e10vq
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2011
or
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
Commission File Number 1-9861
M&T BANK CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
New York
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
16-0968385
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.) |
|
|
|
One M & T Plaza
Buffalo, New York
(Address of principal
executive offices)
|
|
14203
(Zip code) |
(716) 842-5445
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
þ Yes o No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). þ Yes
o No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of large accelerated
filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
(Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer þ
|
|
Accelerated filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
|
Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by checkmark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act). o Yes þ No
Number of shares of the registrants Common Stock, $0.50 par value, outstanding as of the close of
business on July 29, 2011: 125,599,926 shares.
M&T BANK CORPORATION
FORM 10-Q
For the Quarterly Period Ended June 30, 2011
- 2 -
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements.
M&T BANK CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
Dollars in thousands, except per share |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks |
|
$ |
1,297,335 |
|
|
|
908,755 |
|
Interest-bearing deposits at banks |
|
|
2,275,450 |
|
|
|
101,222 |
|
Federal funds sold |
|
|
35,580 |
|
|
|
25,000 |
|
Agreement to resell securities |
|
|
380,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Trading account |
|
|
502,986 |
|
|
|
523,834 |
|
Investment securities (includes pledged securities that can
be sold or repledged of $2,040,940 at June 30, 2011;
$1,937,817 at December 31, 2010) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available for sale (cost: $5,026,881 at June 30, 2011;
$5,494,377 at December 31, 2010) |
|
|
4,890,489 |
|
|
|
5,413,492 |
|
Held to maturity (fair value: $1,143,496 at June 30, 2011;
$1,225,253 at December 31, 2010) |
|
|
1,219,686 |
|
|
|
1,324,339 |
|
Other (fair value: $382,090 at June 30, 2011;
$412,709 at December 31, 2010) |
|
|
382,090 |
|
|
|
412,709 |
|
|
Total investment securities |
|
|
6,492,265 |
|
|
|
7,150,540 |
|
|
Loans and leases |
|
|
58,844,512 |
|
|
|
52,315,942 |
|
Unearned discount |
|
|
(303,283 |
) |
|
|
(325,560 |
) |
|
Loans and leases, net of unearned discount |
|
|
58,541,229 |
|
|
|
51,990,382 |
|
Allowance for credit losses |
|
|
(907,589 |
) |
|
|
(902,941 |
) |
|
Loans and leases, net |
|
|
57,633,640 |
|
|
|
51,087,441 |
|
|
Premises and equipment |
|
|
567,107 |
|
|
|
435,837 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
3,524,625 |
|
|
|
3,524,625 |
|
Core deposit and other intangible assets |
|
|
275,057 |
|
|
|
125,917 |
|
Accrued interest and other assets |
|
|
4,743,109 |
|
|
|
4,138,092 |
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
77,727,154 |
|
|
|
68,021,263 |
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest-bearing deposits |
|
$ |
18,598,828 |
|
|
|
14,557,568 |
|
NOW accounts |
|
|
1,687,184 |
|
|
|
1,393,349 |
|
Savings deposits |
|
|
30,712,851 |
|
|
|
26,431,281 |
|
Time deposits |
|
|
7,678,799 |
|
|
|
5,817,170 |
|
Deposits at Cayman Islands office |
|
|
551,553 |
|
|
|
1,605,916 |
|
|
Total deposits |
|
|
59,229,215 |
|
|
|
49,805,284 |
|
|
Federal funds purchased and agreements
to repurchase securities |
|
|
452,091 |
|
|
|
866,555 |
|
Other short-term borrowings |
|
|
115,053 |
|
|
|
80,877 |
|
Accrued interest and other liabilities |
|
|
1,557,685 |
|
|
|
1,070,701 |
|
Long-term borrowings |
|
|
7,128,916 |
|
|
|
7,840,151 |
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
68,482,960 |
|
|
|
59,663,568 |
|
|
Shareholders equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred
stock, $1.00 par, 1,000,000 shares authorized; Issued and
outstanding: Liquidation preference of $1,000 per share: 381,500
shares at June 30, 2011 and 778,000 shares at December 31, 2010; Liquidation preference of $10,000 per share: 50,000 shares at June 30, 2011 and none at December 31, 2010 |
|
|
860,901 |
|
|
|
740,657 |
|
Common stock, $.50 par, 250,000,000 shares authorized,
125,554,637 shares issued at June 30, 2011;
120,396,611 shares issued at December 31, 2010 |
|
|
62,777 |
|
|
|
60,198 |
|
Common stock issuable, 67,634 shares at June 30, 2011;
71,345 shares at December 31, 2010 |
|
|
4,030 |
|
|
|
4,189 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
2,800,002 |
|
|
|
2,398,615 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
5,745,253 |
|
|
|
5,426,701 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net |
|
|
(228,769 |
) |
|
|
(205,220 |
) |
Treasury stock common, at cost none at June 30, 2011;
693,974 shares at December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(67,445 |
) |
|
Total shareholders equity |
|
|
9,244,194 |
|
|
|
8,357,695 |
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
|
$ |
77,727,154 |
|
|
|
68,021,263 |
|
|
- 3 -
M&T BANK CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended June 30 |
|
|
Six months ended June 30 |
|
In thousands, except per share |
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Interest income |
|
Loans and leases, including fees |
|
$ |
624,247 |
|
|
|
596,919 |
|
|
$ |
1,218,279 |
|
|
|
1,185,046 |
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits at banks |
|
|
479 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
515 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
Federal funds sold |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
Agreements to resell securities |
|
|
127 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
128 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
Trading account |
|
|
282 |
|
|
|
110 |
|
|
|
670 |
|
|
|
193 |
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fully taxable |
|
|
60,827 |
|
|
|
85,232 |
|
|
|
131,489 |
|
|
|
170,879 |
|
|
|
|
|
Exempt from federal taxes |
|
|
2,281 |
|
|
|
2,507 |
|
|
|
4,627 |
|
|
|
5,017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest income |
|
|
688,253 |
|
|
|
684,784 |
|
|
|
1,355,736 |
|
|
|
1,361,170 |
|
|
Interest expense |
|
NOW accounts |
|
|
274 |
|
|
|
219 |
|
|
|
476 |
|
|
|
419 |
|
|
|
|
|
Savings deposits |
|
|
20,757 |
|
|
|
21,464 |
|
|
|
39,996 |
|
|
|
41,913 |
|
|
|
|
|
Time deposits |
|
|
19,310 |
|
|
|
26,254 |
|
|
|
38,381 |
|
|
|
55,700 |
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits at Cayman Islands office |
|
|
193 |
|
|
|
376 |
|
|
|
587 |
|
|
|
701 |
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term borrowings |
|
|
147 |
|
|
|
726 |
|
|
|
639 |
|
|
|
1,613 |
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term borrowings |
|
|
61,370 |
|
|
|
68,518 |
|
|
|
120,651 |
|
|
|
137,263 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest expense |
|
|
102,051 |
|
|
|
117,557 |
|
|
|
200,730 |
|
|
|
237,609 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
|
586,202 |
|
|
|
567,227 |
|
|
|
1,155,006 |
|
|
|
1,123,561 |
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for credit losses |
|
|
63,000 |
|
|
|
85,000 |
|
|
|
138,000 |
|
|
|
190,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income after provision for credit losses |
|
|
523,202 |
|
|
|
482,227 |
|
|
|
1,017,006 |
|
|
|
933,561 |
|
|
Other income |
|
Mortgage banking revenues |
|
|
42,151 |
|
|
|
47,084 |
|
|
|
87,307 |
|
|
|
88,560 |
|
|
|
|
|
Service charges on deposit accounts |
|
|
119,716 |
|
|
|
128,976 |
|
|
|
229,447 |
|
|
|
249,271 |
|
|
|
|
|
Trust income |
|
|
75,592 |
|
|
|
30,169 |
|
|
|
104,913 |
|
|
|
61,097 |
|
|
|
|
|
Brokerage services income |
|
|
14,926 |
|
|
|
12,788 |
|
|
|
29,222 |
|
|
|
25,894 |
|
|
|
|
|
Trading account and foreign exchange gains |
|
|
6,798 |
|
|
|
3,797 |
|
|
|
15,077 |
|
|
|
8,496 |
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on bank investment securities |
|
|
110,744 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
150,097 |
|
|
|
469 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total other-than-temporary impairment (OTTI) losses |
|
|
(33,211 |
) |
|
|
(21,079 |
) |
|
|
(42,725 |
) |
|
|
(50,566 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Portion of OTTI losses recognized in other
comprehensive income (before taxes) |
|
|
6,681 |
|
|
|
(1,301 |
) |
|
|
154 |
|
|
|
1,384 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net OTTI losses recognized in earnings |
|
|
(26,530 |
) |
|
|
(22,380 |
) |
|
|
(42,571 |
) |
|
|
(49,182 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in earnings of Bayview Lending Group LLC |
|
|
(5,223 |
) |
|
|
(6,179 |
) |
|
|
(11,901 |
) |
|
|
(11,893 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other revenues from operations |
|
|
163,482 |
|
|
|
79,292 |
|
|
|
254,485 |
|
|
|
158,551 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income |
|
|
501,656 |
|
|
|
273,557 |
|
|
|
816,076 |
|
|
|
531,263 |
|
|
Other expense |
|
Salaries and employee benefits |
|
|
300,178 |
|
|
|
245,861 |
|
|
|
566,268 |
|
|
|
509,907 |
|
|
|
|
|
Equipment and net occupancy |
|
|
59,670 |
|
|
|
55,431 |
|
|
|
116,333 |
|
|
|
110,832 |
|
|
|
|
|
Printing, postage and supplies |
|
|
9,723 |
|
|
|
8,549 |
|
|
|
18,925 |
|
|
|
17,592 |
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of core deposit and other intangible assets |
|
|
14,740 |
|
|
|
14,833 |
|
|
|
27,054 |
|
|
|
31,308 |
|
|
|
|
|
FDIC assessments |
|
|
26,609 |
|
|
|
21,608 |
|
|
|
45,703 |
|
|
|
42,956 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other costs of operations |
|
|
165,975 |
|
|
|
129,786 |
|
|
|
302,183 |
|
|
|
252,835 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other expense |
|
|
576,895 |
|
|
|
476,068 |
|
|
|
1,076,466 |
|
|
|
965,430 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before taxes |
|
|
447,963 |
|
|
|
279,716 |
|
|
|
756,616 |
|
|
|
499,394 |
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes |
|
|
125,605 |
|
|
|
90,967 |
|
|
|
227,985 |
|
|
|
159,690 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
322,358 |
|
|
|
188,749 |
|
|
$ |
528,631 |
|
|
|
339,704 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income available to common shareholders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
297,164 |
|
|
|
173,588 |
|
|
$ |
487,283 |
|
|
|
310,026 |
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
297,179 |
|
|
|
173,597 |
|
|
|
487,308 |
|
|
|
310,037 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per common share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
2.43 |
|
|
|
1.47 |
|
|
$ |
4.04 |
|
|
|
2.63 |
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
2.42 |
|
|
|
1.46 |
|
|
|
4.02 |
|
|
|
2.61 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends per common share |
|
$ |
.70 |
|
|
|
.70 |
|
|
$ |
1.40 |
|
|
|
1.40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average common shares outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
122,181 |
|
|
|
118,054 |
|
|
|
120,699 |
|
|
|
117,910 |
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
122,796 |
|
|
|
118,878 |
|
|
|
121,332 |
|
|
|
118,569 |
|
- 4 -
M&T BANK CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30 |
|
In thousands |
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
528,631 |
|
|
|
339,704 |
|
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash
provided by operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for credit losses |
|
|
138,000 |
|
|
|
190,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization of premises and equipment |
|
|
38,370 |
|
|
|
34,045 |
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of capitalized servicing rights |
|
|
26,742 |
|
|
|
28,908 |
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of core deposit and other intangible assets |
|
|
27,054 |
|
|
|
31,308 |
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for deferred income taxes |
|
|
(18,201 |
) |
|
|
(22,923 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Asset write-downs |
|
|
48,032 |
|
|
|
51,510 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net (gain) loss on sales of assets |
|
|
(181,318 |
) |
|
|
1,420 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in accrued interest receivable, payable |
|
|
4,035 |
|
|
|
(2,248 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net change in other accrued income and expense |
|
|
23,766 |
|
|
|
155,403 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in loans originated for sale |
|
|
167,857 |
|
|
|
227,734 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in trading account assets and liabilities |
|
|
60,210 |
|
|
|
(6,091 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
863,178 |
|
|
|
1,028,770 |
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities |
|
Proceeds
from sales of investment securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available for sale |
|
|
1,909,223 |
|
|
|
14,870 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
71,729 |
|
|
|
49,463 |
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds
from maturities of investment securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available for sale |
|
|
751,314 |
|
|
|
729,562 |
|
|
|
|
|
Held to maturity |
|
|
114,913 |
|
|
|
77,524 |
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of
investment securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available for sale |
|
|
(1,609,272 |
) |
|
|
(401,246 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Held to maturity |
|
|
(13,151 |
) |
|
|
(987,993 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
(1,249 |
) |
|
|
(6,781 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net (increase) decrease in loans and leases |
|
|
(454,782 |
) |
|
|
757,032 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in interest-bearing deposits at banks |
|
|
432,037 |
|
|
|
15,509 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in agreements to resell securities |
|
|
(365,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other investments, net |
|
|
(10,249 |
) |
|
|
(21,152 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Additions to capitalized servicing rights |
|
|
(6,935 |
) |
|
|
(95 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures, net |
|
|
(13,976 |
) |
|
|
(23,403 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Banks and bank holding companies |
|
|
178,940 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of Wilmington Trust Corporation preferred stock |
|
|
(330,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other, net |
|
|
186,771 |
|
|
|
40,723 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by investing activities |
|
|
840,313 |
|
|
|
244,013 |
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities |
|
Net increase in deposits |
|
|
566,316 |
|
|
|
82,464 |
|
|
|
Net decrease in short-term borrowings |
|
|
(528,035 |
) |
|
|
(283,616 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Payments on long-term borrowings |
|
|
(1,331,316 |
) |
|
|
(1,106,386 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of preferred stock |
|
|
495,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Redemption of preferred stock |
|
|
(370,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends paid common |
|
|
(173,135 |
) |
|
|
(167,090 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Dividends paid preferred |
|
|
(20,046 |
) |
|
|
(20,113 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other, net |
|
|
56,885 |
|
|
|
31,502 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used by financing activities |
|
|
(1,304,331 |
) |
|
|
(1,463,239 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
399,160 |
|
|
|
(190,456 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
933,755 |
|
|
|
1,246,342 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
1,332,915 |
|
|
|
1,055,886 |
|
|
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information |
|
Interest received during the period |
|
$ |
1,366,981 |
|
|
|
1,382,432 |
|
|
|
Interest paid during the period |
|
|
205,514 |
|
|
|
248,214 |
|
|
|
Income taxes paid during the period |
|
|
266,240 |
|
|
|
145,202 |
|
|
Supplemental schedule of noncash investing and financing activities |
|
Real estate acquired in settlement of loans
Acquisitions: |
|
$ |
45,774 |
|
|
|
141,168 |
|
|
|
Fair value of: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets acquired (noncash) |
|
|
10,666,102 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities assumed |
|
|
10,044,555 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock issued |
|
|
405,557 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retirement of Wilmington Trust Corporation preferred stock |
|
|
330,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) from consolidation of securitization trusts: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
423,865 |
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities available for sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(360,471 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Long-term borrowings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
65,419 |
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued interest and other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,025 |
|
- 5 -
M&T BANK CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common |
|
|
Additional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
comprehensive |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred |
|
|
Common |
|
|
stock |
|
|
paid-in |
|
|
Retained |
|
|
income |
|
|
Treasury |
|
|
|
|
In thousands, except per share |
|
stock |
|
|
stock |
|
|
issuable |
|
|
capital |
|
|
earnings |
|
|
(loss), net |
|
|
stock |
|
|
Total |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance January 1, 2010 |
|
$ |
730,235 |
|
|
|
60,198 |
|
|
|
4,342 |
|
|
|
2,442,947 |
|
|
|
5,076,884 |
|
|
|
(335,997 |
) |
|
|
(225,702 |
) |
|
|
7,752,907 |
|
Comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
339,704 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
339,704 |
|
Other comprehensive income, net of tax
and reclassification adjustments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gains on investment securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
136,766 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
136,766 |
|
Defined benefit plans liability adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,175 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,175 |
|
Unrealized gain on terminated cash flow hedge |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(141 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(141 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
478,504 |
|
Preferred stock cash dividends |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20,113 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20,113 |
) |
Amortization of preferred stock discount |
|
|
5,115 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,115 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repayment of management stock ownership
program receivable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,838 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,838 |
|
Stock-based compensation plans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation expense, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13,571 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,886 |
|
|
|
27,315 |
|
Exercises of stock options, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(21,997 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49,400 |
|
|
|
27,403 |
|
Directors stock plan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(232 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
787 |
|
|
|
555 |
|
Deferred compensation plans, net,
including dividend equivalents |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(265 |
) |
|
|
(292 |
) |
|
|
(96 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
604 |
|
|
|
(49 |
) |
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
914 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
914 |
|
Common stock cash dividends $1.40 per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(167,430 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(167,430 |
) |
|
Balance June 30, 2010 |
|
$ |
735,350 |
|
|
|
60,198 |
|
|
|
4,077 |
|
|
|
2,409,607 |
|
|
|
5,223,834 |
|
|
|
(197,197 |
) |
|
|
(134,025 |
) |
|
|
8,101,844 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance January 1, 2011 |
|
$ |
740,657 |
|
|
|
60,198 |
|
|
|
4,189 |
|
|
|
2,398,615 |
|
|
|
5,426,701 |
|
|
|
(205,220 |
) |
|
|
(67,445 |
) |
|
|
8,357,695 |
|
Comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
528,631 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
528,631 |
|
Other comprehensive income, net of tax
and reclassification adjustments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized losses on investment securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(27,892 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(27,892 |
) |
Defined benefit plans liability adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,288 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,288 |
|
Unrealized gain on terminated cash flow hedge |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(141 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(141 |
) |
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
196 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
196 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
505,082 |
|
Acquisition of Wilmington Trust Corporation -
common stock issued |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,348 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
403,209 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
405,557 |
|
Partial redemption of Series A preferred stock |
|
|
(370,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(370,000 |
) |
Conversion of Series B preferred stock into 433,144
shares of common stock |
|
|
(26,500 |
) |
|
|
192 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,754 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,554 |
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of Series D preferred stock |
|
|
500,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
495,000 |
|
Preferred stock cash dividends |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20,046 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20,046 |
) |
Amortization of preferred stock discount |
|
|
16,744 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16,744 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation plans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation expense, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,382 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,666 |
|
|
|
21,311 |
|
Exercises of stock options, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,948 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,106 |
|
|
|
21,170 |
|
Directors stock plan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(49 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
612 |
|
|
|
563 |
|
Deferred compensation plans, net,
including dividend equivalents |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(159 |
) |
|
|
(219 |
) |
|
|
(94 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
507 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,022 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,022 |
|
Common stock cash dividends $1.40 per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(173,195 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(173,195 |
) |
|
Balance June 30, 2011 |
|
$ |
860,901 |
|
|
|
62,777 |
|
|
|
4,030 |
|
|
|
2,800,002 |
|
|
|
5,745,253 |
|
|
|
(228,769 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,244,194 |
|
|
- 6 -
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. Significant accounting policies
The consolidated financial statements of M&T Bank Corporation (M&T) and subsidiaries (the
Company) were compiled in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) using
the accounting policies set forth in note 1 of Notes to Financial Statements included in the 2010
Annual Report. In the opinion of management, all adjustments necessary for a fair presentation
have been made and were all of a normal recurring nature.
2. Acquisitions
On May 16, 2011, M&T acquired all of the outstanding common stock of Wilmington Trust Corporation
(Wilmington Trust), headquartered in Wilmington, Delaware, in a stock-for-stock transaction.
Wilmington Trust operated 55 banking offices in Delaware and Pennsylvania at the date of
acquisition. The results of operations acquired in the Wilmington Trust transaction have been
included in the Companys financial results since May 16, 2011. Wilmington Trust shareholders
received .051372 shares of M&T common stock in exchange for each share of Wilmington Trust common
stock, resulting in M&T issuing a total of 4,694,486 common shares with an acquisition date fair
value of $406 million.
The Wilmington Trust transaction has been accounted for using the acquisition method of
accounting and, accordingly, assets acquired, liabilities assumed and consideration exchanged were
recorded at estimated fair value on the acquisition date. Assets acquired totaled approximately
$10.8 billion, including $6.4 billion of loans and leases (including approximately $3.2 billion of
commercial real estate loans, $1.4 billion of commercial loans and leases, $1.1 billion of consumer
loans and $680 million of residential real estate loans). Liabilities assumed aggregated $10.0
billion, including $8.9 billion of deposits. The common stock issued in the transaction added $406
million to M&Ts common shareholders equity. Immediately prior to the closing of the Wilmington
Trust transaction, M&T redeemed the $330 million of preferred stock issued by Wilmington Trust as
part of the Troubled Asset Relief Program Capital Purchase Program of the U.S. Department of
Treasury (U.S. Treasury). In connection with the acquisition, the Company recorded $176 million
of core deposit and other intangible assets. The core deposit and other intangible assets are
generally being amortized over periods of 5 to 7 years using an accelerated method. There was no
goodwill recorded as a result of the transaction; however, a non-taxable gain of $65 million was
realized, which represented the excess of the fair value of assets acquired less liabilities
assumed over consideration exchanged. The acquisition of Wilmington Trust forms one of the largest
banks in the Eastern United States, adding to M&Ts market-leading position in the Mid-Atlantic
region, including the leading deposit market share in Delaware.
In many cases, determining the fair value of the acquired assets and assumed liabilities
required the Company to estimate cash flows expected to result from those assets and liabilities
and to discount those cash flows at appropriate rates of interest. The most significant of these
determinations related to the fair valuation of acquired loans. For such loans, the excess of cash
flows expected at acquisition over the estimated fair value is recognized as interest income over
the remaining lives of the loans. The difference between contractually required payments at
acquisition and the cash flows expected to be collected at acquisition reflects the impact of
estimated credit losses and other factors, such as prepayments. In accordance with GAAP, there was
no carry-over of Wilmington Trusts previously established allowance for credit losses. Subsequent
decreases in the expected cash flows require the Company to evaluate the need for additions to the
Companys allowance for credit losses. Subsequent improvements in expected cash flows generally
result in the recognition of additional interest income over the then remaining lives of the loans.
- 7 -
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED
2. Acquisitions, continued
In conjunction with the Wilmington Trust acquisition, the acquired loan portfolio was
accounted for at fair value as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 16, 2011 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Contractually required principal and interest at acquisition |
|
$ |
8,336,755 |
|
Contractual
cash flows not expected to be collected |
|
|
(1,209,749 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Expected cash flows at acquisition |
|
|
7,127,006 |
|
Interest
component of expected cash flows |
|
|
(716, 576 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Basis in
acquired loans at acquisition estimated fair value |
|
$ |
6,410,430 |
|
|
|
|
|
Included in the above table is information related to loans for which there was specific evidence of credit deterioration at the
acquisition date and for which it was deemed probable that the Company would be unable to collect all contractually required principal
and interest payments (purchased impaired loans). Specifically, contractually required principal and interest, cash
flows expected to be collected and estimated fair value of purchased impaired loans were $1,419,672,000, $747,265,000 and $707,907,000, respectively.
The consideration paid for Wilmington Trusts common equity and the amounts of acquired
identifiable assets and liabilities assumed as of the acquisition date were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Purchase price: |
|
|
|
|
Value of: |
|
|
|
|
Common
shares issued (4,694,486 shares) |
|
$ |
405,557 |
|
Preferred
stock purchased from U.S. Treasury |
|
|
330,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total purchase price |
|
|
735,557 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Identifiable assets: |
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks |
|
|
178,940 |
|
Interest-bearing deposits at banks |
|
|
2,606,265 |
|
Other short-term investments |
|
|
57,817 |
|
Investment securities |
|
|
510,390 |
|
Loans and leases |
|
|
6,410,430 |
|
Core deposit and other intangibles |
|
|
176,194 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
905,006 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total identifiable assets |
|
|
10,845,042 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
Deposits |
|
|
8,864,161 |
|
Short-term borrowings |
|
|
147,752 |
|
Long-term borrowings |
|
|
600,830 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
431,812 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
10,044,555 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net gain resulting from acquisition |
|
$ |
64,930 |
|
|
|
|
|
- 8 -
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED
2. Acquisitions, continued
The following table discloses the impact of Wilmington Trust (excluding the impact of the
merger-related gain and expenses) since the acquisition on May 16, 2011 through the end of the
second quarter of 2011. The table also presents certain pro forma information as if Wilmington
Trust had been acquired on January 1, 2010. These results combine the historical results of
Wilmington Trust into the Companys consolidated statement of income and, while certain adjustments
were made for the estimated impact of certain fair valuation adjustments and other
acquisition-related activity, they are not indicative of what would have occurred had the
acquisition taken place on the indicated date. In particular, no adjustments have been made to
eliminate the amount of Wilmington Trusts provision for credit losses of $42 million in 2011 and
$283 million in 2010 or the impact of other-than-temporary impairment losses recognized by
Wilmington Trust of $5 million in 2011 and $26 million in 2010 that may not have been necessary had
the acquired loans and investment securities been recorded at fair value as of the beginning of
2010. Furthermore, expenses related to preparing for systems conversions and other costs of
integration of $41 million and the $65 million gain recorded in connection with the acquisition are
included in the 2011 periods in which such costs were incurred and gain recognized. Additionally,
the Company expects to achieve further operating cost savings and other business synergies as a
result of the acquisition which are not reflected in the pro forma amounts that follow.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual since |
|
|
Pro forma |
|
|
|
acquisition |
|
|
Six months ended |
|
|
|
through |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Total revenues (a) |
|
$ |
79,140 |
|
|
|
2,208,188 |
|
|
|
2,002,497 |
|
Net income |
|
|
3,068 |
|
|
|
480,948 |
|
|
|
189,246 |
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Represents net interest income plus other income. |
- 9 -
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED
2. Acquisitions, continued
On November 5, 2010, M&T Bank, M&Ts principal banking subsidiary, entered into a purchase and
assumption agreement with the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) to assume all of the
deposits, except certain brokered deposits, and acquire certain assets of K Bank, based in
Randallstown, Maryland. As part of the transaction, M&T Bank entered into a loss-share arrangement
with the FDIC whereby M&T Bank will be reimbursed by the FDIC for most losses it incurs on the
acquired loan portfolio. The transaction was accounted for using the acquisition method of
accounting and, accordingly, assets acquired and liabilities assumed were recorded at estimated
fair value on the acquisition date. Assets acquired in the transaction totaled approximately $556
million, including $154 million of loans and $186 million in cash, and liabilities assumed
aggregated $528 million, including $491 million of deposits. In accordance with GAAP, M&T Bank
recorded an after-tax gain on the transaction of $17 million ($28 million before taxes). The gain
reflected the amount of financial support and indemnification against loan losses that M&T Bank
obtained from the FDIC. There was no goodwill or other intangible assets recorded in connection
with this transaction. The operations obtained in the K Bank acquisition transaction did not have a
material impact on the Companys consolidated financial position or results of operations.
In connection with the Wilmington Trust and K Bank acquisitions, the Company incurred
merger-related expenses related to systems conversions and other costs of integrating and
conforming acquired operations with and into the Company. Those expenses consisted largely of
professional services and other temporary help fees associated with preparing for systems
conversions and/or integration of operations; costs related to termination of existing contractual
arrangements of Wilmington Trust to purchase various services; initial marketing and promotion
expenses designed to introduce M&T Bank to its new customers; travel costs; and printing, postage,
supplies and other costs of completing the transactions and commencing operations in new markets
and offices. There were no merger-related expenses during the three months or six months ended
June 30, 2010. The Company expects to incur additional merger-related expenses during the
remainder of 2011. As of June 30, 2011, the remaining unpaid portion of incurred merger-related
expenses was $24 million. A summary of merger-related expenses included in the consolidated
statement of income follows.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Six months ended |
|
|
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Salaries and employee benefits |
|
$ |
15,305 |
|
|
$ |
15,312 |
|
Equipment and net occupancy |
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
104 |
|
Printing, postage and supplies |
|
|
318 |
|
|
|
465 |
|
Other costs of operations |
|
|
21,348 |
|
|
|
25,410 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
36,996 |
|
|
$ |
41,291 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- 10 -
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED
3. Investment securities
The amortized cost and estimated fair value of investment securities were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
unrealized |
|
|
unrealized |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
|
cost |
|
|
gains |
|
|
losses |
|
|
fair value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities available
for sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury and federal agencies |
|
$ |
111,836 |
|
|
|
1,119 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
$ |
112,953 |
|
Obligations of states and
political subdivisions |
|
|
66,709 |
|
|
|
821 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
67,491 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Government issued or guaranteed |
|
|
2,965,034 |
|
|
|
60,965 |
|
|
|
2,981 |
|
|
|
3,023,018 |
|
Privately issued residential |
|
|
1,507,748 |
|
|
|
9,720 |
|
|
|
211,266 |
|
|
|
1,306,202 |
|
Privately issued commercial |
|
|
21,094 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,861 |
|
|
|
17,233 |
|
Collateralized debt obligations |
|
|
44,268 |
|
|
|
18,800 |
|
|
|
1,467 |
|
|
|
61,601 |
|
Other debt securities |
|
|
217,812 |
|
|
|
5,738 |
|
|
|
28,014 |
|
|
|
195,536 |
|
Equity securities |
|
|
92,380 |
|
|
|
14,526 |
|
|
|
451 |
|
|
|
106,455 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,026,881 |
|
|
|
111,689 |
|
|
|
248,081 |
|
|
|
4,890,489 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities held
to maturity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obligations of states and political
subdivisions |
|
|
184,595 |
|
|
|
4,239 |
|
|
|
149 |
|
|
|
188,685 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Government issued or guaranteed |
|
|
730,785 |
|
|
|
21,978 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
752,763 |
|
Privately issued |
|
|
292,034 |
|
|
|
357 |
|
|
|
102,615 |
|
|
|
189,776 |
|
Other debt securities |
|
|
12,272 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,272 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,219,686 |
|
|
|
26,574 |
|
|
|
102,764 |
|
|
|
1,143,496 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other securities |
|
|
382,090 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
382,090 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
6,628,657 |
|
|
|
138,263 |
|
|
|
350,845 |
|
|
$ |
6,416,075 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities available
for sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury and federal agencies |
|
$ |
61,772 |
|
|
|
1,680 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
$ |
63,434 |
|
Obligations of states and political
subdivisions |
|
|
59,921 |
|
|
|
561 |
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
60,425 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Government issued or guaranteed |
|
|
3,146,054 |
|
|
|
161,298 |
|
|
|
1,111 |
|
|
|
3,306,241 |
|
Privately issued residential |
|
|
1,677,064 |
|
|
|
10,578 |
|
|
|
252,081 |
|
|
|
1,435,561 |
|
Privately issued commercial |
|
|
25,357 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,950 |
|
|
|
22,407 |
|
Collateralized debt obligations |
|
|
95,080 |
|
|
|
24,754 |
|
|
|
9,078 |
|
|
|
110,756 |
|
Other debt securities |
|
|
310,017 |
|
|
|
26,883 |
|
|
|
38,000 |
|
|
|
298,900 |
|
Equity securities |
|
|
119,112 |
|
|
|
5,098 |
|
|
|
8,442 |
|
|
|
115,768 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,494,377 |
|
|
|
230,852 |
|
|
|
311,737 |
|
|
|
5,413,492 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities held
to maturity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obligations of states and political
subdivisions |
|
|
191,119 |
|
|
|
1,944 |
|
|
|
694 |
|
|
|
192,369 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Government issued or guaranteed |
|
|
808,108 |
|
|
|
14,061 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
822,169 |
|
Privately issued |
|
|
312,537 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
114,397 |
|
|
|
198,140 |
|
Other debt securities |
|
|
12,575 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,575 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,324,339 |
|
|
|
16,005 |
|
|
|
115,091 |
|
|
|
1,225,253 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other securities |
|
|
412,709 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
412,709 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
7,231,425 |
|
|
|
246,857 |
|
|
|
426,828 |
|
|
$ |
7,051,454 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- 11 -
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED
3. Investment securities, continued
Gross realized gains on investment securities were $111 million and $150 million for the
three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 2011. Gross realized losses were not significant
in 2011. Gross realized gains and losses on investment securities were not significant during the
three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2010. During the second quarter of 2011, the Company
sold residential mortgage-backed securities guaranteed by the Federal National Mortgage Association
(Fannie Mae) and the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (Freddie Mac)having an aggregate
amortized cost of approximately $1.0 billion which resulted in a gain of $66 million (pre-tax).
The Company also sold trust preferred securities and collateralized debt obligations during the
second quarter of 2011 having an aggregate amortized cost of $136 million and $100 million,
respectively, which resulted in gains of $25 million (pre-tax) and $20 million (pre-tax),
respectively. During the first quarter of 2011, the Company sold residential mortgage-backed
securities guaranteed by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac having an aggregate amortized cost of
approximately $484 million which resulted in a gain of $39 million (pre-tax).
The Company recognized $27 million and $43 million of pre-tax other-than-temporary impairment
losses during the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2011, respectively, related to
privately issued mortgage-backed securities. The impairment charges were recognized in light of
deterioration of real estate values and continued high levels of delinquencies and charge-offs of
underlying mortgage loans collateralizing those securities. Other-than-temporary impairment losses
on investment securities of $22 million and $49 million (pre-tax) were recognized by the Company
for the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2010. Approximately $12 million of the losses
recognized in the second quarter of 2010 related to American Depositary Shares of Allied Irish
Banks, p.l.c. (AIB ADSs) which were obtained in M&Ts acquisition of a subsidiary of AIB in 2003.
The remaining losses in 2010 related to certain privately issued residential mortgage-backed
securities and collateralized debt obligations backed by pooled trust preferred securities. The
impairment charges related to the AIB ADSs were recognized due to mounting credit and other losses
incurred by AIB and significant dilution of AIB common shareholders based on the Irish governments
significant ownership position. The impairment charges related to the privately issued residential
mortgage-backed securities were recognized in light of deterioration of housing values in the
residential real estate market and a rise in delinquencies and charge-offs of underlying mortgage
loans collateralizing those securities. The other-than-temporary impairment losses on debt
securities represent managements estimate of credit losses inherent in the securities considering
projected cash flows using assumptions of delinquency rates, loss severities, and other estimates
of future collateral performance. The following table displays changes in credit losses for debt
securities recognized in earnings for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010.
- 12 -
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED
3. Investment securities, continued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended June 30 |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Beginning balance |
|
$ |
322,719 |
|
|
|
308,017 |
|
Additions for credit losses not
previously recognized |
|
|
26,530 |
|
|
|
10,387 |
|
Reductions for increases in
cash flows |
|
|
(4,881 |
) |
|
|
(173 |
) |
Reductions for realized losses |
|
|
(46,227 |
) |
|
|
(3,968 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance |
|
$ |
298,141 |
|
|
|
314,263 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30 |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Beginning balance |
|
$ |
327,912 |
|
|
|
284,513 |
|
Additions
for credit losses not previously recognized |
|
|
42,571 |
|
|
|
37,189 |
|
Reductions
for increases in cash flows |
|
|
(5,020 |
) |
|
|
(342 |
) |
Reductions for realized losses |
|
|
(67,322 |
) |
|
|
(7,097 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance |
|
$ |
298,141 |
|
|
|
314,263 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At June 30, 2011, the amortized cost and estimated fair value of debt securities by
contractual maturity were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
|
Amortized cost |
|
|
fair value |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Debt securities available for sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due in one year or less |
|
$ |
26,403 |
|
|
|
26,521 |
|
Due after one year through five years |
|
|
119,212 |
|
|
|
121,204 |
|
Due after five years through ten years |
|
|
16,687 |
|
|
|
18,081 |
|
Due after ten years |
|
|
278,323 |
|
|
|
271,775 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
440,625 |
|
|
|
437,581 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities available
for sale |
|
|
4,493,876 |
|
|
|
4,346,453 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4,934,501 |
|
|
|
4,784,034 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt securities held to maturity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due in one year or less |
|
$ |
23,428 |
|
|
|
23,607 |
|
Due after one year through five years |
|
|
20,126 |
|
|
|
20,775 |
|
Due after five years through ten years |
|
|
134,952 |
|
|
|
138,114 |
|
Due after ten years |
|
|
18,361 |
|
|
|
18,461 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
196,867 |
|
|
|
200,957 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities held
to maturity |
|
|
1,022,819 |
|
|
|
942,539 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,219,686 |
|
|
|
1,143,496 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- 13 -
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED
3. Investment securities, continued
A summary of investment securities that as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 had been in
a continuous unrealized loss position for less than twelve months and those that had been in a
continuous unrealized loss position for twelve months or longer follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than 12 months |
|
|
12 months or more |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
Fair value |
|
|
losses |
|
|
Fair value |
|
|
losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities available for
sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury and federal agencies |
|
$ |
1,903 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obligations of states and political
subdivisions |
|
|
1,444 |
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
2,323 |
|
|
|
(33 |
) |
Mortgage-backed securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Government issued or guaranteed |
|
|
632,513 |
|
|
|
(2,937 |
) |
|
|
3,010 |
|
|
|
(44 |
) |
Privately issued residential |
|
|
146,893 |
|
|
|
(1,859 |
) |
|
|
859,930 |
|
|
|
(209,407 |
) |
Privately issued commercial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,233 |
|
|
|
(3,861 |
) |
Collateralized debt obligations |
|
|
3,039 |
|
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
|
5,544 |
|
|
|
(1,448 |
) |
Other debt securities |
|
|
51,652 |
|
|
|
(935 |
) |
|
|
101,588 |
|
|
|
(27,079 |
) |
Equity securities |
|
|
3,375 |
|
|
|
(451 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
840,819 |
|
|
|
(6,209 |
) |
|
|
989,628 |
|
|
|
(241,872 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities held to maturity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obligations of states and political
subdivisions |
|
|
22,591 |
|
|
|
(108 |
) |
|
|
451 |
|
|
|
(41 |
) |
Privately issued mortgage-backed
securities |
|
|
322 |
|
|
|
(123 |
) |
|
|
184,970 |
|
|
|
(102,492 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,913 |
|
|
|
(231 |
) |
|
|
185,421 |
|
|
|
(102,533 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
863,732 |
|
|
|
(6,440 |
) |
|
|
1,175,049 |
|
|
|
(344,405 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than 12 months |
|
|
12 months or more |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
Fair value |
|
|
losses |
|
|
Fair value |
|
|
losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities available for
sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury and federal agencies |
|
$ |
27,289 |
|
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obligations of states and political
subdivisions |
|
|
3,712 |
|
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
2,062 |
|
|
|
(39 |
) |
Mortgage-backed securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Government issued or guaranteed |
|
|
68,507 |
|
|
|
(1,079 |
) |
|
|
2,965 |
|
|
|
(32 |
) |
Privately issued residential |
|
|
61,192 |
|
|
|
(1,054 |
) |
|
|
1,057,315 |
|
|
|
(251,027 |
) |
Privately issued commercial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,407 |
|
|
|
(2,950 |
) |
Collateralized debt obligations |
|
|
12,462 |
|
|
|
(6,959 |
) |
|
|
6,004 |
|
|
|
(2,119 |
) |
Other debt securities |
|
|
2,134 |
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
88,969 |
|
|
|
(37,990 |
) |
Equity securities |
|
|
5,326 |
|
|
|
(3,721 |
) |
|
|
673 |
|
|
|
(4,721 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
180,622 |
|
|
|
(12,859 |
) |
|
|
1,180,395 |
|
|
|
(298,878 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities held to maturity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obligations of states and political
subdivisions |
|
|
76,318 |
|
|
|
(638 |
) |
|
|
467 |
|
|
|
(56 |
) |
Privately issued mortgage-backed
securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
198,140 |
|
|
|
(114,397 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
76,318 |
|
|
|
(638 |
) |
|
|
198,607 |
|
|
|
(114,453 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
256,940 |
|
|
|
(13,497 |
) |
|
|
1,379,002 |
|
|
|
(413,331 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- 14 -
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED
3. Investment securities, continued
The Company owned 387 individual investment securities with aggregate gross unrealized losses
of $351 million at June 30, 2011. Approximately $211 million of the unrealized losses pertained to
privately issued residential mortgage-backed securities with a cost basis of $1.2 billion. The
Company also had $29 million of unrealized losses on trust preferred securities issued by financial
institutions, securities backed by trust preferred securities issued by financial institutions and
other entities, and other debt securities having a cost basis of $191 million. Based on a review
of each of the remaining securities in the investment securities portfolio at June 30, 2011, with
the exception of the aforementioned securities for which other-than-temporary impairment losses
were recognized, the Company concluded that it expected to recover the amortized cost basis of its
investment. As of June 30, 2011, the Company does not intend to sell nor is it anticipated that it
would be required to sell any of its impaired investment securities. At June 30, 2011, the Company
has not identified events or changes in circumstances which may have a significant adverse effect
on the fair value of the $382 million of cost method investment securities.
