
In June 2009, the FASB amended accounting guidance relating to the consolidation of variable
interest entities to eliminate the quantitative approach previously required for determining the
primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity. The amended guidance instead requires a
reporting entity to qualitatively assess the determination of the primary beneficiary of a variable
interest entity based on whether the reporting entity has the power to direct the activities that
most significantly impact the variable interest entitys economic performance and has the
obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits of the variable interest entity that
could potentially be significant to the variable interest entity. The amended
guidance requires ongoing reassessments of whether the reporting entity is the primary beneficiary
of a variable interest entity. The amended guidance became effective as of January 1, 2010.
In June 2009, the FASB also issued amended accounting guidance relating to accounting for
transfers of financial assets to eliminate the exceptions for qualifying special purpose entities
from the consolidation guidance and the exception that permitted sale accounting for certain
mortgage securitizations when a transferor has not surrendered control over the transferred assets.
The amended guidance became effective as of January 1, 2010. The recognition and measurement
provisions of the amended guidance were applied to transfers that occur on or after the effective
date. Additionally, beginning January 1, 2010, the concept of a
qualifying special purpose entity
is no longer relevant for accounting purposes. Therefore, formerly
qualifying special purpose
entities must now be evaluated for consolidation in accordance with applicable consolidation
guidance, including the new accounting guidance relating to the consolidation of variable interest
entities discussed in the previous paragraph.
Effective January 1, 2010, the Company includes in its consolidated financial statements
one-to-four family residential mortgage loans that were included in two separate non-recourse
securitization transactions using qualified special trusts. The effect of that consolidation was to
increase loans receivable by $424 million, decrease the amortized cost of available-for-sale
investment securities by $360 million (fair value of $355 million), and increase borrowings by
$65 million. Information concerning these securitization transactions is included in note 10 of
Notes to Financial Statements.
In January 2010, the FASB amended fair value measurement and disclosure guidance to require
disclosure of significant transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements and
the reasons for the transfers and to require separate presentation of information about purchases,
sales, issuances and settlements in the roll forward of activity in Level 3 fair value
measurements. The amended guidance also clarifies existing requirements that (i) fair value
measurement disclosures should be disaggregated for each
- 75 -
class of asset and liability and
(ii) disclosures about valuation techniques and inputs for both recurring and nonrecurring Level 2
and Level 3 fair value measurements should be provided. The guidance is effective for interim and
annual periods beginning after December 15, 2009, except for the disclosures about purchases,
sales, issuances and settlements in the roll forward of activity in Level 3 fair value
measurements, which are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010 and for
interim periods within those years. The adoption of this guidance did not impact the Companys
financial position or results of operations.
In March 2010, the FASB amended accounting guidance relating to a scope exception for
derivative accounting to clarify that only embedded credit derivative features related to the
transfer of credit risk in the form of subordination of one financial instrument to another should
not be analyzed for potential bifurcation from the host contract and separate accounting as a
derivative. Embedded credit derivative features in a form other than subordination do not qualify
for the scope exception, even if their effects are allocated according to subordination provisions.
The guidance is effective at the beginning of the first quarter beginning after June 15, 2010.
The Company does not anticipate that the adoption of this guidance will have a significant impact
on the reporting of its financial position or results of its operations.
Forward-Looking Statements
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and
other sections of this quarterly report contain forward-looking statements that are based on
current expectations, estimates and projections about the Companys business, managements beliefs
and assumptions made by management. These statements are not guarantees of future performance and
involve certain risks, uncertainties and assumptions (Future Factors) which are difficult to
predict. Therefore, actual outcomes and results may differ materially from what is expressed or
forecasted in such forward-looking statements.
Future Factors include changes in interest rates, spreads on earning assets and
interest-bearing liabilities, and interest rate sensitivity; prepayment speeds, loan originations,
credit losses and market values on loans, collateral securing loans and other assets; sources of
liquidity; common shares outstanding; common stock price volatility; fair value of and number of
stock-based compensation awards to be issued in future periods; legislation affecting the financial
services industry as a whole, and M&T and its subsidiaries individually or collectively, including
tax legislation; regulatory supervision and oversight, including monetary policy and required
capital levels; changes in accounting policies or procedures as may be required by the FASB or
other regulatory agencies; increasing price and product/service competition by competitors,
including new entrants; rapid technological developments and changes; the ability to continue to
introduce competitive new products and services on a timely, cost-effective basis; the mix of
products/services; containing costs and expenses; governmental and public policy changes;
protection and validity of intellectual property rights; reliance on large customers;
technological, implementation and cost/financial risks in large, multi-year contracts; the outcome
of pending and future litigation and governmental proceedings, including tax-related examinations
and other matters; continued availability of financing; financial resources in the amounts, at the
times and on the terms required to support M&T and its subsidiaries future businesses; and
material differences in the actual financial results of merger, acquisition and investment
activities compared with M&Ts initial expectations, including the full realization of anticipated
cost savings and revenue enhancements.
