e10vq
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2009
or
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
Commission File Number 1-9861
M&T BANK CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
New York
|
|
16-0968385 |
(State or other jurisdiction of
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer |
incorporation or organization)
|
|
Identification No.) |
|
|
|
One M & T Plaza |
|
|
Buffalo, New York
|
|
14203 |
(Address of principal
executive offices)
|
|
(Zip Code) |
(716) 842-5445
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. þ Yes o No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). þ Yes o No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated
filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
(Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer þ
|
|
Accelerated filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
|
|
Smaller reporting company o |
|
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act). o Yes þ No
Number of shares of the registrants Common Stock, $0.50 par value, outstanding as of the
close of business on October 23, 2009: 118,091,387 shares.
M&T BANK CORPORATION
FORM 10-Q
For the Quarterly Period Ended September 30, 2009
- 2 -
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements.
M&T BANK CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET (Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
December 31, |
Dollars in thousands, except per share |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks |
|
$ |
1,356,508 |
|
|
|
1,546,804 |
|
Interest-bearing deposits at banks |
|
|
54,443 |
|
|
|
10,284 |
|
Federal funds sold |
|
|
17,206 |
|
|
|
21,347 |
|
Agreements to resell securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
90,000 |
|
Trading account |
|
|
497,064 |
|
|
|
617,821 |
|
Investment securities (includes pledged securities that can
be sold or repledged of $1,778,129 at September 30, 2009;
$1,870,097 at December 31, 2008) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available for sale (cost: $6,835,553 at September 30, 2009;
$7,656,635 at December 31, 2008) |
|
|
6,522,856 |
|
|
|
6,850,193 |
|
Held to maturity (fair value: $431,036 at September 30, 2009;
$394,752 at December 31, 2008) |
|
|
598,743 |
|
|
|
485,838 |
|
Other (fair value: $512,663 at September 30, 2009;
$583,176 at December 31, 2008) |
|
|
512,663 |
|
|
|
583,176 |
|
|
Total investment securities |
|
|
7,634,262 |
|
|
|
7,919,207 |
|
|
Loans and leases |
|
|
52,560,851 |
|
|
|
49,359,737 |
|
Unearned discount |
|
|
(357,079 |
) |
|
|
(359,274 |
) |
Allowance for credit losses |
|
|
(867,874 |
) |
|
|
(787,904 |
) |
|
Loans and leases, net |
|
|
51,335,898 |
|
|
|
48,212,559 |
|
|
Premises and equipment |
|
|
436,586 |
|
|
|
388,855 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
3,524,625 |
|
|
|
3,192,128 |
|
Core deposit and other intangible assets |
|
|
199,148 |
|
|
|
183,496 |
|
Accrued interest and other assets |
|
|
3,941,710 |
|
|
|
3,633,256 |
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
68,997,450 |
|
|
|
65,815,757 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest-bearing deposits |
|
$ |
12,730,083 |
|
|
|
8,856,114 |
|
NOW accounts |
|
|
1,047,824 |
|
|
|
1,141,308 |
|
Savings deposits |
|
|
23,000,354 |
|
|
|
19,488,918 |
|
Time deposits |
|
|
8,765,520 |
|
|
|
9,046,937 |
|
Deposits at foreign office |
|
|
1,318,070 |
|
|
|
4,047,986 |
|
|
Total deposits |
|
|
46,861,851 |
|
|
|
42,581,263 |
|
|
Federal funds purchased and agreements
to repurchase securities |
|
|
2,298,032 |
|
|
|
970,529 |
|
Other short-term borrowings |
|
|
629,236 |
|
|
|
2,039,206 |
|
Accrued interest and other liabilities |
|
|
1,241,576 |
|
|
|
1,364,879 |
|
Long-term borrowings |
|
|
10,354,392 |
|
|
|
12,075,149 |
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
61,385,087 |
|
|
|
59,031,026 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, par value $1.00, 1,000,000 shares authorized, 778,000 shares
issued and outstanding at September 30, 2009; 600,000 shares issued and
outstanding at December 31, 2008 (liquidation preference $1,000 per share) |
|
|
727,748 |
|
|
|
567,463 |
|
Common stock, $.50 par, 250,000,000 shares authorized,
120,396,611 shares issued |
|
|
60,198 |
|
|
|
60,198 |
|
Common stock issuable, 74,405 shares at September 30,
2009; 78,447 shares at December 31, 2008 |
|
|
4,291 |
|
|
|
4,617 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
2,448,843 |
|
|
|
2,897,907 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
5,035,808 |
|
|
|
5,062,754 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net |
|
|
(419,286 |
) |
|
|
(736,881 |
) |
Treasury stock common, at cost - 2,314,873 shares at
September 30, 2009; 10,031,302 shares at December 31, 2008 |
|
|
(245,239 |
) |
|
|
(1,071,327 |
) |
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
7,612,363 |
|
|
|
6,784,731 |
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
68,997,450 |
|
|
|
65,815,757 |
|
|
- 3 -
M&T BANK CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME (Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
September 30 |
|
September 30 |
In thousands, except per share |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
Interest income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans and leases, including fees |
|
$ |
599,859 |
|
|
|
684,281 |
|
|
$ |
1,728,422 |
|
|
|
2,160,755 |
|
Deposits at banks |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
91 |
|
Federal funds sold |
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
74 |
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
211 |
|
Agreements to resell securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
441 |
|
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
1,752 |
|
Trading account |
|
|
135 |
|
|
|
359 |
|
|
|
450 |
|
|
|
761 |
|
Investment securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fully taxable |
|
|
97,963 |
|
|
|
114,146 |
|
|
|
297,563 |
|
|
|
331,000 |
|
Exempt from federal taxes |
|
|
2,612 |
|
|
|
2,028 |
|
|
|
5,955 |
|
|
|
8,520 |
|
|
Total interest income |
|
|
700,593 |
|
|
|
801,354 |
|
|
|
2,032,528 |
|
|
|
2,503,090 |
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOW accounts |
|
|
288 |
|
|
|
655 |
|
|
|
861 |
|
|
|
2,302 |
|
Savings deposits |
|
|
22,076 |
|
|
|
58,917 |
|
|
|
90,360 |
|
|
|
185,856 |
|
Time deposits |
|
|
50,678 |
|
|
|
72,100 |
|
|
|
166,704 |
|
|
|
258,210 |
|
Deposits at foreign office |
|
|
481 |
|
|
|
18,709 |
|
|
|
2,038 |
|
|
|
79,157 |
|
Short-term borrowings |
|
|
1,764 |
|
|
|
28,155 |
|
|
|
6,127 |
|
|
|
132,388 |
|
Long-term borrowings |
|
|
77,651 |
|
|
|
134,579 |
|
|
|
269,409 |
|
|
|
391,456 |
|
|
Total interest expense |
|
|
152,938 |
|
|
|
313,115 |
|
|
|
535,499 |
|
|
|
1,049,369 |
|
|
Net interest income |
|
|
547,655 |
|
|
|
488,239 |
|
|
|
1,497,029 |
|
|
|
1,453,721 |
|
Provision for credit losses |
|
|
154,000 |
|
|
|
101,000 |
|
|
|
459,000 |
|
|
|
261,000 |
|
|
Net interest income after provision for credit losses |
|
|
393,655 |
|
|
|
387,239 |
|
|
|
1,038,029 |
|
|
|
1,192,721 |
|
|
Other income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage banking revenues |
|
|
48,169 |
|
|
|
38,002 |
|
|
|
157,385 |
|
|
|
116,291 |
|
Service charges on deposit accounts |
|
|
128,502 |
|
|
|
110,371 |
|
|
|
342,010 |
|
|
|
324,165 |
|
Trust income |
|
|
31,586 |
|
|
|
38,789 |
|
|
|
98,908 |
|
|
|
119,519 |
|
Brokerage services income |
|
|
14,329 |
|
|
|
16,218 |
|
|
|
43,215 |
|
|
|
48,902 |
|
Trading account and foreign exchange gains |
|
|
7,478 |
|
|
|
4,278 |
|
|
|
16,456 |
|
|
|
15,627 |
|
Gain (loss) on bank investment securities |
|
|
(56 |
) |
|
|
306 |
|
|
|
811 |
|
|
|
34,078 |
|
Total other-than-temporary impairment (OTTI) losses |
|
|
(64,232 |
) |
|
|
(152,579 |
) |
|
|
(202,737 |
) |
|
|
(158,325 |
) |
Portion of OTTI losses recognized in other
comprehensive income (before taxes) |
|
|
17,199 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
98,736 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net OTTI losses recognized in earnings |
|
|
(47,033 |
) |
|
|
(152,579 |
) |
|
|
(104,001 |
) |
|
|
(158,325 |
) |
|
Equity in earnings of Bayview Lending Group LLC |
|
|
(10,912 |
) |
|
|
(14,480 |
) |
|
|
(15,263 |
) |
|
|
(28,766 |
) |
Other revenues from operations |
|
|
106,163 |
|
|
|
72,812 |
|
|
|
242,695 |
|
|
|
226,071 |
|
|
Total other income |
|
|
278,226 |
|
|
|
113,717 |
|
|
|
782,216 |
|
|
|
697,562 |
|
|
Other expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries and employee benefits |
|
|
255,449 |
|
|
|
236,678 |
|
|
|
754,793 |
|
|
|
724,676 |
|
Equipment and net occupancy |
|
|
58,195 |
|
|
|
47,033 |
|
|
|
157,688 |
|
|
|
141,050 |
|
Printing, postage and supplies |
|
|
8,229 |
|
|
|
8,443 |
|
|
|
28,878 |
|
|
|
27,459 |
|
Amortization of core deposit and other intangible assets |
|
|
16,924 |
|
|
|
15,840 |
|
|
|
47,525 |
|
|
|
50,938 |
|
Deposit insurance |
|
|
21,124 |
|
|
|
1,522 |
|
|
|
76,617 |
|
|
|
4,595 |
|
Other costs of operations |
|
|
140,135 |
|
|
|
125,247 |
|
|
|
436,611 |
|
|
|
331,459 |
|
|
Total other expense |
|
|
500,056 |
|
|
|
434,763 |
|
|
|
1,502,112 |
|
|
|
1,280,177 |
|
|
Income before taxes |
|
|
171,825 |
|
|
|
66,193 |
|
|
|
318,133 |
|
|
|
610,106 |
|
Income taxes (benefit) |
|
|
44,161 |
|
|
|
(24,992 |
) |
|
|
75,060 |
|
|
|
156,460 |
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
127,664 |
|
|
|
91,185 |
|
|
$ |
243,073 |
|
|
|
453,646 |
|
|
Net income available to common shareholders |
|
$ |
113,894 |
|
|
|
91,185 |
|
|
$ |
209,062 |
|
|
|
453,646 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per common share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
.97 |
|
|
|
.83 |
|
|
$ |
1.84 |
|
|
|
4.12 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
.97 |
|
|
|
.82 |
|
|
|
1.84 |
|
|
|
4.09 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends per common share |
|
$ |
.70 |
|
|
|
.70 |
|
|
$ |
2.10 |
|
|
|
2.10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average common shares outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
117,370 |
|
|
|
110,265 |
|
|
|
113,701 |
|
|
|
110,158 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
117,547 |
|
|
|
110,807 |
|
|
|
113,800 |
|
|
|
111,000 |
|
- 4 -
M&T BANK CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS (Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended September 30 |
In thousands |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
Cash flows from operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
243,073 |
|
|
|
453,646 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash
provided by operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for credit losses |
|
|
459,000 |
|
|
|
261,000 |
|
Depreciation and amortization of premises and equipment |
|
|
43,050 |
|
|
|
39,918 |
|
Amortization of capitalized servicing rights |
|
|
46,997 |
|
|
|
49,322 |
|
Amortization of core deposit and other intangible assets |
|
|
47,525 |
|
|
|
50,938 |
|
Provision for deferred income taxes |
|
|
82,904 |
|
|
|
(56,157 |
) |
Asset write-downs |
|
|
131,822 |
|
|
|
161,763 |
|
Net gain on sales of assets |
|
|
(249 |
) |
|
|
(26,202 |
) |
Net change in accrued interest receivable, payable |
|
|
(5,154 |
) |
|
|
1,302 |
|
Net change in other accrued income and expense |
|
|
34,206 |
|
|
|
(1,111 |
) |
Net change in loans originated for sale |
|
|
8,144 |
|
|
|
433,929 |
|
Net change in trading account assets and liabilities |
|
|
(15,797 |
) |
|
|
(74,583 |
) |
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
1,075,521 |
|
|
|
1,293,765 |
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sales of investment securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available for sale |
|
|
7,159 |
|
|
|
57,350 |
|
Other |
|
|
115,336 |
|
|
|
87,782 |
|
Proceeds from maturities of investment securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available for sale |
|
|
1,803,946 |
|
|
|
1,608,085 |
|
Held to maturity |
|
|
76,084 |
|
|
|
60,922 |
|
Purchases of investment securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available for sale |
|
|
(68,724 |
) |
|
|
(761,381 |
) |
Held to maturity |
|
|
(25,289 |
) |
|
|
(176,673 |
) |
Other |
|
|
(2,886 |
) |
|
|
(173,994 |
) |
Net (increase) decrease in agreements to resell securities |
|
|
90,000 |
|
|
|
(90,000 |
) |
Net (increase) decrease in loans and leases |
|
|
513,519 |
|
|
|
(2,350,539 |
) |
Other investments, net |
|
|
(23,496 |
) |
|
|
(13,557 |
) |
Additions to capitalized servicing rights |
|
|
(320 |
) |
|
|
(22,261 |
) |
Capital expenditures, net |
|
|
(27,664 |
) |
|
|
(43,854 |
) |
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Banks and bank holding companies |
|
|
202,993 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other, net |
|
|
19,115 |
|
|
|
(141,409 |
) |
|
Net cash provided (used) by investing activities |
|
|
2,679,773 |
|
|
|
(1,959,529 |
) |
|
Cash flows from financing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in deposits |
|
|
(1,125,110 |
) |
|
|
1,239,933 |
|
Net decrease in short-term borrowings |
|
|
(260,488 |
) |
|
|
(2,892,263 |
) |
Proceeds from long-term borrowings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,850,010 |
|
Payments on long-term borrowings |
|
|
(2,301,894 |
) |
|
|
(1,676,725 |
) |
Dividends paid common |
|
|
(242,551 |
) |
|
|
(231,269 |
) |
Dividends paid preferred |
|
|
(21,890 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other, net |
|
|
2,202 |
|
|
|
(3,952 |
) |
|
Net cash provided (used) by financing activities |
|
|
(3,949,731 |
) |
|
|
285,734 |
|
|
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(194,437 |
) |
|
|
(380,030 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
1,568,151 |
|
|
|
1,767,547 |
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
1,373,714 |
|
|
|
1,387,517 |
|
|
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest received during the period |
|
$ |
2,042,092 |
|
|
|
2,570,574 |
|
Interest paid during the period |
|
|