4. Loans and leases and the allowance for credit losses
Interest income on acquired loans that were recorded at fair value at the acquisition date for the
three months and six months ended June 30, 2011 was approximately $69 million and $110 million,
respectively, and for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2010 was approximately $42
million and $86 million, respectively. The outstanding principal balance and the carrying amount
of such loans that is included in the consolidated balance sheet at June 30, 2011 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Outstanding principal balance |
|
$ |
10,445,425 |
|
Carrying amount |
|
|
9,268,721 |
|
Purchased impaired loans totaled $753 million at June 30, 2011, representing less than 1% of the Companys assets and $97
million at December 31, 2010, representing less than .2% of the Companys assets. Interest income
earned on purchased impaired loans was $5 million and $7 million during the three- and six-month
periods ended June 30, 2011, respectively, and $1 million
and $2 million during the three- and
six-month periods ended June 30, 2010, respectively. Other receivables considered impaired at the
time of purchase were also not material to the Companys financial statements.
- 15 -
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED
4. Loans and leases and the allowance for credit losses, continued
A summary of current, past due and nonaccrual loans as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010
were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30-89 Days |
|
|
90 Days or more |
|
|
Purchased |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current |
|
|
past due |
|
|
past due and accruing |
|
|
impaired |
|
|
Nonaccrual |
|
|
Total |
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial, financial,
leasing, etc. |
|
$ |
14,791,110 |
|
|
|
24,900 |
|
|
|
23,488 |
|
|
|
37,773 |
|
|
|
163,621 |
|
|
|
15,040,892 |
|
Real estate: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
18,900,107 |
|
|
|
104,668 |
|
|
|
85,938 |
|
|
|
226,083 |
|
|
|
234,171 |
|
|
|
19,550,967 |
|
Residential builder
and developer |
|
|
1,047,647 |
|
|
|
39,246 |
|
|
|
28,606 |
|
|
|
366,879 |
|
|
|
359,152 |
|
|
|
1,841,530 |
|
Other commercial
construction |
|
|
2,635,409 |
|
|
|
37,360 |
|
|
|
32,173 |
|
|
|
51,435 |
|
|
|
114,852 |
|
|
|
2,871,229 |
|
Residential |
|
|
5,737,580 |
|
|
|
211,506 |
|
|
|
199,109 |
|
|
|
64,327 |
|
|
|
187,471 |
|
|
|
6,399,993 |
|
Residential Alt-A |
|
|
426,437 |
|
|
|
37,050 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
107,441 |
|
|
|
570,928 |
|
Consumer: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home equity lines
and loans |
|
|
6,740,046 |
|
|
|
37,438 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,097 |
|
|
|
49,941 |
|
|
|
6,832,522 |
|
Automobile |
|
|
2,767,206 |
|
|
|
49,518 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,724 |
|
|
|
2,844,448 |
|
Other |
|
|
2,529,971 |
|
|
|
38,880 |
|
|
|
3,883 |
|
|
|
1,384 |
|
|
|
14,602 |
|
|
|
2,588,720 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
55,575,513 |
|
|
|
580,566 |
|
|
|
373,197 |
|
|
|
752,978 |
|
|
|
1,258,975 |
|
|
|
58,541,229 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30-89 Days |
|
|
90 Days or more |
|
|
Purchased |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current |
|
|
past due |
|
|
past due and accruing |
|
|
impaired |
|
|
Nonaccrual |
|
|
Total |
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial,
financial, leasing,
etc. |
|
$ |
13,088,887 |
|
|
|
96,087 |
|
|
|
16,647 |
|
|
|
2,250 |
|
|
|
186,739 |
|
|
|
13,390,610 |
|
Real estate: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
16,589,240 |
|
|
|
89,906 |
|
|
|
35,338 |
|
|
|
8,275 |
|
|
|
209,031 |
|
|
|
16,931,790 |
|
Residential builder
and developer |
|
|
891,764 |
|
|
|
30,805 |
|
|
|
9,763 |
|
|
|
72,710 |
|
|
|
346,448 |
|
|
|
1,351,490 |
|
Other commercial
construction |
|
|
2,723,399 |
|
|
|
36,420 |
|
|
|
11,323 |
|
|
|
2,098 |
|
|
|
126,641 |
|
|
|
2,899,881 |
|
Residential |
|
|
4,699,711 |
|
|
|
229,641 |
|
|
|
192,276 |
|
|
|
9,320 |
|
|
|
172,729 |
|
|
|
5,303,677 |
|
Residential Alt-A |
|
|
475,236 |
|
|
|
42,674 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
106,469 |
|
|
|
624,379 |
|
Consumer: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home equity lines
and loans |
|
|
6,472,563 |
|
|
|
38,367 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,366 |
|
|
|
43,055 |
|
|
|
6,556,351 |
|
Automobile |
|
|
2,608,230 |
|
|
|
44,604 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,892 |
|
|
|
2,684,726 |
|
Other |
|
|
2,190,353 |
|
|
|
36,689 |
|
|
|
4,246 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,190 |
|
|
|
2,247,478 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
49,739,383 |
|
|
|
645,193 |
|
|
|
269,593 |
|
|
|
97,019 |
|
|
|
1,239,194 |
|
|
|
51,990,382 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- 16 -
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED
4. Loans and leases and the allowance for credit losses, continued
Changes in the allowance for credit losses for the three months ended June 30, 2011 were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial, |
|
|
Real Estate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leasing, etc. |
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
Residential |
|
|
Consumer |
|
|
Unallocated |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning balance |
|
$ |
215,659 |
|
|
|
391,107 |
|
|
|
87,526 |
|
|
|
137,351 |
|
|
|
72,060 |
|
|
|
903,703 |
|
Provision for
credit losses |
|
|
6,870 |
|
|
|
22,735 |
|
|
|
13,654 |
|
|
|
19,852 |
|
|
|
(111 |
) |
|
|
63,000 |
|
Net charge-offs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charge-offs |
|
|
(14,923 |
) |
|
|
(15,915 |
) |
|
|
(15,872 |
) |
|
|
(24,940 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(71,650 |
) |
Recoveries |
|
|
2,273 |
|
|
|
3,184 |
|
|
|
2,033 |
|
|
|
5,046 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,536 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net charge-offs |
|
|
(12,650 |
) |
|
|
(12,731 |
) |
|
|
(13,839 |
) |
|
|
(19,894 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(59,114 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance |
|
$ |
209,879 |
|
|
|
401,111 |
|
|
|
87,341 |
|
|
|
137,309 |
|
|
|
71,949 |
|
|
|
907,589 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in the allowance for credit losses for the six months ended June 30, 2011 were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial, |
|
|
Real Estate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leasing, etc. |
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
Residential |
|
|
Consumer |
|
|
Unallocated |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning balance |
|
$ |
212,579 |
|
|
|
400,562 |
|
|
|
86,351 |
|
|
|
133,067 |
|
|
|
70,382 |
|
|
|
902,941 |
|
Provision for
credit losses |
|
|
21,812 |
|
|
|
37,510 |
|
|
|
29,495 |
|
|
|
47,616 |
|
|
|
1,567 |
|
|
|
138,000 |
|
Net charge-offs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charge-offs |
|
|
(28,950 |
) |
|
|
(40,494 |
) |
|
|
(32,039 |
) |
|
|
(53,261 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(154,744 |
) |
Recoveries |
|
|
4,438 |
|
|
|
3,533 |
|
|
|
3,534 |
|
|
|
9,887 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,392 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net charge-offs |
|
|
(24,512 |
) |
|
|
(36,961 |
) |
|
|
(28,505 |
) |
|
|
(43,374 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(133,352 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance |
|
$ |
209,879 |
|
|
|
401,111 |
|
|
|
87,341 |
|
|
|
137,309 |
|
|
|
71,949 |
|
|
|
907,589 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Despite the above allocation, the allowance for credit losses is general in nature and is
available to absorb losses from any portfolio segment. Changes in the allowance for credit losses
for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2010 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Six months ended |
|
|
|
June 30, 2010 |
|
|
June 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Beginning balance |
|
$ |
891,265 |
|
|
$ |
878,022 |
|
Provision for credit losses |
|
|
85,000 |
|
|
|
190,000 |
|
Consolidation of loan
securitization trusts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,752 |
|
Net charge-offs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charge-offs |
|
|
(105,346 |
) |
|
|
(211,385 |
) |
Recoveries |
|
|
23,748 |
|
|
|
35,278 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net charge-offs |
|
|
(81,598 |
) |
|
|
(176,107 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance |
|
$ |
894,667 |
|
|
$ |
894,667 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- 17 -
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED
4. Loans and leases and the allowance for credit losses, continued
In establishing the allowance for credit losses, the Company estimates losses attributable to
specific troubled credits identified through both normal and detailed or intensified credit review
processes and also estimates losses inherent in other loans and leases on a collective basis. For
purposes of determining the level of the allowance for credit losses, the Company evaluates its
loan and lease portfolio by loan type. The amounts of loss components in the Companys loan and
lease portfolios are determined through a loan by loan analysis of larger balance commercial and
commercial real estate loans that are in nonaccrual status and by applying loss factors to groups
of loan balances based on loan type and managements classification of such loans under the
Companys loan grading system. Measurement of the specific loss components is typically based on
expected future cash flows, collateral values and other factors that may impact the borrowers
ability to pay. In determining the allowance for credit losses, the Company utilizes a loan grading
system which is applied to all commercial and commercial real estate credits. Loan officers are
responsible for continually assigning grades to these loans based on standards outlined in the
Companys Credit Policy. Internal loan grades are also monitored by the Companys loan review
department to ensure consistency and strict adherence to the prescribed standards. Loan grades are
assigned loss component factors that reflect the Companys loss estimate for each group of loans
and leases. Factors considered in assigning loan grades and loss component factors include
borrower-specific information related to expected future cash flows and operating results,
collateral values, financial condition, payment status, and other information; levels of and trends
in portfolio charge-offs and recoveries; levels of and trends in portfolio delinquencies and
impaired loans; changes in the risk profile of specific portfolios; trends in volume and terms of
loans; effects of changes in credit concentrations; and observed trends and practices in the
banking industry. Except for consumer and residential mortgage loans that are considered smaller
balance homogenous loans and are evaluated collectively and purchased-impaired loans, the Company
considers a loan to be impaired for purposes of applying GAAP when, based on current information
and events, it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect all amounts according to the
contractual terms of the loan agreement or the loan is delinquent 90 days. Purchase-impaired loans
are considered impaired under GAAP when it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect
all cash flows expected at acquisition plus additional cash flows expected to be collected arising
from changes in estimates after acquisition. Regardless of loan type, the Company considers a loan
to be impaired if it qualifies as a troubled debt restructuring. Modified loans, including smaller
balance homogenous loans, that are considered to be troubled debt restructurings are evaluated for
impairment giving consideration to the impact of the modified loan terms on the present value of
the loans expected cash flows. The following tables provide information with respect to impaired
loans and leases as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 and for the three months and six months
ended June 30, 2011 and June 30, 2010.
- 18 -
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED
4. Loans and leases and the allowance for credit losses, continued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
Recorded |
|
|
Unpaid principal |
|
|
Related |
|
|
Recorded |
|
|
Unpaid principal |
|
|
Related |
|
|
|
investment |
|
|
balance |
|
|
allowance |
|
|
investment |
|
|
balance |
|
|
allowance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
With an allowance recorded: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial, financial, leasing, etc. |
|
$ |
94,843 |
|
|
|
137,532 |
|
|
|
32,827 |
|
|
|
121,744 |
|
|
|
170,888 |
|
|
|
40,909 |
|
Real estate: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
132,723 |
|
|
|
169,915 |
|
|
|
29,670 |
|
|
|
110,975 |
|
|
|
140,015 |
|
|
|
17,393 |
|
Residential builder and developer |
|
|
178,636 |
|
|
|
224,646 |
|
|
|
79,506 |
|
|
|
263,545 |
|
|
|
295,031 |
|
|
|
78,597 |
|
Other commercial construction |
|
|
87,407 |
|
|
|
94,610 |
|
|
|
13,073 |
|
|
|
80,934 |
|
|
|
85,432 |
|
|
|
22,067 |
|
Residential |
|
|
86,574 |
|
|
|
105,454 |
|
|
|
3,044 |
|
|
|
73,006 |
|
|
|
85,279 |
|
|
|
3,375 |
|
Residential Alt-A |
|
|
165,539 |
|
|
|
176,915 |
|
|
|
32,000 |
|
|
|
180,665 |
|
|
|
191,445 |
|
|
|
36,000 |
|
Consumer: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home equity lines and loans |
|
|
12,050 |
|
|
|
13,497 |
|
|
|
2,547 |
|
|
|
11,799 |
|
|
|
13,378 |
|
|
|
2,227 |
|
Automobile |
|
|
57,827 |
|
|
|
57,827 |
|
|
|
12,351 |
|
|
|
58,858 |
|
|
|
58,858 |
|
|
|
12,597 |
|
Other |
|
|
4,209 |
|
|
|
4,209 |
|
|
|
998 |
|
|
|
2,978 |
|
|
|
2,978 |
|
|
|
768 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
819,808 |
|
|
|
984,605 |
|
|
|
206,016 |
|
|
|
904,504 |
|
|
|
1,043,304 |
|
|
|
213,933 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
With no related allowance recorded: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial, financial, leasing, etc. |
|
|
75,477 |
|
|
|
100,760 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65,827 |
|
|
|
86,332 |
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
105,755 |
|
|
|
122,637 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
101,939 |
|
|
|
116,316 |
|
|
|
|
|
Residential builder and developer |
|
|
207,803 |
|
|
|
259,984 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100,799 |
|
|
|
124,383 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other commercial construction |
|
|
27,989 |
|
|
|
31,712 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46,656 |
|
|
|
50,496 |
|
|
|
|
|
Residential |
|
|
15,483 |
|
|
|
21,383 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,035 |
|
|
|
7,723 |
|
|
|
|
|
Residential Alt-A |
|
|
30,607 |
|
|
|
52,986 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,967 |
|
|
|
47,879 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
463,114 |
|
|
|
589,462 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
349,223 |
|
|
|
433,129 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial, financial, leasing, etc. |
|
|
170,320 |
|
|
|
238,292 |
|
|
|
32,827 |
|
|
|
187,571 |
|
|
|
257,220 |
|
|
|
40,909 |
|
Real estate: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
238,478 |
|
|
|
292,552 |
|
|
|
29,670 |
|
|
|
212,914 |
|
|
|
256,331 |
|
|
|
17,393 |
|
Residential builder and developer |
|
|
386,439 |
|
|
|
484,630 |
|
|
|
79,506 |
|
|
|
364,344 |
|
|
|
419,414 |
|
|
|
78,597 |
|
Other commercial construction |
|
|
115,396 |
|
|
|
126,322 |
|
|
|
13,073 |
|
|
|
127,590 |
|
|
|
135,928 |
|
|
|
22,067 |
|
Residential |
|
|
102,057 |
|
|
|
126,837 |
|
|
|
3,044 |
|
|
|
78,041 |
|
|
|
93,002 |
|
|
|
3,375 |
|
Residential Alt-A |
|
|
196,146 |
|
|
|
229,901 |
|
|
|
32,000 |
|
|
|
209,632 |
|
|
|
239,324 |
|
|
|
36,000 |
|
Consumer: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home equity lines and loans |
|
|
12,050 |
|
|
|
13,497 |
|
|
|
2,547 |
|
|
|
11,799 |
|
|
|
13,378 |
|
|
|
2,227 |
|
Automobile |
|
|
57,827 |
|
|
|
57,827 |
|
|
|
12,351 |
|
|
|
58,858 |
|
|
|
58,858 |
|
|
|
12,597 |
|
Other |
|
|
4,209 |
|
|
|
4,209 |
|
|
|
998 |
|
|
|
2,978 |
|
|
|
2,978 |
|
|
|
768 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,282,922 |
|
|
|
1,574,067 |
|
|
|
206,016 |
|
|
|
1,253,727 |
|
|
|
1,476,433 |
|
|
|
213,933 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- 19 -
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED
4. Loans and leases and the allowance for credit losses, continued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
|
June 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
recognized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
recognized |
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
recorded |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash |
|
|
recorded |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash |
|
|
|
investment |
|
|
Total |
|
|
basis |
|
|
investment |
|
|
Total |
|
|
basis |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial, financial, leasing, etc. |
|
$ |
180,000 |
|
|
|
767 |
|
|
|
754 |
|
|
|
297,364 |
|
|
|
775 |
|
|
|
765 |
|
Real estate: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
233,931 |
|
|
|
513 |
|
|
|
483 |
|
|
|
237,121 |
|
|
|
139 |
|
|
|
121 |
|
Residential builder and developer |
|
|
358,421 |
|
|
|
312 |
|
|
|
110 |
|
|
|
307,857 |
|
|
|
671 |
|
|
|
406 |
|
Other commercial construction |
|
|
107,494 |
|
|
|
142 |
|
|
|
105 |
|
|
|
49,894 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
Residential |
|
|
97,317 |
|
|
|
1,035 |
|
|
|
551 |
|
|
|
60,593 |
|
|
|
681 |
|
|
|
432 |
|
Residential Alt-A |
|
|
199,056 |
|
|
|
1,991 |
|
|
|
409 |
|
|
|
223,430 |
|
|
|
2,144 |
|
|
|
447 |
|
Consumer: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home equity lines and loans |
|
|
12,069 |
|
|
|
190 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
11,993 |
|
|
|
167 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
Automobile |
|
|
58,650 |
|
|
|
984 |
|
|
|
293 |
|
|
|
53,497 |
|
|
|
910 |
|
|
|
318 |
|
Other |
|
|
3,544 |
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
3,221 |
|
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,250,482 |
|
|
|
5,989 |
|
|
|
2,739 |
|
|
|
1,244,970 |
|
|
|
5,567 |
|
|
|
2,546 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended |
|
|
Six months ended |
|
|
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
|
June 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
recognized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
recognized |
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
recorded |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash |
|
|
recorded |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash |
|
|
|
investment |
|
|
Total |
|
|
basis |
|
|
investment |
|
|
Total |
|
|
basis |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial, financial, leasing, etc. |
|
$ |
183,482 |
|
|
|
1,774 |
|
|
|
1,755 |
|
|
|
307,404 |
|
|
|
1,230 |
|
|
|
1,220 |
|
Real estate: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
227,019 |
|
|
|
897 |
|
|
|
825 |
|
|
|
251,607 |
|
|
|
510 |
|
|
|
492 |
|
Residential builder and developer |
|
|
360,429 |
|
|
|
839 |
|
|
|
240 |
|
|
|
309,642 |
|
|
|
715 |
|
|
|
450 |
|
Other commercial construction |
|
|
117,669 |
|
|
|
652 |
|
|
|
426 |
|
|
|
51,970 |
|
|
|
401 |
|
|
|
401 |
|
Residential |
|
|
90,813 |
|
|
|
2,069 |
|
|
|
1,147 |
|
|
|
52,932 |
|
|
|
1,213 |
|
|
|
781 |
|
Residential Alt-A |
|
|
202,339 |
|
|
|
3,986 |
|
|
|
960 |
|
|
|
225,391 |
|
|
|
4,327 |
|
|
|
885 |
|
Consumer: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home equity lines and loans |
|
|
12,098 |
|
|
|
351 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
12,268 |
|
|
|
359 |
|
|
|
63 |
|
Automobile |
|
|
58,655 |
|
|
|
1,968 |
|
|
|
589 |
|
|
|
51,732 |
|
|
|
1,771 |
|
|
|
666 |
|
Other |
|
|
3,304 |
|
|
|
112 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
3,232 |
|
|
|
129 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,255,808 |
|
|
|
12,648 |
|
|
|
6,008 |
|
|
|
1,266,178 |
|
|
|
10,655 |
|
|
|
4,989 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- 20 -
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED
4. Loans and leases and the allowance for credit losses, continued
The Company utilizes a loan grading system that is applied to all commercial loans and
commercial real estate loans. Loan grades are utilized to differentiate risk within the portfolio
and consider the expectations of default for each loan. Commercial loans and commercial real
estate loans with a lower expectation of default are assigned one of ten possible pass loan
grades and are generally ascribed lower loss factors when determining the allowance for credit
losses. Loans with an elevated level of credit risk are classified as criticized and are
ascribed a higher loss factor when determining the allowance for credit losses. Criticized loans
may be classified as nonaccrual if the Company no longer expects to collect all amounts according
to the contractual terms of the loan agreement or the loan is delinquent 90 days or more. All
larger balance criticized commercial and commercial real estate loans are individually reviewed by
centralized loan review personnel each quarter to determine the appropriateness of the assigned loan grade,
including whether the loan should be reported as accruing or nonaccruing. Smaller balance criticized loans are analyzed by
business line risk management areas to ensure proper loan grade classification.
Furthermore, criticized
nonaccrual commercial loans and commercial real estate loans are considered impaired and, as a
result, specific loss allowances on such loans are established within the allowance for credit
losses to the extent appropriate in each individual instance. The following table summarizes the
loan grades applied to the various classes of the Companys commercial and commercial real estate
loans as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real Estate |
|
|
|
Commercial, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential |
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
Financial, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Builder and |
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
|
Leasing, etc. |
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
Developer |
|
|
Construction |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pass |
|
$ |
14,154,538 |
|
|
|
18,403,985 |
|
|
|
1,255,712 |
|
|
|
2,329,099 |
|
Criticized accrual |
|
|
722,733 |
|
|
|
912,811 |
|
|
|
226,666 |
|
|
|
427,278 |
|
Criticized nonaccrual |
|
|
163,621 |
|
|
|
234,171 |
|
|
|
359,152 |
|
|
|
114,852 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
15,040,892 |
|
|
|
19,550,967 |
|
|
|
1,841,530 |
|
|
|
2,871,229 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pass |
|
$ |
12,371,138 |
|
|
|
15,831,104 |
|
|
|
693,110 |
|
|
|
2,253,589 |
|
Criticized accrual |
|
|
832,733 |
|
|
|
891,655 |
|
|
|
311,932 |
|
|
|
519,651 |
|
Criticized nonaccrual |
|
|
186,739 |
|
|
|
209,031 |
|
|
|
346,448 |
|
|
|
126,641 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
13,390,610 |
|
|
|
16,931,790 |
|
|
|
1,351,490 |
|
|
|
2,899,881 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In determining the allowance for credit losses, residential real estate loans and consumer
loans are generally evaluated collectively after considering such factors as payment performance,
recent loss experience and trends related thereto. However, residential real estate loans and
outstanding balances of home equity loans and lines of credit that are more than 150 days past due
are generally evaluated for collectibility on a loan-by-loan basis giving consideration to
estimated collateral values.
The Company also measures additional losses for purchased impaired loans when it is probable that
the Company will be unable to collect all cash flows expected at acquisition plus additional cash
flows expected to be collected arising from changes in estimates after acquisition. Given the
inherent subjectivity and potential imprecision involved in determining the allocated portion of
the allowance for credit losses, the Company also provides an inherent unallocated portion of the
allowance. The unallocated portion of the allowance is intended to recognize probable losses that
are not otherwise identifiable and includes managements subjective determination of amounts
necessary to provide for the possible use of imprecise estimates in determining the allocated
portion of the allowance. The determination of the allocated
- 21 -
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED
4. Loans and leases and the allowance for credit losses, continued
portion of the allowance for credit losses is very subjective.
Factors that influence the precision in developing loss estimates for the allocated allowance impact the
level of the unallocated portion of the allowance. Such factors might include the effects of
expansion into new markets for which the
Company does not have the same degree of familiarity and experience regarding portfolio performance
in changing market conditions, the introduction of new loan and lease product types, and other
risks associated with the Companys loan portfolio that may not be specifically identifiable.
At June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the allocation of the allowance for credit losses
summarized on the basis of the Companys impairment methodology was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial, |
|
|
Real Estate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leasing, etc. |
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
Residential |
|
|
Consumer |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individually evaluated
for impairment |
|
$ |
32,656 |
|
|
|
118,545 |
|
|
|
34,000 |
|
|
|
15,473 |
|
|
$ |
200,674 |
|
Collectively evaluated
for impairment |
|
|
177,052 |
|
|
|
278,862 |
|
|
|
52,297 |
|
|
|
121,413 |
|
|
|
629,624 |
|
Purchased impaired |
|
|
171 |
|
|
|
3,704 |
|
|
|
1,044 |
|
|
|
423 |
|
|
|
5,342 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allocated |
|
$ |
209,879 |
|
|
|
401,111 |
|
|
|
87,341 |
|
|
|
137,309 |
|
|
|
835,640 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unallocated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71,949 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
907,589 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individually evaluated
for impairment |
|
$ |
40,459 |
|
|
|
114,082 |
|
|
|
39,000 |
|
|
|
15,492 |
|
|
$ |
209,033 |
|
Collectively evaluated
for impairment |
|
|
171,670 |
|
|
|
282,505 |
|
|
|
46,976 |
|
|
|
117,475 |
|
|
|
618,626 |
|
Purchased impaired |
|
|
450 |
|
|
|
3,975 |
|
|
|
375 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
4,900 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allocated |
|
$ |
212,579 |
|
|
|
400,562 |
|
|
|
86,351 |
|
|
|
133,067 |
|
|
|
832,559 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unallocated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70,382 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
902,941 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- 22 -
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED
4. Loans and leases and the allowance for credit losses, continued
The recorded investment in loans and leases summarized on the basis of the Companys
impairment methodology as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial, |
|
|
Real Estate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leasing, etc. |
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
Residential |
|
|
Consumer |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individually evaluated
for impairment |
|
$ |
169,797 |
|
|
|
717,317 |
|
|
|
293,257 |
|
|
|
72,042 |
|
|
$ |
1,252,413 |
|
Collectively
evaluated for
impairment |
|
|
14,833,322 |
|
|
|
22,902,012 |
|
|
|
6,613,337 |
|
|
|
12,187,167 |
|
|
|
56,535,838 |
|
Purchased impaired |
|
|
37,773 |
|
|
|
644,397 |
|
|
|
64,327 |
|
|
|
6,481 |
|
|
|
752,978 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
15,040,892 |
|
|
|
24,263,726 |
|
|
|
6,970,921 |
|
|
|
12,265,690 |
|
|
$ |
58,541,229 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individually evaluated
for impairment |
|
$ |
186,739 |
|
|
|
682,120 |
|
|
|
286,612 |
|
|
|
72,082 |
|
|
$ |
1,227,553 |
|
Collectively
evaluated for
impairment |
|
|
13,201,621 |
|
|
|
20,417,958 |
|
|
|
5,632,124 |
|
|
|
11,414,107 |
|
|
|
50,665,810 |
|
Purchased impaired |
|
|
2,250 |
|
|
|
83,083 |
|
|
|
9,320 |
|
|
|
2,366 |
|
|
|
97,019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
13,390,610 |
|
|
|
21,183,161 |
|
|
|
5,928,056 |
|
|
|
11,488,555 |
|
|
$ |
51,990,382 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5. Borrowings
M&T had $1.2 billion of fixed and floating rate junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures
(Junior Subordinated Debentures) outstanding at June 30, 2011 which are held by various trusts
that were issued in connection with the issuance by those trusts of preferred capital securities
(Capital Securities) and common securities (Common Securities). The proceeds from the
issuances of the Capital Securities and the Common Securities were used by the trusts to purchase
the Junior Subordinated Debentures. The Common Securities of each of those trusts are wholly owned
by M&T and are the only class of each trusts securities possessing general voting powers. The
Capital Securities represent preferred undivided interests in the assets of the corresponding
trust.
Under the Federal Reserve Boards current risk-based capital guidelines, the Capital
Securities are includable in M&Ts Tier 1 capital. The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer
Protection Act of 2010 was signed into law on July 21, 2010. One of its provisions is for a
three-year phase-in related to the exclusion of trust preferred capital securities from Tier 1
capital for large financial institutions, including M&T. That phase-in period begins on January 1,
2013.
Holders of the Capital Securities receive preferential cumulative cash distributions unless
M&T exercises its right to extend the payment of interest on the Junior Subordinated Debentures as
allowed by the terms of each such debenture, in which case payment of distributions on the
respective Capital Securities will be deferred for comparable periods. During an extended interest
period, M&T may not pay dividends or distributions on, or repurchase, redeem or acquire any shares
of its capital stock. In the event of an extended interest period exceeding twenty quarterly
periods for $350 million of Junior Subordinated Debentures due January 31, 2068, M&T must fund the
payment of accrued and unpaid interest through an alternative payment mechanism, which requires M&T
to issue common stock, non-cumulative perpetual preferred stock or warrants to purchase common
stock until M&T has raised an amount of eligible
- 23 -
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED
5. Borrowings, continued
proceeds at least equal to the aggregate amount of accrued and unpaid deferred interest on the
Junior Subordinated Debentures due January 31, 2068. In general, the agreements governing the
Capital Securities, in the aggregate, provide a full, irrevocable and unconditional guarantee by
M&T of the payment of distributions on, the redemption of, and any liquidation distribution with
respect to the Capital Securities. The obligations under such guarantee and the Capital Securities
are subordinate and junior in right of payment to all senior indebtedness of M&T.
The Capital Securities will remain outstanding until the Junior Subordinated Debentures are
repaid at maturity, are redeemed prior to maturity or are distributed in liquidation to the Trusts.
The Capital Securities are mandatorily redeemable in whole, but not in part, upon repayment at the
stated maturity dates (ranging from 2027 to 2068) of the Junior Subordinated Debentures or the
earlier redemption of the Junior Subordinated Debentures in whole upon the occurrence of one or
more events set forth in the indentures relating to the Capital Securities, and in whole or in part
at any time after an optional redemption prior to contractual maturity contemporaneously with the
optional redemption of the related Junior Subordinated Debentures in whole or in part, subject to
possible regulatory approval. In connection with the issuance of 8.50% Enhanced Trust Preferred
Securities associated with $350 million of Junior Subordinated Debentures maturing in 2068, M&T
entered into a replacement capital covenant that provides that neither M&T nor any of its
subsidiaries will repay, redeem or purchase any of the Junior Subordinated Debentures due January
31, 2068 or the 8.50% Enhanced Trust Preferred Securities prior to January 31, 2048, with certain
limited exceptions, except to the extent that, during the 180 days prior to the date of that
repayment, redemption or purchase, M&T and its subsidiaries have received proceeds from the sale of
qualifying securities that (i) have equity-like characteristics that are the same as, or more
equity-like than, the applicable characteristics of the 8.50% Enhanced Trust Preferred Securities
or the Junior Subordinated Debentures due January 31, 2068, as applicable, at the time of repayment, redemption
or purchase, and (ii) M&T has obtained the prior approval of the Federal Reserve Board, if
required.
Including the unamortized portions of purchase accounting adjustments to reflect estimated
fair value at the acquisition dates of the Common Securities of various trusts, the Junior
Subordinated Debentures associated with Capital Securities had financial statement carrying values
of $1.2 billion at each of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010.
- 24 -
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED
6. Shareholders equity
M&T is authorized to issue 1,000,000 shares of preferred stock with a $1.00 par value per share.
Preferred shares outstanding rank senior to common shares both as to dividends and liquidation
preference, but have no general voting rights.
Issued and outstanding preferred stock of M&T is presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
|
value |
|
|
value |
|
|
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
Series A (a)(d) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed Rate Cumulative Perpetual
Preferred Stock, Series A,
$1,000 liquidation preference
per share, 230,000 shares
issued and outstanding
at June 30, 2011; 600,000 shares
issued and outstanding
at December 31, 2010 |
|
$ |
223,037 |
|
|
$ |
578,630 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series B (b) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series B Mandatory Convertible
Non-cumulative Preferred
Stock, $1,000 liquidation
preference per share, 26,500
shares issued and outstanding
at December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series C (a)(c) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed Rate Cumulative Perpetual
Preferred Stock, Series C,
$1,000 liquidation preference
per share, 151,500 shares
issued and outstanding at
June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 |
|
|
137,864 |
|
|
|
135,527 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series D (e) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed Rate Non-cumulative Perpetual
Preferred Stock, Series D,
$10,000 liquidation preference
per share, 50,000 shares
issued and outstanding at
June 30, 2011 |
|
|
500,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Shares were issued as part of the Troubled Asset Relief Program Capital Purchase
Program of the U.S. Treasury. Cash proceeds were allocated between the preferred stock and a
ten-year warrant to purchase M&T common stock (Series A 1,218,522 common shares at $73.86
per share, Series C 407,542 common shares at $55.76 per share). Dividends, if declared,
will accrue and be paid quarterly at a rate of 5% per year for the first five years
following the original 2008 issuance dates and thereafter at a rate of 9% per year. The
agreement with the U.S. Treasury contains limitations on certain actions of M&T, including
the payment of quarterly cash dividends on M&Ts common stock in excess of $.70 per share,
the repurchase of its common stock during the first three years of the agreement, and the
amount and nature of compensation arrangements for certain of the Companys officers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
(b) |
|
Shares were assumed in an acquisition and a new Series B Preferred Stock was designated.
Pursuant to their terms, the shares of Series B Preferred Stock were converted into 433,144
shares of M&T common stock on April 1, 2011. The preferred stock had a stated dividend rate
of 10% per year. |
- 25 -
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED
6. Shareholders equity, continued
(c) |
|
Shares were assumed in an acquisition and a new
Series C Preferred Stock was designated. |
(d) |
|
On May 18, 2011, M&T redeemed and retired 370,000 shares of the Series A Preferred Stock.
Accelerated amortization of preferred stock discount associated with the redemption was $11.2
million. |
(e) |
|
Shares were issued on May 31, 2011. Dividends, if declared, will be paid semi-annually at a
rate of 6.875% per year. The shares are redeemable in whole or in part on or after June 15,
2016. Notwithstanding M&Ts option to redeem the shares, if an event occurs such that the
shares no longer qualify as Tier 1 Capital, M&T may redeem all of the shares within 90 days
following that occurrence. |
7. Pension plans and other postretirement benefits
The Company provides defined benefit pension and other postretirement benefits (including health
care and life insurance benefits) to qualified retired employees. Net periodic defined benefit
cost for defined benefit plans consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
Pension |
|
|
postretirement |
|
|
|
benefits |
|
|
benefits |
|
|
|
Three months ended June 30 |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
6,413 |
|
|
|
4,960 |
|
|
|
115 |
|
|
|
102 |
|
Interest cost on projected benefit
obligation |
|
|
14,086 |
|
|
|
12,032 |
|
|
|
909 |
|
|
|
785 |
|
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
(14,563 |
) |
|
|
(12,655 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of prior service cost |
|
|
(1,629 |
) |
|
|
(1,629 |
) |
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
63 |
|
Amortization of net actuarial loss |
|
|
5,165 |
|
|
|
3,455 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic benefit cost |
|
$ |
9,472 |
|
|
|
6,163 |
|
|
|
1,071 |
|
|
|
945 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
Pension |
|
|
postretirement |
|
|
|
benefits |
|
|
benefits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
11,713 |
|
|
|
9,835 |
|
|
|
240 |
|
|
|
202 |
|
Interest cost on projected benefit
obligation |
|
|
26,236 |
|
|
|
24,061 |
|
|
|
1,684 |
|
|
|
1,565 |
|
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
(27,263 |
) |
|
|
(25,443 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of prior service cost |
|
|
(3,279 |
) |
|
|
(3,279 |
) |
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
88 |
|
Amortization of net actuarial loss |
|
|
10,265 |
|
|
|
6,776 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic benefit cost |
|
$ |
17,672 |
|
|
|
11,950 |
|
|
|
1,996 |
|
|
|
1,850 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expense incurred in connection with the Companys defined contribution pension and retirement
savings plans totaled $9,890,000 and $8,775,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010,
respectively, and $20,066,000 and $20,465,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010,
respectively.
- 26 -
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED
8. Earnings per common share
The computations of basic earnings per common share follow:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Six months ended |
|
|
|
June 30 |
|
|
June 30 |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(in thousands, except per share) |
|
Income available to common
shareholders: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
322,358 |
|
|
|
188,749 |
|
|
|
528,631 |
|
|
|
339,704 |
|
Less: Preferred stock dividends (a) |
|
|
(7,184 |
) |
|
|
(10,056 |
) |
|
|
(17,682 |
) |
|
|
(20,113 |
) |
Amortization of preferred
stock discount (a) |
|
|
(13,531 |
) |
|
|
(2,605 |
) |
|
|
(16,284 |
) |
|
|
(5,162 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income available to common equity |
|
|
301,643 |
|
|
|
176,088 |
|
|
|
494,665 |
|
|
|
314,429 |
|
Less: Income attributable to unvested
stock-based compensation awards |
|
|
(4,479 |
) |
|
|
(2,500 |
) |
|
|
(7,382 |
) |
|
|
(4,403 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income available to common
shareholders |
|
$ |
297,164 |
|
|
|
173,588 |
|
|
|
487,283 |
|
|
|
310,026 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average shares outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares outstanding (including
common stock issuable) and unvested
stock-based compensation awards |
|
|
124,035 |
|
|
|
119,756 |
|
|
|
122,522 |
|
|
|
119,550 |
|
Less: Unvested stock-based
compensation awards |
|
|
(1,854 |
) |
|
|
(1,702 |
) |
|
|
(1,823 |
) |
|
|
(1,640 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average shares outstanding |
|
|
122,181 |
|
|
|
118,054 |
|
|
|
120,699 |
|
|
|
117,910 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per common share |
|
$ |
2.43 |
|
|
|
1.47 |
|
|
|
4.04 |
|
|
|
2.63 |
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Including impact of not as yet declared cumulative dividends. |
- 27 -
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED
8. Earnings per common share, continued
The computations of diluted earnings per common share follow:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Six months ended |
|
|
|
June 30 |
|
|
June 30 |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands, except per share) |
|
|
|
|
|
Net income available to common equity |
|
$ |
301,643 |
|
|
|
176,088 |
|
|
|
494,665 |
|
|
|
314,429 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Income attributable to unvested
stock-based compensation awards |
|
|
(4,464 |
) |
|
|
(2,491 |
) |
|
|
(7,357 |
) |
|
|
(4,392 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income available to common
shareholders |
|
$ |
297,179 |
|
|
|
173,597 |
|
|
|
487,308 |
|
|
|
310,037 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted weighted-average
shares outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common and unvested stock-based
compensation awards |
|
|
124,035 |
|
|
|
119,756 |
|
|
|
122,522 |
|
|
|
119,550 |
|
Less: Unvested stock-based compensation
awards |
|
|
(1,854 |
) |
|
|
(1,702 |
) |
|
|
(1,823 |
) |
|
|
(1,640 |
) |
Plus: Incremental shares from assumed
conversion of stock-based
compensation awards and
convertible preferred stock |
|
|
615 |
|
|
|
824 |
|
|
|
633 |
|
|
|
659 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted weighted-average shares
outstanding |
|
|
122,796 |
|
|
|
118,878 |
|
|
|
121,332 |
|
|
|
118,569 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per common share |
|
$ |
2.42 |
|
|
|
1.46 |
|
|
|
4.02 |
|
|
|
2.61 |
|
GAAP defines unvested share-based awards that contain nonforfeitable rights to dividends or
dividend equivalents (whether paid or unpaid) as participating securities that shall be included in
the computation of earnings per common share pursuant to the two-class method. During the
six-month periods ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, the Company issued stock-based compensation awards
in the form of restricted stock and restricted stock units, which, in accordance with GAAP, are
considered participating securities.
Stock-based compensation awards, warrants to purchase common stock of M&T and preferred stock
convertible into shares of M&T stock representing approximately 10.1 million and 10.7 million
common shares during the three-month periods ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, and 10.3
million and 11.3 million common shares during the six-month periods ended June 30, 2011 and 2010,
respectively, were not included in the computations of diluted earnings per common share because
the effect on those periods would have been antidilutive.
