e10vq
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2009
or
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
Commission File Number 1-9861
M&T BANK CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
New York
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
16-0968385
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.) |
|
|
|
One M & T Plaza
Buffalo, New York
(Address of principal
|
|
14203
(Zip Code) |
executive offices) |
|
|
(716) 842-5445
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. þ Yes o No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). o Yes
o No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer þ
|
|
Accelerated filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
|
|
Smaller reporting company o |
|
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined
in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). o Yes þ No
Number of shares of the registrants Common Stock, $0.50 par value, outstanding as of the
close of business on July 24, 2009: 117,956,043 shares.
M&T BANK CORPORATION
FORM 10-Q
For the Quarterly Period Ended June 30, 2009
- 2 -
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
|
|
Item 1. |
|
Financial Statements. |
M&T BANK CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET (Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
Dollars in thousands, except per share |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks |
|
$ |
1,148,428 |
|
|
|
1,546,804 |
|
Interest-bearing deposits at banks |
|
|
59,950 |
|
|
|
10,284 |
|
Federal funds sold |
|
|
2,300 |
|
|
|
21,347 |
|
Agreements to resell securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
90,000 |
|
Trading account |
|
|
495,324 |
|
|
|
617,821 |
|
Investment securities (includes pledged securities that can
be sold or repledged of $4,429,821 at June 30, 2009;
$1,870,097 at December 31, 2008) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available for sale (cost: $7,531,537 at June 30, 2009;
$7,656,635 at December 31, 2008) |
|
|
6,963,004 |
|
|
|
6,850,193 |
|
Held to maturity (fair value: $414,173 at June 30, 2009;
$394,752 at December 31, 2008) |
|
|
610,777 |
|
|
|
485,838 |
|
Other (fair value: $581,653 at June 30, 2009;
$583,176 at December 31, 2008) |
|
|
581,653 |
|
|
|
583,176 |
|
|
Total investment securities |
|
|
8,155,434 |
|
|
|
7,919,207 |
|
|
Loans and leases |
|
|
53,075,393 |
|
|
|
49,359,737 |
|
Unearned discount |
|
|
(360,749 |
) |
|
|
(359,274 |
) |
Allowance for credit losses |
|
|
(855,365 |
) |
|
|
(787,904 |
) |
|
Loans and leases, net |
|
|
51,859,279 |
|
|
|
48,212,559 |
|
|
Premises and equipment |
|
|
442,162 |
|
|
|
388,855 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
3,524,625 |
|
|
|
3,192,128 |
|
Core deposit and other intangible assets |
|
|
216,072 |
|
|
|
183,496 |
|
Accrued interest and other assets |
|
|
4,009,643 |
|
|
|
3,633,256 |
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
69,913,217 |
|
|
|
65,815,757 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest-bearing deposits |
|
$ |
12,403,999 |
|
|
|
8,856,114 |
|
NOW accounts |
|
|
1,162,023 |
|
|
|
1,141,308 |
|
Savings deposits |
|
|
22,519,330 |
|
|
|
19,488,918 |
|
Time deposits |
|
|
9,584,351 |
|
|
|
9,046,937 |
|
Deposits at foreign office |
|
|
1,085,004 |
|
|
|
4,047,986 |
|
|
Total deposits |
|
|
46,754,707 |
|
|
|
42,581,263 |
|
|
Federal funds purchased and agreements
to repurchase securities |
|
|
901,422 |
|
|
|
970,529 |
|
Other short-term borrowings |
|
|
2,049,727 |
|
|
|
2,039,206 |
|
Accrued interest and other liabilities |
|
|
1,238,959 |
|
|
|
1,364,879 |
|
Long-term borrowings |
|
|
11,568,238 |
|
|
|
12,075,149 |
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
62,513,053 |
|
|
|
59,031,026 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders
equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, par value $1.00, 1,000,000 shares authorized, 778,000 shares
issued and oustanding at June 30, 2009; 600,000 shares issued and
oustanding at December 31, 2008 (liquidation preference $1,000 per share) |
|
|
725,472 |
|
|
|
567,463 |
|
Common stock, $.50 par, 250,000,000 shares authorized,
120,396,611 shares issued |
|
|
60,198 |
|
|
|
60,198 |
|
Common stock issuable, 73,679 shares at June 30, 2009;
78,447 shares at December 31, 2008 |
|
|
4,244 |
|
|
|
4,617 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
2,448,851 |
|
|
|
2,897,907 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
5,003,551 |
|
|
|
5,062,754 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net |
|
|
(580,756 |
) |
|
|
(736,881 |
) |
Treasury
stock - common, at cost - 2,458,153 shares at
June 30, 2009; 10,031,302 shares at December 31, 2008 |
|
|
(261,396 |
) |
|
|
(1,071,327 |
) |
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
7,400,164 |
|
|
|
6,784,731 |
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
69,913,217 |
|
|
|
65,815,757 |
|
|
- 3 -
M&T BANK CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME (Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended June 30 |
|
Six months ended June 30 |
In thousands, except per share |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
Interest income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans and leases, including fees |
|
$ |
574,234 |
|
|
|
708,083 |
|
|
$ |
1,128,563 |
|
|
|
1,476,474 |
|
Deposits at banks |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
66 |
|
Federal funds sold |
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
137 |
|
Agreements to resell securities |
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
440 |
|
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
1,311 |
|
Trading account |
|
|
194 |
|
|
|
143 |
|
|
|
315 |
|
|
|
402 |
|
Investment securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fully taxable |
|
|
101,133 |
|
|
|
105,809 |
|
|
|
199,600 |
|
|
|
216,854 |
|
Exempt from federal taxes |
|
|
1,814 |
|
|
|
3,025 |
|
|
|
3,343 |
|
|
|
6,492 |
|
|
Total interest income |
|
|
677,423 |
|
|
|
817,574 |
|
|
|
1,331,935 |
|
|
|
1,701,736 |
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOW accounts |
|
|
246 |
|
|
|
629 |
|
|
|
573 |
|
|
|
1,647 |
|
Savings deposits |
|
|
26,362 |
|
|
|
60,317 |
|
|
|
68,284 |
|
|
|
126,939 |
|
Time deposits |
|
|
55,697 |
|
|
|
79,467 |
|
|
|
116,026 |
|
|
|
186,110 |
|
Deposits at foreign office |
|
|
576 |
|
|
|
22,075 |
|
|
|
1,557 |
|
|
|
60,448 |
|
Short-term borrowings |
|
|
2,015 |
|
|
|
42,612 |
|
|
|
4,363 |
|
|
|
104,233 |
|
Long-term borrowings |
|
|
90,960 |
|
|
|
125,842 |
|
|
|
191,758 |
|
|
|
256,877 |
|
|
Total interest expense |
|
|
175,856 |
|
|
|
330,942 |
|
|
|
382,561 |
|
|
|
736,254 |
|
|
Net interest income |
|
|
501,567 |
|
|
|
486,632 |
|
|
|
949,374 |
|
|
|
965,482 |
|
Provision for credit losses |
|
|
147,000 |
|
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
305,000 |
|
|
|
160,000 |
|
|
Net interest income after provision for credit losses |
|
|
354,567 |
|
|
|
386,632 |
|
|
|
644,374 |
|
|
|
805,482 |
|
|
Other income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage banking revenues |
|
|
52,983 |
|
|
|
38,219 |
|
|
|
109,216 |
|
|
|
78,289 |
|
Service charges on deposit accounts |
|
|
112,479 |
|
|
|
110,340 |
|
|
|
213,508 |
|
|
|
213,794 |
|
Trust income |
|
|
32,442 |
|
|
|
40,426 |
|
|
|
67,322 |
|
|
|
80,730 |
|
Brokerage services income |
|
|
13,493 |
|
|
|
17,211 |
|
|
|
28,886 |
|
|
|
32,684 |
|
Trading account and foreign exchange gains |
|
|
7,543 |
|
|
|
6,636 |
|
|
|
8,978 |
|
|
|
11,349 |
|
Gain on bank investment securities |
|
|
292 |
|
|
|
325 |
|
|
|
867 |
|
|
|
33,772 |
|
Total other-than-temporary impairment (OTTI) losses |
|
|
(75,697 |
) |
|
|
(5,746 |
) |
|
|
(138,505 |
) |
|
|
(5,746 |
) |
Portion of OTTI losses recognized in other
comprehensive income (before taxes) |
|
|
50,928 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
81,537 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net OTTI losses recognized in earnings |
|
|
(24,769 |
) |
|
|
(5,746 |
) |
|
|
(56,968 |
) |
|
|
(5,746 |
) |
|
Equity in earnings of Bayview Lending Group LLC |
|
|
(207 |
) |
|
|
(13,026 |
) |
|
|
(4,351 |
) |
|
|
(14,286 |
) |
Other revenues from operations |
|
|
77,393 |
|
|
|
76,797 |
|
|
|
136,532 |
|
|
|
153,259 |
|
|
Total other income |
|
|
271,649 |
|
|
|
271,182 |
|
|
|
503,990 |
|
|
|
583,845 |
|
|
Other expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries and employee benefits |
|
|
249,952 |
|
|
|
236,127 |
|
|
|
499,344 |
|
|
|
487,998 |
|
Equipment and net occupancy |
|
|
51,321 |
|
|
|
47,252 |
|
|
|
99,493 |
|
|
|
94,017 |
|
Printing, postage and supplies |
|
|
11,554 |
|
|
|
9,120 |
|
|
|
20,649 |
|
|
|
19,016 |
|
Amortization of core deposit and other intangible assets |
|
|
15,231 |
|
|
|
16,615 |
|
|
|
30,601 |
|
|
|
35,098 |
|
Deposit insurance |
|
|
49,637 |
|
|
|
1,534 |
|
|
|
55,493 |
|
|
|
3,073 |
|
Other costs of operations |
|
|
186,015 |
|
|
|
109,062 |
|
|
|
296,476 |
|
|
|
206,212 |
|
|
Total other expense |
|
|
563,710 |
|
|
|
419,710 |
|
|
|
1,002,056 |
|
|
|
845,414 |
|
|
Income before taxes |
|
|
62,506 |
|
|
|
238,104 |
|
|
|
146,308 |
|
|
|
543,913 |
|
Income taxes |
|
|
11,318 |
|
|
|
77,839 |
|
|
|
30,899 |
|
|
|
181,452 |
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
51,188 |
|
|
|
160,265 |
|
|
$ |
115,409 |
|
|
|
362,461 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income available to common shareholders |
|
$ |
40,516 |
|
|
|
160,265 |
|
|
$ |
95,105 |
|
|
|
362,461 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per common share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
.36 |
|
|
|
1.45 |
|
|
$ |
.85 |
|
|
|
3.29 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
.36 |
|
|
|
1.44 |
|
|
|
.85 |
|
|
|
3.26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends per common share |
|
$ |
.70 |
|
|
|
.70 |
|
|
$ |
1.40 |
|
|
|
1.40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average common shares outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
113,218 |
|
|
|
110,191 |
|
|
|
111,836 |
|
|
|
110,104 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
113,521 |
|
|
|
111,227 |
|
|
|
111,988 |
|
|
|
111,097 |
|
- 4 -
M&T BANK CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS (Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30 |
In thousands |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
Cash flows from
operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
115,409 |
|
|
|
362,461 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash
provided by operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for credit losses |
|
|
305,000 |
|
|
|
160,000 |
|
Depreciation and amortization of premises
and equipment |
|
|
26,855 |
|
|
|
26,215 |
|
Amortization of capitalized servicing rights |
|
|
31,498 |
|
|
|
32,723 |
|
Amortization of core deposit and other intangible assets |
|
|
30,601 |
|
|
|
35,098 |
|
Provision for deferred income taxes |
|
|
62,472 |
|
|
|
(14,312 |
) |
Asset write-downs |
|
|
80,439 |
|
|
|
6,559 |
|
Net gain on sales of assets |
|
|
(139 |
) |
|
|
(29,608 |
) |
Net change in accrued interest receivable, payable |
|
|
10,408 |
|
|
|
7,808 |
|
Net change in other accrued income and expense |
|
|
38,101 |
|
|
|
(46,326 |
) |
Net change in loans originated for sale |
|
|
(241,186 |
) |
|
|
260,987 |
|
Net change in trading account assets and liabilities |
|
|
(44,953 |
) |
|
|
42,718 |
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
414,505 |
|
|
|
844,323 |
|
|
Cash flows from
investing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sales of investment securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available for sale |
|
|
7,020 |
|
|
|
53,610 |
|
Other |
|
|
42,522 |
|
|
|
38,689 |
|
Proceeds from maturities of investment securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available for sale |
|
|
1,069,602 |
|
|
|
1,251,121 |
|
Held to maturity |
|
|
56,024 |
|
|
|
29,023 |
|
Purchases of investment securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available for sale |
|
|
(33,621 |
) |
|
|
(667,060 |
) |
Held to maturity |
|
|
(19,170 |
) |
|
|
(25,668 |
) |
Other |
|
|
(2,886 |
) |
|
|
(137,684 |
) |
Net (increase) decrease in agreements to resell securities |
|
|
90,000 |
|
|
|
(240,000 |
) |
Net (increase) decrease in loans and leases |
|
|
110,264 |
|
|
|
(2,116,001 |
) |
Other investments, net |
|
|
(14,179 |
) |
|
|
(4,925 |
) |
Additions to capitalized servicing rights |
|
|
(298 |
) |
|
|
(15,744 |
) |
Capital expenditures, net |
|
|
(17,655 |
) |
|
|
(24,196 |
) |
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Banks and bank holding companies |
|
|
144,009 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other, net |
|
|
16,668 |
|
|
|
(43,791 |
) |
|
Net cash provided (used) by investing activities |
|
|
1,448,300 |
|
|
|
(1,902,626 |
) |
|
Cash flows from
financing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in deposits |
|
|
(881,060 |
) |
|
|
663,520 |
|
Net decrease in short-term borrowings |
|
|
(235,111 |
) |
|
|
(2,060,092 |
) |
Proceeds from long-term borrowings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,650,010 |
|
Payments on long-term borrowings |
|
|
(1,001,334 |
) |
|
|
(1,175,977 |
) |
Dividends paid common |
|
|
(160,023 |
) |
|
|
(154,121 |
) |
Dividends paid preferred |
|
|
(11,833 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other, net |
|
|
9,133 |
|
|
|
5,919 |
|
|
Net cash provided (used) by financing activities |
|
|
(2,280,228 |
) |
|
|
929,259 |
|
|
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(417,423 |
) |
|
|
(129,044 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
1,568,151 |
|
|
|
1,767,547 |
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
1,150,728 |
|
|
|
1,638,503 |
|
|
Supplemental
disclosure of cash
flow information |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest received during the period |
|
$ |
1,330,441 |
|
|
|
1,763,523 |
|
Interest paid during the period |
|
|
351,744 |
|
|
|
775,474 |
|
Income taxes paid (refunded) during the period |
|
|
(9,551 |
) |
|
|
186,313 |
|
|
Supplemental
schedule of
noncash investing and
financing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securitization of residential mortgage loans allocated to |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available for sale investment securities |
|
$ |
140,942 |
|
|
|
541,196 |
|
Capitalized servicing rights |
|
|
788 |
|
|
|
4,940 |
|
Real estate acquired in settlement of loans |
|
|
51,143 |
|
|
|
40,314 |
|
Acquisitions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets acquired (noncash) |
|
|
6,171,252 |
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities assumed |
|
|
5,878,941 |
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock issued |
|
|
155,779 |
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock issued |
|
|
272,824 |
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock options |
|
|
1,367 |
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock warrants |
|
|
6,467 |
|
|
|
|
|
- 5 -
M&T BANK CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY (Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common |
|
|
Additional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
comprehensive |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred |
|
|
Common |
|
|
stock |
|
|
paid-in |
|
|
Retained |
|
|
income (loss), |
|
|
Treasury |
|
|
|
|
In thousands, except per share |
|
stock |
|
|
stock |
|
|
issuable |
|
|
capital |
|
|
earnings |
|
|
net |
|
|
stock |
|
|
Total |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance January 1, 2008 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
60,198 |
|
|
|
4,776 |
|
|
|
2,848,752 |
|
|
|
4,815,585 |
|
|
|
(114,822 |
) |
|
|
(1,129,233 |
) |
|
|
6,485,256 |
|
Comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
362,461 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
362,461 |
|
Other comprehensive income,
net of tax and reclassification adjustments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized losses on investment
securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(212,309 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(212,309 |
) |
Defined benefit plans liablity adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(699 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(699 |
) |
Unrealized losses on cash flow hedges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,087 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,087 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
144,366 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repayment of management stock ownership
program receivable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
72 |
|
Stock-based compensation plans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock option and purchase plans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,949 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,944 |
|
|
|
28,893 |
|
Exercises |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19,518 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,346 |
|
|
|
13,828 |
|
Directors stock plan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(223 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
919 |
|
|
|
696 |
|
Deferred compensation plans, net,
including dividend equivalents |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(182 |
) |
|
|
(383 |
) |
|
|
(108 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
739 |
|
|
|
66 |
|
Common stock cash dividends -
$1.40 per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(154,121 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(154,121 |
) |
|
Balance June 30, 2008 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
60,198 |
|
|
|
4,594 |
|
|
|
2,853,649 |
|
|
|
5,023,817 |
|
|
|
(332,917 |
) |
|
|
(1,090,285 |
) |
|
|
6,519,056 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance January 1, 2009 |
|
$ |
567,463 |
|
|
|
60,198 |
|
|
|
4,617 |
|
|
|
2,897,907 |
|
|
|
5,062,754 |
|
|
|
(736,881 |
) |
|
|
(1,071,327 |
) |
|
|
6,784,731 |
|
Comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
115,409 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
115,409 |
|
Other comprehensive income,
net of tax and reclassification adjustments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gains on investment
securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
149,398 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
149,398 |
|
Defined benefit plans liability adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
735 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
735 |
|
Unrealized losses on terminated
cash flow hedges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,992 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,992 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
271,534 |
|
Acquisition of Provident Bankshares Corporation: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock issued |
|
|
155,779 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
155,779 |
|
Common stock issued |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(348,080 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
620,904 |
|
|
|
272,824 |
|
Common stock options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,367 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,367 |
|
Common stock warrants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,467 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,467 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock to defined benefit
pension plan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(51,417 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
95,706 |
|
|
|
44,289 |
|
Preferred stock cash dividends |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,833 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,833 |
) |
Amortization of preferred stock discount |
|
|
2,230 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,230 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation plans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock option and purchase plans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(42,014 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
74,605 |
|
|
|
32,591 |
|
Exercises |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14,097 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,211 |
|
|
|
2,114 |
|
Directors stock plan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(785 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,480 |
|
|
|
695 |
|
Deferred compensation plans, net,
including dividend equivalents |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(373 |
) |
|
|
(497 |
) |
|
|
(101 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,025 |
|
|
|
54 |
|
Common stock cash dividends -
$1.40 per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(160,448 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(160,448 |
) |
|
Balance June 30, 2009 |
|
$ |
725,472 |
|
|
|
60,198 |
|
|
|
4,244 |
|
|
|
2,448,851 |
|
|
|
5,003,551 |
|
|
|
(580,756 |
) |
|
|
(261,396 |
) |
|
|
7,400,164 |
|
|
CONSOLIDATED SUMMARY OF CHANGES IN ALLOWANCE FOR CREDIT LOSSES (Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30 |
|
In thousands |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Beginning balance |
|
$ |
787,904 |
|
|
|
759,439 |
|
Provision for credit losses |
|
|
305,000 |
|
|
|
160,000 |
|
Allowance related to loans sold or securitized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(327 |
) |
Net charge-offs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charge-offs |
|
|
(259,019 |
) |
|
|
(165,404 |
) |
Recoveries |
|
|
21,480 |
|
|
|
20,368 |
|
|
Total net charge-offs |
|
|
(237,539 |
) |
|
|
(145,036 |
) |
|
Ending balance |
|
$ |
855,365 |
|
|
|
774,076 |
|
|
- 6 -
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. Significant accounting policies
The consolidated financial statements of M&T Bank Corporation (M&T) and subsidiaries (the
Company) were compiled in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) using
the accounting policies set forth in note 1 of Notes to Financial Statements included in the 2008
Annual Report, except as described below. In the opinion of management, all adjustments necessary
for a fair presentation have been made and were all of a normal recurring nature. Subsequent
events have been evaluated for their potential impact on the financial statements through August 4,
2009, which is the date the financial statements were issued.
2. Acquisitions
On May 23, 2009, M&T acquired all of the outstanding common stock of Provident Bankshares
Corporation (Provident), a bank holding company based in Baltimore, Maryland, in a
stock-for-stock transaction. Provident Bank, Providents banking subsidiary, was merged into M&T
Bank, M&Ts principal banking subsidiary, on that date. The results of operations acquired in the
Provident transaction have been included in the Companys financial results since May 23, 2009.
Provident common shareholders received .171625 shares of M&T common stock in exchange for each
share of Provident common stock, resulting in M&T issuing a total of 5,838,308 common shares with
an acquisition date fair value of $273 million. In addition, based on the merger agreement,
outstanding and unexercised options to purchase Provident common stock were converted into options
to purchase the common stock of M&T. Those options had an estimated fair value of $1 million. In
total, the purchase price was approximately $274 million based on the fair value on the acquisition
date of M&T common stock exchanged and the options to purchase M&T common stock. Holders of
Providents preferred stock were issued shares of new Series B and Series C Preferred Stock of M&T
having substantially identical terms. That preferred stock and warrants to purchase common stock
associated with the Series C Preferred Stock added $162 million to M&Ts stockholders equity.
The transaction has been accounted for using the acquisition method of accounting and,
accordingly, assets acquired, liabilities assumed and consideration exchanged were recorded at
estimated fair value on the acquisition date. Assets acquired totaled $6.3 billion, including $4.0
billion of loans and leases (including approximately $1.7 billion of commercial real estate loans, $1.4 billion
of consumer loans, $700 million of commercial loans and leases and $300 million of residential real
estate loans) and $1.0 billion of investment securities. Liabilities assumed were $5.9 billion,
including $5.1 billion of deposits. The transaction added $436 million to M&Ts stockholders
equity, including $280 million of common equity and $156 million of preferred equity. In
connection with the acquisition, the Company recorded $332 million of goodwill and $63 million of
core deposit intangible. The core deposit intangible is being amortized over seven years using an
accelerated method. The acquisition of Provident expands the Companys presence in the
Mid-Atlantic area, gives the Company the second largest deposit share in Maryland, and tripled the
Companys presence in Virginia.
In many cases, determining the fair value of the acquired assets and assumed liabilities
required the Company to estimate cash flows expected to result from those assets and liabilities
and to discount those cash flows at appropriate rates of interest. The most significant of these
determinations related to the fair valuation of acquired loans. For such loans, the excess of cash
flows expected at acquisition over the estimated fair value is recognized as interest income over
the remaining lives of the loans. The difference between contractually required payments at
acquisition and the cash flows expected to be collected at acquisition reflects the impact of
estimated credit losses and other
- 7 -
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED
2. Acquisitions, continued
factors, such as prepayments. In accordance with GAAP, there was no carry over of Providents
previously established allowance for credit losses. Subsequent decreases in the expected cash flows
will require the Company to evaluate the need for additions to the Companys allowance for credit
losses. Subsequent improvements in expected cash flows will result in the recognition of
additional interest income over the then remaining lives of the loans.
In conjunction with the Provident acquisition, the acquired loan portfolio was accounted for
at fair value as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 23, 2009 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Contractually required principal
and interest at acquisition |
|
$ |
5,465,167 |
|
Contractual
cash flows not expected to be collected |
|
|
(832,115 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Expected cash flows at acquisition |
|
|
4,633,052 |
|
Interest component of
expected cash flows |
|
|
(595,685 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Basis in acquired loans at
acquisition estimated fair value |
|
$ |
4,037,367 |
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income on acquired loans for the period from date of acquisition to June 30, 2009 was
approximately $19 million. The outstanding principal balance and the carrying amount of these loans that is included in
the consolidated balance sheet at June 30, 2009 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
Outstanding principal balance |
|
$ |
4,269,847 |
|
Carrying amount |
|
|
3,996,718 |
|
Receivables
(including loans and investment securities) obtained in the acquisition of Provident for which there is
specific evidence of credit deterioration and for which it was probable that the Company would be
unable to collect all contractually required principal and interest payments represent less than .25% of the
Companys assets and, accordingly, are not considered material.
In connection with the acquisition of Provident, goodwill of $332 million was calculated after
recording all other acquired assets and liabilities at estimated fair value. In managements
opinion, that goodwill represents the inherent long-term value expected from the business
opportunities and synergies created from combining Provident with the Company.
- 8 -
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED
2. Acquisitions, continued
The consideration paid for Providents common equity and the amounts of acquired identifiable
assets and liabilities and preferred equity assumed as of the acquisition date is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Purchase price: |
|
|
|
|
Value of: |
|
|
|
|
Common shares issued
(5,838,308 shares) |
|
$ |
272,824 |
|
Stock options |
|
|
1,367 |
|
Fractional common
shares paid in cash |
|
|
117 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total purchase price |
|
|
274,308 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Identifiable assets: |
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks |
|
|
144,126 |
|
Investment securities |
|
|
1,039,350 |
|
Loans and leases |
|
|
4,037,367 |
|
Core deposit intangible |
|
|
63,177 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
698,860 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
5,982,880 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and equity: |
|
|
|
|
Deposits |
|
|
5,060,546 |
|
Short-term borrowings |
|
|
176,515 |
|
Long-term borrowings |
|
|
580,740 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
61,022 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
5,878,823 |
|
Preferred stock and common stock warrants |
|
|
162,246 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
6,041,069 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net liabilities and preferred
equity assumed |
|
|
58,189 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill resulting from acquisition |
|
$ |
332,497 |
|
|
|
|
|
None of the goodwill recognized will be deductible for income tax purposes. Changes in
goodwill in the Companys consolidated balance sheet from December 31, 2008 to June 30, 2009 were
attributable to the acquisition of Provident. As described in note 12, the Company does not
allocate goodwill to its reportable segments when compiling the
assets associated with those
segments. The Company does, however, allocate goodwill to segments for purposes of periodically
testing goodwill for impairment. That allocation of goodwill has not yet been completed.
Merger-related expenses associated with the acquisition of Provident were $66 million and $69
million during the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2009, respectively. Such expenses
were for professional services and other temporary help fees associated with the conversion of
systems and/or integration of operations; costs related to branch and office consolidations; costs
related to termination of existing Provident contractual arrangements for various services; initial
marketing and promotion expenses designed to introduce M&T Bank to Providents customers; severance
and incentive compensation costs; travel costs; and printing, supplies and other costs of
commencing operations in new markets and offices. The Company expects to incur additional
merger-related expenses, although such costs are expected to be substantially less than the amount
incurred in the first six months of 2009. As of June 30, 2009, the remaining unpaid portion of
merger-related expenses was $33 million.
- 9 -
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED
2. Acquisitions, continued
A summary of merger-related expenses included in the consolidated statement of income follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Six months ended |
|
|
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Salaries and employee benefits |
|
$ |
8,768 |
|
|
|
8,779 |
|
Equipment and net occupancy |
|
|
581 |
|
|
|
585 |
|
Printing, postage and supplies |
|
|
2,514 |
|
|
|
2,815 |
|
Other costs of operations |
|
|
54,594 |
|
|
|
56,704 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
66,457 |
|
|
|
68,883 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table discloses the impact of Provident (excluding the impact of merger-related
expenses) since the acquisition on May 23, 2009 through the end of the second quarter of 2009. The
table also presents certain pro forma information for 2009 as if Provident had been acquired on
January 1, 2009 and for 2008 as if Provident had been acquired on January 1, 2008. These results
combine the historical results of Provident into the Companys consolidated statement of income
and, while certain adjustments were made for the estimated impact of
certain fair valuation adjustments and
other acquisition-related activity, they are not necessarily indicative of what would have occurred
had the acquisition taken place on the indicated dates. In particular, no adjustments have been
made to eliminate the amount of Providents provision for
credit losses of $42 million in 2009 and $10 million in 2008 or the impact of other-than-temporary impairment losses recognized by Provident
of $87 million in 2009 and $63 million in 2008 that would
not have been necessary had the acquired loans and investment
securities been recorded at fair value as of the beginning of each
year. Furthermore, expenses related to systems conversions and
other costs of integration of $69 million are included in the 2009 periods in which such costs were
incurred. Additionally, the Company expects to achieve further operating cost savings and other
business synergies as a result of the acquisition which are not reflected in the pro forma amounts
presented below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual since |
|
Pro forma |
|
|
acquisition |
|
Six months ended |
|
|
through |
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
|
(in thousands) |
Total revenues |
|
$ |
33,923 |
|
|
|
1,884,980 |
|
|
|
2,451,489 |
|
Net income |
|
|
3,562 |
|
|
|
31,320 |
|
|
|
353,349 |
|
- 10 -
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED
3. Investment securities
The amortized cost and estimated fair value of investment securities were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
unrealized |
|
|
unrealized |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
|
cost |
|
|
gains |
|
|
losses |
|
|
fair value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities available
for sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury and federal agencies |
|
$ |
212,113 |
|
|
|
2,778 |
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
$ |
214,833 |
|
Obligations of states and political
subdivisions |
|
|
64,297 |
|
|
|
1,631 |
|
|
|
189 |
|
|
|
65,739 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Government issued or guaranteed |
|
|
3,755,001 |
|
|
|
115,858 |
|
|
|
3,394 |
|
|
|
3,867,465 |
|
Privately issued residential |
|
|
2,811,913 |
|
|
|
1,797 |
|
|
|
571,952 |
|
|
|
2,241,758 |
|
Privately issued commercial |
|
|
37,124 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,106 |
|
|
|
23,018 |
|
Collateralized debt obligations |
|
|
114,707 |
|
|
|
8,092 |
|
|
|
10,427 |
|
|
|
112,372 |
|
Other debt securities |
|
|
296,835 |
|
|
|
5,442 |
|
|
|
88,889 |
|
|
|
213,388 |
|
Equity securities |
|
|
239,547 |
|
|
|
3,866 |
|
|
|
18,982 |
|
|
|
224,431 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,531,537 |
|
|
|
139,464 |
|
|
|
707,997 |
|
|
|
6,963,004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities held
to maturity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obligations of states and political
subdivisions |
|
|
215,401 |
|
|
|
1,332 |
|
|
|
3,142 |
|
|
|
213,591 |
|
Privately issued residential
mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
383,962 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
194,794 |
|
|
|
189,168 |
|
Other debt securities |
|
|
11,414 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,414 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
610,777 |
|
|
|
1,332 |
|
|
|
197,936 |
|
|
|
414,173 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other securities |
|
|
581,653 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
581,653 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
8,723,967 |
|
|
|
140,796 |
|
|
|
905,933 |
|
|
$ |
7,958,830 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities available
for sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury and federal agencies |
|
$ |
290,893 |
|
|
|
6,203 |
|
|
|
383 |
|
|
$ |
296,713 |
|
Obligations of states and political
subdivisions |
|
|
70,425 |
|
|
|
1,641 |
|
|
|
303 |
|
|
|
71,763 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Government issued or guaranteed |
|
|
3,525,196 |
|
|
|
93,578 |
|
|
|
5,994 |
|
|
|
3,612,780 |
|
Privately issued residential |
|
|
3,104,209 |
|
|
|
484 |
|
|
|
778,139 |
|
|
|
2,326,554 |
|
Privately issued commercial |
|
|
49,231 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,185 |
|
|
|
41,046 |
|
Collateralized debt obligations |
|
|
18,088 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,592 |
|
|
|
2,496 |
|
Other debt securities |
|
|
245,685 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
77,601 |
|
|
|
168,102 |
|
Equity securities |
|
|
352,908 |
|
|
|
581 |
|
|
|
22,750 |
|
|
|
330,739 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,656,635 |
|
|
|
102,505 |
|
|
|
908,947 |
|
|
|
6,850,193 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities held
to maturity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obligations of states and political
subdivisions |
|
|
63,822 |
|
|
|
1,715 |
|
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
65,466 |
|
Privately issued residential
mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
411,847 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
92,730 |
|
|
|
319,117 |
|
Other debt securities |
|
|
10,169 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,169 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
485,838 |
|
|
|
1,715 |
|
|
|
92,801 |
|
|
|
394,752 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other securities |
|
|
583,176 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
583,176 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
8,725,649 |
|
|
|
104,220 |
|
|
|
1,001,748 |
|
|
$ |
7,828,121 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- 11 -
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED
3.