525,657 |
|
|
|
1,071,672 |
|
Income taxes paid (refunded) during the period |
|
|
(8,157 |
) |
|
|
200,749 |
|
|
Supplemental schedule of noncash investing and financing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securitization of residential mortgage loans allocated to |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available for sale investment securities |
|
$ |
140,942 |
|
|
|
869,115 |
|
Capitalized servicing rights |
|
|
788 |
|
|
|
8,455 |
|
Real estate acquired in settlement of loans |
|
|
69,518 |
|
|
|
92,814 |
|
Investment securities available for sale transferred to held to maturity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
298,108 |
|
Acquisitions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets acquired (noncash) |
|
|
6,581,433 |
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities assumed |
|
|
6,318,998 |
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock issued |
|
|
155,779 |
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock issued |
|
|
272,824 |
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock options |
|
|
1,367 |
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock warrants |
|
|
6,467 |
|
|
|
|
|
- 5 -
M&T BANK CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY (Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common |
|
|
Additional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
comprehensive |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred |
|
|
Common |
|
|
stock |
|
|
paid-in |
|
|
Retained |
|
|
income (loss), |
|
|
Treasury |
|
|
|
|
In thousands, except per share |
|
stock |
|
|
stock |
|
|
issuable |
|
|
capital |
|
|
earnings |
|
|
net |
|
|
stock |
|
|
Total |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance January 1, 2008 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
60,198 |
|
|
|
4,776 |
|
|
|
2,848,752 |
|
|
|
4,815,585 |
|
|
|
(114,822 |
) |
|
|
(1,129,233 |
) |
|
|
6,485,256 |
|
Comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
453,646 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
453,646 |
|
Other comprehensive income,
net of tax and reclassification adjustments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized losses on investment
securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(345,758 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(345,758 |
) |
Unrealized losses on terminated
cash flow hedges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(459 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(459 |
) |
Defined benefit plans liablity adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,011 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,011 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
106,418 |
|
Repayment of management stock ownership
program receivable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
72 |
|
Stock-based compensation plans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock option and purchase plans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,356 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,913 |
|
|
|
39,269 |
|
Exercises |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(21,893 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,756 |
|
|
|
15,863 |
|
Directors stock plan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(384 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,393 |
|
|
|
1,009 |
|
Deferred compensation plans, net,
including dividend equivalents |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(150 |
) |
|
|
(408 |
) |
|
|
(163 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
787 |
|
|
|
66 |
|
Common stock cash dividends -
$2.10 per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(231,269 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(231,269 |
) |
|
Balance September 30, 2008 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
60,198 |
|
|
|
4,626 |
|
|
|
2,861,495 |
|
|
|
5,037,799 |
|
|
|
(462,050 |
) |
|
|
(1,085,384 |
) |
|
|
6,416,684 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance January 1, 2009 |
|
$ |
567,463 |
|
|
|
60,198 |
|
|
|
4,617 |
|
|
|
2,897,907 |
|
|
|
5,062,754 |
|
|
|
(736,881 |
) |
|
|
(1,071,327 |
) |
|
|
6,784,731 |
|
Comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
243,073 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
243,073 |
|
Other comprehensive income,
net of tax and reclassification adjustments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gains on investment
securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
309,150 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
309,150 |
|
Unrealized gains on terminated
cash flow hedges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,627 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,627 |
|
Defined benefit plans liability adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,818 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,818 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
560,668 |
|
Acquisition of Provident Bankshares Corporation: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock issued |
|
|
155,779 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
155,779 |
|
Common stock issued |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(348,080 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
620,904 |
|
|
|
272,824 |
|
Common stock options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,367 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,367 |
|
Common stock warrants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,467 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,467 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock to defined benefit
pension plan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(51,417 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
95,706 |
|
|
|
44,289 |
|
Preferred stock cash dividends |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(21,890 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(21,890 |
) |
Amortization of preferred stock discount |
|
|
4,506 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,506 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repayment of management stock ownership
program receivable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
195 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
195 |
|
Stock-based compensation plans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock option and purchase plans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(31,677 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
74,642 |
|
|
|
42,965 |
|
Exercises |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(24,335 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,751 |
|
|
|
7,416 |
|
Directors stock plan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,082 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,050 |
|
|
|
968 |
|
Deferred compensation plans, net,
including dividend equivalents |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(326 |
) |
|
|
(502 |
) |
|
|
(152 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,035 |
|
|
|
55 |
|
Common stock cash dividends -
$2.10 per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(243,471 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(243,471 |
) |
|
Balance September 30, 2009 |
|
$ |
727,748 |
|
|
|
60,198 |
|
|
|
4,291 |
|
|
|
2,448,843 |
|
|
|
5,035,808 |
|
|
|
(419,286 |
) |
|
|
(245,239 |
) |
|
|
7,612,363 |
|
|
CONSOLIDATED SUMMARY OF CHANGES IN ALLOWANCE FOR CREDIT LOSSES (Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended September 30 |
|
In thousands |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Beginning balance |
|
$ |
787,904 |
|
|
|
759,439 |
|
Provision for credit losses |
|
|
459,000 |
|
|
|
261,000 |
|
Allowance related to loans sold or securitized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(525 |
) |
Net charge-offs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charge-offs |
|
|
(409,169 |
) |
|
|
(267,912 |
) |
Recoveries |
|
|
30,139 |
|
|
|
28,681 |
|
|
Total net charge-offs |
|
|
(379,030 |
) |
|
|
(239,231 |
) |
|
Ending balance |
|
$ |
867,874 |
|
|
|
780,683 |
|
|
- 6 -
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. Significant accounting policies
The consolidated financial statements of M&T Bank Corporation (M&T) and subsidiaries (the
Company) were compiled in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) using
the accounting policies set forth in note 1 of Notes to Financial Statements included in the 2008
Annual Report, except as described below. In the opinion of management, all adjustments necessary
for a fair presentation have been made and were all of a normal recurring nature. Subsequent
events have been evaluated for their potential impact on the financial statements through November
4, 2009, which is the date the financial statements were issued.
2. Acquisitions
On August 28, 2009, M&T Bank, M&Ts principal banking subsidiary, entered into a purchase and
assumption agreement with the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) to assume all of the
deposits and acquire certain assets of Bradford Bank (Bradford), Baltimore, Maryland. As part of
the transaction, M&T Bank entered into a loss-share arrangement with the FDIC whereby M&T Bank will
be reimbursed by the FDIC for most losses it incurs on the acquired loan portfolio. The
transaction has been accounted for using the acquisition method of accounting and, accordingly,
assets acquired and liabilities assumed were recorded at estimated fair value on the acquisition
date. Assets acquired totaled approximately $469 million, including $302 million of loans, and
liabilities assumed aggregated $440 million, including $361 million of deposits. In accordance
with GAAP, M&T Bank recorded an after-tax gain on the transaction of $18 million ($29 million
before taxes) during the recent quarter. There was no goodwill or other intangible assets recorded
in connection with this transaction. The Bradford acquisition transaction did not have a
material impact on the Companys statement of condition nor is it expected to have a material impact on the Companys results of operations.
On May 23, 2009, M&T acquired all of the outstanding common stock of Provident Bankshares
Corporation (Provident), a bank holding company based in Baltimore, Maryland, in a
stock-for-stock transaction. Provident Bank, Providents banking subsidiary, was merged into M&T
Bank on that date. The results of operations acquired in the Provident transaction have been
included in the Companys financial results since May 23, 2009. Provident common shareholders
received .171625 shares of M&T common stock in exchange for each share of Provident common stock,
resulting in M&T issuing a total of 5,838,308 common shares with an acquisition date fair value of
$273 million. In addition, based on the merger agreement, outstanding and unexercised options to
purchase Provident common stock were converted into options to purchase the common stock of M&T.
Those options had an estimated fair value of $1 million. In total, the purchase price was
approximately $274 million based on the fair value on the acquisition date of M&T common stock
exchanged and the options to purchase M&T common stock. Holders of Providents preferred stock
were issued shares of new Series B and Series C Preferred Stock of M&T having substantially
identical terms. That preferred stock and warrants to purchase common stock associated with the
Series C Preferred Stock added $162 million to M&Ts stockholders equity.
The Provident transaction has been accounted for using the acquisition method of accounting
and, accordingly, assets acquired, liabilities assumed and consideration exchanged were recorded at
estimated fair value on the acquisition date. Assets acquired totaled $6.3 billion, including $4.0
billion of loans and leases (including approximately $1.7 billion of commercial real estate loans,
$1.4 billion of consumer loans, $700 million of commercial loans and leases and $300 million of
residential real estate loans) and $1.0 billion of investment securities.
- 7 -
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED
2. Acquisitions, continued
Liabilities assumed were $5.9 billion, including $5.1 billion of deposits. The transaction added
$436 million to M&Ts stockholders equity, including $280 million of common equity and $156
million of preferred equity. In connection with the acquisition, the Company recorded $332 million
of goodwill and $63 million of core deposit intangible. The core deposit intangible is being
amortized over seven years using an accelerated method. The acquisition of Provident expanded the
Companys presence in the Mid-Atlantic area, gave the Company the second largest deposit share in
Maryland, and tripled the Companys presence in Virginia.
In many cases, determining the fair value of the acquired assets and assumed liabilities
required the Company to estimate cash flows expected to result from those assets and liabilities
and to discount those cash flows at appropriate rates of interest. The most significant of these
determinations related to the fair valuation of acquired loans. For such loans, the excess of cash
flows expected at acquisition over the estimated fair value is recognized as interest income over
the remaining lives of the loans. The difference between contractually required payments at
acquisition and the cash flows expected to be collected at acquisition reflects the impact of
estimated credit losses and other factors, such as prepayments. In accordance with GAAP, there was
no carry over of Providents previously established allowance for credit losses. Subsequent
decreases in the expected cash flows will require the Company to evaluate the need for additions to
the Companys allowance for credit losses. Subsequent improvements in expected cash flows will
result in the recognition of additional interest income over the then remaining lives of the loans.