- 76 -
These are representative of the Future Factors that could affect the outcome of the
forward-looking statements. In addition, such statements could be affected by general industry
and market conditions and growth rates, general economic and political conditions, either
nationally or in the states in which M&T and its subsidiaries do business, including interest
rate and currency exchange rate fluctuations, changes and trends in the securities markets,
and other Future Factors.
- 77 -
M&T BANK CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Table 1
QUARTERLY TRENDS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 Quarters |
|
|
First Quarter |
|
Fourth |
|
Third |
|
Second |
|
First |
|
Earnings and dividends |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts in thousands, except per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income (taxable-equivalent basis) |
|
$ |
682,309 |
|
|
|
698,556 |
|
|
|
706,388 |
|
|
|
682,637 |
|
|
|
659,445 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
120,052 |
|
|
|
133,950 |
|
|
|
152,938 |
|
|
|
175,856 |
|
|
|
206,705 |
|
|
Net interest income |
|
|
562,257 |
|
|
|
564,606 |
|
|
|
553,450 |
|
|
|
506,781 |
|
|
|
452,740 |
|
Less: provision for credit losses |
|
|
105,000 |
|
|
|
145,000 |
|
|
|
154,000 |
|
|
|
147,000 |
|
|
|
158,000 |
|
Other income |
|
|
257,706 |
|
|
|
265,890 |
|
|
|
278,226 |
|
|
|
271,649 |
|
|
|
232,341 |
|
Less: other expense |
|
|
489,362 |
|
|
|
478,451 |
|
|
|
500,056 |
|
|
|
563,710 |
|
|
|
438,346 |
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
225,601 |
|
|
|
207,045 |
|
|
|
177,620 |
|
|
|
67,720 |
|
|
|
88,735 |
|
Applicable income taxes |
|
|
68,723 |
|
|
|
64,340 |
|
|
|
44,161 |
|
|
|
11,318 |
|
|
|
19,581 |
|
Taxable-equivalent adjustment |
|
|
5,923 |
|
|
|
5,887 |
|
|
|
5,795 |
|
|
|
5,214 |
|
|
|
4,933 |
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
150,955 |
|
|
|
136,818 |
|
|
|
127,664 |
|
|
|
51,188 |
|
|
|
64,221 |
|
|
Net income available to common equity |
|
$ |
138,341 |
|
|
|
124,251 |
|
|
|
115,143 |
|
|
|
40,964 |
|
|
|
55,322 |
|
Per common share data |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings |
|
$ |
1.16 |
|
|
|
1.05 |
|
|
|
.97 |
|
|
|
.36 |
|
|
|
.49 |
|
Diluted earnings |
|
|
1.15 |
|
|
|
1.04 |
|
|
|
.97 |
|
|
|
.36 |
|
|
|
.49 |
|
Cash dividends |
|
$ |
.70 |
|
|
|
.70 |
|
|
|
.70 |
|
|
|
.70 |
|
|
|
.70 |
|
Average common shares outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
117,765 |
|
|
|
117,506 |
|
|
|
117,370 |
|
|
|
113,218 |
|
|
|
110,439 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
118,256 |
|
|
|
117,672 |
|
|
|
117,547 |
|
|
|
113,521 |
|
|
|
110,439 |
|
|
Performance ratios, annualized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average assets |
|
|
.89 |
% |
|
|
.79 |
% |
|
|
.73 |
% |
|
|
.31 |
% |
|
|
.40 |
% |
Average common stockholders equity |
|
|
7.86 |
% |
|
|
7.09 |
% |
|
|
6.72 |
% |
|
|
2.53 |
% |
|
|
3.61 |
% |
Net interest margin on average earning assets
(taxable-equivalent basis) |
|
|
3.78 |
% |
|
|
3.71 |
% |
|
|
3.61 |
% |
|
|
3.43 |
% |
|
|
3.19 |
% |
Nonaccrual loans to total loans and leases,
net of unearned discount |
|
|
2.60 |
% |
|
|
2.56 |
% |
|
|
2.35 |
% |
|
|
2.11 |
% |
|
|
2.05 |
% |
Efficiency ratio (a) |
|
|
57.82 |
% |
|
|
54.62 |
% |
|
|
57.21 |
% |
|
|
61.93 |
% |
|
|
60.82 |
% |
|
Net operating (tangible) results (b) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating income (in thousands) |
|
$ |
160,953 |
|
|
|
150,776 |
|
|
|
128,761 |
|
|
|
100,805 |
|
|
|
75,034 |
|
Diluted net operating income per common share |
|
|
1.23 |
|
|
|
1.16 |
|
|
|
.98 |
|
|
|
.79 |
|
|
|
.59 |
|
Annualized return on |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average tangible assets |
|
|
1.00 |
% |
|
|
.92 |
% |
|
|
.78 |
% |
|
|
.64 |
% |
|
|
.50 |
% |
Average tangible common equity |
|
|
17.34 |
% |
|
|
16.73 |
% |
|
|
14.87 |
% |
|
|
12.08 |
% |
|
|
9.36 |
% |
Efficiency ratio (a) |
|
|
55.88 |
% |
|
|
52.69 |
% |
|
|
55.21 |
% |
|
|
60.03 |
% |
|
|
58.68 |
% |
|
Balance sheet data |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In millions, except per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average balances |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets (c) |
|
$ |
68,883 |
|
|
|
68,919 |
|
|
|
69,154 |
|
|
|
66,984 |
|
|
|
64,766 |
|
Total tangible assets (c) |
|
|
65,216 |
|
|
|
65,240 |
|
|