- 28 -
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED
9. Comprehensive income
The following table displays the components of other comprehensive income (loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30, 2011 |
|
|
|
Before-tax |
|
|
Income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
amount |
|
|
taxes |
|
|
Net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gains (losses)
on investment securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-sale (AFS)
investment securities with other-than-temporary impairment (OTTI): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized holding losses, net |
|
$ |
(11,227 |
) |
|
|
4,501 |
|
|
|
(6,726 |
) |
Less: reclassification adjustment for gains realized in net income |
|
|
3,814 |
|
|
|
(1,497 |
) |
|
|
2,317 |
|
Less: OTTI
charges recognized in net income |
|
|
(32,071 |
) |
|
|
12,587 |
|
|
|
(19,484 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change for AFS
investment securities with OTTI |
|
|
17,030 |
|
|
|
(6,589 |
) |
|
|
10,441 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AFS investment securities all other: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized holding gains, net |
|
|
77,869 |
|
|
|
(30,368 |
) |
|
|
47,501 |
|
Less: reclassification
adjustment for gains
realized in net income |
|
|
146,115 |
|
|
|
(57,257 |
) |
|
|
88,858 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change for AFS
investment securities all other |
|
|
(68,246 |
) |
|
|
26,889 |
|
|
|
(41,357 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Held-to-maturity (HTM) investment
securities with OTTI: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized holding losses, net |
|
|
(8,500 |
) |
|
|
3,336 |
|
|
|
(5,164 |
) |
Less: reclassification to income of
unrealized holding losses |
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
Less: OTTI charges recognized
in net income |
|
|
(10,500 |
) |
|
|
4,121 |
|
|
|
(6,379 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change for HTM investment
securities with OTTI |
|
|
2,012 |
|
|
|
(790 |
) |
|
|
1,222 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reclassification to income of
unrealized holding losses
on investment securities
previously transferred from AFS to HTM |
|
|
2,967 |
|
|
|
(1,165 |
) |
|
|
1,802 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized losses on investment securities |
|
|
(46,237 |
) |
|
|
18,345 |
|
|
|
(27,892 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reclassification to income for
amortization of gains on
terminated cash flow hedges |
|
|
(224 |
) |
|
|
83 |
|
|
|
(141 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation
adjustment |
|
|
313 |
|
|
|
(117 |
) |
|
|
196 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Defined benefit plans
liability adjustment |
|
|
7,058 |
|
|
|
(2,770 |
) |
|
|
4,288 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(39,090 |
) |
|
|
15,541 |
|
|
|
(23,549 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- 29 -
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED
9. Comprehensive income, continued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
Before-tax |
|
|
Income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
amount |
|
|
taxes |
|
|
Net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gains (losses)
on investment securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AFS investment securities
with OTTI: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized holding losses, net |
|
$ |
(50,566 |
) |
|
|
19,603 |
|
|
|
(30,963 |
) |
Less: OTTI charges
recognized in net income |
|
|
(49,182 |
) |
|
|
19,017 |
|
|
|
(30,165 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change for AFS investment
securities with OTTI |
|
|
(1,384 |
) |
|
|
586 |
|
|
|
(798 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AFS investment securities
all other: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized holding gains, net |
|
|
221,196 |
|
|
|
(86,386 |
) |
|
|
134,810 |
|
Less: reclassification
adjustment for losses
recognized in net income |
|
|
(135 |
) |
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
(96 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change for AFS investment
securities all other |
|
|
221,331 |
|
|
|
(86,425 |
) |
|
|
134,906 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reclassification to income of
unrealized holding losses
on investment securities
previously transferred from AFS to HTM |
|
|
4,374 |
|
|
|
(1,716 |
) |
|
|
2,658 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized gains on
investment securities |
|
|
224,321 |
|
|
|
(87,555 |
) |
|
|
136,766 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reclassification to income for
amortization of gains on
terminated cash flow hedges |
|
|
(224 |
) |
|
|
83 |
|
|
|
(141 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Defined benefit plans
liability adjustment |
|
|
3,580 |
|
|
|
(1,405 |
) |
|
|
2,175 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
227,677 |
|
|
|
(88,877 |
) |
|
|
138,800 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- 30 -
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED
9. Comprehensive income, continued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash |
|
|
currency |
|
|
Defined |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities |
|
|
flow |
|
|
translation |
|
|
benefit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
With OTTI |
|
|
All other |
|
|
hedges |
|
|
adjustment |
|
|
plans |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance January 1, 2011 |
|
$ |
(87,053 |
) |
|
|
2,332 |
|
|
|
393 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(120,892 |
) |
|
|
(205,220 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net gain (loss) during period |
|
|
11,663 |
|
|
|
(39,555 |
) |
|
|
(141 |
) |
|
|
196 |
|
|
|
4,288 |
|
|
|
(23,549 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance June 30, 2011 |
|
$ |
(75,390 |
) |
|
|
(37,223 |
) |
|
|
252 |
|
|
|
196 |
|
|
|
(116,604 |
) |
|
|
(228,769 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance January 1, 2010 |
|
$ |
(76,772 |
) |
|
|
(142,853 |
) |
|
|
674 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(117,046 |
) |
|
|
(335,997 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net gain (loss) during period |
|
|
(798 |
) |
|
|
137,564 |
|
|
|
(141 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,175 |
|
|
|
138,800 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance June 30, 2010 |
|
$ |
(77,570 |
) |
|
|
(5,289 |
) |
|
|
533 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(114,871 |
) |
|
|
(197,197 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10. Derivative financial instruments
As part of managing interest rate risk, the Company enters into interest rate swap agreements to
modify the repricing characteristics of certain portions of the Companys portfolios of earning
assets and interest-bearing liabilities. The Company designates interest rate swap agreements
utilized in the management of interest rate risk as either fair value hedges or cash flow hedges.
Interest rate swap agreements are generally entered into with counterparties that meet established
credit standards and most contain master netting and collateral provisions protecting the at-risk
party. Based on adherence to the Companys credit standards and the presence of the netting and
collateral provisions, the Company believes that the credit risk inherent in these contracts is not
significant as of June 30, 2011.
The net effect of interest rate swap agreements was to increase net interest income by $9
million and $11 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, and $19
million and $22 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Information
about interest rate swap agreements entered into for interest rate risk management purposes
summarized by type of financial instrument the swap agreements were intended to hedge follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
Notional |
|
|
Average |
|
|
average rate |
|
|
|
amount |
|
|
maturity |
|
|
Fixed |
|
|
Variable |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
(in years) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value hedges: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed rate long-term borrowings (a) |
|
$ |
900,000 |
|
|
|
5.9 |
|
|
|
6.07 |
% |
|
|
1.79 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value hedges: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed rate long-term borrowings (a) |
|
$ |
900,000 |
|
|
|
6.4 |
|
|
|
6.07 |
% |
|
|
1.84 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Under the terms of these agreements, the Company receives settlement amounts at a fixed
rate and pays at a variable rate. |
- 31 -
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED
10. Derivative financial instruments, continued
The Company utilizes commitments to sell residential and commercial real estate loans to hedge
the exposure to changes in the fair value of real estate loans held for sale. Such commitments
have generally been designated as fair value hedges. The Company also utilizes commitments to sell
real estate loans to offset the exposure to changes in fair value of certain commitments to
originate real estate loans for sale.
Derivative financial instruments used for trading purposes included interest rate contracts,
foreign exchange and other option contracts, foreign exchange forward and spot contracts, and
financial futures. Interest rate contracts entered into for trading purposes had notional values of
$13.4 billion and $12.8 billion at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively. The notional
amounts of foreign currency and other option and futures contracts entered into for trading
purposes aggregated $1.0 billion and $769 million at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010,
respectively.
Information about the fair values of derivative instruments in the Companys
consolidated balance sheet and consolidated statement of income follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset derivatives |
|
|
Liability derivatives |
|
|
|
Fair value |
|
|
Fair value |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives designated and
qualifying as hedging
instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value hedges: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swap
agreements (a) |
|
$ |
106,177 |
|
|
|
96,637 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments to sell real estate
loans (a) |
|
|
912 |
|
|
|
4,880 |
|
|
|
1,270 |
|
|
|
1,062 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
107,089 |
|
|
|
101,517 |
|
|
|
1,270 |
|
|
|
1,062 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives not designated and
qualifying as hedging
instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-related commitments to
originate real estate loans for
sale (a) |
|
|
13,558 |
|
|
|
2,827 |
|
|
|
387 |
|
|
|
583 |
|
Commitments to sell real estate
loans (a) |
|
|
1,583 |
|
|
|
10,322 |
|
|
|
5,364 |
|
|
|
1,962 |
|
Trading: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate contracts (b) |
|
|
364,064 |
|
|
|
345,632 |
|
|
|
339,440 |
|
|
|
321,461 |
|
Foreign exchange and other
option and futures contracts
(b) |
|
|
26,920 |
|
|
|
11,267 |
|
|
|
27,043 |
|
|
|
11,761 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
406,125 |
|
|
|
370,048 |
|
|
|
372,234 |
|
|
|
335,767 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivatives |
|
$ |
513,214 |
|
|
|
471,565 |
|
|
$ |
373,504 |
|
|
|
336,829 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Asset derivatives are reported in other assets and liability derivatives are reported in
other liabilities. |
|
(b) |
|
Asset derivatives are reported in trading account assets and liability derivatives are
reported in other liabilities. |
- 32 -
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED
10. Derivative financial instruments, continued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of unrealized gain (loss) recognized |
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
|
June 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
Derivative |
|
|
Hedged item |
|
|
Derivative |
|
|
Hedged item |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives in fair value
hedging relationships |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swap
agreements: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed rate time
deposits (a) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(304 |
) |
|
|
304 |
|
Fixed rate long-term
borrowings (a) |
|
|
21,945 |
|
|
|
(21,145 |
) |
|
|
43,957 |
|
|
|
(41,680 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
21,945 |
|
|
|
(21,145 |
) |
|
$ |
43,653 |
|
|
|
(41,376 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives not designated
as hedging instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate contracts (b) |
|
$ |
1,001 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(504 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange and other
option and futures contracts
(b) |
|
|
(743 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
615 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
258 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
111 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of unrealized gain (loss) recognized |
|
|
|
Six months ended |
|
|
Six months ended |
|
|
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
|
June 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
Derivative |
|
|
Hedged item |
|
|
Derivative |
|
|
Hedged item |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives in fair value
hedging relationships |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swap
agreements: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed rate time
deposits (a) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(503 |
) |
|
|
503 |
|
Fixed rate long-term
borrowings (a) |
|
|
9,540 |
|
|
|
(9,097 |
) |
|
|
56,427 |
|
|
|
(53,661 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
9,540 |
|
|
|
(9,097 |
) |
|
$ |
55,924 |
|
|
|
(53,158 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives not designated
as hedging instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate contracts (b) |
|
$ |
1,476 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(1,118 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange and other
option and futures contracts
(b) |
|
|
(1,291 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
957 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
185 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(161 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Reported as other revenues from operations. |
|
(b) |
|
Reported as trading account and foreign exchange gains. |
- 33 -
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED
10. Derivative financial instruments, continued
In addition, the Company also has commitments to sell and commitments to originate residential
and commercial real estate loans that are considered derivatives. The Company designates certain
of the commitments to sell real estate loans as fair value hedges of real estate loans held for
sale. The Company also utilizes commitments to sell real estate loans to offset the exposure to
changes in the fair value of certain commitments to originate real estate loans for sale. As a
result of these activities, net unrealized pre-tax gains related to hedged loans held for sale,
commitments to originate loans for sale and commitments to sell loans were approximately $20
million and $17 million at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively. Changes in
unrealized gains and losses are included in mortgage banking revenues and, in general, are realized
in subsequent periods as the related loans are sold and commitments satisfied.
The aggregate fair value of derivative financial instruments in a net liability position at
June 30, 2011 for which the Company was required to post collateral was $248 million. The fair
value of collateral posted for such instruments was $219 million. Certain of the Companys
derivative financial instruments contain provisions that require the Company to maintain specific
credit ratings from credit rating agencies to avoid lower collateral posting thresholds. If the
Companys debt rating were to fall below specified ratings, the counterparties to the derivative
financial instruments could demand immediate incremental collateralization on those instruments in
a net liability position. The aggregate fair value of all derivative financial instruments with such credit-risk-related contingent features in a net liability position on June
30, 2011 was $93 million, for which the Company had posted collateral of $58 million in the normal course of business.
If the credit-risk-related contingent features were triggered on June
30, 2011, the maximum amount of additional collateral the Company would have been required to post
to counterparties was $35 million.
The Companys credit exposure with respect to the estimated fair value as of June 30, 2011 of
interest rate swap agreements used for managing interest rate risk has been substantially mitigated
through master netting agreements with trading account interest rate contracts with the same
counterparties as well as counterparty postings of $61 million of collateral with the Company.
Trading account interest rate swap agreements entered into with customers are subject to the
Companys credit standards and often contain collateral provisions.
11. Variable interest entities and asset securitizations
In accordance with GAAP, the Company determined that it was the primary beneficiary of a
residential mortgage loan securitization trust considering its role as servicer and its retained
subordinated interests in the trust. As a result, the Company has included the one-to-four family
residential mortgage loans that were included in the trust in its consolidated financial
statements. At June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the carrying values of the loans in the
securitization trust were $225 million and $265 million, respectively. The outstanding principal
amount of mortgage-backed securities issued by the qualified special purpose trust that was held by
parties unrelated to M&T at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 was $36 million and $40 million,
respectively. Because the transaction was non-recourse, the Companys maximum exposure to loss as
a result of its association with the trust at June 30, 2011 is limited to realizing the carrying
value of the loans less the amount of the mortgage-backed securities held by third parties.
As described in note 5, M&T has issued junior subordinated debentures payable to various
trusts that have issued Capital Securities. M&T owns the common securities of those trust entities.
The Company is not considered to be the primary beneficiary of those entities and, accordingly, the
trusts are not included in the Companys consolidated financial statements. At June 30, 2011
- 34 -
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED
11. Variable interest entities and asset securitizations, continued
and
December 31, 2010, the Company included the junior subordinated debentures as long-term
borrowings in its consolidated balance sheet. The Company has recognized $34 million in other
assets for its investment in the common
securities of the trusts that will be concomitantly repaid to M&T by the respective trust from the
proceeds of M&Ts repayment of the junior subordinated debentures associated with preferred capital
securities described in note 5.
The Company has invested as a limited partner in various real estate partnerships that
collectively had total assets of approximately $1.5 billion and $1.1 billion at June 30, 2011 and
December 31, 2010, respectively. Those partnerships generally construct or acquire properties for
which the investing partners are eligible to receive certain federal
income tax credits in accordance with government guidelines. Such investments may also provide tax deductible losses to
the partners. The partnership investments also assist the Company in achieving its community
reinvestment initiatives. As a limited partner, there is no recourse to the Company by creditors of
the partnerships. However, the tax credits that result from the Companys investments in such
partnerships are generally subject to recapture should a partnership fail to comply with the
respective government regulations. The Companys maximum exposure to loss of its investments in
such partnerships was $246 million, including $63 million of unfunded commitments, at June 30, 2011
and $258 million, including $81 million of unfunded commitments, at December 31, 2010. The Company
has not provided financial or other support to the partnerships that was not contractually
required. Management currently estimates that no material losses are probable as a result of the
Companys involvement with such entities. In accordance with the accounting provisions for
variable interest entities, the Company, in its position as limited partner, does not direct the
activities that most significantly impact the economic performance of the partnerships and,
therefore, the partnership entities are not included in the Companys consolidated financial
statements.
12. Fair value measurements
GAAP permits an entity to choose to measure eligible financial instruments and other items at fair
value. The Company has not made any fair value elections at June 30, 2011.
Pursuant to GAAP, fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset
or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the
measurement date. A three-level hierarchy exists in GAAP for fair value measurements based upon the
inputs to the valuation of an asset or liability.
|
|
|
Level 1 Valuation is based on quoted prices in active markets for identical
assets and liabilities. |
|
|
|
|
Level 2 Valuation is determined from quoted prices for similar assets or
liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in
markets that are not active or by model-based techniques in which all significant inputs
are observable in the market. |
|
|
|
|
Level 3 Valuation is derived from model-based and other techniques in which
at least one significant input is unobservable and which may be based on the Companys own
estimates about the assumptions that market participants would use to value the asset or
liability. |
When available, the Company attempts to use quoted market prices in active markets to
determine fair value and classifies such items as Level 1 or Level 2. If quoted market prices in
active markets are not available, fair value is often determined using model-based techniques
incorporating various assumptions including interest rates, prepayment speeds and credit losses.
Assets and
- 35 -
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED
12. Fair value measurements, continued
liabilities valued using model-based techniques are classified as either Level 2 or
Level 3, depending on the lowest level classification of an input that is
considered significant to the overall valuation. The following is a description of the valuation
methodologies used for the Companys assets and liabilities that are measured on a recurring basis
at estimated fair value.
Trading account assets and liabilities
Trading account assets and liabilities consist primarily of interest rate swap agreements and
foreign exchange contracts with customers who require such services with offsetting positions with
third parties to minimize the Companys risk with respect to such transactions. The Company
generally determines the fair value of its derivative trading account assets and liabilities using
externally developed pricing models based on market observable inputs and therefore classifies such
valuations as Level 2. Mutual funds held in connection with deferred compensation arrangements
have been classified as Level 1 valuations. Valuations of investments in municipal and other bonds
can generally be obtained through reference to quoted prices in less active markets for the same or
similar securities or through model-based techniques in which all significant inputs are
observable and, therefore, such valuations have been classified as Level 2.
Investment securities available for sale
The majority of the Companys available-for-sale investment securities have been valued by
reference to prices for similar securities or through model-based techniques in which all
significant inputs are observable and, therefore, such valuations have been classified as Level 2.
Certain investments in mutual funds and equity securities are actively traded and therefore have
been classified as Level 1 valuations.
Trading activity in privately issued mortgage-backed securities has been limited. The markets
for such securities were generally characterized by a sharp reduction of non-agency mortgage-backed
securities issuances, a significant reduction in trading volumes and wide bid-ask spreads.
Although estimated prices were generally obtained for such securities, the Company was
significantly restricted in the level of market observable assumptions used in the valuation of its
privately issued mortgage-backed securities portfolio. Specifically, market assumptions regarding
credit adjusted cash flows and liquidity influences on discount rates were difficult to observe at
the individual bond level. Because of the inactivity in the markets and the lack of observable
valuation inputs, the Company has classified the valuation of privately issued mortgage-backed
securities as Level 3.
GAAP provides guidance for estimating fair value when the volume and level of trading activity
for an asset or liability have significantly decreased. The Company has concluded that there has
been a significant decline in the volume and level of activity in the market for privately issued
mortgage-backed securities. Therefore, the Company supplemented its determination of fair value
for many of its privately issued mortgage-backed securities by obtaining pricing indications from
two independent sources at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010. However, the Company could not
readily ascertain that the basis of such valuations could be ascribed to orderly and observable
trades in the market for privately issued residential mortgage-backed securities. As a result, the
Company also performed internal modeling to estimate the cash flows and fair value of privately
issued residential mortgage-backed securities with an amortized cost basis of $1.4 billion at June
30, 2011 and $1.5 billion at December 31, 2010. The Companys internal modeling techniques
included discounting estimated bond-specific cash flows using assumptions about cash flows
associated with loans underlying each of the bonds, including estimates about the timing and amount
of credit losses and prepayments. In estimating those cash flows, the Company used assumptions as
to future delinquency, defaults, further home price
depreciation and loss rates. Differences between internal model valuations and external pricing
indications were generally
- 36 -
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED
12. Fair value measurements, continued
considered to be reflective of the lack of liquidity in the market for
privately issued mortgage-backed securities given the nature of the cash flow modeling performed in
the Companys assessment of value. To determine the point within the range of potential values
that was most representative of fair value under current market conditions for each of the bonds,
the Company computed values based on judgmentally applied weightings of the internal model
valuations and the indications obtained from the average of the two independent pricing sources.
Weightings applied to internal model valuations generally ranged from zero to 40% depending on bond
structure and collateral type, with prices for bonds in non-senior tranches generally receiving
lower weightings on the internal model results and senior bonds receiving a higher model weighting.
At June 30, 2011, weighted-average reliance on internal model pricing for the bonds modeled was
34% with a 66% average weighting placed on the values provided by the independent sources. The
Company concluded its estimate of fair value for the $1.4 billion of privately issued residential
mortgage-backed securities to approximate $1.2 billion, which implies a weighted-average market
yield based on reasonably likely cash flows of 7.6%. Other valuations of privately issued
residential mortgage-backed securities were determined by reference to independent pricing sources
without adjustment.
Included in collateralized debt obligations are securities backed by trust preferred
securities issued by financial institutions and other entities. Given the severe disruption in the
credit markets and the wide disparity in observable trade information, the Company could not obtain
pricing indications for many of these securities from its two primary independent pricing sources.
The Company, therefore, performed internal modeling to estimate the cash flows and fair value of
its portfolio of securities backed by trust preferred securities at June 30, 2011 and December 31,
2010. The modeling techniques included discounting estimated cash flows using bond-specific
assumptions about defaults, deferrals and prepayments of the trust preferred securities underlying
each bond. The estimation of cash flows included assumptions as to future collateral defaults and
related loss severities. The resulting cash flows were then discounted by reference to market
yields observed in the single-name trust preferred securities market. At June 30, 2011, the total
amortized cost and fair value of securities backed by trust preferred securities issued by
financial institutions and other entities was $44 million and $62 million, respectively, and at
December 31, 2010 were $95 million and $111 million, respectively. Privately issued
mortgage-backed securities and securities backed by trust preferred securities issued by financial
institutions and other entities constituted all of the available-for-sale investment securities
classified as Level 3 valuations as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010.
Real estate loans held for sale
The Company utilizes commitments to sell real estate loans to hedge the exposure to changes in fair
value of real estate loans held for sale. The carrying value of hedged real estate loans held for
sale includes changes in estimated fair value during the hedge period. Typically, the Company
attempts to hedge real estate loans held for sale from the date of close through the sale date.
The fair value of hedged real estate loans held for sale is generally calculated by reference to
quoted prices in secondary markets for commitments to sell real estate loans with similar
characteristics and, accordingly, such loans have been classified as a Level 2 valuation.
- 37 -
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED
12. Fair value measurements, continued
Commitments to originate real estate loans for sale and commitments to sell real estate loans
The Company enters into various commitments to originate real estate loans for sale and commitments
to sell real estate loans. Such commitments are considered to be derivative financial instruments
and, therefore, are carried at estimated fair value on the consolidated balance sheet. The
estimated fair values of such commitments were generally calculated by reference to quoted prices
in secondary markets for commitments to sell real estate loans to certain government-sponsored
entities and other parties. The fair valuations of commitments to sell real estate loans generally
result in a Level 2 classification. The estimated fair value of commitments to originate real
estate loans for sale are adjusted to reflect the Companys anticipated commitment expirations.
Estimated commitment expirations are considered a significant unobservable input, which results in
a Level 3 classification. The Company includes the expected net future cash flows related to the
associated servicing of the loan in the fair value measurement of a derivative loan commitment.
The estimated value ascribed to the expected net future servicing cash flows is also considered a
significant unobservable input contributing to the Level 3 classification of commitments to
originate real estate loans for sale.
Interest rate swap agreements used for interest rate risk management
The Company utilizes interest rate swap agreements as part of the management of interest rate risk
to modify the repricing characteristics of certain portions of its portfolios of earning assets and
interest-bearing liabilities. The Company generally determines the fair value of its interest rate
swap agreements using externally developed pricing models based on market observable inputs and
therefore classifies such valuations as Level 2. The Company has considered counterparty credit
risk in the valuation of its interest rate swap assets and has considered its own credit risk in
the valuation of its interest rate swap liabilities.
The following tables present assets and liabilities at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010
measured at estimated fair value on a recurring basis:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
measurements at |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
Level 1 (a) |
|
|
Level 2 (a) |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Trading account assets |
|
$ |
502,986 |
|
|
|
57,523 |
|
|
|
445,463 |
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities available for
sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury and federal agencies |
|
|
112,953 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
112,953 |
|
|
|
|
|
Obligations of states and
political subdivisions |
|
|
67,491 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
67,491 |
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Government issued or guaranteed |
|
|
3,023,018 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,023,018 |
|
|
|
|
|
Privately issued residential |
|
|
1,306,202 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,306,202 |
|
Privately issued commercial |
|
|
17,233 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,233 |
|
Collateralized debt obligations |
|
|
61,601 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
61,601 |
|
Other debt securities |
|
|
195,536 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
195,536 |
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securities |
|
|
106,455 |
|
|
|
84,676 |
|
|
|
21,779 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,890,489 |
|
|
|
84,676 |
|
|
|
3,420,777 |
|
|
|
1,385,036 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate loans held for sale |
|
|
414,643 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
414,643 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets (b) |
|
|
122,230 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
108,672 |
|
|
|
13,558 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
5,930,348 |
|
|
|
142,199 |
|
|
|
4,389,555 |
|
|
|
1,398,594 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading account liabilities |
|
$ |
366,483 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
366,483 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities (b) |
|
|
7,021 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,634 |
|
|
|
387 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
$ |
373,504 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
373,117 |
|
|
|
387 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- 38 -
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED
12. Fair value measurements, continued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
measurements at |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Level 1 (a) |
|
|
Level 2 (a) |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Trading account assets |
|
$ |
523,834 |
|
|
|
53,032 |
|
|
|
470,802 |
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities available
for sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury and federal agencies |
|
|
63,434 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63,434 |
|
|
|
|
|
Obligations of states and
political subdivisions |
|
|
60,425 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60,425 |
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Government issued or guaranteed |
|
|
3,306,241 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,306,241 |
|
|
|
|
|
Privately issued residential |
|
|
1,435,561 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,435,561 |
|
Privately issued commercial |
|
|
22,407 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,407 |
|
Collateralized debt obligations |
|
|
110,756 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110,756 |
|
Other debt securities |
|
|
298,900 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
298,900 |
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securities |
|
|
115,768 |
|
|
|
106,872 |
|
|
|
8,896 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,413,492 |
|
|
|
106,872 |
|
|
|
3,737,896 |
|
|
|
1,568,724 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate loans held for sale |
|
|
544,567 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
544,567 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets (b) |
|
|
114,666 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
111,839 |
|
|
|
2,827 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
6,596,559 |
|
|
|
159,904 |
|
|
|
4,865,104 |
|
|
|
1,571,551 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading account liabilities |
|
$ |
333,222 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
333,222 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities (b) |
|
|
3,607 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,024 |
|
|
|
583 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
$ |
336,829 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
336,246 |
|
|
|
583 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
There were no significant transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy
during the three months and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010. |
|
(b) |
|
Comprised predominantly of interest rate swap agreements used for interest rate risk
management (Level 2), commitments to sell real estate loans (Level 2) and commitments to
originate real estate loans to be held for sale (Level 3). |
- 39 -
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED
12. Fair value measurements, continued
The changes in Level 3 assets and liabilities measured at estimated fair value on a recurring
basis during the three months ended June 30, 2011 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities available for sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Privately issued |
|
|
Privately issued |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
residential |
|
|
commercial |
|
|
Collateralized |
|
|
Other assets |
|
|
|
mortgage-backed |
|
|
mortgage-backed |
|
|
debt |
|
|
and other |
|
|
|
securities |
|
|
securities |
|
|
obligations |
|
|
liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Balance March 31, 2011 |
|
$ |
1,391,878 |
|
|
$ |
20,467 |
|
|
$ |
114,265 |
|
|
$ |
16,147 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gains (losses)
realized/unrealized: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in earnings |
|
|
(24,530 |
)(a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,800 |
(b) |
Included in other
comprehensive income |
|
|
38,471 |
|
|
|
(1,400 |
) |
|
|
3,372 |
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,790 |
|
|
|
|
|
Sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(105,643 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Settlements |
|
|
(99,617 |
) |
|
|
(1,834 |
) |
|
|
(1,183 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Transfers in and/or out
of Level 3 (c) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(25,776 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance June 30, 2011 |
|
$ |
1,306,202 |
|
|
$ |
17,233 |
|
|
$ |
61,601 |
|
|
$ |
13,171 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in unrealized gains
(losses) included in earnings
related to assets still held
at June 30, 2011 |
|
$ |
(24,530 |
)(a) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
10,252 |
(b) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The changes in Level 3 assets and liabilities measured at estimated fair value on a
recurring basis during the three months ended June 30, 2010 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities available for sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Privately issued |
|
|
Privately issued |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
residential |
|
|
commercial |
|
|
Collateralized |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Other assets |
|
|
|
mortgage-backed |
|
|
mortgage-backed |
|
|
debt |
|
|
debt |
|
|
and other |
|
|
|
securities |
|
|
securities |
|
|
obligations |
|
|
securities |
|
|
liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance March 31,
2010 |
|
$ |
1,664,341 |
|
|
$ |
25,125 |
|
|
$ |
125,755 |
|
|
$ |
455 |
|
|
$ |
8,171 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gains (losses)
realized/unrealized: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in earnings |
|
|
(7,896 |
)(a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,491 |
)(a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,828 |
(b) |
Included in
other comprehensive
income |
|
|
40,794 |
|
|
|
4,021 |
|
|
|
(5,088 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Settlements |
|
|
(99,206 |
) |
|
|
(2,503 |
) |
|
|
(136 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transfers in and/or out
of Level 3 (c) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(455 |
) |
|
|
(17,156 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance June 30, 2010 |
|
$ |
1,598,033 |
|
|
$ |
26,643 |
|
|
$ |
118,040 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
20,843 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in unrealized
gains (losses) included
in earnings related to
assets still held at
June 30, 2010 |
|
$ |
(7,896 |
)(a) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(2,491 |
)(a) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
20,097 |
(b) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- 40 -
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED
12. Fair value measurements, continued
The changes in Level 3 assets and liabilities measured at estimated fair value on a recurring
basis during the six months ended June 30, 2011 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities available for sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Privately issued |
|
|
Privately issued |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
residential |
|
|
commercial |
|
|
Collateralized |
|
|
Other assets |
|
|
|
mortgage-backed |
|
|
mortgage-backed |
|
|
debt |
|
|
and other |
|
|
|
securities |
|
|
securities |
|
|
obligations |
|
|
liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Balance January 1, 2011 |
|
$ |
1,435,561 |
|
|
$ |
22,407 |
|
|
$ |
110,756 |
|
|
$ |
2,244 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gains (losses)
realized/unrealized: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in earnings |
|
|
(32,071 |
)(a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43,244 |
(b) |
Included in other
comprehensive income |
|
|
99,556 |
|
|
|
(1,482 |
) |
|
|
7,206 |
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,790 |
|
|
|
|
|
Sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(105,643 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Settlements |
|
|
(196,844 |
) |
|
|
(3,692 |
) |
|
|
(1,508 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Transfers in and/or out
of Level 3 (c) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(32,317 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance June 30, 2011 |
|
$ |
1,306,202 |
|
|
$ |
17,233 |
|
|
$ |
61,601 |
|
|
$ |
13,171 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in unrealized gains
(losses) included in earnings
related to assets still held at
June 30, 2011 |
|
$ |
(32,071 |
)(a) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
13,139 |
(b) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- 41 -
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED
12. Fair value measurements, continued
The changes in Level 3 assets and liabilities measured at estimated fair value on a recurring
basis during the six months ended June 30, 2010 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities available for sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Privately issued |
|
|
Privately issued |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
residential |
|
|
commercial |
|
|
Collateralized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets |
|
|
|
mortgage-backed |
|
|
mortgage-backed |
|
|
debt |
|
|
Other |
|
|
and other |
|
|
|
securities |
|
|
securities |
|
|
obligations |
|
|
debt securities |
|
|
liabilities |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Balance January 1, 2010 |
|
$ |
2,064,904 |
|
|
$ |
25,166 |
|
|
$ |
115,346 |
|
|
$ |
420 |
|
|
$ |
(80 |
) |
|
Total gains (losses)
realized/unrealized: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in earnings |
|
|
(34,343 |
)(a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,846 |
)(a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
47,850 |
(b) |
Included in other
comprehensive income |
|
|
115,248 |
|
|
|
6,094 |
|
|
|
5,807 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
Settlements |
|
|
(192,528 |
) |
|
|
(4,617 |
) |
|
|
(267 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transfers in and/or out
of Level 3 (c) |
|
|
(355,248 |
)(d) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(455 |
) |
|
|
(26,927 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance June 30, 2010 |
|
$ |
1,598,033 |
|
|
$ |
26,643 |
|
|
$ |
118,040 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
20,843 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in unrealized
gains (losses) included
in earnings related to
assets still held at
June 30, 2010 |
|
$ |
(34,343 |
)(a) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(2,846 |
)(a) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
20,598 |
(b) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Reported as an other-than-temporary impairment loss in the consolidated statement of
income or as gain (loss) on bank investment securities. |
|
(b) |
|
Reported as mortgage banking revenues in the consolidated statement of income and includes
the fair value of commitment issuances and expirations. |
|
(c) |
|
The Companys policy for transfers between fair value levels is to recognize the transfer as
of the actual date of the event or change in circumstances that caused the transfer. |
|
(d) |
|
As a result of the Companys adoption of new accounting rules governing the consolidation of
variable interest entities, effective January 1, 2010 the Company derecognized $355 million of
available-for-sale investment securities previously classified as Level 3 measurements. |
- 42 -
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED
12. Fair value measurements, continued
The Company is required, on a nonrecurring basis, to adjust the carrying value of certain
assets or provide valuation allowances related to certain assets using fair value measurements.
The more significant of those assets follow.
Loans
Loans are generally not recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. Periodically, the Company
records nonrecurring adjustments to the carrying value of loans based on fair value measurements
for partial charge-offs of the uncollectible portions of those loans. Nonrecurring adjustments also
include certain impairment amounts for collateral-dependent loans when establishing the allowance
for credit losses. Such amounts are generally based on the fair value of the underlying collateral
supporting the loan and, as a result, the carrying value of the loan less the calculated valuation
amount does not necessarily represent the fair value of the loan. Real estate collateral is
typically valued using appraisals or other indications of value based on recent comparable sales of
similar properties or assumptions generally observable in the marketplace and the related
nonrecurring fair value measurement adjustments have generally been classified as Level 2, unless
significant adjustments have been made to the valuation that are not readily observable by market
participants. Estimates of fair value used for other collateral supporting commercial loans
generally are based on assumptions not observable in the marketplace and therefore such valuations
have been classified as Level 3. Loans subject to nonrecurring fair value measurement were $478
million at June 30, 2011 ($324 million and $154 million of which were classified as Level 2 and
Level 3, respectively) and $664 million at June 30, 2010 ($378 million and $286 million of which
were classified as Level 2 and Level 3, respectively). Changes in fair value recognized for
partial charge-offs of loans and loan impairment reserves on loans held by the Company on June 30,
2011 were decreases of $61 million and $91 million for the three- and six-month periods ended June
30, 2011, respectively. Changes in fair value recognized for partial charge-offs of loans and loan
impairment reserves on loans held by the Company on June 30, 2010 were decreases of $64 million and
$125 million for the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2010, respectively.
Assets taken in foreclosure of defaulted loans
Assets taken in foreclosure of defaulted loans are primarily comprised of commercial and
residential real property and are generally measured at the lower of cost or fair value less costs
to sell. The fair value of the real property is generally determined using appraisals or other
indications of value based on recent comparable sales of similar properties or assumptions
generally observable in the marketplace, and the related nonrecurring fair value measurement
adjustments have generally been classified as Level 2. Assets taken in foreclosure of defaulted
loans subject to nonrecurring fair value measurement were $50 million and $127 million at June 30,
2011 and June 30, 2010, respectively. Reflecting further declines in residential real estate and
residential development projects subsequent to foreclosure, changes in fair value recognized for
those foreclosed assets held by the Company at June 30, 2011 were $13 million and $15 million
for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2011, respectively. Changes in fair value
recognized for those foreclosed assets held by the Company at June 30, 2010 were $16
million and $21 million for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2010, respectively.
- 43 -
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED
12. Fair value measurements, continued
Disclosures of fair value of financial instruments
With the exception of marketable securities, certain off-balance sheet financial instruments and
one-to-four family residential mortgage loans originated for sale, the Companys financial
instruments are not readily marketable and market prices do not exist. The Company, in attempting
to comply with the provisions of GAAP that require disclosures of fair value of financial
instruments, has not attempted to market its financial instruments to potential buyers, if any
exist. Since negotiated prices in illiquid markets depend greatly upon the then present motivations
of the buyer and seller, it is reasonable to assume that actual sales prices could vary widely from
any estimate of fair value made without the benefit of negotiations. Additionally, changes in
market interest rates can dramatically impact the value of financial instruments in a short period
of time. Additional information about the assumptions and calculations utilized follows.
The carrying amounts and estimated fair value for financial instrument assets (liabilities)
are presented in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Calculated |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Calculated |
|
|
|
amount |
|
|
estimate |
|
|
amount |
|
|
estimate |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Financial assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
1,332,915 |
|
|
$ |
1,332,915 |
|
|
$ |
933,755 |
|
|
$ |
933,755 |
|
Interest-bearing deposits at banks |
|
|
2,275,450 |
|
|
|
2,275,450 |
|
|
|
101,222 |
|
|
|
101,222 |
|
Trading account assets |
|
|
502,986 |
|
|
|
502,986 |
|
|
|
523,834 |
|
|
|
523,834 |
|
Agreements to resell securities |
|
|
380,000 |
|
|
|
380,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities |
|
|
6,492,265 |
|
|
|
6,416,075 |
|
|
|
7,150,540 |
|
|
|
7,051,454 |
|
Loans and leases: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial loans and leases |
|
|
15,040,892 |
|
|
|
14,827,062 |
|
|
|
13,390,610 |
|
|
|
13,135,569 |
|
Commercial real estate loans |
|
|
24,263,726 |
|
|
|
23,979,139 |
|
|
|
21,183,161 |
|
|
|
20,840,346 |
|
Residential real estate loans |
|
|
6,970,921 |
|
|
|
6,809,347 |
|
|
|
5,928,056 |
|
|
|
5,699,028 |
|
Consumer loans |
|
|
12,265,690 |
|
|
|
11,962,056 |
|
|
|
11,488,555 |
|
|
|
11,178,583 |
|
Allowance for credit losses |
|
|
(907,589 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(902,941 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans and leases, net |
|
|
57,633,640 |
|
|
|
57,577,604 |
|
|
|
51,087,441 |
|
|
|
50,853,526 |
|
Accrued interest receivable |
|
|
212,357 |
|
|
|
212,357 |
|
|
|
202,182 |
|
|
|
202,182 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest-bearing deposits |
|
$ |
(18,598,828 |
) |
|
$ |
(18,598,828 |
) |
|
$ |
(14,557,568 |
) |
|
$ |
(14,557,568 |
) |
Savings deposits and NOW accounts |
|
|
(32,400,035 |
) |
|
|
(32,400,035 |
) |
|
|
(27,824,630 |
) |
|
|
(27,824,630 |
) |
Time deposits |
|
|
(7,678,799 |
) |
|
|
(7,713,421 |
) |
|
|
(5,817,170 |
) |
|
|
(5,865,779 |
) |
Deposits at Cayman Islands office |
|
|
(551,553 |
) |
|
|
(551,553 |
) |
|
|
(1,605,916 |
) |
|
|
(1,605,916 |
) |
Short-term borrowings |
|
|
(567,144 |
) |
|
|
(567,144 |
) |
|
|
(947,432 |
) |
|
|
(947,432 |
) |
Long-term borrowings |
|
|
(7,128,916 |
) |
|
|
(7,280,296 |
) |
|
|
(7,840,151 |
) |
|
|
(7,937,397 |
) |
Accrued interest payable |
|
|
(89,182 |
) |
|
|
(89,182 |
) |
|
|
(71,954 |
) |
|
|
(71,954 |
) |
Trading account liabilities |
|
|
(366,483 |
) |
|
|
(366,483 |
) |
|
|
(333,222 |
) |
|
|
(333,222 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other financial instruments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments to originate real
estate loans for sale |
|
$ |
13,171 |
|
|
$ |
13,171 |
|
|
$ |
2,244 |
|
|
$ |
2,244 |
|
Commitments to sell real estate loans |
|
|
(4,139 |
) |
|
|
(4,139 |
) |
|
|
12,178 |
|
|
|
12,178 |
|
Other credit-related commitments |
|
|
(99,959 |
) |
|
|
(99,959 |
) |
|
|
(74,426 |
) |
|
|
(74,426 |
) |
Interest rate swap agreements used
for interest rate risk management |
|
|
106,177 |
|
|
|
106,177 |
|
|
|
96,637 |
|
|
|
96,637 |
|
- 44 -
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED
12. Fair value measurements, continued
The following assumptions, methods and calculations were used in determining the estimated
fair value of financial instruments.
Cash
and cash equivalents, interest-bearing deposits at banks, agreements to resell securities, short-term borrowings, accrued interest receivable and accrued interest payable
Due to the nature of cash and cash equivalents and the near maturity of interest-bearing deposits
at banks, agreements to resell securities, short-term borrowings, accrued interest receivable and
accrued interest payable, the Company estimated that the carrying amount of such instruments
approximated estimated fair value.
Investment securities
Estimated fair values of investments in readily marketable securities were generally based on
quoted market prices. Investment securities that were not readily marketable were assigned amounts
based on estimates provided by outside parties or modeling techniques that relied upon discounted
calculations of projected cash flows or, in the case of other investment securities, which include
capital stock of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York and the Federal Home Loan Bank of New York,
at an amount equal to the carrying amount.
Loans and leases
In general, discount rates used to calculate values for loan products were based on the Companys
pricing at the respective period end. A higher discount rate was assumed with respect to estimated
cash flows associated with nonaccrual loans. Projected loan cash flows were adjusted for estimated
credit losses. However, such estimates made by the Company may not be indicative of assumptions and
adjustments that a purchaser of the Companys loans and leases would seek.
Deposits
Pursuant to GAAP, the estimated fair value ascribed to noninterest-bearing deposits, savings
deposits and NOW accounts must be established at carrying value because of the customers ability
to withdraw funds immediately. Time deposit accounts are required to be revalued based upon
prevailing market interest rates for similar maturity instruments. As a result, amounts assigned to
time deposits were based on discounted cash flow calculations using prevailing market interest
rates based on the Companys pricing at the respective date for deposits with comparable remaining
terms to maturity.