Investment securities, continued
Gross realized gains and losses from sales of investment securities were not significant
during the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2009 and 2008. Effective January 1, 2009,
the Company adopted FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2 Recognition and Presentation of
Other-Than-Temporary Impairments (FSP 115-2). In accordance with FSP 115-2, the Company
recognized $25 million and $57 million of pre-tax other-than-temporary impairment losses during the
three and six months ended June 30, 2009, respectively, related primarily to certain privately
issued residential mortgage-backed securities. The impairment charges were recognized in light of
deterioration of housing values in the residential real estate market and a rise in delinquencies
and charge-offs of underlying mortgage loans collateralizing those securities. Approximately $3
million of impairment charges recognized in the second quarter of 2009 related to two securities
backed by trust preferred securities issued by financial institutions. The other-than-temporary
impairment losses recognized were net of $51 million and $82 million of unrealized losses
classified in accumulated other comprehensive income for the same securities for the three and six
months ended June 30, 2009, respectively. The other-than-temporary impairment losses represent
managements estimate of credit losses inherent in the securities considering projected cash flows
using assumptions of delinquency rates, loss severities, and other estimates of future collateral
performance. Other-than-temporary impairment losses on investment securities of $6 million were
recognized by the Company for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008. The effect of the
adoption of FSP 115-2 on debt securities previously reported as other-than-temporarily impaired was
not material and, therefore, the Company did not record a transition adjustment as of January 1,
2009. Changes in credit losses during the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 associated with
debt securities for which other-than-temporary impairment losses have been previously recognized in
earnings follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt securities |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated credit losses as
of March 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
187,618 |
|
Additions for credit losses
not previously recognized |
|
|
24,769 |
|
Reductions for increases in
cash flows |
|
|
(399 |
) |
Reductions for realized
losses |
|
|
(6,070 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Estimated credit losses as
of June 30, 2009 |
|
$ |
205,918 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated credit losses as
of January 1, 2009 |
|
$ |
155,967 |
|
Additions for credit losses
not previously recognized |
|
|
56,968 |
|
Reductions for increases in
cash flows |
|
|
(947 |
) |
Reductions for realized
losses |
|
|
(6,070 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Estimated credit losses as
of June 30, 2009 |
|
$ |
205,918 |
|
|
|
|
|
- 12 -
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED
3. Investment securities, continued
At June 30, 2009, the amortized cost and estimated fair value of debt securities by
contractual maturity were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
|
cost |
|
|
fair value |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Debt securities available for sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due in one year or less |
|
$ |
172,131 |
|
|
|
173,365 |
|
Due after one year through five years |
|
|
67,468 |
|
|
|
69,510 |
|
Due after five years through ten years |
|
|
35,466 |
|
|
|
36,361 |
|
Due after ten years |
|
|
412,887 |
|
|
|
327,096 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
687,952 |
|
|
|
606,332 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities available
for sale |
|
|
6,604,038 |
|
|
|
6,132,241 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
7,291,990 |
|
|
|
6,738,573 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt securities held to maturity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due in one year or less |
|
$ |
45,673 |
|
|
|
46,038 |
|
Due after one year through five years |
|
|
7,499 |
|
|
|
7,797 |
|
Due after five years through ten years |
|
|
97,999 |
|
|
|
96,943 |
|
Due after ten years |
|
|
75,644 |
|
|
|
74,227 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
226,815 |
|
|
|
225,005 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities held
to maturity |
|
|
383,962 |
|
|
|
189,168 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
610,777 |
|
|
|
414,173 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A summary of investment securities that as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 had been in
a continuous unrealized loss position for less than twelve months and those that had been in a
continuous unrealized loss position for twelve months or longer follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than 12 months |
|
|
12 months or more |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
Fair value |
|
|
losses |
|
|
Fair value |
|
|
losses |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury and federal agencies |
|
$ |
7,866 |
|
|
|
(58 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obligations of states and political
subdivisions |
|
|
157,972 |
|
|
|
(3,110 |
) |
|
|
5,942 |
|
|
|
(221 |
) |
Mortgage-backed securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Government issued or guaranteed |
|
|
534,525 |
|
|
|
(2,711 |
) |
|
|
49,608 |
|
|
|
(683 |
) |
Privately issued residential |
|
|
361,683 |
|
|
|
(198,656 |
) |
|
|
2,007,735 |
|
|
|
(568,090 |
) |
Privately issued commercial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,018 |
|
|
|
(14,106 |
) |
Collateralized debt obligations |
|
|
12,641 |
|
|
|
(1,992 |
) |
|
|
6,286 |
|
|
|
(8,435 |
) |
Other debt securities |
|
|
30,337 |
|
|
|
(3,568 |
) |
|
|
126,184 |
|
|
|
(85,321 |
) |
Equity securities |
|
|
24,795 |
|
|
|
(18,955 |
) |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
(27 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,129,819 |
|
|
|
(229,050 |
) |
|
|
2,218,784 |
|
|
|
(676,883 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury and federal agencies |
|
$ |
6,660 |
|
|
|
(383 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obligations of states and political
subdivisions |
|
|
26,456 |
|
|
|
(315 |
) |
|
|
2,182 |
|
|
|
(59 |
) |
Mortgage-backed securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Government issued or guaranteed |
|
|
392,780 |
|
|
|
(4,962 |
) |
|
|
175,943 |
|
|
|
(1,032 |
) |
Privately issued residential |
|
|
2,173,593 |
|
|
|
(629,321 |
) |
|
|
460,355 |
|
|
|
(241,548 |
) |
Privately issued commercial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,046 |
|
|
|
(8,185 |
) |
Collateralized debt obligations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,221 |
) |
|
|
1,520 |
|
|
|
(13,397 |
) |
Other debt securities |
|
|
102,882 |
|
|
|
(15,563 |
) |
|
|
60,902 |
|
|
|
(62,012 |
) |
Equity securities |
|
|
37,905 |
|
|
|
(22,720 |
) |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
(30 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
2,740,276 |
|
|
|
(675,485 |
) |
|
|
741,957 |
|
|
|
(326,263 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- 13 -
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED
3. Investment securities, continued
The Company owned 1,060 individual investment securities with aggregate gross unrealized
losses of $906 million at June 30, 2009. Approximately $767 million of the unrealized losses
pertain to privately issued residential mortgage-backed securities with a cost basis of
$3.1 billion. The Company also had $95 million of unrealized losses on trust preferred securities
issued by financial institutions and securities backed by trust preferred securities issued by
financial institutions and other entities having a cost basis of $264 million. Based on a review
of each of the securities in the investment securities portfolio at June 30, 2009, with the
exception of the aforementioned securities for which other-than-temporary impairment losses were
recognized, the Company concluded that it expected to recover the amortized cost basis of its
investment. As of June 30, 2009, the Company does not intend to sell nor is it anticipated that it
would be required to sell any of its impaired investment securities. At June 30, 2009, the Company
has not identified events or changes in circumstances which may have a significant adverse effect
on the fair value of the $582 million of cost method investment securities.
4. Borrowings
The Company had $1.2 billion of fixed and floating rate junior subordinated deferrable interest
debentures (Junior Subordinated Debentures) outstanding at June 30, 2009 which are held by
various trusts that were issued in connection with the issuance by those trusts of preferred
capital securities (Capital Securities) and common securities (Common Securities). The
proceeds from the issuances of the Capital Securities and the Common Securities were used by the
trusts to purchase the Junior Subordinated Debentures. The Common Securities of each of those
trusts are wholly owned by M&T and are the only class of each trusts securities possessing general
voting powers. The Capital Securities represent preferred undivided interests in the assets of the
corresponding trust. Under the Federal Reserve Boards current risk-based capital guidelines, the
Capital Securities are includable in M&Ts Tier 1 capital. As a result of the acquisition of
Provident, M&T assumed $133 million of Junior Subordinated Debentures that mature at various dates
from 2028 to 2033.
Holders of the Capital Securities receive preferential cumulative cash distributions unless
M&T exercises its right to extend the payment of interest on the Junior Subordinated Debentures as
allowed by the terms of each such debenture, in which case payment of distributions on the
respective Capital Securities will be deferred for comparable periods. During an extended interest
period, M&T may not pay dividends or distributions on, or repurchase, redeem or acquire any shares
of its capital stock. In the event of an extended interest period exceeding twenty quarterly
periods for $350 million of Junior Subordinated Debentures due January 31, 2068, M&T must fund the
payment of accrued and unpaid interest through an alternative payment mechanism, which requires M&T
to issue common stock, non-cumulative perpetual preferred stock or warrants to purchase common
stock until M&T has raised an amount of eligible proceeds at least equal to the aggregate amount of
accrued and unpaid deferred interest on the Junior Subordinated Debentures due January 31, 2068.
In general, the agreements governing the Capital Securities, in the aggregate, provide a full,
irrevocable and unconditional guarantee by M&T of the payment of distributions on, the redemption
of, and any liquidation distribution with respect to the Capital Securities. The obligations under
such guarantee and the Capital Securities are subordinate and junior in right of payment to all
senior indebtedness of M&T.
- 14 -
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED
4. Borrowings, continued
The Capital Securities will remain outstanding until the Junior Subordinated Debentures are
repaid at maturity, are redeemed prior to maturity or are distributed in liquidation to the Trusts.
The Capital Securities are mandatorily redeemable in whole, but not in part, upon repayment at the
stated maturity dates (ranging from 2027 to 2068) of the Junior Subordinated Debentures or the
earlier redemption of the Junior Subordinated Debentures in whole upon the occurrence of one or
more events set forth in the indentures relating to the Capital Securities, and in whole or in part
at any time after an optional redemption prior to contractual maturity contemporaneously with the
optional redemption of the related Junior Subordinated Debentures in whole or in part, subject to
possible regulatory approval. In connection with the issuance of 8.50% Enhanced Trust Preferred
Securities associated with $350 million of Junior Subordinated Debentures maturing in 2068, M&T
entered into a replacement capital covenant that provides that neither M&T nor any of its
subsidiaries will repay, redeem or purchase any of the Junior Subordinated Debentures due January
31, 2068 or the 8.50% Enhanced Trust Preferred Securities prior to January 31, 2048, with certain
limited exceptions, except to the extent that, during the 180 days prior to the date of that
repayment, redemption or purchase, M&T and its subsidiaries have received proceeds from the sale of
qualifying securities that (i) have equity-like characteristics that are the same as, or more
equity-like than, the applicable characteristics of the 8.50% Enhanced Trust Preferred Securities
or the Junior Subordinated Debentures due January 31, 2068, as applicable, at the time of
repayment, redemption or purchase, and (ii) M&T has obtained the prior approval of the Federal
Reserve Board, if required.
On June 30, 2009, M&T retired $12 million of Junior Subordinated Debentures for which
Provident had been the owner of the related Capital Securities.
Including the unamortized portions of purchase accounting adjustments to reflect estimated
fair value at the acquisition dates of the Common Securities of various trusts and reflecting the
noted cancellation of Junior Subordinated Debentures on June 30, 2009, the Junior Subordinated
Debentures associated with Capital Securities had financial statement carrying values of $1.2
billion and $1.1 billion as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively.
- 15 -
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED
5. Stockholders equity
M&T is authorized to issue 1,000,000 shares of preferred stock with a $1.00 par value per share.
Preferred shares outstanding rank senior to common shares both as to dividends and liquidation
preference, but have no general voting rights.
Issued and outstanding preferred stock of M&T is presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares |
|
Carrying |
|
Carrying |
|
|
issued and |
|
value |
|
value |
|
|
outstanding |
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands) |
Series A (a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed Rate Cumulative Perpetual
Preferred Stock, Series A,
$1,000 liquidation preference
per share, 600,000 shares authorized |
|
|
600,000 |
|
|
$ |
569,693 |
|
|
|
567,463 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series B (b) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series B Mandatory Convertible
Non-cumulative Preferred
Stock, $1,000 liquidation
preference per share, 26,500
shares authorized |
|
|
26,500 |
|
|
|
26,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series C (a)(c) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed Rate Cumulative Perpetual
Preferred Stock, Series C,
$1,000 liquidation preference
per share, 151,500 shares
authorized |
|
|
151,500 |
|
|
|
129,279 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Shares were issued as part of the Troubled Asset Relief Program Capital Purchase Program
of the U.S. Department of Treasury (U.S. Treasury). Cash proceeds were allocated between
the preferred stock and a ten-year warrant to purchase M&T common stock (Series A 1,218,522
shares, Series C 407,542 shares). Dividends, if declared, will accrue and be paid quarterly
at a rate of 5% per year for the first five years following the original 2008 issuance dates
and thereafter at a rate of 9% per year. |
|
(b) |
|
Shares were assumed in the Provident acquisition and a new Series B Preferred Stock was
designated. In the aggregate, the shares of Series B Preferred Stock will automatically
convert into 433,148 shares of M&T common stock on April 1, 2011, but shareholders may elect
to convert their preferred shares at any time prior to that date. Series B Preferred Shares
pay dividends, if declared, at a rate of 10% per year, payable quarterly in arrears. |
|
(c) |
|
Shares were assumed in the Provident acquisition and a new Series C Preferred Stock was
designated. |
- 16 -
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED
6. Pension plans and other postretirement benefits
The Company provides defined benefit pension and other postretirement benefits (including health
care and life insurance benefits) to qualified retired employees. Net periodic defined benefit
cost for defined benefit plans consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
Pension |
|
|
postretirement |
|
|
|
benefits |
|
|
benefits |
|
|
|
Three months ended June 30 |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
4,738 |
|
|
|
4,362 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
115 |
|
Interest cost on projected benefit
obligation |
|
|
11,264 |
|
|
|
10,508 |
|
|
|
747 |
|
|
|
941 |
|
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
(11,576 |
) |
|
|
(11,933 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of prior service cost |
|
|
(1,629 |
) |
|
|
(1,639 |
) |
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
96 |
|
Amortization of net actuarial loss |
|
|
2,499 |
|
|
|
751 |
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
(21 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic benefit cost |
|
$ |
5,296 |
|
|
|
2,049 |
|
|
|
810 |
|
|
|
1,131 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
Pension |
|
|
postretirement |
|
|
|
benefits |
|
|
benefits |
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30 |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
9,613 |
|
|
|
9,705 |
|
|
|
177 |
|
|
|
279 |
|
Interest cost on projected benefit
obligation |
|
|
22,279 |
|
|
|
21,272 |
|
|
|
1,647 |
|
|
|
2,017 |
|
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
(23,051 |
) |
|
|
(23,047 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of prior service cost |
|
|
(3,279 |
) |
|
|
(3,279 |
) |
|
|
121 |
|
|
|
138 |
|
Amortization of net actuarial loss |
|
|
4,849 |
|
|
|
1,971 |
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic benefit cost |
|
$ |
10,411 |
|
|
|
6,622 |
|
|
|
1,935 |
|
|
|
2,455 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expense incurred in connection with the Companys defined contribution pension and retirement
savings plans totaled $8,330,000 and $7,990,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008,
respectively, and $19,105,000 and $18,317,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008,
respectively. The Company is not required to make any minimum contributions to the qualified
defined benefit pension plan in 2009, however, during the second quarter of 2009 the Company
elected to contribute to that plan 900,000 shares of common stock of M&T having a fair value of $44
million.
- 17 -
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED
7. Earnings per common share
The computations of basic earnings per share follow:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Six months ended |
|
|
|
June 30 |
|
|
June 30 |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(in thousands, except per share) |
|
Income available to common
stockholders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
51,188 |
|
|
|
160,265 |
|
|
|
115,409 |
|
|
|
362,461 |
|
Less: Preferred stock dividends |
|
|
(8,468 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15,968 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Amortization of preferred
stock discount |
|
|
(1,756 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,155 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Income attributable to
unvested stock-based
compensation awards |
|
|
(448 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,181 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income available to common
stockholders |
|
$ |
40,516 |
|
|
|
160,265 |
|
|
|
95,105 |
|
|
|
362,461 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average shares
outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares outstanding
(including common stock
issuable) and unvested stock-based compensation awards |
|
|
114,485 |
|
|
|
110,191 |
|
|
|
112,900 |
|
|
|
110,104 |
|
Less: Unvested stock-based
compensation awards |
|
|
(1,267 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,064 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average shares
outstanding |
|
|
113,218 |
|
|
|
110,191 |
|
|
|
111,836 |
|
|
|
110,104 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share |
|
$ |
.36 |
|
|
|
1.45 |
|
|
|
.85 |
|
|
|
3.29 |
|
The computations of diluted earnings per share follow:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Six months ended |
|
|
|
June 30 |
|
|
June 30 |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(in thousands, except per share) |
|
Net income available to
common stockholders |
|
$ |
40,516 |
|
|
|
160,265 |
|
|
|
95,105 |
|
|
|
362,461 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted weighted-average
shares outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common and unvested stock-based
compensation awards |
|
|
114,485 |
|
|
|
110,191 |
|
|
|
112,900 |
|
|
|
110,104 |
|
Less: Unvested stock-based
compensation awards |
|
|
(1,267 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,064 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Plus: Incremental shares from
assumed conversion of stock-based compensation awards and
convertible preferred stock |
|
|
303 |
|
|
|
1,036 |
|
|
|
152 |
|
|
|
993 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted weighted-average
shares outstanding |
|
|
113,521 |
|
|
|
111,227 |
|
|
|
111,988 |
|
|
|
111,097 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share |
|
$ |
.36 |
|
|
|
1.44 |
|
|
|
.85 |
|
|
|
3.26 |
|
- 18 -
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED
7. Earnings per common share, continued
In June 2008, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) specified that, for financial
statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008 and interim periods within
those years, unvested share-based payment awards that contain nonforfeitable rights to dividends or
dividend equivalents (whether paid or unpaid) are participating securities and shall be included in
the computation of earnings per common share pursuant to the two-class method. In 2009, the
Company issued stock-based compensation awards in the form of restricted stock and restricted stock
units, which, according to the FASB, are considered participating securities. Beginning in 2009,
the Companys earnings per common share are calculated using the two-class method. The effects of
the application of the two-class method to previously reported earnings per common share amounts
were immaterial.
Stock-based compensation awards and warrants to purchase common stock of M&T representing
approximately 15.0 million and 9.1 million common shares during the three-month periods ended June
30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, and 15.0 million and 8.9 million common shares during the
six-month periods ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, were not included in the computations
of diluted earnings per common share because the effect on those periods would have been antidilutive.
- 19 -
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED
8. Comprehensive income
The following table displays the components of other comprehensive income (loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
Before-tax |
|
|
Income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
amount |
|
|
taxes |
|
|
Net |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Unrealized gains(losses)
on investment securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available for sale (AFS)
investment securities with OTTI: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities with OTTI charges
during the period |
|
$ |
(138,505 |
) |
|
|
54,250 |
|
|
|
(84,255 |
) |
Less: OTTI charges
recognized in net income |
|
|
(56,968 |
) |
|
|
22,292 |
|
|
|
(34,676 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized losses on
investment securities
with OTTI |
|
|
(81,537 |
) |
|
|
31,958 |
|
|
|
(49,579 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AFS investment securities -
all other: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized holding gains
during period |
|
|
180,862 |
|
|
|
(70,508 |
) |
|
|
110,354 |
|
Less: reclassification
adjustment for losses
realized in net income |
|
|
(79 |
) |
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
(47 |
) |
Less: securities with OTTI
charges during the period |
|
|
(138,505 |
) |
|
|
54,250 |
|
|
|
(84,255 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
319,446 |
|
|
|
(124,790 |
) |
|
|
194,656 |
|
Amortization of unrealized holding
losses to income during period
on investment securities
previously transferred from
AFS to held to maturity |
|
|
5,933 |
|
|
|
(1,612 |
) |
|
|
4,321 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized gains on
investment securities |
|
|
243,842 |
|
|
|
(94,444 |
) |
|
|
149,398 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flow hedges: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reclassification of
losses on terminated cash
flow hedges to income |
|
|
9,830 |
|
|
|
(3,838 |
) |
|
|
5,992 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Defined benefit plans
liability adjustment |
|
|
1,681 |
|
|
|
(946 |
) |
|
|
735 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
255,353 |
|
|
|
(99,228 |
) |
|
|
156,125 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- 20 -
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED
8. Comprehensive income, continued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
Before-tax |
|
|
Income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
amount |
|
|
taxes |
|
|
Net |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Unrealized losses
on AFS investment securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized holding
losses during period |
|
$ |
(302,903 |
) |
|
|
107,664 |
|
|
|
(195,239 |
) |
Less: reclassification
adjustment for gains
realized in net income |
|
|
28,026 |
|
|
|
(10,956 |
) |
|
|
17,070 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(330,929 |
) |
|
|
118,620 |
|
|
|
(212,309 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flow hedges: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized losses
on terminated cash
flow hedges |
|
|
(20,225 |
) |
|
|
7,887 |
|
|
|
(12,338 |
) |
Reclassification of
losses on terminated cash
flow hedges to income |
|
|
11,892 |
|
|
|
(4,641 |
) |
|
|
7,251 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,333 |
) |
|
|
3,246 |
|
|
|
(5,087 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Defined benefit plans
liability adjustment |
|
|
(1,149 |
) |
|
|
450 |
|
|
|
(699 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(340,411 |
) |
|
|
122,316 |
|
|
|
(218,095 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net consisted of unrealized gains (losses) as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash |
|
|
Defined |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities |
|
|
flow |
|
|
benefit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
With OTTI |
|
|
All other |
|
|
hedges |
|
|
plans |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Balance January 1, 2009 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
(556,668 |
) |
|
|
(5,883 |
) |
|
|
(174,330 |
) |
|
|
(736,881 |
) |
|
Net gain (loss) during period |
|
|
(49,579 |
) |
|
|
198,977 |
|
|
|
5,992 |
|
|
|
735 |
|
|
|
156,125 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance June 30, 2009 |
|
$ |
(49,579 |
) |
|
|
(357,691 |
) |
|
|
109 |
|
|
|
(173,595 |
) |
|
|
(580,756 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance January 1, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(59,406 |
) |
|
|
(8,931 |
) |
|
|
(46,485 |
) |
|
|
(114,822 |
) |
|
Net gain (loss) during period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(212,309 |
) |
|
|
(5,087 |
) |
|
|
(699 |
) |
|
|
(218,095 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance June 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(271,715 |
) |
|
|
(14,018 |
) |
|
|
(47,184 |
) |
|
|
(332,917 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- 21 -
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED
9. Derivative financial instruments
As part of managing interest rate risk, the Company enters into interest rate swap agreements to
modify the repricing characteristics of certain portions of the Companys portfolios of earning
assets and interest-bearing liabilities. The Company designates interest rate swap agreements
utilized in the management of interest rate risk as either fair value hedges or cash flow hedges.
Interest rate swap agreements are generally entered into with counterparties that meet established
credit standards and most contain master netting and collateral provisions protecting the at-risk
party. Based on adherence to the Companys credit standards and the presence of the netting and
collateral provisions, the Company believes that the credit risk inherent in these contracts is not
significant as of June 30, 2009.
The net effect of interest rate swap agreements was to increase net interest income by $10
million and $5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, and $17
million and $6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Information
about interest rate swap agreements entered into for interest rate risk management purposes
summarized by type of financial instrument the swap agreements were intended to hedge follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
Notional |
|
|
Average |
|
|
average rate |
|
|
|
amount |
|
|
maturity |
|
|
Fixed |
|
|
Variable |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
(in years) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value hedges: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed rate time deposits (a) |
|
$ |
25,000 |
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
|
5.30 |
% |
|
|
0.58 |
% |
Fixed rate long-term borrowings (a) |
|
|
1,037,241 |
|
|
|
7.0 |
|
|
|
6.33 |
|
|
|
2.59 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,062,241 |
|
|
|
6.9 |
|
|
|
6.30 |
% |
|
|
2.54 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value hedges: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed rate time deposits (a) |
|
$ |
70,000 |
|
|
|
6.1 |
|
|
|
5.14 |
% |
|
|
2.04 |
% |
Fixed rate long-term borrowings (a) |
|
|
1,037,241 |
|
|
|
7.5 |
|
|
|
6.33 |
|
|
|
4.28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,107,241 |
|
|
|
7.4 |
|
|
|
6.25 |
% |
|
|
4.14 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Under the terms of these agreements, the Company receives settlement amounts
at a fixed rate and pays at a variable rate. |
The Company utilizes commitments to sell residential and commercial real estate loans to hedge
the exposure to changes in the fair value of real estate loans held for sale. Such commitments
have generally been designated as fair value hedges. The Company also utilizes commitments to sell
real estate loans to offset the exposure to changes in fair value of certain commitments to
originate real estate loans for sale.
For derivatives designated and qualifying as fair value hedges, the fair values of the
derivatives and changes in the fair values of the hedged items are recorded in the Companys
consolidated balance sheet with the corresponding gain or loss recognized in current earnings. The
difference between changes in the fair values of the interest rate swap agreements and the hedged
items represents hedge ineffectiveness and is recorded in other revenues from operations in the
consolidated statement of income. In a cash flow hedge, the effective portion of the derivatives
unrealized gain or loss is initially recorded as a component of other comprehensive income and
subsequently reclassified into earnings when the forecasted transaction affects earnings. The
ineffective portion of the unrealized gain or loss is reported in other revenues from operations
immediately. The amount of hedge ineffectiveness recognized in the three- and six-month periods
ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 was not material to the Companys results of operations.
- 22 -
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED
9. Derivative financial instruments, continued
Derivative financial instruments used for trading purposes included interest rate contracts,
foreign exchange and other option contracts, foreign exchange forward and spot contracts, and
financial futures. Interest rate contracts entered into for trading purposes had notional values of
$14.9 billion and $14.6 billion at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively.
The notional amounts of foreign currency and other option and futures
contracts entered into for trading purposes aggregated $681 million
and $713 million at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively.
Information about the fair values of derivative instruments in the Companys
consolidated balance sheet and consolidated statement of income follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset derivatives |
|
|
Liability derivatives |
|
|
|
Fair value |
|
|
Fair value |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Derivatives designated and qualifying as hedging instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value hedges: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swap
agreements (a) |
|
$ |
63,618 |
|
|
|
146,111 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments to sell real estate loans (a) |
|
|
7,359 |
|
|
|
1,128 |
|
|
|
1,817 |
|
|
|
13,604 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70,977 |
|
|
|
147,239 |
|
|
|
1,817 |
|
|
|
13,604 |
|
Derivatives not designated and qualifying as hedging instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-related commitments to originate real estate loans for sale (a) |
|
|
10,633 |
|
|
|
11,132 |
|
|
|
957 |
|
|
|
2,988 |
|
Commitments to sell real estate loans (a) |
|
|
9,060 |
|
|
|
5,875 |
|
|
|
4,468 |
|
|
|
8,876 |
|
Trading: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate contracts (b) |
|
|
359,969 |
|
|
|
513,230 |
|
|
|
329,671 |
|
|
|
481,671 |
|
Foreign exchange and other
option and futures contracts (b) |
|
|
24,128 |
|
|
|
38,885 |
|
|
|
23,958 |
|
|
|
39,408 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
403,790 |
|
|
|
569,122 |
|
|
|
359,054 |
|
|
|
532,943 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivatives |
|
$ |
474,767 |
|
|
|
716,361 |
|
|
$ |
360,871 |
|
|
|
546,547 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Asset derivatives are reported in other assets and liability derivatives are reported in
other liabilities. |
|
(b) |
|
Asset derivatives are reported in trading account assets and liability derivatives are
reported in other liabilities. |
- 23 -
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED
9. Derivative financial instruments, continued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of unrealized gain (loss) recognized |
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
|
June 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
Derivative |
|
|
Hedged item |
|
|
Derivative |
|
|
Hedged item |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Derivatives in fair value
hedging relationships |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swap
agreements: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed rate time
deposits (a) |
|
$ |
(942 |
) |
|
|
938 |
|
|
|
(1,896 |
) |
|
|
1,876 |
|
Fixed rate long-term
borrowings (a) |
|
|
(60,402 |
) |
|
|
57,164 |
|
|
|
(47,681 |
) |
|
|
47,140 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
(61,344 |
) |
|
|
58,102 |
|
|
|
(49,577 |
) |
|
|
49,016 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives not designated
as hedging instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate contracts (b) |
|
$ |
(1,186 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,414 |
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange and other option and futures contracts (b) |
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
696 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
(1,130 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,110 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of unrealized gain (loss) recognized |
|
|
|
Six months ended |
|
|
Six months ended |
|
|
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
|
June 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
Derivative |
|
|
Hedged item |
|
|
Derivative |
|
|
Hedged item |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Derivatives in fair value
hedging relationships |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swap
agreements: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed rate time
deposits (a) |
|
$ |
(1,394 |
) |
|
|
1,387 |
|
|
|
(1,425 |
) |
|
|
1,409 |
|
Fixed rate long-term
borrowings (a) |
|
|
(81,717 |
) |
|
|
76,825 |
|
|
|
(23,670 |
) |
|
|
23,055 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
(83,111 |
) |
|
|
78,212 |
|
|
|
(25,095 |
) |
|
|
24,464 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives not designated
as hedging instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate contracts (b) |
|
$ |
(1,357 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,869 |
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange and other option and futures contracts (b) |
|
|
932 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
776 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
(425 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,645 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Reported as other revenues from operations. |
|
(b) |
|
Reported as trading account and foreign exchange gains. |
- 24 -
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED
9. Derivative financial instruments, continued
In addition, the Company also has commitments to sell and commitments to originate residential
and commercial real estate loans, which are considered derivatives. The Company designates certain
of the commitments to sell real estate loans as fair value hedges of real estate loans held for
sale. Changes in unrealized gains and losses are included in mortgage banking
revenues and, in general, are realized in subsequent periods as the related loans are sold and
commitments satisfied.
For the three months ended June 30, 2009, net unrealized pre-tax gains of $26,546,000
related to commitments to sell real estate loans, net unrealized pre-tax losses of $12,361,000
related to commitments to originate real estate loans and net unrealized pre-tax losses of
$13,367,000 related to hedged real estate loans held for sale were recognized in the consolidated
statement of income. For the three months ended June 30, 2008, net unrealized pre-tax gains of
$10,553,000 related to commitments to sell real estate loans, net unrealized pre-tax losses of
$4,009,000 related to commitments to originate real estate loans and net unrealized pre-tax losses
of $11,592,000 related to hedged real estate loans held for sale were recognized in the
consolidated statement of income. For the six months ended June 30, 2009, net unrealized pre-tax
gains of $25,611,000 related to commitments to sell real estate loans, net unrealized pre-tax gains
of $1,410,000 related to commitments to originate real estate loans and net unrealized pre-tax
losses of $11,610,000 related to hedged real estate loans held for sale were recognized in the
consolidated statement of income. For the six months ended June 30, 2008, net unrealized pre-tax
gains of $6,925,000 related to commitments to sell real estate loans, net unrealized pre-tax gains
of $882,000 related to commitments to originate real estate loans and net unrealized pre-tax losses
of $7,654,000 related to hedged real estate loans held for sale were recognized in the consolidated
statement of income.
The aggregate fair value of derivative financial instruments in a net liability position at
June 30, 2009 for which the Company was required to post collateral was $257 million. The fair
value of collateral posted for such instruments was $251 million.
10. Fair value measurements
Pursuant to GAAP, fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or
paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the
measurement date. A three-level hierarchy exists in GAAP for fair value measurements based upon the
inputs to the valuation of an asset or liability.
|
|
|
Level 1 Valuation is based on quoted prices in active markets for identical
assets and liabilities. |
|
|
|
|
Level 2 Valuation is determined from quoted prices for similar assets or
liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in
markets that are not active or by model-based techniques in which all significant inputs
are observable in the market. |
|
|
|
|
Level 3 Valuation is derived from model-based and other techniques in which
at least one significant input is unobservable and which may be based on the Companys own
estimates about the assumptions that market participants would use to value the asset or
liability. |
- 25 -
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED
10. Fair value measurements, continued
When available, the Company attempts to use quoted market prices in active markets to
determine fair value and classifies such items as Level 1 or Level 2. If quoted market prices in
active markets are not available, fair value is often determined using model-based techniques
incorporating various assumptions including interest rates, prepayment speeds and credit losses.
Assets and liabilities valued using model-based techniques are classified as either Level 2 or
Level 3, depending on the lowest level classification of an input that is considered significant to
the overall valuation. The following is a description of the valuation methodologies used for the
Companys assets and liabilities that are measured on a recurring basis at estimated fair value.
Trading account assets and liabilities
Trading account assets and liabilities consist primarily of interest rate swap agreements and
foreign exchange contracts with customers who require such services with offsetting trading
positions with third parties to minimize the Companys risk with respect to such transactions. The
Company generally determines the fair value of its derivative trading account assets and
liabilities using externally developed pricing models based on market observable inputs and
therefore classifies such valuations as Level 2. Prices for certain foreign exchange contracts are
more observable and therefore have been classified as Level 1. Mutual funds held in connection with
deferred compensation arrangements have also been classified as Level 1 valuations. Valuations of
investments in municipal and other bonds can generally be obtained through reference to quoted
prices in less active markets for the same or similar securities or through model-based techniques
in which all significant inputs are observable and, therefore, such valuations have been classified
as Level 2.
Investment securities available for sale
The majority of the Companys available-for-sale investment securities have been valued by
reference to prices for similar securities or through model-based techniques in which all
significant inputs are observable and, therefore, such valuations have been classified as Level 2.
Certain investments in mutual funds and equity securities are actively traded and therefore have
been classified as Level 1 valuations.
Due to the severe disruption in the credit markets during the second half of 2008 and
continuing into 2009, trading activity in privately issued mortgage-backed securities was very
limited. The markets for such securities were generally characterized by a sharp reduction of
non-agency mortgage-backed securities issuances, a significant reduction in trading volumes and
extremely wide bid-ask spreads, all driven by the lack of market participants. Although estimated
prices were generally obtained for such securities, the Company was significantly restricted in the
level of market observable assumptions used in the valuation of its privately issued
mortgage-backed securities portfolio. Specifically, market assumptions regarding credit adjusted
cash flows and liquidity influences on discount rates were difficult to observe at the individual
bond level. Because of the inactivity in the markets and the lack of observable valuation inputs,
the Company has classified the valuation of privately issued mortgage-backed securities as Level 3.
In April 2009, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. 157-4, Determining Fair Value When the
Volume and Level of Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and
Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly (FSP 157-4). FSP 157-4 provided guidance for
estimating fair value when the volume and level of trading activity for an asset or liability have
significantly decreased. The Company has concluded that there has been a significant decline in
the volume and level of activity in the market for privately issued mortgage-backed
securities. As a result, the Company supplemented its determination of
- 26 -
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED
10. Fair value measurements, continued
fair value for many of its privately issued mortgage-backed
securities by obtaining pricing indications from two independent sources at June 30, 2009. The
Company further ascertained that many of the recently observable trades in the market for privately
issued residential mortgage-backed securities could not be determined to be orderly. As a result,
the Company also performed internal modeling to estimate the cash flows and fair value of 149 of
its privately issued residential mortgage-backed securities with an amortized cost basis of $2.2
billion at June 30, 2009. The Companys internal modeling techniques included discounting
estimated bond-specific cash flows using assumptions about cash flows associated with loans
underlying each of the bonds, including estimates about the timing and amount of credit losses and
prepayments. In estimating those cash flows, the Company used conservative assumptions as to
future delinquency, defaults and loss rates, including assumptions for further home price
depreciation. Differences between internal model valuations and external pricing indications were
generally considered to be reflective of the lack of liquidity in the market for privately issued
mortgage-backed securities given the conservative nature of the cash flow modeling performed in the
Companys assessment of value. To determine the point within the range of potential values that
was most representative of fair value under current market conditions for each of the 149 bonds,
the Company computed values based on judgmentally applied weightings of the internal model
valuations and the indications obtained from the average of the two independent pricing sources.
Weightings applied to internal model valuations generally ranged from zero to 40% depending on bond
structure and collateral type, with prices for bonds in non-senior tranches generally receiving
lower weightings on the internal model results and senior bonds receiving a higher model weighting.