|
65,462 |
|
|
|
63,500 |
|
|
|
61,420 |
|
Earning assets |
|
|
60,331 |
|
|
|
60,451 |
|
|
|
60,900 |
|
|
|
59,297 |
|
|
|
57,509 |
|
Investment securities |
|
|
8,172 |
|
|
|
8,197 |
|
|
|
8,420 |
|
|
|
8,508 |
|
|
|
8,490 |
|
Loans and leases, net of unearned discount |
|
|
51,948 |
|
|
|
52,087 |
|
|
|
52,320 |
|
|
|
50,554 |
|
|
|
48,824 |
|
Deposits |
|
|
47,394 |
|
|
|
47,365 |
|
|
|
46,720 |
|
|
|
43,846 |
|
|
|
41,487 |
|
Common equity (c) |
|
|
7,136 |
|
|
|
6,957 |
|
|
|
6,794 |
|
|
|
6,491 |
|
|
|
6,212 |
|
Tangible common equity (c) |
|
|
3,469 |
|
|
|
3,278 |
|
|
|
3,102 |
|
|
|
3,007 |
|
|
|
2,866 |
|
|
At end of quarter |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets (c) |
|
$ |
68,439 |
|
|
|
68,880 |
|
|
|
68,997 |
|
|
|
69,913 |
|
|
|
64,883 |
|
Total tangible assets (c) |
|
|
64,778 |
|
|
|
65,208 |
|
|
|
65,312 |
|
|
|
66,215 |
|
|
|
61,544 |
|
Earning assets |
|
|
59,741 |
|
|
|
59,928 |
|
|
|
59,993 |
|
|
|
61,044 |
|
|
|
56,823 |
|
Investment securities |
|
|
8,105 |
|
|
|
7,781 |
|
|
|
7,634 |
|
|
|
8,155 |
|
|
|
7,687 |
|
Loans and leases, net of unearned discount |
|
|
51,444 |
|
|
|
51,937 |
|
|
|
52,204 |
|
|
|
52,715 |
|
|
|
48,918 |
|
Deposits |
|
|
47,538 |
|
|
|
47,450 |
|
|
|
46,862 |
|
|
|
46,755 |
|
|
|
42,477 |
|
Common equity, net of undeclared
preferred dividends (c) |
|
|
7,177 |
|
|
|
7,017 |
|
|
|
6,879 |
|
|
|
6,669 |
|
|
|
6,329 |
|
Tangible common equity (c) |
|
|
3,516 |
|
|
|
3,345 |
|
|
|
3,194 |
|
|
|
2,971 |
|
|
|
2,990 |
|
Equity per common share |
|
|
60.40 |
|
|
|
59.31 |
|
|
|
58.22 |
|
|
|
56.51 |
|
|
|
56.95 |
|
Tangible equity per common share |
|
|
29.59 |
|
|
|
28.27 |
|
|
|
27.03 |
|
|
|
25.17 |
|
|
|
26.90 |
|
|
Market price per common share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High |
|
$ |
85.00 |
|
|
|
69.89 |
|
|
|
67.46 |
|
|
|
61.87 |
|
|
|
59.08 |
|
Low |
|
|
66.32 |
|
|
|
59.09 |
|
|
|
50.33 |
|
|
|
43.50 |
|
|
|
29.11 |
|
Closing |
|
|
79.38 |
|
|
|
66.89 |
|
|
|
62.32 |
|
|
|
50.93 |
|
|
|
45.24 |
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Excludes impact of merger-related gains and expenses and
net securities transactions. |
|
(b) |
|
Excludes amortization and balances related to goodwill and core deposit and other intangible assets and merger-related gains and
expenses which, except in the calculation of the efficiency ratio, are net of applicable income tax effects. A reconciliation of net
income and net operating income appears in table 2. |
|
(c) |
|
The difference between total assets and total tangible assets, and common equity and tangible common equity, represents goodwill,
core deposit and other intangible assets, net of applicable deferred
tax balances. A reconciliation of such balances appears in table 2. |
- 78 -
M&T BANK CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Table 2
RECONCILIATION OF QUARTERLY GAAP TO NON-GAAP MEASURES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 Quarters |
|
|
First Quarter |
|
Fourth |
|
Third |
|
Second |
|
First |
|
Income statement data |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In thousands, except per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
150,955 |
|
|
|
136,818 |
|
|
|
127,664 |
|
|
|
51,188 |
|
|
|
64,221 |
|
Amortization of core deposit and other
intangible assets (a) |
|
|
9,998 |
|
|
|
10,152 |
|
|
|
10,270 |
|
|
|
9,247 |
|
|
|
9,337 |
|
Merger-related gain (a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17,684 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Merger-related expenses (a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,806 |
|
|
|
8,511 |
|
|
|
40,370 |
|
|
|
1,476 |
|
|
Net operating income |
|
$ |
160,953 |
|
|
|
150,776 |
|
|
|
128,761 |
|
|
|
100,805 |
|
|
|
75,034 |
|
|
Earnings per common share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per common share |
|
$ |
1.15 |
|
|
|
1.04 |
|
|
|
.97 |
|
|
|
.36 |
|
|
|
.49 |
|
Amortization of core deposit and other
intangible assets (a) |
|
|
.08 |
|
|
|
.09 |
|
|
|
.09 |
|
|
|
.08 |
|
|
|
.09 |
|
Merger-related gain (a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(.15 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Merger-related expenses (a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
.03 |
|
|
|
.07 |
|
|
|
.35 |
|
|
|
.01 |
|
|
Diluted net operating earnings per common share |
|
$ |
1.23 |
|
|
|
1.16 |
|
|
|
.98 |
|
|
|
.79 |
|
|
|
.59 |
|
|