In conjunction with the Provident acquisition, the acquired loan portfolio was accounted for
at fair value as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 23, 2009 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Contractually required principal
and interest at acquisition |
|
$ |
5,465,167 |
|
Contractual cash flows not
expected to be collected |
|
|
(832,115 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Expected cash flows at acquisition |
|
|
4,633,052 |
|
Interest component of
expected cash flows |
|
|
(595,685 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Basis in acquired loans at
acquisition estimated fair value |
|
$ |
4,037,367 |
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income on acquired loans for the third quarter of 2009 and for the period from date
of acquisition to September 30, 2009 was approximately $44 million and $63 million, respectively.
The outstanding principal balance and the carrying amount of these loans that is included in the
consolidated balance sheet at September 30, 2009 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
Outstanding principal balance |
|
$ |
4,073,669 |
|
Carrying amount |
|
|
3,826,534 |
|
Receivables (including loans and investment securities) obtained in the acquisition of
Provident for which there is specific evidence of credit deterioration and for which it was
probable that the Company would be unable to collect all contractually required principal and
interest payments represent less than .25% of the Companys assets and, accordingly, are not
considered material.
- 8 -
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED
2. Acquisitions, continued
In connection with the acquisition of Provident, goodwill of $332 million was calculated after
recording all other acquired assets and liabilities at estimated fair value. In managements
opinion, that goodwill represents the inherent long-term value expected from the business
opportunities and synergies created from combining Provident with the Company.
The consideration paid for Providents common equity and the amounts of acquired identifiable
assets and liabilities and preferred equity assumed as of the acquisition date was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Purchase price: |
|
|
|
|
Value of: |
|
|
|
|
Common shares issued
(5,838,308 shares) |
|
$ |
272,824 |
|
Stock options |
|
|
1,367 |
|
Fractional common
shares paid in cash |
|
|
117 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total purchase price |
|
|
274,308 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Identifiable assets: |
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks |
|
|
144,126 |
|
Investment securities |
|
|
1,039,350 |
|
Loans and leases |
|
|
4,037,367 |
|
Core deposit intangible |
|
|
63,177 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
698,860 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
5,982,880 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and equity: |
|
|
|
|
Deposits |
|
|
5,060,546 |
|
Short-term borrowings |
|
|
176,515 |
|
Long-term borrowings |
|
|
580,740 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
61,022 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
5,878,823 |
|
Preferred stock and common stock warrants |
|
|
162,246 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
6,041,069 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net liabilities and preferred
equity assumed |
|
|
58,189 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill resulting from acquisition |
|
$ |
332,497 |
|
|
|
|
|
None of the goodwill recognized will be deductible for income tax purposes. Changes in
goodwill in the Companys consolidated balance sheet from December 31, 2008 to September 30, 2009
were attributable to the acquisition of Provident. As described in note 12, the Company does not
allocate goodwill to its reportable segments when compiling the assets associated with those
segments. The Company does, however, allocate goodwill to segments for purposes of periodically
testing
- 9 -
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED
2. Acquisitions, continued
goodwill for impairment. That allocation of goodwill to the Companys segments is as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provident |
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
acquisition |
|
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Business Banking |
|
$ |
683,137 |
|
|
|
65,770 |
|
|
|
748,907 |
|
Commercial Banking |
|
|
885,290 |
|
|
|
22,234 |
|
|
|
907,524 |
|
Commercial Real Estate |
|
|
274,506 |
|
|
|
74,691 |
|
|
|
349,197 |
|
Discretionary Portfolio |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential Mortgage
Banking |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retail Banking |
|
|
974,602 |
|
|
|
169,802 |
|
|
|
1,144,404 |
|
All Other |
|
|
374,593 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
374,593 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
3,192,128 |
|
|
|
332,497 |
|
|
|
3,524,625 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table discloses the impact of Provident (excluding the impact of merger-related
expenses noted below) since the acquisition on May 23, 2009 through the end of the third quarter of
2009. The table also presents certain pro forma information for 2009 as if Provident had been
acquired on January 1, 2009 and for 2008 as if Provident had been acquired on January 1, 2008.
These results combine the historical results of Provident into the Companys consolidated statement
of income and, while certain adjustments were made for the estimated impact of certain fair
valuation adjustments and other acquisition-related activity, they are not indicative
of what would have occurred had the acquisition taken place on the indicated dates. In particular,
no adjustments have been made to eliminate the amount of Providents provision for credit losses of
$42 million in 2009 and $16 million in 2008 or the impact of other-than-temporary impairment losses
recognized by Provident of $87 million in 2009 and $88 million in 2008 that would not have been
necessary had the acquired loans and investment securities been recorded at fair value as of the
beginning of each year. Furthermore, expenses related to systems conversions and other costs of
integration are included in the 2009 periods in which such costs were incurred. Additionally, the
Company expects to achieve further operating cost savings and other business synergies as a result
of the acquisition which are not reflected in the pro forma amounts that follow.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual since |
|
Pro forma |
|
|
acquisition |
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
through |
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
|
(in thousands) |
Total revenues |
|
$ |
116,016 |
|
|
|
2,864,760 |
|
|
|
3,449,661 |
|
Net income |
|
|
18,583 |
|
|
|
157,653 |
|
|
|
440,657 |
|
Merger-related expenses associated with the acquisition of Provident and with the Bradford
transaction were $14 million and $83 million during the three- and nine-month periods ended
September 30, 2009, respectively. Such expenses were for professional services and other temporary
help fees associated with the conversion of systems and/or integration of operations; costs related
to branch and office consolidations; costs related to termination of existing Provident contractual
arrangements for various services; initial marketing and promotion expenses designed to introduce
M&T Bank to its new customers; severance and incentive compensation costs; travel costs; and
printing, supplies and other costs of commencing operations in new markets and offices. The
Company expects to incur additional merger-related expenses.
As of September 30, 2009, the remaining unpaid portion of merger-related
expenses was $26 million.
- 10 -
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED
2. Acquisitions, continued
A summary of merger-related expenses associated with the Bradford and Provident acquisitions
included in the consolidated statement of income follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Salaries and employee benefits |
|
$ |
870 |
|
|
|
9,649 |
|
Equipment and net occupancy |
|
|
1,845 |
|
|
|
2,430 |
|
Printing, postage and supplies |
|
|
629 |
|
|
|
3,444 |
|
Other costs of operations |
|
|
10,666 |
|
|
|
67,370 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
14,010 |
|
|
|
82,893 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3. Investment securities
The amortized cost and estimated fair value of investment securities were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
unrealized |
|
|
unrealized |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
|
cost |
|
|
gains |
|
|
losses |
|
|
fair value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities available
for sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury and federal agencies |
|
$ |
112,718 |
|
|
|
2,084 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
$ |
114,783 |
|
Obligations of states and political
subdivisions |
|
|
66,633 |
|
|
|
1,864 |
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
68,452 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Government issued or guaranteed |
|
|
3,475,366 |
|
|
|
148,308 |
|
|
|
682 |
|
|
|
3,622,992 |
|
Privately issued residential |
|
|
2,596,799 |
|
|
|
10,086 |
|
|
|
422,648 |
|
|
|
2,184,237 |
|
Privately issued commercial |
|
|
34,825 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,284 |
|
|
|
23,541 |
|
Collateralized debt obligations |
|
|
109,547 |
|
|
|
26,875 |
|
|
|
5,085 |
|
|
|
131,337 |
|
Other debt securities |
|
|
298,740 |
|
|
|
13,416 |
|
|
|
70,990 |
|
|
|
241,166 |
|
Equity securities |
|
|
140,925 |
|
|
|
6,776 |
|
|
|
11,353 |
|
|
|
136,348 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,835,553 |
|
|
|
209,409 |
|
|
|
522,106 |
|
|
|
6,522,856 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities held
to maturity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obligations of states and political
subdivisions |
|
|
213,380 |
|
|
|
3,926 |
|
|
|
113 |
|
|
|
217,193 |
|
Privately issued residential
mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
374,190 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
171,520 |
|
|
|
202,670 |
|
Other debt securities |
|
|
11,173 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,173 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
598,743 |
|
|
|
3,926 |
|
|
|
171,633 |
|
|
|
431,036 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other securities |
|
|
512,663 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
512,663 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
7,946,959 |
|
|
|
213,335 |
|
|
|
693,739 |
|
|
$ |
7,466,555 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- 11 -
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED
3. Investment securities, continued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
unrealized |
|
|
unrealized |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
|
cost |
|
|
gains |
|
|
losses |
|
|
fair value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities available
for sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury and federal agencies |
|
$ |
290,893 |
|
|
|
6,203 |
|
|
|
383 |
|
|
$ |
296,713 |
|
Obligations of states and political
subdivisions |
|
|
70,425 |
|
|
|
1,641 |
|
|
|
303 |
|
|
|
71,763 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Government issued or guaranteed |
|
|
3,525,196 |
|
|
|
93,578 |
|
|
|
5,994 |
|
|
|
3,612,780 |
|
Privately issued residential |
|
|
3,104,209 |
|
|
|
484 |
|
|
|
778,139 |
|
|
|
2,326,554 |
|
Privately issued commercial |
|
|
49,231 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,185 |
|
|
|
41,046 |
|
Collateralized debt obligations |
|
|
18,088 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,592 |
|
|
|
2,496 |
|
Other debt securities |
|
|
245,685 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
77,601 |
|
|
|
168,102 |
|
Equity securities |
|
|
352,908 |
|
|
|
581 |
|
|
|
22,750 |
|
|
|
330,739 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,656,635 |
|
|
|
102,505 |
|
|
|
908,947 |
|
|
|
6,850,193 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities held
to maturity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obligations of states and political
subdivisions |
|
|
63,822 |
|
|
|
1,715 |
|
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
65,466 |
|
Privately issued residential
mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
411,847 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
92,730 |
|
|
|
319,117 |
|
Other debt securities |
|
|
10,169 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,169 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
485,838 |
|
|
|
1,715 |
|
|
|
92,801 |
|
|
|
394,752 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other securities |
|
|
583,176 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
583,176 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
8,725,649 |
|
|
|
104,220 |
|
|
|
1,001,748 |
|
|
$ |
7,828,121 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross realized gains on investment securities were $4 thousand and $365 thousand during
the three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, and $1 million and $34 million
during the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Gross realized
losses on investment securities were $60 thousand and $59 thousand during the third quarters of
2009 and 2008, respectively, and $462 thousand and $257 thousand during the nine-month periods
ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Effective January 1, 2009, the Company adopted
new GAAP related to the recognition and presentation of other-than-temporary impairments of
investment securities. In accordance with GAAP, the Company recognized $47 million and $104
million of pre-tax other-than-temporary impairment losses during the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2009, respectively, related primarily to certain privately issued residential
mortgage-backed securities. The impairment charges were recognized in light of deterioration of
housing values in the residential real estate market and a rise in delinquencies and charge-offs of
underlying mortgage loans collateralizing those securities. Approximately $3 million of impairment
charges recognized in the third quarter of 2009 related to securities backed by trust preferred
securities issued by financial institutions. The other-than-temporary impairment losses recognized
were net of $17 million and $99 million of unrealized losses classified in accumulated other
comprehensive income for the same securities for the three and nine months ended September 30,
2009, respectively. The other-than-temporary impairment losses represent managements estimate of
credit losses inherent in the securities considering projected cash flows using assumptions of
delinquency rates, loss severities, and other estimates of future collateral performance.