Weighted-average reliance on internal model pricing for the bonds modeled was 36% with a 64%
average weighting placed on the values provided by the independent sources. The Company concluded
its estimate of fair value for the $2.2 billion of privately issued residential mortgage-backed
securities to approximate $1.7 billion, which implies a weighted-average market yield based on
reasonably likely cash flows of 12%. Other valuations of privately issued residential
mortgage-backed securities with an amortized cost basis of $613 million and fair value of $543
million, primarily comprised of retained securities from two non-recourse securitization
transactions executed by the Company in 2002 and 2003, and other privately issued commercial
mortgage-backed securities with an amortized cost basis of $37 million and a fair value of $23
million were determined by reference to independent pricing sources without adjustment.
Included in other debt securities are securities backed by trust preferred securities issued
by financial institutions and other entities. Given the severe disruption in the credit markets
and lack of observable trade information, the Company could not obtain pricing indications for many
of these securities from its two primary independent pricing sources. The Company, therefore,
performed internal modeling to estimate the cash flows and fair value of its portfolio of
securities backed by trust preferred securities at June 30, 2009. The modeling techniques included
discounting estimated cash flows using bond-specific assumptions about defaults, deferrals and
prepayments of the trust preferred securities underlying each bond. The estimation of cash flows
included conservative assumptions as to the future collateral defaults and the related loss
severities. The resulting cash flows were then discounted by reference to market yields observed
in the single-name trust preferred securities market. At June 30, 2009, both the total amortized
cost and fair value of securities backed by trust preferred securities issued by financial
institutions and other entities was $112 million. Privately issued mortgage-backed securities and
securities backed by trust preferred securities issued by financial institutions and other entities
constituted substantially all of the available for sale investment securities classified as Level 3
valuations as of June 30, 2009.
- 27 -
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED
10. Fair value measurements, continued
Real estate loans held for sale
The Company utilizes commitments to sell real estate loans to hedge the exposure to changes in fair
value of real estate loans held for sale. The carrying value of hedged real estate loans held for
sale includes changes in estimated fair value during the hedge period. Typically, the Company
attempts to hedge real estate loans held for sale from the date of close through the sale date.
The fair value of hedged real estate loans held for sale is generally calculated by reference to
quoted prices in secondary markets for commitments to sell real estate loans with similar
characteristics and, as such, have been classified as a Level 2 valuation.
Commitments to originate real estate loans for sale and commitments to sell real estate loans
The Company enters into various commitments to originate real estate loans for sale and commitments
to sell real estate loans. Such commitments are considered to be derivative financial instruments
and, therefore, are carried at estimated fair value on the consolidated balance sheet. The
estimated fair values of such commitments were generally calculated by reference to quoted prices
in secondary markets for commitments to sell real estate loans to certain government-sponsored
entities and other parties. The fair valuations of commitments to sell real estate loans generally
result in a Level 2 classification. The estimated fair value of commitments to originate real
estate loans for sale are adjusted to reflect the Companys anticipated commitment expirations.
Estimated commitment expirations are considered a significant unobservable input, which results in
a Level 3 classification. The Company includes the expected net future cash flows related to the
associated servicing of the loan in the fair value measurement of a derivative loan commitment.
The estimated value ascribed to the expected net future servicing cash flows is also considered a
significant unobservable input contributing to the Level 3 classification of commitments to
originate real estate loans for sale.
Interest rate swap agreements used for interest rate risk management
The Company utilizes interest rate swap agreements as part of the management of interest rate risk
to modify the repricing characteristics of certain portions of its portfolios of earning assets and
interest-bearing liabilities. The Company generally determines the fair value of its interest rate
swap agreements using externally developed pricing models based on market observable inputs and
therefore classifies such valuations as Level 2. The Company has considered counterparty credit
risk in the valuation of its interest rate swap assets and has considered its own credit risk in
the valuation of its interest rate swap liabilities.
- 28 -
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED
10. Fair value measurements, continued
The following tables present assets and liabilities at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008
measured at estimated fair value on a recurring basis:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
measurements at |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Trading account assets |
|
$ |
495,324 |
|
|
|
41,869 |
|
|
|
453,455 |
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities
available for sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury and
federal agencies |
|
|
214,833 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
214,833 |
|
|
|
|
|
Obligations of states
and political subdivisions |
|
|
65,739 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53,536 |
|
|
|
12,203 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Government issued or
guaranteed |
|
|
3,867,465 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,867,465 |
|
|
|
|
|
Privately issued
residential |
|
|
2,241,758 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,241,758 |
|
Privately issued
commercial |
|
|
23,018 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,018 |
|
Collateralized debt
obligations |
|
|
112,372 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
112,372 |
|
Other debt securities |
|
|
213,388 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
212,623 |
|
|
|
765 |
|
Equity securities |
|
|
224,431 |
|
|
|
197,351 |
|
|
|
24,751 |
|
|
|
2,329 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,963,004 |
|
|
|
197,351 |
|
|
|
4,373,208 |
|
|
|
2,392,445 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate loans
held for sale |
|
|
800,995 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
800,995 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets(a) |
|
|
90,700 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80,067 |
|
|
|
10,633 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
8,350,023 |
|
|
|
239,220 |
|
|
|
5,707,725 |
|
|
|
2,403,078 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading account
liabilities |
|
$ |
353,629 |
|
|
|
10,886 |
|
|
|
342,743 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities(a) |
|
|
7,242 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,285 |
|
|
|
957 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
$ |
360,871 |
|
|
|
10,886 |
|
|
|
349,028 |
|
|
|
957 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- 29 -
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED
10. Fair value measurements, continued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
measurements at |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Trading account assets |
|
$ |
617,821 |
|
|
|
46,142 |
|
|
|
571,679 |
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities
available for sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury and
federal agencies |
|
|
296,713 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
291,181 |
|
|
|
5,532 |
|
Obligations of states
and political subdivisions |
|
|
71,763 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71,725 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Government issued or
guaranteed |
|
|
3,612,780 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,528,236 |
|
|
|
84,544 |
|
Privately issued
residential |
|
|
2,326,554 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,326,554 |
|
Privately issued
commercial |
|
|
41,046 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,046 |
|
Collateralized debt
obligations |
|
|
2,496 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,496 |
|
Other debt securities |
|
|
168,102 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
168,102 |
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securities |
|
|
330,739 |
|
|
|
297,231 |
|
|
|
31,206 |
|
|
|
2,302 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,850,193 |
|
|
|
297,231 |
|
|
|
4,090,450 |
|
|
|
2,462,512 |
|
Real estate loans
held for sale |
|
|
507,971 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
507,971 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets(a) |
|
|
164,433 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
153,179 |
|
|
|
11,254 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
8,140,418 |
|
|
|
343,373 |
|
|
|
5,323,279 |
|
|
|
2,473,766 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading account
liabilities |
|
$ |
521,079 |
|
|
|
14,193 |
|
|
|
506,886 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities(a) |
|
|
25,468 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,480 |
|
|
|
2,988 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
$ |
546,547 |
|
|
|
14,193 |
|
|
|
529,366 |
|
|
|
2,988 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Comprised predominantly of interest rate swap agreements used for interest rate risk
management (Level 2), commitments to sell real estate loans (Level 2) and commitments to
originate real estate loans to be held for sale (Level 3). |
- 30 -
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED
10. Fair value measurements, continued
The changes in Level 3 assets and liabilities measured at estimated fair value on a
recurring basis during the three months ended June 30, 2009 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
gains (losses) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
included in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gains (losses) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
realized/unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
related to |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in |
|
|
Purchases, |
|
|
Transfer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
assets still |
|
|
|
Balance- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
other |
|
|
sales, |
|
|
in and/or |
|
|
Balance- |
|
|
held at |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
Included |
|
|
comprehensive |
|
|
issuances & |
|
|
out of |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
in earnings |
|
|
income |
|
|
settlements |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Investment securities available for sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury
and federal
agencies |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obligations of
states and
political
subdivisions |
|
|
12,182 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,203 |
|
|
|
|
|
Government
issued or guaranteed
mortgage-
backed
securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Privately
issued
residential
mortgage-
backed
securities |
|
|
2,349,403 |
|
|
|
(22,269 |
)(a) |
|
|
37,622 |
|
|
|
(122,998 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,241,758 |
|
|
|
(22,269 |
)(a) |
Privately
issued
commercial
mortgage-
backed
securities |
|
|
32,215 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,739 |
) |
|
|
(3,458 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,018 |
|
|
|
|
|
Collateralized debt obligations |
|
|
2,421 |
|
|
|
(2,101 |
)(a) |
|
|
13,787 |
|
|
|
98,265 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
112,372 |
|
|
|
(2,101 |
)(a) |
Other debt securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
725 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
765 |
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securities |
|
|
2,343 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,329 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,398,564 |
|
|
|
(24,370 |
) |
|
|
45,732 |
|
|
|
(27,481 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,392,445 |
|
|
|
(24,370 |
) |
Other assets
and other
liabilities |
|
|
22,037 |
|
|
|
(7,768 |
)(b) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,593 |
) |
|
|
9,676 |
|
|
|
7,946 |
(b) |
- 31 -
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED
10. Fair value measurements, continued
The changes in Level 3 assets and liabilities measured at estimated fair value on a recurring
basis during the three months ended June 30, 2008 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
gains |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(losses) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
included in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gains (losses) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
realized/unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transfer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
related to |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in |
|
|
Purchases, |
|
|
in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
assets still |
|
|
|
Balance- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
other |
|
|
sales, |
|
|
and/or |
|
|
Balance- |
|
|
held at |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
Included |
|
|
comprehensive |
|
|
issuances & |
|
|
out of |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
in earnings |
|
|
income |
|
|
settlements |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Investment securities available for sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury and federal agencies |
|
$ |
5,688 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(152 |
) |
|
|
(169 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,367 |
|
|
|
|
|
Obligations of states and political
subdivisions |
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
|
|
Government issued or guaranteed
mortgage- backed securities |
|
|
90,096 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,092 |
) |
|
|
67 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
89,071 |
|
|
|
|
|
Privately issued residential and
commercial mortgage- backed securities |
|
|
1,055,017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(21,587 |
) |
|
|
(52,193 |
) |
|
|
(85,219 |
) |
|
|
896,018 |
|
|
|
|
|
Collateralized debt obligations |
|
|
19,630 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,148 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,482 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other debt securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securities |
|
|
2,322 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,329 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,172,801 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(27,981 |
) |
|
|
(52,287 |
) |
|
|
(85,219 |
) |
|
|
1,007,314 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets and other liabilities |
|
|
8,128 |
|
|
|
2,242 |
(b) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,251 |
) |
|
|
4,119 |
|
|
|
3,596 |
(b) |
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Reported as an other-than-temporary impairment loss in the consolidated statement of income. |
|
(b) |
|
Reported as mortgage banking revenues in the consolidated statement of income and includes
the fair value of commitment issuances and expirations. |
- 32 -
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED
10. Fair value measurements, continued
The changes in Level 3 assets and liabilities measured at estimated fair value on a
recurring basis during the six months ended June 30, 2009 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
gains (losses) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
included in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gains (losses) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
realized/unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
related to |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in |
|
|
Purchases, |
|
|
Transfer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
assets still |
|
|
|
Balance- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
other |
|
|
sales, |
|
|
in and/or |
|
|
Balance- |
|
|
held at |
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
Included |
|
|
comprehensive |
|
|
issuances & |
|
|
out of |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
in earnings |
|
|
income |
|
|
settlements |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Investment securities available for sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury and federal agencies |
|
$ |
5,532 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,532 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obligations of states and political
subdivisions |
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,143 |
|
|
|
12,203 |
|
|
|
|
|
Government issued or guaranteed
mortgage- backed
securities |
|
|
84,544 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(84,544 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Privately issued residential mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
2,326,554 |
|
|
|
(54,468 |
)(a) |
|
|
215,127 |
|
|
|
(245,455 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,241,758 |
|
|
|
(54,468 |
)(a) |
Privately issued commercial mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
41,046 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,001 |
) |
|
|
(9,027 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,018 |
|
|
|
|
|
Collateralized debt obligations |
|
|
2,496 |
|
|
|
(1,553 |
)(a) |
|
|
13,712 |
|
|
|
97,717 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
112,372 |
|
|
|
(1,553 |
)(a) |
Other debt securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
725 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
765 |
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securities |
|
|
2,302 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,329 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,462,512 |
|
|
|
(56,021 |
) |
|
|
219,901 |
|
|
|
(156,014 |
) |
|
|
(77,933 |
) |
|
|
2,392,445 |
|
|
|
(56,021 |
) |
Other assets and other liabilities |
|
|
8,266 |
|
|
|
19,490 |
(b) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18,080 |
) |
|
|
9,676 |
|
|
|
12,046 |
(b) |
- 33 -
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED
10. Fair value measurements, continued
The changes in Level 3 assets and liabilities measured at estimated fair value on a recurring
basis during the six months ended June 30, 2008 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
gains |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(losses) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
included in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gains (losses) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
realized/unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
related to |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in |
|
|
Purchases, |
|
|
Transfer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
assets still |
|
|
|
Balance- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
other |
|
|
sales, |
|
|
in and/or |
|
|
Balance- |
|
|
held at |
|
|
|
January 1, |
|
|
Included |
|
|
comprehensive |
|
|
issuances & |
|
|
out of |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
in earnings |
|
|
income |
|
|
settlements |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Investment securities available for sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury and federal agencies |
|
$ |
5,696 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20 |
) |
|
|
(309 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,367 |
|
|
|
|
|
Obligations of states and political subdivisions |
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
|
|
Government issued or guaranteed mortgage-
backed securities |
|
|
118,992 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
806 |
|
|
|
(1,791 |
) |
|
|
(28,936 |
) |
|
|
89,071 |
|
|
|
|
|
Privately issued residential and commercial
mortgage- backed securities |
|
|
1,159,644 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(77,638 |
) |
|
|
(100,769 |
) |
|
|
(85,219 |
) |
|
|
896,018 |
|
|
|
|
|
Collateralized debt obligations |
|
|
27,115 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,633 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,482 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other debt securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securities |
|
|
2,324 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,329 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,313,821 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(89,492 |
) |
|
|
(102,860 |
) |
|
|
(114,155 |
) |
|
|
1,007,314 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets and other liabilities |
|
|
2,654 |
|
|
|
14,962 |
(b) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13,497 |
) |
|
|
4,119 |
|
|
|
4,119 |
(b) |
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Reported as an other-than-temporary impairment loss in the consolidated statement of
income. |
|
(b) |
|
Reported as mortgage banking revenues in the consolidated statement of income and includes
the fair value of commitment issuances and expirations. |
- 34 -
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED
10. Fair value measurements, continued
The Company is required, on a nonrecurring basis, to adjust the carrying value of certain
assets or provide valuation allowances related to certain assets using fair value measurements.
Loans
Loans are generally not recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. Periodically, the Company
records nonrecurring adjustments to the carrying value of loans based on fair value measurements
for partial charge-offs of the uncollectible portions of those loans. Nonrecurring adjustments also
include certain impairment amounts for collateral-dependent loans when establishing the allowance
for credit losses. Such amounts are generally based on the fair value of the underlying collateral
supporting the loan and, as a result, the carrying value of the loan less the calculated valuation
amount does not necessarily represent the fair value of the loan. Real estate collateral is
typically valued using appraisals or other indications of value based on recent comparable sales of
similar properties or assumptions generally observable in the marketplace and the related
nonrecurring fair value measurement adjustments have generally been classified as Level 2, unless
significant adjustments have been made to the valuation that are not readily observable by market
participants. Estimates of fair value used for other collateral supporting commercial loans
generally are based on assumptions not observable in the marketplace and therefore such valuations
have been classified as Level 3. Loans subject to nonrecurring fair value measurement were $632
million at June 30, 2009, ($303 million and $329 million of which were classified as Level 2 and
Level 3, respectively) and $288 million at June 30, 2008 ($214 million and $74 million of which
were classified as Level 2 and Level 3, respectively). Changes in fair value recognized for
partial charge-offs of loans and loan impairment reserves on loans held by the Company on June 30,
2009 were decreases of $157 million and $238 million for the three and six months ended June 30,
2009, respectively, and on loans held by the Company on June 30, 2008 were decreases of $71 million
and $88 million for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2008, respectively.
Capitalized servicing rights
Capitalized servicing rights are initially measured at fair value in the Companys
consolidated balance sheet. The Company utilizes the amortization method to subsequently measure
its capitalized servicing assets. In accordance with GAAP, the Company must record impairment
charges, on a nonrecurring basis, when the carrying value of certain strata exceed their estimated
fair value. To estimate the fair value of servicing rights, the Company considers market prices for
similar assets, if available, and the present value of expected future cash flows associated with
the servicing rights calculated using assumptions that market participants would use in estimating
future servicing income and expense. Such assumptions include estimates of the cost of servicing
loans, loan default rates, an appropriate discount rate, and prepayment speeds. For purposes of
evaluating and measuring impairment of capitalized servicing rights, the Company stratifies such
assets based on the predominant risk characteristics of the underlying financial instruments that
are expected to have the most impact on projected prepayments, cost of servicing and other factors
affecting future cash flows associated with the servicing rights. Such factors may include
financial asset or loan type, note rate and term. The amount of impairment recognized is the amount
by which the carrying value of the capitalized servicing rights for a stratum exceed estimated fair
value. Impairment is recognized through a valuation allowance. The determination of fair value of
capitalized servicing rights is considered a Level 3 valuation. At June 30, 2009, $30 million of
capitalized servicing rights had a carrying value equal to their fair value. Changes in fair value
of capitalized servicing rights recognized for the three and six
months ended June 30, 2009 were increases of $13 million and $18 million,
- 35 -
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED
10. Fair value measurements, continued
respectively. At June 30, 2008, $20 million of capitalized servicing rights had a carrying value
equal to their fair value. Changes in fair value of capitalized servicing rights recognized for
the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 were increases of $9 million and $5 million,
respectively.
Assets taken in foreclosure of defaulted loans
Assets taken in foreclosure of defaulted loans are primarily comprised of commercial and
residential real property and are generally measured at the lower of cost or fair value less costs
to sell. The fair value of the real property is generally determined using appraisals or other
indications of value based on recent comparable sales of similar properties or assumptions
generally observable in the marketplace, and the related nonrecurring fair value measurement
adjustments have generally been classified as Level 2. Assets taken in foreclosure of defaulted
loans subject to nonrecurring fair value measurement were $21 million at June 30, 2009. Changes in
fair value recognized for those foreclosed assets held by the Company
at June 30, 2009 were $21
million and $22 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, respectively.
- 36 -
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED
10. Fair value measurements, continued
Disclosures of fair value of financial instruments
With the exception of marketable securities, certain off-balance sheet financial instruments and
one-to-four family residential mortgage loans originated for sale, the Companys financial
instruments are not readily marketable and market prices do not exist. The Company, in attempting
to comply with the provisions of GAAP that require disclosures of fair value of financial
instruments, has not attempted to market its financial instruments to potential buyers, if any
exist. Since negotiated prices in illiquid markets depend greatly upon the then present motivations
of the buyer and seller, it is reasonable to assume that actual sales prices could vary widely from
any estimate of fair value made without the benefit of negotiations. Additionally, changes in
market interest rates can dramatically impact the value of financial instruments in a short period
of time. Additional information about the assumptions and calculations utilized is presented below.
The carrying amounts and estimated fair value for financial instrument assets (liabilities)
are presented in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Calculated |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Calculated |
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Estimate |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Estimate |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Financial assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
1,150,728 |
|
|
$ |
1,150,728 |
|
|
$ |
1,568,151 |
|
|
$ |
1,568,151 |
|
Interest-bearing deposits at banks |
|
|
59,950 |
|
|
|
59,950 |
|
|
|
10,284 |
|
|
|
10,284 |
|
Trading account assets |
|
|
495,324 |
|
|
|
495,324 |
|
|
|
617,821 |
|
|
|
617,821 |
|
Agreements to resell securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90,000 |
|
|
|
90,000 |
|
Investment securities |
|
|
8,155,434 |
|
|
|
7,958,830 |
|
|
|
7,919,207 |
|
|
|
7,828,121 |
|
Loans and leases: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial loans and leases |
|
|
14,180,609 |
|
|
|
13,744,572 |
|
|
|
14,261,882 |
|
|
|
14,137,805 |
|
Commercial real estate loans |
|
|
20,787,198 |
|
|
|
20,098,344 |
|
|
|
18,837,665 |
|
|
|
18,210,209 |
|
Residential real estate loans |
|
|
5,471,775 |
|
|
|
4,838,466 |
|
|
|
4,904,424 |
|
|
|
4,249,137 |
|
Consumer loans |
|
|
12,275,062 |
|
|
|
11,936,555 |
|
|
|
10,996,492 |
|
|
|
10,849,635 |
|
Allowance for credit losses |
|
|
(855,365 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(787,904 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans and leases, net |
|
|
51,859,279 |
|
|
|
50,617,937 |
|
|
|
48,212,559 |
|
|
|
47,446,786 |
|
Accrued interest receivable |
|
|
219,164 |
|
|
|
219,164 |
|
|
|
222,073 |
|
|
|
222,073 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest-bearing deposits |
|
$ |
(12,403,999 |
) |
|
$ |
(12,403,999 |
) |
|
$ |
(8,856,114 |
) |
|
$ |
(8,856,114 |
) |
Savings deposits and NOW accounts |
|
|
(23,681,353 |
) |
|
|
(23,681,353 |
) |
|
|
(20,630,226 |
) |
|
|
(20,630,226 |
) |
Time deposits |
|
|
(9,584,351 |
) |
|
|
(9,666,248 |
) |
|
|
(9,046,937 |
) |
|
|
(9,108,821 |
) |
Deposits at foreign office |
|
|
(1,085,004 |
) |
|
|
(1,085,004 |
) |
|
|
(4,047,986 |
) |
|
|
(4,047,986 |
) |
Short-term borrowings |
|
|
(2,951,149 |
) |
|
|
(2,951,149 |
) |
|
|
(3,009,735 |
) |
|
|
(3,009,735 |
) |
Long-term borrowings |
|
|
(11,568,238 |
) |
|
|
(10,714,115 |
) |
|
|
(12,075,149 |
) |
|
|
(11,104,337 |
) |
Accrued interest payable |
|
|
(148,270 |
) |
|
|
(148,270 |
) |
|
|
(142,456 |
) |
|
|
(142,456 |
) |
Trading account liabilities |
|
|
(353,629 |
) |
|
|
(353,629 |
) |
|
|
(521,079 |
) |
|
|
(521,079 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other financial instruments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments to originate real estate
loans for sale |
|
$ |
9,676 |
|
|
$ |
9,676 |
|
|
$ |
8,144 |
|
|
$ |
8,144 |
|
Commitments to sell real estate loans |
|
|
10,134 |
|
|
|
10,134 |
|
|
|
(15,477 |
) |
|
|
(15,477 |
) |
Other credit-related commitments |
|
|
(51,030 |
) |
|
|
(51,030 |
) |
|
|
(51,361 |
) |
|
|
(51,361 |
) |
Interest rate swap agreements used
for interest rate risk management |
|
|
63,618 |
|
|
|
63,618 |
|
|
|
146,111 |
|
|
|
146,111 |
|
- 37 -
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED
10. Fair value measurements, continued
The following assumptions and methods or calculations were used in determining the estimated
fair value of financial instruments not measured at fair value in the consolidated balance sheet.
Cash and cash equivalents, interest-bearing deposits at banks, short-term borrowings, accrued
interest receivable and accrued interest payable
Due to the nature of cash and cash equivalents and the near maturity of interest-bearing deposits
at banks, short-term borrowings, accrued interest receivable and accrued interest payable, the
Company estimated that the carrying amount of such instruments approximated estimated fair value.
Agreements to resell securities
The amounts assigned to agreements to resell securities were based on discounted calculations of
projected cash flows.
Investment securities
Estimated fair values of investments in readily marketable securities were generally based on
quoted market prices. Investment securities that were not readily marketable were assigned amounts
based on estimates provided by outside parties or modeling techniques that relied upon discounted
calculations of projected cash flows or, in the case of other investment securities, which include
capital stock of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York and the Federal Home Loan Bank of New York,
at an amount equal to the carrying amount.
Loans and leases
In general, discount rates used to calculate values for loan products were based on the Companys
pricing at the respective period end and included appropriate adjustments for expected credit losses.
A higher discount rate was assumed with respect to estimated cash flows associated with nonaccrual
loans. Projected loan cash flows were adjusted for estimated credit losses. However, such estimates
made by the Company may not be indicative of assumptions and adjustments that a purchaser of the
Companys loans and leases would seek.
Deposits
Pursuant to GAAP, the estimated fair value ascribed to noninterest-bearing deposits, savings
deposits and NOW accounts must be established at carrying value because of the customers ability
to withdraw funds immediately. Time deposit accounts are required to be revalued based upon
prevailing market interest rates for similar maturity instruments. As a result, amounts assigned to
time deposits were based on discounted cash flow calculations using prevailing market interest
rates based on the Companys pricing at the respective date for deposits with comparable remaining
terms to maturity.
The Company believes that deposit accounts have a value greater than that prescribed by GAAP. The
Company feels, however, that the value associated with these deposits is greatly influenced by
characteristics of the buyer, such as the ability to reduce the costs of servicing the deposits and
deposit attrition which often occurs following an acquisition. Accordingly, estimating the fair
value of deposits with any degree of certainty is not practical.
Long-term borrowings
The amounts assigned to long-term borrowings were based on quoted market prices, when available, or
were based on discounted cash flow calculations using prevailing market interest rates for
borrowings of similar terms and credit risk.
- 38 -
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED
10. Fair value measurements, continued
Commitments to originate real estate loans for sale and commitments to sell real estate loans
The Company enters into various commitments to originate real estate loans for sale and commitments
to sell real estate loans. Such commitments are considered to be derivative financial instruments
and, therefore, are carried at estimated fair value on the consolidated balance sheet. The
estimated fair values of such commitments were generally calculated by reference to quoted market
prices for commitments to sell real estate loans to certain government-sponsored entities and other
parties.
Interest rate swap agreements used for interest rate risk management
The estimated fair value of interest rate swap agreements used for interest rate risk management
represents the amount the Company would have expected to receive or pay to terminate such
agreements.
Other commitments and contingencies
As described in note 11, in the normal course of business, various commitments and contingent
liabilities are outstanding, such as loan commitments, credit guarantees and letters of credit. The
Companys pricing of such financial instruments is based largely on credit quality and
relationship, probability of funding and other requirements. Loan commitments often have fixed
expiration dates and contain termination and other clauses which provide for relief from funding in
the event of significant deterioration in the credit quality of the customer. The rates and terms
of the Companys loan commitments, credit guarantees and letters of credit are competitive with
other financial institutions operating in markets served by the Company. The Company believes that
the carrying amounts, which are included in other liabilities, are reasonable estimates of the fair
value of these financial instruments.
The Company does not believe that the estimated information presented herein is representative of
the earnings power or value of the Company. The preceding analysis, which is inherently limited in
depicting fair value, also does not consider any value associated with existing customer
relationships nor the ability of the Company to create value through loan origination, deposit
gathering or fee generating activities.
Many of the estimates presented herein are based upon the use of highly subjective information and
assumptions and, accordingly, the results may not be precise. Management believes that fair value
estimates may not be comparable between financial institutions due to the wide range of permitted
valuation techniques and numerous estimates which must be made. Furthermore, because the disclosed
fair value amounts were estimated as of the balance sheet date, the amounts actually realized or
paid upon maturity or settlement of the various financial instruments could be significantly
different.
- 39 -
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED
11. Commitments and contingencies
In the normal course of business, various commitments and contingent liabilities are outstanding.
The following table presents the Companys significant commitments. Certain of these commitments
are not included in the Companys consolidated balance sheet.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
|
(in thousands) |
Commitments to extend credit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home equity lines of credit |
|
$ |
6,636,329 |
|
|
|
5,972,541 |
|
Commercial real estate loans
to be sold |
|
|
75,115 |
|
|
|
252,559 |
|
Other commercial real estate
and construction |
|
|
2,150,497 |
|
|
|
2,238,464 |
|
Residential real estate loans
to be sold |
|
|
909,547 |
|
|
|
870,578 |
|
Other residential real estate |
|
|
235,663 |
|
|
|
211,705 |
|
Commercial and other |
|
|
7,244,702 |
|
|
|
6,666,988 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Standby letters of credit |
|
|
3,872,298 |
|
|
|
3,886,396 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial letters of credit |
|
|
50,729 |
|
|
|
45,503 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial guarantees and
indemnification contracts |
|
|
1,589,212 |
|
|
|
1,546,873 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments to sell
real estate loans |
|
|
1,409,254 |
|
|
|
1,306,041 |
|
Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to customers, generally having fixed
expiration dates or other termination clauses that may require payment of a fee. Standby and
commercial letters of credit are conditional commitments issued to guarantee the performance of a
customer to a third party. Standby letters of credit generally are contingent upon the failure of
the customer to perform according to the terms of the underlying contract with the third party,
whereas commercial letters of credit are issued to facilitate commerce and typically result in the
commitment being funded when the underlying transaction is consummated between the customer and a
third party. The credit risk associated with commitments to extend credit and standby and
commercial letters of credit is essentially the same as that involved with extending loans to
customers and is subject to normal credit policies. Collateral may be obtained based on
managements assessment of the customers creditworthiness.
Financial guarantees and indemnification contracts are oftentimes similar to standby letters
of credit and may include mandatory purchase agreements issued to ensure that customer obligations
are fulfilled, recourse obligations associated with sold loans, and other guarantees of customer
performance or compliance with designated rules and regulations. Included in financial guarantees
and indemnification contracts are loan principal amounts sold with recourse in conjunction with the
Companys involvement in the Federal National Mortgage Association Delegated Underwriting and
Servicing program. The Companys maximum credit risk for recourse associated with loans sold under
this program totaled approximately $1.2 billion at each of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008.
Since many loan commitments, standby letters of credit, and guarantees and indemnification
contracts expire without being funded in whole or in part, the contract amounts are not necessarily
indicative of future cash flows.
- 40 -
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED
11. Commitments and contingencies, continued
The Company utilizes commitments to sell real estate loans to hedge exposure to changes in the
fair value of real estate loans held for sale. Such commitments are considered derivatives and
along with commitments to originate real estate loans to be held for sale are generally recorded in
the consolidated balance sheet at estimated fair market value.
The Company has an agreement with the Baltimore Ravens of the National Football League whereby
the Company obtained the naming rights to a football stadium in Baltimore, Maryland. Under the
agreement, the Company is obligated to pay $5 million per year through 2013 and $6 million per year
from 2014 through 2017.
The Company also has commitments under long-term operating leases.
The Company reinsures credit life and accident and health insurance purchased by consumer loan
customers. The Company also enters into reinsurance contracts with third party insurance companies
who insure against the risk of a mortgage borrowers payment default in connection with certain
mortgage loans originated by the Company. When providing reinsurance coverage, the Company
receives a premium in exchange for accepting a portion of the insurers risk of loss. The
outstanding loan principal balances reinsured by the Company were approximately $102 million at
June 30, 2009. Assets of subsidiaries providing reinsurance that are available to satisfy claims
totaled approximately $69 million at June 30, 2009. The amounts noted above are not necessarily
indicative of losses which may ultimately be incurred. Such losses are expected to be
substantially less because most loans are repaid by borrowers in accordance with the original loan
terms.
M&T and its subsidiaries are subject in the normal course of business to various pending and
threatened legal proceedings in which claims for monetary damages are asserted. Management, after
consultation with legal counsel, does not anticipate that the aggregate ultimate liability arising
out of litigation pending against M&T or its subsidiaries will be material to the Companys
consolidated financial position, but at the present time is not in a position to determine whether
such litigation will have a material adverse effect on the Companys consolidated results of
operations in any future reporting period.
12. Segment information
Reportable segments have been determined based upon the Companys internal profitability reporting
system, which is organized by strategic business unit. Certain strategic business units have been
combined for segment information reporting purposes where the nature of the products and services,
the type of customer and the distribution of those products and services are similar. The
reportable segments are Business Banking, Commercial Banking, Commercial Real Estate, Discretionary
Portfolio, Residential Mortgage Banking and Retail Banking.
The financial information of the Companys segments was compiled utilizing the accounting
policies described in note 22 to the Companys consolidated financial statements as of and for the
year ended December 31, 2008. The management accounting policies and processes utilized in
compiling segment financial information are highly subjective and, unlike financial accounting, are
not based on authoritative guidance similar to GAAP. As a result, the financial information of the
reported segments is not necessarily comparable with similar information reported by other
financial institutions. As also described in note 22 to the Companys 2008 consolidated financial
statements, neither goodwill nor core deposit and other intangible assets (and the amortization
charges associated with such assets) resulting from acquisitions of financial institutions have
been allocated to the Companys reportable segments,
- 41 -
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED
12. Segment information, continued
but are included in the All Other category. The Company does, however, assign such intangible
assets to business units for purposes of testing for impairment.