Other expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other expense |
|
$ |
489,362 |
|
|
|
478,451 |
|
|
|
500,056 |
|
|
|
563,710 |
|
|
|
438,346 |
|
Amortization of core deposit and other
intangible assets |
|
|
(16,475 |
) |
|
|
(16,730 |
) |
|
|
(16,924 |
) |
|
|
(15,231 |
) |
|
|
(15,370 |
) |
Merger-related expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,264 |
) |
|
|
(14,010 |
) |
|
|
(66,457 |
) |
|
|
(2,426 |
) |
|
Noninterest operating expense |
|
$ |
472,887 |
|
|
|
455,457 |
|
|
|
469,122 |
|
|
|
482,022 |
|
|
|
420,550 |
|
|
Merger-related expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries and employee benefits |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
381 |
|
|
|
870 |
|
|
|
8,768 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
Equipment and net occupancy |
|
|
|
|
|
|
545 |
|
|
|
1,845 |
|
|
|
581 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
Printing, postage and supplies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
233 |
|
|
|
629 |
|
|
|
2,514 |
|
|
|
301 |
|
Other costs of operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,105 |
|
|
|
10,666 |
|
|
|
54,594 |
|
|
|
2,110 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
6,264 |
|
|
|
14,010 |
|
|
|
66,457 |
|
|
|
2,426 |
|
|
Balance sheet data |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In millions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average assets |
|
$ |
68,883 |
|
|
|
68,919 |
|
|
|
69,154 |
|
|
|
66,984 |
|
|
|
64,766 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
(3,525 |
) |
|
|
(3,525 |
) |
|
|
(3,525 |
) |
|
|
(3,326 |
) |
|
|
(3,192 |
) |
Core deposit and other intangible assets |
|
|
(176 |
) |
|
|
(191 |
) |
|
|
(208 |
) |
|
|
(188 |
) |
|
|
(176 |
) |
Deferred taxes |
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
Average tangible assets |
|
$ |
65,216 |
|
|
|
65,240 |
|
|
|
65,462 |
|
|
|
63,500 |
|
|
|
61,420 |
|
|
Average common equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average total equity |
|
$ |
7,868 |
|
|
|
7,686 |
|
|
|
7,521 |
|
|
|
7,127 |
|
|
|
6,780 |
|
Preferred stock |
|
|
(732 |
) |
|
|
(729 |
) |
|
|
(727 |
) |
|
|
(636 |
) |
|
|
(568 |
) |
|
Average common equity |
|
|
7,136 |
|
|
|
6,957 |
|
|
|
6,794 |
|
|
|
6,491 |
|
|
|
6,212 |
|
|
Goodwill |
|
|
(3,525 |
) |
|
|
(3,525 |
) |
|
|
(3,525 |
) |
|
|
(3,326 |
) |
|
|
(3,192 |
) |
Core deposit and other intangible assets |
|
|
(176 |
) |
|
|
(191 |
) |
|
|
(208 |
) |
|
|
(188 |
) |
|
|
(176 |
) |
Deferred taxes |
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
Average tangible common equity |
|
$ |
3,469 |
|
|
|
3,278 |
|
|
|
3,102 |
|
|
|
3,007 |
|
|
|
2,866 |
|
|
At end of quarter |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
68,439 |
|
|
|
68,880 |
|
|
|
68,997 |
|
|
|
69,913 |
|
|
|
64,883 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
(3,525 |
) |
|
|
(3,525 |
) |
|
|
(3,525 |
) |
|
|
(3,525 |
) |
|
|
(3,192 |
) |
Core deposit and other intangible assets |
|
|
(167 |
) |
|
|
(182 |
) |
|
|
(199 |
) |
|
|
(216 |
) |
|
|
(168 |
) |
Deferred taxes |
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
Total tangible assets |
|
$ |
64,778 |
|
|
|
65,208 |
|
|
|
65,312 |
|
|
|
66,215 |
|
|
|
61,544 |
|
|
Total common equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity |
|
$ |
7,916 |
|
|
|
7,753 |
|
|
|
7,612 |
|
|
|
7,400 |
|
|
|
6,902 |
|
Preferred stock |
|
|
(733 |
) |
|
|
(730 |
) |
|
|
(728 |
) |
|
|
(725 |
) |
|
|
(568 |
) |
Undeclared dividends preferred stock |
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
Common equity, net of undeclared preferred dividends |
|
|
7,177 |
|
|
|
7,017 |
|
|
|
6,879 |
|
|
|
6,669 |
|
|
|
6,329 |
|
|
Goodwill |
|
|
(3,525 |
) |
|
|
(3,525 |
) |
|
|
(3,525 |
) |
|
|
(3,525 |
) |
|
|
(3,192 |
) |
Core deposit and other intangible assets |
|
|
(167 |
) |
|
|
(182 |
) |
|
|
(199 |
) |
|
|
(216 |
) |
|
|
(168 |
) |
Deferred taxes |
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
Total tangible common equity |
|
$ |
3,516 |
|
|
|
3,345 |
|
|
|
3,194 |
|
|
|
2,971 |
|
|
|
2,990 |
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
After any related tax effect. |
- 79 -
M&T BANK CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Table 3
AVERAGE BALANCE SHEETS AND ANNUALIZED TAXABLE-EQUIVALENT RATES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 First Quarter |
|
2009 Fourth Quarter |
|
2009 Third Quarter |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