The Company believes that deposit accounts have a value greater than that prescribed by GAAP.
The Company feels, however, that the value associated with these deposits is greatly influenced by
characteristics of the buyer, such as the ability to reduce the costs of servicing the deposits and
deposit attrition which often occurs following an acquisition.
Long-term borrowings
The amounts assigned to long-term borrowings were based on quoted market prices, when available, or
were based on discounted cash flow calculations using prevailing market interest rates for
borrowings of similar terms and credit risk.
Commitments to originate real estate loans for sale and commitments to sell real estate loans
The Company enters into various commitments to originate real estate loans for sale and commitments
to sell real estate loans. Such commitments are considered to be derivative financial instruments
and, therefore, are carried at estimated fair value on the consolidated balance sheet. The
estimated fair values of such commitments were generally calculated by reference to quoted market
prices for commitments to sell real estate loans to certain government-sponsored entities and other
parties.
- 45 -
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED
12. Fair value measurements, continued
Interest rate swap agreements used for interest rate risk management
The estimated fair value of interest rate swap agreements used for interest rate risk management
represents the amount the Company would have expected to receive or pay to terminate such
agreements.
Other commitments and contingencies
As described in note 13, in the normal course of business, various commitments and contingent
liabilities are outstanding, such as loan commitments, credit guarantees and letters of credit. The
Companys pricing of such financial instruments is based largely on credit quality and
relationship, probability of funding and other requirements. Loan commitments often have fixed
expiration dates and contain termination and other clauses which provide for relief from funding in
the event of significant deterioration in the credit quality of the customer. The rates and terms
of the Companys loan commitments, credit guarantees and letters of credit are competitive with
other financial institutions operating in markets served by the Company. The Company believes that
the carrying amounts, which are included in other liabilities, are reasonable estimates of the fair
value of these financial instruments.
The Company does not believe that the estimated information presented herein is representative
of the earnings power or value of the Company. The preceding analysis, which is inherently limited
in depicting fair value, also does not consider any value associated with existing customer
relationships nor the ability of the Company to create value through loan origination, deposit
gathering or fee generating activities.
Many of the estimates presented herein are based upon the use of highly subjective information
and assumptions and, accordingly, the results may not be precise. Management believes that fair
value estimates may not be comparable between financial institutions due to the wide range of
permitted valuation techniques and numerous estimates which must be made. Furthermore, because the
disclosed fair value amounts were estimated as of the balance sheet date, the amounts actually
realized or paid upon maturity or settlement of the various financial instruments could be
significantly different.
- 46 -
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED
13. Commitments and contingencies
In the normal course of business, various commitments and contingent liabilities are outstanding.
The following table presents the Companys significant commitments. Certain of these commitments
are not included in the Companys consolidated balance sheet.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Commitments to extend credit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home equity lines of credit |
|
$ |
6,534,722 |
|
|
|
6,281,366 |
|
Commercial real estate loans
to be sold |
|
|
181,180 |
|
|
|
72,930 |
|
Other commercial real estate
and construction |
|
|
2,746,493 |
|
|
|
1,672,006 |
|
Residential real estate loans
to be sold |
|
|
482,774 |
|
|
|
161,583 |
|
Other residential real estate |
|
|
113,738 |
|
|
|
151,111 |
|
Commercial and other |
|
|
10,787,826 |
|
|
|
8,332,199 |
|
Standby letters of credit |
|
|
3,963,575 |
|
|
|
3,917,318 |
|
Commercial letters of credit |
|
|
65,766 |
|
|
|
76,962 |
|
Financial guarantees and
indemnification contracts |
|
|
1,790,502 |
|
|
|
1,609,944 |
|
Commitments to sell
real estate loans |
|
|
903,582 |
|
|
|
734,696 |
|
Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to customers, generally having fixed
expiration dates or other termination clauses that may require payment of a fee. Standby and
commercial letters of credit are conditional commitments issued to guarantee the performance of a
customer to a third party. Standby letters of credit generally are contingent upon the failure of
the customer to perform according to the terms of the underlying contract with the third party,
whereas commercial letters of credit are issued to facilitate commerce and typically result in the
commitment being funded when the underlying transaction is consummated between the customer and a
third party. The credit risk associated with commitments to extend credit and standby and
commercial letters of credit is essentially the same as that involved with extending loans to
customers and is subject to normal credit policies. Collateral may be obtained based on
managements assessment of the customers creditworthiness.
Financial guarantees and indemnification contracts are oftentimes similar to standby letters
of credit and include mandatory purchase agreements issued to ensure that customer obligations are
fulfilled, recourse obligations associated with sold loans, and other guarantees of customer
performance or compliance with designated rules and regulations. Included in financial guarantees
and indemnification contracts are loan principal amounts sold with recourse in conjunction with the
Companys involvement in the Fannie Mae Delegated Underwriting and Servicing program. The
Companys maximum credit risk for recourse associated with loans sold under this program totaled
approximately $1.7 billion and $1.6 billion at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively.
Since many loan commitments, standby letters of credit, and guarantees and indemnification
contracts expire without being funded in whole or in part, the contract amounts are not necessarily
indicative of future cash flows.
- 47 -
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED
13. Commitments and contingencies, continued
The Company utilizes commitments to sell real estate loans to hedge exposure to changes in the
fair value of real estate loans held for sale. Such commitments are considered derivatives and
along with commitments to originate real estate loans to be held for sale are generally recorded in
the consolidated balance sheet at estimated fair market value.
The Company has an agreement with the Baltimore Ravens of the National Football League whereby
the Company obtained the naming rights to a football stadium in Baltimore, Maryland. Under the
agreement, the Company is obligated to pay $5 million per year through 2013 and $6 million per year
from 2014 through 2017.
The Company also has commitments under long-term operating leases.
The Company reinsures credit life and accident and health insurance purchased by consumer loan
customers. The Company also enters into reinsurance contracts with third party insurance companies
who insure against the risk of a mortgage borrowers payment default in connection with certain
mortgage loans originated by the Company. When providing reinsurance coverage, the Company
receives a premium in exchange for accepting a portion of the insurers risk of loss. The
outstanding loan principal balances reinsured by the Company were approximately $78 million at June
30, 2011. Assets of subsidiaries providing reinsurance that are available to satisfy claims
totaled approximately $51 million at June 30, 2011. The amounts noted above are not necessarily
indicative of losses which may ultimately be incurred. Such losses are expected to be
substantially less because most loans are repaid by borrowers in accordance with the original loan
terms. Management believes any reinsurance losses that may be payable by the Company will not be
material to the Companys consolidated financial position.
The Company is contractually obligated to repurchase previously sold residential real estate
loans that do not ultimately meet investor sale criteria related to underwriting procedures or loan
documentation. When required to do so, the Company may reimburse loan purchasers for losses
incurred or may repurchase certain loans. The Company reduces residential mortgage banking
revenues by an estimate for losses related to its obligations to loan purchasers. The amount of
those charges is based on the volume of loans sold, the level of reimbursement requests received
from loan purchasers and estimates of losses that may be associated with previously sold loans. At
June 30, 2011, management believes that any remaining liability arising out of the Companys
obligation to loan purchasers is not material to the Companys consolidated financial position.
M&T and its
subsidiaries are subject in the normal course of business to various pending and
threatened legal proceedings in which claims for monetary damages are asserted. Management, after
consultation with legal counsel, does not anticipate that the aggregate ultimate liability arising
out of litigation pending or threatened against M&T or its subsidiaries will be material to the
Companys consolidated financial position. On an on-going basis the Company assesses its
liabilities and contingencies in connection with such legal proceedings. For those matters where
it is probable that the Company will incur losses and the amounts of the losses can be reasonably
estimated, the Company records an expense and corresponding liability in its consolidated financial
statements. To the extent the pending or threatened litigation could result in exposure in excess
of that liability, the amount of such excess is not currently estimable. Although not considered probable, the range of
reasonably possible losses for such matters in the aggregate, beyond the existing recorded
liability, was between $0 and $40 million. Although the Company does not believe that the outcome of pending litigations will
be material to the Companys consolidated financial position, it cannot rule out the possibility that such outcomes will
be material to the consolidated results of operations for a particular reporting period in the future.
- 48 -
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED
14. Segment information
Reportable segments have been determined based upon the Companys internal profitability reporting
system, which is organized by strategic business unit. Certain strategic business units have been
combined for segment information reporting purposes where the nature of the products and services,
the type of customer and the distribution of those products and services are similar. The
reportable segments are Business Banking, Commercial Banking, Commercial Real Estate, Discretionary
Portfolio, Residential Mortgage Banking and Retail Banking.
The financial information of the Companys segments was compiled utilizing the accounting
policies described in note 22 to the Companys consolidated financial statements as of and for the
year ended December 31, 2010. The management accounting policies and processes utilized in
compiling segment financial information are highly subjective and, unlike financial accounting, are
not based on authoritative guidance similar to GAAP. As a result, the financial information of the
reported segments is not necessarily comparable with similar information reported by other
financial institutions. As also described in note 22 to the Companys 2010 consolidated financial
statements, neither goodwill nor core deposit and other intangible assets (and the amortization
charges associated with such assets) resulting from acquisitions of financial institutions have
been allocated to the Companys reportable segments, but are included in the All Other category.
The Company does, however, assign such intangible assets to business units for purposes of testing
for impairment.
Information about the Companys segments is presented in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended June 30 |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
Inter- segment |
|
|
Net |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Inter- segment |
|
|
Net |
|
|
|
revenues(a) |
|
|
revenues |
|
|
income (loss) |
|
|
revenues(a) |
|
|
revenues |
|
|
income (loss) |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Business Banking |
|
$ |
104,012 |
|
|
|
971 |
|
|
|
26,584 |
|
|
|
102,610 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,552 |
|
Commercial Banking |
|
|
228,564 |
|
|
|
1,190 |
|
|
|
95,111 |
|
|
|
194,575 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
81,612 |
|
Commercial
Real Estate |
|
|
134,066 |
|
|
|
448 |
|
|
|
65,058 |
|
|
|
109,487 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
43,667 |
|
Discretionary
Portfolio |
|
|
112,383 |
|
|
|
(4,419 |
) |
|
|
58,362 |
|
|
|
5,580 |
|
|
|
(2,500 |
) |
|
|
(4,073 |
) |
Residential
Mortgage Banking |
|
|
58,305 |
|
|
|
8,699 |
|
|
|
5,966 |
|
|
|
65,766 |
|
|
|
8,876 |
|
|
|
(467 |
) |
Retail Banking |
|
|
311,484 |
|
|
|
2,967 |
|
|
|
54,645 |
|
|
|
315,638 |
|
|
|
2,690 |
|
|
|
67,080 |
|
All Other |
|
|
139,044 |
|
|
|
(9,856 |
) |
|
|
16,632 |
|
|
|
47,128 |
|
|
|
(9,105 |
) |
|
|
(25,622 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,087,858 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
322,358 |
|
|
|
840,784 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
188,749 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- 49 -
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED
14. Segment information, continued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30 |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
Inter- segment |
|
|
Net |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Inter- segment |
|
|
Net |
|
|
|
revenues |
(a) |
|
revenues |
|
|
income (loss) |
|
|
revenues |
(a) |
|
revenues |
|
|
income (loss) |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Business Banking |
|
$ |
203,789 |
|
|
|
1,933 |
|
|
|
52,884 |
|
|
|
204,406 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51,896 |
|
Commercial Banking |
|
|
442,176 |
|
|
|
2,356 |
|
|
|
183,442 |
|
|
|
386,981 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
158,480 |
|
Commercial
Real Estate |
|
|
259,372 |
|
|
|
804 |
|
|
|
114,068 |
|
|
|
219,900 |
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
87,420 |
|
Discretionary
Portfolio |
|
|
154,866 |
|
|
|
(12,206 |
) |
|
|
74,489 |
|
|
|
(6,653 |
) |
|
|
(5,247 |
) |
|
|
(20,235 |
) |
Residential
Mortgage Banking |
|
|
116,153 |
|
|
|
19,006 |
|
|
|
10,751 |
|
|
|
128,883 |
|
|
|
17,073 |
|
|
|
128 |
|
Retail Banking |
|
|
606,532 |
|
|
|
5,954 |
|
|
|
107,371 |
|
|
|
623,113 |
|
|
|
5,377 |
|
|
|
126,117 |
|
All Other |
|
|
188,194 |
|
|
|
(17,847 |
) |
|
|
(14,374 |
) |
|
|
98,194 |
|
|
|
(17,260 |
) |
|
|
(64,102 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,971,082 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
528,631 |
|
|
|
1,654,824 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
339,704 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average total assets |
|
|
|
Six months ended |
|
|
Year ended |
|
|
|
June 30 |
|
|
December 31 |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
Business Banking |
|
$ |
4,861 |
|
|
|
4,884 |
|
|
|
4,843 |
|
Commercial Banking |
|
|
16,856 |
|
|
|
15,504 |
|
|
|
15,461 |
|
Commercial Real Estate |
|
|
14,227 |
|
|
|
13,255 |
|
|
|
13,194 |
|
Discretionary Portfolio |
|
|
14,012 |
|
|
|
14,699 |
|
|
|
14,690 |
|
Residential Mortgage Banking |
|
|
1,940 |
|
|
|
2,188 |
|
|
|
2,217 |
|
Retail Banking |
|
|
11,776 |
|
|
|
12,191 |
|
|
|
12,079 |
|
All Other |
|
|
6,590 |
|
|
|
5,886 |
|
|
|
5,896 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
70,262 |
|
|
|
68,607 |
|
|
|
68,380 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Total revenues are comprised of net interest income and other income. Net interest income is
the difference between taxable-equivalent interest earned on assets and interest paid on
liabilities by a segment and a funding charge (credit) based on the Companys internal funds
transfer and allocation methodology. Segments are charged a cost to fund any assets (e.g.
loans) and are paid a funding credit for any funds provided (e.g. deposits). The
taxable-equivalent adjustment aggregated $6,468,000 and |
- 50 -
NOTES TO
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED
14. Segment information, continued
$6,105,000 for the three-month periods ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, and
$12,795,000 and $12,028,000 for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2011 and 2010,
respectively, and is eliminated in All Other total revenues. Intersegment revenues are
included in total revenues of the reportable segments. The elimination of intersegment
revenues is included in the determination of All Other total revenues.
15. Relationship with Bayview Lending Group LLC and Bayview Financial Holdings, L.P.
M&T holds a 20% interest in Bayview Lending Group LLC (BLG), a privately-held commercial mortgage
lender. M&T recognizes income or loss from BLG using the equity method of accounting. The
carrying value of that investment was $206 million at June 30, 2011.
Bayview Financial Holdings, L.P. (together with its affiliates, Bayview Financial), a
privately-held specialty mortgage finance company, is BLGs majority investor. In addition to
their common investment in BLG, the Company and Bayview Financial conduct other business activities
with each other. The Company has obtained loan servicing rights for small-balance commercial
mortgage loans from BLG and Bayview Financial having outstanding principal balances of $4.8 billion
and $5.2 billion at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively. Amounts recorded as
capitalized servicing assets for such loans totaled $21 million at June 30, 2011 and $26 million at
December 31, 2010. In addition, capitalized servicing rights at June 30, 2011 and December 31,
2010 also included $7 million and $9 million, respectively, for servicing rights that were obtained
from Bayview Financial related to residential mortgage loans with outstanding principal balances of
$3.4 billion at June 30, 2011 and $3.6 billion at December 31, 2010. Revenues from servicing
residential and small-balance commercial mortgage loans obtained from BLG and Bayview Financial
were $10 million and $12 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively,
and $21 million and $24 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. In
addition, at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the Company held $17 million and $22 million,
respectively, of collateralized mortgage obligations in its available-for-sale investment
securities portfolio that were securitized by Bayview Financial. Finally, the Company held $292
million and $313 million of similar investment securities in its held-to-maturity portfolio at June
30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively.
- 51 -
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations. |
Overview
Net income for M&T Bank Corporation (M&T) in the second quarter of 2011 was $322 million or $2.42
of diluted earnings per common share, compared with $189 million or $1.46 of diluted earnings per
common share in the year-earlier quarter. During the first quarter of 2011, net income totaled
$206 million or $1.59 of diluted earnings per common share. Basic earnings per common share were
$2.43 in the recent quarter, compared with $1.47 in the second quarter of 2010 and $1.59 in the
initial 2011 quarter. The after-tax impact of net acquisition and integration-related gains and
expenses (included herein as merger-related expenses) resulted in income of $42 million ($28
million pre-tax) or $.33 of basic and diluted earnings per common share in the second quarter of
2011, compared with expenses of $3 million ($4 million pre-tax) or $.02 of basic and diluted
earnings per common share in the first quarter of 2011. Such gains and expenses were associated
with M&Ts May 16, 2011 acquisition of Wilmington Trust Corporation (Wilmington Trust),
headquartered in Wilmington, Delaware, and the November 5, 2010 purchase and assumption agreement
between M&T Bank, M&Ts principal banking subsidiary, and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
(FDIC) to assume all of the deposits (except certain brokered deposits) and acquire certain
assets of K Bank, based in Randallstown, Maryland, in an assisted transaction with the FDIC. There
were no merger-related expenses in the first or second quarters of 2010. For the first half of
2011, net income totaled $529 million or $4.02 of diluted earnings per common share, compared with
$340 million or $2.61 of diluted earnings per common share in the corresponding 2010 period. Basic
earnings per common share for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 were $4.04 and
$2.63, respectively. The after-tax impact of merger-related gains and expenses associated with
Wilmington Trust and K Bank was income of $39 million ($24 million pre-tax) or $.32 of basic and
diluted earnings per common share during the six-month period ended June 30, 2011.
The annualized rate of return on average total assets for M&T and its consolidated
subsidiaries (the Company) in the recent quarter was 1.78%, compared with 1.11% in the second
quarter of 2010 and 1.23% in the first quarter of 2011. The annualized rate of return on average
common shareholders equity was 14.94% in the second quarter of 2011, compared with 9.67% in the
year-earlier quarter and 10.16% in the first three months of 2011. During the six-month period
ended June 30, 2011, the annualized rates of return on average assets and average common
shareholders equity were 1.52% and 12.62%, respectively, compared with 1.00% and 8.78%,
respectively, in the first six months of 2010.
On May 16, 2011, M&T acquired all of the outstanding common stock of Wilmington Trust in a
stock-for-stock transaction. Wilmington Trust operated 55 banking offices in Delaware and
Pennsylvania at the date of acquisition. The results of operations acquired in the Wilmington
Trust transaction have been included in the Companys financial results since the acquisition date.
Wilmington Trust shareholders received .051372 shares of M&T common stock in exchange for each
share of Wilmington Trust common stock, resulting in M&T issuing a total of 4,694,486 common shares
with an acquisition date fair value of $406 million.
The Wilmington Trust transaction has been accounted for using the acquisition method of
accounting and, accordingly, assets acquired, liabilities assumed and consideration exchanged were
recorded at estimated fair value on the acquisition date. Assets acquired totaled $10.8 billion,
including $6.4 billion of loans and leases (including approximately $3.2 billion of commercial real
estate loans, $1.4 billion of commercial loans and leases, $1.1 billion of consumer loans and $680
million of residential real estate loans). Liabilities assumed aggregated $10.0 billion, including
$8.9
- 52 -
billion of deposits. The transaction added $406 million to M&Ts common shareholders equity.
Immediately prior to the closing of the Wilmington Trust transaction, M&T purchased the $330
million of preferred stock issued by Wilmington Trust as part of the Troubled Asset Relief Program
Capital Purchase Program of the U.S. Department of Treasury (U.S. Treasury). In connection
with the acquisition, the Company recorded $176 million of core deposit and other intangible
assets. The core deposit and other intangible assets are being amortized over periods of 5 to 7
years using an accelerated method. There was no goodwill recorded as a result of the transaction;
however, a non-taxable gain of $65 million was realized, which represented the excess of the fair
value of assets acquired less liabilities assumed over consideration exchanged. The acquisition of
Wilmington Trust forms one of the largest banks in the Eastern United States, adding to M&Ts
market-leading position in the Mid-Atlantic region, including the leading deposit market share in
Delaware.
Pursuant to its capital plan, M&T undertook the following actions during the recent quarter:
|
|
|
Redeemed $370 million of its Series A Preferred Stock issued pursuant
to the Troubled Asset Relief Program Capital Purchase Program of the U.S.
Treasury; and |
|
|
|
|
Issued $500 million of perpetual 6.875% non-cumulative preferred stock
in order to supplement Tier 1 Capital. |
As part of the K Bank transaction, M&T Bank entered into a loss-share arrangement with the
FDIC whereby M&T Bank will be reimbursed by the FDIC for most losses it incurs on the acquired loan
portfolio. The transaction was accounted for using the acquisition method of accounting and,
accordingly, assets acquired and liabilities assumed were recorded at estimated fair value on the
acquisition date. Assets acquired in the transaction totaled approximately $556 million, including
$154 million of loans and $186 million in cash, and liabilities assumed aggregated $528 million,
including $491 million of deposits. In accordance with generally accepted accounting principles
(GAAP), M&T Bank recorded an after-tax gain on the transaction of $17 million ($28 million before
taxes). The gain reflects the amount of financial support and indemnification against loan losses
that M&T Bank obtained from the FDIC. There was no goodwill or other intangible assets recorded in
connection with this transaction. The operations obtained in the K Bank acquisition transaction did
not have a material impact on the Companys consolidated financial position or results of
operations.
The condition of the domestic and global economy over the last several years has significantly
impacted the financial services industry as a whole, and specifically, the financial results of the
Company. In particular, high unemployment levels and significantly depressed residential real
estate valuations have led to increased loan charge-offs experienced by financial institutions
throughout that time period. Since the official end of the recession in the United States sometime
in the latter half of 2009, the recovery of the economy has been very slow. The Company has
experienced charge-offs at higher than historical levels since 2008, including in the first half of
2011. In addition, many financial institutions have continued to experience unrealized losses
related to investment securities backed by residential and commercial real estate due to a lack of
liquidity in the financial markets and anticipated credit losses. Many financial institutions,
including the Company, have taken charges for those unrealized losses that were deemed to be other
than temporary.
Reflected in the Companys results for the three months ended June 30, 2011 were gains from
the sale of investment securities available for sale, predominantly residential mortgage-backed
securities guaranteed by the Federal National Mortgage Association (Fannie Mae) and the Federal
Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (Freddie Mac), collateralized debt obligations
- 53 -
(CDOs) and
capital preferred securities. Such gains increased net income in the recent quarter by $67 million
($111 million before taxes), or $.54 of diluted earnings per common share. The Company sold the
securities in response to the Wilmington Trust acquisition in order to manage its balance sheet
size and composition and resultant capital ratios. The recent quarters results were also impacted
by $16 million of after-tax other-than-temporary impairment charges ($27 million before taxes) on
certain privately issued collateralized mortgage obligations (CMOs), reducing diluted earnings
per common share by $.13.
Reflected in the Companys second quarter 2010 results were $14 million of after-tax
other-than-temporary impairment charges ($22 million before taxes) on certain available-for-sale
investment securities, reducing diluted earnings per common share by $.11. Specifically, $12
million (pre-tax) of such charges related to American Depositary Shares (ADSs) of Allied Irish
Banks, p.l.c. (AIB) obtained in M&Ts 2003 acquisition of a subsidiary of AIB and $10 million
(pre-tax) related to certain privately issued CMOs backed by residential real estate loans and CDOs
backed by pooled trust preferred securities.
Reflected in the Companys first quarter 2011 results were gains from the sale of investment
securities, predominantly residential mortgage-backed securities guaranteed by Fannie Mae and
Freddie Mac. Such gains increased net income in that quarter by $24 million ($39 million before
taxes), or $.20 of diluted earnings per common share. In response to strong growth in average loans
in that quarter and in anticipation of the acquisition of Wilmington Trust, the Company sold the
securities in order to manage its forecasted balance sheet size and resultant capital ratios. Also
impacting first quarter 2011 results were $10 million of after-tax other-than-temporary impairment
charges ($16 million before taxes) on certain investment securities, reducing diluted earnings per
common share by $.08. Specifically, such charges related to certain privately issued CMOs.
Recent Legislative Developments
The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (Dodd-Frank Act) was signed into
law on July 21, 2010. This new law has and will continue to significantly change the current bank
regulatory structure and affect the lending, deposit, investment, trading and operating activities
of financial institutions and their holding companies, and will fundamentally change the system of
regulatory oversight of the Company, including through the creation of the Financial Stability
Oversight Council. The Dodd-Frank Act requires various federal agencies to adopt a broad range of
new implementing rules and regulations, and to prepare numerous studies and reports for Congress.
The Dodd-Frank Act could have a material adverse impact on the financial services industry as a
whole, as well as on M&Ts business, results of operations, financial condition and liquidity.
The Dodd-Frank Act broadens the base for FDIC insurance assessments. Beginning in the second
quarter of 2011, assessments are based on average consolidated total assets less tangible equity
capital of a financial institution. The Dodd-Frank Act also permanently increases the maximum
amount of deposit insurance for banks, savings institutions and credit unions to $250,000 per
depositor, retroactive to January 1, 2009, and noninterest-bearing transaction accounts have
unlimited deposit insurance through December 31, 2013.
The legislation also requires that publicly traded companies give shareholders a non-binding
vote on executive compensation and golden parachute payments, and authorizes the Securities and
Exchange Commission to promulgate rules that would allow shareholders to nominate their own
candidates using a companys proxy materials. The Dodd-Frank Act also directs the Federal Reserve Board to promulgate
rules prohibiting excessive
- 54 -
compensation paid to bank holding company
executives, regardless of whether the company is publicly traded.
The Dodd-Frank Act established a new Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection with broad powers
to supervise and enforce consumer protection laws. The Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection has
broad rule-making authority for a wide range of consumer protection laws that apply to all banks
and savings institutions, including the authority to prohibit unfair, deceptive or abusive acts
and practices. The Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection has examination and enforcement
authority over all banks and savings institutions with more than $10 billion in assets.
In addition, the Dodd-Frank Act, among other things:
|
|
|
Weakens the federal preemption rules that have been applicable
for national banks and gives state attorneys general the ability to enforce
federal consumer protection laws; |
|
|
|
|
Amends the Electronic Fund Transfer Act (EFTA) which has
resulted in, among other things, the Federal Reserve Board issuing rules aimed
at limiting debit card-interchange fees; |
|
|
|
|
Applies the same leverage and risk-based capital requirements
that apply to insured depository institutions to most bank holding companies
which, among other things, will, after a three-year phase-in period which begins
January 1, 2013, remove trust preferred securities as a permitted component of a
holding companys Tier 1 capital; |
|
|
|
|
Provides for an increase in the FDIC assessment for depository
institutions with assets of $10 billion or more and increases the minimum
reserve ratio for the deposit insurance fund from 1.15% to 1.35%; |
|
|
|
|
Imposes comprehensive regulation of the over-the-counter
derivatives market, which would include certain provisions that would
effectively prohibit insured depository institutions from conducting certain
derivatives businesses in the institution itself; |
|
|
|
|
Repeals the federal prohibitions on the payment of interest on
demand deposits, thereby permitting depository institutions to pay interest on
business transaction and other accounts; |
|
|
|
|
Provides mortgage reform provisions regarding a customers
ability to repay, restricting variable-rate lending by requiring the ability to
repay to be determined for variable-rate loans by using the maximum rate that
will apply during the first five years of a variable-rate loan term, and making
more loans subject to provisions for higher cost loans, new disclosures, and
certain other revisions; and |
|
|
|
|
Creates the Financial Stability Oversight Council, which will
recommend to the Federal Reserve Board increasingly strict rules for capital,
leverage, liquidity, risk management and other requirements as companies grow in
size and complexity. |
The environment in which banking organizations will operate after the financial crisis,
including legislative and regulatory changes affecting capital, liquidity, supervision, permissible
activities, corporate governance and compensation, changes in fiscal policy and steps to eliminate
government support for banking organizations, may have long-term effects on the business
model and profitability of banking organizations, the full extent of which
- 55 -
cannot now be foreseen. Many
aspects of the Dodd-Frank Act remain subject to rulemaking and will take effect over several years,
making it difficult to anticipate the overall financial impact on M&T, its customers or the
financial industry more generally. Provisions in the legislation that affect deposit insurance
assessments, payment of interest on demand deposits and interchange fees could increase the costs
associated with deposits as well as place limitations on certain revenues those deposits may
generate. Provisions in the legislation that revoke the Tier 1 capital treatment of trust preferred
securities and otherwise require revisions to the capital requirements of M&T and M&T Bank could
require M&T and M&T Bank to seek other sources of capital in the future. The impact of new rules
relating to overdraft fee practices and debit card-interchange fees are discussed herein under the
heading Other Income.
Supplemental Reporting of Non-GAAP Results of Operations
As a result of business combinations and other acquisitions, the Company had
intangible assets consisting of goodwill and core deposit and other intangible assets totaling $3.8
billion at June 30, 2011 and $3.7 billion at each of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2010. Included
in such intangible assets was goodwill of $3.5 billion at each of those respective dates.
Amortization of core deposit and other intangible assets, after tax effect, was $9 million ($.07
per diluted common share) during each of the second quarters of 2011
and 2010 and $7 million ($.06
per diluted common share) during the initial 2011 quarter. For the six-month periods ended June
30, 2011 and 2010, amortization of core deposit and other intangible assets, after tax effect,
totaled $16 million ($.13 per diluted common share) and $19 million ($.16 per diluted common
share), respectively.
M&T consistently provides supplemental reporting of its results on a net operating or
tangible basis, from which M&T excludes the after-tax effect of amortization of core deposit and
other intangible assets (and the related goodwill, core deposit intangible and other intangible
asset balances, net of applicable deferred tax amounts) and gains and expenses associated with
merging acquired operations into the Company, since such items are considered by management to be
nonoperating in nature. Although net operating income as defined by M&T is not a GAAP measure,
M&Ts management believes that this information helps investors understand the effect of
acquisition activity in reported results.
Net operating income aggregated $289 million in the second quarter of 2011, compared with $198
million in the corresponding quarter of 2010. Diluted net operating earnings per common share for
the recent quarter were $2.16, compared with $1.53 in the second quarter of 2010. Net operating
income and diluted net operating earnings per common share were $216 million and $1.67,
respectively, in the initial quarter of 2011. For the first six months of 2011, net operating
income and diluted net operating earnings per common share were $506 million and $3.83,
respectively, compared with $359 million and $2.77, respectively, in the similar 2010 period.
Net operating income in the second quarter of 2011 represented an annualized rate of return on
average tangible assets of 1.69%, compared with 1.23% and 1.36% in the second quarter of 2010 and
first quarter of 2011, respectively. Net operating income expressed as an annualized return on
average tangible common equity was 24.40% in the recently completed quarter, compared with 20.36%
and 20.16% in the quarters ended June 30, 2010 and March 31, 2011, respectively. For the first
half of 2011, net operating income represented an annualized return on average tangible assets and
average tangible common shareholders equity of 1.53% and 22.37%, respectively, compared with 1.11%
and 18.89%, respectively, in the six-month period ended June 30, 2010.
- 56 -
Reconciliations of GAAP amounts with corresponding non-GAAP amounts are provided in table
2.
Taxable-equivalent Net Interest Income
Taxable-equivalent net interest income increased 3% to $593 million in the second quarter of 2011
from $573 million in the year-earlier quarter. That improvement was the result of a $3.6 billion
rise in average earning assets, partially offset by a 9 basis point (hundredths of one percent)
narrowing of the Companys net interest margin, or taxable-equivalent net interest income expressed
as an annualized percentage of average earning assets. Taxable-equivalent net interest income
totaled $575 million in the first quarter of 2011. The recent quarters improvement from the
initial 2011 quarter resulted from a $4.0 billion, or 7%, increase in average earning assets,
partially offset by a 17 basis point narrowing of the net interest margin. The increase in average
earning assets in the recent quarter as compared with the second quarter of 2010 and the initial
2011 quarter was predominantly the result of earning assets obtained in the acquisition of
Wilmington Trust, which at the May 16, 2011 acquisition date totaled approximately $9.6 billion.
The recent quarters narrowing of the net interest margin as compared with the second quarter of
2010 and the initial 2011 quarter was partially attributable to the Wilmington Trust acquisition.
Also contributing to the narrowing were significantly higher earning balances on deposit with the
Federal Reserve Bank of New York and higher amounts of resale agreements.
For the first half of 2011, taxable-equivalent net interest income was $1.17 billion, 3%
higher than $1.14 billion in the corresponding 2010 period. That increase was largely attributable
to a rise in average earning assets, which rose $1.3 billion or 2% from $60.1 billion in the first
six months of 2010 to $61.4 billion in the first half of 2011. Also contributing to the higher net
interest income in 2011 was a 2 basis point increase in the Companys net interest margin. The
growth in average earning assets was largely the result of earning assets obtained in the
acquisition of Wilmington Trust on May 16, 2011.
Average loans and leases rose $4.2 billion, or 8%, to $55.5 billion in the second quarter of
2011 from $51.3 billion in the year-earlier quarter. Included in average loans and leases in the
recent quarter were loans obtained in the Wilmington Trust acquisition. Loans associated with
Wilmington Trust totaled $6.4 billion on the May 16, 2011 acquisition date, consisting of
approximately $1.4 billion of commercial loans and leases, $3.2 billion of commercial real estate
loans, $680 million of residential real estate loans and $1.1 billion of consumer loans. Including
the impact of the acquired loan balances, commercial loans and leases averaged $14.6 billion in the
second quarter of 2011, up $1.5 billion or 12% from $13.1 billion in the year-earlier quarter.
Average commercial real estate loans rose $1.7 billion, or 8%, to $22.5 billion in the recent
quarter from $20.8 billion in the second quarter of 2010. That increase was predominantly due to
the impact of loans obtained in the acquisition of Wilmington Trust. Average residential real
estate loans outstanding increased $906 million, or 16%, to $6.6 billion in the second quarter of
2011 from the $5.7 billion averaged in the year-earlier quarter. Included in that portfolio were
loans held for sale, which averaged $229 million in the recent quarter, compared with $363 million
in the second quarter of 2010. Excluding loans held for sale, average residential real estate
loans increased $1.0 billion from the second quarter of 2010 to the second quarter of 2011. That
growth was largely due to the Companys decision to retain for portfolio during the fourth quarter
of 2010 and a portion of the initial 2011 quarter a higher proportion of
originated loans rather than selling them. Loans obtained in the Wilmington Trust transaction also
contributed to the increase. Average consumer loans
totaled $11.8 billion in each of the recent
quarter and the second quarter of 2010. The positive impact from consumer loans obtained in the
Wilmington
- 57 -
Trust acquisition was offset by lower average balances of automobile and home equity
loans (excluding Wilmington Trust loans).
Average loan balances in the recent quarter rose $3.5 billion, or 7%, from the first quarter
of 2011. Average outstanding commercial loan and lease balances increased $1.1 billion, or 8%,
from 2011s initial quarter. Average outstanding balances of commercial real estate loans rose
$1.5 billion, or 7%, in 2011s second quarter as compared with the immediately preceding quarter.
Residential real estate loans averaged $6.6 billion in the recent quarter, up $504 million, or 8%,
as compared with the first quarter of 2011. Average consumer loans increased $467 million, or 4%,
from 2011s first quarter. The majority of the growth in the respective loan categories resulted
from the loans obtained in the acquisition of Wilmington Trust. The accompanying table summarizes
quarterly changes in the major components of the loan and lease portfolio.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AVERAGE LOANS AND LEASES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(net of unearned discount) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dollars in millions |
|
|
|
|
|
Percent increase |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( decrease) from |
|
|
|
2nd Qtr. |
|
|
2nd Qtr. |
|
|
1st Qtr. |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
Commercial, financial, etc. |
|
$ |
14,623 |
|
|
|
12 |
% |
|
|
8 |
% |
Real estate commercial |
|
|
22,471 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
Real estate consumer |
|
|
6,559 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
Consumer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Automobile |
|
|
2,730 |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
3 |
|
Home equity lines |
|
|
5,902 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
Home equity loans |
|
|
732 |
|
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
2,444 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total consumer |
|
|
11,808 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
55,461 |
|
|
|
8 |
% |
|
|
7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the first half of 2011, average loans and leases totaled $53.7 billion, $2.1 billion or 4%
above $51.6 billion in the similar period of 2010. Loans obtained in the Wilmington Trust
acquisition were the predominant factor for that increase.
The investment securities portfolio averaged $6.4 billion in the second quarter of 2011,
compared with $8.4 billion and $7.2 billion in the year-earlier quarter and first quarter of 2011,
respectively. The declines from the second quarter of 2010 and the initial 2011 quarter reflect
the impact of sales of securities late in the first quarter of 2011 and in the recent quarter, as
well as maturities and paydowns of mortgage-backed securities, partially offset by second quarter
2011 purchases of residential mortgage-backed securities guaranteed by the Government National
Mortgage Association (Ginnie Mae). For the first six months of 2011 and 2010, investment
securities averaged $6.8 billion and $8.3 billion, respectively. The Wilmington Trust acquisition
added approximately $510 million to the investment securities portfolio on the May 16, 2011
acquisition date. The investment securities portfolio is largely comprised of residential
mortgage-backed securities and CMOs, debt securities issued by municipalities, capital preferred
securities issued by certain financial institutions, and shorter-term U.S. Treasury and federal
agency notes. When purchasing investment securities, the Company considers its overall interest-rate risk profile as well as the
adequacy of expected returns relative to the risks assumed, including prepayments. In managing its
investment securities portfolio, the Company occasionally sells investment securities as a result
of changes in interest rates and spreads, actual or anticipated prepayments, credit risk associated
with a particular security, or as a result of restructuring its investment securities portfolio in
connection with a business combination.
Near the end of the first quarter, the Company sold
certain residential mortgage-backed securities guaranteed by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac that were
- 58 -
held in the available-for-sale portfolio. Those securities had an amortized cost of approximately
$484 million, but because the transaction occurred near the end of the first quarter they did not
have a significant effect on that quarters average balances. During the recent quarter, the
Company sold certain residential mortgage-backed securities guaranteed by Fannie Mae and Freddie
Mac, collateralized debt obligations and capital preferred securities, all held in the
available-for-sale portfolio, with an amortized cost of $1.21 billion. The Company sold the
securities in connection with the acquisition of Wilmington Trust in order to manage its balance
sheet size and composition and resultant capital ratios. The recent quarter purchase of $1.2
billion of residential mortgage-backed securities guaranteed by Ginnie Mae provided a replenishment
of the investment securities portfolio at an improved risk-weighting. Those purchases added
approximately $500 million to the average balance of investment securities in 2011s second
quarter.
The Company regularly reviews its investment securities for declines in value below amortized
cost that might be characterized as other than temporary. During the recent quarter, an
other-than-temporary impairment charge of $27 million (pre-tax) was recognized related to the
Companys portfolio of privately issued residential CMOs. An other-than-temporary impairment
charge of $22 million (pre-tax) was recognized in the second quarter of 2010. Approximately $12
million of that charge related to AIB ADSs and $10 million related to certain privately issued CMOs
and CDOs held in the Companys available-for-sale investment securities portfolio. The AIB ADSs
were obtained in the 2003 acquisition of a subsidiary of AIB and were held to satisfy options to
purchase such shares granted by that subsidiary to certain employees. Factors contributing to that
impairment charge included mounting credit and other losses incurred by AIB, the issuance of AIB
common stock in lieu of dividend payments on certain preferred stock issuances held by the Irish
government resulting in significant dilution of AIB common shareholders, and public announcements
by Irish government officials suggesting that increased government support, which could further
dilute AIB common shareholders, may be necessary. During the initial 2011 quarter,
other-than-temporary impairment charges of $16 million (pre-tax) were recognized related to certain
privately issued CMOs. Poor economic conditions, high unemployment and depressed real estate
values are significant factors contributing to the recognition of the other-than-temporary
impairment charges related to the CMOs and CDOs. Based on managements assessment of future cash
flows associated with individual investment securities, as of June 30, 2011 the Company concluded
that the remaining declines associated with the rest of the investment securities portfolio were
temporary in nature. A further discussion of fair values of investment securities is included
herein under the heading Capital. Additional information about the investment securities
portfolio is included in notes 3 and 12 of Notes to Financial Statements.
Other earning assets include interest-earning deposits at the Federal Reserve Bank of New York
and other banks, trading account assets, federal funds sold and agreements to resell securities.
Those other earning assets in the aggregate averaged $1.5 billion in the recent quarter, compared
with $157 million and $240 million in the second quarter of 2010 and the first quarter of 2011,
respectively. Interest-bearing deposits at banks averaged $804 million in the second quarter of
2011, up from $81 million in the year- earlier period and $115 million in the initial 2011 quarter. The significantly higher
balances in the recent quarter were due to increased deposits at the Federal Reserve Bank of New
York resulting from the Wilmington Trust acquisition. Also reflected in other earning assets were
purchases of investment securities under agreements to resell, which averaged $613 million, $5
million and $2 million in the quarters ended June 30, 2011, June 30, 2010 and March 31, 2011,
respectively. The higher level of resell agreements in the recent quarter as compared with the
second quarter of 2010 and the first quarter of 2011 was due to the need to fulfill collateral
requirements associated with certain municipal deposits.