Information about the Companys segments is presented in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended June 30 |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inter- |
|
|
Net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inter- |
|
|
Net |
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
segment |
|
|
income |
|
|
Total |
|
|
segment |
|
|
income |
|
|
|
revenues(a) |
|
|
revenues |
|
|
(loss) |
|
|
revenues(a) |
|
|
revenues |
|
|
(loss) |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Business
Banking |
|
$ |
103,132 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,699 |
|
|
|
91,995 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
29,547 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
Banking |
|
|
186,558 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70,003 |
|
|
|
153,566 |
|
|
|
165 |
|
|
|
53,516 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
Real Estate |
|
|
100,847 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
23,457 |
|
|
|
88,273 |
|
|
|
203 |
|
|
|
42,646 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discretionary
Portfolio |
|
|
16,433 |
|
|
|
(3,693 |
) |
|
|
(3,279 |
) |
|
|
28,792 |
|
|
|
(4,170 |
) |
|
|
5,324 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential
Mortgage Banking |
|
|
80,016 |
|
|
|
15,002 |
|
|
|
(10,877 |
) |
|
|
64,021 |
|
|
|
12,953 |
|
|
|
(10,420 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retail Banking |
|
|
313,025 |
|
|
|
2,509 |
|
|
|
54,184 |
|
|
|
292,175 |
|
|
|
3,355 |
|
|
|
62,927 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Other |
|
|
(26,795 |
) |
|
|
(13,851 |
) |
|
|
(112,999 |
) |
|
|
38,992 |
|
|
|
(12,509 |
) |
|
|
(23,275 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
773,216 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51,188 |
|
|
|
757,814 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
160,265 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30 |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inter- |
|
|
Net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inter- |
|
|
Net |
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
segment |
|
|
income |
|
|
Total |
|
|
segment |
|
|
income |
|
|
|
revenues(a) |
|
|
revenues |
|
|
(loss) |
|
|
revenues(a) |
|
|
revenues |
|
|
(loss) |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Business
Banking |
|
$ |
196,767 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60,811 |
|
|
|
187,244 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
62,330 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
Banking |
|
|
351,685 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
127,157 |
|
|
|
316,150 |
|
|
|
250 |
|
|
|
120,325 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
Real Estate |
|
|
189,811 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
66,440 |
|
|
|
174,551 |
|
|
|
411 |
|
|
|
85,455 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discretionary
Portfolio |
|
|
27,731 |
|
|
|
(6,777 |
) |
|
|
(8,368 |
) |
|
|
72,267 |
|
|
|
(8,499 |
) |
|
|
21,301 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential
Mortgage Banking |
|
160,027 |
|
|
|
26,871 |
|
|
|
(5,377 |
) |
|
|
131,439 |
|
|
|
26,284 |
|
|
|
(5,361 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retail Banking |
|
|
597,677 |
|
|
|
5,164 |
|
|
|
106,547 |
|
|
|
595,043 |
|
|
|
6,322 |
|
|
|
138,397 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Other |
|
|
(70,334 |
) |
|
|
(25,297 |
) |
|
|
(231,801 |
) |
|
|
72,633 |
|
|
|
(24,771 |
) |
|
|
(59,986 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,453,364 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
115,409 |
|
|
|
1,549,327 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
362,461 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- 42 -
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED
12. Segment information, continued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average total assets |
|
|
|
Six months ended |
|
|
Year ended |
|
|
|
June 30 |
|
|
December 31 |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
Business Banking |
|
$ |
4,686 |
|
|
|
4,415 |
|
|
|
4,452 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial Banking |
|
|
15,414 |
|
|
|
14,692 |
|
|
|
14,981 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial Real Estate |
|
|
12,135 |
|
|
|
11,230 |
|
|
|
11,394 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discretionary
Portfolio |
|
|
13,506 |
|
|
|
14,725 |
|
|
|
14,179 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential Mortgage
Banking |
|
|
2,801 |
|
|
|
2,743 |
|
|
|
2,660 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retail Banking |
|
|
11,484 |
|
|
|
11,459 |
|
|
|
11,356 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Other |
|
|
5,855 |
|
|
|
6,035 |
|
|
|
6,110 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
65,881 |
|
|
|
65,299 |
|
|
|
65,132 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Total revenues are comprised of net interest income and other income. Net interest income is
the difference between taxable-equivalent interest earned on assets and interest paid on
liabilities owed by a segment and a funding charge (credit) based on the Companys internal
funds transfer and allocation methodology. Segments are charged a cost to fund any assets
(e.g. loans) and are paid a funding credit for any funds provided (e.g. deposits). The
taxable-equivalent adjustment aggregated $5,214,000 and $5,851,000 for the three-month periods
ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, and $10,147,000 and $11,634,000 for the six-month
periods ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, and is eliminated in All Other total
revenues. Intersegment revenues are included in total revenues of the reportable segments.
The elimination of intersegment revenues is included in the determination of All Other total
revenues. |
13. Relationship with Bayview Lending Group LLC and Bayview Financial Holdings, L.P.
In 2007 M&T invested $300 million to acquire a 20% minority interest in Bayview Lending Group LLC
(BLG), a privately-held company that, together with its affiliates, specializes in originating,
securitizing and servicing small balance commercial real estate loans. M&T recognizes income from
BLG using the equity method of accounting.
Bayview Financial Holdings, L.P. (together with its affiliates, Bayview Financial), a
privately-held specialty mortgage finance company, is BLGs majority investor. In addition to
their common investment in BLG, the Company and Bayview Financial conduct other business activities
with each other. The Company has purchased loan servicing rights for small balance commercial
mortgage loans from BLG and Bayview Financial having outstanding principal balances of $5.8 billion
and $5.9 billion at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively. Amounts recorded as
capitalized servicing assets for such loans totaled $49 million at June 30, 2009 and $58 million at
December 31, 2008. In addition, capitalized servicing rights at June 30, 2009 and December 31,
2008 also included $22 million and $28 million, respectively, for servicing rights that were
purchased from Bayview Financial related to residential mortgage loans
- 43 -
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED
13. Relationship with Bayview Lending Group LLC and Bayview Financial Holdings, L.P., continued
with outstanding principal balances of $4.3 billion at June 30, 2009 and $4.6 billion at December
31, 2008. Revenues from servicing residential and small balance commercial mortgage loans
purchased from BLG and Bayview Financial were $13 million in each of the three-month periods ended
June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, and $26 million and $27 million for the six months ended June
30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. M&T Bank provided $50 million and $71 million of credit
facilities to Bayview Financial at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively, of which $39
million and $57 million were outstanding at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively.
Finally, at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the Company held $23 million and $32 million,
respectively, of collateralized mortgage obligations in its available-for-sale investment
securities portfolio that were securitized by Bayview Financial. In addition, the Company held
$384 million and $412 million of similar investment securities in its held-to-maturity portfolio at
June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively.
- 44 -
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
Overview
M&T Bank Corporation (M&T) recorded net income in the second quarter of 2009 of $51 million or
$.36 of diluted earnings per common share, compared with $160 million or $1.44 of diluted earnings
per common share in the second quarter of 2008. During the initial quarter of 2009, net income
totaled $64 million or $.49 of diluted earnings per common share. Basic earnings per common share
were $.36 in the recent quarter, compared with $1.45 in the year-earlier quarter and $.49 in the
first quarter of 2009. The after-tax impact of acquisition and integration-related expenses
(included herein as merger-related expenses) associated with M&Ts May 23, 2009 acquisition of
Provident Bankshares Corporation (Provident) was $40 million ($66 million pre-tax) or $.35 of
basic and diluted earnings per common share in the recent quarter, compared with $1 million ($2
million pre-tax) or $.01 of basic and diluted earnings per common share in the first quarter of
2009. There were no merger-related expenses in the second quarter of 2008. For the first six
months of 2009, net income totaled $115 million or $.85 of diluted earnings per common share,
compared with $362 million or $3.26 of diluted earnings per common share in the corresponding 2008
period. Basic earnings per common share for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2009 and 2008
were $.85 and $3.29, respectively. The after-tax impact of merger-related expenses associated with
Provident in 2009 and with the November 30, 2007 acquisition of Partners Trust Financial Group,
Inc. and the December 7, 2007 acquisition by M&T Bank, the principal bank subsidiary of M&T, of the
Mid-Atlantic retail banking franchise of First Horizon Bank in 2008 was $42 million ($69 million
pre-tax) or $.37 of basic and diluted earnings per common share and $2 million ($4 million pre-tax)
or $.02 of basic and diluted earnings per common share during the six-month periods ended June 30,
2009 and 2008, respectively.
The annualized rate of return on average total assets for M&T and its consolidated
subsidiaries (the Company) in the second quarter of 2009 was .31%, compared with .98% in the
year-earlier quarter and .40% in the first quarter of 2009. The annualized rate of return on
average common stockholders equity was 2.53% in the recent quarter, compared with 9.96% in the
second quarter of 2008 and 3.61% in the first 2009 quarter. During the six-month period ended June
30, 2009, the annualized rates of return on average assets and average common stockholders equity
were .35% and 3.06%, respectively, compared with 1.12% and 11.23%, respectively, in the
corresponding period of 2008.
On May 23, 2009, M&T completed the acquisition of Provident, a bank holding company based in
Baltimore, Maryland. Provident Bank, Providents banking subsidiary, was merged into M&T Bank on
that date. The results of operations acquired in the Provident transaction have been included in
the Companys financial results since May 23, 2009, but did not have a material effect on the
Companys results of operations in the recent quarter. Provident common shareholders
received .171625 shares of M&T common stock in exchange for each share of Provident common stock, resulting
in M&T issuing a total of 5,838,308 common shares in connection with the acquisition. In addition,
based on the merger agreement, outstanding and unexercised options to purchase common stock of
Provident converted to options to purchase the common stock of M&T. The fair value of those
options was approximately $1 million. In total, the purchase price was approximately $274 million
based on the fair value on the acquisition date of M&T common stock exchanged and the fair value of
the options to purchase M&T common stock. Holders of Providents preferred stock were issued
shares of new Series B and Series C Preferred Stock of M&T having substantially identical terms.
That preferred stock added $156 million to M&Ts stockholders equity. The Series B Preferred
Stock has a preference value of $27 million, pays non-cumulative dividends at a rate of 10%, and is
convertible into 433,148 shares of M&T common stock. The Series C Preferred Stock has a preference
value of $152
- 45 -
million, pays cumulative dividends at a rate of 5% through November 2013 and 9% thereafter,
and is held by the U.S. Department of Treasury under the Troubled Asset Relief Program Capital
Purchase Program.
The transaction has been accounted for under the acquisition method of accounting.
Accordingly, the assets acquired and liabilities assumed were recorded by M&T at their estimated
fair values as of the acquisition date. Assets acquired totaled $6.3 billion, including $4.0
billion of loans and leases (including approximately $1.7 billion of commercial real estate loans,
$1.4 billion of consumer loans, $700 million of commercial loans and leases and $300 million of
residential real estate loans) and $1.0 billion of investment securities. Liabilities assumed were
$5.9 billion, including $5.1 billion of deposits. The transaction added $436 million to M&Ts
stockholders equity, including $280 million of common equity and $156 million of preferred equity.
In connection with the acquisition, the Company recorded $332 million of goodwill and $63 million
of core deposit intangible. The core deposit intangible is being amortized over seven years using
an accelerated method. The acquisition of Provident expands the Companys presence in the
Mid-Atlantic area, gives the Company the second largest deposit share in Maryland, and tripled the
Companys presence in Virginia.
Application of the acquisition method requires that acquired loans be recorded at fair value
and prohibits the carry over of the acquired entitys allowance for credit losses. Determining the
fair value of the acquired loans required estimating cash flows expected to be collected on the
loans. The impact of estimated credit losses on all acquired loans was considered in the
estimation of future cash flows used in the determination of estimated fair value as of the
acquisition date.
Merger-related expenses associated with the acquisition of Provident incurred during the
quarters ended June 30 and March 31, 2009 totaled $66 million ($40 million after tax effect) and $2
million ($1 million after tax effect), respectively. Such expenses were for professional services
and other temporary help fees associated with the conversion of systems and/or integration of
operations; costs related to branch and office consolidations; costs related to termination of
existing Provident contractual arrangements for various services; initial marketing and promotion
expenses designed to introduce M&T Bank to Providents customers; severance and incentive
compensation costs; travel costs; and printing, supplies and other costs of commencing operations
in new markets and offices. The Company will incur additional merger-related expenses in the
second half of 2009, although such costs are expected to be substantially less than the amount
incurred in the first six months of 2009. Additional information about the acquisition of
Provident is provided in note 2 of Notes to Financial Statements.
The condition of the residential real estate marketplace and the U.S. economy from 2007
through the first half of 2009 has had a significant impact on the financial services industry as a
whole, and specifically on the financial results of the Company. A pronounced downturn in the
residential real estate market that began in early 2007 has resulted in significantly lower
residential real estate values and higher delinquencies and charge-offs of loans, including loans
to builders and developers of residential real estate. During 2009, the Company has experienced
higher delinquencies and charge-offs related to its commercial loan and commercial real estate loan
portfolios as well. Additionally, investment securities backed by residential and commercial real
estate have reflected substantial unrealized losses due to a lack of liquidity in the financial
markets and anticipated credit losses. Many financial institutions, including the Company, have
taken charges for those unrealized losses that were deemed to be other than temporary.
The Companys financial results for the second quarter of 2009 were adversely impacted by
certain notable events. During the recent quarter, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
(FDIC) announced that it would levy a special assessment on insured financial institutions to
rebuild the Deposit
- 46 -
Insurance Fund. That special assessment amounted to $33 million ($20 million after tax
effect, or $.17 of diluted earnings per common share). Also during the recent quarter,
other-than-temporary impairment charges of $25 million (pre-tax) were recorded on certain privately
issued collateralized mortgage obligations (CMOs) backed by residential real estate loans and
collateralized debt obligations (CDOs) backed by pooled trust preferred securities of financial
institutions. Such securities are held in the Companys available-for-sale investment securities
portfolio. Those charges reduced net income and diluted earnings per common share by $15 million
and $.13, respectively.
The Companys financial results for the first quarter of 2009 reflected other-than-temporary
impairment charges of $32 million ($20 million after taxes, or $.18 of diluted earnings per common
share) that were recorded on certain privately issued CMOs. Those securities, which are secured by
residential real estate loans, are also held in the Companys available-for-sale investment
securities portfolio.
Reflected in the Companys financial results for the first quarter of 2008 was $29 million, or
$.26 of diluted earnings per share, resulting from the status of M&T Bank as a member bank of Visa.
During the last quarter of 2007, Visa completed a reorganization in contemplation of its initial
public offering (IPO) in 2008. As part of that reorganization M&T Bank and other member banks of
Visa received shares of Class B common stock of Visa. Those banks are also obligated under various
agreements with Visa to share in losses stemming from certain litigation involving Visa (Covered
Litigation). As of December 31, 2007, although Visa was expected to set aside a portion of the
proceeds from its IPO in an escrow account to fund any judgments or settlements that may arise out
of the Covered Litigation, guidance from the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) indicated
that Visa member banks should record a liability for the fair value of the contingent obligation to
Visa. The estimation of the Companys proportionate share of any potential losses related to the
Covered Litigation was extremely difficult and involved a great deal of judgment. Nevertheless, in
the fourth quarter of 2007 the Company recorded a pre-tax charge of $23 million ($14 million after
tax effect, or $.13 per diluted common share) related to the Covered Litigation. In accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) and consistent with the SEC guidance, the Company
did not recognize any value for its common stock ownership interest in Visa as of the 2007
year-end. During the first quarter of 2008, Visa completed its IPO and, as part of the
transaction, funded an escrow account with $3 billion from the proceeds of the IPO to cover
potential settlements arising out of the Covered Litigation. As a result, during the first three
months of 2008, the Company reversed approximately $15 million of the $23 million accrued during
the fourth quarter of 2007 for the Covered Litigation. In addition, M&T Bank was allocated
1,967,028 Class B common shares of Visa based on its proportionate ownership of Visa. Of those
shares, 760,455 were mandatorily redeemed in March 2008 for an after-tax gain of $20 million ($33
million pre-tax). That pre-tax amount was recorded as gain on bank investment securities in the
consolidated statement of income for 2008s initial quarter.
Supplemental Reporting of Non-GAAP Results of Operations
As a result of business combinations and other acquisitions, the Company had intangible assets
consisting of goodwill and core deposit and other intangible assets totaling $3.7 billion at June
30, 2009, compared with $3.4 billion at each of June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2008. Included in
such intangible assets was goodwill of $3.5 billion at June 30, 2009 and $3.2 billion at each of
June 30 and December 31, 2008. Amortization of core deposit and other intangible assets, after tax
effect, was $9 million during each of the second and first quarters of 2009, ($.08 per diluted
common share and $.09 per diluted common share, respectively) and $10 million ($.09 per diluted
common share) in the second quarter of 2008. For the six-month periods ended June 30,
- 47 -
2009 and 2008, amortization of core deposit and other intangible assets, after tax effect, totaled
$19 million ($.17 per diluted common share) and $21 million ($.19 per diluted common share),
respectively.
M&T consistently provides supplemental reporting of its results on a net operating or
tangible basis, from which M&T excludes the after-tax effect of amortization of core deposit and
other intangible assets (and the related goodwill, core deposit intangible and other intangible
asset balances, net of applicable deferred tax amounts) and expenses associated with merging
acquired operations into the Company, since such expenses are considered by management to be
nonoperating in nature. Although net operating income as defined by M&T is not a GAAP measure,
M&Ts management believes that this information helps investors understand the effect of
acquisition activity in reported results.
Net operating income was $101 million in the second quarter of 2009, compared with $170
million in the year-earlier quarter. Diluted net operating earnings per common share for the
recent quarter were $.79, compared with $1.53 in the second quarter of 2008. Net operating income
and diluted net operating earnings per common share were $75 million and $.59, respectively, in the
first quarter of 2009. For the first six months of 2009, net operating income and diluted net
operating earnings per common share were $176 million and $1.39, respectively, compared with $386
million and $3.47, respectively, in the similar 2008 period.
Net operating income expressed as an annualized return on average tangible assets was .64% in
the second quarter of 2009, compared with 1.10% in the year-earlier quarter and .50% in the initial
2009 quarter. Net operating income expressed as an annualized return on average tangible common
equity was 12.08% in the recently completed quarter, compared with 22.20% and 9.36% in the quarters
ended June 30, 2008 and March 31, 2009, respectively. For the first half of 2009, net operating
income represented an annualized return on average tangible assets and average tangible common
stockholders equity of .57% and 10.76%, respectively, compared with 1.25% and 25.04%,
respectively, in the six-month period ended June 30, 2008.
Reconciliations of GAAP amounts with corresponding non-GAAP amounts are provided in table 2.
Taxable-equivalent Net Interest Income
Taxable-equivalent net interest income rose 3% to $507 million in the second quarter of 2009 from
$492 million in the corresponding quarter of 2008. That improvement was the result of higher
average earning assets, which increased to $59.3 billion in the recent quarter from $58.5 billion
in the second quarter of 2008, and a 4 basis point (hundredths of one percent) improvement in the
Companys net interest margin, or taxable-equivalent net interest income expressed as an annualized
percentage of average earning assets. Taxable-equivalent net interest income totaled $453 million
in the first quarter of 2009. The recent quarters significant improvement from the immediately
preceding quarter resulted from a 24 basis point widening of the net interest margin and a rise in
average earning assets of $1.8 billion. The improvement in net interest margin was largely
attributable to declines in the rates paid on deposits and long-term borrowings. The higher level
of earning assets in the recent quarter was the result of assets obtained in the Provident
transaction, which at the acquisition date totaled approximately $5.1 billion.
For the first half of 2009, taxable-equivalent net interest income was $960 million, 2% below
$977 million in the corresponding period of 2008. That decline was largely attributable to a 7
basis point narrowing of the Companys net interest margin due to a lower contribution of
interest-free funds.
- 48 -
Average loans and leases rose $1.0 billion, or 2%, to $50.6 billion in the second quarter of
2009 from $49.5 billion in the similar 2008 quarter, and were $1.7 billion, or 4%, higher than the
$48.8 billion averaged in the first quarter of 2009. Included in average loans and leases in the
recent quarter were loans obtained in the Provident acquisition, which added approximately $1.7
billion to the average loan and lease total. Commercial loans and leases averaged $14.1 billion in
the second quarter of 2009, up $266 million or 2% from $13.8 billion in the year-earlier quarter.
Such loans and leases acquired from Provident added approximately $300 million to the recent
quarters average total. Average commercial real estate loans were $19.7 billion in the recent
quarter, $1.2 billion or 7% higher than $18.5 billion in 2008s second quarter, and reflected loans
obtained from Provident averaging approximately $700 million in the recent quarter. Average
outstanding residential real estate loans declined $764 million, or 13%, to $5.3 billion in the
second quarter of 2009, as compared with the $6.0 billion averaged in the year-earlier quarter.
Included in that portfolio were loans held for sale, which averaged $720 million in the recent
quarter, compared with $728 million in the second quarter of 2008, and loans acquired from
Provident, which averaged $100 million in the recent quarter. The decline in average residential
real estate loans from 2008s second quarter to the recent quarter was largely attributable to
securitization transactions in June and July 2008, which aggregated $875 million and resulted in
the transfer of balances from loans to investment securities. A similar securitization in March
2009 was completed aggregating $141 million. In each of those transactions residential real estate
loans were securitized into mortgage-backed securities guaranteed by the Federal National Mortgage
Association (Fannie Mae), which are now held in the Companys available-for-sale investment
securities portfolio. The securitizations were completed to improve the Companys liquidity,
because investment securities may be more easily pledged as collateral for borrowings, and to
enhance regulatory capital ratios, because Fannie Mae guaranteed securities have a lower risk
rating than whole loans for regulatory capital purposes. Average consumer loans rose 3% or $301
million from the year-earlier period. That growth was due to loans related to the Provident
acquisition, which averaged $600 million (largely home equity loans and lines of credit), partially
offset by a decline in average automobile loans and leases.
The predominant factor contributing to the growth in average loans outstanding from $48.8
billion in 2009s initial quarter to $50.6 billion in the second quarter of 2009 was the addition
of the Provident loans. Excluding the impact of the acquired loans, total average loans outstanding
were little changed from the first quarter to the second quarter of 2009. The accompanying table
summarizes quarterly changes in the major components of the loan and lease portfolio.
AVERAGE LOANS AND LEASES
(net of unearned discount)
Dollars in millions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent increase |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(decrease) from |
|
|
|
2nd Qtr. |
|
|
2nd Qtr. |
|
|
1st Qtr. |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Commercial, financial, etc. |
|
$ |
14,067 |
|
|
|
2 |
% |
|
|
|
% |
Real estate commercial |
|
|
19,719 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
Real estate consumer |
|
|
5,262 |
|
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
5 |
|
Consumer |
|
Automobile |
|
|
3,194 |
|
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
Home equity lines |
|
|
5,218 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
Home equity loans |
|
|
981 |
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
4 |
|
Other |
|
|
2,113 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total consumer |
|
|
11,506 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
50,554 |
|
|
|
2 |
% |
|
|
4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- 49 -
For the first two quarters of 2009, average loans and leases totaled $49.7 billion, 1% above
$49.0 billion in the first six months of 2008. Increases in average balances of commercial loans
and leases and commercial real estate loans were partially offset by declines in average
residential real estate loans outstanding due largely to the securitization transactions already
noted. Acquired Provident loans added approximately $850 million to average loan and lease
balances in the first half of 2009.
The investment securities portfolio averaged $8.5 billion in each of the first and second
quarters of 2009, compared with $8.8 billion in the second quarter of 2008. The decline in such
securities from the second quarter of 2008 to the recent quarter largely reflects paydowns of
mortgage-backed securities, partially offset by the Fannie Mae mortgage-backed securities created
in the securitization transactions already noted and by investment securities obtained in the
Provident transaction. Securities obtained in the Provident transaction increased average
investment securities balances in the recent quarter by approximately $450 million. As compared
with the initial quarter of 2009, the impact of the already noted March 2009 securitization and the
acquired Provident investment securities was offset by paydowns of mortgage-backed securities.
The investment securities portfolio is largely comprised of residential and commercial
mortgage-backed securities and CMOs, debt securities issued by municipalities, debt and preferred
equity securities issued by government-sponsored agencies and certain financial institutions, and
shorter-term U.S. Treasury and federal agency notes. When purchasing investment securities, the
Company considers its overall interest-rate risk profile as well as the adequacy of expected
returns relative to the risks assumed, including prepayments. In managing its investment
securities portfolio, the Company occasionally sells investment securities as a result of changes
in interest rates and spreads, actual or anticipated prepayments, credit risk associated with a
particular security, or as a result of restructuring its investment securities portfolio following
completion of a business combination.
The Company regularly reviews its investment securities for declines in value below amortized
cost that might be characterized as other than temporary. As previously noted, an
other-than-temporary impairment charge of $25 million (pre-tax) was recognized in the second
quarter of 2009 related to certain privately issued CMOs and CDOs held in the Companys
available-for-sale investment securities portfolio. During 2009s first quarter, the Company
recognized other-than-temporary impairment charges of $32 million (pre-tax) related to certain
privately issued CMOs. Those securities, which are collateralized by residential real estate
loans, are also held in the Companys available-for-sale investment securities portfolio. In the
second quarter of 2008, an other-than-temporary impairment charge of $6 million was recognized on
one CMO backed by option adjustable rate residential mortgages. Weak economic conditions, rising
unemployment and declining real estate values are significant factors contributing to the
recognition of the other-than-temporary impairment charges. As of June 30, 2009 and December 31,
2008, the Company concluded that the remaining declines associated with the rest of the investment
securities portfolio were temporary in nature. That conclusion was based on managements
assessment of future cash flows associated with individual investment securities as of each
respective date. A further discussion of fair values of investment securities is included herein
under the heading Capital. Additional information about the investment securities portfolio is
included in notes 3 and 10 of Notes to Financial Statements.
Other earning assets include deposits at banks, trading account assets, federal funds sold and
agreements to resell securities. Those other earning assets in the aggregate averaged $235 million
in the recent quarter, compared with $173 million and $195 million in the second quarter of 2008
and the first quarter of 2009, respectively. The amounts of investment securities and other
earning assets held by the Company are influenced by such factors as demand for
- 50 -
loans, which generally yield more than investment securities and other earning assets, ongoing
repayments, the level of deposits, and management of balance sheet size and resulting capital
ratios.
As a result of the changes described herein, average earning assets totaled $59.3 billion in
the second quarter of 2009, compared with $58.5 billion in the similar quarter of 2008. Average
earning assets were $57.5 billion in the initial quarter of 2009, and aggregated $58.4 billion and
$58.1 billion during the six-month periods ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
The most significant source of funding for the Company is core deposits, which are comprised
of noninterest-bearing deposits, nonbrokered interest-bearing transaction accounts, nonbrokered
savings deposits and nonbrokered domestic time deposits under $100,000. The Companys branch
network is its principal source of core deposits, which generally carry lower interest rates than
wholesale funds of comparable maturities. Certificates of deposit under $100,000 generated on a
nationwide basis by M&T Bank, National Association (M&T Bank, N.A.), a wholly owned bank
subsidiary of M&T, are also included in core deposits. Average core deposits aggregated $38.2
billion in the second quarter of 2009, compared with $31.6 billion in the second quarter of 2008
and $34.7 billion in the initial 2009 quarter. The acquisition of Provident added approximately
$1.4 billion to average core deposits in the second quarter of 2009. Excluding the impact of
deposits obtained in the Provident transaction, the growth in core deposits since the second
quarter of 2008 was due, in part, to a lower interest rate environment and to the continuing
recessionary environment in the U.S., and its impact on the attractiveness of alternative
investments to the Companys customers. During the declining interest rate environment, over the
last twelve months the Company has also experienced a shift in customer savings trends, as average
time deposits have continued to decline, while average noninterest-bearing deposits and savings
deposits have increased. The following table provides an analysis of quarterly changes in the
components of average core deposits. For the six-month periods ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, core
deposits averaged $36.5 billion and $31.1 billion, respectively.
AVERAGE CORE DEPOSITS
Dollars in millions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent increase |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(decrease) from |
|
|
|
2nd Qtr. |
|
|
2nd Qtr. |
|
|
1st Qtr. |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
NOW accounts |
|
$ |
503 |
|
|
|
(2 |
)% |
|
|
(2 |
)% |
Savings deposits |
|
|
21,650 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
Time deposits less than $100,000 |
|
|
5,496 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
3 |
|
Noninterest-bearing deposits |
|
|
10,533 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
38,182 |
|
|
|
21 |
% |
|
|
10 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Domestic time deposits of $100,000 or more, deposits originated through the Companys offshore
branch office, and brokered deposits provide additional sources of funding for the Company.
Domestic time deposits over $100,000, excluding brokered certificates of deposit, averaged $2.7
billion in the second quarter of 2009, compared with $2.2 billion in the year-earlier quarter and
$3.0 billion in the first quarter of 2009. Offshore branch deposits, primarily comprised of
accounts with balances of $100,000 or more, averaged $1.5 billion, $4.3 billion and $2.5 billion
for the three-month periods ended June 30, 2009, June 30, 2008 and March 31, 2009, respectively.
Average brokered time deposits aggregated $697 million in the second quarter of 2009, compared with
$1.4 billion in the year-earlier quarter and $435 million in the initial quarter of 2009.
Reflected in average brokered time deposits in the recent quarter were deposits obtained in the
Provident transaction, which added approximately $500 million to the quarters average. In
connection with the Companys management of interest rate risk, interest rate swap agreements have
been entered into under which the Company receives a fixed rate of interest and pays a variable
rate and that have notional
- 51 -
amounts and terms substantially similar to the amounts and terms of $25 million of brokered
time deposits. The Company also had brokered NOW and brokered money-market deposit accounts, which
in the aggregate averaged $842 million during the second quarter of 2009, compared with $124
million and $894 million during the similar quarter of 2008 and the first quarter of 2009,
respectively. The substantial increase in such average brokered deposit balances in the two most
recent quarters as compared with the second quarter of 2008 was the result of demand for such
deposits, largely resulting from the uncertain economic markets and the desire of brokerage firms
to earn reasonable yields while ensuring that customer deposits were fully insured. Offshore
branch deposits and brokered deposits have been used by the Company as alternatives to short-term
borrowings. Additional amounts of offshore branch deposits or brokered deposits may be added in
the future depending on market conditions, including demand by customers and other investors for
such deposits, and the cost of funds available from alternative sources at the time.
The Company also uses borrowings from banks, securities dealers, various Federal Home Loan
Banks (FHLBs), the Federal Reserve and others as sources of funding. Short-term borrowings
averaged $3.2 billion in the recent quarter, compared with $6.9 billion in the second quarter of
2008 and $3.5 billion in the first quarter of 2009. Beginning in the second quarter of 2008, the
Company has actively sought to increase the average maturity of its non-deposit sources of funds
and to reduce short-term borrowings. Included in average short-term borrowings were unsecured
federal funds borrowings, which generally mature daily, that averaged $1.6 billion, $5.0 billion
and $1.8 billion in the second quarters of 2009 and 2008, and the first quarter of 2009,
respectively. Overnight federal funds borrowings have historically represented the largest
component of short-term borrowings and are obtained from a wide variety of banks and other
financial institutions. Average short-term borrowings during the recent quarter included $902
million of borrowings from the FHLBs of New York and Atlanta, compared with $729 million in the
year-earlier quarter and $1.0 billion in the first quarter of 2009. Also included in short-term
borrowings were secured borrowings with the Federal Reserve through their Term Auction Facility
(TAF). Borrowings under the TAF averaged $604 million, $423 million and $467 million in the
three-month periods ended June 30, 2009, June 30, 2008 and March 31, 2009, respectively.
Outstanding borrowings under the TAF at June 30, 2009 totaled $1.0 billion. Additionally, in the
second quarter of 2008 short-term borrowings included a $500 million revolving asset-backed
structured borrowing secured by automobile loans. That borrowing was repaid during the final
quarter of 2008. All of the available amount of that structured borrowing was in use during 2008s
second quarter.
Long-term borrowings averaged $11.5 billion in the second quarter of 2009, compared with $11.4
billion in the corresponding quarter of 2008 and $11.6 billion in the first quarter of 2009.
Included in average long-term borrowings were amounts borrowed from the FHLBs of $6.5 billion in
each of the second quarters of 2009 and 2008, compared with $6.7 billion in the first quarter of
2009, and subordinated capital notes of $1.9 billion in each of those quarters. Junior
subordinated debentures associated with trust preferred securities that were included in average
long-term borrowings were $1.1 billion in each of the quarters ended June 30, 2009, June 30, 2008
and March 31, 2009. Information regarding trust preferred securities and the related junior
subordinated debentures is provided in note 4 of Notes to Financial Statements. Also included in
long-term borrowings were agreements to repurchase securities, which averaged $1.6 billion during
each of the second quarters of 2009 and 2008 and the first quarter of 2009. The agreements have
various repurchase dates through 2017, however, the contractual maturities of the underlying
securities extend beyond such repurchase dates.
Changes in the composition of the Companys earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities as
discussed herein, as well as changes in interest rates and spreads, can impact net interest income.
Net interest spread, or the
- 52 -
difference between the taxable-equivalent yield on earning assets and the rate paid on
interest-bearing liabilities, was 3.15% in the second quarter of 2009, compared with 3.02% in the
year-earlier quarter. The yield on earning assets during the recent quarter was 4.62%, down 104
basis points from 5.66% in the second quarter of 2008, while the rate paid on interest-bearing
liabilities decreased 117 basis points to 1.47% from 2.64% in the second quarter of 2008. In the
first quarter of 2009, the net interest spread was 2.91%, the yield on earning assets was 4.65% and
the rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities was 1.74%. As compared with the second quarter of
2008, the declines in rates resulted from the Federal Reserve lowering its benchmark overnight
federal funds target rate throughout 2008 seven times, such that, at March 31 and June 30, 2009,
the Federal Reserves target rate for overnight federal funds
was expressed as a range from 0% to .25%. The 13 basis point improvement in spread from the second quarter of 2008 to the recent
quarter was due, in part, to more significant declines in borrowing rates than in rates earned on
assets. The 24 basis point improvement in spread from the first quarter of 2009 to the second 2009
quarter was largely attributable to declines in the rates paid on deposits and long-term
borrowings. For the first half of 2009, the net interest spread was 3.02%, an increase of 4 basis
points from the similar 2008 period. The yield on earning assets and the rate paid on
interest-bearing liabilities were 4.63% and 1.61%, respectively, in the first six months of 2009,
compared with 5.93% and 2.95%, respectively, in the corresponding period of 2008.
Net interest-free funds consist largely of noninterest-bearing demand deposits and
stockholders equity, partially offset by bank owned life insurance and non-earning assets,
including goodwill and core deposit and other intangible assets. Net interest-free funds averaged
$11.3 billion in the second quarter of 2009, compared with $8.1 billion in the similar 2008 quarter
and $9.5 billion in the first quarter of 2009. The increase in net interest free funds in the
recent quarter as compared with the year-earlier period and the first quarter of 2009 was largely
the result of higher average balances of noninterest-bearing deposits and stockholders equity. In
connection with the acquisition of Provident, the Company added noninterest-bearing deposits of
$939 million on May 23, 2009. During the first six months of 2009 and 2008, average net
interest-free funds aggregated $10.4 billion and $7.9 billion, respectively. Goodwill and core
deposit and other intangible assets averaged $3.5 billion in the recent quarter, compared with $3.4
billion during the quarters ended June 30, 2008 and March 31, 2009. As already noted, goodwill and
core deposit intangible resulting from the Provident transaction totaled $332 million and $63
million, respectively, on the acquisition date. The cash surrender value of bank owned life
insurance averaged $1.3 billion during the recent quarter, compared with $1.2 billion during each
of the quarters ended June 30, 2008 and March 31, 2009. Increases in the cash surrender value of
bank owned life insurance are not included in interest income, but rather are recorded in other
revenues from operations.
The contribution of net interest-free funds to net interest margin was .28% in the two most
recent quarters, compared with .37% in the second quarter of 2008. That contribution for the first
half of the year was .29% in 2009 and .40% in 2008. The decline in the contribution to net
interest margin ascribed to net interest-free funds in the 2009 periods as compared with the 2008
periods resulted largely from the impact of lower interest rates on interest-bearing liabilities
used to value such contribution.