Average balance in millions; interest in thousands |
|
Balance |
|
Interest |
|
Rate |
|
Balance |
|
Interest |
|
Rate |
|
Balance |
|
Interest |
|
Rate |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earning assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans and leases, net of unearned discount* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial, financial, etc. |
|
$ |
13,408 |
|
|
$ |
128,147 |
|
|
|
3.88 |
% |
|
|
13,527 |
|
|
|
132,068 |
|
|
|
3.87 |
% |
|
|
13,801 |
|
|
|
131,433 |
|
|
|
3.78 |
% |
Real estate commercial |
|
|
20,867 |
|
|
|
233,561 |
|
|
|
4.48 |
|
|
|
20,950 |
|
|
|
234,541 |
|
|
|
4.48 |
|
|
|
20,843 |
|
|
|
233,370 |
|
|
|
4.48 |
|
Real estate consumer |
|
|
5,742 |
|
|
|
76,283 |
|
|
|
5.31 |
|
|
|
5,457 |
|
|
|
73,290 |
|
|
|
5.37 |
|
|
|
5,429 |
|
|
|
73,752 |
|
|
|
5.43 |
|
Consumer |
|
|
11,931 |
|
|
|
154,688 |
|
|
|
5.26 |
|
|
|
12,153 |
|
|
|
162,832 |
|
|
|
5.32 |
|
|
|
12,247 |
|
|
|
165,665 |
|
|
|
5.37 |
|
|
Total loans and leases, net |
|
|
51,948 |
|
|
|
592,679 |
|
|
|
4.63 |
|
|
|
52,087 |
|
|
|
602,731 |
|
|
|
4.59 |
|
|
|
52,320 |
|
|
|
604,220 |
|
|
|
4.58 |
|
|
Interest-bearing deposits at banks |
|
|
127 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
.02 |
|
|
|
74 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
.08 |
|
|
|
66 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
.04 |
|
Federal funds sold and agreements
to resell securities |
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
.22 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
.19 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
.58 |
|
Trading account |
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
121 |
|
|
|
.80 |
|
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
117 |
|
|
|
.66 |
|
|
|
83 |
|
|
|
169 |
|
|
|
.82 |
|
Investment securities** |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury and federal agencies |
|
|
4,396 |
|
|
|
49,131 |
|
|
|
4.53 |
|
|
|
3,880 |
|
|
|
44,984 |
|
|
|
4.60 |
|
|
|
3,803 |
|
|
|
45,216 |
|
|
|
4.72 |
|
Obligations of states and political subdivisions |
|
|
268 |
|
|
|
3,741 |
|
|
|
5.66 |
|
|
|
270 |
|
|
|
4,084 |
|
|
|
5.99 |
|
|
|
278 |
|
|
|
3,965 |
|
|
|
5.66 |
|
Other |
|
|
3,508 |
|
|
|
36,618 |
|
|
|
4.23 |
|
|
|
4,047 |
|
|
|
46,615 |
|
|
|
4.57 |
|
|
|
4,339 |
|
|
|
52,794 |
|
|
|
4.83 |
|
|
Total investment securities |
|
|
8,172 |
|
|
|
89,490 |
|
|
|
4.44 |
|
|
|
8,197 |
|
|
|
95,683 |
|
|
|
4.63 |
|
|
|
8,420 |
|
|
|
101,975 |
|
|
|
4.81 |
|
|
Total earning assets |
|
|
60,331 |
|
|
|
682,309 |
|
|
|
4.59 |
|
|
|
60,451 |
|
|
|
698,556 |
|
|
|
4.58 |
|
|
|
60,900 |
|
|
|
706,388 |
|
|
|
4.60 |
|
|
Allowance for credit losses |
|
|
(900 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(890 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(882 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks |
|
|
1,136 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,184 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,135 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets |
|
|
8,316 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,174 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,001 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
68,883 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
68,919 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
69,154 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing deposits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOW accounts |
|
$ |
585 |
|
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
.14 |
|
|
|
579 |
|
|
|
261 |
|
|
|
.18 |
|
|
|
541 |
|
|
|
288 |
|
|
|
.21 |
|
Savings deposits |
|
|
25,068 |
|
|
|
20,449 |
|
|
|
.33 |
|
|
|
24,237 |
|
|
|
22,190 |
|
|
|
.36 |
|
|
|
23,367 |
|
|
|
22,076 |
|
|
|
.37 |
|
Time deposits |
|
|
7,210 |
|
|
|
29,446 |
|
|
|
1.66 |
|
|
|
8,304 |
|
|
|
39,516 |
|
|
|
1.89 |
|
|
|
9,246 |
|
|
|
50,678 |
|
|
|
2.17 |
|
Deposits at foreign office |
|
|
1,237 |
|
|
|
325 |
|
|
|
.11 |
|
|
|
1,300 |
|
|
|
353 |
|
|
|
.11 |
|
|
|
1,444 |
|
|
|
481 |
|
|
|
.13 |
|
|
Total interest-bearing deposits |
|
|
34,100 |
|
|
|
50,420 |
|
|
|
.60 |
|
|
|
34,420 |
|
|
|
62,320 |
|
|
|
.72 |
|
|
|
34,598 |
|
|
|
73,523 |
|
|
|
.84 |
|
|
Short-term borrowings |
|
|
2,367 |
|
|
|
887 |
|
|
|
.15 |
|
|
|
2,308 |
|
|
|
1,002 |
|
|
|
.17 |
|
|
|
2,663 |
|
|
|
1,764 |
|
|
|
.26 |
|