Agreements to resell securities, which
totaled $380 million at June 30, 2011, are accounted
- 59 -
for similar to collateralized loans, with
changes in market value of the collateral monitored by the Company to ensure sufficient coverage.
There were no such agreements outstanding at June 30, 2010 or December 31, 2010. The amounts of
investment securities and other earning assets held by the Company are influenced by such factors
as demand for loans, which generally yield more than investment securities and other earning
assets, ongoing repayments, the level of deposits, and management of balance sheet size and
resulting capital ratios.
As a result of the changes described herein, average earning assets totaled $63.4 billion in
the recent quarter, compared with $59.8 billion in the similar quarter of 2010 and $59.4 billion in
the first quarter of 2011. Average earning assets totaled $61.4 billion and $60.1 billion during
the six-month periods ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
The most significant source of funding for the Company is core deposits. During 2010 and prior
years, the Company considered noninterest-bearing deposits, interest-bearing transaction accounts,
savings deposits and domestic time deposits under $100,000 as core deposits. A provision of the
Dodd-Frank Act permanently increased the maximum amount of FDIC deposit insurance for financial
institutions to $250,000 per depositor. That maximum was $100,000 per depositor until 2009, when
it was raised to $250,000 temporarily through December 31, 2013. As a result of the permanently
increased deposit insurance coverage, effective December 31, 2010 the Company considers time
deposits of $250,000 or less as core deposits. The Companys branch network is its principal
source of core deposits, which generally carry lower interest rates than wholesale funds of
comparable maturities. Certificates of deposit of $250,000 or less generated on a nationwide basis
by M&T Bank, National Association (M&T Bank, N.A.), a wholly owned bank subsidiary of M&T, are
also included in core deposits. Average core deposits aggregated $50.5 billion in the second
quarter of 2011, compared with $43.4 billion in the year-earlier quarter and $46.2 billion in the
initial 2011 quarter. The change in the Companys definition of core deposits to include time
deposits from $100,000 to $250,000 increased average core deposits by approximately $970 million
and $1.0 billion in the first and second quarters of 2011, respectively. The Wilmington
acquisition added approximately $6.6 billion of core deposits on May 16, 2011. Excluding deposits obtained in
that transaction, the growth in core deposits since the second quarter of 2010 was due, in part, to
the lack of attractive alternative investments available to the Companys customers resulting from
lower interest rates and from the economic environment in the U.S. The low interest rate
environment has resulted in a shift in customer savings trends, as average time deposits have
continued to decline, while average noninterest-bearing deposits and savings deposits have
increased. The following table provides an analysis of quarterly changes in the components of
average core deposits. For the six-month periods ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, core deposits
averaged $48.4 billion and $43.2 billion, respectively.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AVERAGE CORE DEPOSITS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dollars in millions |
|
|
|
|
|
Percent increase from |
|
|
|
2nd Qtr. |
|
|
2nd Qtr. |
|
|
1st Qtr. |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
NOW accounts |
|
$ |
712 |
|
|
|
19 |
% |
|
|
19 |
% |
Savings deposits |
|
|
28,641 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
Time deposits (a) |
|
|
4,971 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
Noninterest-bearing deposits |
|
|
16,195 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
50,519 |
|
|
|
16 |
% |
|
|
9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Average time deposits considered core deposits in the first and second quarters of 2011
represented time deposits of $250,000 or less. In the second quarter of 2010, average time
deposits considered core deposits were those with balances less than $100,000. |
- 60 -
In addition to core deposits, time deposits over $250,000, deposits originated through the
Companys Cayman Islands branch office, and brokered deposits provide sources of funding for the
Company. Time deposits over $250,000, excluding brokered certificates of deposit, averaged $484
million in the second quarter of 2011, compared with $520 million in the initial quarter of 2011.
Similar time deposits over $100,000 averaged $1.7 billion in the second quarter of 2010. Cayman
Islands branch deposits averaged $819 million, $972 million and $1.2 billion for the three-month
periods ended June 30, 2011, June 30, 2010 and March 31, 2011, respectively. Average brokered time
deposits totaled $1.2 billion in the recently completed quarter, compared with $709 million in the
year-earlier quarter and $482 million in the first quarter of 2011. Brokered time deposits
obtained in the acquisition of Wilmington Trust totaled $1.4 billion on May 16, 2011. The Company
also had brokered NOW and brokered money-market deposit accounts which in the aggregate averaged
$1.4 billion during the second quarter of 2011, compared with $1.2 billion and $1.3 billion during
the year-earlier quarter and the first quarter of 2011, respectively. The levels of brokered NOW
and brokered money-market deposits reflect the demand for such deposits, largely resulting from
continued uncertain economic markets and the desire of brokerage firms to earn reasonable yields
while ensuring that customer deposits are fully insured. Cayman Islands branch deposits and
brokered deposits have been used by the Company as alternatives to short-term borrowings.
Additional amounts of Cayman Islands branch deposits or brokered deposits may be added in the
future depending on market conditions, including demand by customers and other investors for those
deposits, and the cost of funds available from alternative sources at the time.
The Company also uses borrowings from banks, securities dealers, various Federal Home Loan
Banks, the Federal Reserve and others as sources of funding. Short-term borrowings averaged $707
million in the recent quarter, compared with $1.8 billion in the second quarter of 2010 and $1.3
billion in the initial quarter of 2011. Included in short-term borrowings were unsecured federal
funds borrowings, which generally mature on the next business day, which averaged $548 million and
$1.6 billion in the second quarters of 2011 and 2010, respectively, compared with $1.2 billion in the first quarter of
2011. Overnight federal funds borrowings represented the largest component of short-term
borrowings and totaled $290 million at June 30, 2011, $2.0 billion at June 30,
2010 and $826 million at December 31, 2010.
Long-term borrowings averaged $7.1 billion in the second quarter of 2011, compared with $9.5
billion in the corresponding quarter of 2010 and $7.4 billion in the first quarter of 2011.
Included in average long-term borrowings were amounts borrowed from the Federal Home Loan Bank
(FHLB) of New York, the FHLB of Atlanta and the FHLB of Pittsburgh of $2.0 billion and $4.4
billion in the second quarters of 2011 and 2010, respectively, and $2.5 billion in the first
quarter of 2011, and subordinated capital notes of $2.0
billion in the recent quarter, $1.9 billion in the year-earlier quarter and $1.7 billion in the initial 2011 quarter. Subordinated capital
notes assumed in connection with the Wilmington Trust acquisition totaled $450 million at May 16,
2011. The Company has utilized interest rate swap agreements to modify the repricing
characteristics of certain components of long-term debt. As of June 30, 2011, swap agreements were
used to hedge approximately $900 million of fixed rate subordinated notes. Further information on
interest rate swap agreements is provided in note 10 of Notes to Financial Statements. Junior
subordinated debentures associated with trust preferred securities that were included in average
long-term borrowings were $1.2 billion in each of the quarters ended June 30, 2011, June 30, 2010
and March 31, 2011. Additional information regarding junior subordinated debentures is provided in
note 5 of Notes to Financial Statements. Also included in long-term borrowings were agreements to
repurchase securities, which averaged $1.6 billion during each of the second quarters of 2011 and
2010 and the first quarter of 2011. The agreements have various
repurchase dates through 2017, however, the contractual maturities of the underlying securities extend
- 61 -
beyond such repurchase
dates.
Changes in the composition of the Companys earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities,
as described herein, as well as changes in interest rates and spreads, can impact net interest
income. Net interest spread, or the difference between the taxable-equivalent yield on earning
assets and the rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities, was 3.51% in the second quarter of 2011,
compared with 3.59% in the year-earlier quarter. The yield on earning assets during the recent
quarter was 4.40%, down 23 basis points from 4.63% in the second quarter of 2010, while the rate
paid on interest-bearing liabilities declined 15 basis points to .89% from 1.04% in the second
quarter of 2010. In the first quarter of 2011, the net interest spread was 3.69%, the yield on
earning assets was 4.60% and the rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities was .91%. The 8 basis
point narrowing in spread from the second quarter of 2010 to the recent quarter and the 18 basis
point narrowing in spread from the initial 2011 quarter to the second quarter of 2011 were each
partially attributable to the acquisition of Wilmington Trust. Also contributing to the narrowing
of the spread were significantly higher earning balances in the recent quarter on lower-yielding
deposits with the Federal Reserve Bank of New York and resale agreements. For the first half of
2011, the net interest spread was 3.59%, an increase of 2 basis points from the similar 2010
period. The yield on earning assets and the rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities were 4.49%
and .90%, respectively, during the first six months of 2011, compared with 4.61% and 1.04%,
respectively, in the corresponding period of 2010.
Net interest-free funds consist largely of noninterest-bearing demand deposits and
shareholders equity, partially offset by bank owned life insurance and non-earning assets,
including goodwill and core deposit and other intangible assets. Net interest-free funds averaged
$17.3 billion in the recent quarter, compared with $14.3 billion in the second quarter of 2010
and $15.5 billion in the first quarter of 2011. The rise in net interest-free funds in the
two most recent quarters as compared with the second quarter of 2010 was largely the result of
higher average balances of noninterest-bearing deposits. Such deposits averaged $16.2 billion,
$13.6 billion and $14.5 billion in the quarters ended June
30, 2011, June 30, 2010 and March 31,2011, respectively. In connection with the Wilmington Trust acquisition, the Company added
noninterest-bearing deposits totaling $2.0 billion at the acquisition date. During the first six
months of 2011 and 2010, average net interest-free funds aggregated $16.4 billion and $14.0
billion, respectively. Goodwill and core deposit and other intangible assets averaged $3.7 billion
during each of the quarters ended June 30, 2011 and June 30, 2010, compared with $3.6 billion
during the quarter ended March 31, 2011. Core deposit and other intangible assets added from the
Wilmington Trust acquisition were $176 million on May 16, 2011. There was no goodwill recorded as
a result of the acquisition. The cash surrender value of bank owned life insurance averaged $1.5
billion in each of the quarters ended June 30, 2011, June 30, 2010 and March 31, 2011. Increases
in the cash surrender value of bank owned life insurance are not included in interest income, but
rather are recorded in other revenues from operations. The contribution of net interest-free
funds to net interest margin was .24% in the recent quarter, compared with .25% and .23% in the
second quarter of 2010 and the initial 2011 quarter, respectively. That contribution for each of
the first six months of 2011 and 2010 was .24%.
Reflecting the changes to the net interest spread and the contribution of interest-free funds
as described herein, the Companys net interest margin was 3.75% in the recent quarter, compared
with 3.84% in the year-earlier quarter and 3.92% in the first quarter of 2011. During the first
six months of 2011 and 2010, the net interest margin was 3.83% and 3.81%, respectively. Future
changes in market interest rates or spreads, as well as changes in the composition of the Companys
portfolios of earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities that result in reductions in spreads,
could adversely impact the Companys net interest income and net interest margin.
- 62 -
Management assesses the potential impact of future changes in interest rates and spreads by
projecting net interest income under several interest rate scenarios. In managing interest rate
risk, the Company has utilized interest rate swap agreements to modify the repricing
characteristics of certain portions of its portfolios of earning assets and interest-bearing
liabilities. Periodic settlement amounts arising from these agreements are generally reflected in
either the yields earned on assets or the rates paid on interest-bearing liabilities. The notional
amount of interest rate swap agreements entered into for interest rate risk management purposes was
$900 million at each of June 30, 2011, December 31, 2010 and March 31, 2011, and was $1.0 billion
at June 30, 2010. Under the terms of those swap agreements, the Company received payments based on
the outstanding notional amount of the swap agreements at fixed rates and made payments at variable
rates. Those swap agreements were designated as fair value hedges of certain fixed rate long-term
borrowings and, to a lesser extent at June 30, 2010, certain fixed rate time deposits. There were
no interest rate swap agreements designated as cash flow hedges at those respective dates.
In a fair value hedge, the fair value of the derivative (the interest rate swap agreement) and
changes in the fair value of the hedged item are recorded in the Companys consolidated balance
sheet with the corresponding gain or loss recognized in current earnings. The difference between
changes in the fair value of the interest rate swap agreements and the hedged items represents
hedge ineffectiveness and is recorded in other revenues from operations in the Companys
consolidated statement of income. In a cash flow hedge, unlike in a fair value hedge, the
effective portion of the derivatives gain or loss is initially reported as a component of other
comprehensive income and subsequently reclassified into earnings when the
forecasted transaction affects earnings. The ineffective portion of the gain or loss is
reported in other revenues from operations immediately. The amounts of hedge ineffectiveness
recognized during the quarters ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 and the quarter ended March 31, 2011
were not material to the Companys results of operations. The estimated aggregate fair value of
interest rate swap agreements designated as fair value hedges represented gains of approximately
$106 million, $111 million, $84 million and $97 million at June 30, 2011, June 30, 2010, March 31,
2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively. The fair values of such swap agreements were
substantially offset by changes in the fair values of the hedged items. The changes in the fair
values of the interest rate swap agreements and the hedged items primarily result from the effects
of changing interest rates and spreads. The Companys credit exposure as of June 30, 2011 with
respect to the estimated fair value of interest rate swap agreements used for managing interest
rate risk has been substantially mitigated through master netting arrangements with trading account
interest rate contracts with the same counterparty as well as counterparty postings of $61 million
of collateral with the Company.
The weighted-average rates to be received and paid under interest rate swap agreements
currently in effect were 6.07% and 1.79%, respectively, at June 30, 2011. The average notional
amounts of interest rate swap agreements entered into for interest rate risk management purposes,
the related effect on net interest income and margin, and the weighted-average interest rates paid
or received on those swap agreements are presented in the accompanying table. Additional
information about the Companys use of interest rate swap agreements and other derivatives is
included in note 10 of Notes to Financial Statements.
- 63 -
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INTEREST RATE SWAP AGREEMENTS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dollars in thousands |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended June 30 |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Rate(a) |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Rate(a) |
|
Increase (decrease) in: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
% |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
% |
Interest expense |
|
|
(9,491 |
) |
|
|
(.08 |
) |
|
|
(10,967 |
) |
|
|
(.10 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest
income/margin |
|
$ |
9,491 |
|
|
|
.06 |
% |
|
$ |
10,967 |
|
|
|
.07 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average notional
amount |
|
$ |
900,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,053,175 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rate received(b) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.09 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.37 |
% |
Rate paid(b) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.86 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.19 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30 |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Rate(a) |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Rate(a) |
|
Increase (decrease) in: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
% |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
% |
Interest expense |
|
|
(19,005 |
) |
|
|
(.09 |
) |
|
|
(22,219 |
) |
|
|
(.10 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income/margin |
|
$ |
19,005 |
|
|
|
.06 |
% |
|
$ |
22,219 |
|
|
|
.07 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
notional amount |
|
$ |
900,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,057,683 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rate received(b) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.12 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.38 |
% |
Rate paid(b) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.86 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.15 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Computed as an annualized percentage of average earning assets or
interest-bearing liabilities. |
(b) |
|
Weighted-average rate paid or received on interest rate swap agreements
in effect during the period. |
As a financial intermediary, the Company is exposed to various risks, including liquidity and
market risk. Liquidity refers to the Companys ability to ensure that sufficient cash flow and
liquid assets are available to satisfy current and future obligations, including demands for loans
and deposit withdrawals, funding operating costs, and other corporate purposes. Liquidity risk
arises whenever the maturities of financial instruments included in assets and liabilities differ.
M&Ts banking subsidiaries have access to additional funding sources through borrowings from the
FHLB of New York, lines of credit with the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, and other available
borrowing facilities. The Company has, from time to time, issued subordinated capital notes to
provide liquidity and enhance regulatory capital ratios. Such notes qualify for inclusion in the
Companys total capital as defined by Federal regulators.
The Company has informal and sometimes reciprocal sources of funding available through various
arrangements for unsecured short-term borrowings from a wide group of banks and other financial
institutions. Short-term federal funds borrowings were $290 million, $2.0 billion and $826 million
at June 30, 2011, June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2010, respectively. In general, these borrowings
were unsecured and matured on the following business day. As previously noted, Cayman
Islands branch deposits and brokered certificates of deposits have been used by the Company as an
alternative to short-term borrowings. Cayman Islands branch deposits also generally mature on the
next business day and totaled $552 million at June 30, 2011, $551 million at June 30, 2010 and $1.6
billion at December 31, 2010. Outstanding brokered time deposits at June 30, 2011, June 30, 2010
and December 31, 2010 were $1.9 billion, $662 million and $485 million, respectively. Brokered
time deposits assumed in the Wilmington Trust transaction totaled $1.4 billion at the acquisition
date. At June 30, 2011, the weighted-average remaining term to maturity of brokered time deposits
was 11 months. Certain of these brokered time deposits have provisions that allow for early
redemption. The Company also has brokered NOW and brokered money-market deposit accounts which
aggregated $1.4
- 64 -
billion, $1.5 billion and $1.3 billion at June 30, 2011, June 30, 2010 and December
31, 2010, respectively.
The Companys ability to obtain funding from these or other sources could be negatively
impacted should the Company experience a substantial deterioration in its financial condition or
its debt ratings, or should the availability of short-term funding become restricted due to a
disruption in the financial markets. The Company attempts to quantify such credit-event risk by
modeling scenarios that estimate the liquidity impact resulting from a short-term ratings downgrade
over various grading levels. Such impact is estimated by attempting to measure the effect on
available unsecured lines of credit, available capacity from secured borrowing sources and
securitizable assets. In addition to deposits and borrowings, other sources of liquidity include
maturities of investment securities and other earning assets, repayments of loans and investment
securities, and cash generated from operations, such as fees collected for services.
Certain customers of the Company obtain financing through the issuance of variable rate demand
bonds (VRDBs). The VRDBs are generally enhanced by letters of credit provided by M&T Bank. M&T
Bank oftentimes acts as remarketing agent for the VRDBs and, at its discretion, may from
time-to-time own some of the VRDBs while such instruments are remarketed. When this occurs, the
VRDBs are classified as trading assets in the Companys consolidated balance sheet. Nevertheless,
M&T Bank is not contractually obligated to purchase the VRDBs. The value of VRDBs in the Companys
trading account totaled $29 million and $22 million at June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, and
$107 million at December 31, 2010. The total amount of VRDBs outstanding backed by M&T Bank
letters of credit was $1.9 billion at each of June 30, 2011 and June 30, 2010 and $2.0 billion at
December 31, 2010. M&T Bank also serves as remarketing agent for most of those bonds.
The Company enters into contractual obligations in the normal course of business which require
future cash payments. Such obligations include, among others, payments related to deposits,
borrowings, leases and other contractual commitments. Off-balance sheet commitments to customers
may impact liquidity, including commitments to extend credit, standby letters of credit, commercial
letters of credit, financial guarantees and indemnification contracts, and commitments to sell real
estate loans. Because many of these commitments or contracts expire without being funded in whole
or in part, the contract amounts are not necessarily indicative of future cash flows. Further
discussion of these commitments is provided in note 13 of Notes to Financial Statements.
M&Ts primary
source of funds to pay for operating expenses, shareholder dividends and treasury
stock repurchases has historically been the receipt of dividends from
its banking subsidiaries, which are subject to various regulatory limitations. Dividends from any
banking subsidiary to M&T are limited by the amount of earnings of the banking subsidiary in the
current year and the two preceding years. For purposes of that test, at June 30, 2011
approximately $939 million was available for payment of dividends to M&T from banking subsidiaries.
These historic sources of cash flow have been augmented in the past by the issuance of trust
preferred securities and senior notes payable. Information regarding trust preferred securities
and the related junior subordinated debentures is included in note 5 of Notes to Financial
Statements. The $300 million 5.375% senior notes of M&T that were issued in 2007 mature in May
2012. M&T also maintains a $30 million line of credit with an unaffiliated commercial bank, of
which there were no borrowings outstanding at June 30, 2011 or at December 31, 2010.
Management closely
monitors the Companys liquidity position on an ongoing basis for
compliance with internal policies and believes that available sources of liquidity are adequate to
meet funding needs anticipated in the normal course of business. Management does not anticipate
engaging in any activities, either currently or in the long-term, for which adequate funding would
not be available and would therefore result in a significant strain on liquidity at either M&T or
its subsidiary banks.
- 65 -
Market risk is the risk of loss from adverse changes in the market prices and/or interest
rates of the Companys financial instruments. The primary market risk the Company is exposed to is
interest rate risk. Interest rate risk arises from the Companys core banking activities of
lending and deposit-taking, because assets and liabilities reprice at different times and by
different amounts as interest rates change. As a result, net interest income earned by the Company
is subject to the effects of changing interest rates. The Company measures interest rate risk by
calculating the variability of net interest income in future periods under various interest rate
scenarios using projected balances for earning assets, interest-bearing liabilities and derivatives
used to hedge interest rate risk. Managements philosophy toward interest rate risk management is
to limit the variability of net interest income. The balances of financial instruments used in the
projections are based on expected growth from forecasted business opportunities, anticipated
prepayments of loans and investment securities, and expected maturities of investment securities,
loans and deposits. Management uses a value of equity model to supplement the modeling technique
described above. Those supplemental analyses are based on discounted cash flows associated with
on- and off-balance sheet financial instruments. Such analyses are modeled to reflect changes in
interest rates and provide management with a long-term interest rate risk metric.
The Companys Risk Management Committee, which includes members of senior management, monitors
the sensitivity of the Companys net interest income to changes in interest rates with the aid of a
computer model that forecasts net interest income under different interest rate scenarios. In
modeling changing interest rates, the Company considers different yield curve shapes that consider
both parallel (that is, simultaneous changes in interest rates at each point on the yield curve)
and non-parallel (that is, allowing interest rates at points on the yield curve to vary by
different amounts) shifts in the yield curve. In utilizing the model, market-implied forward
interest rates over the subsequent twelve months are generally used to determine a base interest
rate scenario for the net interest income simulation. That calculated base net interest income is
then compared to the income calculated under the varying interest rate scenarios. The model
considers the impact of ongoing lending and deposit-gathering activities, as well as
interrelationships in the magnitude and timing of the repricing of financial instruments, including
the effect of changing interest rates on expected prepayments and maturities. When deemed prudent,
management has taken actions to mitigate exposure to interest rate risk through the use of on- or
off-balance sheet financial instruments and intends to do so in the future. Possible actions
include, but are not limited to, changes in the pricing of loan and deposit products, modifying the
composition of earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, and adding to, modifying or
terminating existing interest rate swap agreements or other financial instruments used for interest
rate risk management purposes.
The accompanying table as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 displays the estimated impact
on net interest income from non-trading financial instruments in the base scenario described above
resulting from parallel changes in interest rates across repricing categories during the first
modeling year.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SENSITIVITY OF NET INTEREST INCOME |
|
|
|
TO CHANGES IN INTEREST RATES Dollars in thousands |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calculated increase (decrease) |
|
|
|
in projected net interest income |
|
Changes in interest rates |
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
+200 basis points |
|
$ |
127,468 |
|
|
|
67,255 |
|
+100 basis points |
|
|
67,999 |
|
|
|
35,594 |
|
-100 basis points |
|
|
(50,197 |
) |
|
|
(40,760 |
) |
-200 basis points |
|
|
(72,360 |
) |
|
|
(61,720 |
) |
The Company utilized many assumptions to calculate the impact that changes in interest rates
may have on net interest income. The more significant of those assumptions included the rate of
prepayments of mortgage-related assets, cash flows from derivative and other financial instruments
held for non-trading purposes, loan
- 66 -
and deposit volumes and pricing, and deposit maturities. In
the scenarios presented, the Company also assumed gradual changes in interest rates during a
twelve-month period of 100 and 200 basis points, as compared with the assumed base scenario. In
the event that a 100 or 200 basis point rate change cannot be achieved, the applicable rate changes
are limited to lesser amounts such that interest rates cannot be less than zero. The assumptions
used in interest rate sensitivity modeling are inherently uncertain and, as a result, the Company
cannot precisely predict the impact of changes in interest rates on net interest income. Actual
results may differ significantly from those presented due to the timing, magnitude and frequency of
changes in interest rates and changes in market conditions and interest rate differentials
(spreads) between maturity/repricing categories, as well as any actions, such as those previously
described, which management may take to counter such changes. The changes to projected net
interest income at June 30, 2011 as compared with December 31, 2010 were predominantly due to the
acquisition of Wilmington Trust. The most significant of those changes related to the rising
interest rate scenarios and were largely due to the addition of variable rate commercial loans and
commercial real estate loans that had been funded by Wilmington Trust using core deposits and fixed rate brokered
time deposits. In addition, higher cash balances obtained in the acquisition allowed the Company to reduce its reliance on variable rate
federal funds purchased. In light of the uncertainties and assumptions associated with the
process, the amounts presented in the table are not considered significant to the Companys past or
projected net interest income.
Changes in fair value of the Companys financial instruments can also result from a lack of
trading activity for similar instruments in the financial markets. That impact is most notable on
the values assigned to the Companys investment securities. Information about the fair valuation
of such securities is presented herein under the heading Capital and in notes 3 and 12 of Notes
to Financial Statements.
The Company engages in trading activities to meet the financial needs of customers, to fund
the Companys obligations under certain deferred compensation plans and, to a limited extent, to
profit from perceived market opportunities. Financial instruments utilized in trading activities
consist predominantly of interest rate contracts, such as swap agreements, and forward and futures
contracts related to foreign currencies, but have also included forward and futures contracts
related to mortgage-backed securities and investments in U.S. Treasury and other government
securities, mortgage-backed securities and mutual funds, and as previously described, a limited
number of VRDBs. The Company generally mitigates the foreign currency and interest rate risk
associated with trading activities by entering into offsetting trading positions. The amounts of
gross and net trading positions, as well as the type of trading activities conducted by the
Company, are subject to a well-defined series of potential loss exposure limits established by
management and approved by M&Ts Board of Directors. However, as with any non-government
guaranteed
financial instrument, the Company is exposed to credit risk associated with
counterparties to the Companys trading activities.
The notional amounts of interest rate contracts entered into for trading purposes totaled
$13.4 billion at June 30, 2011, compared with $12.4 billion and $12.8 billion at June 30, 2010 and
December 31, 2010, respectively. The notional amounts of foreign currency and other option and
futures contracts entered into for trading purposes aggregated $1.0 billion, $680 million and $769
million at June 30, 2011, June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2010, respectively. Although the notional
amounts of these trading contracts are not recorded in the consolidated balance sheet, the fair
values of all financial instruments used for trading activities are recorded in the consolidated
balance sheet. The fair values of all trading account assets and liabilities totaled $503 million
and $366 million, respectively, at June 30, 2011, $488 million and $380 million, respectively, at
June 30, 2010, and $524 million and $333 million, respectively, at December 31, 2010. Included in
trading account assets were assets related to deferred compensation plans totaling $36 million at
June 30, 2011, $33 million at June 30, 2010 and $35 million at December 31, 2010. Changes in the
fair value of such assets are recorded as trading account and foreign exchange gains in the
consolidated statement of income. Included in other liabilities in the consolidated balance
sheet at June 30, 2011 and 2010 were
- 67 -
$34 million and $35 million, respectively, of liabilities
related to deferred compensation plans, while at December 31, 2010 such liabilities related to
deferred compensation plans totaled $36 million. Changes in the balances of such liabilities due
to the valuation of allocated investment options to which the liabilities are indexed are recorded
in other costs of operations in the consolidated statement of income.
Given the Companys policies, limits and positions, management believes that the potential
loss exposure to the Company resulting from market risk associated with trading activities was not
material, however, as previously noted, the Company is exposed to credit risk associated with
counterparties to transactions related to the Companys trading activities. Additional information
about the Companys use of derivative financial instruments in its trading activities is included
in note 10 of Notes to Financial Statements.
Provision for Credit Losses
The Company maintains an allowance for credit losses that in managements judgment appropriately
reflects losses inherent in the loan and lease portfolio. A provision for credit losses is
recorded to adjust the level of the allowance as deemed necessary by management. The provision for
credit losses in the second quarter of 2011 was $63 million, compared with $85 million in the
year-earlier quarter and $75 million in the first quarter of 2011. For the six-month periods ended
June 30, 2011 and 2010, the provision for credit losses was $138 million and $190 million,
respectively. While the levels of the provision subsequent to 2007 have been higher than
historical levels, the Company has recently experienced improvement in some of its credit
quality metrics. Nevertheless, generally declining real estate valuations and higher than normal
levels of delinquencies and charge-offs have significantly affected the quality of the Companys
residential real estate-related loan portfolios. Specifically, the Companys alternative
(Alt-A) residential real estate loan portfolio and its residential real estate builder and
developer loan portfolio experienced the majority of the credit problems related to the turmoil in
the residential real estate market place. Alt-A loans represent residential real
estate loans that at origination typically included some form of limited borrower documentation
requirements as compared with more traditional residential real estate loans. Loans in the
Companys Alt-A portfolio were originated by the Company prior to 2008. The Company also experienced increased
levels of commercial and consumer loan charge-offs over the past three years due to, among other
things, higher unemployment levels and the recessionary economy.
- 68 -
Net loan charge-offs were $59 million in the recent quarter, compared with $82 million in the
year-earlier quarter and $74 million in the initial quarter of 2011. Net charge-offs as an
annualized percentage of average loans and leases were .43% in the second quarter of 2011, compared
with .64% and .58% in the quarters ended June 30, 2010 and March 31, 2011, respectively. Net
charge-offs for the six-month period ended June 30 aggregated $133 million in 2011 and $176 million
in 2010, representing .50% and .69%, respectively, of average loans and leases. A summary of net
charge-offs by loan type follows:
NET CHARGE-OFFS
BY LOAN/LEASE TYPE
In thousands
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year |
|
|
|
1st Qtr. |
|
|
2nd Qtr. |
|
|
to-date |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial, financial, etc. |
|
$11,862 |
|
|
12,650 |
|
|
24,512 |
|
Real estate: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
24,230 |
|
|
|
12,731 |
|
|
|
36,961 |
|
Residential |
|
|
14,666 |
|
|
|
13,839 |
|
|
|
28,505 |
|
Consumer |
|
|
23,480 |
|
|
|
19,894 |
|
|
|
43,374 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
74,238 |
|
|
|
59,114 |
|
|
|
133,352 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year |
|
|
|
1st Qtr. |
|
|
2nd Qtr. |
|
|
to-date |
|
Commercial, financial, etc. |
|
$ |
17,994 |
|
|
|
9,166 |
|
|
|
27,160 |
|
Real estate: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
30,226 |
|
|
|
35,449 |
|
|
|
65,675 |
|
Residential |
|
|
15,280 |
|
|
|
13,182 |
|
|
|
28,462 |
|
Consumer |
|
|
31,009 |
|
|
|
23,801 |
|
|
|
54,810 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
94,509 |
|
|
|
81,598 |
|
|
|
176,107 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in net charge-offs of commercial real estate loans were net charge-offs of loans to
residential homebuilders and developers of $6 million and $17 million for the quarters ended June
30, 2011 and June 30, 2010, and $18 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2011. Included in net
charge-offs of residential real estate loans were net charge-offs of Alt-A first mortgage loans of
$8 million in each of the two most recent quarters, compared with $9 million during the quarter
ended June 30, 2010. Included in net charge-offs of consumer loans and leases were net charge-offs
during the quarters ended June 30, 2011, June 30, 2010 and March 31, 2011, respectively, of:
indirect automobile loans of $5 million, $7 million and $6 million; recreational vehicle loans of
$5 million, $6 million and $6 million; and home equity loans and lines of credit, including Alt-A
second lien loans, of $8 million during each respective period. Including both first and second
lien mortgages, net charge-offs of Alt-A loans totaled $9 million, $10 million and $9 million for
the quarters ended June 30, 2011, June 30, 2010 and March 31, 2011, respectively.
Nonaccrual loans totaled $1.26 billion or 2.15% of total loans and leases outstanding at June
30, 2011, compared with $1.09 billion or 2.13% at June 30, 2010, $1.24 billion or 2.38% at December
31, 2010, and $1.21 billion or 2.32% at March 31, 2011. Reflected in nonaccrual loans at June 30,
2011 were $77 million of loans obtained in the Wilmington Trust acquisition, which predominantly
represented commercial revolving lines of credit that GAAP specifically excludes from the scope of
accounting for purchased impaired loans. The majority of such lines of credit were to builders and
developers of residential real estate properties and remained available for use to allow the real
estate projects to progress. Also contributing to the increase in nonaccrual loans from June 30,
2010 were loans transferred to nonaccrual status, including fourth quarter 2010 transfers of a $66
million relationship with a residential builder and developer and commercial construction
- 69 -
loans to
an owner/operator of retirement and assisted living facilities which totaled $66 million at June
30, 2011, and a recent quarter transfer of $21 million related to a residential builder and
developer. Partially offsetting the transfers to nonaccrual status were charge-offs and payments,
including the fourth quarter 2010 payoff of a $36 million relationship with a borrower in the
commercial real estate sector. The continuing softness in the residential real estate marketplace
has resulted in depressed real estate values and high levels of delinquencies, both for loans to
consumers and loans to builders and developers of residential real estate. Despite the recent
quarters decline in nonaccrual loans (exclusive of the impact of the Wilmington Trust
acquisition), conditions in the U.S. economy have resulted in generally higher levels of nonaccrual
loans than historically experienced by the Company.
Accruing loans past due 90 days or more were $373 million or .64% of total loans and leases at
June 30, 2011, compared with $203 million or .40% at June 30, 2010, $270 million or .52% at
December 31, 2010 and $264 million or .51% at March 31, 2011. Reflected in those loans at June 30,
2011 were $130 million of loans obtained in the Wilmington Trust acquisition that were past their
renewal date. For each of those loans, borrowers continued to currently make periodic payments as
required by their maturing loan agreements while new agreements between the borrowers and the
Company were being developed. Loans past due 90 days or more and accruing interest included $207
million, $188 million, $214 million and $215 million at June 30, 2011, June 30, 2010, December 31,
2010 and March 31, 2011, respectively, of loans guaranteed by government-related entities. Such
guaranteed loans included one-to-four family residential mortgage loans serviced by the Company
that were repurchased to reduce associated servicing costs, including a requirement to advance
principal and interest payments that had not been received from individual mortgagors. Despite the
loans being purchased by the Company, the insurance or guarantee by the applicable
government-related entity remains in force. The outstanding principal balances of the repurchased
loans are fully guaranteed by government-related entities and totaled $195 million, $171 million,
$191 million and $195 million at June 30, 2011, June 30, 2010, December 31, 2010
and March 31, 2011, respectively. Loans past due 90 days or more and accruing interest that
were guaranteed by government-related entities also included foreign commercial and industrial
loans supported by the Export-Import Bank of the United States that totaled $11 million at each of
June 30, 2011, December 31, 2010 and March 31, 2011, compared with $12 million at June 30, 2010.
Purchased impaired loans are loans obtained in acquisition transactions subsequent to 2008
that as of the acquisition date were specifically identified as displaying signs of credit
deterioration and for which the Company did not expect to collect all outstanding principal and
contractually required interest payments. Those loans were impaired at the date of acquisition,
were recorded at estimated fair value and were generally delinquent in payments, but, in accordance
with GAAP, the Company continues to accrue interest income on such loans based on the estimated
expected cash flows associated with the loans. The carrying amount of such loans was $753 million
at June 30, 2011, or approximately 1.3% of total loans. Of that amount, $672 million was related
to the Wilmington Trust acquisition.
In an effort to assist borrowers, the Company has modified the terms of select loans secured
by residential real estate, largely from the Companys portfolio of Alt-A loans. Included in loans
outstanding at June 30, 2011 were $303 million of modified loans, of which $129 million were
classified as nonaccrual. The remaining modified loans have demonstrated payment capability
consistent with the modified terms and, accordingly, were classified as renegotiated loans and were
accruing interest at June 30, 2011. Loan modifications included such actions as the extension of
loan maturity dates (generally from thirty to forty years) and the lowering of interest rates and
monthly payments. The objective of the modifications was to increase loan repayments by customers
and thereby reduce net charge-offs. In accordance with GAAP, the modified loans are included in
impaired loans for purposes of determining the allowance for credit losses. Modified residential
real estate loans totaled $307 million as of June 30, 2010, of which $118 million were in nonaccrual status, and $308 million as of December 31, 2010, of which $117 million were in
nonaccrual status.
- 70 -
Residential real estate loans modified under specified loss mitigation programs prescribed by
government guarantors have not been included in renegotiated loans because the loan guarantee
remains in full force and, accordingly, M&T has not granted a concession with respect to the
ultimate collection of the original loan balance. Such loans aggregated $129 million and $106
million at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively.
Commercial loans and leases classified as nonaccrual totaled $164 million at June 30, 2011,
$248 million at June 30, 2010, $187 million at December 31, 2010 and $173 million at March 31,
2011. The decline in such loans since June 30, 2010 reflects payments/payoffs, including a fourth
quarter 2010 payoff of a $36 million relationship with a borrower in the commercial real estate
sector.
Nonaccrual commercial real estate loans totaled $708 million at June 30, 2011, $471 million at
June 30, 2010, $682 million at December 31, 2010 and $658 million at March 31, 2011. Reflected in
such nonaccrual loans were loans to residential homebuilders and developers totaling $359 million,
$265 million, $346 million and $320 million at June 30, 2011, June 30, 2010, December 31, 2010 and
March 31, 2011, respectively. The higher levels of commercial real estate loans classified as
nonaccrual at June 30, 2011, March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010 as compared with June 30, 2010
were largely due to the increases in such loans to residential real estate builders and developers,
which reflect loans of $42 million at June 30, 2011 obtained in the Wilmington Trust acquisition.
Also contributing to the increases from June 30, 2010 was the fourth quarter 2010 addition to
nonaccrual loans of $66 million of commercial construction loans to an owner/operator of retirement
and assisted living facilities. Information about the location of
nonaccrual and charged-off
loans to residential real estate builders and developers as of and for the three-month period ended
June 30, 2011 is presented in the accompanying table.
RESIDENTIAL BUILDER AND DEVELOPER LOANS, NET OF UNEARNED DISCOUNT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter ended |
|
|
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net charge-offs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonaccrual |
|
|
(recoveries) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annualized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
percent of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
average |
|
|
|
Outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
outstanding |
|
|
|
balances(a) |
|
|
Balances |
|
|
balances |
|
|
Balances |
|
|
balances |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
New York |
|
$ |
261,283 |
|
|
$ |
27,117 |
|
|
|
10.38 |
% |
|
$ |
766 |
|
|
|
1.19 |
% |
Pennsylvania |
|
|
363,097 |
|
|
|
90,529 |
|
|
|
24.93 |
|
|
|
231 |
|
|
|
.30 |
|
Mid-Atlantic |
|
|
1,182,063 |
|
|
|
225,229 |
|
|
|
19.05 |
|
|
|
3,750 |
|
|
|
1.67 |
|
Other |
|
|
206,665 |
|
|
|
36,245 |
|
|
|
17.54 |
|
|
|
979 |
|
|
|
1.92 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
2,013,108 |
|
|
$ |
379,120 |
|
|
|
18.83 |
% |
|
$ |
5,726 |
|
|
|
1.37 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Includes approximately $172 million of loans not secured by real estate, of which
approximately $20 million are in nonaccrual status. |
Residential real estate loans classified as nonaccrual were $295 million at June 30, 2011,
$285 million at June 30, 2010, $279 million at December 31, 2010 and $289 million at March 31,
2011. Depressed real estate values and high levels of delinquencies have contributed to higher
than historical levels of residential real estate loans classified as nonaccrual and to the elevated level of charge-offs, largely in the Companys Alt-A portfolio. Included in residential
real estate loans classified as nonaccrual were Alt-A loans, totaling $107 million, $112 million,
$106 million and $111 million at June 30, 2011, June 30, 2010, December 31, 2010 and March 31,
2011, respectively. Residential real estate loans past due
- 71 -
90 days or more and accruing interest
totaled $199 million at June 30, 2011, compared with $172 million a year earlier, and $192 million
and $195 million at December 31, 2010 and March 31, 2011, respectively. A substantial portion of
such amounts related to guaranteed loans repurchased from government-related entities. Information
about the location of nonaccrual and charged-off residential real estate loans as of and for the
quarter ended June 30, 2011 is presented in the accompanying table.
Nonaccrual consumer loans totaled $92 million and $86 million at June 30, 2011 and 2010,
respectively, compared with $91 million at each of December 31, 2010 and March 31, 2011. As a
percentage of consumer loan balances outstanding, nonaccrual consumer loans were .75% at June 30,
2011, compared with .73% a year earlier, .79% at December 31, 2010 and .81% at March 31, 2011.
Included in nonaccrual consumer loans at June 30, 2011, June 30, 2010, December 31, 2010 and March
31, 2011 were indirect automobile loans of $27 million, $30 million, $32 million and $30 million,
respectively; recreational vehicle loans of $11 million, $13 million, $13 million and $13 million,
respectively; and outstanding balances of home equity loans and lines of credit, including second
lien Alt-A loans, of $50 million, $38 million, $43 million and $44 million, respectively. Consumer
loans delinquent 30-89 days at June 30, 2011 totaled $126 million, compared with $114 million a
year earlier, $120 million at December 31, 2010 and $96 million at March 31, 2011. Consumer loans
past due 90 days or more and accruing interest totaled $4 million at each of June 30, 2011, June
30, 2010, December 31, 2010 and March 31, 2011. Information about the location of nonaccrual and
charged-off home equity loans and lines of credit as of and for the quarter ended June 30, 2011 is
presented in the accompanying table.