Other-than-temporary impairment losses on investment securities of $153 million and $158 million
were recognized by the Company for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, primarily
related to its preferred stock holdings of the Federal National Mortgage Association and the
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation. The effect of the adoption of the new accounting
requirements on debt securities previously reported as other-than-temporarily impaired was not
material
- 12 -
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED
3. Investment securities, continued
and, therefore, the Company did not record a transition adjustment as of January 1, 2009. Changes
in credit losses during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 associated with debt
securities for which other-than-temporary impairment losses have been previously recognized in
earnings follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt securities |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Estimated credit losses as
of June 30, 2009 |
|
$ |
205,918 |
|
Additions for credit losses
not previously recognized |
|
|
47,033 |
|
Reductions for increases in
cash flows |
|
|
(254 |
) |
Reductions for realized
losses |
|
|
(425 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Estimated credit losses as
of September 30, 2009 |
|
$ |
252,272 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated credit losses as
of January 1, 2009 |
|
$ |
155,967 |
|
Additions for credit losses
not previously recognized |
|
|
104,001 |
|
Reductions for increases in
cash flows |
|
|
(1,201 |
) |
Reductions for realized
losses |
|
|
(6,495 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Estimated credit losses as
of September 30, 2009 |
|
$ |
252,272 |
|
|
|
|
|
At September 30, 2009, the amortized cost and estimated fair value of debt securities by
contractual maturity were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
|
cost |
|
|
fair value |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Debt securities available for sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due in one year or less |
|
$ |
44,391 |
|
|
|
44,872 |
|
Due after one year through five years |
|
|
90,344 |
|
|
|
92,599 |
|
Due after five years through ten years |
|
|
41,956 |
|
|
|
43,309 |
|
Due after ten years |
|
|
410,947 |
|
|
|
374,958 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
587,638 |
|
|
|
555,738 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities available
for sale |
|
|
6,106,990 |
|
|
|
5,830,770 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
6,694,628 |
|
|
|
6,386,508 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt securities held to maturity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due in one year or less |
|
$ |
44,206 |
|
|
|
44,441 |
|
Due after one year through five years |
|
|
7,559 |
|
|
|
7,957 |
|
Due after five years through ten years |
|
|
103,665 |
|
|
|
105,813 |
|
Due after ten years |
|
|
69,123 |
|
|
|
70,155 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
224,553 |
|
|
|
228,366 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities held
to maturity |
|
|
374,190 |
|
|
|
202,670 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
598,743 |
|
|
|
431,036 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- 13 -
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED
3. Investment securities, continued
A summary of investment securities that as of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 had
been in a continuous unrealized loss position for less than twelve months and those that had been
in a continuous unrealized loss position for twelve months or longer follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than 12 months |
|
|
12 months or more |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
Fair value |
|
|
losses |
|
|
Fair value |
|
|
losses |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury and federal agencies |
|
$ |
2,302 |
|
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
568 |
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
Obligations of states and political
subdivisions |
|
|
4,792 |
|
|
|
(65 |
) |
|
|
4,640 |
|
|
|
(93 |
) |
Mortgage-backed securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Government issued or guaranteed |
|
|
37,865 |
|
|
|
(197 |
) |
|
|
24,771 |
|
|
|
(485 |
) |
Privately issued residential |
|
|
62,998 |
|
|
|
(40,268 |
) |
|
|
1,928,822 |
|
|
|
(553,900 |
) |
Privately issued commercial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,541 |
|
|
|
(11,284 |
) |
Collateralized debt obligations |
|
|
4,374 |
|
|
|
(575 |
) |
|
|
4,581 |
|
|
|
(4,510 |
) |
Other debt securities |
|
|
10,363 |
|
|
|
(458 |
) |
|
|
151,112 |
|
|
|
(70,532 |
) |
Equity securities |
|
|
4,148 |
|
|
|
(1,489 |
) |
|
|
23,037 |
|
|
|
(9,864 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
126,842 |
|
|
|
(43,065 |
) |
|
|
2,161,072 |
|
|
|
(650,674 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury and federal agencies |
|
$ |
6,660 |
|
|
|
(383 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obligations of states and political
subdivisions |
|
|
26,456 |
|
|
|
(315 |
) |
|
|
2,182 |
|
|
|
(59 |
) |
Mortgage-backed securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Government issued or guaranteed |
|
|
392,780 |
|
|
|
(4,962 |
) |
|
|
175,943 |
|
|
|
(1,032 |
) |
Privately issued residential |
|
|
2,173,593 |
|
|
|
(629,321 |
) |
|
|
460,355 |
|
|
|
(241,548 |
) |
Privately issued commercial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,046 |
|
|
|
(8,185 |
) |
Collateralized debt obligations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,221 |
) |
|
|
1,520 |
|
|
|
(13,397 |
) |
Other debt securities |
|
|
102,882 |
|
|
|
(15,563 |
) |
|
|
60,902 |
|
|
|
(62,012 |
) |
Equity securities |
|
|
37,905 |
|
|
|
(22,720 |
) |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
(30 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
2,740,276 |
|
|
|
(675,485 |
) |
|
|
741,957 |
|
|
|
(326,263 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company owned 473 individual investment securities with aggregate gross unrealized
losses of $694 million at September 30, 2009. Approximately $594 million of the unrealized losses
pertain to privately issued residential mortgage-backed securities with a cost basis of $2.6
billion. The Company also had $73 million of unrealized losses on trust preferred securities issued
by financial institutions and securities backed by trust preferred securities issued by financial
institutions and other entities having a cost basis of $239 million. Based on a review of each of
the securities in the investment securities portfolio at September 30, 2009, with the exception of
the aforementioned securities for which other-than-temporary impairment losses were recognized, the
Company concluded that it expected to recover the amortized cost basis of its investment. As of
September 30, 2009, the Company does not intend to sell nor is it anticipated that it would be
required to sell any of its impaired investment securities. At September 30, 2009, the Company has
not identified events or changes in circumstances which may have a significant adverse effect on
the fair value of the $513 million of cost method investment securities.
4. Borrowings
The Company had $1.2 billion of fixed and floating rate junior subordinated deferrable interest
debentures (Junior Subordinated Debentures) outstanding at September 30, 2009 which are held by
various trusts that were issued in connection with the issuance by those trusts of preferred
capital securities (Capital Securities) and common securities (Common Securities). The
proceeds
- 14 -
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED
4. Borrowings, continued
from the issuances of the Capital Securities and the Common Securities were used by the trusts to
purchase the Junior Subordinated Debentures. The Common Securities of each of those trusts are
wholly owned by M&T and are the only class of each trusts securities possessing general voting
powers. The Capital Securities represent preferred undivided interests in the assets of the
corresponding trust. Under the Federal Reserve Boards current risk-based capital guidelines, the
Capital Securities are includable in M&Ts Tier 1 capital. As a result of the acquisition of
Provident, M&T assumed $133 million of Junior Subordinated Debentures that mature at various dates
from 2028 to 2033.
Holders of the Capital Securities receive preferential cumulative cash distributions unless
M&T exercises its right to extend the payment of interest on the Junior Subordinated Debentures as
allowed by the terms of each such debenture, in which case payment of distributions on the
respective Capital Securities will be deferred for comparable periods. During an extended interest
period, M&T may not pay dividends or distributions on, or repurchase, redeem or acquire any shares
of its capital stock. In the event of an extended interest period exceeding twenty quarterly
periods for $350 million of Junior Subordinated Debentures due January 31, 2068, M&T must fund the
payment of accrued and unpaid interest through an alternative payment mechanism, which requires M&T
to issue common stock, non-cumulative perpetual preferred stock or warrants to purchase common
stock until M&T has raised an amount of eligible proceeds at least equal to the aggregate amount of
accrued and unpaid deferred interest on the Junior Subordinated Debentures due January 31, 2068.
In general, the agreements governing the Capital Securities, in the aggregate, provide a full,
irrevocable and unconditional guarantee by M&T of the payment of distributions on, the redemption
of, and any liquidation distribution with respect to the Capital Securities. The obligations under
such guarantee and the Capital Securities are subordinate and junior in right of payment to all
senior indebtedness of M&T.
The Capital Securities will remain outstanding until the Junior Subordinated Debentures are
repaid at maturity, are redeemed prior to maturity or are distributed in liquidation to the Trusts.
The Capital Securities are mandatorily redeemable in whole, but not in part, upon repayment at the
stated maturity dates (ranging from 2027 to 2068) of the Junior Subordinated Debentures or the
earlier redemption of the Junior Subordinated Debentures in whole upon the occurrence of one or
more events set forth in the indentures relating to the Capital Securities, and in whole or in part
at any time after an optional redemption prior to contractual maturity contemporaneously with the
optional redemption of the related Junior Subordinated Debentures in whole or in part, subject to
possible regulatory approval. In connection with the issuance of 8.50% Enhanced Trust Preferred
Securities associated with $350 million of Junior Subordinated Debentures maturing in 2068, M&T
entered into a replacement capital covenant that provides that neither M&T nor any of its
subsidiaries will repay, redeem or purchase any of the Junior Subordinated Debentures due January
31, 2068 or the 8.50% Enhanced Trust Preferred Securities prior to January 31, 2048, with certain
limited exceptions, except to the extent that, during the 180 days prior to the date of that
repayment, redemption or purchase, M&T and its subsidiaries have received proceeds from the sale of
qualifying securities that (i) have equity-like characteristics that are the same as, or more
equity-like than, the applicable characteristics of the 8.50% Enhanced Trust Preferred Securities
or the Junior Subordinated Debentures due January 31, 2068, as applicable, at the time of
repayment, redemption or purchase, and (ii) M&T has obtained the prior approval of the Federal
Reserve Board, if required.
On June 30, 2009, M&T retired $12 million of Junior Subordinated Debentures for which
Provident had been the owner of the related Capital Securities.
- 15 -
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED
4. Borrowings, continued
Including the unamortized portions of purchase accounting adjustments to reflect estimated
fair value at the acquisition dates of the Common Securities of various trusts and reflecting the
noted cancellation of Junior Subordinated Debentures on June 30, 2009, the Junior Subordinated
Debentures associated with Capital Securities had financial statement carrying values of $1.2
billion and $1.1 billion as of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively.
5. Stockholders equity
M&T is authorized to issue 1,000,000 shares of preferred stock with a $1.00 par value per share.
Preferred shares outstanding rank senior to common shares both as to dividends and liquidation
preference, but have no general voting rights.
Issued and outstanding preferred stock of M&T is presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares |
|
Carrying |
|
Carrying |
|
|
issued and |
|
value |
|
value |
|
|
outstanding |
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
(dollars in thousands) |
Series A (a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed Rate Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series A,
$1,000 liquidation preference
per share, 600,000 shares
authorized |
|
|
600,000 |
|
|
$ |
571,125 |
|
|
|
567,463 |
|
Series B (b) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series B Mandatory Convertible Non-cumulative Preferred
Stock, $1,000 liquidation
preference per share, 26,500
shares authorized |
|
|
26,500 |
|
|
|
26,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
Series C (a)(c) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed Rate Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series C,
$1,000 liquidation preference
per share, 151,500 shares
authorized |
|
|
151,500 |
|
|
|
130,123 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Shares were issued as part of the Troubled Asset Relief Program Capital Purchase
Program of the U.S. Department of Treasury (U.S. Treasury). Cash proceeds were allocated
between the preferred stock and a ten-year warrant to purchase M&T common stock (Series A
1,218,522 shares, Series C 407,542 shares). Dividends, if declared, will accrue and be
paid quarterly at a rate of 5% per year for the first five years following the original 2008
issuance dates and thereafter at a rate of 9% per year. |
|
(b) |
|
Shares were assumed in the Provident acquisition and a new Series B Preferred Stock was
designated. In the aggregate, the shares of Series B Preferred Stock will automatically
convert into 433,148 shares of M&T common stock on April 1, 2011, but shareholders may elect
to convert their preferred shares at any time prior to that date. Dividends, if declared, are
payable quarterly in arrears at a rate of 10% per year. |
|
(c) |
|
Shares were assumed in the Provident acquisition and a new Series C Preferred Stock was
designated. |
- 16 -
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED
6. Pension plans and other postretirement benefits
The Company provides defined benefit pension and other postretirement benefits (including health
care and life insurance benefits) to qualified retired employees. Net periodic defined benefit
cost for defined benefit plans consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
Pension |
|
|
postretirement |
|
|
|
benefits |
|
|
benefits |
|
|
|
Three months ended September 30 |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
4,935 |
|
|
|
4,852 |
|
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
140 |
|
Interest cost on projected benefit
obligation |
|
|
11,910 |
|
|
|
10,636 |
|
|
|
828 |
|
|
|
1,008 |
|
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
(11,963 |
) |
|
|
(11,523 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of prior service cost |
|
|
(1,640 |
) |
|
|
(1,640 |
) |
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
69 |
|
Amortization of net actuarial loss |
|
|
2,424 |
|
|
|
986 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic benefit cost |
|
$ |
5,666 |
|
|
|
3,311 |
|
|
|
972 |
|
|
|
1,227 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
Pension |
|
|
postretirement |
|
|
|
benefits |
|
|
benefits |
|
|
|
Nine months ended September 30 |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
14,548 |
|
|
|
14,557 |
|
|
|
265 |
|
|
|
419 |
|
Interest cost on projected benefit
obligation |
|
|
34,189 |
|
|
|
31,908 |
|
|
|
2,475 |
|
|
|
3,025 |
|
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
(35,014 |
) |
|
|
(34,570 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of prior service cost |
|
|
(4,919 |
) |
|
|
(4,919 |
) |
|
|
182 |
|
|
|
207 |
|
Amortization of net actuarial loss |
|
|
7,273 |
|
|
|
2,957 |
|
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic benefit cost |
|
$ |
16,077 |
|
|
|
9,933 |
|
|
|
2,907 |
|
|
|
3,682 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expense incurred in connection with the Companys defined contribution pension and retirement
savings plans totaled $8,061,000 and $7,758,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2009 and
2008, respectively, and $27,166,000 and $26,075,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2009
and 2008, respectively. The Company is not required to make any minimum contributions to the
qualified defined benefit pension plan in 2009, however, during the second quarter of 2009 the
Company elected to contribute to that plan 900,000 shares of common stock of M&T having a fair
value of $44 million.