Long-term borrowings |
|
|
10,160 |
|
|
|
68,745 |
|
|
|
2.74 |
|
|
|
10,253 |
|
|
|
70,628 |
|
|
|
2.73 |
|
|
|
11,008 |
|
|
|
77,651 |
|
|
|
2.80 |
|
|
Total interest-bearing liabilities |
|
|
46,627 |
|
|
|
120,052 |
|
|
|
1.04 |
|
|
|
46,981 |
|
|
|
133,950 |
|
|
|
1.13 |
|
|
|
48,269 |
|
|
|
152,938 |
|
|
|
1.26 |
|
|
Noninterest-bearing deposits |
|
|
13,294 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,945 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,122 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
1,094 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,307 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,242 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
61,015 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
61,233 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
61,633 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity |
|
|
7,868 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,686 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,521 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
68,883 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
68,919 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
69,154 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest spread |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.55 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.45 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.34 |
|
Contribution of interest-free funds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.27 |
|
|
Net interest income/margin on earning assets |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
562,257 |
|
|
|
3.78 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
564,606 |
|
|
|
3.71 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
553,450 |
|
|
|
3.61 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Includes nonaccrual loans. |
(continued) |
|
** |
|
Includes available for sale securities at amortized cost. |
|
- 80 -
M&T BANK CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Table 3 (continued)
AVERAGE BALANCE SHEETS AND ANNUALIZED TAXABLE-EQUIVALENT RATES (continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 Second Quarter |
|
2009 First Quarter |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
Average balance in millions; interest in thousands |
|
Balance |
|
Interest |
|
Rate |
|
Balance |
|
Interest |
|
Rate |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earning assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans and leases, net of unearned discount* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial, financial, etc. |
|
$ |
14,067 |
|
|
$ |
131,886 |
|
|
|
3.76 |
% |
|
|
14,031 |
|
|
|
129,222 |
|
|
|
3.74 |
% |
Real estate commercial |
|
|
19,719 |
|
|
|
219,813 |
|
|
|
4.46 |
|
|
|
18,795 |
|
|
|
206,967 |
|
|
|
4.40 |
|
Real estate consumer |
|
|
5,262 |
|
|
|
71,079 |
|
|
|
5.40 |
|
|
|
5,033 |
|
|
|
70,353 |
|
|
|
5.59 |
|
Consumer |
|
|
11,506 |
|
|
|
155,609 |
|
|
|
5.42 |
|
|
|
10,965 |
|
|
|
151,968 |
|
|
|
5.62 |
|
|
Total loans and leases, net |
|
|
50,554 |
|
|
|
578,387 |
|
|
|
4.59 |
|
|
|
48,824 |
|
|
|
558,510 |
|
|
|
4.64 |
|
|
Interest-bearing deposits at banks |
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
.05 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
.16 |
|
Federal funds sold and agreements
to resell securities |
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
.23 |
|
|
|
102 |
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
.23 |
|
Trading account |
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
231 |
|
|
|
.77 |
|
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
123 |
|
|
|
.67 |
|
Investment securities** |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury and federal agencies |
|
|
3,806 |
|
|
|
46,353 |
|
|
|
4.88 |
|
|
|
3,727 |
|
|
|
45,610 |
|
|
|
4.96 |
|
Obligations of states and political subdivisions |
|
|
198 |
|
|
|
2,924 |
|
|
|
5.94 |
|
|
|
136 |
|
|
|
2,170 |
|
|
|
6.47 |
|
Other |
|
|
4,504 |
|
|
|
54,694 |
|
|
|
4.87 |
|
|
|
4,627 |
|
|
|
52,966 |
|
|
|
4.64 |
|
|
Total investment securities |
|
|
8,508 |
|
|
|
103,971 |
|
|
|
4.90 |
|
|
|
8,490 |
|
|
|
100,746 |
|
|
|
4.81 |
|
|
Total earning assets |
|
|
59,297 |
|
|
|
682,637 |
|
|
|
4.62 |
|
|
|
57,509 |
|
|
|
659,445 |
|
|
|
4.65 |
|
|
Allowance for credit losses |
|
|
(867 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(815 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks |
|
|
1,077 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,086 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets |
|
|
7,477 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,986 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
66,984 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
64,766 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing deposits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOW accounts |
|
$ |
515 |
|
|
|
246 |
|
|
|
.19 |
|
|
|
536 |
|
|
|
327 |
|
|
|
.25 |
|
Savings deposits |
|
|
22,480 |
|
|
|
26,362 |
|
|
|
.47 |
|
|
|
21,203 |
|
|
|
41,922 |
|
|
|
.80 |
|
Time deposits |
|
|
8,858 |
|
|
|
55,697 |
|
|
|
2.52 |
|
|
|
8,720 |
|
|
|
60,329 |
|
|
|
2.81 |
|
Deposits at foreign office |
|
|
1,460 |
|
|
|
576 |
|
|
|
.16 |
|
|
|
2,473 |
|
|
|
981 |
|
|
|
.16 |
|
|
Total interest-bearing deposits |
|
|
33,313 |
|
|
|
82,881 |
|
|
|
1.00 |
|
|
|
32,932 |
|
|
|
103,559 |
|
|
|
1.28 |
|
|
Short-term borrowings |
|
|
3,211 |
|
|
|
2,015 |
|
|
|
.25 |
|
|
|
3,477 |
|
|
|
2,348 |
|
|
|
.27 |
|
Long-term borrowings |
|
|
11,482 |
|
|
|
90,960 |
|
|
|
3.18 |
|
|
|
11,643 |
|
|
|
100,798 |
|
|
|
3.51 |
|
|
Total interest-bearing liabilities |
|
|
48,006 |
|
|
|
175,856 |
|
|
|
1.47 |
|
|
|
48,052 |
|
|
|
206,705 |
|
|
|
1.74 |
|
|
Noninterest-bearing deposits |
|
|
10,533 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,555 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
1,318 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,379 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
59,857 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
57,986 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity |
|
|
7,127 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,780 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
66,984 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
64,766 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest spread |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.91 |
|
Contribution of interest-free funds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.28 |
|
|
Net interest income/margin on earning assets |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
506,781 |
|
|
|
3.43 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
452,740 |
|
|
|
3.19 |
% |
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Includes nonaccrual loans. |
|
** |
|
Includes available for sale securities at amortized cost. |
- 81 -
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
Incorporated by reference to the discussion contained under the caption Taxable-equivalent
Net Interest Income in Part I, Item 2, Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures.
(a) Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures. Based upon their evaluation of the
effectiveness of M&Ts disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)), Robert G. Wilmers, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, and
René F. Jones, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, concluded that M&Ts
disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of March 31, 2010.
(b) Changes in internal control over financial reporting. M&T regularly assesses the adequacy
of its internal control over financial reporting and enhances its controls in response to internal
control assessments and internal and external audit and regulatory recommendations. No changes in
internal control over financial reporting have been identified in connection with the evaluation of
disclosure controls and procedures during the quarter ended March 31, 2010 that have materially
affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, M&Ts internal control over financial
reporting.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings.
M&T and its subsidiaries are subject in the normal course of business to various pending and
threatened legal proceedings in which claims for monetary damages are asserted. Management, after
consultation with legal counsel, does not anticipate that the aggregate ultimate liability arising
out of litigation pending against M&T or its subsidiaries will be material to M&Ts consolidated
financial position, but at the present time is not in a position to determine whether such
litigation will have a material adverse effect on M&Ts consolidated results of operations in any
future reporting period.
Item 1A. Risk Factors.