Real estate and other foreclosed assets were $159 million at June 30, 2011, compared with $193
million at June 30, 2010, $220 million at December 31, 2010 and
$218 million at March 31, 2011. The decrease at the recent quarter-end as compared with the
other respective quarter-ends resulted from the sale during the recent quarter of a commercial real
estate property located in New York City with a carrying value of $99 million. The Companys
holding of residential real estate-related properties comprised 72% of foreclosed assets at June
30, 2011. Reflected in real estate and other foreclosed assets at June 30, 2011 were $57 million
of such assets obtained in the Wilmington Trust acquisition that were recorded at fair value on the
acquisition date. Proceeds from the sales of foreclosed assets were the most significant factor in
the increase in other net cash flows from investing activities during the six months ended June 30,
2011.
- 72 -
SELECTED RESIDENTIAL REAL ESTATE-RELATED LOAN DATA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter ended |
|
|
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net charge-offs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonaccrual |
|
|
(recoveries) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annualized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
percent of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
average |
|
|
|
Outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
outstanding |
|
|
|
balances |
|
|
Balances |
|
|
balances |
|
|
Balances |
|
|
balances |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgages: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New York |
|
$ |
2,612,474 |
|
|
$ |
51,984 |
|
|
|
1.99 |
% |
|
$ |
727 |
|
|
|
0.12 |
% |
Pennsylvania |
|
|
908,800 |
|
|
|
18,731 |
|
|
|
2.06 |
|
|
|
494 |
|
|
|
0.23 |
|
Mid-Atlantic |
|
|
1,573,116 |
|
|
|
45,769 |
|
|
|
2.91 |
|
|
|
1,137 |
|
|
|
0.34 |
|
Other |
|
|
1,249,354 |
|
|
|
63,090 |
|
|
|
5.05 |
|
|
|
2,973 |
|
|
|
1.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
6,343,744 |
|
|
$ |
179,574 |
|
|
|
2.83 |
% |
|
$ |
5,331 |
|
|
|
0.36 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential construction loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New York |
|
$ |
9,423 |
|
|
$ |
882 |
|
|
|
9.36 |
% |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
% |
Pennsylvania |
|
|
3,020 |
|
|
|
414 |
|
|
|
13.71 |
|
|
|
(31 |
) |
|
|
(3.87 |
) |
Mid-Atlantic |
|
|
15,689 |
|
|
|
2,982 |
|
|
|
19.01 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
0.48 |
|
Other |
|
|
28,117 |
|
|
|
3,619 |
|
|
|
12.87 |
|
|
|
394 |
|
|
|
5.24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
56,249 |
|
|
$ |
7,897 |
|
|
|
14.04 |
% |
|
$ |
383 |
|
|
|
2.59 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alt-A first mortgages: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New York |
|
$ |
87,536 |
|
|
$ |
17,095 |
|
|
|
19.53 |
% |
|
$ |
1,022 |
|
|
|
4.59 |
% |
Pennsylvania |
|
|
20,223 |
|
|
|
2,801 |
|
|
|
13.85 |
|
|
|
400 |
|
|
|
7.67 |
|
Mid-Atlantic |
|
|
105,862 |
|
|
|
17,718 |
|
|
|
16.74 |
|
|
|
1,718 |
|
|
|
6.38 |
|
Other |
|
|
357,307 |
|
|
|
69,827 |
|
|
|
19.54 |
|
|
|
4,985 |
|
|
|
5.47 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
570,928 |
|
|
$ |
107,441 |
|
|
|
18.82 |
% |
|
$ |
8,125 |
|
|
|
5.58 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alt-A junior lien: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New York |
|
$ |
2,858 |
|
|
$ |
288 |
|
|
|
10.08 |
% |
|
$ |
49 |
|
|
|
6.82 |
% |
Pennsylvania |
|
|
640 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
5.16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mid-Atlantic |
|
|
4,174 |
|
|
|
164 |
|
|
|
3.93 |
|
|
|
204 |
|
|
|
19.40 |
|
Other |
|
|
14,162 |
|
|
|
547 |
|
|
|
3.86 |
|
|
|
637 |
|
|
|
17.73 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
21,834 |
|
|
$ |
1,032 |
|
|
|
4.73 |
% |
|
$ |
890 |
|
|
|
16.09 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First lien home equity loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New York |
|
$ |
30,414 |
|
|
$ |
576 |
|
|
|
1.89 |
% |
|
$ |
45 |
|
|
|
0.58 |
% |
Pennsylvania |
|
|
170,328 |
|
|
|
2,979 |
|
|
|
1.75 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
0.08 |
|
Mid-Atlantic |
|
|
173,302 |
|
|
|
2,772 |
|
|
|
1.60 |
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
0.11 |
|
Other |
|
|
4,916 |
|
|
|
194 |
|
|
|
3.95 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
378,960 |
|
|
$ |
6,521 |
|
|
|
1.72 |
% |
|
$ |
123 |
|
|
|
0.13 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First lien home equity lines: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New York |
|
$ |
873,329 |
|
|
$ |
2,675 |
|
|
|
0.31 |
% |
|
$ |
74 |
|
|
|
0.03 |
% |
Pennsylvania |
|
|
593,468 |
|
|
|
1,084 |
|
|
|
0.18 |
|
|
|
(50 |
) |
|
|
(0.04 |
) |
Mid-Atlantic |
|
|
639,584 |
|
|
|
1,211 |
|
|
|
0.19 |
|
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
0.05 |
|
Other |
|
|
40,161 |
|
|
|
517 |
|
|
|
1.29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
2,146,542 |
|
|
$ |
5,487 |
|
|
|
0.26 |
% |
|
$ |
104 |
|
|
|
0.02 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Junior lien home equity
loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New York |
|
$ |
72,903 |
|
|
$ |
1,245 |
|
|
|
1.71 |
% |
|
$ |
(3 |
) |
|
|
(0.01 |
)% |
Pennsylvania |
|
|
84,364 |
|
|
|
2,386 |
|
|
|
2.83 |
|
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
0.33 |
|
Mid-Atlantic |
|
|
180,539 |
|
|
|
2,927 |
|
|
|
1.62 |
|
|
|
219 |
|
|
|
0.53 |
|
Other |
|
|
16,242 |
|
|
|
634 |
|
|
|
3.90 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
0.84 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
354,048 |
|
|
$ |
7,192 |
|
|
|
2.03 |
% |
|
$ |
320 |
|
|
|
0.38 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Junior lien home equity
lines: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New York |
|
$ |
1,629,613 |
|
|
$ |
17,907 |
|
|
|
1.10 |
% |
|
$ |
4,075 |
|
|
|
1.01 |
% |
Pennsylvania |
|
|
608,020 |
|
|
|
1,954 |
|
|
|
0.32 |
|
|
|
396 |
|
|
|
0.28 |
|
Mid-Atlantic |
|
|
1,594,795 |
|
|
|
6,612 |
|
|
|
0.41 |
|
|
|
1,372 |
|
|
|
0.36 |
|
Other |
|
|
98,710 |
|
|
|
3,236 |
|
|
|
3.28 |
|
|
|
273 |
|
|
|
1.27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
3,931,138 |
|
|
$ |
29,709 |
|
|
|
0.76 |
% |
|
$ |
6,116 |
|
|
|
0.64 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- 73 -
A comparative summary of nonperforming assets and certain past due loan data and credit
quality ratios as of the end of the periods indicated is presented in the accompanying table.
NONPERFORMING ASSET AND PAST DUE, RENEGOTIATED AND IMPAIRED LOAN DATA
Dollars in thousands
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 Quarters |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 Quarters |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second |
|
|
First |
|
|
Fourth |
|
|
Third |
|
|
Second |
|
Nonaccrual loans |
|
$ |
1,258,975 |
|
|
|
1,211,111 |
|
|
|
1,239,194 |
|
|
|
1,099,560 |
|
|
|
1,090,135 |
|
Real estate and other
foreclosed assets |
|
|
158,873 |
|
|
|
218,203 |
|
|
|
220,049 |
|
|
|
192,600 |
|
|
|
192,631 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total nonperforming assets |
|
$ |
1,417,848 |
|
|
|
1,429,314 |
|
|
|
1,459,243 |
|
|
|
1,292,160 |
|
|
|
1,282,766 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accruing loans past due
90 days or more(a) |
|
$ |
373,197 |
|
|
|
264,480 |
|
|
|
269,593 |
|
|
|
214,769 |
|
|
|
203,081 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Renegotiated loans |
|
$ |
234,726 |
|
|
|
241,190 |
|
|
|
233,342 |
|
|
|
233,671 |
|
|
|
228,847 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Government
guaranteed loans included in totals above: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonaccrual loans |
|
$ |
78,732 |
|
|
|
69,353 |
|
|
|
56,787 |
|
|
|
38,232 |
|
|
|
40,271 |
|
Accruing loans past
due 90 days or more |
|
|
207,135 |
|
|
|
214,505 |
|
|
|
214,111 |
|
|
|
194,223 |
|
|
|
187,682 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchased impaired loans(b): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding customer
balance |
|
$ |
1,473,237 |
|
|
|
206,253 |
|
|
|
219,477 |
|
|
|
113,964 |
|
|
|
130,808 |
|
Carrying amount |
|
|
752,978 |
|
|
|
88,589 |
|
|
|
97,019 |
|
|
|
52,728 |
|
|
|
61,524 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonaccrual loans
to total loans and leases,
net of unearned discount |
|
|
2.15 |
% |
|
|
2.32 |
% |
|
|
2.38 |
% |
|
|
2.16 |
% |
|
|
2.13 |
% |
Nonperforming assets
to total net loans and
leases and real estate
and other foreclosed assets |
|
|
2.42 |
% |
|
|
2.73 |
% |
|
|
2.79 |
% |
|
|
2.53 |
% |
|
|
2.50 |
% |
Accruing loans past due
90 days or more to total
loans and leases, net of
unearned discount |
|
|
.64 |
% |
|
|
.51 |
% |
|
|
.52 |
% |
|
|
.42 |
% |
|
|
.40 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Predominately residential mortgage loans. |
|
(b) |
|
Accruing loans that were impaired at acquisition date and recorded at fair value. |
Management determined the allowance for credit losses by performing ongoing evaluations of the
loan and lease portfolio, including such factors as the differing economic risks associated with
each loan category, the financial condition of specific borrowers, the economic environment in
which borrowers operate, the level of delinquent loans, the value of any collateral and, where
applicable, the existence of any guarantees or indemnifications. Management evaluated the impact
of changes in interest rates and overall economic conditions on the ability of borrowers to meet
repayment obligations when quantifying the Companys exposure to credit losses and the allowance for
such losses as of each reporting date. Factors also considered by management when performing its
assessment, in addition to general economic conditions and the other factors described above,
included, but were not limited to: (i) the impact of declining residential real estate values in
the Companys portfolio of loans to residential real estate builders and developers; (ii) the repayment performance associated with the Companys portfolio of Alt-A residential mortgage loans;
(iii) the concentrations of
- 74 -
commercial real estate loans in the Companys loan portfolio; (iv) the
amount of commercial and industrial loans to businesses in areas of New York State outside of the
New York City metropolitan area and in central Pennsylvania that have historically experienced less
economic growth and vitality than the vast majority of other regions of the country; and (v) the
size of the Companys portfolio of loans to individual consumers, which historically have
experienced higher net charge-offs as a percentage of loans outstanding than other loan types. The
level of the allowance is adjusted based on the results of managements analysis.
Management cautiously and conservatively evaluated the allowance
for credit losses as of June
30, 2011 in light of (i) residential real estate values and the level of delinquencies of
residential real estate loans; (ii) economic conditions in the markets served by the Company; (iii)
continuing weakness in industrial employment in upstate New York and central Pennsylvania; (iv) the
significant subjectivity involved in commercial real estate valuations for properties located in
areas with stagnant or low growth economies; and (v) the amount of loan growth experienced by the
Company. Considerable concerns exist about economic conditions in both national and international
markets; the level and volatility of energy prices; a weakened housing market; the troubled state
of financial and credit markets; Federal Reserve positioning of monetary policy; high levels of
unemployment; the impact of economic conditions on businesses operations and abilities to repay
loans; continued stagnant population growth in the upstate New York and central Pennsylvania
regions; and continued uncertainty about possible responses to state and local government budget
deficits. Although the U.S. economy experienced recession and weak economic conditions during
recent years, the impact of those conditions was not as pronounced on borrowers in the
traditionally slower growth or stagnant regions of upstate New York and central Pennsylvania.
Approximately one-half of the Companys loans are to customers in New York State and Pennsylvania.
Home prices in upstate New York and central Pennsylvania were relatively stable in recent years, in
contrast to sharper declines in values in many other regions of the country. Therefore, despite
the conditions, as previously described, the most severe credit issues experienced by the Company
have been centered around residential real estate, including loans to builders and developers of
residential real estate, in areas other than New York State and Pennsylvania. In response, the
Company has expanded its normal loan review process to conduct detailed reviews of all loans to
residential real estate builders and developers that exceeded $2.5 million. Those credit reviews
often resulted in commencement of intensified collection efforts, including instances of
foreclosure.
The Company utilizes a loan grading system which is applied to all commercial and commercial
real estate loans. Loan grades are utilized to differentiate risk within the portfolio and
consider the expectations of default for each loan. Commercial loans and commercial real estate
loans with a lower expectation of default are assigned one of ten possible pass loan grades and are generally ascribed lower loss factors when determining the
allowance for credit losses. Loans with an elevated level of credit risk are classified as criticized and are ascribed a higher loss factor when determining the allowance for credit losses. Criticized
loans may be classified as nonaccrual if the Company no longer expects to collect all amounts
according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement or the loan is delinquent 90 days or more.
On a quarterly basis, the Companys centralized loan review department reviews all criticized commercial and
commercial real estate loans greater than $1 million to determine the appropriateness of the
assigned loan grade, including whether the loan should be reported as accruing or nonaccruing. For criticized nonaccrual loans, additional
meetings are held with loan officers and their managers, workout specialists and senior management
to discuss each of the relationships. In analyzing criticized loans, borrower-specific
information is reviewed, including operating results, future cash flows, recent developments and
the
- 75 -
borrowers
outlook, and other pertinent data. The timing and extent of potential losses, considering collateral valuation and other factors, and the Companys potential courses of action
are reviewed. To the extent that these loans are collateral-dependent, they are evaluated based on
the fair value of the loans collateral as estimated at or near the financial statement date. As
the quality of a loan deteriorates to the point of classifying the loan as criticized, the
process of obtaining updated collateral valuation information is usually initiated, unless it is
not considered warranted given factors such as the relative size of the loan, the characteristics
of the collateral or the age of the last valuation. In those cases where current appraisals may
not yet be available, prior appraisals are utilized with adjustments, as deemed necessary, for
estimates of subsequent declines in value as determined by line of business and/or loan workout
personnel in the respective geographic regions. Those adjustments are reviewed and assessed for
reasonableness by the Companys loan review department. Accordingly, for real estate collateral
securing larger commercial and commercial real estate loans, estimated collateral values are based
on current appraisals and estimates of value. For non-real estate loans, collateral is assigned a
discounted estimated liquidation value and, depending on the nature of the collateral, is verified
through field exams or other procedures. In assessing collateral, real estate and non-real estate
values are reduced by an estimate of selling costs. With regard to residential real estate loans,
the Company expanded its collections and loan workout staff and further refined its loss
identification and estimation techniques by reference to loan performance and house price
depreciation data in specific areas of the country where collateral that was securing the Companys
residential real estate loans was located. For residential real estate-related loans, including
home equity loans and lines of credit, the excess of the loan balance over the net realizable value
of the property collateralizing the loan is charged-off when the loan becomes 150 days delinquent.
That charge-off is based on recent indications of value from external parties that are generally
obtained shortly after a loan becomes nonaccrual.
Factors that influence the Companys credit loss experience include overall economic
conditions affecting businesses and consumers generally, but also residential and commercial real
estate valuations, in particular, given the size of the real estate loan portfolios. Reflecting
the factors and conditions as described herein, the Company has experienced historically high
levels of nonaccrual loans and net charge-offs of real estate-related loans, including first and
second lien Alt-A mortgage loans and loans to builders and developers of residential real estate.
The Company has also experienced higher than historical levels of nonaccrual commercial real estate
loans since 2009. Commercial real estate valuations can be highly subjective, as
they are based upon many assumptions. Such valuations can be significantly affected over
relatively short periods of time by changes in business climate, economic conditions, interest
rates and, in many cases, the results of operations of businesses and other occupants of the real
property. Similarly, residential real estate valuations can be impacted by housing trends, the
availability of financing at reasonable interest rates, and general economic conditions affecting
consumers.
Loans acquired in connection with acquisition transactions subsequent to 2008 were recorded at
fair value with no carry-over of any previously recorded allowance for credit losses. Determining
the fair value of the acquired loans required estimating cash flows expected to be collected on the
loans and discounting those cash flows at then current interest rates. The excess of cash flows
expected at acquisition over the estimated fair value is being recognized as interest income over
the lives of the loans. The difference between contractually required payments at acquisition and
the cash flows expected to be collected at acquisition reflects estimated future credit losses and
other contractually required payments that the Company does not expect to collect. The Company
regularly evaluates the reasonableness of its cash flow projections. Any decreases to the expected
cash flows require
- 76 -
the Company to evaluate the need for an additional allowance for credit losses
and could lead to charge-offs of acquired loan balances. Any significant increases in expected
cash flows result in additional interest income to be recognized over the then-remaining lives of
the loans.
Management believes that the allowance for credit losses at June 30, 2011 appropriately
reflected credit losses inherent in the portfolio as of that date. The allowance for credit losses
was $908 million, or 1.55% of total loans and leases at June 30, 2011, compared with $895 million
or 1.75% a year earlier, $903 million or 1.74% at December 31, 2010 and $904 million or 1.73% at
March 31, 2011. The ratio of the allowance to total loans and leases reflects the impact of loans
obtained in acquisition transactions subsequent to 2008 that have been recorded at estimated fair
value based on estimated future cash flows expected to be received on those loans. Those cash
flows reflect the impact of expected defaults on customer repayment performance. Excluding the
effect of such loans, the allowance for credit losses related to the Companys legacy loans (that
is, total loans excluding loans acquired subsequent to 2008) expressed as a percentage of such
legacy loans was 1.80% at June 30, 2011, compared with 1.86% at June 30, 2010, 1.82% at December
31, 2010 and 1.81% at March 31, 2011. The level of the allowance reflects managements evaluation
of the loan and lease portfolio as described herein. Should the various credit factors considered
by management in establishing the allowance for credit losses change and should managements
assessment of losses inherent in the loan portfolio also change, the level of the allowance as a
percentage of loans could increase or decrease in future periods. The ratio of the allowance for
credit losses to nonaccrual loans was 72% at June 30, 2011, compared with 82% a year earlier, 73%
at December 31, 2010 and 75% at March 31, 2011. Given the Companys general position as a secured
lender and its practice of charging off loan balances when collection is deemed doubtful, that
ratio and changes in that ratio are generally not an indicative measure of the adequacy of the
Companys allowance for credit losses, nor does management rely upon that ratio in determining
the allowance. The level of the allowance reflects managements evaluation of
the loan and lease portfolio as of each respective date.
Other Income
Other income totaled $502 million in the second quarter of 2011, up 83% from $274 million in the
year-earlier quarter and 60% higher than $314 million in the first quarter of 2011. Reflected in
those amounts were net gains on investment securities (including other-than-temporary impairment losses) of $84 million in the
recent quarter and $23 million in the initial quarter of 2011, compared with net losses of $22
million in the second quarter of 2010. During the recent quarter, the Company sold investment
securities held in its available-for-sale portfolio having an amortized cost of approximately $1.21
billion, resulting in a gain of $111 million. The securities sold were predominantly residential
mortgage-backed securities guaranteed by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, collateralized debt
obligations and capital preferred securities. During the initial 2011 quarter, the Company sold
residential mortgage-backed securities guaranteed by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac held in its
available-for-sale portfolio having an amortized cost of $484 million, resulting in a gain of $39
million. Included in net securities gains and losses in each of the quarters were
other-than-temporary impairment charges of $27 million in the recent quarter, $22 million in the
second quarter of 2010 and $16 million in the first quarter of 2011. Those other-than-temporary
impairment charges were predominantly related to the Companys holdings of privately issued CMOs
and reflect the impact of lower real estate values and higher delinquencies on real estate loans
underlying those impaired securities. The impairment charges in the second quarter of 2010 also
reflected a $12 million write-down of AIB ADSs, which were obtained by M&T in 2003 as a result of an acquisition. Also reflected in noninterest income during the recent quarter was the $65 million
gain related to the
- 77 -
Wilmington Trust acquisition.
Excluding gains and losses on bank investment securities (including other-than-temporary
impairment losses) and the acquisition-related gain, other income aggregated $353 million in the
second quarter of 2011, compared with $296 million in the year-earlier quarter and $291 million in
the initial quarter of 2011. As compared with the second quarter of 2010, significantly higher
trust income during the recent quarter, predominantly due to the Wilmington Trust acquisition, and
increased letter of credit and other credit-related fees and gains on the sale of previously leased
equipment were partially offset by lower service charges on consumer deposit accounts. As compared
with the initial quarter of 2011, higher trust income due to the Wilmington Trust acquisition and
higher consumer service charges and other fee income contributed to the recent quarters
improvement. Wilmington Trust-related revenues in the recent quarter added $54 million to other
income, including $46 million to trust income and $4 million to deposit service charges.
Mortgage banking revenues were $42 million in the recently completed quarter, down 10% from
$47 million in the year-earlier quarter and 7% below $45 million in the first quarter of 2011.
Mortgage banking revenues are comprised of both residential and commercial mortgage banking
activities. The Companys involvement in commercial mortgage banking activities includes the
origination, sales and servicing of loans under the multifamily loan programs of Fannie Mae,
Freddie Mac and the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.
Residential mortgage banking revenues, consisting of realized gains from sales of residential
mortgage loans and loan servicing rights, unrealized gains and losses on residential mortgage loans
held for sale and related commitments, residential mortgage loan servicing fees, and other
residential mortgage loan-related fees and income, were $25 million in the second quarter of 2011,
compared with $36 million in the year-earlier period and $29 million in the initial 2011 quarter.
The decline in residential mortgage banking revenues in the recent quarter as compared with the
second quarter of 2010 was largely attributable to lower volumes of loans originated for sale. The
decrease in residential mortgage banking revenues in the recent quarter as compared with the first
quarter of 2011 reflects a $6 million rise in costs related to obligations to repurchase previously
sold loans.
New commitments to originate residential mortgage loans to be sold were approximately $742
million in the recent quarter, compared with $1.1 billion and $468 million in the second quarter of
2010 and the first quarter of 2011, respectively. Similarly, closed residential mortgage loans
originated for sale to other investors were approximately $702 million in the recent quarter,
compared with $1.0 billion and $371 million during the three-month periods ended June 30, 2010 and
March 31, 2011, respectively. Realized gains from sales of residential mortgage loans and loan
servicing rights (net of the impact of costs associated with obligations to repurchase mortgage
loans originated for sale) and recognized net unrealized gains and losses attributable to
residential mortgage loans held for sale, commitments to originate loans for sale and commitments
to sell loans totaled to a gain of $5 million in the recently completed quarter, compared with
gains of $15 million in the second quarter of 2010 and $9 million in the initial 2011 quarter.
The Company is contractually obligated to repurchase previously sold loans that do not
ultimately meet investor sale criteria related to underwriting procedures or loan documentation.
When required to do so, the Company may reimburse loan purchasers for losses incurred or may
repurchase certain loans. Since early 2007 when the Company recognized a $6 million charge related
to declines in market values of previously sold residential
- 78 -
real estate loans that the Company
could have been required to repurchase, the Company has regularly reduced residential mortgage
banking revenues by an estimate for losses related to its obligations to loan purchasers. The
amount of those charges varies based on the volume of loans sold, the level of reimbursement
requests received from loan purchasers and estimates of losses that may be associated with
previously sold loans. Residential mortgage banking revenues during the three-month periods ended
June 30, 2011, June 30, 2010 and March 31, 2011 were reduced by $9 million, $6 million and $3
million, respectively, related to actual and anticipated settlements of repurchase obligations. |
Late in the third quarter of 2010, the Company began to originate certain residential real
estate loans to be held in its loan portfolio, rather than continuing to sell such loans. During
the fourth quarter of 2010 and the first quarter of 2011, the Company added approximately $700
million of loans to its portfolio of residential real estate loans. In general, the loans
conformed to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac underwriting guidelines. Retaining those residential real
estate loans offset the impact of the declining investment securities portfolio resulting from
maturities and paydowns of residential mortgage-backed securities while providing high quality
assets earning a reasonable yield. From March through June 2011, the Company resumed originating
for sale the majority of new residential real estate loans. However, beginning in July 2011, the
Company has again begun to originate the majority of residential real estate loans to be held in
its loan portfolio.
Loans held for sale that are secured by residential real estate aggregated $286 million at
June 30, 2011, $450 million at June 30, 2010 and $341 million at December 31, 2010. Commitments to
sell residential mortgage loans and commitments to originate residential mortgage loans for sale at
pre-determined rates were $594 million and $483 million, respectively, at June 30, 2011, $833
million and $684 million, respectively, at June 30, 2010, and $458 million and $162 million,
respectively, at December 31, 2010. Net unrealized gains on residential mortgage loans held for
sale, commitments to sell loans, and commitments to originate loans for sale were $12 million and
$19 million at June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, and $11 million at December 31, 2010. Changes
in such net unrealized gains are recorded in mortgage banking revenues and resulted in net
increases in revenues of $2 million in the recent quarter and $5 million in the second quarter of
2010, compared with net decreases in revenues of $237 thousand in the initial 2011 quarter.
Revenues from servicing residential mortgage loans for others were $19 million in the recent
quarter, compared with $20 million in each of the three-month periods ended June 30, 2010 and March
31, 2011. Included in such servicing revenues were amounts related to purchased servicing rights
associated with small balance commercial mortgage loans, which totaled $6 million in each of the
first two quarters of 2011, compared with $7 million in the second quarter of 2010. Residential
mortgage loans serviced for others totaled $21.6 billion at June 30, 2011, compared with $21.4
billion at each of June 30, 2010 and March 31, 2011, and $21.1 billion at December 31, 2010,
including the small balance commercial mortgage loans noted above of approximately $4.8 billion at
June 30, 2011, $5.6 billion at June 30, 2010, $5.1 billion at March 31, 2011 and $5.2 billion at
December 31, 2010. Capitalized residential mortgage servicing assets, net of any applicable
valuation allowance for impairment, aggregated $111 million at June 30, 2011, compared with $124
million a year earlier, $112 million at March 31, 2011 and $118 million at December 31, 2010. The
valuation allowance for possible impairment of residential mortgage servicing assets totaled $2 million at
June 30, 2010. There was no valuation allowance at June 30, 2011, March 31, 2011 or
December 31, 2010. Included in capitalized residential mortgage servicing assets were $21 million
at June 30, 2011, $33 million at June 30, 2010, $23 million at March 31, 2011
and $26 million at
December 31, 2010 of
- 79 -
purchased servicing rights associated with the small balance commercial
mortgage loans noted above. Servicing rights for the small balance commercial mortgage loans were
purchased from Bayview Lending Group, LLC (BLG) or its affiliates. In addition, at June 30,
2011, capitalized servicing rights included $7 million for servicing rights for $3.4 billion of
residential real estate loans that were purchased from affiliates of BLG. Additional information
about the Companys relationship with BLG and its affiliates is provided in note 15 of Notes to
Financial Statements.
Commercial mortgage banking revenues were $17 million in the second quarter of 2011, up from
$11 million in the year-earlier period and $16 million in the first quarter of 2011. Included in
such amounts were revenues from loan origination and sales activities of $12 million in the recent
quarter, compared with $7 million in the second quarter of 2010 and $11 million in the initial 2011
quarter. Commercial mortgage loan servicing revenues were $5 million in each of the first and
second quarters of 2011 and $4 million in the second quarter of 2010. Capitalized commercial
mortgage servicing assets totaled $48 million and $37 million at June 30, 2011 and 2010,
respectively, and $43 million at December 31, 2010. Commercial mortgage loans serviced for other
investors totaled $8.5 billion, $7.6 billion and $8.1 billion at June 30, 2011, June 30, 2010 and
December 31, 2010, respectively, and included $1.7 billion, $1.5 billion and $1.6 billion,
respectively, of loan balances for which investors had recourse to the Company if such balances are
ultimately uncollectible. Commitments to sell commercial mortgage loans and commitments to
originate commercial mortgage loans for sale were $309 million and $181 million, respectively, at
June 30, 2011, $146 million and $121 million, respectively, at June 30, 2010 and $276 million and
$73 million, respectively, at December 31, 2010. Commercial mortgage loans held for sale at June
30, 2011 and 2010 were $128 million and $25 million, respectively, and $204 million at December 31,
2010.
Service charges on deposit accounts totaled $120 million in the second quarter of 2011,
compared with $129 million in the similar 2010 quarter and $110 million in the first quarter of
2011. The decline in such fees in the recent quarter as compared with the second quarter of 2010
was due predominantly to the new regulations that went into effect during the third quarter of
2010. The Federal Reserve and other bank regulators have adopted regulations requiring expanded
disclosure of overdraft and other fees assessed to consumers and have issued guidance that requires
consumers to elect to be subject to fees for certain deposit account transactions. The increase
from the immediately preceding quarter related to consumer deposit
service charges and reflects traditional first quarter seasonal declines in customer
transaction volumes and the impact of the Wilmington Trust acquisition, which added $4 million to
the recent quarters total. New regulations have been finalized as part of the Dodd-Frank Act
related to limiting debit card-interchange fees that financial institutions are able to assess.
Those new regulations are effective October 1, 2011. The Company estimates that the implementation
of those regulations will reduce total service charges on deposit accounts in the fourth quarter of
2011 by $15 million to $20 million.
Trust income totaled $76 million in the second quarter of 2011, up significantly from $30
million and $29 million in the corresponding 2010 quarter and the first quarter of 2011,
respectively. The Wilmington Trust acquisition contributed $46 million to the recent quarters
trust income. That acquisition brought with it two significant sources of trust income. The
Corporate Client Services (CCS) business provides a variety of trustee, agency, investment
management and administrative services for corporations and institutions, investment bankers,
corporate tax, finance and legal executives, and other institutional clients who: (i) use capital
markets financing structures; (ii) use independent trustees to hold retirement plan and other assets; and (iii) need investment and cash management services. Many CCS clients are multinational
corporations and institutions. The Wealth
- 80 -
Advisory Services (WAS) business helps high net worth
clients grow their wealth, protect it, and transfer it to their heirs. Services are targeted for
clients with liquid assets of $10 million or more. A comprehensive array of wealth management
services are offered, including asset management, fiduciary services and family office services.
Trust income in the recent quarter reflects $29 million of revenues from the Companys
non-Wilmington Trust-related trust activities, $26 million from acquired CCS activities and $18
million from acquired WAS activities. Total trust assets, which include assets under management
and assets under administration, aggregated $310.2 billion at June 30, 2011, compared with $113.4
billion at December 31, 2010. Trust assets under management were $55.4 billion and $13.2 billion
at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively. The acquisition of Wilmington Trust added
trust assets under management and assets under administration aggregating $42.2 billion and $154.1
billion, respectively, at June 30, 2011. In addition, trust assets under the management of
affiliates (obtained in the Wilmington Trust transaction) totaled $16.7 billion at June 30, 2011.
Brokerage services income, which includes revenues from the sale of mutual funds and annuities
and securities brokerage fees, totaled $15 million, $13 million and $14 million in the three-month
periods ended June 30, 2011, June 30, 2010 and March 31, 2011, respectively. Trading account and
foreign exchange activity resulted in gains of $7 million and $4 million during the second quarters
of 2011 and 2010, respectively, and $8 million in the initial 2011 quarter. Contributing to the
higher revenues in the recent quarter as compared with the second quarter of 2010 were net
increases in the market values of trading account assets held in conjunction with deferred
compensation arrangements. Also contributing to that increase were revenues from interest rate and
foreign exchange contracts. The Company enters into interest rate and foreign exchange contracts
with customers who need such services and concomitantly enters into offsetting trading positions
with third parties to minimize the risks involved with these types of transactions. Information
about the notional amount of interest rate, foreign exchange and other contracts entered into by
the Company for trading account purposes is included in note 10 of Notes to Financial Statements
and herein under the heading Taxable-equivalent Net Interest Income. Trading account revenues
related to interest rate and foreign exchange contracts totaled $4 million in the two most recent
quarters, compared with $3 million in the second quarter of 2010.
Including the impact of other-than-temporary impairment losses, during the second quarter of
2011 the Company recognized net gains on investment securities of $84 million, compared with net gains of $23 million in the initial quarter of
2011 and net losses of $22 million in the second quarter of 2010. During the recent quarter, the
Company realized gains of $111 million from the sale of investment securities available for sale,
predominantly residential mortgage-backed securities guaranteed by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac,
collateralized debt obligations and capital preferred securities, having an amortized cost of
approximately $1.21 billion. During the initial 2011 quarter, $39 million of gains were realized
from the sale of residential mortgage-backed securities guaranteed by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac
held in the available-for-sale portfolio. Such securities had an amortized cost of approximately
$484 million. Other-than-temporary impairment charges of $27 million, $22 million and $16 million
were recorded in the quarters ended June 30, 2011, June 30, 2010 and March 31, 2011, respectively.
The impairment charges were predominantly related to certain privately issued CMOs backed by
residential real estate loans. Also reflected in the impairment charges in the second quarter of
2010 were $12 million related to AIB ADSs that had been obtained in an acquisition of a subsidiary of AIB in
2003. Each reporting period, the Company reviews its investment securities for
other-than-temporary impairment. For equity securities, such as the Companys holding of AIB ADSs,
the Company considers various factors to determine if the decline in value is other than temporary,
including the duration and extent of the decline in value, the factors
- 81 -
contributing to the decline
in fair value, including the financial condition of the issuer as well as the condition of the
industry in which it operates, and the prospects for a recovery in fair value of the equity
security. For debt securities, the Company analyzes the creditworthiness of the issuer or reviews
the credit performance of the underlying collateral supporting the bond. For debt securities backed
by pools of loans, such as privately issued mortgage-backed securities, the Company estimates the
cash flows of the underlying loan collateral using forward-looking assumptions of default rates,
loss severities and prepayment speeds. Estimated collateral cash flows are then utilized to
estimate bond-specific cash flows to determine the ultimate collectibility of the bond. If the
present value of the cash flows indicates that the Company should not expect to recover the entire
amortized cost basis of a bond or if the Company intends to sell the bond or it more likely than
not will be required to sell the bond before recovery of its amortized cost basis, an
other-than-temporary impairment loss is recognized. If an other-than-temporary impairment loss is
deemed to have occurred, the investment securitys cost basis is adjusted, as appropriate for the
circumstances. Additional information about other-than-temporary impairment losses is included
herein under the heading Capital.
M&Ts share of the operating results of BLG in the recent quarter was a loss of $5 million,
compared with losses of $6 million and $7 million in the second quarter of 2010 and the initial
2011 quarter, respectively. The operating losses of BLG in the respective quarters resulted from
disruptions in the residential and commercial real estate markets and reflected provisions for losses
associated with securitized loans and other loans held by BLG and loan servicing and other
administrative costs. Despite the credit and liquidity disruptions that began in 2007, BLG had
been successfully securitizing and selling significant volumes of small-balance commercial real
estate loans until the first quarter of 2008. However, in response to the illiquidity in the
marketplace since that time, BLG has ceased its originations activities. As a result of past
securitization activities, BLG is still entitled to cash flows from mortgage assets that it owns or
that are owned by its affiliates and is also entitled to receive distributions from affiliates that
provide asset management and other services. Accordingly, the Company believes that BLG is capable
of realizing positive cash flows that could be available for distribution to its owners, including
M&T, despite a lack of positive GAAP-earnings. In assessing M&Ts investment in BLG for
other-than-temporary impairment at June 30, 2011, the Company projected no further commercial
mortgage origination and securitization activities by BLG. BLG, however, is entitled to receive, if and when made, cash distributions from affiliates, a portion of
which is contractually required to be distributed to M&T. In large part, it is such right that provided the support
for M&Ts assesment that its investment in BLG was not other-than-temporarily impaired at June 30, 2011. Specifically,
cash flows related to mortgage assets held by BLG and its affiliates were estimated using various assumptions on future default and loss severities to arrive at an expected amount of cash flows that could be available for distribution.
As of June 30, 2011, the weighted-average assumption of
projected default percentage on the underlying mortgage loan collateral supporting those mortgage
assets was 31% and the weighted-average loss severity assumption was 71%. With respect to projected value expected to be generated by the asset management and servicing operations of BLGs
affiliates, M&T developed estimates from company-provided forecasts of financial results and through discussions with their senior management pertaining to longer-term
projections of growth in assets under management and asset servicing portfolios. M&T considered
different scenarios of projected cash flows that could be generated by the asset management and
servicing operations of BLGs affiliates. M&T then discounted the various projections using discount rates that ranged from 8% to 17%. M&Ts analysis at June 30, 2011 estimated that the value attributed to BLG
and its relationship with its affiliates that inures to the benefit of M&T exceeded the carrying value of
M&Ts investment in BLG by 6%. Upon
evaluation of those results, management concluded that
- 82 -
M&Ts investment in BLG was not
other-than-temporarily impaired at June 30, 2011. Nevertheless, such analysis was dependent on the current and forecasted asset management, loan servicing and
other fee generating activities of BLGs affiliates and the realizability of mortgage assets held by BLG and affiliates. Although management believes its estimates are reasonable, should sufficient value not be generated that contractually
inures
to the benefit of M&T, an other-than-temporary impairment charge may be required in a future period for some portion of the $206 million book
value of its investment in BLG. Information about the Companys relationship with BLG and
its affiliates is included in note 15 of Notes to Financial Statements.
Other revenues from operations totaled $163 million in the recent quarter, compared with $79
million in the second quarter of 2010 and $91 million in the first quarter of 2011. Reflected in
such revenues in the recent quarter was the $65 million gain on the Wilmington Trust acquisition.
Also contributing to the rise in other revenues in the recent quarter as compared with the
year-earlier period and the first quarter of 2011 were higher letter of credit and other
credit-related fees and gains from the sale of previously leased equipment. Included in other
revenues from operations were the following significant components. Letter of credit and other
credit-related fees totaled $34 million in the second quarter of 2011, $26 million in the second
quarter of 2010 and $33 million in the first quarter of 2011. Tax-exempt income from bank owned
life insurance, which includes increases in the cash surrender value of life insurance policies and
benefits received, totaled $12 million in the second quarter of 2011, $14 million in the
year-earlier quarter and $13 million in the first quarter of 2011. Revenues from merchant discount
and credit card fees were $14 million, $12 million and $13 million in the three-month periods ended
June 30, 2011, June 30, 2010 and March 31, 2011, respectively. Insurance-related sales commissions
and other revenues totaled $9 million in each of the second quarters of 2011 and 2010, compared
with $12 million in the initial 2011 quarter. No other revenue source contributed more than $5
million to other revenues from operations in any of the quarterly periods discussed herein.
Other income rose 54% to $816 million in the first six months of 2011 from $531 million in the
first half of 2010. Reflected in other income were net gains and losses on bank investment
securities (including the impact of other-than-temporary impairment losses), which totaled to gains
of $108 million in 2011, compared with losses of $49 million in 2010. Also reflected in other
income in the first half of 2011 was the $65 million gain realized on the Wilmington Trust
acquisition. Excluding gains and losses from bank investment securities (including the impact of
other-than-temporary impairment losses) and the merger-related gain, other income aggregated $644
million and $580 million for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
That improvement was attributable to increases in trust income, the result of the Wilmington Trust
acquisition, letter of credit and other credit-related fees and gains from the sale of previously
leased equipment, partially offset by declines in service charges on deposit accounts.
Mortgage banking revenues were $87 million for the six-month period ended June 30, 2011,
compared with $89 million in the year-earlier period. Residential mortgage banking revenues declined to $55 million in the first half of 2011 from
$65 million in the first six months of 2010. New commitments to originate residential mortgage
loans to be sold were $1.2 billion and $2.1 billion during the first six months of 2011 and 2010,
respectively. Closed residential mortgage loans originated for sale to other investors during the
first six months of 2011 totaled $1.1 billion, compared with $2.0 billion in the similar 2010
period. Realized gains from sales of residential mortgage loans and loan servicing rights (net of
the impact of costs associated with obligations to repurchase mortgage loans originated for
sale)
and recognized unrealized gains and losses on residential mortgage
- 83 -
loans held for sale, commitments
to originate loans for sale and commitments to sell loans totaled to gains of $14 million and $23
million during the first six months of 2011 and 2010, respectively. Lower origination activity was
the primary contributor to the decline in such revenues.