Reflecting the changes to the net interest spread and the contribution of interest-free funds
as described herein, the Companys net interest margin was 3.43% in the recent quarter, improved
from 3.39% in the corresponding 2008 quarter and 3.19% in the first quarter of 2009. During the
first six months of 2009 and 2008, the net interest margin was 3.31% and 3.38%, respectively.
Future changes in market interest rates or spreads, as well as changes in the composition of the
Companys portfolios of earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities that result in reductions
in spreads, could adversely impact the Companys net interest income and net interest margin.
- 53 -
Management assesses the potential impact of future changes in interest rates and spreads by
projecting net interest income under several interest rate scenarios. In managing interest rate
risk, the Company has utilized interest rate swap agreements to modify the repricing
characteristics of certain portions of its portfolios of earning assets and interest-bearing
liabilities. Periodic settlement amounts arising from these agreements are generally reflected in
either the yields earned on assets or the rates paid on interest-bearing liabilities. The notional
amount of interest rate swap agreements entered into for interest rate risk management purposes was
approximately $1.1 billion at each of June 30, 2009, March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, compared
with $1.2 billion at June 30, 2008. Under the terms of those swap agreements, the Company received
payments based on the outstanding notional amount of the swap agreements at fixed rates and made
payments at variable rates. Those swap agreements were designated as fair value hedges of certain
fixed rate time deposits and long-term borrowings. There were no interest rate swap agreements
designated as cash flow hedges at those respective dates.
The estimated aggregate fair value of interest rate swap agreements designated as fair value
hedges represented gains of approximately $64 million, $125 million and $146 million at June 30,
2009, March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively, and a loss of $8 million at June 30,
2008. The significant rise in fair value of those interest rate swap agreements since June 30,
2008 resulted from sharply lower interest rates at those later dates. The decline in fair value at
the recent quarter-end as compared with March 31, 2009 was attributable to higher interest rates at
the end of 2009s second quarter. The fair values of such swap agreements were substantially
offset by changes in the fair values of the hedged items. As a result, the amounts of hedge
ineffectiveness recognized during the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2009 and 2008
were not material to the Companys results of operations. The changes in the fair values of the
interest rate swap agreements and the hedged items result from the effects of changing interest
rates. The Companys credit exposure with respect to the estimated fair value as of June 30, 2009
of interest rate swap agreements used for managing interest rate risk has been substantially
mitigated through master netting arrangements with trading account interest rate contracts with the
same counterparties as well as counterparty postings of $39 million of collateral with the Company.
The weighted-average rates to be received and paid under interest rate swap agreements
currently in effect were 6.30% and 2.54%, respectively, at June 30, 2009. The average notional
amounts of interest rate swap agreements entered into for interest rate risk management purposes,
the related effect on net interest income and margin, and the weighted-average interest rates paid
or received on those swap agreements are presented in the accompanying table. Additional
information about the Companys use of interest rate swap agreements and other derivatives is
included in note 9 of Notes to Financial Statements.
- 54 -
INTEREST RATE SWAP AGREEMENTS
Dollars in thousands
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended June 30 |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Rate (a) |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Rate (a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
% |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
% |
Interest expense |
|
|
(9,519 |
) |
|
|
(.08 |
) |
|
|
(4,901 |
) |
|
|
(.04 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income/margin |
|
$ |
9,519 |
|
|
|
.07 |
% |
|
$ |
4,901 |
|
|
|
.04 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average notional amount |
|
$ |
1,087,461 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,126,582 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rate received(b) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.42 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.48 |
% |
Rate paid(b) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.91 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.73 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30 |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Rate (a) |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Rate (a) |
|
Increase (decrease) in: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
% |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
% |
Interest expense |
|
|
(16,934 |
) |
|
|
(.07 |
) |
|
|
(6,341 |
) |
|
|
(.03 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income/margin |
|
$ |
16,934 |
|
|
|
.06 |
% |
|
$ |
6,341 |
|
|
|
.02 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average notional amount |
|
$ |
1,097,296 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,425,840 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rate received(b) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.38 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.00 |
% |
Rate paid(b) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.27 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.11 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Computed as an annualized percentage of average earning assets or
interest-bearing liabilities. |
|
(b) |
|
Weighted-average rate paid or received on interest rate swap agreements
in effect during the period. |
As a financial intermediary, the Company is exposed to various risks, including liquidity and
market risk. Liquidity refers to the Companys ability to ensure that sufficient cash flow and
liquid assets are available to satisfy current and future obligations, including demands for loans
and deposit withdrawals, funding operating costs, and other corporate purposes. Liquidity risk
arises whenever the maturities of financial instruments included in assets and liabilities differ.
M&Ts banking subsidiaries have access to additional funding sources through borrowings from the
FHLB of New York, lines of credit with the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, and other available
borrowing facilities. The Company has, from time to time, issued subordinated capital notes to
provide liquidity and enhance regulatory capital ratios. Such notes qualify for inclusion in the
Companys total capital as defined by Federal regulators.
The Company has informal and sometimes reciprocal sources of funding available through various
arrangements for unsecured short-term borrowings from a wide group of banks and other financial
institutions. Over-night federal funds borrowings were $817 million, $1.6 billion and $809 million
at June 30, 2009, June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2008, respectively. In general, these borrowings
were unsecured and matured on the following business day. As already noted, offshore branch
deposits and brokered certificates of deposit have been used by the Company as alternatives to
short-term borrowings. Offshore branch deposits also generally mature on the next business day and
totaled $1.1 billion at June 30, 2009, $5.8 billion at June 30, 2008 and $4.0 billion at December
31, 2008. Outstanding brokered time deposits at June 30, 2009, June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2008
were $1.2 billion, $1.5 billion and $487 million, respectively. Such deposits at June 30, 2009
included $1.1 billion of brokered time deposits obtained in the acquisition of Provident. At June
30, 2009, the weighted-average remaining term to maturity of brokered time deposits was 23 months.
Certain of these brokered time deposits have provisions that allow for early redemption.
- 55 -
The Companys ability to obtain funding from these or other sources could be negatively
impacted should the Company experience a substantial deterioration in its financial condition or
its debt ratings, or should the availability of short-term funding become restricted due to a
disruption in the financial markets. The Company attempts to quantify such credit-event risk by
modeling scenarios that estimate the liquidity impact resulting from a short-term ratings downgrade
over various grading levels. Such impact is estimated by attempting to measure the effect on
available unsecured lines of credit, available capacity from secured borrowing sources and
securitizable assets. In addition to deposits and borrowings, other sources of liquidity include
maturities of investment securities and other earning assets, repayments of loans and investment
securities, and cash generated from operations, such as fees collected for services.
Certain customers of the Company obtain financing through the issuance of variable rate demand
bonds (VRDBs). The VRDBs are generally enhanced by letters of credit provided by M&T Bank. M&T
Bank oftentimes acts as remarketing agent for the VRDBs and, at its discretion, may from
time-to-time own some of the VRDBs while such instruments are remarketed. When this occurs, the
VRDBs are classified as trading assets in the Companys consolidated balance sheet. Nevertheless,
M&T Bank is not contractually obligated to purchase the VRDBs. The value of VRDBs in the Companys
trading account totaled $74 million and $21 million at June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, and
$29 million at December 31, 2008. The total amount of VRDBs outstanding backed by M&T Bank letters
of credit was $1.9 billion at each of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, compared with $1.7
billion at June 30, 2008. M&T Bank also serves as remarketing agent for most of those bonds.
The Company enters into contractual obligations in the normal course of business which require
future cash payments. Such obligations include, among others, payments related to deposits,
borrowings, leases and other contractual commitments. Off-balance sheet commitments to customers
may impact liquidity, including commitments to extend credit, standby letters of credit, commercial
letters of credit, financial guarantees and indemnification contracts, and commitments to sell real
estate loans. Because many of these commitments or contracts expire without being funded in whole
or in part, the contract amounts are not necessarily indicative of future cash flows. Further
information relating to these commitments is provided in note 11 of Notes to Financial Statements.
M&Ts primary source of funds to pay for operating expenses, shareholder dividends and
treasury stock repurchases has historically been the receipt of dividends from its banking
subsidiaries, which are subject to various regulatory limitations. Dividends from any banking
subsidiary to M&T are limited by the amount of earnings of the banking subsidiary in the current
year and the two preceding years. For purposes of that test, at June 30, 2009 approximately $863
million was available for payment of dividends to M&T from banking subsidiaries without prior
regulatory approval. These historic sources of cash flow have been augmented in the past by the
issuance of trust preferred securities and senior notes payable. Information regarding trust
preferred securities and the related junior subordinated debentures is included in note 4 of Notes
to Financial Statements. M&T also maintains a $30 million line of credit with an unaffiliated
commercial bank, of which there were no borrowings outstanding at June 30, 2009 or at December 31,
2008.
Management closely monitors the Companys liquidity position on an ongoing basis for
compliance with internal policies and believes that available sources of liquidity are adequate to
meet funding needs anticipated in the normal course of business. Management does not anticipate
engaging in any activities, either currently or in the long-term, for which adequate funding would
not be available and would therefore result in a significant strain on liquidity at either M&T or
its subsidiary banks.
- 56 -
Market risk is the risk of loss from adverse changes in the market prices and/or interest
rates of the Companys financial instruments. The primary market risk the Company is exposed to is
interest rate risk. Interest rate risk arises from the Companys core banking activities of
lending and deposit-taking, because assets and liabilities reprice at different times and by
different amounts as interest rates change. As a result, net interest income earned by the Company
is subject to the effects of changing interest rates. The Company measures interest rate risk by
calculating the variability of net interest income in future periods under various interest rate
scenarios using projected balances for earning assets, interest-bearing liabilities and derivatives
used to hedge interest rate risk. Managements philosophy toward interest rate risk management is
to limit the variability of net interest income. The balances of financial instruments used in the
projections are based on expected growth from forecasted business opportunities, anticipated
prepayments of loans and investment securities, and expected maturities of investment securities,
loans and deposits. Management uses a value of equity model to supplement the modeling technique
described above. Those supplemental analyses are based on discounted cash flows associated with
on- and off-balance sheet financial instruments. Such analyses are modeled to reflect changes in
interest rates and provide management with a long-term interest rate risk metric.
The Companys Risk Management Committee, which includes members of senior management, monitors
the sensitivity of the Companys net interest income to changes in interest rates with the aid of a
computer model that forecasts net interest income under different interest rate scenarios. In
modeling changing interest rates, the Company considers different yield curve shapes that consider
both parallel (that is, simultaneous changes in interest rates at each point on the yield curve)
and non-parallel (that is, allowing interest rates at points on the yield curve to vary by
different amounts) shifts in the yield curve. In utilizing the model, market-implied forward
interest rates over the subsequent twelve months are generally used to determine a base interest
rate scenario for the net interest income simulation. That calculated base net interest income is
then compared to the income calculated under the varying interest rate scenarios. The model
considers the impact of ongoing lending and deposit-gathering activities, as well as
interrelationships in the magnitude and timing of the repricing of financial instruments, including
the effect of changing interest rates on expected prepayments and maturities. When deemed prudent,
management has taken actions to mitigate exposure to interest rate risk through the use of on- or
off-balance sheet financial instruments and intends to do so in the future. Possible actions
include, but are not limited to, changes in the pricing of loan and deposit products, modifying the
composition of earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, and adding to, modifying or
terminating existing interest rate swap agreements or other financial instruments used for interest
rate risk management purposes.
The accompanying table as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 displays the estimated impact
on net interest income from non-trading financial instruments in the base scenario described above
resulting from parallel changes in interest rates across repricing categories during the first
modeling year.
SENSITIVITY OF NET INTEREST INCOME
TO CHANGES IN INTEREST RATES
Dollars in thousands
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calculated increase (decrease) |
|
|
in projected net interest income |
Changes in interest rates |
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
December 31, 2008 |
+200 basis points |
|
$ |
46,496 |
|
|
|
33,516 |
|
+100 basis points |
|
|
24,869 |
|
|
|
9,726 |
|
-100 basis points |
|
|
(17,866 |
) |
|
|
(33,281 |
) |
-200 basis points |
|
|
(25,686 |
) |
|
|
(34,177 |
) |
- 57 -
The Company utilized many assumptions to calculate the impact that changes in interest rates
may have on net interest income. The more significant of those assumptions included the rate of
prepayments of mortgage-related assets, cash flows from derivative and other financial instruments
held for non-trading purposes, loan and deposit volumes and pricing, and deposit maturities. In
the scenarios presented, the Company also assumed gradual changes in interest rates during a
twelve-month period of 100 and 200 basis points, as compared with the assumed base scenario. In
the event that a 100 or 200 basis point rate change cannot be achieved, the applicable rate changes
are limited to lesser amounts such that interest rates cannot be less than zero. The assumptions
used in interest rate sensitivity modeling are inherently uncertain and, as a result, the Company
cannot precisely predict the impact of changes in interest rates on net interest income. Actual
results may differ significantly from those presented due to the timing, magnitude and frequency of
changes in interest rates and changes in market conditions and interest rate differentials
(spreads) between maturity/repricing categories, as well as any actions, such as those previously
described, which management may take to counter such changes. In light of the uncertainties and
assumptions associated with the process, the amounts presented in the table are not considered
significant to the Companys past or projected net interest income.
Changes in fair value of the Companys financial instruments can also result from a lack of
trading activity for similar instruments in the financial markets. That impact is most notable on
the values assigned to the Companys investment securities. Information about the fair valuation
of such securities is presented herein under the heading Capital and in notes 3 and 10 of Notes
to Financial Statements.
The Company engages in trading activities to meet the financial needs of customers, to fund
the Companys obligations under certain deferred compensation plans and, to a limited extent, to
profit from perceived market opportunities. Financial instruments utilized in trading activities
consist predominantly of interest rate contracts, such as swap agreements, and forward and futures
contracts related to foreign currencies, but have also included forward and futures contracts
related to mortgage-backed securities and investments in U.S. Treasury and other government
securities, mortgage-backed securities and mutual funds, and as previously described, a limited
number of VRDBs. The Company generally mitigates the foreign currency and interest rate risk
associated with trading activities by entering into offsetting trading positions. The amounts of
gross and net trading positions, as well as the type of trading activities conducted by the
Company, are subject to a well-defined series of potential loss exposure limits established by
management and approved by M&Ts Board of Directors. However, as with any non-government
guaranteed financial instrument, the Company is exposed to credit risk associated with
counterparties to the Companys trading activities.
The notional amounts of interest rate contracts entered into for trading purposes totaled
$14.9 billion at June 30, 2009, compared with $13.5 billion and $14.6 billion at June 30, 2008 and
December 31, 2008, respectively. The notional amounts of foreign currency and other option and
futures contracts entered into for trading purposes aggregated $681 million, $973 million and $713
million at June 30, 2009, June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2008, respectively. Although the notional
amounts of these trading contracts are not recorded in the consolidated balance sheet, the fair
values of all financial instruments used for trading activities are recorded in the consolidated
balance sheet. The fair values of all trading account assets and liabilities totaled $495 million
and $354 million, respectively, at June 30, 2009, $243 million and $148 million, respectively, at
June 30, 2008, and $618 million and $521 million, respectively, at December 31, 2008. The rise in
the fair value of both trading assets and trading liabilities at June 30, 2009 and December 31,
2008 as compared with June 30, 2008 was largely due to the impact of lower interest rates on the
fair values of interest rate swap
- 58 -
agreements held in the trading portfolio. Included in trading account assets were assets
related to deferred compensation plans totaling $31 million at June 30, 2009, $43 million at June
30, 2008 and $33 million at December 31, 2008. Changes in the fair value of such assets are
recorded as trading account and foreign exchange gains in the consolidated statement of income.
Included in other liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet at June 30, 2009 were $35 million
of liabilities related to deferred compensation plans, while at June 30, 2008 and at December 31,
2008, $45 million and $38 million, respectively, of such liabilities related to deferred
compensation plans. Changes in the balances of such liabilities due to the valuation of allocated
investment options to which the liabilities are indexed are recorded in other costs of operations
in the consolidated statement of income.
Given the Companys policies, limits and positions, management believes that the potential
loss exposure to the Company resulting from market risk associated with trading activities was not
material, however, as previously noted, the Company is exposed to credit risk associated with
counterparties to transactions related to the Companys trading activities. Additional information
about the Companys use of derivative financial instruments in its trading activities is included
in note 9 of Notes to Financial Statements.
Provision for Credit Losses
The Company maintains an allowance for credit losses that in managements judgment is adequate to
absorb losses inherent in the loan and lease portfolio. A provision for credit losses is recorded
to adjust the level of the allowance as deemed necessary by management. The provision for credit
losses in the second quarter of 2009 was $147 million, compared with $100 million in the
year-earlier quarter and $158 million in the first quarter of 2009. For the six-month periods
ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, the provision for credit losses was $305 million and $160 million,
respectively. The higher levels of the provision in the 2009 periods as compared with the 2008
periods reflect a pronounced downturn in the residential real estate market and the deteriorating
state of the U.S. economy, which has been in recession since late-2007.
As already noted, loans acquired in connection with the Provident transaction were recorded at
fair value with no carry over of Providents previously recorded allowance for credit losses.
Determining the fair value of the acquired loans required estimating cash flows expected to be
collected on the loans and discounting those cash flows at current interest rates. The excess of
cash flows expected at acquisition over the estimated fair value is recognized as interest income
over the remaining lives of the loans. The difference between contractually required payments at
acquisition and the cash flows expected to be collected at acquisition reflects estimated future
credit losses and other contractually required payments that the Company does not expect to
collect. Subsequent decreases to the expected cash flows will require the Company to evaluate the
need for an additional allowance for credit losses and could lead to charge-offs of acquired loan
balances. Subsequent increases in expected cash flows will result in additional interest income to
be recognized over the then remaining lives of the loans.
Net loan charge-offs were $138 million in the second quarter of 2009, compared with $99
million in the year-earlier quarter and $100 million in the initial 2009 quarter. Net charge-offs
as an annualized percentage of average loans and leases were 1.09% in the recent quarter, compared
with .81% and .83% in the quarters ended June 30, 2008 and March 31, 2009, respectively. Net
charge-offs for the six-month period ended June 30 aggregated $238 million in 2009 and $145 million
in 2008, representing .96% and .59%, respectively, of average loans and leases. A summary of net
chargeoffs by loan type follows.
- 59 -
NET CHARGE-OFFS
BY LOAN/LEASE TYPE
In thousands
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year |
|
|
|
1st Qtr. |
|
|
2nd Qtr. |
|
|
to-date |
|
Commercial, financial, etc. |
|
$ |
22,301 |
|
|
|
48,025 |
|
|
|
70,326 |
|
Real estate: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
22,399 |
|
|
|
27,511 |
|
|
|
49,910 |
|
Residential |
|
|
19,702 |
|
|
|
31,460 |
|
|
|
51,162 |
|
Consumer |
|
|
35,531 |
|
|
|
30,610 |
|
|
|
66,141 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
99,933 |
|
|
|
137,606 |
|
|
|
237,539 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year |
|
|
|
1st Qtr. |
|
|
2nd Qtr. |
|
|
to-date |
|
Commercial, financial, etc. |
|
$ |
4,377 |
|
|
|
20,284 |
|
|
|
24,661 |
|
Real estate: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
4,380 |
|
|
|
39,559 |
|
|
|
43,939 |
|
Residential |
|
|
15,097 |
|
|
|
12,490 |
|
|
|
27,587 |
|
Consumer |
|
|
21,961 |
|
|
|
26,888 |
|
|
|
48,849 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
45,815 |
|
|
|
99,221 |
|
|
|
145,036 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net charge-offs of commercial loans and leases in the recent quarter reflect a $33 million
partial charge-off of an unsecured loan to a single customer in the commercial real estate sector.
That charge-off amount was determined by reference to bid prices for debt instruments issued by
that customer. Included in net charge-offs of commercial real estate loans were net charge-offs of
loans to residential homebuilders and developers of $17 million, $38 million and $22 million for
the quarters ended June 30, 2009, June 30, 2008 and March 31, 2009, respectively. Included in net
charge-offs of residential real estate loans were net charge-offs of Alt-A first mortgage loans of
$14 million in the second quarter of 2009, compared with $10 million and $13 million during the
quarters ended June 30, 2008 and March 31, 2009, respectively. Also reflected in residential real
estate loan charge-offs were charge-offs of construction loans of $12 million in the second quarter
of 2009, compared with $1 million in each of the quarters ended June 30, 2008 and March 31, 2009.
That recent quarter increase reflected updated property appraisals and the delinquency status of
the loans. It is the Companys policy to charge off the excess of residential real estate loan
balances over the net realizable value of the property collateralizing the loan when a loan is 150
days delinquent. Included in net charge-offs of consumer loans and leases were net charge-offs
during the quarters ended June 30, 2009, June 30, 2008 and March 31, 2009, respectively, of:
indirect automobile loans of $14 million, $11 million and $17 million; recreational vehicle loans
of $6 million, $5 million and $7 million; and home equity loans and lines of credit, including
Alt-A second lien loans, of $9 million in each of the those three-month periods. Including both
first and second lien mortgages, net charge-offs of Alt-A loans totaled $16 million in each of the
two most recent quarters, and $15 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2008.
Nonaccrual loans totaled $1.1 billion or 2.11% of total loans and leases outstanding at June
30, 2009, compared with $568 million or 1.16% at June 30, 2008, $755 million or 1.54% at December
31, 2008, and $1.0 billion or 2.05% at March 31, 2009. Major factors contributing to the rise in
nonaccrual loans from June 30, 2008 were an $83 million increase in residential real estate loans,
a $124 million rise in loans to builders and developers of residential real estate, and a $204
million increase in commercial loans and leases. The continuing turbulence in the residential
- 60 -
real estate market place has resulted in deteriorating real estate values and increased
delinquencies, both for loans to consumers and loans to builders and developers of residential real
estate. Additionally, the recessionary state of the U.S. economy has resulted in generally higher
levels of nonaccrual loans. The rise in nonaccrual loans from December 31, 2008 to June 30, 2009
was largely due to a $27 million increase in residential real estate loans; a $129 million increase
in commercial real estate loans, including a $76 million increase in loans to residential real
estate builders and developers; and a $180 million increase in commercial loans, including $74
million to a single borrower that operates retirement communities.
Accruing loans past due 90 days or more were $155 million or .29% of total loans and leases at
June 30, 2009, compared with $94 million or .19% a year earlier, $159 million or .32% at December
31, 2008 and $143 million or .29% at March 31, 2009. Those loans included $144 million, $89
million, $114 million and $127 million at June 30, 2009, June 30, 2008, December 31, 2008 and March
31, 2009, respectively, of loans guaranteed by government-related entities. Such guaranteed loans
included one-to-four family residential mortgage loans serviced by the Company that were
repurchased to reduce servicing costs, including a requirement to advance principal and interest
payments that had not been received from individual mortgagors. Despite the loans being purchased
by the Company, the insurance or guarantee by the applicable government-related entity remains in
force. The outstanding principal balances of the repurchased loans are fully guaranteed by
governmentrelated entities and totaled $138 million, $78 million, $108 million and $122 million at
June 30, 2009, June 30, 2008, December 31, 2008 and March 31, 2009, respectively. Loans past due
90 days or more and accruing interest that were guaranteed by government-related entities also
included foreign commercial and industrial loans supported by the Export-Import Bank of the United
States that totaled $3 million at each of March 31 and June 30, 2009, compared with $10 million at
June 30, 2008 and $5 million at December 31, 2008.
Acquired impaired loans accounted for in accordance with Statement of Position 03-3 are also
generally delinquent in payments, but the Company continues to accrue interest income on such loans
based on the estimated expected cash flows associated with the loans. The carrying amount of such
loans was $98 million at June 30, 2009, or approximately .2% of total loans.
In an effort to assist borrowers, the Company modified the terms of select loans secured by
residential real estate. The modified loans were largely from the Companys portfolio of Alt-A
loans and aggregated $259 million at June 30, 2009. Of that total, $107 million of such loans were
included in nonaccrual loans at June 30, 2009. After a period of demonstrated performance, those
loans may begin to accrue interest. The remaining $152 million of modified residential real estate
loans have demonstrated payment capability consistent with the modified terms and, accordingly,
were classified as renegotiated loans and were accruing interest at June 30, 2009. Loan
modifications included such actions as the extension of loan maturity dates (generally from thirty
to forty years) and the lowering of interest rates and monthly payments. The objective of the
modifications was to increase loan repayments by customers and thereby reduce net charge-offs. In
accordance with GAAP, the modified loans are included in impaired loans for purposes of determining
the allowance for credit losses. Modified residential real estate loans totaled $162 million as of
December 31, 2008, of which $93 million were in nonaccrual status and $69 million were classified
as renegotiated loans and were accruing interest at that date.
- 61 -
Commercial loans and leases classified as nonaccrual aggregated $294 million at June 30, 2009,
$90 million at June 30, 2008, $114 million at December 31, 2008 and $236 million at March 31, 2009.
The rise in such loans in 2009 reflects a $74 million relationship to a single borrower that
operates retirement communities and a $48 million loan to a single customer in the commercial real
estate sector.
Nonaccrual commercial real estate loans totaled $448 million at June 30, 2009, $227 million at
June 30, 2008, $319 million at December 31, 2008 and $396 million at March 31, 2009. The rise in
such loans at June 30, 2009 as compared with the end of 2008s second quarter includes the addition
of $124 million of loans to residential homebuilders and developers, reflecting the impact of the
downturn in the residential real estate market, including declining real estate values. The
increase from the end of 2008 to June 30, 2009 was due, in part, to the net addition of $76 million
of loans to residential homebuilders and developers. Information about the location of nonaccrual
and chargedoff loans to residential real estate builders and developers as of and for the
three-month period ended June 30, 2009 is presented in the accompanying table.
RESIDENTIAL BUILDER AND DEVELOPER LOANS, NET OF UNEARNED DISCOUNT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter ended |
|
|
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonaccrual |
|
|
Net charge-offs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annualized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
percent of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
average |
|
|
|
Outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
outstanding |
|
|
|
balances |
|
|
Balances |
|
|
balances |
|
|
Balances |
|
|
balances |
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
New York |
|
$ |
611,465 |
|
|
$ |
17,233 |
|
|
|
2.82 |
% |
|
$ |
120 |
|
|
|
0.08 |
% |
Pennsylvania |
|
|
249,338 |
|
|
|
7,198 |
|
|
|
2.89 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mid-Atlantic |
|
|
982,941 |
|
|
|
188,668 |
|
|
|
19.19 |
|
|
|
15,806 |
|
|
|
8.30 |
|
Other |
|
|
285,117 |
|
|
|
72,300 |
|
|
|
25.36 |
|
|
|
1,409 |
|
|
|
1.64 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
2,128,861 |
|
|
$ |
285,399 |
|
|
|
13.41 |
% |
|
$ |
17,335 |
|
|
|
3.47 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential real estate loans classified as nonaccrual were $283 million at June 30, 2009,
$200 million at June 30, 2008, $256 million at December 31, 2008 and $298 million at March 31,
2009. Declining property values and higher levels of delinquencies have contributed to the rise in
residential real estate loans classified as nonaccrual and to the level of charge-offs, largely in
the Companys Alt-A loans. Included in residential real estate loans classified as nonaccrual were
Alt-A loans, which totaled $124 million, $106 million, $125 million and $138 million at June 30,
2009, June 30, 2008, December 31, 2008 and March 31, 2009, respectively. Residential real estate
loans past due 90 days or more and accruing interest totaled $138 million at June 30, 2009,
compared with $78 million a year-earlier, and $108 million and $122 million at December 31, 2008
and March 31, 2009, respectively. A substantial portion of such amounts relate to guaranteed loans
repurchased from government-related
- 62 -
entities. Information about the location of nonaccrual and chargedoff residential real estate
loans as of and for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 is presented in the accompanying table.
SELECTED RESIDENTIAL REAL ESTATE-RELATED LOAN DATA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter ended |
|
|
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonaccrual |
|
|
Net charge-offs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annualized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
percent of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
average |
|
|
|
Outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
outstanding |
|
|
|
balances |
|
|
Balances |
|
|
balances |
|
|
Balances |
|
|
balances |
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
Residential mortgages: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New York |
|
$ |
1,785,359 |
|
|
$ |
33,770 |
|
|
|
1.89 |
% |
|
$ |
909 |
|
|
|
.22 |
% |
Pennsylvania |
|
|
595,820 |
|
|
|
11,469 |
|
|
|
1.92 |
|
|
|
317 |
|
|
|
.22 |
|
Mid-Atlantic |
|
|
894,822 |
|
|
|
36,084 |
|
|
|
4.03 |
|
|
|
2,073 |
|
|
|
1.01 |
|
Other |
|
|
1,215,954 |
|
|
|
53,075 |
|
|
|
4.36 |
|
|
|
2,686 |
|
|
|
.91 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
4,491,955 |
|
|
$ |
134,398 |
|
|
|
2.99 |
% |
|
$ |
5,985 |
|
|
|
.56 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential construction loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New York |
|
$ |
31,103 |
|
|
$ |
1,444 |
|
|
|
4.64 |
% |
|
$ |
630 |
|
|
|
7.60 |
% |
Pennsylvania |
|
|
14,610 |
|
|
|
1,898 |
|
|
|
12.99 |
|
|
|
238 |
|
|
|
5.31 |
|
Mid-Atlantic |
|
|
11,235 |
|
|
|
2,858 |
|
|
|
25.44 |
|
|
|
392 |
|
|
|
12.26 |
|
Other |
|
|
88,138 |
|
|
|
18,521 |
|
|
|
21.01 |
|
|
|
10,345 |
|
|
|
40.56 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
145,086 |
|
|
$ |
24,721 |
|
|
|
17.04 |
% |
|
$ |
11,605 |
|
|
|
27.98 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alt-A first mortgages: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New York |
|
$ |
116,411 |
|
|
$ |
14,120 |
|
|
|
12.13 |
% |
|
$ |
492 |
|
|
|
1.67 |
% |
Pennsylvania |
|
|
32,242 |
|
|
|
2,443 |
|
|
|
7.58 |
|
|
|
79 |
|
|
|
.95 |
|
Mid-Atlantic |
|
|
149,322 |
|
|
|
18,810 |
|
|
|
12.60 |
|
|
|
1,429 |
|
|
|
3.78 |
|
Other |
|
|
536,759 |
|
|
|
88,872 |
|
|
|
16.56 |
|
|
|
11,870 |
|
|
|
8.59 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
834,734 |
|
|
$ |
124,245 |
|
|
|
14.88 |
% |
|
$ |
13,870 |
|
|
|
6.49 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alt-A junior lien: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New York |
|
$ |
3,970 |
|
|
$ |
402 |
|
|
|
10.13 |
% |
|
$ |
75 |
|
|
|
7.44 |
% |
Pennsylvania |
|
|
1,240 |
|
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
6.21 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
7.59 |
|
Mid-Atlantic |
|
|
5,825 |
|
|
|
324 |
|
|
|
5.56 |
|
|
|
191 |
|
|
|
12.75 |
|
Other |
|
|
23,325 |
|
|
|
2,688 |
|
|
|
11.52 |
|
|
|
1,627 |
|
|
|
26.69 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
34,360 |
|
|
$ |
3,491 |
|
|
|
10.16 |
% |
|
$ |
1,917 |
|
|
|
21.48 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First lien home equity loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New York |
|
$ |
51,793 |
|
|
$ |
45 |
|
|
|
.09 |
% |
|
$ |
60 |
|
|
|
.45 |
% |
Pennsylvania |
|
|
289,987 |
|
|
|
1,935 |
|
|
|
.67 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mid-Atlantic |
|
|
207,183 |
|
|
|
2,168 |
|
|
|
1.05 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
4,038 |
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
1.21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
553,001 |
|
|
$ |
4,197 |
|
|
|
.76 |
% |
|
$ |
60 |
|
|
|
.05 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First lien home equity lines: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New York |
|
$ |
669,811 |
|
|
$ |
1,228 |
|
|
|
.18 |
% |
|
$ |
120 |
|
|
|
.07 |
% |
Pennsylvania |
|
|
457,539 |
|
|
|
796 |
|
|
|
.17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mid-Atlantic |
|
|
484,187 |
|
|
|
203 |
|
|
|
.04 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
13,562 |
|
|
|
143 |
|
|
|
1.05 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,625,099 |
|
|
$ |
2,370 |
|
|
|
.15 |
% |
|
$ |
120 |
|
|
|
.03 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Junior lien home equity
loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New York |
|
$ |
137,618 |
|
|
$ |
1,103 |
|
|
|
.80 |
% |
|
$ |
309 |
|
|
|
.85 |
% |
Pennsylvania |
|
|
147,787 |
|
|
|
1,295 |
|
|
|
.88 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
.03 |
|
Mid-Atlantic |
|
|
217,291 |
|
|
|
1,137 |
|
|
|
.52 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
10,182 |
|
|
|
347 |
|
|
|
3.41 |
|
|
|
210 |
|
|
|
9.81 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
512,878 |
|
|
$ |
3,882 |
|
|
|
.76 |
% |
|
$ |
531 |
|
|
|
.47 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Junior lien home equity
lines: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New York |
|
$ |
1,859,016 |
|
|
$ |
10,052 |
|
|
|
.54 |
% |
|
$ |
2,723 |
|
|
|
.59 |
% |
Pennsylvania |
|
|
609,243 |
|
|
|
3,043 |
|
|
|
.50 |
|
|
|
339 |
|
|
|
.23 |
|
Mid-Atlantic |
|
|
1,552,725 |
|
|
|
9,976 |
|
|
|
.64 |
|
|
|
2,969 |
|
|
|
.96 |
|
Other |
|
|
84,041 |
|
|
|
1,012 |
|
|
|
1.20 |
|
|
|
303 |
|
|
|
1.57 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
4,105,025 |
|
|
$ |
24,083 |
|
|
|
.59 |
% |
|
$ |
6,334 |
|
|
|
.67 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonaccruing consumer loans and leases totaled $86 million at the recent quarter-end,
compared with $51 million a year earlier, $66 million at December 31, 2008 and $74 million at March
31, 2009. Included in nonaccrual
- 63 -
consumer loans and leases at June 30, 2009, June 30, 2008, December 31, 2008 and March 31,
2009 were indirect automobile loans of $28 million, $17 million, $21 million and $26 million,
respectively; recreational vehicle loans of $14 million, $11 million, $14 million and $14 million,
respectively; and outstanding balances of home equity loans and lines of credit, including Alt-A
second lien loans, of $38 million, $20 million, $29 million and $32 million, respectively.