- 17 -
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED
7. Earnings per common share
The computations of basic earnings per common share follow:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
|
September 30 |
|
|
September 30 |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(in thousands, except per share) |
|
Income available to common
stockholders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
127,664 |
|
|
|
91,185 |
|
|
|
243,073 |
|
|
|
453,646 |
|
Less: Preferred stock dividends |
|
|
(10,056 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(26,024 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Amortization of preferred
stock discount |
|
|
(2,465 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,620 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Income attributable to
unvested stock-based
compensation awards |
|
|
(1,249 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,367 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income available to common
stockholders |
|
$ |
113,894 |
|
|
|
91,185 |
|
|
|
209,062 |
|
|
|
453,646 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average shares
outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares outstanding
(including common stock
issuable) and unvested
stock-based compensation awards |
|
|
118,663 |
|
|
|
110,265 |
|
|
|
114,843 |
|
|
|
110,158 |
|
Less: Unvested stock-based
compensation awards |
|
|
(1,293 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,142 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average shares
outstanding |
|
|
117,370 |
|
|
|
110,265 |
|
|
|
113,701 |
|
|
|
110,158 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per common share |
|
$ |
.97 |
|
|
|
.83 |
|
|
|
1.84 |
|
|
|
4.12 |
|
The computations of diluted earnings per common share follow:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
|
September 30 |
|
|
September 30 |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(in thousands, except per share) |
|
Net income available to
common stockholders |
|
$ |
113,894 |
|
|
|
91,185 |
|
|
|
209,062 |
|
|
|
453,646 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted weighted-average
shares outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common and unvested stock-based
compensation awards |
|
|
118,663 |
|
|
|
110,265 |
|
|
|
114,843 |
|
|
|
110,158 |
|
Less: Unvested stock-based
compensation awards |
|
|
(1,293 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,142 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Plus: Incremental shares from
assumed conversion of
stock-based compensation awards and
convertible preferred stock |
|
|
177 |
|
|
|
542 |
|
|
|
99 |
|
|
|
842 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted weighted-average
shares outstanding |
|
|
117,547 |
|
|
|
110,807 |
|
|
|
113,800 |
|
|
|
111,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per common share |
|
$ |
.97 |
|
|
|
.82 |
|
|
|
1.84 |
|
|
|
4.09 |
|
- 18 -
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED
7. Earnings per common share, continued
GAAP requires that for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December
15, 2008 and interim periods within those years, unvested share-based payment awards that contain
nonforfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents (whether paid or unpaid) are
participating securities and shall be included in the computation of earnings per common share
pursuant to the two-class method. In 2009, the Company issued stock-based compensation awards in
the form of restricted stock and restricted stock units, which, in accordance with GAAP, are
considered participating securities. Beginning in 2009, the Companys earnings per common share
are calculated using the two-class method. The effects of the application of the two-class method
to previously reported earnings per common share amounts were immaterial.
Stock-based compensation awards and warrants to purchase common stock of M&T representing
approximately 14.7 million and 11.3 million common shares during the three-month periods ended
September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, and 14.9 million and 9.7 million common shares during
the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, were not included in the
computations of diluted earnings per common share because the effect on those periods would have
been antidilutive.
- 19 -
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED
8. Comprehensive income
The following table displays the components of other comprehensive income (loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
Before-tax |
|
|
Income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
amount |
|
|
taxes |
|
|
Net |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Unrealized gains (losses)
on investment securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available for sale (AFS)
investment securities with OTTI: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities with OTTI charges
during the period |
|
$ |
(202,737 |
) |
|
|
79,296 |
|
|
|
(123,441 |
) |
Less: OTTI charges
recognized in net income |
|
|
(104,001 |
) |
|
|
40,662 |
|
|
|
(63,339 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized losses on
investment securities
with OTTI |
|
|
(98,736 |
) |
|
|
38,634 |
|
|
|
(60,102 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AFS investment securities
all other: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized holding gains
during period |
|
|
389,609 |
|
|
|
(149,651 |
) |
|
|
239,958 |
|
Less: reclassification
adjustment for losses
realized in net income |
|
|
(135 |
) |
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
(81 |
) |
Less: securities with OTTI
charges during the period |
|
|
(202,737 |
) |
|
|
79,296 |
|
|
|
(123,441 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
592,481 |
|
|
|
(229,001 |
) |
|
|
363,480 |
|
Amortization of unrealized holding
losses to income during period
on investment securities
previously transferred from
AFS to held to maturity (HTM) |
|
|
7,955 |
|
|
|
(2,183 |
) |
|
|
5,772 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized gains on
investment securities |
|
|
501,700 |
|
|
|
(192,550 |
) |
|
|
309,150 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flow hedges: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reclassification of
losses on terminated cash
flow hedges to income |
|
|
10,873 |
|
|
|
(4,246 |
) |
|
|
6,627 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Defined benefit plans
liability adjustment |
|
|
2,521 |
|
|
|
(703 |
) |
|
|
1,818 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
515,094 |
|
|
|
(197,499 |
) |
|
|
317,595 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- 20 -
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED
8. Comprehensive income, continued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
Before-tax |
|
|
Income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
amount |
|
|
taxes |
|
|
Net |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Unrealized losses
on AFS investment securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized holding
losses during period |
|
$ |
(729,175 |
) |
|
|
226,923 |
|
|
|
(502,252 |
) |
Add: transfer of investment
securities from AFS to HTM |
|
|
86,943 |
|
|
|
(20,972 |
) |
|
|
65,971 |
|
Less: reclassification
adjustment for losses
realized in net income |
|
|
(156,771 |
) |
|
|
1,661 |
|
|
|
(155,110 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(485,461 |
) |
|
|
204,290 |
|
|
|
(281,171 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized holding losses
on investment securities
transferred from AFS to HTM: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized holding losses
transferred during period |
|
|
(86,943 |
) |
|
|
20,972 |
|
|
|
(65,971 |
) |
Less: amortization of
unrealized holding losses
to income during period |
|
|
(2,150 |
) |
|
|
766 |
|
|
|
(1,384 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(84,793 |
) |
|
|
20,206 |
|
|
|
(64,587 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized losses on
investment securities |
|
|
(570,254 |
) |
|
|
224,496 |
|
|
|
(345,758 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flow hedges: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized losses
on terminated cash
flow hedges |
|
|
(20,225 |
) |
|
|
7,887 |
|
|
|
(12,338 |
) |
Reclassification of
losses on terminated cash
flow hedges to income |
|
|
19,483 |
|
|
|
(7,604 |
) |
|
|
11,879 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(742 |
) |
|
|
283 |
|
|
|
(459 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Defined benefit plans
liability adjustment |
|
|
(1,724 |
) |
|
|
713 |
|
|
|
(1,011 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(572,720 |
) |
|
|
225,492 |
|
|
|
(347,228 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- 21 -
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED
8. Comprehensive income, continued
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net consisted of unrealized gains (losses) as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash |
|
|
Defined |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities |
|
|
flow |
|
|
benefit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
With OTTI |
|
|
All other |
|
|
hedges |
|
|
plans |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Balance January 1, 2009 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
(556,668 |
) |
|
|
(5,883 |
) |
|
|
(174,330 |
) |
|
|
(736,881 |
) |
|
Net gain (loss) during period |
|
|
(60,102 |
) |
|
|
369,252 |
|
|
|
6,627 |
|
|
|
1,818 |
|
|
|
317,595 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance September 30, 2009 |
|
$ |
(60,102 |
) |
|
|
(187,416 |
) |
|
|
744 |
|
|
|
(172,512 |
) |
|
|
(419,286 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance January 1, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(59,406 |
) |
|
|
(8,931 |
) |
|
|
(46,485 |
) |
|
|
(114,822 |
) |
|
Net gain (loss) during period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(345,758 |
) |
|
|
(459 |
) |
|
|
(1,011 |
) |
|
|
(347,228 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance September 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(405,164 |
) |
|
|
(9,390 |
) |
|
|
(47,496 |
) |
|
|
(462,050 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9. Derivative financial instruments
As part of managing interest rate risk, the Company enters into interest rate swap agreements to
modify the repricing characteristics of certain portions of the Companys portfolios of earning
assets and interest-bearing liabilities. The Company designates interest rate swap agreements
utilized in the management of interest rate risk as either fair value hedges or cash flow hedges.
Interest rate swap agreements are generally entered into with counterparties that meet established
credit standards and most contain master netting and collateral provisions protecting the at-risk
party. Based on adherence to the Companys credit standards and the presence of the netting and
collateral provisions, the Company believes that the credit risk inherent in these contracts is not
significant as of September 30, 2009.
The net effect of interest rate swap agreements was to increase net interest income by $10
million and $5 million for the three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, and
$27 million and $11 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
Information about interest rate swap agreements entered into for interest rate risk management
purposes summarized by type of financial instrument the swap agreements were intended to hedge
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
Notional |
|
|
Average |
|
|
average rate |
|
|
|
amount |
|
|
maturity |
|
|
Fixed |
|
|
Variable |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
(in years) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value hedges: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed rate time deposits (a) |
|
$ |
25,000 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
5.30 |
% |
|
|
0.36 |
% |
Fixed rate long-term borrowings (a) |
|
|
1,037,241 |
|
|
|
6.7 |
|
|
|
6.33 |
|
|
|
2.24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,062,241 |
|
|
|
6.7 |
|
|
|
6.30 |
% |
|
|
2.19 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value hedges: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed rate time deposits (a) |
|
$ |
70,000 |
|
|
|
6.1 |
|
|
|
5.14 |
% |
|
|
2.04 |
% |
Fixed rate long-term borrowings (a) |
|
|
1,037,241 |
|
|
|
7.5 |
|
|
|
6.33 |
|
|
|
4.28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,107,241 |
|
|
|
7.4 |
|
|
|
6.25 |
% |
|
|
4.14 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Under the terms of these agreements, the Company receives settlement amounts
at a fixed rate and pays at a variable rate. |
- 22 -
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED
9. Derivative financial instruments, continued
The Company utilizes commitments to sell residential and commercial real estate loans to hedge
the exposure to changes in the fair value of real estate loans held for sale. Such commitments
have generally been designated as fair value hedges. The Company also utilizes commitments to sell
real estate loans to offset the exposure to changes in fair value of certain commitments to
originate real estate loans for sale.
For derivatives designated and qualifying as fair value hedges, the fair values of the
derivatives and changes in the fair values of the hedged items are recorded in the Companys
consolidated balance sheet with the corresponding gain or loss recognized in current earnings. The
difference between changes in the fair values of the interest rate swap agreements and the hedged
items represents hedge ineffectiveness and is recorded in other revenues from operations in the
consolidated statement of income. In a cash flow hedge, the effective portion of the derivatives
unrealized gain or loss is initially recorded as a component of other comprehensive income and
subsequently reclassified into earnings when the forecasted transaction affects earnings. The
ineffective portion of the unrealized gain or loss is reported in other revenues from operations
immediately. The amount of hedge ineffectiveness recognized in the three- and nine month periods
ended September 2009 and 2008 was not material to the Companys results of operations.