Revenues from servicing residential mortgage loans for others were $39 million and $40 million
for the first half of 2011 and 2010, respectively. Included in such amounts were revenues related
to purchased servicing rights associated with the previously noted small balance commercial
mortgage loans of $12 million and $14 million for the first six months of 2011 and 2010, respectively. Commercial mortgage banking revenues totaled $32 million and $23 million during the
six-month periods ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. That improvement reflected higher
origination volumes that totaled $869 million in the 2011 period, compared with $618 million in the
first half of 2010.
Service charges on deposit accounts totaled $229 million and $249 million during the six-month
periods ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. That decline resulted predominantly from the
new regulations that went into effect during the third quarter of 2010. Trust income rose 72% to
$105 million in the first half of 2011 from $61 million a year earlier, due to $46 million of
revenues associated with the Wilmington Trust acquisition. Brokerage services income rose 13% to
$29 million during the first six months of 2011 from $26 million in the similar 2010 period.
Trading account and foreign exchange activity resulted in gains of $15 million and $8 million for
the six-month periods ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. M&Ts investment in BLG resulted
in losses of $12 million for each of the six month periods ended June 30, 2011 and 2010,
respectively. Investment securities gains and losses totaled to net gains of $108 million for the
first six months of 2011 and net losses of $49 million for the first half of 2010. Included in
those amounts were other-than-temporary impairment losses of $43 million and $49 million during the
first two quarters of 2011 and 2010, respectively. Other revenues from operations were $254
million in the first six months of 2011 and $159 million in the corresponding 2010 period.
Reflected in such revenues in 2011 was the $65 million gain realized on the acquisition of
Wilmington Trust. Also contributing to the improvement in other revenues from operations in 2011
as compared with 2010 were increases in gains from the sale of previously leased equipment of $6
million and revenues from letter of credit and from credit-related fees of $13 million. Included
in other revenues from operations during the six-month periods ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 were:
letter of credit and other credit-related fees of $67 million and $54 million, respectively; income
from bank owned life insurance of $25 million and $26 million, respectively; merchant discount and
credit card fees of $26 million and $22 million, respectively; and insurance-related sales
commissions and other revenues of $21 million and $20 million, respectively.
Other Expense
Other expense aggregated $577 million in the second quarter of 2011, 21% higher than $476 million
in the year-earlier quarter and 15% above $500 million in the first quarter of 2011. Included in those amounts are expenses considered by
management to be nonoperating in nature consisting of amortization of core deposit and other
intangible assets of $15 million in each of the second quarters of 2011 and 2010 and $12 million in
the initial quarter of 2011, and merger-related expenses of $37 million and $4 million in the
three-month periods ended June 30, 2011 and March 31, 2011, respectively. There were no
merger-related expenses in the second quarter of 2010. Exclusive of these nonoperating expenses,
noninterest operating expenses totaled $525 million in the recent quarter, compared with $461
million in the second quarter of 2010 and $483 million in the first quarter of 2011. The higher
level of such expenses in the recent quarter as compared with the
- 84 -
year-earlier quarter and the
initial 2011 quarter was due to the operations obtained in the Wilmington Trust acquisition. As
compared with the first quarter of 2011, partially offsetting the impact of the Wilmington Trust
acquisition were lower personnel costs in the recent quarter related to seasonally higher first
quarter stock-based compensation, payroll-related taxes and contributions for retirement savings
plan benefits associated with incentive compensation payments.
Other expense for the first six months of 2011 aggregated $1.08 billion, up 12% from $965
million in the corresponding period of 2010. Included in those amounts are expenses considered to
be nonoperating in nature consisting of amortization of core deposit and other intangible assets
of $27 million and $31 million in the six-month periods ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively,
and merger-related expenses of $41 million in the first half of 2011. Exclusive of these
nonoperating expenses, noninterest operating expenses for the first half of 2011 increased 8% to
$1.01 billion from $934 million in the first six months of 2010. The most significant factors for
that increase were costs associated with the acquired operations of Wilmington Trust. Table 2
provides a reconciliation of other expense to noninterest operating expense.
Salaries and employee benefits expense totaled $300 million in the recent quarter, compared
with $246 million in the second quarter of 2010 and $266 million in the initial 2011 quarter. As
noted in table 2, merger-related salaries and benefits costs were $15 million for the three months
and six months ended June 30, 2011. Those expenses consisted predominantly of severance expense
for Wilmington Trust employees. Exclusive of those merger-related expenses, salaries and employee
benefits expense in the recent quarter increased 16% as compared with the year earlier quarter.
That increase reflects the impact of operations associated with the May 16, 2011 acquisition of
Wilmington Trust. The increase in salaries and benefit expenses from the first to the second
quarter of 2011 reflected the impact of the operations associated with Wilmington Trust, partially
offset by decreased costs for stock-based compensation, payroll-related taxes and contributions for
retirement savings plan benefits associated with annual incentive compensation payments made in the
first quarter of each year. Salaries and employee benefits expense were $566 million and $510
million in the first six months of 2011 and 2010, respectively. Exclusive of merger-related
expenses, salaries and employee benefits expense rose 8% to $551 million in the first half of 2011
from $510 million in the corresponding 2010 period. That increase reflects the impact of
operations associated with the Wilmington Trust acquisition.
Stock-based compensation totaled $11 million, $12 million and $20 million during the quarters
ended June 30, 2011, June 30, 2010 and March 31, 2011, and $31 million and $32 million for the
six-month periods ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The number of full-time equivalent
employees was 15,357 at June 30, 2011, 13,022 at June 30, 2010, 12,802 at December 31, 2010 and
12,715 at March 31, 2011.
Excluding the nonoperating expense items described earlier from each
period, nonpersonnel operating expenses were $240 million in the recent quarter, compared with
$215 million in the second quarter of 2010 and $217 million in the first three months of 2011. On
the same basis, such expenses were $457 million and $424 million during the first six months of
2011 and 2010, respectively. The rise in nonpersonnel operating expenses in the recent quarter as
compared with the year-earlier quarter and the first quarter of 2011 and in the first half of 2011
as compared with the first six months of 2010 was due predominantly to the impact of the operations
associated with the Wilmington Trust acquisition. Also contributing to the higher level of
expenses in 2011 were increased costs for professional services, partially offset by a decline in
expenses related to foreclosed real estate properties.
- 85 -
The efficiency ratio, or noninterest operating expenses (as defined above) divided by the sum
of taxable-equivalent net interest income and noninterest income (exclusive of gains and losses
from bank investment securities and gains on merger transactions), measures the relationship of
noninterest operating expenses to revenues. The Companys efficiency ratio was 55.6% during the
recent quarter, compared with 53.1% during the year-earlier quarter and 55.8% in the first quarter
of 2011. The efficiency ratios for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 were 55.7%
and 54.4%, respectively. Noninterest operating expenses used in calculating the efficiency ratio
exclude the amortization of core deposit and other intangible assets and merger-related expenses
noted earlier. If charges for amortization of core deposit and other intangible assets were
included, the efficiency ratio for the three-month periods ended June 30, 2011, June 30, 2010 and
March 31, 2011 would have been 57.1%, 54.8% and 57.2%, respectively, and for the six-month periods
ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 would have been 57.2% and 56.3%, respectively.
Income Taxes
The provision for income taxes for the second quarter of 2011 was $126 million, compared with $91
million and $102 million in the year-earlier quarter and first quarter of 2011, respectively. The
effective tax rates were 28.0%, 32.5% and 33.2% for the quarters ended June 30, 2011, June 30, 2010
and March 31, 2011, respectively. For the first six months of 2011 and 2010, the provision for
income taxes totaled $228 million and $160 million, respectively, and the effective tax rates were
30.1% and 32.0%, respectively. The effective tax rate is affected by the level of income earned
that is exempt from tax relative to the overall level of pre-tax income, the level of income
allocated to the various state and local jurisdictions where the Company operates, because tax
rates differ among such jurisdictions, and the impact of any large but infrequently occurring
items. For example, although the merger-related expenses incurred during the recent quarter are
predominantly deductible for purposes of computing income tax expense, those charges increased the
effective tax rate because they lowered pre-tax income relative to the amounts of tax-exempt income
and other permanent differences that impact the effective tax rate. The recognition of the
non-taxable gain of $65 million on the Wilmington Trust acquisition in the recent quarter served to
lower the effective tax rate in the second quarter and first half of 2011. Income taxes in the
second quarter of 2011 also reflect the resolution in that period of previously uncertain tax
positions related to the Companys 2009 tax year that allowed the Company to reduce its accrual for
income taxes in the second quarter of 2011 by $7 million. Excluding the impact of net
merger-related gains and expenses and the credit to income tax expense noted above in the second
quarter of 2011, the Companys effective tax rates for the second quarter of 2011, the second
quarter 2010 and the first quarter of 2011 would have been 34.9%, 32.5% and 33.3%, respectively,
and for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 would have been 34.2% and 32.0%,
respectively.
The Companys effective tax rate in future periods will be affected by the results of
operations allocated to the various tax jurisdictions within which the Company operates, any change
in income tax laws or regulations within those jurisdictions, and interpretations of income tax
regulations that differ from the Companys interpretations by any of various tax authorities that
may examine tax returns filed by M&T or any of its subsidiaries.
- 86 -
Capital
Shareholders equity rose to $9.2 billion at June 30, 2011 from $8.1 billion a year earlier, each
representing 11.89% of total assets. At December 31, 2010, shareholders equity was $8.4 billion or
12.29% of total assets. Included in shareholders equity at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2010
was $751.5 million of Series A and Series C Fixed Rate Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock and
warrants to purchase M&T common stock issued as part of the U.S. Treasury Capital Purchase Program.
The Series A preferred stock totaling $600 million was issued by M&T in the fourth quarter of 2008
and the Series C preferred stock totaling $151.5 million was assumed by M&T in a 2009 acquisition.
During the second quarter of 2011, M&T redeemed $370 million of the Series A preferred stock. The
financial statement value of the remaining Series A and Series C preferred stock was $361 million
at June 30, 2011. The financial statement values of the Series A and Series C preferred stock had
been $709 million at June 30, 2010 and $714 million at December 31, 2010. The Series A and Series
C preferred stock pays quarterly cumulative cash dividends of 5% per annum for five years after the
initial 2008 issuance dates and 9% per annum thereafter. That preferred stock is redeemable at the
option of M&T, subject to regulatory approval. M&T also obtained another series of preferred stock
as part of a 2009 acquisition that was converted to $26.5 million of M&T Series B Mandatory
Convertible Non-Cumulative Preferred Stock, liquidation preference of $1,000 per share. The Series
B Preferred Stock paid quarterly dividends at a rate of 10% per annum. In accordance with their
terms, on April 1, 2011, the 26,500 shares of the Series B Preferred Stock converted into 433,144
shares of M&T common stock.
On May 31, 2011, M&T issued 50,000 shares of a new series of Perpetual 6.875% Non-Cumulative
Preferred Stock, Series D, par value $1.00 per share and liquidation preference of $10,000 per
share in order to supplement Tier 1 Capital. Holders of Series D preferred stock are entitled to
receive, only when, as and if declared by the Board of Directors, non-cumulative cash dividends at
an annual rate of 6.875%, payable semi-annually in arrears. The Series D preferred stock is
redeemable on or after June 15, 2016 in whole or in part at par plus any declared but unpaid
dividends. Notwithstanding the redemption provisions noted and subject to regulatory approval, M&T
may redeem all of the outstanding shares of the Series D preferred stock if a regulatory capital
treatment event takes place whereby the full liquidation value of the shares no longer qualifies as
Tier 1 Capital.
Common shareholders equity was $8.4 billion, or $66.71 per share, at June 30, 2011, compared
with $7.4 billion, or $61.77 per share, at June 30, 2010 and $7.6 billion, or $63.54 per share, at
December 31, 2010. Tangible equity per common share, which excludes goodwill and core deposit and
other intangible assets and applicable deferred tax balances, was $37.00 at the end of the second
quarter of 2011, compared with $31.15 a year earlier and $33.26 at December 31, 2010. The
Companys ratio of tangible common equity to tangible assets was 6.28% at June 30, 2011, compared
with 5.75% and 6.19% at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2010, respectively. Reconciliations of
total common shareholders equity and tangible common equity and total assets and tangible assets
as of each of those respective dates are presented in table 2.
Shareholders equity reflects accumulated other comprehensive income or loss, which includes
the net after-tax impact of unrealized gains or losses on investment securities classified as
available for sale, unrealized losses on held-to-maturity securities for which an
other-than-temporary impairment charge has been recognized, gains or losses associated with
interest rate swap agreements designated as cash flow hedges, foreign currency translation
adjustments, and adjustments to reflect the funded status of defined benefit pension and other
postretirement plans. Net unrealized losses on investment securities, net of applicable tax
effect, were $113 million, or $.90 per common share, at June 30, 2011, compared with similar losses
of $83 million,
- 87 -
or $.70 per common share, at June 30, 2010 and $85 million, or $.71 per common
share, at December 31, 2010. Such unrealized losses represent the difference, net of applicable
income tax effect, between the estimated fair value and amortized cost of investment securities
classified as available for sale, including the remaining unamortized unrealized losses on
investment securities that have been transferred to held-to-maturity classification, and the
remaining unrealized losses on held-to-maturity securities for which an other-than-temporary
impairment charge has been recognized. Information about unrealized gains and losses as of June
30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 is included in note 3 of Notes to Financial Statements.
Reflected in net unrealized losses at June 30, 2011 were pre tax-effect unrealized losses of
$248 million on available-for-sale investment securities with an amortized cost of $2.1 billion and
pre tax-effect unrealized gains of $112 million on securities with an amortized cost of $2.9
billion. The pre tax-effect unrealized losses reflect $211 million of losses on privately issued
mortgage-backed securities with an amortized cost of $1.2 billion and an estimated fair value of
$1.0 billion (considered Level 3 valuations) and $28 million of losses on trust preferred
securities issued by financial institutions and other debt securities having an amortized cost of
$181 million and an estimated fair value of $153 million (generally considered Level 2 valuations).
The Companys privately issued residential mortgage-backed securities classified as available
for sale are generally collateralized by prime and Alt-A residential mortgage loans as depicted in
the accompanying table. Information in the table is as of June 30, 2011. As with any accounting
estimate or other data, changes in fair values and investment ratings may occur at any time.
PRIVATELY ISSUED MORTGAGE-BACKED SECURITIES (a)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a percentage of carrying value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current |
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
gains |
|
|
AAA |
|
|
Investment |
|
|
Senior |
|
|
Credit |
|
|
payment |
|
Collateral type |
|
cost |
|
|
value |
|
|
(losses) |
|
|
rated |
|
|
grade |
|
|
tranche |
|
|
enhancement (b) |
|
|
status(c) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities
available for sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgage
loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prime Fixed |
|
$ |
73,680 |
|
|
|
78,232 |
|
|
|
4,552 |
|
|
|
45 |
% |
|
|
65 |
% |
|
|
99 |
% |
|
|
5 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
Prime Hybrid ARMs |
|
|
1,268,212 |
|
|
|
1,112,600 |
|
|
|
(155,612 |
) |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
95 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
85 |
|
Alt-A Hybrid ARMs |
|
|
151,671 |
|
|
|
101,827 |
|
|
|
(49,844 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
88 |
|
Other |
|
|
14,184 |
|
|
|
13,543 |
|
|
|
(641 |
) |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
74 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,507,747 |
|
|
|
1,306,202 |
|
|
|
(201,545 |
) |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
94 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
86 |
|
Commercial
mortgage loans |
|
|
21,095 |
|
|
|
17,233 |
|
|
|
(3,862 |
) |
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,528,842 |
|
|
|
1,323,435 |
|
|
|
(205,407 |
) |
|
|
4 |
% |
|
|
42 |
% |
|
|
94 |
% |
|
|
9 |
% |
|
|
86 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities
held to maturity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential and
commercial
mortgage loans |
|
|
292,034 |
|
|
|
189,776 |
|
|
|
(102,258 |
) |
|
|
38 |
% |
|
|
38 |
% |
|
|
87 |
% |
|
|
23 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,820,876 |
|
|
|
1,513,211 |
|
|
|
(307,665 |
) |
|
|
9 |
% |
|
|
42 |
% |
|
|
93 |
% |
|
|
12 |
% |
|
|
88 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
All information is as of June 30, 2011. |
(b) |
|
Weighted-average credit enhancement is calculated by dividing the remaining unpaid principal balance of bonds subordinate to the bonds owned by the Company plus any
overcollateralization remaining in the securitization structure by the remaining unpaid principal balance of all bonds in the securitization structure. |
|
(c) |
|
Represents percentage of amortized cost related to bonds for which the full amount of all contractually required principal and interest payments expected at acquisition continue to be received. |
- 88 -
Reflecting the credit stress associated with residential mortgage loans, trading activity for
privately issued mortgage-backed securities has been dramatically reduced. In estimating values for such securities, the Company was significantly restricted in the level of market observable
assumptions used in the valuation of its privately issued mortgage-backed securities portfolio.
Because of the reduced activity and lack of observable valuation inputs, the Company considers the
estimated fair value associated with its holdings of privately issued mortgage-backed securities to
be Level 3 valuations. To assist in the determination of fair value for its privately issued
mortgage-backed securities, the Company engaged two independent pricing sources at June 30, 2011
and December 31, 2010. GAAP provides guidance for estimating fair value when the volume and level
of trading activity for an asset or liability have significantly decreased. In consideration of
that guidance, the Company performed internal modeling to estimate the cash flows and fair value of
privately issued residential mortgage-backed securities with an amortized cost basis of $1.4
billion at June 30, 2011 and $1.5 billion at December 31, 2010. The Companys internal modeling
techniques included discounting estimated bond-specific cash flows using assumptions about cash
flows associated with loans underlying each of the bonds. In estimating those cash flows, the
Company used conservative assumptions as to future delinquency, default and loss rates in order to
mitigate exposure that might be attributable to the risk that actual future credit losses could
exceed assumed credit losses. Differences between internal model valuations and external pricing
indications were generally considered to be reflective of the lack of liquidity in the market for
privately issued mortgage-backed securities. To determine the most representative fair value for
those bonds under current market conditions, the Company computed values based on judgmentally
applied weightings of the internal model valuations and the indications obtained from the average
of the two independent pricing sources. Weightings applied to internal model valuations were
generally dependent on bond structure and collateral type, with prices for bonds in non-senior
tranches generally receiving lower weightings on the internal model results and greater weightings
of the valuation data provided by the independent pricing sources. The average weight placed on internal model
valuations at June 30, 2011 was 34%, compared with a 66% weighting on valuations provided by the independent
sources. Generally, the range of weights placed on internal valuations was between 0% and 40%.
Further information concerning the Companys valuations of privately issued mortgage-backed
securities can be found in note 12 of Notes to Financial Statements.
During the quarter ended June 30, 2011 the Company recognized $27 million (pre-tax) of
other-than-temporary impairment losses related to privately issued mortgage-backed
securities with an amortized cost basis (before impairment charge) of $244 million. Approximately $2 million of such losses related to
mortgage-backed securities in the Companys held-to-maturity portfolio. In assessing impairment
losses for debt securities, the Company performed internal modeling to estimate bond-specific cash
flows, which considered the placement of the bond in the overall securitization structure and the
remaining levels of subordination.
For privately issued residential mortgage-backed securities in the Companys
available-for-sale portfolio, the model utilized assumptions about the underlying performance of
the mortgage loan collateral considering recent collateral performance and future assumptions
regarding default and loss
severity. At June 30, 2011, projected model default percentages on the
underlying mortgage loan collateral ranged from 1% to 45% and loss severities ranged from 30% to
70%. For bonds in which the Company has recognized an other-than-temporary impairment charge, the
weighted-average percentage of default collateral was 24% and the weighted-average loss severity
was 52%. For bonds without other-than-temporary impairment losses, the weighted-average default
percentage and loss severity were 11% and 42%, respectively. Underlying mortgage loan collateral
cash flows, after considering the impact of estimated credit losses, were distributed by the model
to the various securities within the securitization structure to determine the timing and
- 89 -
extent of
losses at the bond-level, if any. Despite continuing high levels of delinquencies and losses in
the underlying residential mortgage loan collateral, given credit enhancements resulting from the
structures of individual bonds, the Company has concluded that as of June 30, 2011 its remaining
privately issued mortgage-backed securities were not other-than-temporarily impaired. Nevertheless,
given recent market conditions, it is possible that adverse changes in repayment performance and
fair value could occur in the remainder of 2011 and later years that could impact the Companys
conclusions. Management has modeled cash flows from privately issued mortgage-backed securities
under various scenarios and has concluded that even if home price depreciation and current
delinquency trends persist for an extended period of time, the Companys principal losses on its
privately issued mortgage-backed securities would be substantially less than their current fair
valuation losses.
During the second quarter of 2011, the Company recognized a $2 million (pre-tax)
other-than-temporary impairment charge related to CMOs in the held-to-maturity portfolio having an
amortized cost (before impairment charge) of $2 million. Similar to its evaluation of
available-for-sale privately issued mortgage-backed securities, the Company assessed impairment
losses on those CMOs by performing internal modeling to estimate bond-specific cash flows, which
considered the placement of the bond in the overall securitization structure and the remaining
subordination levels. In total, at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the Company had in its
held-to-maturity portfolio CMOs with an amortized cost basis of $292 million and $313 million
(after impairment charges), respectively, and a fair value of $190 million and $198 million,
respectively.
At June 30, 2011, the Company also had net pre-tax unrealized losses of $29 million on $191
million of trust preferred securities issued by financial institutions, securities backed by trust
preferred securities issued by financial institutions and other entities, and other debt securities
(reflecting $1 million of unrealized losses on $10 million of securities using a Level 3 valuation).
After evaluating the expected repayment performance of financial institutions where trust
preferred securities were held directly by the Company or were within the CDOs backed by trust
preferred securities obtained in acquisitions, the Company did not recognize any
other-than-temporary impairment losses related to those securities during the quarter ended June
30, 2011.
Information comparing the amortized cost and fair value of investment
securities is included in note 3 of Notes to Financial Statements.
As of June 30, 2011, based on a review of each of the remaining securities in the investment
securities portfolio, the Company concluded that the declines in the values of those securities
were temporary and that any additional other-than-temporary impairment charges were not
appropriate. As of that date, the Company did not intend to sell nor is it anticipated that it
would be required to sell any of its impaired securities, that is, where fair value is less than
the cost basis of the security. The Company intends to closely monitor the performance of the
privately issued mortgage-backed securities and other securities because changes in their
underlying credit performance or other events could cause the cost basis of those securities to
become other-than-temporarily impaired. However, because the unrealized losses on
available-for-sale investment securities have generally already been reflected in the financial
statement values for investment securities and
shareholders equity, any recognition of an other-than-temporary decline in value of those investment securities would not have a material
effect on the Companys consolidated financial condition. Any additional other-than-temporary
impairment charge related to held-to-maturity securities could result in reductions in the
financial statement values for investment securities and shareholders equity. Additional
information concerning fair value measurements and the Companys approach to the classification of
such
- 90 -
measurements is included in note 12 of Notes to Financial Statements.
Adjustments to reflect the funded status of defined benefit pension and other postretirement
plans, net of applicable tax effect, reduced accumulated other comprehensive income by $117 million
or $.93 per common share, at June 30, 2011, $115 million, or $.96 per common share, at June 30,
2010 and $121 million or $1.01 per common share, at December 31, 2010.
Cash dividends declared on M&Ts common stock totaled approximately $88 million in the recent
quarter, compared with $84 million and $85 million in the quarters ended June 30, 2010 and March
31, 2011, respectively, and represented a quarterly dividend of $.70 per common share in each of
those quarters. Common stock dividends during the six-month periods ended June 30, 2011 and 2010
were $173 million and $167 million, respectively. Cash dividends declared on preferred stock were
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1st Qtr. |
|
|
2nd Qtr. |
|
|
Year-to-date |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Series A
2011 |
|
$ |
7,500 |
|
|
|
7,654 |
|
|
|
15,154 |
|
Series A 2010 |
|
|
7,500 |
|
|
|
7,500 |
|
|
|
15,000 |
|
Series B 2011 |
|
|
1,104 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,104 |
|
Series B 2010 |
|
|
662 |
|
|
|
663 |
|
|
|
1,325 |
|
Series C 2011 |
|
|
1,894 |
|
|
|
1,894 |
|
|
|
3,788 |
|
Series C 2010 |
|
|
1,894 |
|
|
|
1,894 |
|
|
|
3,788 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Totals 2011 |
|
$ |
10,498 |
|
|
|
9,548 |
|
|
|
20,046 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Totals 2010 |
|
$ |
10,056 |
|
|
|
10,057 |
|
|
|
20,113 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On May 18, 2011, M&T redeemed $370 million of the Series A Preferred Stock originally issued
on December 23, 2008 to the U.S. Treasury. The Series B Preferred Stock was converted to M&T
common stock on April 1, 2011. There were no dividends declared during the recent quarter on the
M&T Series D Preferred Stock, which was issued on May 31, 2011. Dividends on that series of
preferred stock, if declared, will be paid semiannually.
The Company did not repurchase any shares of its common stock during 2010 or the first half of
2011.
Federal regulators generally require banking institutions to maintain Tier 1 capital and
total capital ratios of at least 4% and 8%, respectively, of risk-adjusted total assets. In
addition to the risk-based measures, Federal bank regulators have also implemented a minimum Tier
1 leverage ratio guideline of 3% of the quarterly average of total assets. As of June 30, 2011,
Tier 1 capital included trust preferred securities of $1.1 billion as described in note 5 of Notes
to Financial Statements and total capital further included subordinated capital notes of $1.7
billion. Pursuant to the Dodd-Frank Act, trust preferred securities will be phased-out of the
definition of Tier 1 capital of bank holding companies.
- 91 -
The regulatory capital ratios of the Company, M&T Bank and M&T Bank, N.A., as of June 30, 2011
are presented in the accompanying table.
REGULATORY CAPITAL RATIOS
June 30, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M&T |
|
|
M&T |
|
|
M&T |
|
|
|
(Consolidated) |
|
|
Bank |
|
|
Bank, N.A. |
|
Tier 1 capital |
|
|
9.52 |
% |
|
|
8.12 |
% |
|
|
33.03 |
% |
Total capital |
|
|
13.20 |
% |
|
|
11.41 |
% |
|
|
34.10 |
% |
Tier 1 leverage |
|
|
9.80 |
% |
|
|
8.35 |
% |
|
|
23.79 |
% |
Segment Information
As required by GAAP, the Companys reportable segments have been determined based upon its internal
profitability reporting system, which is organized by strategic business unit. Financial
information about the Companys segments is presented in note 14 of Notes to Financial Statements.
The Business Banking segments net income aggregated $27 million in the second quarter of
2011, comparable to the corresponding
2010 quarter and the initial quarter of 2011. As compared with 2010s second quarter, the recent quarters $2
million decline in the provision for credit losses, due to lower net charge-offs of loans, and a $2
million rise in net interest income (reflecting the impact of the Wilmington Trust acquisition) were partially offset by higher personnel expenses totaling $2
million and lower fees earned for providing deposit account services.
As compared with the first quarter of 2011, a $3 million improvement in net
interest income in the recent quarter (reflecting the impact of the
Wilmington Trust acquisition) was partially offset by increases in
personnel, advertising and promotion expenses. Net income recorded by the Business Banking segment
totaled $53 million and $52 million for the first six months of 2011 and 2010, respectively. That
growth in net income was largely attributable to a $7 million decline in the provision for
credit losses, due to lower net charge-offs of loans, partially offset by a $2 million decline in
fees earned for providing deposit account services and higher personnel costs of $2 million.
The
Commercial Banking segment contributed net income of $95 million for the three-month
period ended June 30, 2011, a 17% increase from the $82 million earned in the year-earlier quarter
and 8% higher than the $88 million recorded in 2011s initial quarter. Factors contributing to
the recent quarters improved performance as compared with the corresponding 2010 quarter include:
a $16 million rise in net interest income (about two-thirds of
which related to the Wilmington Trust acquisition), resulting from a $1.9 billion increase in average loan
balances (reflecting the impact of the Wilmington Trust acquisition)
and a 10 basis point expansion of the net interest margin on loans; an increase in other
noninterest revenues totaling $10 million, including $6 million of gains from the sale of
previously leased equipment; and an $8 million rise in credit-related fees, including fees earned
for providing loan syndication services. Partially offsetting those
factors were a $7 million
increase in the provision for credit losses, due predominately to a rise in net charge-offs of
loans, and a $4 million rise in personnel costs. As compared with the
first quarter of 2011, a $1.5 billion rise in average loan balances (reflecting the impact of the Wilmington Trust acquisition)
resulted in a $9 million increase in the recent quarters
net interest income. The majority of that increase in net interest
income related to the Companys expanded presence in the
Mid-Atlantic region as a result of the Wilmington Trust acquisition.
The Commercial Banking segments net contribution increased to
$183 million in the first half of 2011,
a 16% improvement from the $158 million earned in the corresponding 2010 period.
- 92 -
The higher net
income was attributable to a $28 million increase in net interest income and a $13 million rise in
credit-related fees, including fees earned for providing loan syndication services. The improvement
in net interest income was largely attributable to increases in the average balances of this
segments loans and deposits of $1.3 billion each.
Net
income in the Commercial Real Estate segment totaled $65 million in the recent quarter,
49% above the $44 million recorded in the second quarter of 2010
and 33% higher than the $49
million earned in the three months ended March 31, 2011. The improvement in net income in 2011s
second quarter as compared with the year-earlier quarter was the result of reduced
foreclosure-related costs totaling $18 million and a $16 million increase in net interest
income. That latter improvement was due to a 22 basis point widening of the net interest margin on
loans and a $1.6 billion increase in average loan balances.
Nearly two-thirds of the increase in net interest income reflects the impact of the Wilmington Trust acquisition. Compared with the initial 2011
quarter, an $18 million recent quarter decline in
foreclosure-related costs and a $9 million increase in net interest
income were the
main factors contributing to the improved performance.
The increase in net interest income resulted from a $1.2 billion
increase in average loan balances (reflecting the impact of the Wilmington
Trust acquisition).
Through June 30, net income for this
segment increased 30% to $114 million in 2011 from $87 million in 2010. The most significant
contributors to the year-over-year increase in net income were a $26 million rise in net interest
income, resulting from a 27 basis point widening of the net interest margin on loan balances and an
$866 million rise in average loan balances, and lower foreclosure-related expenses of
$16 million.
The Discretionary Portfolio segment recorded net income of $58 million during the quarter
ended June 30, 2011, compared with a net loss of $4 million in the year-earlier quarter and net
income of $16 million in the first quarter of 2011. Included in this segments results for the
recent quarter and the first quarter of 2011 were $111 million and $39 million, respectively, of
gains realized on the sale of investment securities, predominately comprised of residential
mortgage-backed securities guaranteed by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, collateralized debt
obligations and capital preferred securities. Also reflected in this segments results were
other-than-temporary impairment charges (relating primarily to privately issued CMOs), which
totaled $27 million, $10 million and $16 million during the quarters ended June 30, 2011, June 30,
2010, and March 31, 2011, respectively. Excluding the impact of those securities gains and losses,
the Discretionary Portfolio segment contributed net income of $8 million in the recent quarter,
compared with $2 million and $3 million in the second quarter of 2010 and the initial 2011 quarter.
The improved performance in the recent quarter as compared with the earlier quarters reflects a widening of the net interest
margin on investment securities that contributed to higher net interest income. The Discretionary
Portfolios net income totaled $74 million for the first six months of 2011, compared with a net
loss of $20 million in the year-earlier period. Excluding securities gains and losses, net income
recorded in this segment totaled $11 million in the first half of 2011, compared with $1 million in
the first six months of 2010. That improvement was due to a $27 million rise in net interest
income, resulting from a 77 basis point widening of this segments net interest margin on
investment securities, partially offset by a $7 million rise in intersegment costs related to a
higher proportion of residential real estate loans being retained for portfolio in 2011.
Net income from the Residential Mortgage Banking segment aggregated $6 million in the recent
quarter, improved from a net loss of $467 thousand in the second quarter of 2010 and net income of
$5 million earned in 2011s initial quarter. The recent quarters favorable performance as
compared with the year-earlier quarter was primarily the result of an $11 million decline in the
provision for credit losses, the result of a decrease in net charge-
- 93 -
offs of loans. The higher net
income in the second quarter of 2011 compared with the initial quarter of 2011 was largely
attributable to a $2 million decline in personnel costs. Net income earned for the six-month
periods ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 totaled $11 million and $128 thousand, respectively. The
predominant contributor to the rise in net income was a $19 million decline in the provision for
credit losses, due to lower net charge-offs of loans.
Net income recorded by the Retail Banking segment aggregated $55 million, $67 million and $53
million during the three-month periods ended June 30, 2011, June 30, 2010, and March 31, 2011,
respectively. The 19% decline in net income in the recent quarter as compared with the similar
2010 quarter was largely due to an $8 million decrease in fees earned for providing deposit account
services and $5 million increases in each of personnel and other non-interest expenses that were due in part to the Wilmington Trust acquisition. As
compared with the first quarter of 2011, a $12 million rise in fees earned for providing deposit
account services was offset, in large part, by higher personnel costs of $7 million that were due in part to the Wilmington Trust acquisition and
professional services of $2 million. For both quarter-to-quarter
comparisons, the favorable effect on net interest income of higher
deposit balances (reflecting the impact of the Wilmington Trust
acquisition) was offset by a narrowing of the net interest margin on deposits. The Retail Banking segment earned $107 million in the first
half of 2011, 15% below the $126 million recorded in the first six months of 2010. Contributing to
the unfavorable performance in the 2011 period as compared with 2010 were: a $17 million decline in
fees earned for providing deposit account services; higher advertising and promotion costs of $4
million; a $3 million decrease in net interest income; and $3 million increases in each of
personnel costs and professional services expenses. The decrease in net interest income was
largely attributable to a 15 basis point narrowing of the net interest margin on deposit balances,
partially offset by a $1.1 billion increase to this
segments average deposit balances (reflecting the impact of
the Wilmington Trust acquisition). An $11
million reduction in the provision for credit losses, the result of lower net charge-offs of loans, offset a portion of
the unfavorable factors.
The All Other category reflects other activities of the Company that are not directly
attributable to the reported segments. Reflected in this category are the amortization of core
deposit and other intangible assets resulting from the acquisitions of financial institutions,
M&Ts share of the operating losses of BLG, merger-related gains and expenses resulting from
acquisitions of financial institutions and the net impact of the Companys allocation methodologies
for internal transfers for funding charges and credits associated with the earning assets and
interest-bearing liabilities of the Companys reportable segments and the provision for credit
losses. The All Other category also includes the CCS and WAS activities obtained in the
acquisition of Wilmington Trust on May 16, 2011 and the pre-acquisition trust activities of the
Company. As of June 30, 2011 those activities were being operated as separate business lines.
Revenues for CCS, WAS and the non Wilmington Trust-related trust activities were $26 million, $18
million and $29 million in the recent quarter. Individually and combined the net income of those
activities did not exceed 10% of the Companys net income in the recent quarter. The various
components of the All Other category resulted in net
income of $17 million in the quarter ended
June 30, 2011, compared with net losses totaling $26 million and $31 million in the year-earlier
quarter and in the initial quarter of 2011, respectively. The recent quarters improvement as
compared with the two earlier periods reflects a $65 million non-taxable gain on the Wilmington
Trust acquisition offset, in part, by after-tax merger-related expenses incurred in the recent
quarter of $23 million ($37 million pre-tax) and the unfavorable impact from the Companys allocation methodologies for internal transfers for funding charges and credits associated with the
earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities
of the Companys reportable segments and the
provision for credit losses.
- 94 -
The All Other category incurred net losses of $27 million and $64
million for the first six months of 2011 and 2010, respectively. The $65 million non-taxable
merger-related gain related to the acquisition of Wilmington Trust and $26 million of after-tax
effect ($41 million pre-tax) merger-related expenses incurred in the first half of 2011 (there were
no merger-related costs in the first half of 2010) were the main factors contributing to the
year-over-year improvement.
Recent Accounting Developments
In June 2011, the FASB issued amended presentation guidance relating to comprehensive income. The
amendments eliminate the option to present the components of other comprehensive income as part of
the statement of changes in shareholders equity and now require the presentation of total
comprehensive income, the components of net income, and the components of other comprehensive
income either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but
consecutive statements. In both options, an entity is required to present each component of net
income along with total net income, each component of other comprehensive income along with a total
for other comprehensive income, and a total amount for comprehensive income. With either approach,
an entity is required to present reclassification adjustments for items reclassified from other
comprehensive income to net income in the statement(s). The guidance is effective for fiscal
years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011 and should be
applied retrospectively. The Company intends to comply with the new presentation guidance when it
becomes effective.
In May 2011, the FASB issued amended accounting and disclosure guidance relating to fair value
measurements. The amendments were the result of the FASB and the International Accounting
Standards Board developing common requirements for measuring fair value and for disclosing
information about fair value measurements. The amendments change the wording used to describe several of the
requirements for measuring fair value and for disclosing information about fair value measurements,
but generally do not result in a change in the application of the existing guidance. The guidance
is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011 and should be applied
prospectively. The Company intends to comply with the amended accounting and disclosure guidance
when it becomes effective, but does not anticipate that the adoption of this guidance will have a
significant impact on any of its fair value measurements.
In April 2011, the FASB issued amended accounting guidance relating to the assessment of
effective control for repurchase agreements. The amendments remove from the assessment of
effective control the criterion requiring the transferor to have the ability to repurchase or
redeem the financial assets on substantially the agreed terms, even in the event of default by the
transferee. The amendments also remove the collateral maintenance implementation guidance related
to that criterion. The guidance is effective for the first interim or annual period beginning on
or after December 15, 2011 and should be applied prospectively to transactions or modifications of
existing transactions that occur on or after the effective date. The Company does not anticipate
that the adoption of this guidance will have a significant effect on the reporting of its financial
position or results of its operations.
In April 2011, the FASB issued amended accounting and disclosure guidance relating to a
creditors determination of whether a restructuring is a troubled debt restructuring. The
amendments clarify the guidance on a creditors evaluation of whether it has granted a concession
and whether a debtor is experiencing financial difficulties. The amendments are effective
for the
first interim or annual period beginning on or after June 15, 2011
- 95 -
and should be applied
retrospectively to the beginning of the annual period of adoption. As a result of the application
of the amendments, receivables previously measured under loss contingency guidance that are newly
considered impaired should be disclosed, along with the related allowance for credit losses, as of
the end of the period of adoption. For purposes of measuring impairment of those receivables, an
entity should apply the amendments prospectively for the first interim or annual period beginning
on or after June 15, 2011. The deferred credit risk disclosure guidance issued in July 2010
relating to troubled debt restructurings will now be effective for interim and annual periods
beginning on or after June 15, 2011. The Company intends to comply with the new accounting and
disclosure requirements. The Company does not anticipate that the adoption of this guidance will
have a significant effect on the reporting of its financial position or results of its operations.
In December 2010, the FASB issued amended disclosure guidance relating to the pro forma
information for business combinations that occurred in the current reporting period. The amended
disclosure states that if an entity presents comparative financial statements, the entity should
disclose revenue and earnings of the combined entity as though the business combination(s) that
occurred during the current year had occurred as of the beginning of the comparable prior annual
reporting period. The guidance is effective prospectively for business combinations for which the
acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or
after December 15, 2010. The Company has complied with these disclosure requirements in the
reporting of pro forma information in note 2 of Notes to Financial Statements with respect to its
business combination with Wilmington Trust.
In October 2010, the FASB issued amended accounting guidance relating to the goodwill
impairment test for reporting units with zero or negative carrying amounts. For those reporting
units with zero or negative carrying amounts, an entity is required to perform Step Two of the goodwill impairment test if it is
more likely than not that a goodwill impairment exists. In determining whether it is more likely
than not that a goodwill impairment exists, an entity should consider whether there are any adverse
qualitative factors indicating that an impairment may exist. The guidance is effective for fiscal
years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2010. The Company does
not anticipate that the adoption of this guidance will have a significant impact on the reporting
of its financial position or results of its operations.
Forward-Looking Statements
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and other
sections of this quarterly report contain forward-looking statements that are based on current
expectations, estimates and projections about the Companys business, managements beliefs and
assumptions made by management. Forward-looking statements are typically identified by words such
as believe, expect, anticipate, intend, target, estimate, continue, positions,
prospects or potential, by future conditional verbs such as will, would, should, could,
or may, or by variations of such words or by similar expressions. These statements are not
guarantees of future performance and involve certain risks, uncertainties and assumptions (Future
Factors) which are difficult to predict. Therefore, actual outcomes and results may differ
materially from what is expressed or forecasted in such forward-looking statements.
Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made and we assume no duty to update
forward-looking statements.
- 96 -
Future Factors include changes in interest rates, spreads on earning assets and
interest-bearing liabilities, and interest rate sensitivity; prepayment speeds, loan originations,
credit losses and market values on loans, collateral securing loans and other assets; sources of
liquidity; common shares outstanding; common stock price volatility; fair value of and number of
stock-based compensation awards to be issued in future periods; legislation affecting the financial
services industry as a whole, and M&T and its subsidiaries individually or collectively, including
tax legislation; regulatory supervision and oversight, including monetary policy and capital
requirements; changes in accounting policies or procedures as may be required by the FASB or other
regulatory agencies; increasing price and product/service competition by competitors, including new
entrants; rapid technological developments and changes; the ability to continue to introduce
competitive new products and services on a timely, cost-effective basis; the mix of
products/services; containing costs and expenses; governmental and public policy changes;
protection and validity of intellectual property rights; reliance on large customers;
technological, implementation and cost/financial risks in large, multi-year contracts; the outcome
of pending and future litigation and governmental proceedings, including tax-related examinations
and other matters; continued availability of financing; financial resources in the amounts, at the
times and on the terms required to support M&T and its subsidiaries future businesses; and
material differences in the actual financial results of merger, acquisition and investment
activities compared with M&Ts initial expectations, including the full realization of anticipated
cost savings and revenue enhancements.