Information about the location of nonaccrual and chargedoff home equity loans and lines of credit
as of and for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 is presented in the accompanying table.
Real estate and other foreclosed assets were $90 million at June 30, 2009, compared with $53
million at June 30, 2008 and $100 million at each of December 31, 2008 and March 31, 2009. The
increases from June 30, 2008 resulted from additions related to residential real estate development
projects. At June 30, 2009 the Companys holding of residential real estate-related properties
comprised 81% of foreclosed assets.
A comparative summary of nonperforming assets and certain past due loan data and credit
quality ratios as of the end of the periods indicated is presented in the accompanying table.
NONPERFORMING ASSET AND PAST DUE, RENEGOTIATED AND IMPAIRED LOAN DATA
Dollars in thousands
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 Quarters |
|
|
2008 Quarters |
|
|
|
Second |
|
|
First |
|
|
Fourth |
|
|
Third |
|
|
Second |
|
Nonaccrual loans |
|
$ |
1,111,423 |
|
|
|
1,003,987 |
|
|
|
755,397 |
|
|
|
688,214 |
|
|
|
568,460 |
|
Real estate and other
foreclosed assets |
|
|
90,461 |
|
|
|
100,270 |
|
|
|
99,617 |
|
|
|
85,305 |
|
|
|
52,606 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total nonperforming assets |
|
$ |
1,201,884 |
|
|
|
1,104,257 |
|
|
|
855,014 |
|
|
|
773,519 |
|
|
|
621,066 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accruing loans past due
90 days or more(a) |
|
$ |
155,125 |
|
|
|
142,842 |
|
|
|
158,991 |
|
|
|
96,206 |
|
|
|
93,894 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Renegotiated loans |
|
$ |
170,950 |
|
|
|
130,932 |
|
|
|
91,575 |
|
|
|
21,804 |
|
|
|
18,905 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchased impaired loans(b): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding customer
balance |
|
$ |
170,400 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying amount |
|
|
97,730 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Government guaranteed loans
included in totals above: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonaccrual loans |
|
$ |
38,075 |
|
|
|
38,460 |
|
|
|
32,506 |
|
|
|
30,075 |
|
|
|
24,658 |
|
Accruing loans past
due 90 days or more |
|
|
143,886 |
|
|
|
127,237 |
|
|
|
114,183 |
|
|
|
89,945 |
|
|
|
89,163 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonaccrual loans
to total loans and leases,
net of unearned discount |
|
|
2.11 |
% |
|
|
2.05 |
% |
|
|
1.54 |
% |
|
|
1.41 |
% |
|
|
1.16 |
% |
Nonperforming assets
to total net loans and
leases and real estate
and other foreclosed assets |
|
|
2.28 |
% |
|
|
2.25 |
% |
|
|
1.74 |
% |
|
|
1.59 |
% |
|
|
1.26 |
% |
Accruing loans past due
90 days or more to total
loans and leases, net of
unearned discount |
|
|
.29 |
% |
|
|
.29 |
% |
|
|
.32 |
% |
|
|
.20 |
% |
|
|
.19 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Predominantly residential mortgage loans. |
|
(b) |
|
Held for investment and accounted for in accordance with SOP 03-3. |
- 64 -
Management regularly assesses the adequacy of the allowance for credit losses by performing
ongoing evaluations of the loan and lease portfolio, including such factors as the differing
economic risks associated with each loan category, the financial condition of specific borrowers,
the economic environment in which borrowers operate, the level of delinquent loans, the value of
any collateral and, where applicable, the existence of any guarantees or indemnifications.
Management evaluated the impact of changes in interest rates and overall economic conditions on the
ability of borrowers to meet repayment obligations when quantifying the Companys exposure to
credit losses and assessing the adequacy of the Companys allowance for such losses as of each
reporting date. Factors also considered by management when performing its assessment, in addition
to general economic conditions and the other factors described above, included, but were not
limited to: (i) the impact of declining residential real estate values in the Companys portfolio
of loans to residential real estate builders and developers; (ii) the repayment performance
associated with the Companys portfolio of Alt-A residential mortgage loans; (iii) the
concentration of commercial real estate loans in the Companys loan portfolio, particularly the
large concentration of loans secured by properties in New York State, in general, and in the New
York City metropolitan area, in particular; (iv) the amount of commercial and industrial loans to
businesses in areas of New York State outside of the New York City metropolitan area and in central
Pennsylvania that have historically experienced less economic growth and vitality than the vast
majority of other regions of the country; and (v) the size of the Companys portfolio of loans to
individual consumers, which historically have experienced higher net charge-offs as a percentage of
loans outstanding than other loan types. The level of the allowance is adjusted based on the
results of managements analysis.
Management cautiously and conservatively evaluated the allowance for credit losses as of June
30, 2009 in light of (i) lower residential real estate values and higher levels of delinquencies of
residential real estate loans; (ii) the declining pace of economic growth in many of the markets
served by the Company; (iii) continuing weakness in industrial employment in upstate New York and
central Pennsylvania; (iv) the significant subjectivity involved in commercial real estate
valuations for properties located in areas with stagnant or low growth economies; and (v) the
amount of loan growth experienced by the Company. Considerable concerns exist about the economic
downturn in both national and international markets; the level and volatility of energy prices; a
weakened housing market; the troubled state of financial and credit markets; Federal Reserve
positioning of monetary policy; rising private sector layoffs and unemployment, which has caused
consumer spending to slow; the underlying impact on businesses operations and abilities to repay
loans as consumer spending slowed; continued stagnant population growth in the upstate New York and
central Pennsylvania regions; and reduced domestic automobile sales. The U.S. economy has been in
recession since late-2007, however, as compared with other areas of the country, the impact of
deteriorating national market conditions was not as pronounced on borrowers in the traditionally
slower growth or stagnant regions of upstate New York and central Pennsylvania. Approximately
two-thirds of the Companys loans are to customers in New York State and Pennsylvania, including a
large portion to customers in upstate New York and central Pennsylvania. Home prices in upstate
New York and central Pennsylvania increased in 2008, in sharp contrast to steep declines in values
in other regions of the country. Therefore, despite the conditions, as previously described, the
most severe credit issues experienced by the Company have been centered around residential real
estate, including loans to builders and developers of residential real estate in areas other than
New York State and Pennsylvania. In response, throughout 2008 and 2009 the Company has conducted
detailed reviews of all loans to residential real estate builders and developers that exceeded
$2.5 million. Those credit reviews often resulted in adjustments to loan grades and, if
appropriate, commencement of intensified collection efforts, including foreclosure. With regard to
residential real estate loans, with special emphasis on the portfolio of Alt-A mortgage loans, the
Company
- 65 -
expanded its collections and loan work-out staff and further refined its loss identification
and estimation techniques by reference to loan performance and house price depreciation data in
specific areas of the country where collateral that was securing the Companys residential real
estate loans was located. During the first two quarters of 2009, the Company has also experienced
increases in nonaccrual commercial loans, largely the result of a small number of large
relationships.
Factors that influence the Companys credit loss experience include overall economic
conditions affecting businesses and consumers generally, such as those described above, but also
residential and commercial real estate valuations, in particular, given the size of the real estate
loan portfolios. Reflecting the factors and conditions as described herein, through June 30, 2009
the more significant increases in nonaccrual loans and net charge-offs of real estate-related loans
have been in the Companys portfolios of residential real estate loans, including second lien Alt-A
mortgage loans, and commercial real estate loans, including loans to builders and developers of
residential real estate. Commercial real estate valuations can be highly subjective, as they are
based upon many assumptions. Such valuations can be significantly affected over relatively short
periods of time by changes in business climate, economic conditions, interest rates and, in many
cases, the results of operations of businesses and other occupants of the real property.
Similarly, residential real estate valuations can be impacted by housing trends, the availability
of financing at reasonable interest rates, and general economic conditions affecting consumers.
Management believes that the allowance for credit losses at June 30, 2009 was adequate to
absorb credit losses inherent in the portfolio as of that date. The allowance for credit losses was
$855 million, or 1.62% of total loans and leases at June 30, 2009, compared with $774 million or
1.58% a year earlier, $788 million or 1.61% at December 31, 2008 and $846 million or 1.73% at March
31, 2009. The decline in the ratio of the allowance to total loans from March 31 to June 30, 2009
reflects the addition of $4.0 billion of loans obtained in the acquisition of Provident that have
been recorded at estimated fair value that is based on estimated future cash flows expected to be
received on those loans. As a result, and as required by GAAP, there was no carry over of the
allowance previously recorded by Provident. The allowance for credit losses at June 30, 2009 as a
percentage of the Companys legacy loans (that is, total loans excluding loans acquired in the
Provident transaction on May 23, 2009) was 1.76%. The level of the allowance reflects managements
evaluation of the loan and lease portfolio as described herein. Should the various credit factors
considered by management in establishing the allowance for credit losses change and should
managements assessment of losses inherent in the loan portfolio also change, the level of the
allowance as a percentage of loans could increase or decrease in future periods. The ratio of the
allowance for credit losses to nonaccrual loans was 77% at June 30, 2009, compared with 136% a year
earlier, 104% at December 31, 2008 and 84% at March 31, 2009. Given the Companys general position
as a secured lender and its practice of charging off loan balances when collection is deemed
doubtful, that ratio and changes in that ratio are generally not an indicative measure of the
adequacy of the Companys allowance for credit losses, nor does management rely upon that ratio in
assessing the adequacy of the allowance. The level of the allowance reflects managements
evaluation of the loan and lease portfolio as of each respective date.
Other Income
Other income totaled $272 million in the second quarter of 2009, little changed from $271 million
in the year-earlier quarter, but 17% higher than $232 million in the first quarter of 2009.
Reflected in such income were net losses on investment securities (including other-than-temporary
impairment losses), which totaled to $24 million in the recent quarter, $5 million in
- 66 -
the second quarter of 2008 and $32 million in the first quarter of 2009. Other-than-temporary
impairment charges of $25 million were recognized in the recent quarter related to certain of the
Companys privately issued CMOs and CDOs. In the initial 2009 quarter, other-than-temporary
impairment losses of $32 million were recorded on certain of the Companys privately issued CMO
holdings, and in the second quarter of 2008, other-than-temporary impairment losses of $6 million
were recorded on one privately issued CMO. Excluding gains and losses on bank investment
securities (including other-than-temporary impairment losses), other income aggregated $296 million
in the second quarter of 2009, compared with $277 million and $264 million in the second quarter of
2008 and first quarter of 2009, respectively. Contributing to the rise in such income from the
year-earlier period were significantly higher residential mortgage banking revenues and lower
losses relating to M&Ts pro-rata portion of the operating results of Bayview Lending Group LLC
(BLG). Partially offsetting those positive factors were declines in trust income and fees for
providing brokerage services, each largely due to depressed market conditions. As compared with
2009s first quarter, higher service charges on deposit accounts, trading account and foreign
exchange gains, credit-related fees and insurance income were significant contributors to the
recent quarters higher level of other income.
Mortgage banking revenues were $53 million in the recent quarter, up 39% from $38 million in
the corresponding quarter of 2008, but down 6% from $56 million in the initial quarter of 2009.
Mortgage banking revenues are comprised of both residential and commercial mortgage banking
activities. The Companys involvement in commercial mortgage banking activities includes the
origination, sales and servicing of loans under the multifamily loan programs of Fannie Mae, the
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (Freddie Mac) and the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban
Development.
Residential mortgage banking revenues, consisting of realized gains from sales of residential
mortgage loans and loan servicing rights, unrealized gains and losses on residential mortgage loans
held for sale and related commitments, residential mortgage loan servicing fees, and other
residential mortgage loan-related fees and income, were $42 million in the recent quarter, compared
with $27 million in the year-earlier period and $48 million in the first quarter of 2009. The
significantly higher revenues in the two most recent quarters as compared with the second quarter
of 2008 were attributable to sharply higher origination activity, due predominantly to refinancing
of loans by consumers in response to relatively low interest rates, and wider margins associated
with that activity. The decline in residential mortgage banking revenues in the recent quarter as
compared with the first quarter of 2009 was due, in part, to the impact of a higher interest rate
environment for residential mortgage loans in the latter part of the recent quarter.
Residential mortgage loans originated for sale to other investors were approximately $1.8
billion in the recent quarter, compared with $1.2 billion and $1.7 billion during the three-month
periods ended June 30, 2008 and March 31, 2009, respectively. Residential mortgage loans sold to
investors totaled $1.9 billion in 2009s second quarter, compared with $1.3 billion in each of the
second quarter of 2008 and the first quarter of 2009. Realized gains from sales of residential
mortgage loans and loan servicing rights and recognized net unrealized gains and losses
attributable to residential mortgage loans held for sale, commitments to originate loans for sale
and commitments to sell loans totaled to a gain of $20 million in the recent quarter, compared with
gains of $6 million in the second quarter of 2008 and $27 million in the first quarter of 2009.
Revenues from servicing residential mortgage loans for others were $21 million in the recent
quarter, compared with $20 million in each of the quarters ended June 30, 2008 and March 31, 2009.
Included in servicing revenues were amounts related to purchased servicing rights associated with
small balance commercial mortgage loans which totaled $8 million in the recent quarter, compared
with $7 million in each of the second quarter of 2008 and the initial 2009 quarter.
- 67 -
Residential mortgage loans serviced for others totaled $21.2 billion at June 30, 2009,
compared with $21.0 billion at each of June 30, 2008 and March 31, 2009, including the small
balance commercial mortgage loans noted above of approximately $5.8 billion at each of June 30,
2009 and 2008, and $5.9 billion at March 31, 2009. Capitalized residential mortgage servicing
assets, net of a valuation allowance for impairment, were $148 million at June 30, 2009, compared
with $173 million a year earlier, $139 million at March 31, 2009 and $143 million at December 31,
2008. The valuation allowance for possible impairment of residential mortgage servicing assets
totaled $4 million, $2 million, $17 million and $22 million at June 30, 2009, June 30, 2008, March
31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively. Included in capitalized residential mortgage
servicing assets were $49 million at June 30, 2009, $64 million at June 30, 2008, $53 million at
March 31, 2009 and $58 million at December 31, 2008 of purchased servicing rights associated with
the small balance commercial mortgage loans noted above. Servicing rights for the small balance
commercial mortgage loans were purchased from BLG or its affiliates. In addition, at June 30,
2009, capitalized servicing rights included $22 million for servicing rights for $4.3 billion of
residential real estate loans that were purchased from affiliates of BLG. Additional information
about the Companys relationship with BLG and its affiliates is provided in note 13 of Notes to
Financial Statements.
Loans held for sale that are secured by residential real estate totaled $720 million at June
30, 2009, $612 million at June 30, 2008 and $352 million at December 31, 2008. Commitments to sell
loans and commitments to originate loans for sale at pre-determined rates were $1.3 billion and
$910 million, respectively, at June 30, 2009, $671 million and $477 million, respectively, at June
30, 2008, and $898 million and $871 million, respectively, at December 31, 2008. Net unrealized
gains on residential mortgage loans held for sale, commitments to sell loans, and commitments to
originate loans for sale were $21 million at June 30, 2009 and $6 million at December 31, 2008,
respectively, compared with net unrealized losses of $5 million at June 30, 2008. Changes in such
net unrealized losses are recorded in mortgage banking revenues and resulted in net decreases in
revenues of $1 million and $3 million in the recent quarter and in the second quarter of 2008,
respectively, compared with a net increase of $15 million in the first quarter of 2009.
Commercial mortgage banking revenues were $11 million in each of the second quarters of 2009
and 2008, respectively, and $8 million in the first quarter of 2009. Included in such amounts were
revenues from loan origination and sales activities of $8 million in each of the second quarters of
2009 and 2008 and $5 million in the initial 2009 quarter. Commercial mortgage loan servicing
revenues were $3 million in each of the second quarters of 2009 and 2008 and the first quarter of
2009. Capitalized commercial mortgage servicing assets totaled $28 million and $23 million at June
30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, and $26 million at December 31, 2008. Commercial mortgage loans
serviced for other investors totaled $6.9 billion, $5.9 billion and $6.4 billion at June 30, 2009,
June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2008, respectively, and included $1.2 billion, $1.1 billion and $1.2
billion, respectively, of loan balances for which investors had recourse to the Company if such
balances are ultimately uncollectible. Commitments to sell commercial mortgage loans and
commitments to originate commercial mortgage loans for sale were $156 million and $75 million,
respectively, at June 30, 2009, $109 million and $68 million, respectively, at June 30, 2008 and
$408 million and $252 million, respectively, at December 31, 2008. Commercial mortgage loans held
for sale at June 30, 2009 and 2008 were $81 million and $41 million, respectively, and $156 million
at December 31, 2008.
Service charges on deposit accounts aggregated $112 million in the second quarter of 2009,
compared with $110 million in the year-earlier quarter and $101 million in the first quarter of
2009. Reflected in the recent quarters total were $6 million of deposit service charges from the
Provident transaction. The remaining increase from the immediately preceding
- 68 -
quarter related to consumer deposit service charges and was due, in part, to lower seasonal
volume levels typically experienced in the first quarter of each year. Excluding the Provident
impact, the decline from the year-earlier quarter reflects lower consumer service charges related
to overdraft fees. Trust income totaled $32 million in the second quarter of 2009, compared with
$40 million and $35 million in last years second quarter and the first quarter of 2009,
respectively. The declines in trust income in the two most recent quarters as compared with the
second quarter of 2008 were largely attributable to lower fees for providing services that are
based on market values of assets under administration. Brokerage services income, which includes
revenues from the sale of mutual funds and annuities and securities brokerage fees, totaled $13
million and $17 million in the second quarters of 2009 and 2008, respectively, compared with $15
million in the first quarter of 2009. Trading account and foreign exchange activity resulted in
gains of $8 million and $7 million during the second quarters of 2009 and 2008, respectively, and
$1 million in the initial 2009 quarter. The higher revenues in the second quarters of 2009 and
2008 as compared with the initial 2009 quarter were largely attributable to improved investment
performance of assets held in conjunction with deferred compensation arrangements.
Including other-than-temporary impairment losses, during the second quarter of 2009, the
Company recognized losses on investment securities of $24 million, compared with losses of $5
million in the year-earlier quarter and losses of $32 million in the first quarter of 2009.
Other-than-temporary impairment charges of $25 million, $6 million and $32 million were recorded in
the quarters ended June 30, 2009, June 30, 2008 and March 31, 2009, respectively. Each reporting
period, the Company reviews its investment securities for other-than-temporary impairment. For
equity securities, such as the Companys investment in the preferred stock of Fannie Mae and
Freddie Mac, the Company considers various factors to determine if the decline in value is other
than temporary, including the duration and extent of the decline in value, the factors contributing
to the decline in fair value, including the financial condition of the issuer as well as the
conditions of the industry in which it operates, and the prospects for a recovery in fair value of
the equity security. For debt securities, the Company analyzes the creditworthiness of the issuer
or reviews the credit performance of the underlying collateral supporting the bond. For debt
securities backed by pools of loans, such as privately issued mortgage-backed securities, the
Company estimates the cash flows of the underlying loan collateral using forward-looking
assumptions of default rates, loss severities and prepayment speeds. Estimated collateral cash
flows are then utilized to estimate bond-specific cash flows to determine the ultimate
collectibility of the bond. If the present value of the cash flows indicates that the Company
should not expect to recover the entire amortized cost basis of a bond or if the Company intends to
sell the bond or it more likely than not will be required to sell the bond before recovery of its
amortized cost basis, an other-than-temporary impairment loss is recognized. If an
other-than-temporary impairment loss is deemed to have occurred, the investment securitys cost
basis is adjusted, as appropriate for the circumstances, by the amount of loss being recognized in
the consolidated statement of income.
M&Ts pro-rata share of the operating results of BLG in the recent quarter was a loss of $207
thousand, compared with losses of $13 million in the second quarter of 2008 and $4 million in the
first 2009 quarter. The operating losses of BLG in the respective quarters resulted from the
disruptions in the commercial mortgage-backed securities market and reflected losses from loan
securitization and sales activities, lower values ascribed to loans held for sale, and costs
associated with severance and certain lease terminations incurred by BLG as it downsized its
operations. Despite the credit and liquidity disruptions that began in 2007, BLG had been
successfully securitizing and selling significant volumes of small-balance commercial real estate
loans until the first quarter of 2008. In response to the illiquidity in the marketplace since that
time, BLG reduced its
- 69 -
originations activities, scaled back its workforce and made use of its contingent liquidity
sources. In addition to BLGs mortgage origination and sales activities, BLG also is entitled to
cash flows from mortgage assets that it owns or that are owned by its affiliates and from asset
management and other services provided by its affiliates. Accordingly, the Company believes that
BLG is capable of realizing positive cash flows that could be available for distribution to its
owners, including M&T, despite a lack of positive GAAP-earnings. Nevertheless, if BLG is not able
to realize sufficient cash flows for the benefit of M&T, the Company may be required to recognize
an other-than-temporary impairment charge in a future period for some portion of the $267 million
book value of its investment in BLG.
Other revenues from operations totaled $77 million in each of the second quarters of 2009 and
2008, compared with $59 million in the first quarter of 2009. Included in other revenues from
operations were the following significant components. Letter of credit and other credit-related
fees totaled $28 million and $25 million in the second quarter of 2009 and 2008, respectively, and
$21 million in the first quarter of 2009. The higher fees recognized during the recent quarter as
compared with the initial quarter of 2009 reflect increased loan syndication fees. Tax-exempt
income from bank owned life insurance, which includes increases in the cash surrender value of life
insurance policies and benefits received, totaled $13 million in the second quarter of 2009, $11
million in the year-earlier quarter and $10 million in the first quarter of 2009. Revenues from
merchant discount and credit card fees were $10 million in each of the three-month periods ended
June 30, 2009, June 30, 2008 and March 31, 2009. Insurance-related sales commissions and other
revenues totaled $12 million in the second quarter of 2009 compared with $8 million in the similar
2008 quarter and $6 million in the first quarter of 2009. The rise in such fees in 2009s second
quarter as compared with the first three months of 2009 resulted from higher reinsurance premiums
earned. As compared with the second quarter of 2008, gains realized on sales of leased equipment
declined in the recent quarter, partially offsetting the noted increases to other revenues from
operations.
Other income declined 14% to $504 million in the first six months of 2009 from $584 million in
the first half of 2008. That decline was predominantly the result of gains and losses on bank
investment securities (including other-than-temporary impairment losses), which totaled to a loss
of $56 million in the first half of 2009, compared with a net gain of $28 million in the first half
of 2008. Excluding gains and losses from bank investment securities (including
other-than-temporary impairment losses), other income aggregated $560 million and $556 million for
the six-month periods ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Increases in mortgage banking
revenues and lower losses from M&Ts investment in BLG were largely offset by declines in revenues
from providing trust, loan syndication and brokerage services, as well as lower gains realized on
sales of leased equipment in the recent quarter.
Mortgage banking revenues were $109 million for the six-month period ended June 30, 2009, 40%
above $78 million in the year-earlier period. Residential mortgage banking revenues increased to
$90 million in the first two quarters of 2009 from $60 million in the first half of 2008.
Residential mortgage loans originated for sale to other investors during the first six months of
2009 totaled $3.5 billion, compared with $2.4 billion in the similar 2008 period. Realized gains
from sales of residential mortgage loans and loan servicing rights and recognized unrealized gains
and losses on residential mortgage loans held for sale, commitments to originate loans for sale and
commitments to sell loans totaled to gains of $47 million and $17 million during the six-month
periods ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
- 70 -
Revenues from servicing residential mortgage loans for others were $41 million and $40 million
for the first half of 2009 and 2008, respectively. Included in such amounts were revenues related
to purchased servicing rights associated with the previously noted small balance commercial
mortgage loans of $15 million and $14 million for the first six months of 2009 and 2008,
respectively. Commercial mortgage banking revenues totaled $19 million during each of the first
six months of 2009 and 2008.
Service charges on deposit accounts totaled $214 million during each of the six-month periods
ended June 30, 2009 and 2008. Trust income decreased 17% to $67 million from $81 million a year
earlier, and brokerage services income declined 12% to $29 million during the first six months of
2009 from $33 million in the similar 2008 period. The declines in trust and brokerage services
income were largely attributable to lower fees for providing services that are tied to the
performance of bond and equity markets. Trading account and foreign exchange activity resulted in
gains of $9 million and $11 million for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2009 and 2008,
respectively. M&Ts investment in BLG resulted in losses of $4 million and $14 million for the six
months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Investment securities gains and losses totaled
to a loss of $56 million for the first half of 2009, compared with net gains of $28 million for the
six-month period ended June 30, 2008. Included in those amounts were other-than-temporary
impairment losses of $57 million and $6 million during the first two quarters of 2009 and 2008,
respectively. During the first six months of 2008, a $33 million gain was recognized from the
mandatory redemption of common shares of Visa. Other revenues from operations were $137 million in
the first six months of 2009 and $153 million in the similar 2008 period. Included in other
revenues from operations during the six-month periods ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 were letter of
credit and other credit-related fees of $49 million and $54 million, respectively, income from bank
owned life insurance of $23 million in each period, merchant discount and credit card fees of $20
million and $19 million, respectively, and insurance-related sales commissions and other revenues
of $18 million in each respective period. Also contributing to the decline in other revenues from
operations in the first six months of 2009 as compared with the first half of 2008 were lower gains
realized from sales of leased equipment.
Other Expense
Other expense totaled $564 million in the second quarter of 2009, up 34% from $420 million in the
year-earlier quarter and 29% above $438 million in the initial quarter of 2009. Included in the
amounts noted above are expenses considered by management to be nonoperating in nature consisting
of amortization of core deposit and other intangible assets of $15 million in the two most recent
quarters, and $17 million in the second quarter of 2008, and merger-related expenses of $66 million
and $2 million in the three-month periods ended June 30, 2009 and March 31, 2009, respectively.
There were no merger-related expenses in the second quarter of 2008. Exclusive of these
nonoperating expenses, noninterest operating expenses totaled $482 million in the recent quarter,
compared with $403 million in the year-earlier quarter and $421 million in the first quarter of
2009. The major factor in the higher level of operating expenses in the recent quarter as compared
with the second quarter of 2008 and the first quarter of 2009 was increased deposit insurance
costs, including the special assessment levied on financial institutions by the FDIC. Also
contributing to the higher level of operating expenses was the impact of the operations acquired
from Provident and increased expenses related to the foreclosure process for residential real
estate properties.
Other expense for the first two quarters of 2009 aggregated $1.0 billion, up 19% from $845
million in the corresponding period of 2008. Included in those amounts are expenses considered to
be nonoperating in nature consisting of amortization of core deposit and other intangible assets
- 71 -
of $31 million and $35 million in the first six months of 2009 and 2008, respectively, and
merger-related expenses of $69 million and $4 million in those respective periods. Exclusive of
these nonoperating expenses, noninterest operating expenses for the six-month period ended June 30,
2009 increased 12% to $903 million from $807 million in the similar 2008 period. The most
significant factor for that increase was higher deposit insurance costs in 2009. Also contributing
to the increase were costs associated with the acquired operations of Provident and higher
foreclosure-related costs. Table 2 provides a reconciliation of other expense to noninterest
operating expense.
Salaries and employee benefits expense totaled $250 million in the recent quarter, compared
with $236 million in the second quarter of 2008 and $249 million in the first quarter of 2009. As
detailed in table 2, merger-related salaries and benefits costs were $9 million in the recent
quarter. Those expenses consisted predominantly of severance expense for Provident employees. The
remaining 2% increase in salaries and benefits expense as compared with the second 2008 quarter was
attributable to the acquired operations of Provident. Exclusive of the recent quarters
merger-related expenses, salaries and benefits expense was down $8 million from the initial 2009
quarter. Lower incentive compensation and related benefits costs more than offset the additional
expenses from the Provident transaction. Salaries and employee benefits expense were $499 million
and $488 million in the first six months of 2009 and 2008, respectively. Exclusive of
merger-related expenses, salaries and employee benefits expense rose 1% to $491 million in the
first half of 2009 from $488 million in the corresponding 2008 period. That increase reflects the
impact of operations associated with the Provident transaction.
As required by GAAP, the Company has accelerated the recognition of compensation costs for
stock-based awards granted to retirement-eligible employees and employees who will become
retirement-eligible prior to full vesting of the award. As a result, stock-based compensation
expense during the first quarters of 2009 and 2008 included $9 million and $8 million,
respectively, that would have been recognized over the normal four-year vesting period if not for
the accelerated expense recognition provisions of GAAP. That acceleration had no effect on the
value of stock-based compensation awarded to employees. Salaries and benefits expense included
stock-based compensation of $11 million, $10 million and $22 million during the quarters ended June
30, 2009, June 30, 2008 and March 31, 2009, and $33 million and $29 million for the six-month
periods ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The number of full-time equivalent employees
was 14,187 at June 30, 2009, 13,052 at June 30, 2008, 12,978 at December 31, 2008 and 12,944 at
March 31, 2009. The rise in full-time equivalent employees from March 31 to June 30, 2009 resulted
from the acquisition of Provident.
Excluding the nonoperating expense items described earlier from each quarter, nonpersonnel
operating expenses were $241 million in the recent quarter, compared with $167 million in the
second quarter of 2008 and $171 million in the initial three months of 2009. On the same basis,
such expenses were $412 million and $319 million during the first six months of 2009 and 2008,
respectively. The rise in nonpersonnel operating expenses in 2009s second quarter as compared
with the year-earlier quarter and 2009s initial quarter was due largely to higher deposit
insurance costs, including the FDICs special assessment as of June 30, 2009 of $33 million. In
total, during the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2009, deposit insurance expense
aggregated $50 million and $55 million, respectively. During the three- and six-month periods
ended June 30, 2008, deposit insurance expense totaled $2 million and $3 million, respectively.
Also contributing to the higher level of expenses in the recent quarter were increased expenses
related to foreclosed residential real estate properties, including write-downs of the carrying
values of some properties resulting from lower appraised values. In comparison to the second
quarter of 2008 and first quarter of 2009, expenses associated with foreclosed real estate
increased in the recent quarter by $19 million and $21 million, respectively. Similarly, those
expenses in the
- 72 -
first half of 2009 were $20 million higher than in the corresponding 2008 period. During the
recent quarter, there was a $13 million reversal of a portion of the valuation allowance for
capitalized residential mortgage servicing rights, compared with partial reversals of such
allowance of $9 million and $5 million in the second quarter of 2008 and the first quarter of 2009,
respectively. Partial reversals of that allowance aggregated $18 million and $5 million during the
first half of 2009 and 2008, respectively. Also contributing to the rise in nonpersonnel operating
expenses in the first half of 2009 as compared with 2008 were higher costs for professional
services and the previously described $15 million reversal of the Visa contingency accrual during
the first quarter of 2008. Furthermore, the higher level of nonpersonnel operating expenses in the
second quarter and first half of 2009 reflects the impact of the operations obtained in the
Provident transaction.
The efficiency ratio, or noninterest operating expenses (as defined above) divided by the sum
of taxable-equivalent net interest income and noninterest income (exclusive of gains and losses
from bank investment securities), measures the relationship of noninterest operating expenses to
revenues. The Companys efficiency ratio was 60.0% during the recent quarter, compared with 52.4%
during the year-earlier quarter and 58.7% in the first quarter of 2009. The efficiency ratios for
the six-month periods ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 were 59.4% and 52.6%, respectively. Noninterest
operating expenses used in calculating the efficiency ratio do not include the acquisition-related
costs and amortization of core deposit and other intangible assets noted earlier, but do reflect
the previously mentioned amounts associated with the FDIC special assessment and the Visa Covered
Litigation. If charges for amortization of core deposit and other intangible assets were included,
the efficiency ratio for the three-month periods ended June 30, 2009, June 30, 2008 and March 31,
2009 would have been 61.9%, 54.6% and 60.8%, respectively, and for the six-month periods ended June
30, 2009 and 2008 would have been 61.4% and 54.9%, respectively.
Income Taxes
The provision for income taxes for the second quarter of 2009 was $11 million, compared with $78
million and $20 million in the second quarter of 2008 and first quarter of 2009, respectively. The
effective tax rates were 18.1%, 32.7% and 23.4% for the quarters ended June 30, 2009, June 30, 2008
and March 31, 2009, respectively. For the first six months of 2009 and 2008, the provision for
income taxes totaled $31 million and $181 million, respectively, and the effective tax rates were
21.1% and 33.4%, respectively. The effective tax rate is affected by the level of income earned
that is exempt from tax, the level of income allocated to the various state and local
jurisdictions where the Company operates, because tax rates differ among such jurisdictions, and
the impact of any large but infrequently occurring items. For
example, although the merger-related expenses incurred during the recent quarter are predominantly deductible
for purposes of computing income tax expense, those charges had an impact on the effective tax rate
because they lowered pre-tax income relative to the amounts of tax-exempt income and other
permanent differences that impact the effective tax rate.
The Companys effective tax rate in future periods will be affected by the results of
operations allocated to the various tax jurisdictions within which the Company operates, any change
in income tax regulations within those jurisdictions, or interpretations of income tax regulations
that differ from the Companys interpretations by any of various tax authorities that may examine
tax returns filed by M&T or any of its subsidiaries.
- 73 -
Capital
Stockholders equity was $7.4 billion at June 30, 2009, representing 10.58% of total assets,
compared with $6.5 billion or 9.89% of total assets a year earlier and $6.8 billion or 10.31% at
December 31, 2008. Included in stockholders equity at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 was
$600 million of Fixed Rate Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series A, and warrants to purchase
M&T common stock issued on December 23, 2008 as part of the U.S. Treasury Capital Purchase Program.
Provident also participated in the U.S. Treasury Capital Purchase Program in November 2008. As a
result, Providents $151.5 million of preferred stock related thereto was converted to M&T Fixed
Rate Cumulative Preferred Stock, Series C, with warrants to purchase M&T common stock. The holder
of the Series A and Series C preferred stock is entitled to cumulative cash dividends of 5% per
annum for five years after the date of initial issuance and 9% per annum thereafter, payable
quarterly in arrears. That preferred stock is redeemable at the option of M&T, subject to
regulatory approval. M&T also obtained another series of preferred stock as part of the Provident
acquisition that was converted to $26.5 million of M&T Series B Mandatory Convertible
Non-Cumulative Preferred Stock, liquidation preference of $1,000 per share. The 26,500 shares of
the Series B Preferred Stock will automatically convert into 433,148 shares of M&T common stock on
April 1, 2011. The Series B Preferred Stock pays dividends at a rate of 10% per annum on the
liquidation preference of $1,000 per share, payable quarterly in arrears. The estimated fair
values ascribed to the preferred stock and warrants to purchase common stock of M&T associated with
the acquisition of Provident were $156 million and $6 million, respectively, on the May 23, 2009
acquisition date.