There have been no material changes in risk factors relating to M&T to those disclosed in
response to Item 1A. to Part I of Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.
- 82 -
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.
(a) (b) Not applicable.
(c)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(d) Maximum |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(c) Total |
|
|
Number (or |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Approximate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Dollar Value) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(or Units) |
|
|
of Shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchased |
|
|
(or Units) |
|
|
|
(a) Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
as Part of |
|
|
that may yet |
|
|
|
Number |
|
|
(b) Average |
|
|
Publicly |
|
|
be Purchased |
|
|
|
of Shares |
|
|
Price Paid |
|
|
Announced |
|
|
Under the |
|
|
|
(or Units) |
|
|
per Share |
|
|
Plans or |
|
|
Plans or |
|
Period |
|
Purchased (1) |
|
|
(or Unit) |
|
|
Programs |
|
|
Programs (2) |
|
|
January 1 January 31, 2010 |
|
|
26,160 |
|
|
$ |
73.45 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,181,500 |
|
|
February 1 February 28, 2010 |
|
|
420 |
|
|
|
78.20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,181,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 1 March 31, 2010 |
|
|
413 |
|
|
|
82.04 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,181,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
26,993 |
|
|
$ |
73.65 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The total number of shares purchased during the periods indicated includes shares deemed
to have been received from employees who exercised stock options by attesting to previously
acquired common shares in satisfaction of the exercise price or shares received from employees
upon the vesting of restricted stock awards in satisfaction of applicable tax withholding
obligations, as is permitted under M&Ts stock-based compensation plans. |
|
(2) |
|
On February 22, 2007, M&T announced a program to purchase up to 5,000,000 shares of its
common stock. No shares were purchased under such program during the periods indicated. |
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities.
(Not applicable.)
Item 4. Other Information.
(None.)
Item 5. Exhibits.
The following exhibits are filed as a part of this report.
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
No. |
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer under Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002. Filed herewith. |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer under Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Filed herewith. |
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer under 18 U.S.C. §1350 pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Filed herewith. |
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer under 18 U.S.C. §1350 pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Filed herewith. |
- 83 -
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M&T BANK CORPORATION
|
|
Date: May 6, 2010 |
By: |
/s/ René F. Jones
|
|
|
|
René F. Jones |
|
|
|
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
No. |
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer under Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002. Filed herewith. |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer under Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002. Filed herewith. |
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer under 18 U.S.C. §1350 pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Filed herewith. |
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer under 18 U.S.C. §1350 pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Filed herewith. |
- 84 -
exv31w1
EXHIBIT 31.1
CERTIFICATIONS
I, Robert G. Wilmers, certify that:
1. |
|
I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of M&T Bank Corporation; |
2. |
|
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report; |
3. |
|
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report; |
4. |
|
The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: |
a) |
|
designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating
to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; |
b) |
|
designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over
financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance
regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements
for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; |
c) |
|
evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
and |
d) |
|
disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial
reporting. |
5. |
|
The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions): |
a) |
|
all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal
control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and |
b) |
|
any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting. |
Date: May 6, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
|
/s/ Robert G. Wilmers
|
|
|
|
Robert G. Wilmers |
|
|
|
Chairman of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer |
|
exv31w2
EXHIBIT 31.2
CERTIFICATIONS
I, René F. Jones, certify that:
1. |
|
I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of M&T Bank Corporation; |
2. |
|
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report; |
3. |
|
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report; |
4. |
|
The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: |
a) |
|
designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating
to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; |
b) |
|
designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over
financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance
regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements
for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; |
c) |
|
evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
and |
d) |
|
disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial
reporting. |
5. |
|
The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions): |
a) |
|
all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal
control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and |
b) |
|
any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting. |
Date: May 6, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
|
/s/ René F. Jones
|
|
|
|
René F. Jones |
|
|
|
Executive Vice President
and Chief Financial Officer |
|
exv32w1
EXHIBIT 32.1
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER UNDER 18 U.S.C. §1350
I, Robert G. Wilmers, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of M&T Bank Corporation,
certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:
|
(1) |
|
the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of M&T Bank Corporation for the quarterly period ended
March 31, 2010 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and |
|
|
(2) |
|
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
M&T Bank Corporation. |
The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 and is not being
filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
/s/ Robert G. Wilmers
Robert G. Wilmers
May 6, 2010
A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form
within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided
to M&T Bank Corporation and will be retained by M&T Bank Corporation and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
exv32w2
EXHIBIT 32.2
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER UNDER 18 U.S.C. §1350
I, René F. Jones, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of M&T Bank Corporation,
certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:
|
(1) |
|
the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of M&T Bank Corporation for the quarterly period ended
March 31, 2010 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and |
|
|
(2) |
|
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
M&T Bank Corporation. |
The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 and is not being
filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
/s/ René F. Jones
René F. Jones
May 6, 2010
A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form
within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided
to M&T Bank Corporation and will be retained by M&T Bank Corporation and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.