These are representative of the Future Factors that could affect the outcome of the forward-looking
statements. In addition, such statements could be affected by general industry and market
conditions and growth rates, general economic and political conditions, either nationally or in the
states in which M&T and its subsidiaries do business, including interest rate and
currency exchange rate fluctuations, changes and trends in the securities markets, and other Future
Factors.
- 97 -
M&T BANK CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Table 1
QUARTERLY TRENDS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 Quarters |
|
|
2010 Quarters |
|
|
|
Second |
|
|
First |
|
|
Fourth |
|
|
Third |
|
|
Second |
|
|
First |
|
|
Earnings and dividends |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts in thousands, except per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income (taxableequivalent basis) |
|
$ |
694,721 |
|
|
|
673,810 |
|
|
|
688,855 |
|
|
|
691,765 |
|
|
|
690,889 |
|
|
|
682,309 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
102,051 |
|
|
|
98,679 |
|
|
|
108,628 |
|
|
|
116,032 |
|
|
|
117,557 |
|
|
|
120,052 |
|
|
Net interest income |
|
|
592,670 |
|
|
|
575,131 |
|
|
|
580,227 |
|
|
|
575,733 |
|
|
|
573,332 |
|
|
|
562,257 |
|
Less: provision for credit losses |
|
|
63,000 |
|
|
|
75,000 |
|
|
|
85,000 |
|
|
|
93,000 |
|
|
|
85,000 |
|
|
|
105,000 |
|
Other income |
|
|
501,656 |
|
|
|
314,420 |
|
|
|
286,938 |
|
|
|
289,899 |
|
|
|
273,557 |
|
|
|
257,706 |
|
Less: other expense |
|
|
576,895 |
|
|
|
499,571 |
|
|
|
469,274 |
|
|
|
480,133 |
|
|
|
476,068 |
|
|
|
489,362 |
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
454,431 |
|
|
|
314,980 |
|
|
|
312,891 |
|
|
|
292,499 |
|
|
|
285,821 |
|
|
|
225,601 |
|
Applicable income taxes |
|
|
125,605 |
|
|
|
102,380 |
|
|
|
102,319 |
|
|
|
94,619 |
|
|
|
90,967 |
|
|
|
68,723 |
|
Taxableequivalent adjustment |
|
|
6,468 |
|
|
|
6,327 |
|
|
|
6,130 |
|
|
|
5,865 |
|
|
|
6,105 |
|
|
|
5,923 |
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
322,358 |
|
|
|
206,273 |
|
|
|
204,442 |
|
|
|
192,015 |
|
|
|
188,749 |
|
|
|
150,955 |
|
|
Net income available to common shareholdersdiluted |
|
$ |
297,179 |
|
|
|
190,121 |
|
|
|
189,678 |
|
|
|
176,789 |
|
|
|
173,597 |
|
|
|
136,431 |
|
Per common share data |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings |
|
$ |
2.43 |
|
|
|
1.59 |
|
|
|
1.59 |
|
|
|
1.49 |
|
|
|
1.47 |
|
|
|
1.16 |
|
Diluted earnings |
|
|
2.42 |
|
|
|
1.59 |
|
|
|
1.59 |
|
|
|
1.48 |
|
|
|
1.46 |
|
|
|
1.15 |
|
Cash dividends |
|
$ |
.70 |
|
|
|
.70 |
|
|
|
.70 |
|
|
|
.70 |
|
|
|
.70 |
|
|
|
.70 |
|
Average common shares outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
122,181 |
|
|
|
119,201 |
|
|
|
118,613 |
|
|
|
118,320 |
|
|
|
118,054 |
|
|
|
117,765 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
122,796 |
|
|
|
119,852 |
|
|
|
119,503 |
|
|
|
119,155 |
|
|
|
118,878 |
|
|
|
118,256 |
|
|
Performance ratios, annualized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average assets |
|
|
1.78 |
% |
|
|
1.23 |
% |
|
|
1.18 |
% |
|
|
1.12 |
% |
|
|
1.11 |
% |
|
|
.89 |
% |
Average common shareholders equity |
|
|
14.94 |
% |
|
|
10.16 |
% |
|
|
10.03 |
% |
|
|
9.56 |
% |
|
|
9.67 |
% |
|
|
7.86 |
% |
Net interest margin on average earning assets
(taxableequivalent basis) |
|
|
3.75 |
% |
|
|
3.92 |
% |
|
|
3.85 |
% |
|
|
3.87 |
% |
|
|
3.84 |
% |
|
|
3.78 |
% |
Nonaccrual loans to total loans and leases,
net of unearned discount |
|
|
2.15 |
% |
|
|
2.32 |
% |
|
|
2.38 |
% |
|
|
2.16 |
% |
|
|
2.13 |
% |
|
|
2.60 |
% |
Efficiency ratio (a) |
|
|
57.12 |
% |
|
|
57.18 |
% |
|
|
54.08 |
% |
|
|
54.95 |
% |
|
|
54.77 |
% |
|
|
57.82 |
% |
|
Net operating (tangible) results (b) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating income (in thousands) |
|
$ |
289,487 |
|
|
|
216,360 |
|
|
|
196,235 |
|
|
|
200,225 |
|
|
|
197,752 |
|
|
|
160,953 |
|
Diluted net operating income per common share |
|
|
2.16 |
|
|
|
1.67 |
|
|
|
1.52 |
|
|
|
1.55 |
|
|
|
1.53 |
|
|
|
1.23 |
|
Annualized return on |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average tangible assets |
|
|
1.69 |
% |
|
|
1.36 |
% |
|
|
1.20 |
% |
|
|
1.24 |
% |
|
|
1.23 |
% |
|
|
1.00 |
% |
Average tangible common shareholders equity |
|
|
24.40 |
% |
|
|
20.16 |
% |
|
|
18.43 |
% |
|
|
19.58 |
% |
|
|
20.36 |
% |
|
|
17.34 |
% |
Efficiency ratio (a) |
|
|
55.56 |
% |
|
|
55.75 |
% |
|
|
52.55 |
% |
|
|
53.40 |
% |
|
|
53.06 |
% |
|
|
55.88 |
% |
|
Balance sheet data |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In millions, except per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average balances |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets (c) |
|
$ |
72,454 |
|
|
|
68,045 |
|
|
|
68,502 |
|
|
|
67,811 |
|
|
|
68,334 |
|
|
|
68,883 |
|
Total tangible assets (c) |
|
|
68,777 |
|
|
|
64,423 |
|
|
|
64,869 |
|
|
|
64,167 |
|
|
|
64,679 |
|
|
|
65,216 |
|
Earning assets |
|
|
63,382 |
|
|
|
59,431 |
|
|
|
59,737 |
|
|
|
59,066 |
|
|
|
59,811 |
|
|
|
60,331 |
|
Investment securities |
|
|
6,394 |
|
|
|
7,219 |
|
|
|
7,541 |
|
|
|
7,993 |
|
|
|
8,376 |
|
|
|
8,172 |
|
Loans and leases, net of unearned discount |
|
|
55,461 |
|
|
|
51,972 |
|
|
|
51,141 |
|
|
|
50,835 |
|
|
|
51,278 |
|
|
|
51,948 |
|
Deposits |
|
|
54,457 |
|
|
|
49,680 |
|
|
|
49,271 |
|
|
|
47,530 |
|
|
|
47,932 |
|
|
|
47,394 |
|
Common shareholders equity (c) |
|
|
8,096 |
|
|
|
7,708 |
|
|
|
7,582 |
|
|
|
7,444 |
|
|
|
7,302 |
|
|
|
7,136 |
|
Tangible common shareholders equity (c) |
|
|
4,419 |
|
|
|
4,086 |
|
|
|
3,949 |
|
|
|
3,800 |
|
|
|
3,647 |
|
|
|
3,469 |
|
|
At end of quarter |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets (c) |
|
$ |
77,727 |
|
|
|
67,881 |
|
|
|
68,021 |
|
|
|
68,247 |
|
|
|
68,154 |
|
|
|
68,439 |
|
Total tangible assets (c) |
|
|
73,995 |
|
|
|
64,263 |
|
|
|
64,393 |
|
|
|
64,609 |
|
|
|
64,505 |
|
|
|
64,778 |
|
Earning assets |
|
|
67,837 |
|
|
|
58,822 |
|
|
|
59,434 |
|
|
|
59,388 |
|
|
|
59,368 |
|
|
|
59,741 |
|
Investment securities |
|
|
6,492 |
|
|
|
6,507 |
|
|
|
7,151 |
|
|
|
7,663 |
|
|
|
8,098 |
|
|
|
8,105 |
|
Loans and leases, net of unearned discount |
|
|
58,541 |
|
|
|
52,119 |
|
|
|
51,990 |
|
|
|
50,792 |
|
|
|
51,061 |
|
|
|
51,444 |
|
Deposits |
|
|
59,229 |
|
|
|
50,548 |
|
|
|
49,805 |
|
|
|
48,655 |
|
|
|
47,523 |
|
|
|
47,538 |
|
Common shareholders equity, net of undeclared
cumulative preferred dividends (c) |
|
|
8,380 |
|
|
|
7,758 |
|
|
|
7,611 |
|
|
|
7,488 |
|
|
|
7,360 |
|
|
|
7,177 |
|
Tangible common shareholders equity (c) |
|
|
4,648 |
|
|
|
4,140 |
|
|
|
3,983 |
|
|
|
3,850 |
|
|
|
3,711 |
|
|
|
3,516 |
|
Equity per common share |
|
|
66.71 |
|
|
|
64.43 |
|
|
|
63.54 |
|
|
|
62.69 |
|
|
|
61.77 |
|
|
|
60.40 |
|
Tangible equity per common share |
|
|
37.00 |
|
|
|
34.38 |
|
|
|
33.26 |
|
|
|
32.23 |
|
|
|
31.15 |
|
|
|
29.59 |
|
|
Market price per common share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High |
|
$ |
90.76 |
|
|
|
91.05 |
|
|
|
87.87 |
|
|
|
95.00 |
|
|
|
96.15 |
|
|
|
85.00 |
|
Low |
|
|
83.31 |
|
|
|
84.63 |
|
|
|
72.03 |
|
|
|
81.08 |
|
|
|
74.11 |
|
|
|
66.32 |
|
Closing |
|
|
87.95 |
|
|
|
88.47 |
|
|
|
87.05 |
|
|
|
81.81 |
|
|
|
84.95 |
|
|
|
79.38 |
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Excludes impact of mergerrelated gains and expenses and net securities transactions. |
|
(b) |
|
Excludes amortization and balances related to goodwill and core deposit and other intangible
assets and mergerrelated gains and expenses which, except in the calculation of the efficiency
ratio, are net of applicable income tax effects. A reconciliation of net income and net operating
income appears in Table 2. |
|
(c) |
|
The difference between total assets and total tangible assets, and common shareholders equity
and tangible common shareholders equity, represents goodwill, core deposit and other intangible
assets, net of applicable deferred tax balances. A reconciliation of such balances appears in
Table 2. |
- 98 -
M&T BANK CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Table 2
RECONCILIATION OF QUARTERLY GAAP TO NONGAAP MEASURES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 Quarters |
|
|
2010 Quarters |
|
|
|
Second |
|
|
First |
|
|
Fourth |
|
|
Third |
|
|
Second |
|
|
First |
|
|
Income statement data |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In thousands, except per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
322,358 |
|
|
|
206,273 |
|
|
|
204,442 |
|
|
|
192,015 |
|
|
|
188,749 |
|
|
|
150,955 |
|
Amortization of core deposit and other
intangible assets (a) |
|
|
8,974 |
|
|
|
7,478 |
|
|
|
8,054 |
|
|
|
8,210 |
|
|
|
9,003 |
|
|
|
9,998 |
|
Mergerrelated gain (a) |
|
|
(64,930 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16,730 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mergerrelated expenses (a) |
|
|
23,085 |
|
|
|
2,609 |
|
|
|
469 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating income |
|
$ |
289,487 |
|
|
|
216,360 |
|
|
|
196,235 |
|
|
|
200,225 |
|
|
|
197,752 |
|
|
|
160,953 |
|
|
Earnings per common share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per common share |
|
$ |
2.42 |
|
|
|
1.59 |
|
|
|
1.59 |
|
|
|
1.48 |
|
|
|
1.46 |
|
|
|
1.15 |
|
Amortization of core deposit and other
intangible assets (a) |
|
|
.07 |
|
|
|
.06 |
|
|
|
.07 |
|
|
|
.07 |
|
|
|
.07 |
|
|
|
.08 |
|
Mergerrelated gain (a) |
|
|
(.52 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(.14 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mergerrelated expenses (a) |
|
|
.19 |
|
|
|
.02 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted net operating earnings per common share |
|
$ |
2.16 |
|
|
|
1.67 |
|
|
|
1.52 |
|
|
|
1.55 |
|
|
|
1.53 |
|
|
|
1.23 |
|
|
Other expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other expense |
|
$ |
576,895 |
|
|
|
499,571 |
|
|
|
469,274 |
|
|
|
480,133 |
|
|
|
476,068 |
|
|
|
489,362 |
|
Amortization of core deposit and other
intangible assets |
|
|
(14,740 |
) |
|
|
(12,314 |
) |
|
|
(13,269 |
) |
|
|
(13,526 |
) |
|
|
(14,833 |
) |
|
|
(16,475 |
) |
Mergerrelated expenses |
|
|
(36,996 |
) |
|
|
(4,295 |
) |
|
|
(771 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest operating expense |
|
$ |
525,159 |
|
|
|
482,962 |
|
|
|
455,234 |
|
|
|
466,607 |
|
|
|
461,235 |
|
|
|
472,887 |
|
|
Mergerrelated expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries and employee benefits |
|
$ |
15,305 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equipment and net occupancy |
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
79 |
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Printing, postage and supplies |
|
|
318 |
|
|
|
147 |
|
|
|
74 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other costs of operations |
|
|
21,348 |
|
|
|
4,062 |
|
|
|
646 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
36,996 |
|
|
|
4,295 |
|
|
|
771 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance sheet data |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In millions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average assets |
|
$ |
72,454 |
|
|
|
68,045 |
|
|
|
68,502 |
|
|
|
67,811 |
|
|
|
68,334 |
|
|
|
68,883 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
(3,525 |
) |
|
|
(3,525 |
) |
|
|
(3,525 |
) |
|
|
(3,525 |
) |
|
|
(3,525 |
) |
|
|
(3,525 |
) |
Core deposit and other intangible assets |
|
|
(198 |
) |
|
|
(119 |
) |
|
|
(132 |
) |
|
|
(146 |
) |
|
|
(160 |
) |
|
|
(176 |
) |
Deferred taxes |
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
Average tangible assets |
|
$ |
68,777 |
|
|
|
64,423 |
|
|
|
64,869 |
|
|
|
64,167 |
|
|
|
64,679 |
|
|
|
65,216 |
|
|
Average common equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average total equity |
|
$ |
8,812 |
|
|
|
8,451 |
|
|
|
8,322 |
|
|
|
8,181 |
|
|
|
8,036 |
|
|
|
7,868 |
|
Preferred stock |
|
|
(716 |
) |
|
|
(743 |
) |
|
|
(740 |
) |
|
|
(737 |
) |
|
|
(734 |
) |
|
|
(732 |
) |
|
Average common equity |
|
|
8,096 |
|
|
|
7,708 |
|
|
|
7,582 |
|
|
|
7,444 |
|
|
|
7,302 |
|
|
|
7,136 |
|
|
Goodwill |
|
|
(3,525 |
) |
|
|
(3,525 |
) |
|
|
(3,525 |
) |
|
|
(3,525 |
) |
|
|
(3,525 |
) |
|
|
(3,525 |
) |
Core deposit and other intangible assets |
|
|
(198 |
) |
|
|
(119 |
) |
|
|
(132 |
) |
|
|
(146 |
) |
|
|
(160 |
) |
|
|
(176 |
) |
Deferred taxes |
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
Average tangible common equity |
|
$ |
4,419 |
|
|
|
4,086 |
|
|
|
3,949 |
|
|
|
3,800 |
|
|
|
3,647 |
|
|
|
3,469 |
|
|
At end of quarter |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
77,727 |
|
|
|
67,881 |
|
|
|
68,021 |
|
|
|
68,247 |
|
|
|
68,154 |
|
|
|
68,439 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
(3,525 |
) |
|
|
(3,525 |
) |
|
|
(3,525 |
) |
|
|
(3,525 |
) |
|
|
(3,525 |
) |
|
|
(3,525 |
) |
Core deposit and other intangible assets |
|
|
(275 |
) |
|
|
(113 |
) |
|
|
(126 |
) |
|
|
(139 |
) |
|
|
(152 |
) |
|
|
(167 |
) |
Deferred taxes |
|
|
68 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
Total tangible assets |
|
$ |
73,995 |
|
|
|
64,263 |
|
|
|
64,393 |
|
|
|
64,609 |
|
|
|
64,505 |
|
|
|
64,778 |
|
|
Total common equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity |
|
$ |
9,244 |
|
|
|
8,508 |
|
|
|
8,358 |
|
|
|
8,232 |
|
|
|
8,102 |
|
|
|
7,916 |
|
Preferred stock |
|
|
(861 |
) |
|
|
(743 |
) |
|
|
(741 |
) |
|
|
(738 |
) |
|
|
(735 |
) |
|
|
(733 |
) |
Undeclared dividends cumulative preferred stock |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
Common equity, net of undeclared cumulative
preferred dividends |
|
|
8,380 |
|
|
|
7,758 |
|
|
|
7,611 |
|
|
|
7,488 |
|
|
|
7,360 |
|
|
|
7,177 |
|
|
Goodwill |
|
|
(3,525 |
) |
|
|
(3,525 |
) |
|
|
(3,525 |
) |
|
|
(3,525 |
) |
|
|
(3,525 |
) |
|
|
(3,525 |
) |
Core deposit and other intangible assets |
|
|
(275 |
) |
|
|
(113 |
) |
|
|
(126 |
) |
|
|
(139 |
) |
|
|
(152 |
) |
|
|
(167 |
) |
Deferred taxes |
|
|
68 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
Total tangible common equity |
|
$ |
4,648 |
|
|
|
4,140 |
|
|
|
3,983 |
|
|
|
3,850 |
|
|
|
3,711 |
|
|
|
3,516 |
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
After any related tax effect. |
- 99 -
M&T BANK CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Table 3
AVERAGE BALANCE SHEETS AND ANNUALIZED TAXABLEEQUIVALENT RATES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 Second Quarter |
|
|
2011 First Quarter |
|
|
2010 Fourth Quarter |
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
Average balance in millions; interest in thousands |
|
Balance |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earning assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans and leases, net of unearned discount* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial, financial, etc. |
|
$ |
14,623 |
|
|
$ |
141,723 |
|
|
|
3.89 |
% |
|
|
13,573 |
|
|
|
131,619 |
|
|
|
3.93 |
% |
|
|
13,013 |
|
|
|
133,562 |
|
|
|
4.07 |
% |
Real estate commercial |
|
|
22,471 |
|
|
|
257,787 |
|
|
|
4.59 |
|
|
|
21,003 |
|
|
|
247,276 |
|
|
|
4.71 |
|
|
|
20,624 |
|
|
|
249,720 |
|
|
|
4.84 |
|
Real estate consumer |
|
|
6,559 |
|
|
|
81,943 |
|
|
|
5.00 |
|
|
|
6,054 |
|
|
|
76,642 |
|
|
|
5.06 |
|
|
|
5,910 |
|
|
|
76,024 |
|
|
|
5.15 |
|
Consumer |
|
|
11,808 |
|
|
|
148,028 |
|
|
|
5.03 |
|
|
|
11,342 |
|
|
|
143,519 |
|
|
|
5.13 |
|
|
|
11,594 |
|
|
|
151,300 |
|
|
|
5.18 |
|
|
Total loans and leases, net |
|
|
55,461 |
|
|
|
629,481 |
|
|
|
4.55 |
|
|
|
51,972 |
|
|
|
599,056 |
|
|
|
4.67 |
|
|
|
51,141 |
|
|
|
610,606 |
|
|
|
4.74 |
|
|
Interest-bearing deposits at banks |
|
|
804 |
|
|
|
479 |
|
|
|
.24 |
|
|
|
115 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
.13 |
|
|
|
110 |
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
.15 |
|
Federal funds sold and agreements to resell securities |
|
|
622 |
|
|
|
137 |
|
|
|
.09 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
.53 |
|
|
|
780 |
|
|
|
381 |
|
|
|
.19 |
|
Trading account |
|
|
101 |
|
|
|
331 |
|
|
|
1.32 |
|
|
|
110 |
|
|
|
442 |
|
|
|
1.61 |
|
|
|
165 |
|
|
|
375 |
|
|
|
.91 |
|
Investment securities** |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury and federal agencies |
|
|
3,436 |
|
|
|
33,227 |
|
|
|
3.88 |
|
|
|
4,089 |
|
|
|
42,078 |
|
|
|
4.17 |
|
|
|
4,237 |
|
|
|
43,246 |
|
|
|
4.05 |
|
Obligations of states and political subdivisions |
|
|
250 |
|
|
|
3,439 |
|
|
|
5.51 |
|
|
|
250 |
|
|
|
3,479 |
|
|
|
5.64 |
|
|
|
256 |
|
|
|
3,663 |
|
|
|
5.69 |
|
Other |
|
|
2,708 |
|
|
|
27,627 |
|
|
|
4.09 |
|
|
|
2,880 |
|
|
|
28,700 |
|
|
|
4.04 |
|
|
|
3,048 |
|
|
|
30,541 |
|
|
|
3.98 |
|
|
Total investment securities |
|
|
6,394 |
|
|
|
64,293 |
|
|
|
4.03 |
|
|
|
7,219 |
|
|
|
74,257 |
|
|
|
4.17 |
|
|
|
7,541 |
|
|
|
77,450 |
|
|
|
4.07 |
|
|
Total earning assets |
|
|
63,382 |
|
|
|
694,721 |
|
|
|
4.40 |
|
|
|
59,431 |
|
|
|
673,810 |
|
|
|
4.60 |
|
|
|
59,737 |
|
|
|
688,855 |
|
|
|
4.58 |
|
|
Allowance for credit losses |
|
|
(913 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(914 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(910 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks |
|
|
1,116 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,091 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,111 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets |
|
|
8,869 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,437 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,564 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
72,454 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
68,045 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
68,502 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and shareholders equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing deposits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOW accounts |
|
$ |
742 |
|
|
|
274 |
|
|
|
.15 |
|
|
|
628 |
|
|
|
202 |
|
|
|
.13 |
|
|
|
608 |
|
|
|
212 |
|
|
|
.14 |
|
Savings deposits |
|
|
30,043 |
|
|
|
20,757 |
|
|
|
.28 |
|
|
|
27,669 |
|
|
|
19,239 |
|
|
|
.28 |
|
|
|
27,545 |
|
|
|
21,860 |
|
|
|
.31 |
|
Time deposits |
|
|
6,657 |
|
|
|
19,310 |
|
|
|
1.16 |
|
|
|
5,700 |
|
|
|
19,071 |
|
|
|
1.36 |
|
|
|
6,034 |
|
|
|
21,232 |
|
|
|
1.40 |
|
Deposits at Cayman Islands office |
|
|
820 |
|
|
|
193 |
|
|
|
.09 |
|
|
|
1,182 |
|
|
|
394 |
|
|
|
.14 |
|
|
|
809 |
|
|
|
352 |
|
|
|
.17 |
|
|
Total interest-bearing deposits |
|
|
38,262 |
|
|
|
40,534 |
|
|
|
.42 |
|
|
|
35,179 |
|
|
|
38,906 |
|
|
|
.45 |
|
|
|
34,996 |
|
|
|
43,656 |
|
|
|
.49 |
|
|
Short-term borrowings |
|
|
707 |
|
|
|
147 |
|
|
|
.08 |
|
|
|
1,344 |
|
|
|
492 |
|
|
|
.15 |
|
|
|
1,439 |
|
|
|
633 |
|
|
|
.17 |
|
Long-term borrowings |
|
|
7,076 |
|
|
|
61,370 |
|
|
|
3.48 |
|
|
|
7,368 |
|
|
|
59,281 |
|
|
|
3.26 |
|
|
|
8,141 |
|
|
|
64,339 |
|
|
|
3.14 |
|
|
Total interest-bearing liabilities |
|
|
46,045 |
|
|
|
102,051 |
|
|
|
.89 |
|
|
|
43,891 |
|
|
|
98,679 |
|
|
|
.91 |
|
|
|
44,576 |
|
|
|
108,628 |
|
|
|
.97 |
|
|
Noninterest-bearing deposits |
|
|
16,195 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,501 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,275 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
1,402 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,202 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,329 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
63,642 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59,594 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60,180 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity |
|
|
8,812 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,451 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,322 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
|
$ |
72,454 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
68,045 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
68,502 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest spread |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.51 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.69 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.61 |
|
Contribution of interest-free funds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.24 |
|
|
Net interest income/margin on earning assets |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
592,670 |
|
|
|
3.75 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
575,131 |
|
|
|
3.92 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
580,227 |
|
|
|
3.85 |
% |
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Includes nonaccrual loans. |
|
** |
|
Includes available for sale securities at amortized cost. |
(continued)
- 100 -
M&T BANK CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Table 3 (continued)
AVERAGE BALANCE SHEETS AND ANNUALIZED TAXABLEEQUIVALENT RATES (continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 Third Quarter |
|
|
2010 Second Quarter |
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
Average balance in millions; interest in thousands |
|
Balance |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earning assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans and leases, net of unearned discount* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial, financial, etc. |
|
$ |
12,856 |
|
|
$ |
128,578 |
|
|
|
3.97 |
% |
|
|
13,096 |
|
|
|
131,460 |
|
|
|
4.03 |
% |
Real estate commercial |
|
|
20,612 |
|
|
|
250,038 |
|
|
|
4.85 |
|
|
|
20,759 |
|
|
|
240,728 |
|
|
|
4.64 |
|
Real estate consumer |
|
|
5,680 |
|
|
|
75,312 |
|
|
|
5.30 |
|
|
|
5,653 |
|
|
|
75,643 |
|
|
|
5.35 |
|
Consumer |
|
|
11,687 |
|
|
|
153,763 |
|
|
|
5.22 |
|
|
|
11,770 |
|
|
|
153,728 |
|
|
|
5.24 |
|
|
Total loans and leases, net |
|
|
50,835 |
|
|
|
607,691 |
|
|
|
4.74 |
|
|
|
51,278 |
|
|
|
601,559 |
|
|
|
4.71 |
|
|
Interestbearing deposits at banks |
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
.15 |
|
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
.02 |
|
Federal funds sold and agreements
to resell securities |
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
.26 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
.41 |
|
Trading account |
|
|
82 |
|
|
|
134 |
|
|
|
.65 |
|
|
|
66 |
|
|
|
159 |
|
|
|
.96 |
|
Investment securities** |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury and federal agencies |
|
|
4,541 |
|
|
|
48,018 |
|
|
|
4.20 |
|
|
|
4,758 |
|
|
|
51,282 |
|
|
|
4.32 |
|
Obligations of states and political subdivisions |
|
|
271 |
|
|
|
3,740 |
|
|
|
5.48 |
|
|
|
272 |
|
|
|
3,963 |
|
|
|
5.85 |
|
Other |
|
|
3,181 |
|
|
|
32,107 |
|
|
|
4.00 |
|
|
|
3,346 |
|
|
|
33,910 |
|
|
|
4.07 |
|
|
Total investment securities |
|
|
7,993 |
|
|
|
83,865 |
|
|
|
4.16 |
|
|
|
8,376 |
|
|
|
89,155 |
|
|
|
4.27 |
|
|
Total earning assets |
|
|
59,066 |
|
|
|
691,765 |
|
|
|
4.65 |
|
|
|
59,811 |
|
|
|
690,889 |
|
|
|
4.63 |
|
|
Allowance for credit losses |
|
|
(908 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(905 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks |
|
|
1,081 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,068 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets |
|
|
8,572 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,360 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
67,811 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
68,334 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and shareholders equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interestbearing liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interestbearing deposits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOW accounts |
|
$ |
592 |
|
|
|
219 |
|
|
|
.15 |
|
|
|
619 |
|
|
|
219 |
|
|
|
.14 |
|
Savings deposits |
|
|
26,177 |
|
|
|
21,453 |
|
|
|
.33 |
|
|
|
25,942 |
|
|
|
21,464 |
|
|
|
.33 |
|
Time deposits |
|
|
6,312 |
|
|
|
23,309 |
|
|
|
1.46 |
|
|
|
6,789 |
|
|
|
26,254 |
|
|
|
1.55 |
|
Deposits at Cayman Islands office |
|
|
802 |
|
|
|
315 |
|
|
|
.16 |
|
|
|
972 |
|
|
|
376 |
|
|
|
.16 |
|
|
Total interestbearing deposits |
|
|
33,883 |
|
|
|
45,296 |
|
|
|
.53 |
|
|
|
34,322 |
|
|
|
48,313 |
|
|
|
.56 |
|
|
Shortterm borrowings |
|
|
1,858 |
|
|
|
760 |
|
|
|
.16 |
|
|
|
1,763 |
|
|
|
726 |
|
|
|
.17 |
|
Longterm borrowings |
|
|
8,948 |
|
|
|
69,976 |
|
|
|
3.10 |
|
|
|
9,454 |
|
|
|
68,518 |
|
|
|
2.91 |
|
|
Total interestbearing liabilities |
|
|
44,689 |
|
|
|
116,032 |
|
|
|
1.03 |
|
|
|
45,539 |
|
|
|
117,557 |
|
|
|
1.04 |
|
|
Noninterestbearing deposits |
|
|
13,647 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,610 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
1,294 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,149 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
59,630 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60,298 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity |
|
|
8,181 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,036 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
|
$ |
67,811 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
68,334 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest spread |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.62 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.59 |
|
Contribution of interestfree funds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.25 |
|
|
Net interest income/margin on earning assets |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
575,733 |
|
|
|
3.87 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
573,332 |
|
|
|
3.84 |
% |
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Includes nonaccrual loans. |
|
** |
|
Includes available for sale securities at amortized cost. |
- 101 -
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
Incorporated by reference to the discussion contained under the caption Taxable-equivalent
Net Interest Income in Part I, Item 2, Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures.
(a) Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures. Based upon their evaluation of the
effectiveness of M&Ts disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)), Robert G. Wilmers, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, and
René F. Jones, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, concluded that M&Ts
disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of June 30, 2011.
(b) Changes in internal control over financial reporting. M&T regularly assesses the adequacy
of its internal control over financial reporting and enhances its controls in response to internal
control assessments and internal and external audit and regulatory recommendations. On May 16,
2011, M&T completed its acquisition of Wilmington Trust. At June 30, 2011, some of the former
operations of Wilmington Trust continued to operate under pre-acquisition systems of internal
control over financial reporting. M&T has extended its internal control oversight and monitoring
processes to include the acquired operations of the former Wilmington Trust. Except as described
above, no changes occurred during the quarter ended June 30, 2011 that have materially affected, or
are reasonably likely to materially affect, M&Ts internal control over financial reporting.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings.
M&T and its subsidiaries are subject in the normal course of business to various pending and
threatened legal proceedings in which claims for monetary damages are asserted. Management, after
consultation with legal counsel, does not anticipate that the aggregate ultimate liability arising
out of litigation pending or threatened against M&T or its subsidiaries will be material to the
Companys consolidated financial position. On an on-going basis the Company assesses its
liabilities and contingencies in connection with such legal proceedings. For those matters where
it is probable that the Company will incur losses and the amounts of the losses can be reasonably
estimated, the Company records an expense and corresponding liability in its consolidated financial
statements. To the extent the pending or threatened litigation could result in exposure in excess
of that liability, the amount of such excess is not currently estimable. Although not considered probable, the range of
reasonably possible losses for such matters in the aggregate, beyond the existing recorded
liability, was between $0 and $40 million.
Although the Company does not believe that the outcome of pending litigations will
be material to the Companys consolidated financial position, it cannot rule out the possibility
that such outcomes will
be material to the consolidated results of operations for a particular reporting period in the future.
Item 1A. Risk Factors.
In addition to the risk factors relating to M&T that were disclosed in response to Item 1A. to
Part I of Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, the following additional risk factors
exist specifically relating to the impact of the Wilmington Trust acquisition:
(a) The merger of M&T and Wilmington Trust and the integration of the companies may be more
difficult, costly or time consuming than expected. It is possible that the integration process
could result in the loss of key employees or disruption of ongoing business or inconsistencies in
standards, controls, procedures and policies that adversely affect M&Ts ability to maintain
relationships with customers and employees or achieve the
- 102 -
anticipated benefits of the merger. As
with any merger of banking institutions, there also may be business disruptions that cause M&T to
lose customers or cause customers to withdraw their deposits from M&Ts banking
subsidiaries. The success of the combined company following the merger may depend in large part on the ability to
integrate the two business models and cultures. If M&T is
not able to successfully integrate operations associated with the Wilmington Trust acquisition, the expected benefits of the merger may not be realized.
(b) M&T may fail to realize the cost savings estimated for the merger. M&T estimates that it
will achieve cost savings from the merger when the two companies have been fully integrated. While
M&T continues to be comfortable with these expectations, it is possible that the estimates of the
potential cost savings could turn out to be incorrect. The cost savings estimates also assume the
ability to combine the businesses of M&T and Wilmington Trust in a manner that permits those cost
savings to be realized. If the estimates turn out to be incorrect or M&T is not able to successfully combine
the two companies, the anticipated cost saving may not be fully realized or realized
at all, or may take longer to realize than expected.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.
|
|
(a) (b) Not applicable. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(d) Maximum |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(c) Total |
|
|
Number (or |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Approximate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Dollar Value) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(or Units) |
|
|
of Shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchased |
|
|
(or Units) |
|
|
|
(a) Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
as Part of |
|
|
that may yet |
|
|
|
Number |
|
|
(b) Average |
|
|
Publicly |
|
|
be Purchased |
|
|
|
of Shares |
|
|
Price Paid |
|
|
Announced |
|
|
Under the |
|
|
|
(or Units) |
|
|
per Share |
|
|
Plans or |
|
|
Plans or |
|
Period |
|
Purchased (1) |
|
|
(or Unit) |
|
|
Programs |
|
|
Programs (2) |
|
|
April 1 April 30, 2011 |
|
|
1,214 |
|
|
$ |
88.37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,181,500 |
|
May 1 May 31, 2011 |
|
|
1,031 |
|
|
|
87.62 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,181,500 |
|
June 1 June 30, 2011 |
|
|
698 |
|
|
|
88.09 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,181,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
2,943 |
|
|
$ |
88.04 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The total number of shares purchased during the periods indicated includes shares deemed
to have been received from employees who exercised stock options by attesting to previously
acquired common shares in satisfaction of the exercise price or shares received from employees
upon the vesting of restricted stock awards in satisfaction of applicable tax withholding
obligations, as is permitted under M&Ts stock-based compensation plans. |
|
(2) |
|
On February 22, 2007, M&T announced a program to purchase up to 5,000,000 shares of its
common stock. No shares were purchased under such program during the periods indicated. |
|
|
|
Item 3. |
|
Defaults Upon Senior Securities.
(Not applicable.) |
|
|
|
Item 4. |
|
(Removed and Reserved). |
|
|
|
Item 5. |
|
Other Information.
(None.) |
- 103 -
Item 6. Exhibits.
The following exhibits are filed as a part of this report.
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
No. |
|
|
3.1
|
|
Certificate of Amendment to Certificate of Incorporation with respect to Perpetual
6.875% Non-Cumulative Preferred Stock, Series D, dated May 26, 2011 (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 99.2 of M&T Bank Corporations Form 8-K dated May 26, 2011). |
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer under Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Filed herewith. |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer under Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Filed herewith. |
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer under 18 U.S.C. §1350 pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Filed herewith. |
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer under 18 U.S.C. §1350 pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Filed herewith. |
|
|
|
99.2
|
|
Amendment to Replacement Capital Covenant of M&T Bank Corporation, dated as
of May 27, 2011, amending the Replacement Capital Covenant, dated as of January 31,
2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.2 of M&T Bank Corporations Form 8-K
dated May 26, 2011). |
|
|
|
101.INS*
|
|
XBRL Instance Document. |
|
|
|
101.SCH*
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema. |
|
|
|
101.CAL*
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase. |
|
|
|
101.LAB*
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase. |
|
|
|
101.PRE*
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase. |
|
|
|
101.DEF*
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Definition Linkbase. |
|
|
|
* |
|
As provided in Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, this information is furnished and
not filed for purposes of Sections 11 and 12 of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section
18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. |
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
M&T BANK CORPORATION
|
|
Date: August 9, 2011 |
By: |
/s/ René F. Jones
|
|
|
|
René F. Jones |
|
|
|
Executive Vice President
and Chief Financial Officer |
|
- 104 -
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
No. |
|
|
3.1
|
|
Certificate of Amendment to Certificate of Incorporation with respect to Perpetual
6.875% Non-Cumulative Preferred Stock, Series D, dated May 26, 2011 (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 99.2 of M&T Bank Corporations Form 8-K dated May 26, 2011). |
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer under Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002. Filed herewith. |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer under Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002. Filed herewith. |
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer under 18 U.S.C. §1350 pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Filed herewith. |
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer under 18 U.S.C. §1350 pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Filed herewith. |
|
|
|
99.2
|
|
Amendment to Replacement Capital Covenant of M&T Bank Corporation, dated as of May 27,
2011, amending the Replacement Capital Covenant, dated as of January 31, 2008 (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 99.2 of M&T Bank Corporations Form 8-K dated May 26, 2011). |
|
|
|
101.INS*
|
|
XBRL Instance Document. |
|
|
|
101.SCH*
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema. |
|
|
|
101.CAL*
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase. |
|
|
|
101.LAB*
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase. |
|
|
|
101.PRE*
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase. |
|
|
|
101.DEF*
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Definition Linkbase. |
|
|
|
* |
|
As provided in Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, this information is furnished and not filed for
purposes of Sections 11 and 12 of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 18 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934. |
- 105 -
exv31w1
EXHIBIT 31.1
CERTIFICATIONS
I, Robert G. Wilmers, certify that:
1. |
|
I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of M&T Bank Corporation; |
|
2. |
|
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report; |
|
3. |
|
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report; |
|
4. |
|
The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: |
|
a) |
|
designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating
to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; |
|
b) |
|
designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over
financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance
regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements
for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; |
|
c) |
|
evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
and |
|
d) |
|
disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial
reporting. |
|
5. |
|
The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions): |
|
a) |
|
all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal
control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and |
|
b) |
|
any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting. |
Date: August 9, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ Robert G. Wilmers
|
|
|
|
Robert G. Wilmers |
|
|
|
Chairman of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer |
|
exv31w2
EXHIBIT 31.2
CERTIFICATIONS
I, René F. Jones, certify that:
1. |
|
I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of M&T Bank Corporation; |
|
2. |
|
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report; |
|
3. |
|
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report; |
|
4. |
|
The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: |
|
a) |
|
designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating
to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; |
|
b) |
|
designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over
financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance
regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements
for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; |
|
c) |
|
evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
and |
|
d) |
|
disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial
reporting. |
|
5. |
|
The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions): |
|
a) |
|
all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal
control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and |
|
b) |
|
any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting. |
Date: August 9, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ René F. Jones
|
|
|
|
René F. Jones |
|
|
|
Executive Vice President
and Chief Financial Officer |
|
exv32w1
EXHIBIT 32.1
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER UNDER 18 U.S.C. §1350
I, Robert G. Wilmers, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of M&T Bank Corporation,
certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:
|
(1) |
|
the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of M&T Bank Corporation for the quarterly period ended
June 30, 2011 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and |
|
|
(2) |
|
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
M&T Bank Corporation. |
The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 and is not being
filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Robert G. Wilmers
|
|
|
Robert G. Wilmers |
|
|
August 9, 2011 |
|
A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form
within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided
to M&T Bank Corporation and will be retained by M&T Bank Corporation and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
exv32w2
EXHIBIT 32.2
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER UNDER 18 U.S.C. §1350
I, René F. Jones, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of M&T Bank Corporation,
certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:
|
(1) |
|
the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of M&T Bank Corporation for the quarterly period ended
June 30, 2011 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and |
|
|
(2) |
|
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
M&T Bank Corporation. |
The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 and is not being
filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ René F. Jones |
|
|
René F. Jones |
|
|
August 9, 2011 |
|
A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form
within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided
to M&T Bank Corporation and will be retained by M&T Bank Corporation and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.