Common stockholders equity was $6.7 billion, or $56.51 per share, at June 30, 2009, compared
with $6.5 billion, or $59.12 per share, at June 30, 2008 and $6.2 billion, or $56.29 per share, at
December 31, 2008. Tangible equity per common share, which excludes goodwill and core deposit and
other intangible assets and applicable deferred tax balances, was $25.17 at the end of the second
quarter of 2009, compared with $28.50 a year earlier and $25.94 at December 31, 2008. A
reconciliation of total common stockholders equity and tangible common equity as of each of those
respective dates is presented in table 2.
Stockholders equity reflects accumulated other comprehensive income or loss, which includes
the net after-tax impact of unrealized gains or losses on available-for-sale investment securities,
gains or losses associated with interest rate swap agreements designated as cash flow hedges, and
adjustments to reflect the funded status of defined benefit pension and other postretirement plans.
Net unrealized losses on available-for-sale investment securities, net of applicable tax effect,
were $407 million, or $3.45 per common share, at June 30, 2009, compared with similar losses of
$272 million, or $2.46 per common share, at June 30, 2008 and $557 million, or $5.04 per common
share, at December 31, 2008. Such unrealized losses represent the difference, net of applicable
income tax effect, between the estimated fair value and amortized cost of investment securities
classified as available for sale, including the remaining unamortized unrealized losses on
investment securities that have been transferred to held to maturity.
Reflected in net unrealized losses at June 30, 2009 were pre-tax effect unrealized losses of
$708 million on available-for-sale investment securities with an amortized cost of $2.4 billion and
pre-tax effect unrealized gains of $139 million on securities with an amortized cost of $5.1
billion. The pre-tax effect unrealized losses reflect $586 million of losses on $2.8 billion of
privately issued mortgage-backed securities considered Level 3 valuations and $87 million of losses
on $236 million of trust preferred securities issued by financial institutions generally considered
Level 2 valuations.
- 74 -
The Companys privately issued mortgage-backed securities classified as available for sale are
generally collateralized by prime and Alt-A residential mortgage loans as depicted in the
accompanying table. Information in the table is as of June 30, 2009. As with any accounting
estimate or other data, changes in fair values and investment ratings may occur at any time.
PRIVATELY ISSUED MORTGAGE-BACKED SECURITIES CLASSIFIED AS AVAILABLE FOR SALE (a)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a percentage of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net |
|
|
carrying value |
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
unrealized |
|
|
AAA |
|
|
Investment |
|
|
Senior |
|
Collateral type |
|
cost |
|
|
value |
|
|
gains(losses) |
|
|
rated |
|
|
grade |
|
|
tranche |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgage loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prime Fixed |
|
$ |
456,776 |
|
|
|
447,999 |
|
|
|
(8,777 |
) |
|
|
91 |
% |
|
|
97 |
% |
|
|
99 |
% |
Prime Hybrid ARMs |
|
|
1,942,849 |
|
|
|
1,530,213 |
|
|
|
(412,636 |
) |
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
94 |
|
Prime Other |
|
|
112,043 |
|
|
|
103,250 |
|
|
|
(8,793 |
) |
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
96 |
|
|
|
68 |
|
Alt-A Fixed |
|
|
11,912 |
|
|
|
12,173 |
|
|
|
261 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
83 |
|
Alt-A Hybrid ARMs |
|
|
277,078 |
|
|
|
144,333 |
|
|
|
(132,745 |
) |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
67 |
|
|
|
70 |
|
Alt-A Option ARMs |
|
|
5,941 |
|
|
|
511 |
|
|
|
(5,430 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
5,314 |
|
|
|
3,279 |
|
|
|
(2,035 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal |
|
|
2,811,913 |
|
|
|
2,241,758 |
|
|
|
(570,155 |
) |
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial mortgage loans |
|
|
37,124 |
|
|
|
23,018 |
|
|
|
(14,106 |
) |
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
2,849,037 |
|
|
|
2,264,776 |
|
|
|
(584,261 |
) |
|
|
41 |
% |
|
|
78 |
% |
|
|
92 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
All information is as of June 30, 2009. |
Due to the severe disruption in the credit markets during the second half of 2008 and
continuing into 2009, trading activity for privately issued mortgage-backed securities was
dramatically reduced. In estimating values for such securities, the Company was significantly
restricted in the level of market observable assumptions used in the valuation of its privately
issued mortgage-backed securities portfolio. Because of the inactivity and the lack of observable
valuation inputs, the Company transferred $2.2 billion of its privately issued mortgage-backed
securities portfolio from Level 2 to Level 3 valuations in the third quarter of 2008. The
remaining portion of its portfolio of privately issued mortgage-backed securities had already been
classified as Level 3. To assist in the determination of fair value for its privately issued
mortgage-backed securities, the Company engaged two independent pricing sources at June 30, 2009
and December 31, 2008. In determining fair value of those securities at December 31, 2008, in
general, the Company averaged the results obtained from the independent sources. In April 2009,
the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) provided guidance for estimating fair value when
the volume and level of trading activity for an asset or liability have significantly decreased.
In consideration of the new FASB guidance, the Company performed internal modeling to estimate the
cash flows and fair value of 149 of its privately issued residential mortgage-backed securities
with an amortized cost basis of $2.2 billion at June 30, 2009. The Companys internal modeling
techniques included discounting estimated bond-specific cash flows using assumptions about cash
flows associated with loans underlying each of the bonds. In estimating those cash flows, the
Company used conservative assumptions as to future delinquency, default and loss rates in order to
mitigate exposure that might be attributable to the risk that actual future credit losses could
exceed assumed credit losses. Differences between internal model valuations and external pricing
indications were generally considered to be reflective of the lack of liquidity in the market for
privately issued mortgage-backed securities. To determine the most representative fair value for
each of the 149 bonds under current market conditions, M&T computed values based on
- 75 -
judgmentally applied weightings of the internal model valuations and the indications obtained
from the average of the two independent pricing sources. Weightings applied to internal model
valuations were generally dependent on bond structure and collateral type, with prices for bonds in
non-senior tranches generally receiving lower weightings on the internal model results and greater
weightings of the valuation data provided by the independent pricing sources. As a result, certain
valuations of privately issued residential mortgage-backed securities were determined by reference
to independent pricing sources without adjustment. The average weight placed on internal model
valuations was 36%, compared with a 64% weighting on valuations provided by the independent
sources. Generally, the range of weights placed on internal valuations was between 0% and 40%.
The impact of relying on the guidance provided by the FASB and using an internal valuation modeling
technique was to increase accumulated other comprehensive income at June 30, 2009 by $140 million
($230 million pre-tax). Further information concerning the Companys valuations of privately
issued mortgage-backed securities can be found in note 10 of Notes to Financial Statements.
For the quarter ended June 30, 2009 the Company recognized $25 million (pre-tax) of
other-than-temporary impairment losses related to privately issued residential mortgage-backed
securities with an amortized cost basis (before impairment charge) of $158 million and securities
backed by trust preferred securities issued by financial institutions with an amortized cost basis
(before impairment charge) of $8 million. Those other-than-temporary impairment losses were
determined in accordance with the FASB Staff Position No. FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2 (FSP 115-2)
and, therefore, reflect the estimated credit losses on the impaired securities. The
other-than-temporary impairment losses recognized in the consolidated statement of income were net
of $46 million and $5 million of unrealized losses for the same respective securities resulting
from other factors that have been reflected in accumulated other comprehensive income. Despite
rising levels of delinquencies and losses in the underlying residential mortgage loan collateral,
given credit enhancements resulting from the structures of individual bonds, the Company has
concluded that as of June 30, 2009 its remaining privately issued mortgage-backed securities were
not other-than-temporarily impaired. Nevertheless, given recent market conditions, it is possible
that adverse changes in repayment performance and fair value could occur in the remainder of 2009
and later years that could impact the Companys conclusions. Management has modeled cash flows from
privately issued mortgage-backed securities under various scenarios and has concluded that even if
home price depreciation and current delinquency trends persist for an extended period of time, the
Companys principal losses on its privately issued mortgage-backed securities would be
substantially less than their current fair valuation losses.
As of June 30, 2009, based on a review of each of the remaining securities in the investment
securities portfolio, the Company concluded that it expects to recover its amortized cost basis for
such securities. Accordingly, the Company concluded that the declines in the values of those
securities were temporary and that additional other-than-temporary impairment charges were not
appropriate at June 30, 2009. As of that date, the Company did not intend to sell nor is it
anticipated that it would be required to sell any of its impaired securities, that is where fair
value is less than the cost basis of the security. The Company intends to closely monitor the
performance of the privately issued mortgage-backed securities and other securities to assess if
changes in their underlying credit performance or other events cause the cost basis of those
securities to become other-than-temporarily impaired. However, because the unrealized losses on
available-for-sale investment securities have generally already been reflected in the financial
statement values for investment securities and stockholders equity, any recognition of an
other-than-temporary decline in value of those investment securities would not have a material
effect on the Companys consolidated financial condition. Any other-than-temporary impairment
charge related to
- 76 -
held-to-maturity securities would result in reductions in the financial statement values for
investment securities and stockholders equity.
Adjustments to reflect the funded status of defined benefit pension and other postretirement
plans, net of applicable tax effect, reduced accumulated other comprehensive income by $174 million
at each of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, or $1.47 and $1.58 per common share at those
respective dates, and $47 million, or $.43 per common share, at June 30, 2008. The increase in
such adjustment at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 as compared with June 30, 2008 was
predominantly the result of actual investment performance of assets held by the Companys qualified
pension plan being significantly worse than that assumed for actuarial purposes. During the recent
quarter, the Company contributed 900,000 shares of M&T common stock having a then fair value of $44
million to the Companys qualified defined benefit pension plan. Those shares were issued from
previously held treasury stock.
Cash dividends paid on M&Ts common stock during the quarter ended June 30, 2009 totaled $82
million, compared with $77 million and $78 million in the quarters ended June 30, 2008 and March
31, 2009, respectively, and represented a quarterly dividend payment of $.70 per common share in
each of those quarters. Common stock dividends during the six-month periods ended June 30, 2009
and 2008 were $160 million and $154 million, respectively. A cash dividend of $7.5 million, or
$12.50 per share, was paid in the second quarter of 2009 to the U.S. Treasury on M&Ts Series A
Preferred Stock, issued on December 23, 2008, compared with a similar dividend of $4 million, or
$7.22 per share, during the first quarter of 2009.
The Company did not repurchase any shares of its common stock during 2008 or the first half of
2009.
Federal regulators generally require banking institutions to maintain Tier 1 capital and
total capital ratios of at least 4% and 8%, respectively, of risk-adjusted total assets. In
addition to the risk-based measures, Federal bank regulators have also implemented a minimum Tier
1 leverage ratio guideline of 3% of the quarterly average of total assets. As of June 30, 2009,
Tier 1 capital included trust preferred securities of $1.1 billion as described in note 4 of Notes
to Financial Statements and total capital further included subordinated capital notes of $1.6
billion.
The regulatory capital ratios of the Company, M&T Bank and M&T Bank, N.A., as of June 30, 2009
are presented in the accompanying table.
REGULATORY CAPITAL RATIOS
June 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M&T |
|
M&T |
|
M&T |
|
|
(Consolidated) |
|
Bank |
|
Bank, N.A. |
Tier 1 capital |
|
|
8.17 |
% |
|
|
7.19 |
% |
|
|
19.52 |
% |
Total capital |
|
|
11.87 |
% |
|
|
10.94 |
% |
|
|
19.84 |
% |
Tier 1 leverage |
|
|
8.38 |
% |
|
|
7.36 |
% |
|
|
19.01 |
% |
Segment Information
As required by GAAP, the Companys reportable segments have been determined based upon its internal
profitability reporting system, which is organized by strategic business unit. Financial
information about the Companys segments is presented in note 12 of Notes to Financial Statements.
The Business Banking segment recorded net income of $31 million in the second quarter of 2009,
compared with $30 million in each of the quarters
- 77 -
ended June 30, 2008 and March 31, 2009. As compared with the second quarter of 2008, higher
net interest income of $12 million, largely the result of increased deposit balances of $829
million and a 30 basis point widening of the net interest margin on loans, was mostly offset by a
$9 million increase in noninterest expenses, reflecting a $5 million increase in deposit insurance
expense. Approximately one-third of the increase in net interest income was due to the impact of
the Provident acquisition. As compared with the first quarter of 2009, a $9 million increase in
net interest income in the recent quarter, resulting from higher average deposit balances of $457
million and a 22 basis point widening of the net interest margin on loans, was largely offset by an
$8 million increase in noninterest expenses, due in part to a $4 million rise in deposit insurance
expense. Nearly one-half of the rise in net interest income resulted from the Provident
transaction. Net income for this segment aggregated $61 million in the six-month period ended June
30, 2009, compared with $62 million in the first half of 2008. The slight decline in net income
resulted from higher noninterest expenses of $11 million, reflecting a $6 million increase in
deposit insurance expense, partially offset by a $10 million rise in net interest income. The
increase in net interest income reflects the impact of higher average deposit and loan balances of
$640 million and $274 million, respectively. Approximately two-fifths of the higher net interest
income was due to the impact of the Provident acquisition.
Net income for the Commercial Banking segment totaled $70 million in 2009s second quarter,
31% higher than the $54 million earned in the second quarter of 2008, and up 22% from the $57
million recorded in the immediately preceding quarter. As compared with the second quarter of
2008, the improved performance was predominantly due to a $35 million rise in net interest income,
resulting from the impact of higher average deposit balances of $3.0 billion and a widening of the
net interest margin on loans of 43 basis points. Also contributing to the higher net income were
$3 million increases in each of credit-related fees and fees for providing corporate advisory
services, a lower provision for credit losses of $3 million, due to a decrease in net charge-offs,
and a $2 million decline in personnel costs. Partially offsetting those favorable factors was a $7
million increase in deposit insurance expense and a $5 million decline in income related to
end-of-term sales of commercial lease equipment. Contributing to the improvement in net income as
compared with 2009s first quarter were: a $14 million increase in net interest income, due mainly
to the impact of higher deposit balances of $910 million and a 15 basis point widening of the net
interest margin on loans; a lower provision for credit losses of $7 million, reflecting a decline
in net charge-offs; and a $4 million improvement in fees earned for providing loan syndication
services. Those favorable factors were partially offset by a $5 million increase in deposit
insurance expense. For the six-month period ended June 30, 2009, net income aggregated $127
million, up from $120 million earned in the corresponding period of 2008. That improvement
reflects a $44 million increase in net interest income, due, in part, to the impact of a $2.6
billion rise in average deposit balances, that was largely offset by a $14 million increase in the
provision for credit losses, due to higher net loan charge-offs; a $9 million rise in deposit
insurance expense; and lower income from providing loan syndication services and end-of-term sales
of commercial lease equipment. The Provident acquisition did not have a significant impact on the
Commercial Banking segments results for 2009.
Net income earned by the Commercial Real Estate segment totaled $23 million in the quarter
ended June 30, 2009, 45% lower than the $43 million earned in each of the quarters ended June 30,
2008 and March 31, 2009. The decline in net income from 2008s second quarter was mainly due to a
$44 million increase in the provision for credit losses, due to a significantly higher level of net
charge-offs, and a $4 million increase in noninterest expenses, due in part to higher deposit
insurance expense. The higher level
- 78 -
of charge-offs in the recent quarter includes a $33 million charge-off of a loan to a single
customer within this sector. Partially offsetting those unfavorable factors was higher net
interest income of $14 million. That improvement was the result of increases in average loan and
deposit balances of $1.0 billion and $470 million, respectively, and a 17 basis point widening of
the net interest margin on loans. Approximately one-third of the increase in net interest income
resulted from the Provident transaction. As compared with the initial 2009 quarter, the recent
quarters decline in net income was due to a higher provision for credit losses of $41 million,
reflecting the previously mentioned charge-off, and a $4 million increase in noninterest expenses,
including a $2 million increase in deposit insurance expense, offset, in part, by a $10 million
rise in net interest income. The higher net interest income resulted from increases in average
loan and deposit balances of $709 million and $309 million, respectively, and the widening of the
net interest margin on loans of 7 basis points. The increases in net interest income and average
loan balances were largely the result of the acquisition of Provident. For the six-month period
ended June 30, 2009, the Commercial Real Estate segments net income totaled $66 million, down 22%
from $85 million in the first half of 2008. That decline in net income was due to a higher
provision for credit losses of $46 million, driven by increased net charge-offs (including the $33
million partial charge-off noted above), and a $2 million increase in deposit insurance expense,
partially offset by a $17 million increase in net interest income, the result of higher average
loan and deposit balances of $837 million and $364 million, respectively, and a 7 basis point
widening of the loan net interest margin. Approximately one-third of that rise in net interest
income resulted from the acquisition of Provident.
The Discretionary Portfolio segment incurred net losses of $3 million and $5 million in the
quarters ended June 30, 2009 and March 31, 2009, respectively, compared with net income of $5
million in the second quarter of 2008. Included in the results of the two most recent quarters and
the second quarter of 2008 were other-than-temporary impairment charges (pre-tax) of $25 million,
$32 million, and $6 million, respectively. The impairment
charges recorded in the recent quarter
were on certain private CMOs and CDOs backed by trust preferred
securities of financial institutions, while the
impairment charges recorded in 2008s second quarter and the first quarter of 2009 were on certain
private CMOs. All of the impairment charges relate to bonds held in the Companys
available-for-sale investment securities portfolio. The impact of the impairment charges and a $5
million increase in the provision for credit losses, the result of an increase in net charge-offs
of residential mortgage loans, were the main factors for the recent quarters decline in net income
as compared with the second quarter of 2008. Those factors were offset, in part, by an $8 million
increase in net interest income, largely the result of the Provident acquisition. The lower net
loss as compared with the immediately preceding quarter reflects the impact of lower impairment
charges, partially offset by an increase in the provision for credit losses of $3 million,
predominantly from higher net charge-offs of residential mortgage loans. For the first six months
of 2009, this segment incurred a net loss of $8 million, compared with net income in the
corresponding period of 2008 of $21 million. That decline primarily resulted from the previously
described other-than-temporary impairment charges and a higher provision for credit losses in 2009
of $7 million. A $6 million rise in net interest income, primarily the result of the Provident
acquisition, and a $3 million decline in foreclosure-related costs, partially offset those
unfavorable factors.
The Residential Mortgage Banking segment incurred net losses of $11 million and $10 million in
the second quarters of 2009 and 2008, respectively, compared with net income of $6 million in
2009s initial quarter. As compared with the second 2008 quarter, a $31 million increase in
noninterest expenses, including a $19 million write-down of the values of
- 79 -
certain previously foreclosed-upon residential real estate development projects (the result of
updated appraised values), was mostly offset by a $16 million rise in noninterest revenues from
residential mortgage origination and sales activities, primarily resulting from increased volumes
and wider margins, and a lower provision for credit losses of $14 million, the result of a decline
in net charge-offs of loans to builders and developers of residential real estate properties. The
main factor contributing to the reduced net income as compared with the immediately preceding
quarter was the previously described $19 million valuation adjustments related to foreclosed real
estate. Also contributing to the unfavorable results were higher noninterest expenses of $9
million, reflecting increases in the provision for credit losses, personnel costs and other costs
of operations. Partially offsetting those higher expenses was a $9 million partial reversal of the
capitalized mortgage servicing rights valuation allowance in the
recent quarter, compared with a
$4 million partial reversal of such allowance in the first quarter of 2009. The Residential
Mortgage Banking segment incurred net losses of $5 million in each of the six-month periods ended
June 30, 2009 and 2008. When comparing the results of the first half of 2009 with the
corresponding 2008 period, a $30 million improvement in revenues from residential mortgage
origination and sales activities, primarily resulting from increased volume and wider margins, was
offset by a $23 million increase in noninterest expenses (including the valuation adjustment on
foreclosed real estate noted above) and a $6 million increase in the provision for credit losses,
mostly due to higher net charge-offs of loans to builders and developers of residential real
estate.
The Retail Banking segment contributed net income of $54 million in the recently completed
quarter, compared with $63 million in the second quarter of 2008 and $52 million in the first
quarter of 2009. The decline in net income from the second quarter of 2008 was mainly due to a $24
million increase in deposit insurance expense and an $11 million increase in the provision for
credit losses, predominantly due to higher net charge-offs of loans. Partially offsetting those
unfavorable factors were a $20 million increase in net interest income and a $2 million rise in
deposit service fees. The higher net interest income resulted largely from a $2.4 billion increase
in average deposit balances, of which approximately one-half was the result of the acquisition of
Provident, and a widening of the net interest margin. Contributing to the increase in net income
from the initial quarter of 2009 were higher net interest income of $15 million, reflecting
increases in average deposit and loan balances of $1.3 billion and $612 million, respectively, each
predominantly due to the impact of the acquisition of Provident; a $13 million rise in fees earned
for providing deposit account services resulting from the Provident acquisition and seasonally
lower fees in the first quarter of 2009; and a lower provision for credit losses of $3 million, due
to a decline in net charge-offs of consumer loans. Partially offsetting those favorable factors
were higher deposit insurance expense of $19 million, an increase in personnel costs of $6 million,
primarily related to the Provident acquisition, and a $3 million rise in other noninterest
expenses. For the first six months of 2009, the Retail Banking segments net income declined 23%
to $107 million from $138 million in the first six months of 2008. The leading factors
contributing to that decline were higher deposit insurance expense of $30 million and a $28 million
increase in the provision for credit losses, predominantly due to higher net charge-offs. Those
factors were offset, in part, by a $9 million rise in net interest income, due largely to a $2.0
billion increase in average deposit balances. Approximately one-third of the rise in net interest
income was due to Provident.
The All Other category reflects other activities of the Company that are not directly
attributable to the reported segments. Reflected in this category are the amortization of core
deposit and other intangible assets resulting from the acquisitions of financial institutions,
M&Ts equity in the earnings of BLG, merger-related expenses resulting from acquisitions of
- 80 -
financial institutions and the net impact of the Companys allocation methodologies for
internal funds transfer pricing and the provision for credit losses. The various components of the
All Other category resulted in net losses of $113 million in the second quarter of 2009, $23
million in the year-earlier quarter, and $119 million in the first quarter of 2009. The main
factors contributing to the higher net loss in the most recent quarter as compared with the
year-earlier quarter were the unfavorable impact from the Companys allocation methodologies for
internal transfers for funding charges and credits associated with the earning assets and
interest-bearing liabilities of the Companys reportable segments and $66 million of merger-related expenses associated with the acquisition of Provident in
the recent quarter. There were no merger-related expenses in the second quarter of 2008. Several
favorable factors contributed to the lower net loss in the second quarter of 2009 as compared with
the immediately preceding quarter including: the impact from the Companys allocation methodologies
for internal transfers of the provision for credit
losses; higher noninterest revenues associated with the business units included in the All Other
category of $22 million; and an $11 million decrease in personnel-related costs, largely due to
lower stock-based compensation expense, payroll-related taxes and other employee benefits related
to incentive compensation payments made in 2009s first quarter. Those factors were partially
offset by a $64 million increase in merger-related expenses related to the acquisition of
Provident. For the first six months of 2009,
the All Other category reported a net loss of $232 million, compared with a net loss of $60
million in the similar 2008 period. The higher net loss as compared with the first half of 2008 is
attributable to the following unfavorable factors: the impact from the Companys allocation
methodologies for internal transfers for funding charges and credits associated with the earning
assets and interest-bearing liabilities of the Companys reportable segments and the provision for
credit losses; $69 million of merger-related expenses associated with the Provident acquisition
recorded in the first half of 2009, compared with $4 million of merger-related expenses in 2008s
first six months related to acquisition transactions completed in the fourth quarter of 2007;
Visa-related transactions that were recorded in the first quarter of 2008, including the previously
mentioned $33 million gain realized from the mandatory partial redemption of Visa stock owned by
M&T Bank and $15 million related to the reversal of Visa litigation-related accruals initially made
in 2007s fourth quarter; lower trust income of $13 million; and a $17 million increase in
personnel costs associated with the business and support units included in the All Other
category.
Recent Accounting Developments
In June 2009, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 167,
Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R). SFAS No. 167 amends FASB Interpretation No. 46(R)
to eliminate the quantitative approach previously required for determining the primary beneficiary
of a variable interest entity. SFAS No. 167 instead requires a reporting entity to qualitatively
assess the determination of the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity based on whether
the reporting entity has the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the
variable interest entitys economic performance and has the obligation to absorb losses or the
right to receive benefits of the variable interest entity that could potentially be significant to
the variable interest entity. SFAS No. 167 requires ongoing reassessments of whether the reporting
entity is the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity. SFAS No. 167 is effective as of
the beginning of the first annual reporting period that begins after November 15, 2009, for interim
periods within that first annual reporting period, and for interim and annual
- 81 -
reporting periods thereafter. Earlier adoption is prohibited. The Company is still evaluating the
impact that the provisions of SFAS No. 167 will have on its financial statements.
In June 2009, the FASB also issued SFAS No. 166, Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets
an amendment of FASB Statement No. 140. SFAS No. 166 eliminates the exceptions for qualifying
special purpose entities from the consolidation guidance and the exception that permitted sale
accounting for certain mortgage securitizations when a transferor has not surrendered control over
the transferred assets. SFAS No. 166 is effective as of the beginning of the first annual
reporting period that begins after November 15, 2009, for interim periods within that first annual
reporting period, and for interim and annual reporting periods thereafter. Earlier adoption is
prohibited. The recognition and measurement provisions of this SFAS should be applied to transfers
that occur on or after the effective date. Additionally, on and after the effective date, the
concept of a qualifying special-purpose entity is no longer relevant for accounting purposes.
Therefore, formerly qualifying special-purpose entities will be evaluated for consolidation on and
after the effective date in accordance with applicable consolidation guidance, including SFAS No.
167. The Company is still evaluating the impact that the provisions of SFAS No. 166 will have on
its financial statements.
In
May 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 165, Subsequent
Events. Subsequent
events are defined by SFAS No. 165 as events or transactions that occur after the balance sheet
date but before financial statements are issued or are available to be issued. SFAS No. 165
requires an entity to recognize in the financial statements the effects of all subsequent events
that provide additional evidence about conditions that existed at the date of the balance sheet,
including the estimates inherent in the process of preparing financial statements. Subsequent
events that provide evidence about conditions that did not exist at the date of the balance sheet
but arose after the balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued or are available
to be issued are not recognized in the financial statements. SFAS No. 165 requires disclosure of
the date through which subsequent events have been evaluated, as well as nonrecognized subsequent
events of such a nature that they must be disclosed to keep the financial statements from being
misleading. SFAS No. 165 is effective for interim or annual periods ending after June 15, 2009 and
should be applied prospectively. The adoption of SFAS No. 165 did not have a material impact on
the Companys financial statements as of and for the periods ended June 30, 2009.
In December 2007, the FASB issued a revised SFAS No. 141, Business Combinations
(SFAS No. 141R). SFAS No. 141R retains the fundamental requirements of SFAS No. 141 that the
acquisition method of accounting be used for all business combinations and for an acquirer to be
identified for each business combination. SFAS No. 141R defines the acquirer as the entity that
obtains control of one or more businesses in the business combination and establishes the
acquisition date as the date the acquirer achieves control. SFAS No. 141R retains the guidance in
SFAS No. 141 for identifying and recognizing intangible assets separately from goodwill. With
limited exceptions, the statement requires an acquirer to recognize the assets acquired, the
liabilities assumed and any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree at the acquisition date,
measured at their fair value as of that date. That replaces SFAS No. 141s cost-allocation process,
which required the cost of an acquisition to be allocated to the individual assets acquired and
liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair values. As a result, certain acquisition-related
costs previously included in the cost of an acquisition are now required to be expensed as
incurred. In addition, certain restructuring costs previously recognized as if they were an assumed
liability from an acquisition are also required to be expensed. SFAS No. 141R also requires the
acquirer in a business combination achieved in stages
- 82 -
(sometimes referred to as a step acquisition) to recognize the identifiable assets and
liabilities, as well as the noncontrolling interest in the acquiree, at the full amounts of their
fair values. SFAS No. 141R requires an acquirer to recognize goodwill as of the acquisition date
measured as a residual, which in most types of business combinations will result in measuring
goodwill as the excess of the consideration transferred plus the fair value of any noncontrolling
interest in the acquiree at the acquisition date over the fair value of the identifiable net assets
acquired. SFAS No. 141R also eliminates the recognition of a separate valuation allowance, such as
an allowance for credit losses, as of the acquisition date for assets acquired in a business
combination that are measured at their acquisition-date fair values because the effects of
uncertainty about future cash flows should be included in the fair value measurement of those
assets. SFAS No. 141R must be applied prospectively to business combinations for which the
acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or
after December 15, 2008. Earlier adoption is prohibited. The adoption of SFAS No. 141R
significantly impacts the accounting for acquisitions consummated in 2009 and beyond, including the
Companys acquisition of Provident in a stock-for-stock transaction, which was completed on May 23,
2009. Information concerning the Provident acquisition is included in note 2 of Notes to Financial
Statements.
In April 2009, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position FAS 141(R)-1, Accounting for Assets
Acquired and Liabilities Assumed in a Business Combination That Arise from Contingencies (FSP
141R-1). FSP 141R-1 amends and clarifies SFAS No. 141R to address application issues with respect
to initial recognition and measurement, subsequent measurement and accounting, and disclosure of
assets and liabilities arising from contingencies in a business combination. FSP 141R-1 applies to
all assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a business combination that arise from contingencies
that would be within the scope of SFAS No. 5, Accounting for Contingencies, if not acquired or
assumed in a business combination, except for assets or liabilities arising from contingencies that
are subject to specific guidance in SFAS No. 141R. FSP 141R-1 requires an acquirer to recognize at
fair value, at the acquisition date, an asset acquired or a liability assumed in a business
combination that arises from a contingency if the acquisition-date fair value of that asset or
liability can be determined during the measurement period. If the acquisition-date fair value of
an asset acquired or a liability assumed in a business combination that arises from a contingency
cannot be determined during the measurement period, an asset or liability shall be recognized if it
is probable that an asset existed or that a liability had been incurred at the acquisition date and
the amount of the asset or liability can be reasonably estimated. An acquirer shall develop a
rational basis for subsequently measuring and accounting for assets and liabilities arising from
contingencies depending on their nature. FSP 141R-1 is effective for assets or liabilities arising
from contingencies in business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the
beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2008. The
Company applied the guidance of FSP 141R-1 in accounting for the aforementioned Provident
transaction completed during the second quarter of 2009. Information concerning the Provident
acquisition is included in note 2 of Notes to Financial Statements.
In December 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position FAS 132(R)-1, Employers Disclosures
about Postretirement Benefit Plan Assets (FSP 132R-1). FSP 132R-1 was issued to provide guidance
on an employers disclosures about plan assets of a defined benefit pension or other postretirement
plan. FSP 132R-1 requires an employer to disclose information about how investment allocation
decisions are made, including factors that are pertinent to an understanding of investment policies
and strategies. An employer will also need to disclose separately for pension plans and other
postretirement benefit plans the fair value of each major category of plan assets as of each
- 83 -
annual reporting date for which a statement of financial position is presented. FSP 132R-1
also requires the disclosure of information that enables financial statement users to assess the
inputs and valuation techniques used to develop fair value measurements of plan assets at the
annual reporting date. For fair value measurements using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3),
an employer will be required to disclose the effect of the measurements on changes in plan assets
for the period. Furthermore, an employer is required to provide financial statement users with an
understanding of significant concentrations of risk in plan assets. FSP 132R-1 should be applied
for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2009. Upon initial application, the provisions of
FSP 132R-1 are not required for earlier periods that are presented for comparative purposes. The
Company intends to comply with the disclosure requirements of FSP 132R-1.
Forward-Looking Statements
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and other
sections of this quarterly report contain forward-looking statements that are based on current
expectations, estimates and projections about the Companys business, managements beliefs and
assumptions made by management. These statements are not guarantees of future performance and
involve certain risks, uncertainties and assumptions (Future Factors) which are difficult to
predict. Therefore, actual outcomes and results may differ materially from what is expressed or
forecasted in such forward-looking statements.
Future Factors include changes in interest rates, spreads on earning assets and
interest-bearing liabilities, and interest rate sensitivity; prepayment speeds, loan originations,
credit losses and market values on loans, collateral securing loans and other assets; sources of
liquidity; common shares outstanding; common stock price volatility; fair value of and number of
stock-based compensation awards to be issued in future periods; legislation affecting the financial
services industry as a whole, and M&T and its subsidiaries individually or collectively, including
tax legislation; regulatory supervision and oversight, including monetary policy and required
capital levels; changes in accounting policies or procedures as may be required by the FASB or
other regulatory agencies; increasing price and product/service competition by competitors,
including new entrants; rapid technological developments and changes; the ability to continue to
introduce competitive new products and services on a timely, cost-effective basis; the mix of
products/services; containing costs and expenses; governmental and public policy changes;
protection and validity of intellectual property rights; reliance on large customers;
technological, implementation and cost/financial risks in large, multi-year contracts; the outcome
of pending and future litigation and governmental proceedings, including tax-related examinations
and other matters; continued availability of financing; financial resources in the amounts, at the
times and on the terms required to support M&T and its subsidiaries future businesses; and
material differences in the actual financial results of merger, acquisition and investment
activities compared with M&Ts initial expectations, including the full realization of anticipated
cost savings and revenue enhancements.
These are representative of the Future Factors that could affect the outcome of the
forward-looking statements. In addition, such statements could be affected by general industry and
market conditions and growth rates, general economic and political conditions, either nationally or
in the states in which M&T and its subsidiaries do business, including interest rate and currency
exchange rate fluctuations, changes and trends in the securities markets, and other Future Factors.