Derivative financial instruments used for trading purposes included interest rate contracts,
foreign exchange and other option contracts, foreign exchange forward and spot contracts, and
financial futures. Interest rate contracts entered into for trading purposes had notional values of
$14.7 billion and $14.6 billion at September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively. The
notional amounts of foreign currency and other option and futures contracts entered into for
trading purposes aggregated $809 million and $713 million at September 30, 2009 and December 31,
2008, respectively.
- 23 -
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED
9. Derivative financial instruments, continued
Information about the fair values of derivative instruments in the Companys
consolidated balance sheet and consolidated statement of income follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset derivatives |
|
|
Liability derivatives |
|
|
|
Fair value |
|
|
Fair value |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Derivatives designated and
qualifying as hedging
instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value hedges: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swap
agreements (a) |
|
$ |
83,069 |
|
|
|
146,111 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments to sell real estate
loans (a) |
|
|
115 |
|
|
|
1,128 |
|
|
|
5,097 |
|
|
|
13,604 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
83,184 |
|
|
|
147,239 |
|
|
|
5,097 |
|
|
|
13,604 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives not designated and
qualifying as hedging
instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-related commitments to
originate real estate loans for
sale (a) |
|
|
13,958 |
|
|
|
11,132 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
2,988 |
|
Commitments to sell real estate
loans (a) |
|
|
426 |
|
|
|
5,875 |
|
|
|
7,982 |
|
|
|
8,876 |
|
Trading: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate contracts (b) |
|
|
386,240 |
|
|
|
513,230 |
|
|
|
357,363 |
|
|
|
481,671 |
|
Foreign exchange and other
option and futures contracts
(b) |
|
|
27,917 |
|
|
|
38,885 |
|
|
|
27,162 |
|
|
|
39,408 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
428,541 |
|
|
|
569,122 |
|
|
|
392,545 |
|
|
|
532,943 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivatives |
|
$ |
511,725 |
|
|
|
716,361 |
|
|
$ |
397,642 |
|
|
|
546,547 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Asset derivatives are reported in other assets and liability derivatives are reported in
other liabilities. |
|
(b) |
|
Asset derivatives are reported in trading account assets and liability derivatives are
reported in other liabilities. |
- 24 -
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED
9. Derivative financial instruments, continued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of unrealized gain (loss) recognized |
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
Derivative |
|
|
Hedged item |
|
|
Derivative |
|
|
Hedged item |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Derivatives in fair value
hedging relationships |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swap
agreements: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed rate time
deposits (a) |
|
$ |
(133 |
) |
|
|
133 |
|
|
|
(171 |
) |
|
|
165 |
|
Fixed rate long-term
borrowings (a) |
|
|
19,265 |
|
|
|
(18,349 |
) |
|
|
12,905 |
|
|
|
(12,080 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
19,132 |
|
|
|
(18,216 |
) |
|
|
12,734 |
|
|
|
(11,915 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives not designated
as hedging instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate contracts (b) |
|
$ |
(1,421 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
642 |
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange and other
option and futures contracts
(b) |
|
|
604 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(285 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
(817 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
357 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of unrealized gain (loss) recognized |
|
|
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
Derivative |
|
|
Hedged item |
|
|
Derivative |
|
|
Hedged item |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Derivatives in fair value
hedging relationships |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swap
agreements: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed rate time
deposits (a) |
|
$ |
(1,527 |
) |
|
|
1,520 |
|
|
|
(1,596 |
) |
|
|
1,574 |
|
Fixed rate long-term
borrowings (a) |
|
|
(62,452 |
) |
|
|
58,476 |
|
|
|
(10,765 |
) |
|
|
10,975 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
(63,979 |
) |
|
|
59,996 |
|
|
|
(12,361 |
) |
|
|
12,549 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives not designated
as hedging instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate contracts (b) |
|
$ |
(2,778 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,511 |
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange and other
option and futures contracts
(b) |
|
|
1,536 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
491 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
(1,242 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Reported as other revenues from operations. |
|
(b) |
|
Reported as trading account and foreign exchange gains. |
- 25 -
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED
9. Derivative financial instruments, continued
In addition, the Company also has commitments to sell and commitments to originate residential
and commercial real estate loans, which are considered derivatives. The Company designates certain
of the commitments to sell real estate loans as fair value hedges of real estate loans held for
sale. Changes in unrealized gains and losses are included in mortgage banking revenues and, in
general, are realized in subsequent periods as the related loans are sold and commitments
satisfied. Those unrealized gains and losses reflect both changes in the value of loans and commitments as well as changes in volume of the loans and commitments outstanding as of each respective period-end date. For the three months ended September 30, 2009, net unrealized pre-tax losses of
$22,672,000 related to commitments to sell real estate loans, net unrealized pre-tax gains of
$4,244,000 related to commitments to originate real estate loans and net unrealized pre-tax gains
of $8,308,000 related to hedged real estate loans held for sale were recognized in the consolidated
statement of income. For the three months ended September 30, 2008, net unrealized pre-tax gains
of $4,505,000 related to commitments to sell real estate loans, net unrealized pre-tax losses of
$5,834,000 related to commitments to originate real estate loans and net unrealized pre-tax gains
of $1,048,000 related to hedged real estate loans held for sale were recognized in the consolidated
statement of income. For the nine months ended September 30, 2009, net unrealized pre-tax gains of
$2,939,000 related to commitments to sell real estate loans, net unrealized pre-tax gains of
$5,654,000 related to commitments to originate real estate loans and net unrealized pre-tax losses
of $3,302,000 related to hedged real estate loans held for sale were recognized in the consolidated
statement of income. For the nine months ended September 30, 2008, net unrealized pre-tax gains of
$11,430,000 related to commitments to sell real estate loans, net unrealized pre-tax losses of
$4,952,000 related to commitments to originate real estate loans and net unrealized pre-tax losses
of $6,606,000 related to hedged real estate loans held for sale were recognized in the consolidated
statement of income.
The aggregate fair value of derivative financial instruments in a net liability position at
September 30, 2009 for which the Company was required to post collateral was $266 million. The
fair value of collateral posted for such instruments was $260 million.
The Companys credit exposure with respect to the
estimated fair value as of September 30, 2009 of interest rate swap agreements used for managing interest rate risk has been substantially
mitigated through master netting arrangements with trading account interest rate contracts with the same counterparties as well as
counterparty postings of $54 million of collateral with the Company.
10. Fair value measurements
Pursuant to GAAP, fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or
paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the
measurement date. A three-level hierarchy exists in GAAP for fair value measurements based upon the
inputs to the valuation of an asset or liability.
|
|
|
Level 1 Valuation is based on quoted prices in active markets for identical
assets and liabilities. |
|
|
|
|
Level 2 Valuation is determined from quoted prices for similar assets or
liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in
markets that are not active or by model-based techniques in which all significant inputs
are observable in the market. |
- 26 -
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED
10. Fair value measurements, continued
|
|
|
|
Level 3 Valuation is derived from model-based and other techniques in which
at least one significant input is unobservable and which may be based on the Companys own
estimates about the assumptions that market participants would use to value the asset or
liability. |
When available, the Company attempts to use quoted market prices in active markets to
determine fair value and classifies such items as Level 1 or Level 2. If quoted market prices in
active markets are not available, fair value is often determined using model-based techniques
incorporating various assumptions including interest rates, prepayment speeds and credit losses.
Assets and liabilities valued using model-based techniques are classified as either Level 2 or
Level 3, depending on the lowest level classification of an input that is considered significant to
the overall valuation. The following is a description of the valuation methodologies used for the
Companys assets and liabilities that are measured on a recurring basis at estimated fair value.
Trading account assets and liabilities
Trading account assets and liabilities consist primarily of interest rate swap agreements and
foreign exchange contracts with customers who require such services with offsetting positions with
third parties to minimize the Companys risk with respect to such transactions. The Company
generally determines the fair value of its derivative trading account assets and liabilities using
externally developed pricing models based on market observable inputs and therefore classifies such
valuations as Level 2. Prices for certain foreign exchange contracts are more observable and
therefore have been classified as Level 1. Mutual funds held in connection with deferred
compensation arrangements have also been classified as Level 1 valuations. Valuations of
investments in municipal and other bonds can generally be obtained through reference to quoted
prices in less active markets for the same or similar securities or through model-based techniques
in which all significant inputs are observable and, therefore, such valuations have been classified
as Level 2.
Investment securities available for sale
The majority of the Companys available-for-sale investment securities have been valued by
reference to prices for similar securities or through model-based techniques in which all
significant inputs are observable and, therefore, such valuations have been classified as Level 2.
Certain investments in mutual funds and equity securities are actively traded and therefore have
been classified as Level 1 valuations.
Due to the severe disruption in the credit markets during the second half of 2008 and
continuing into 2009, trading activity in privately issued mortgage-backed securities was very
limited. The markets for such securities were generally characterized by a sharp reduction of
non-agency mortgage-backed securities issuances, a significant reduction in trading volumes and
extremely wide bid-ask spreads, all driven by the lack of market participants. Although estimated
prices were generally obtained for such securities, the Company was significantly restricted in the
level of market observable assumptions used in the valuation of its privately issued
mortgage-backed securities portfolio. Specifically, market assumptions regarding credit adjusted
cash flows and liquidity influences on discount rates were difficult to observe at the individual
bond level. Because of the inactivity in the markets and the lack of observable valuation inputs,
the Company has classified the valuation of privately issued mortgage-backed securities as Level 3.
In April 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued new accounting rules
that provided guidance for estimating fair value when the volume and level of trading activity for
an asset or liability have significantly decreased. The Company has concluded that there has been
a significant decline
- 27 -
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED
10. Fair value measurements, continued
in the volume and level of activity in the market for privately issued
mortgage-backed securities. As a result, the Company supplemented its determination of fair value
for many of its privately issued mortgage-backed securities by obtaining pricing indications from two independent sources at
September 30, 2009. The Company further ascertained that many of the recently observable trades in
the market for privately issued residential mortgage-backed securities could not be determined to
be orderly. As a result, the Company also performed internal modeling to estimate the cash flows
and fair value of 148 of its privately issued residential mortgage-backed securities with an
amortized cost basis of $2.0 billion at September 30, 2009. The Companys internal modeling
techniques included discounting estimated bond-specific cash flows using assumptions about cash
flows associated with loans underlying each of the bonds, including estimates about the timing and
amount of credit losses and prepayments. In estimating those cash flows, the Company used
conservative assumptions as to future delinquency, defaults and loss rates, including assumptions
for further home price depreciation. Differences between internal model valuations and external
pricing indications were generally considered to be reflective of the lack of liquidity in the
market for privately issued mortgage-backed securities given the conservative nature of the cash
flow modeling performed in the Companys assessment of value. To determine the point within the
range of potential values that was most representative of fair value under current market
conditions for each of the 148 bonds, the Company computed values based on judgmentally applied
weightings of the internal model valuations and the indications obtained from the average of the
two independent pricing sources. Weightings applied to internal model valuations generally ranged
from zero to 40% depending on bond structure and collateral type, with prices for bonds in
non-senior tranches generally receiving lower weightings on the internal model results and senior
bonds receiving a higher model weighting. Weighted-average reliance on internal model pricing for
the bonds modeled was 36% with a 64% average weighting placed on the values provided by the
independent sources. The Company concluded its estimate of fair value for the $2.0 billion of
privately issued residential mortgage-backed securities to approximate $1.7 billion, which implies
a weighted-average market yield based on reasonably likely cash flows of 10.5%. Other valuations
of privately issued residential mortgage-backed securities with an amortized cost basis of $569
million and fair value of $526 million, primarily comprised of retained securities from two
non-recourse securitization transactions executed by the Company in 2002 and 2003, and other
privately issued commercial mortgage-backed securities with an amortized cost basis of $35 million
and a fair value of $24 million were determined by reference to independent pricing sources without
adjustment.
Included in collateralized debt obligations are securities backed by trust preferred
securities issued by financial institutions and other entities. Given the severe disruption in the
credit markets and lack of observable trade information, the Company could not obtain pricing
indications for many of these securities from its two primary independent pricing sources. The
Company, therefore, performed internal modeling to estimate the cash flows and fair value of its
portfolio of securities backed by trust preferred securities at September 30, 2009. The modeling
techniques included discounting estimated cash flows using bond-specific assumptions about
defaults, deferrals and prepayments of the trust preferred securities underlying each bond. The
estimation of cash flows included conservative assumptions as to the future collateral defaults and
the related loss severities. The resulting cash flows were then discounted by reference to market
yields observed in the single-name trust preferred securities market. At September 30, 2009, both
the total amortized cost and fair value of securities backed by trust preferred securities issued
by financial institutions and other entities was $107 million and $131 million, respectively.