- 84 -
M&T BANK CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Table 1
QUARTERLY TRENDS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 Quarters |
|
2008 Quarters |
|
|
Second |
|
First |
|
Fourth |
|
Third |
|
Second |
|
First |
|
Earnings and dividends |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts in thousands, except per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income (taxable-equivalent basis) |
|
$ |
682,637 |
|
|
|
659,445 |
|
|
|
779,468 |
|
|
|
806,614 |
|
|
|
823,425 |
|
|
|
889,945 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
175,856 |
|
|
|
206,705 |
|
|
|
288,426 |
|
|
|
313,115 |
|
|
|
330,942 |
|
|
|
405,312 |
|
|
Net interest income |
|
|
506,781 |
|
|
|
452,740 |
|
|
|
491,042 |
|
|
|
493,499 |
|
|
|
492,483 |
|
|
|
484,633 |
|
Less: provision for credit losses |
|
|
147,000 |
|
|
|
158,000 |
|
|
|
151,000 |
|
|
|
101,000 |
|
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
60,000 |
|
Other income |
|
|
271,649 |
|
|
|
232,341 |
|
|
|
241,417 |
|
|
|
113,717 |
|
|
|
271,182 |
|
|
|
312,663 |
|
Less: other expense |
|
|
563,710 |
|
|
|
438,346 |
|
|
|
446,819 |
|
|
|
434,763 |
|
|
|
419,710 |
|
|
|
425,704 |
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
67,720 |
|
|
|
88,735 |
|
|
|
134,640 |
|
|
|
71,453 |
|
|
|
243,955 |
|
|
|
311,592 |
|
Applicable income taxes (benefit) |
|
|
11,318 |
|
|
|
19,581 |
|
|
|
27,432 |
|
|
|
(24,992 |
) |
|
|
77,839 |
|
|
|
103,613 |
|
Taxable-equivalent adjustment |
|
|
5,214 |
|
|
|
4,933 |
|
|
|
4,967 |
|
|
|
5,260 |
|
|
|
5,851 |
|
|
|
5,783 |
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
51,188 |
|
|
|
64,221 |
|
|
|
102,241 |
|
|
|
91,185 |
|
|
|
160,265 |
|
|
|
202,196 |
|
|
Net income available to common shareholders |
|
$ |
40,516 |
|
|
|
54,618 |
|
|
|
101,451 |
|
|
|
91,185 |
|
|
|
160,265 |
|
|
|
202,196 |
|
Per common share data |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings |
|
$ |
.36 |
|
|
|
.49 |
|
|
|
.92 |
|
|
|
.83 |
|
|
|
1.45 |
|
|
|
1.84 |
|
Diluted earnings |
|
|
.36 |
|
|
|
.49 |
|
|
|
.92 |
|
|
|
.82 |
|
|
|
1.44 |
|
|
|
1.82 |
|
Cash dividends |
|
$ |
.70 |
|
|
|
.70 |
|
|
|
.70 |
|
|
|
.70 |
|
|
|
.70 |
|
|
|
.70 |
|
Average common shares outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
113,218 |
|
|
|
110,439 |
|
|
|
110,370 |
|
|
|
110,265 |
|
|
|
110,191 |
|
|
|
110,017 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
113,521 |
|
|
|
110,439 |
|
|
|
110,620 |
|
|
|
110,807 |
|
|
|
111,227 |
|
|
|
110,967 |
|
|
Performance ratios, annualized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average assets |
|
|
.31 |
% |
|
|
.40 |
% |
|
|
.63 |
% |
|
|
.56 |
% |
|
|
.98 |
% |
|
|
1.25 |
% |
Average common stockholders equity |
|
|
2.53 |
% |
|
|
3.61 |
% |
|
|
6.41 |
% |
|
|
5.66 |
% |
|
|
9.96 |
% |
|
|
12.49 |
% |
Net interest margin on average earning assets
(taxable-equivalent basis) |
|
|
3.43 |
% |
|
|
3.19 |
% |
|
|
3.37 |
% |
|
|
3.39 |
% |
|
|
3.39 |
% |
|
|
3.38 |
% |
Nonaccrual loans to total loans and leases,
net of unearned discount |
|
|
2.11 |
% |
|
|
2.05 |
% |
|
|
1.54 |
% |
|
|
1.41 |
% |
|
|
1.16 |
% |
|
|
.97 |
% |
Efficiency ratio (a) |
|
|
61.93 |
% |
|
|
60.82 |
% |
|
|
59.11 |
% |
|
|
57.24 |
% |
|
|
54.57 |
% |
|
|
55.27 |
% |
|
Net operating (tangible) results (b) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating income (in thousands) |
|
$ |
100,805 |
|
|
|
75,034 |
|
|
|
111,784 |
|
|
|
100,809 |
|
|
|
170,361 |
|
|
|
215,597 |
|
Diluted net operating income per common share |
|
|
.79 |
|
|
|
.59 |
|
|
|
1.00 |
|
|
|
.91 |
|
|
|
1.53 |
|
|
|
1.94 |
|
Annualized return on |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average tangible assets |
|
|
.64 |
% |
|
|
.50 |
% |
|
|
.72 |
% |
|
|
.65 |
% |
|
|
1.10 |
% |
|
|
1.41 |
% |
Average tangible common stockholders equity |
|
|
12.08 |
% |
|
|
9.36 |
% |
|
|
15.01 |
% |
|
|
13.17 |
% |
|
|
22.20 |
% |
|
|
27.86 |
% |
Efficiency ratio (a) |
|
|
60.03 |
% |
|
|
58.68 |
% |
|
|
57.03 |
% |
|
|
55.16 |
% |
|
|
52.41 |
% |
|
|
52.85 |
% |
|
Balance sheet data |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In millions, except per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average balances |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets (c) |
|
$ |
66,984 |
|
|
|
64,766 |
|
|
|
64,942 |
|
|
|
64,997 |
|
|
|
65,584 |
|
|
|
65,015 |
|
Total tangible assets (c) |
|
|
63,500 |
|
|
|
61,420 |
|
|
|
61,584 |
|
|
|
61,627 |
|
|
|
62,201 |
|
|
|
61,614 |
|
Earning assets |
|
|
59,297 |
|
|
|
57,509 |
|
|
|
57,919 |
|
|
|
57,971 |
|
|
|
58,465 |
|
|
|
57,713 |
|
Investment securities |
|
|
8,508 |
|
|
|
8,490 |
|
|
|
8,894 |
|
|
|
9,303 |
|
|
|
8,770 |
|
|
|
8,924 |
|
Loans and leases, net of unearned discount |
|
|
50,554 |
|
|
|
48,824 |
|
|
|
48,810 |
|
|
|
48,477 |
|
|
|
49,522 |
|
|
|
48,575 |
|
Deposits |
|
|
43,846 |
|
|
|
41,487 |
|
|
|
40,447 |
|
|
|
39,503 |
|
|
|
39,711 |
|
|
|
39,999 |
|
Common stockholders equity (c) |
|
|
6,491 |
|
|
|
6,212 |
|
|
|
6,299 |
|
|
|
6,415 |
|
|
|
6,469 |
|
|
|
6,513 |
|
Tangible common stockholders equity (c) |
|
|
3,007 |
|
|
|
2,866 |
|
|
|
2,941 |
|
|
|
3,045 |
|
|
|
3,086 |
|
|
|
3,112 |
|
|
At end of quarter |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets (c) |
|
$ |
69,913 |
|
|
|
64,883 |
|
|
|
65,816 |
|
|
|
65,247 |
|
|
|
65,893 |
|
|
|
66,086 |
|
Total tangible assets (c) |
|
|
66,215 |
|
|
|
61,544 |
|
|
|
62,464 |
|
|
|
61,883 |
|
|
|
62,517 |
|
|
|
62,696 |
|
Earning assets |
|
|
61,044 |
|
|
|
56,823 |
|
|
|
57,107 |
|
|
|
57,430 |
|
|
|
57,949 |
|
|
|
58,030 |
|
Investment securities |
|
|
8,155 |
|
|
|
7,687 |
|
|
|
7,919 |
|
|
|
8,433 |
|
|
|
8,659 |
|
|
|
8,676 |
|
Loans and leases, net of unearned discount |
|
|
52,715 |
|
|
|
48,918 |
|
|
|
49,000 |
|
|
|
48,694 |
|
|
|
49,115 |
|
|
|
49,279 |
|
Deposits |
|
|
46,755 |
|
|
|
42,477 |
|
|
|
42,581 |
|
|
|
42,501 |
|
|
|
41,926 |
|
|
|
41,533 |
|
Common stockholders equity (c) |
|
|
6,669 |
|
|
|
6,329 |
|
|
|
6,217 |
|
|
|
6,417 |
|
|
|
6,519 |
|
|
|
6,488 |
|
Tangible common stockholders equity (c) |
|
|
2,971 |
|
|
|
2,990 |
|
|
|
2,865 |
|
|
|
3,053 |
|
|
|
3,143 |
|
|
|
3,098 |
|
Equity per common share |
|
|
56.51 |
|
|
|
56.95 |
|
|
|
56.29 |
|
|
|
58.17 |
|
|
|
59.12 |
|
|
|
58.92 |
|
Tangible equity per common share |
|
|
25.17 |
|
|
|
26.90 |
|
|
|
25.94 |
|
|
|
27.67 |
|
|
|
28.50 |
|
|
|
28.14 |
|
|
Market price per common share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High |
|
$ |
61.87 |
|
|
|
59.08 |
|
|
|
99.50 |
|
|
|
108.53 |
|
|
|
98.38 |
|
|
|
94.03 |
|
Low |
|
|
43.50 |
|
|
|
29.11 |
|
|
|
52.20 |
|
|
|
53.61 |
|
|
|
69.90 |
|
|
|
70.49 |
|
Closing |
|
|
50.93 |
|
|
|
45.24 |
|
|
|
57.41 |
|
|
|
89.25 |
|
|
|
70.54 |
|
|
|
80.48 |
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Excludes impact of merger-related expenses and net securities transactions. |
|
(b) |
|
Excludes amortization and balances related to goodwill and core deposit and other intangible
assets and merger-related expenses which,
except in the calculation of the efficiency ratio, are net of applicable income tax effects. A
reconciliation of net income and net operating
income appears in table 2. |
|
(c) |
|
The difference between total assets and total tangible assets, and common stockholders
equity and tangible common stockholders equity,
represents goodwill, core deposit and other intangible assets, net of applicable deferred tax
balances. A reconciliation of such balances
appears in table 2. |
- 85 -
M&T BANK CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Table 2
RECONCILIATION OF QUARTERLY GAAP TO NON-GAAP MEASURES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 Quarters |
|
2008 Quarters |
|
|
Second |
|
First |
|
Fourth |
|
Third |
|
Second |
|
First |
|
Income statement data |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In thousands, except per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
51,188 |
|
|
|
64,221 |
|
|
|
102,241 |
|
|
|
91,185 |
|
|
|
160,265 |
|
|
|
202,196 |
|
Amortization of core deposit and other
intangible assets (a) |
|
|
9,247 |
|
|
|
9,337 |
|
|
|
9,543 |
|
|
|
9,624 |
|
|
|
10,096 |
|
|
|
11,241 |
|
Merger-related expenses (a) |
|
|
40,370 |
|
|
|
1,476 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,160 |
|
|
Net operating income |
|
$ |
100,805 |
|
|
|
75,034 |
|
|
|
111,784 |
|
|
|
100,809 |
|
|
|
170,361 |
|
|
|
215,597 |
|
|
Earnings per common share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per common share |
|
$ |
.36 |
|
|
|
.49 |
|
|
|
.92 |
|
|
|
.82 |
|
|
|
1.44 |
|
|
|
1.82 |
|
Amortization of core deposit and other
intangible assets (a) |
|
|
.08 |
|
|
|
.09 |
|
|
|
.08 |
|
|
|
.09 |
|
|
|
.09 |
|
|
|
.10 |
|
Merger-related expenses (a) |
|
|
.35 |
|
|
|
.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.02 |
|
|
Diluted net operating earnings per common share |
|
$ |
.79 |
|
|
|
.59 |
|
|
|
1.00 |
|
|
|
.91 |
|
|
|
1.53 |
|
|
|
1.94 |
|
|
Other expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other expense |
|
$ |
563,710 |
|
|
|
438,346 |
|
|
|
446,819 |
|
|
|
434,763 |
|
|
|
419,710 |
|
|
|
425,704 |
|
Amortization of core deposit and other
intangible assets |
|
|
(15,231 |
) |
|
|
(15,370 |
) |
|
|
(15,708 |
) |
|
|
(15,840 |
) |
|
|
(16,615 |
) |
|
|
(18,483 |
) |
Merger-related expenses |
|
|
(66,457 |
) |
|
|
(2,426 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,547 |
) |
|
Noninterest operating expense |
|
$ |
482,022 |
|
|
|
420,550 |
|
|
|
431,111 |
|
|
|
418,923 |
|
|
|
403,095 |
|
|
|
403,674 |
|
|
Merger-related expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries and employee benefits |
|
$ |
8,768 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
62 |
|
Equipment and net occupancy |
|
|
581 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49 |
|
Printing, postage and supplies |
|
|
2,514 |
|
|
|
301 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
367 |
|
Other costs of operations |
|
|
54,594 |
|
|
|
2,110 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,069 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
66,457 |
|
|
|
2,426 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,547 |
|
|
Balance sheet data |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In millions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average assets |
|
$ |
66,984 |
|
|
|
64,766 |
|
|
|
64,942 |
|
|
|
64,997 |
|
|
|
65,584 |
|
|
|
65,015 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
(3,326 |
) |
|
|
(3,192 |
) |
|
|
(3,192 |
) |
|
|
(3,192 |
) |
|
|
(3,192 |
) |
|
|
(3,196 |
) |
Core deposit and other intangible assets |
|
|
(188 |
) |
|
|
(176 |
) |
|
|
(191 |
) |
|
|
(206 |
) |
|
|
(222 |
) |
|
|
(239 |
) |
Deferred taxes |
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
Average tangible assets |
|
$ |
63,500 |
|
|
|
61,420 |
|
|
|
61,584 |
|
|
|
61,627 |
|
|
|
62,201 |
|
|
|
61,614 |
|
|
Average common equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average common equity |
|
$ |
6,491 |
|
|
|
6,212 |
|
|
|
6,299 |
|
|
|
6,415 |
|
|
|
6,469 |
|
|
|
6,513 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
(3,326 |
) |
|
|
(3,192 |
) |
|
|
(3,192 |
) |
|
|
(3,192 |
) |
|
|
(3,192 |
) |
|
|
(3,196 |
) |
Core deposit and other intangible assets |
|
|
(188 |
) |
|
|
(176 |
) |
|
|
(191 |
) |
|
|
(206 |
) |
|
|
(222 |
) |
|
|
(239 |
) |
Deferred taxes |
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
Average tangible common equity |
|
$ |
3,007 |
|
|
|
2,866 |
|
|
|
2,941 |
|
|
|
3,045 |
|
|
|
3,086 |
|
|
|
3,112 |
|
|
At end of quarter |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
69,913 |
|
|
|
64,883 |
|
|
|
65,816 |
|
|
|
65,247 |
|
|
|
65,893 |
|
|
|
66,086 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
(3,525 |
) |
|
|
(3,192 |
) |
|
|
(3,192 |
) |
|
|
(3,192 |
) |
|
|
(3,192 |
) |
|
|
(3,192 |
) |
Core deposit and other intangible assets |
|
|
(216 |
) |
|
|
(168 |
) |
|
|
(183 |
) |
|
|
(199 |
) |
|
|
(214 |
) |
|
|
(230 |
) |
Deferred taxes |
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
Total tangible assets |
|
$ |
66,215 |
|
|
|
61,544 |
|
|
|
62,464 |
|
|
|
61,883 |
|
|
|
62,517 |
|
|
|
62,696 |
|
|
Total common equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total common equity |
|
$ |
6,669 |
|
|
|
6,329 |
|
|
|
6,217 |
|
|
|
6,417 |
|
|
|
6,519 |
|
|
|
6,488 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
(3,525 |
) |
|
|
(3,192 |
) |
|
|
(3,192 |
) |
|
|
(3,192 |
) |
|
|
(3,192 |
) |
|
|
(3,192 |
) |
Core deposit and other intangible assets |
|
|
(216 |
) |
|
|
(168 |
) |
|
|
(183 |
) |
|
|
(199 |
) |
|
|
(214 |
) |
|
|
(230 |
) |
Deferred taxes |
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
Total tangible common equity |
|
$ |
2,971 |
|
|
|
2,990 |
|
|
|
2,865 |
|
|
|
3,053 |
|
|
|
3,143 |
|
|
|
3,098 |
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
After any related tax effect. |
- 86 -
M&T BANK CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Table 3
AVERAGE BALANCE SHEETS AND ANNUALIZED TAXABLE-EQUIVALENT RATES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 Second Quarter |
|
2009 First Quarter |
|
2008 Fourth Quarter |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
Average balance in millions; interest in thousands |
|
Balance |
|
Interest |
|
Rate |
|
Balance |
|
Interest |
|
Rate |
|
Balance |
|
Interest |
|
Rate |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earning assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans and leases, net of unearned discount* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial, financial, etc. |
|
$ |
14,067 |
|
|
$ |
131,886 |
|
|
|
3.76 |
% |
|
|
14,031 |
|
|
|
129,222 |
|
|
|
3.74 |
% |
|
|
14,213 |
|
|
|
169,492 |
|
|
|
4.74 |
% |
Real estate commercial |
|
|
19,719 |
|
|
|
219,813 |
|
|
|
4.46 |
|
|
|
18,795 |
|
|
|
206,967 |
|
|
|
4.40 |
|
|
|
18,666 |
|
|
|
259,145 |
|
|
|
5.55 |
|
Real estate consumer |
|
|
5,262 |
|
|
|
71,079 |
|
|
|
5.40 |
|
|
|
5,033 |
|
|
|
70,353 |
|
|
|
5.59 |
|
|
|
4,904 |
|
|
|
71,778 |
|
|
|
5.85 |
|
Consumer |
|
|
11,506 |
|
|
|
155,609 |
|
|
|
5.42 |
|
|
|
10,965 |
|
|
|
151,968 |
|
|
|
5.62 |
|
|
|
11,027 |
|
|
|
168,584 |
|
|
|
6.08 |
|
|
Total loans and leases, net |
|
|
50,554 |
|
|
|
578,387 |
|
|
|
4.59 |
|
|
|
48,824 |
|
|
|
558,510 |
|
|
|
4.64 |
|
|
|
48,810 |
|
|
|
668,999 |
|
|
|
5.45 |
|
|
Interest-bearing deposits at banks |
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
.05 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
.16 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
.55 |
|
Federal funds sold and agreements
to resell securities |
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
.23 |
|
|
|
102 |
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
.23 |
|
|
|
103 |
|
|
|
108 |
|
|
|
.41 |
|
Trading account |
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
231 |
|
|
|
.77 |
|
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
123 |
|
|
|
.67 |
|
|
|
99 |
|
|
|
785 |
|
|
|
3.16 |
|
Investment securities** |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury and federal agencies |
|
|
3,806 |
|
|
|
46,353 |
|
|
|
4.88 |
|
|
|
3,727 |
|
|
|
45,610 |
|
|
|
4.96 |
|
|
|
3,901 |
|
|
|
48,260 |
|
|
|
4.92 |
|
Obligations of states and political subdivisions |
|
|
198 |
|
|
|
2,924 |
|
|
|
5.94 |
|
|
|
136 |
|
|
|
2,170 |
|
|
|
6.47 |
|
|
|
127 |
|
|
|
2,161 |
|
|
|
6.76 |
|
Other |
|
|
4,504 |
|
|
|
54,694 |
|
|
|
4.87 |
|
|
|
4,627 |
|
|
|
52,966 |
|
|
|
4.64 |
|
|
|
4,866 |
|
|
|
59,137 |
|
|
|
4.84 |
|
|
Total investment securities |
|
|
8,508 |
|
|
|
103,971 |
|
|
|
4.90 |
|
|
|
8,490 |
|
|
|
100,746 |
|
|
|
4.81 |
|
|
|
8,894 |
|
|
|
109,558 |
|
|
|
4.90 |
|
|
Total earning assets |
|
|
59,297 |
|
|
|
682,637 |
|
|
|
4.62 |
|
|
|
57,509 |
|
|
|
659,445 |
|
|
|
4.65 |
|
|
|
57,919 |
|
|
|
779,468 |
|
|
|
5.35 |
|
|
Allowance for credit losses |
|
|
(867 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(815 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(806 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks |
|
|
1,077 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,086 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,156 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets |
|
|
7,477 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,986 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,673 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
66,984 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
64,766 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
64,942 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing deposits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOW accounts |
|
$ |
515 |
|
|
|
246 |
|
|
|
.19 |
|
|
|
536 |
|
|
|
327 |
|
|
|
.25 |
|
|
|
528 |
|
|
|
592 |
|
|
|
.45 |
|
Savings deposits |
|
|
22,480 |
|
|
|
26,362 |
|
|
|
.47 |
|
|
|
21,203 |
|
|
|
41,922 |
|
|
|
.80 |
|
|
|
19,540 |
|
|
|
62,227 |
|
|
|
1.27 |
|
Time deposits |
|
|
8,858 |
|
|
|
55,697 |
|
|
|
2.52 |
|
|
|
8,720 |
|
|
|
60,329 |
|
|
|
2.81 |
|
|
|
9,388 |
|
|
|
72,179 |
|
|
|
3.06 |
|
Deposits at foreign office |
|
|
1,460 |
|
|
|
576 |
|
|
|
.16 |
|
|
|
2,473 |
|
|
|
981 |
|
|
|
.16 |
|
|
|
2,985 |
|
|
|
5,326 |
|
|
|
.71 |
|
|
Total interest-bearing deposits |
|
|
33,313 |
|
|
|
82,881 |
|
|
|
1.00 |
|
|
|
32,932 |
|
|
|
103,559 |
|
|
|
1.28 |
|
|
|
32,441 |
|
|
|
140,324 |
|
|
|
1.72 |
|
|
Short-term borrowings |
|
|
3,211 |
|
|
|
2,015 |
|
|
|
.25 |
|
|
|
3,477 |
|
|
|
2,348 |
|
|
|
.27 |
|
|
|
4,950 |
|
|
|
10,239 |
|
|
|
.82 |
|
Long-term borrowings |
|
|
11,482 |
|
|
|
90,960 |
|
|
|
3.18 |
|
|
|
11,643 |
|
|
|
100,798 |
|
|
|
3.51 |
|
|
|
12,058 |
|
|
|
137,863 |
|
|
|
4.55 |
|
|
Total interest-bearing liabilities |
|
|
48,006 |
|
|
|
175,856 |
|
|
|
1.47 |
|
|
|
48,052 |
|
|
|
206,705 |
|
|
|
1.74 |
|
|
|
49,449 |
|
|
|
288,426 |
|
|
|
2.32 |
|
|
Noninterest-bearing deposits |
|
|
10,533 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,555 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
1,318 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,379 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,133 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
59,857 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
57,986 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58,588 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity |
|
|
7,127 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,780 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,354 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
66,984 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
64,766 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
64,942 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest spread |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.91 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.03 |
|
Contribution of interest-free funds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.34 |
|
|
Net interest income/margin on earning assets |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
506,781 |
|
|
|
3.43 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
452,740 |
|
|
|
3.19 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
491,042 |
|
|
|
3.37 |
% |
|
(continued)
|
|
|
* |
|
Includes nonaccrual loans. |
|
** |
|
Includes available for sale securities at amortized cost. |
- 87 -
M&T BANK CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Table 3 (continued)
AVERAGE BALANCE SHEETS AND ANNUALIZED TAXABLE-EQUIVALENT RATES (continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 Third Quarter |
|
2008 Second Quarter |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
Average balance in millions; interest in thousands |
|
Balance |
|
Interest |
|
Rate |
|
Balance |
|
Interest |
|
Rate |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earning assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans and leases, net of unearned discount* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial, financial, etc. |
|
$ |
13,882 |
|
|
$ |
177,497 |
|
|
|
5.09 |
% |
|
|
13,800 |
|
|
|
176,353 |
|
|
|
5.14 |
% |
Real estate commercial |
|
|
18,557 |
|
|
|
260,879 |
|
|
|
5.62 |
|
|
|
18,491 |
|
|
|
266,323 |
|
|
|
5.76 |
|
Real estate consumer |
|
|
4,964 |
|
|
|
74,582 |
|
|
|
6.01 |
|
|
|
6,026 |
|
|
|
91,035 |
|
|
|
6.04 |
|
Consumer |
|
|
11,074 |
|
|
|
175,558 |
|
|
|
6.31 |
|
|
|
11,205 |
|
|
|
178,598 |
|
|
|
6.41 |
|
|
Total loans and leases, net |
|
|
48,477 |
|
|
|
688,516 |
|
|
|
5.65 |
|
|
|
49,522 |
|
|
|
712,309 |
|
|
|
5.79 |
|
|
Interest-bearing deposits at banks |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
1.09 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
1.14 |
|
Federal funds sold and agreements
to resell securities |
|
|
102 |
|
|
|
515 |
|
|
|
2.01 |
|
|
|
101 |
|
|
|
492 |
|
|
|
1.96 |
|
Trading account |
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
359 |
|
|
|
1.81 |
|
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
143 |
|
|
|
.90 |
|
Investment securities** |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury and federal agencies |
|
|
4,067 |
|
|
|
50,085 |
|
|
|
4.90 |
|
|
|
3,462 |
|
|
|
40,996 |
|
|
|
4.76 |
|
Obligations of states and political subdivisions |
|
|
129 |
|
|
|
2,191 |
|
|
|
6.79 |
|
|
|
140 |
|
|
|
2,455 |
|
|
|
7.03 |
|
Other |
|
|
5,107 |
|
|
|
64,923 |
|
|
|
5.06 |
|
|
|
5,168 |
|
|
|
67,008 |
|
|
|
5.22 |
|
|
Total investment securities |
|
|
9,303 |
|
|
|
117,199 |
|
|
|
5.01 |
|
|
|
8,770 |
|
|
|
110,459 |
|
|
|
5.07 |
|
|
Total earning assets |
|
|
57,971 |
|
|
|
806,614 |
|
|
|
5.54 |
|
|
|
58,465 |
|
|
|
823,425 |
|
|
|
5.66 |
|
|
Allowance for credit losses |
|
|
(790 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(792 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks |
|
|
1,236 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,209 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets |
|
|
6,580 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,702 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
64,997 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65,584 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing deposits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOW accounts |
|
$ |
484 |
|
|
|
655 |
|
|
|
.54 |
|
|
|
512 |
|
|
|
629 |
|
|
|
.49 |
|
Savings deposits |
|
|
18,191 |
|
|
|
58,917 |
|
|
|
1.29 |
|
|
|
18,092 |
|
|
|
60,317 |
|
|
|
1.34 |
|
Time deposits |
|
|
9,318 |
|
|
|
72,100 |
|
|
|
3.08 |
|
|
|
9,216 |
|
|
|
79,467 |
|
|
|
3.47 |
|
Deposits at foreign office |
|
|
3,837 |
|
|
|
18,709 |
|
|
|
1.94 |
|
|
|
4,314 |
|
|
|
22,075 |
|
|
|
2.06 |
|
|
Total interest-bearing deposits |
|
|
31,830 |
|
|
|
150,381 |
|
|
|
1.88 |
|
|
|
32,134 |
|
|
|
162,488 |
|
|
|
2.03 |
|
|
Short-term borrowings |
|
|
5,392 |
|
|
|
28,155 |
|
|
|
2.08 |
|
|
|
6,869 |
|
|
|
42,612 |
|
|
|
2.49 |
|
Long-term borrowings |
|
|
12,666 |
|
|
|
134,579 |
|
|
|
4.23 |
|
|
|
11,407 |
|
|
|
125,842 |
|
|
|
4.44 |
|
|
Total interest-bearing liabilities |
|
|
49,888 |
|
|
|
313,115 |
|
|
|
2.50 |
|
|
|
50,410 |
|
|
|
330,942 |
|
|
|
2.64 |
|
|
Noninterest-bearing deposits |
|
|
7,673 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,577 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
1,021 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,128 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
58,582 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59,115 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity |
|
|
6,415 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,469 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
64,997 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65,584 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest spread |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.04 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.02 |
|
Contribution of interest-free funds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.37 |
|
|
Net interest income/margin on earning assets |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
493,499 |
|
|
|
3.39 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
492,483 |
|
|
|
3.39 |
% |
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Includes nonaccrual loans. |
|
** |
|
Includes available for sale securities at amortized cost. |
- 88 -
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
Incorporated by reference to the discussion contained under the caption Taxable-equivalent
Net Interest Income in Part I, Item 2, Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures.
(a) Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures. Based upon their evaluation of the
effectiveness of M&Ts disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)), Robert G. Wilmers, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, and
René F. Jones, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, concluded that M&Ts
disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of June 30, 2009.
(b) Changes in internal control over financial reporting. M&T regularly assesses the adequacy
of its internal control over financial reporting and enhances its controls in response to internal
control assessments and internal and external audit and regulatory recommendations. No changes in
internal control over financial reporting have been identified in connection with the evaluation of
disclosure controls and procedures during the quarter ended June 30, 2009 that have materially
affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, M&Ts internal control over financial
reporting.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings.
M&T and its subsidiaries are subject in the normal course of business to various pending and
threatened legal proceedings in which claims for monetary damages are asserted. Management, after
consultation with legal counsel, does not anticipate that the aggregate ultimate liability arising
out of litigation pending against M&T or its subsidiaries will be material to M&Ts consolidated
financial position, but at the present time is not in a position to determine whether such
litigation will have a material adverse effect on M&Ts consolidated results of operations in any
future reporting period.
Item 1A. Risk Factors.
There have been no material changes in risk factors relating to M&T to those disclosed in
response to Item 1A. to Part I of Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.
- 89 -
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.
(a)-(b) Not applicable.
(c)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(d)Maximum |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(c)Total |
|
|
Number (or |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Approximate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Dollar Value) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(or Units) |
|
|
of Shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchased |
|
|
(or Units) |
|
|
|
(a)Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
as Part of |
|
|
that may yet |
|
|
|
Number |
|
|
(b)Average |
|
|
Publicly |
|
|
be Purchased |
|
|
|
of Shares |
|
|
Price Paid |
|
|
Announced |
|
|
Under the |
|
|
|
(or Units) |
|
|
per Share |
|
|
Plans or |
|
|
Plans or |
|
Period |
|
Purchased(1) |
|
|
(or Unit) |
|
|
Programs |
|
|
Programs (2) |
|
|
April 1 -
April 30, 2009 |
|
|
13,286 |
|
|
$ |
48.18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,181,500 |
|
|
May 1 -
May 31, 2009 |
|
|
58,022 |
|
|
|
54.29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,181,500 |
|
|
June 1 -
June 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,181,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
71,308 |
|
|
$ |
53.15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The total number of shares purchased during the periods indicated includes shares deemed
to have been received from employees who exercised stock options by attesting to previously
acquired common shares in satisfaction of the exercise price, as is permitted under M&Ts
stock option plans. |
|
(2) |
|
On February 22, 2007, M&T announced a program to purchase up to 5,000,000 shares of its
common stock. No shares were purchased under such program during the periods indicated. |
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities.
(Not applicable.)
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.
Information concerning the matters submitted to a vote of stockholders at M&Ts Annual Meeting
of Stockholders held on April 21, 2009 was previously reported in response to Item 4 of Part II of
M&Ts Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009.
Item 5. Other Information.
(None.)
- 90 -
Item 6. Exhibits.
The following exhibits are filed as a part of this report.
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
No. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
Restated Certificate of Incorporation of M&T Bank Corporation dated
May 22, 2009. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Form 8-K dated May
28, 2009 (File No. 1-9861). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.1 |
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer under Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Filed herewith. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.2 |
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer under Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Filed herewith. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.1 |
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer under 18 U.S.C. §1350 pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Filed herewith. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.2 |
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer under 18 U.S.C. §1350 pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Filed herewith. |
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M&T BANK CORPORATION
|
|
Date: August 4, 2009 |
By: |
/s/ René F. Jones
|
|
|
|
René F. Jones |
|
|
|
Executive Vice President
and Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
- 91 -
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
No. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
Restated Certificate of Incorporation of M&T Bank Corporation dated May 22,
2009. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Form 8-K dated May 28, 2009 (File
No. 1-9861). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.1 |
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer under Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002. Filed herewith. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.2 |
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer under Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002. Filed herewith. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.1 |
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer under 18 U.S.C. §1350 pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Filed herewith. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.2 |
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer under 18 U.S.C. §1350 pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Filed herewith. |
- 92 -
exv31w1
EXHIBIT 31.1
CERTIFICATIONS
I, Robert G. Wilmers, certify that:
1. |
|
I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of M&T Bank Corporation; |
2. |
|
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report; |
3. |
|
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report; |
4. |
|
The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: |
a) |
|
designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating
to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; |
b) |
|
designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over
financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance
regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements
for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; |
c) |
|
evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
and |
d) |
|
disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial
reporting. |
5. |
|
The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions): |
a) |
|
all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal
control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and |
b) |
|
any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting. |
Date: August 4, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ Robert G. Wilmers |
|
|
|
|
Robert G. Wilmers
|
|
|
|
|
Chairman of the Board and |
|
|
|
|
Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
exv31w2
EXHIBIT 31.2
CERTIFICATIONS
I, René F. Jones, certify that:
1. |
|
I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of M&T Bank Corporation; |
2. |
|
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report; |
3. |
|
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report; |
4. |
|
The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: |
a) |
|
designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating
to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; |
b) |
|
designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over
financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance
regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements
for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; |
c) |
|
evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
and |
d) |
|
disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial
reporting. |
5. |
|
The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions): |
a) |
|
all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal
control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and |
b) |
|
any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting. |
Date: August 4, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ René F. Jones |
|
|
|
|
René F. Jones
|
|
|
|
|
Executive Vice President |
|
|
|
|
and Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
exv32w1
EXHIBIT 32.1
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER UNDER 18 U.S.C. §1350
I, Robert G. Wilmers, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of M&T Bank Corporation,
certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:
|
(1) |
|
the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of M&T Bank Corporation for the
quarterly period ended June 30, 2009 (the Report) fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and |
|
(2) |
|
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of M&T
Bank Corporation. |
The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 and is not being
filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
/s/ Robert G. Wilmers
Robert G. Wilmers
August 4, 2009
A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form
within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided
to M&T Bank Corporation and will be retained by M&T Bank Corporation and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
exv32w2
EXHIBIT 32.2
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER UNDER 18 U.S.C. §1350
I, René F. Jones, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of M&T Bank Corporation,
certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:
|
(1) |
|
the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of M&T Bank Corporation for the
quarterly period ended June 30, 2009 (the Report) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and |
|
(2) |
|
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of M&T
Bank Corporation. |
The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 and is not being
filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
/s/ René F. Jones
René F. Jones
August 4, 2009
A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form
within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided
to M&T Bank Corporation and will be retained by M&T Bank Corporation and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.