Privately issued mortgage-backed securities and securities backed
- 28 -
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED
10. Fair value measurements, continued
by trust preferred securities
issued by financial institutions and other entities constituted substantially all of the available
for sale investment securities classified as Level 3 valuations as of September 30, 2009.
Real estate loans held for sale
The Company utilizes commitments to sell real estate loans to hedge the exposure to changes in fair
value of real estate loans held for sale. The carrying value of hedged real estate loans held for
sale includes changes in estimated fair value during the hedge period. Typically, the Company
attempts to hedge real estate loans held for sale from the date of close through the sale date.
The fair value of hedged real estate loans held for sale is generally calculated by reference to
quoted prices in secondary markets for commitments to sell real estate loans with similar
characteristics and, as such, have been classified as a Level 2 valuation.
Commitments to originate real estate loans for sale and commitments to sell real estate loans
The Company enters into various commitments to originate real estate loans for sale and commitments
to sell real estate loans. Such commitments are considered to be derivative financial instruments
and, therefore, are carried at estimated fair value on the consolidated balance sheet. The
estimated fair values of such commitments were generally calculated by reference to quoted prices
in secondary markets for commitments to sell real estate loans to certain government-sponsored
entities and other parties. The fair valuations of commitments to sell real estate loans generally
result in a Level 2 classification. The estimated fair value of commitments to originate real
estate loans for sale are adjusted to reflect the Companys anticipated commitment expirations.
Estimated commitment expirations are considered a significant unobservable input, which results in
a Level 3 classification. The Company includes the expected net future cash flows related to the
associated servicing of the loan in the fair value measurement of a derivative loan commitment.
The estimated value ascribed to the expected net future servicing cash flows is also considered a
significant unobservable input contributing to the Level 3 classification of commitments to
originate real estate loans for sale.
Interest rate swap agreements used for interest rate risk management
The Company utilizes interest rate swap agreements as part of the management of interest rate risk
to modify the repricing characteristics of certain portions of its portfolios of earning assets and
interest-bearing liabilities. The Company generally determines the fair value of its interest rate
swap agreements using externally developed pricing models based on market observable inputs and
therefore classifies such valuations as Level 2. The Company has considered counterparty credit
risk in the valuation of its interest rate swap assets and has considered its own credit risk in
the valuation of its interest rate swap liabilities.
- 29 -
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED
10. Fair value measurements, continued
The following tables present assets and liabilities at September 30, 2009 and December 31,
2008 measured at estimated fair value on a recurring basis:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
measurements at |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Trading account assets |
|
$ |
497,064 |
|
|
|
46,633 |
|
|
|
450,431 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities
available for sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury and
federal agencies |
|
|
114,783 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
114,783 |
|
|
|
|
|
Obligations of states
and political subdivisions |
|
|
68,452 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56,117 |
|
|
|
12,335 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Government issued or
guaranteed |
|
|
3,622,992 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,622,992 |
|
|
|
|
|
Privately issued
residential |
|
|
2,184,237 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,184,237 |
|
Privately issued
commercial |
|
|
23,541 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,541 |
|
Collateralized debt
obligations |
|
|
131,337 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
131,337 |
|
Other debt securities |
|
|
241,166 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
240,781 |
|
|
|
385 |
|
Equity securities |
|
|
136,348 |
|
|
|
117,131 |
|
|
|
16,899 |
|
|
|
2,318 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,522,856 |
|
|
|
117,131 |
|
|
|
4,051,572 |
|
|
|
2,354,153 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate loans
held for sale |
|
|
580,810 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
580,810 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets (a) |
|
|
97,656 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
83,698 |
|
|
|
13,958 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
7,698,386 |
|
|
|
163,764 |
|
|
|
5,166,511 |
|
|
|
2,368,111 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading account
liabilities |
|
$ |
384,525 |
|
|
|
12,097 |
|
|
|
372,428 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities (a) |
|
|
13,117 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,079 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
$ |
397,642 |
|
|
|
12,097 |
|
|
|
385,507 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- 30 -
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED
10. Fair value measurements, continued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
measurements at |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
Trading account assets |
|
$ |
617,821 |
|
|
|
46,142 |
|
|
|
571,679 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities
available for sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury and
federal agencies |
|
|
296,713 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
291,181 |
|
|
|
5,532 |
|
Obligations of states
and political subdivisions |
|
|
71,763 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71,725 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Government issued or
guaranteed |
|
|
3,612,780 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,528,236 |
|
|
|
84,544 |
|
Privately issued
residential |
|
|
2,326,554 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,326,554 |
|
Privately issued
commercial |
|
|
41,046 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,046 |
|
Collateralized debt
obligations |
|
|
2,496 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,496 |
|
Other debt securities |
|
|
168,102 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
168,102 |
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securities |
|
|
330,739 |
|
|
|
297,231 |
|
|
|
31,206 |
|
|
|
2,302 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,850,193 |
|
|
|
297,231 |
|
|
|
4,090,450 |
|
|
|
2,462,512 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate loans
held for sale |
|
|
507,971 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
507,971 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets (a) |
|
|
164,433 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
153,179 |
|
|
|
11,254 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
8,140,418 |
|
|
|
343,373 |
|
|
|
5,323,279 |
|
|
|
2,473,766 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading account
liabilities |
|
$ |
521,079 |
|
|
|
14,193 |
|
|
|
506,886 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities (a) |
|
|
25,468 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,480 |
|
|
|
2,988 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
$ |
546,547 |
|
|
|
14,193 |
|
|
|
529,366 |
|
|
|
2,988 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Comprised predominantly of interest rate swap agreements used for interest rate risk
management (Level 2), commitments to sell real estate loans (Level 2) and commitments to
originate real estate loans to be held for sale (Level 3). |
- 31 -
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED
10. Fair value measurements, continued
The changes in Level 3 assets and liabilities measured at estimated fair value on a
recurring basis during the three months ended September 30, 2009 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
gains (losses) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
included in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gains (losses) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
realized/unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
related to |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in |
|
|
Purchases, |
|
|
Transfer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
assets still |
|
|
|
Balance- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
other |
|
|
sales, |
|
|
in and/or |
|
|
Balance- |
|
|
held at |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
Included |
|
|
comprehensive |
|
|
issuances & |
|
|
out of |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
in earnings |
|
|
income |
|
|
settlements |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Investment
securities
available for sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obligations of
states and
political
subdivisions |
|
$ |
12,203 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
132 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,335 |
|
|
|
|
|
Privately issued
residential
mortgage-backed
securities |
|
|
2,241,758 |
|
|
|
(44,278 |
)(a) |
|
|
161,308 |
|
|
|
(174,551 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,184,237 |
|
|
|
(44,278 |
)(a) |
Privately issued
commercial
mortgage-backed
securities |
|
|
23,018 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
523 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,541 |
|
|
|
|
|
Collateralized debt
obligations |
|
|
112,372 |
|
|
|
(2,502 |
)(a) |
|
|
19,205 |
|
|
|
2,262 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
131,337 |
|
|
|
(2,502 |
)(a) |
Other debt
securities |
|
|
765 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(450 |
) |
|
|
385 |
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securities |
|
|
2,329 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,318 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,392,445 |
|
|
|
(46,780 |
) |
|
|
181,239 |
|
|
|
(172,301 |
) |
|
|
(450 |
) |
|
|
2,354,153 |
|
|
|
(46,780 |
) |
Other assets and
other liabilities |
|
|
9,676 |
|
|
|
16,195 |
(b) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,951 |
) |
|
|
13,920 |
|
|
|
13,148 |
(b) |
- 32 -
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED
10. Fair value measurements, continued
The changes in Level 3 assets and liabilities measured at estimated fair value on a recurring
basis during the three months ended September 30, 2008 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
gains (losses) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
included in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gains (losses) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
realized/unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
related to |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in |
|
|
Purchases, |
|
|
Transfer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
assets still |
|
|
|
Balance- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
other |
|
|
sales, |
|
|
in and/or |
|
|
Balance- |
|
|
held at |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
Included |
|
|
comprehensive |
|
|
issuances & |
|
|
out of |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
in earnings |
|
|
income |
|
|
settlements |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Investment
securities
available for sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury and
federal agencies |
|
$ |
5,367 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
(123 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,305 |
|
|
|
|
|
Obligations of
states and
political
subdivisions |
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
|
|
Government
issued or
guaranteed
mortgage- backed
securities |
|
|
89,071 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(745 |
) |
|
|
(2,704 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
85,622 |
|
|
|
|
|
Privately
issued residential
and commercial
mortgage- backed
securities |
|
|
896,018 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(24,110 |
) |
|
|
(25,306 |
) |
|
|
1,941,572 |
|
|
|
2,788,174 |
|
|
|
|
|
Collateralized
debt obligations |
|
|
14,482 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,383 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
5,125 |
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
securities |
|
|
2,329 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
(24 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,007,314 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(34,182 |
) |
|
|
(28,157 |
) |
|
|
1,941,598 |
|
|
|
2,886,573 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets
and other
liabilities |
|
|
4,119 |
|
|
|
1,214 |
(b) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,047 |
) |
|
|
(1,714 |
) |
|
|
(1,939 |
)(b) |
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Reported as an other-than-temporary impairment loss in the consolidated statement of income
or as gain (loss) on bank investment securities. |
|
(b) |
|
Reported as mortgage banking revenues in the consolidated statement of income and includes
the fair value of commitment issuances and expirations. |
- 33 -
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED
10. Fair value measurements, continued
The changes in Level 3 assets and liabilities measured at estimated fair value on a
recurring basis during the nine months ended September 30, 2009 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
gains (losses) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
included in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gains (losses) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
realized/unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
related to |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in |
|
|
Purchases, |
|
|
Transfer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
assets still |
|
|
|
Balance- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
other |
|
|
sales, |
|
|
in and/or |
|
|
Balance- |
|
|
held at |
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
Included |
|
|
comprehensive |
|
|
issuances & |
|
|
out of |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
in earnings |
|
|
income |
|
|
settlements |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Investment
securities
available for sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury and
federal agencies |
|
$ |
5,532 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,532 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obligations of
states and
political
subdivisions |
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
154 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,143 |
|
|
|
12,335 |
|
|
|
|
|
Government issued
or guaranteed
mortgage-backed
securities |
|
|
84,544 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(84,544 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Privately issued
residential
mortgage-backed
securities |
|
|
2,326,554 |
|
|
|
(98,746 |
)(a) |
|
|
376,435 |
|
|
|
(420,006 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,184,237 |
|
|
|
(98,746 |
)(a) |
Privately issued
commercial
mortgage-backed
securities |
|
|
41,046 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,478 |
) |
|
|
(9,027 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,541 |
|
|
|
|
|
Collateralized debt
obligations |
|
|
2,496 |
|
|
|
(4,055 |
)(a) |
|
|
32,917 |
|
|
|
99,979 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
131,337 |
|
|
|
(4,055 |
)(a) |
Other debt
securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110 |
|
|
|
725 |
|
|
|
(450 |
) |
|
|
385 |
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securities |
|
|
2,302 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,318 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,462,512 |
|
|
|
(102,801 |
) |
|
|
401,140 |
|
|
|
(328,315 |
) |
|
|
(78,383 |
) |
|
|
2,354,153 |
|
|
|
(102,801 |
) |
Other assets and
other liabilities |
|
|
8,266 |
|
|
|
35,685 |
(b) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(30,031 |
) |
|
|
13,920 |
|
|
|
16,444 |
(b) |
- 34 -
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED
10. Fair value measurements, continued
The changes in Level 3 assets and liabilities measured at estimated fair value on a recurring
basis during the nine months ended September 30, 2008 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
gains |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(losses) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
included in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gains (losses) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
realized/unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
related to |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in |
|
|
Purchases, |
|
|
Transfer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
assets still |
|
|
|
Balance- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
other |
|
|
sales, |
|
|
in and/or |
|
|
Balance- |
|
|
held at |
|
|
|
January 1, |
|
|
Included |
|
|
comprehensive |
|
|
issuances & |
|
|
out of |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
in earnings |
|
|
income |
|
|
settlements |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Investment
securities
available for sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury and
federal agencies |
|
$ |
5,696 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
(432 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,305 |
|
|
|
|
|
Obligations of
states and
political
subdivisions |
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
|
|
Government
issued or
guaranteed
mortgage- backed
securities |
|
|
118,992 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
(4,495 |
) |
|
|
(28,936 |
) |
|
|
85,622 |
|
|
|
|
|
Privately
issued residential
and commercial
mortgage- backed
securities |
|
|
1,159,644 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(101,748 |
) |
|
|
(126,075 |
) |
|
|
1,856,353 |
|
|
|
2,788,174 |
|
|
|
|
|
Collateralized
debt obligations |
|
|
27,115 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(22,016 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
5,125 |
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
securities |
|
|
2,324 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,313,821 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(123,674 |
) |
|
|
(131,017 |
) |
|
|
1,827,443 |
|
|
|
2,886,573 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets
and other
liabilities |
|
|
2,654 |
|
|
|
16,176 |
(b) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20,544 |
) |
|
|
(1,714 |
) |
|
|
(1,714 |
)(b) |
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Reported as an other-than-temporary impairment loss in the consolidated statement of
income or as gain (loss) on bank investment securities. |
|
(b) |
|
Reported as mortgage banking revenues in the consolidated statement of income and includes
the fair value of commitment issuances and expirations. |
- 35 -
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED
10. Fair value measurements, continued
The Company is required, on a nonrecurring basis, to adjust the carrying value of certain
assets or provide valuation allowances related to certain assets using fair value measurements.
Loans
Loans are generally not recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. Periodically, the Company
records nonrecurring adjustments to the carrying value of loans based on fair value measurements
for partial charge-offs of the uncollectible portions of those loans. Nonrecurring adjustments also
include certain impairment amounts for collateral-dependent loans when establishing the allowance
for credit losses. Such amounts are generally based on the fair value of the underlying collateral
supporting the loan and, as a result, the carrying value of the loan less the calculated valuation
amount does not necessarily represent the fair value of the loan. Real estate collateral is
typically valued using appraisals or other indications of value based on recent comparable sales of
similar properties or assumptions generally observable in the marketplace and the related
nonrecurring fair value measurement adjustments have generally been classified as Level 2, unless
significant adjustments have been made to the valuation that are not readily observable by market
participants. Estimates of fair value used for other collateral supporting commercial loans
generally are based on assumptions not observable in the marketplace and therefore such valuations
have been classified as Level 3. Loans subject to nonrecurring fair value measurement were $828
million at September 30, 2009, ($301 million and $527 million of which were classified as Level 2
and Level 3, respectively) and $328 million at September 30, 2008 ($205 million and $123 million of
which were classified as Level 2 and Level 3, respectively). Changes in fair value recognized for
partial charge-offs of loans and loan impairment reserves on loans held by the Company on September
30, 2009 were decreases of $136 million and $292 million for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2009, respectively, and on loans held by the Company on September 30, 2008 were
decreases of $76 million and $131 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008,
respectively.
Capitalized servicing rights
Capitalized servicing rights are initially measured at fair value in the Companys
consolidated balance sheet. The Company utilizes the amortization method to subsequently measure
its capitalized servicing assets. In accordance with GAAP, the Company must record impairment
charges, on a nonrecurring basis, when the carrying value of certain strata exceed their estimated
fair value. To estimate the fair value of servicing rights, the Company considers market prices for
similar assets, if available, and the present value of expected future cash flows associated with
the servicing rights calculated using assumptions that market participants would use in estimating
future servicing income and expense. Such assumptions include estimates of the cost of servicing
loans, loan default rates, an appropriate discount rate, and prepayment speeds. For purposes of
evaluating and measuring impairment of capitalized servicing rights, the Company stratifies such
assets based on the predominant risk characteristics of the underlying financial instruments that
are expected to have the most impact on projected prepayments, cost of servicing and other factors
affecting future cash flows associated with the servicing rights. Such factors may include
financial asset or loan type, note rate and term. The amount of impairment recognized is the amount
by which the carrying value of the capitalized servicing rights for a stratum exceed estimated fair
value. Impairment is recognized through a valuation allowance. The determination of fair value of
capitalized servicing rights is considered a Level 3 valuation. At September 30, 2009, $28 million
of capitalized servicing rights had a carrying value equal to their fair value. Changes in the fair
value-based valuation allowance for capitalized servicing rights recognized for the nine months
ended September 30, 2009 reflected increases in fair value of $18 million. There were no similar
changes during the
- 36 -
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED
10. Fair value measurements, continued
three months ended September 30, 2009. At September 30, 2008, $20 million of capitalized servicing
rights had a carrying value equal to their fair value. Changes in the fair value-based valuation
allowance for capitalized servicing rights recognized for the three months ended September 30, 2008
reflected decreases in fair value of $1 million and for the nine months ended September 30, 2008
reflected increases in fair value of $3 million.
Assets taken in foreclosure of defaulted loans
Assets taken in foreclosure of defaulted loans are primarily comprised of commercial and
residential real property and are generally measured at the lower of cost or fair value less costs
to sell. The fair value of the real property is generally determined using appraisals or other
indications of value based on recent comparable sales of similar properties or assumptions
generally observable in the marketplace, and the related nonrecurring fair value measurement
adjustments have generally been classified as Level 2. Assets taken in foreclosure of defaulted
loans subject to nonrecurring fair value measurement were $38 million at September 30, 2009.
Changes in fair value recognized for those foreclosed assets held by the Company at September 30,
2009 were $4 million and $25 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009,
respectively.
- 37 -
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED
10. Fair value measurements, continued
Disclosures of fair value of financial instruments
With the exception of marketable securities, certain off-balance sheet financial instruments and
one-to-four family residential mortgage loans originated for sale, the Companys financial
instruments are not readily marketable and market prices do not exist. The Company, in attempting
to comply with the provisions of GAAP that require disclosures of fair value of financial
instruments, has not attempted to market its financial instruments to potential buyers, if any
exist. Since negotiated prices in illiquid markets depend greatly upon the then present motivations
of the buyer and seller, it is reasonable to assume that actual sales prices could vary widely from
any estimate of fair value made without the benefit of negotiations. Additionally, changes in
market interest rates can dramatically impact the value of financial instruments in a short period
of time. Additional information about the assumptions and calculations utilized is presented below.
The carrying amounts and estimated fair value for financial instrument assets (liabilities)
are presented in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Calculated |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Calculated |
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Estimate |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Estimate |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Financial assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
1,373,714 |
|
|
$ |
1,373,714 |
|
|
$ |
1,568,151 |
|
|
$ |
1,568,151 |
|
Interest-bearing deposits at banks |
|
|
54,443 |
|
|
|
54,443 |
|
|
|
10,284 |
|
|
|
10,284 |
|
Trading account assets |
|
|
497,064 |
|
|
|
497,064 |
|
|
|
617,821 |
|
|
|
617,821 |
|
Agreements to resell securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90,000 |
|
|
|
90,000 |
|
Investment securities |
|
|
7,634,262 |
|
|
|
7,466,555 |
|
|
|
7,919,207 |
|
|
|
7,828,121 |
|
Loans and leases: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial loans and leases |
|
|
13,517,538 |
|
|
|
13,075,496 |
|
|
|
14,261,882 |
|
|
|
14,137,805 |
|
Commercial real estate loans |
|
|
21,007,376 |
|
|
|
20,428,915 |
|
|
|
18,837,665 |
|
|
|
18,210,209 |
|
Residential real estate loans |
|
|
5,427,260 |
|
|
|
5,001,990 |
|
|
|
4,904,424 |
|
|
|
4,249,137 |
|
Consumer loans |
|
|
12,251,598 |
|
|
|
11,746,905 |
|
|
|
10,996,492 |
|
|
|
10,849,635 |
|
Allowance for credit losses |
|
|
(867,874 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(787,904 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans and leases, net |
|
|
51,335,898 |
|
|
|
50,253,306 |
|
|
|
48,212,559 |
|
|
|
47,446,786 |
|
Accrued interest receivable |
|
|
235,225 |
|
|
|
235,225 |
|
|
|
222,073 |
|
|
|
222,073 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest-bearing deposits |
|
$ |
(12,730,083 |
) |
|
$ |
(12,730,083 |
) |
|
$ |
(8,856,114 |
) |
|
$ |
(8,856,114 |
) |
Savings deposits and NOW accounts |
|
|
(24,048,178 |
) |
|
|
(24,048,178 |
) |
|
|
(20,630,226 |
) |
|
|
(20,630,226 |
) |
Time deposits |
|
|
(8,765,520 |
) |
|
|
(8,838,198 |
) |
|
|
(9,046,937 |
) |
|
|
(9,108,821 |
) |
Deposits at foreign office |
|
|
(1,318,070 |
) |
|
|
(1,318,070 |
) |
|
|
(4,047,986 |
) |
|
|
(4,047,986 |
) |
Short-term borrowings |
|
|
(2,927,268 |
) |
|
|
(2,927,268 |
) |
|
|
(3,009,735 |
) |
|
|
(3,009,735 |
) |
Long-term borrowings |
|
|
(10,354,392 |
) |
|
|
(9,748,011 |
) |
|
|
(12,075,149 |
) |
|
|
(11,104,337 |
) |
Accrued interest payable |
|
|
(149,137 |
) |
|
|
(149,137 |
) |
|
|
(142,456 |
) |
|
|
(142,456 |
) |
Trading account liabilities |
|
|
(384,525 |
) |
|
|
(384,525 |
) |
|
|
(521,079 |
) |
|
|
(521,079 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other financial instruments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments to originate real estate
loans for sale |
|
$ |
13,920 |
|
|
$ |
13,920 |
|
|
$ |
8,144 |
|
|
$ |
8,144 |
|
Commitments to sell real estate loans |
|
|
(12,538 |
) |
|
|
(12,538 |
) |
|
|
(15,477 |
) |
|
|
(15,477 |
) |
Other credit-related commitments |
|
|
(51,549 |
) |
|
|
(51,549 |
) |
|
|
(51,361 |
) |
|
|
(51,361 |
) |
Interest rate swap agreements used
for interest rate risk management |
|
|
83,069 |
|
|
|
83,069 |
|
|
|
146,111 |
|
|
|
146,111 |
|
- 38 -
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED
10. Fair value measurements, continued
The following assumptions and methods or calculations were used in determining the estimated
fair value of financial instruments not measured at fair value in the consolidated balance sheet.
Cash and cash equivalents, interest-bearing deposits at banks, short-term borrowings, accrued
interest receivable and accrued interest payable
Due to the nature of cash and cash equivalents and the near maturity of interest-bearing deposits
at banks, short-term borrowings, accrued interest receivable and accrued interest payable, the
Company estimated that the carrying amount of such instruments approximated estimated fair value.
Agreements to resell securities
The amounts assigned to agreements to resell securities were based on discounted calculations of
projected cash flows.
Investment securities
Estimated fair values of investments in readily marketable securities were generally based on
quoted market prices. Investment securities that were not readily marketable were assigned amounts
based on estimates provided by outside parties or modeling techniques that relied upon discounted
calculations of projected cash flows or, in the case of other investment securities, which include
capital stock of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York and the Federal Home Loan Bank of New York,
at an amount equal to the carrying amount.
Loans and leases
In general, discount rates used to calculate values for loan products were based on the Companys
pricing at the respective period end and included appropriate adjustments for expected credit
losses. A higher discount rate was assumed with respect to estimated cash flows associated with
nonaccrual loans. Projected loan cash flows were adjusted for estimated credit losses. However,
such estimates made by the Company may not be indicative of assumptions and adjustments that a
purchaser of the Companys loans and leases would seek.
Deposits
Pursuant to GAAP, the estimated fair value ascribed to noninterest-bearing deposits, savings
deposits and NOW accounts must be established at carrying value because of the customers ability
to withdraw funds immediately. Time deposit accounts are required to be revalued based upon
prevailing market interest rates for similar maturity instruments. As a result, amounts assigned to
time deposits were based on discounted cash flow calculations using prevailing market interest
rates based on the Companys pricing at the respective date for deposits with comparable remaining
terms to maturity.
The Company believes that deposit accounts have a value greater than that prescribed by GAAP.
The Company feels, however, that the value associated with these deposits is greatly influenced by
characteristics of the buyer, such as the ability to reduce the costs of servicing the deposits and
deposit attrition which often occurs following an acquisition.
Long-term borrowings
The amounts assigned to long-term borrowings were based on quoted market prices, when available, or
were based on discounted cash flow calculations using prevailing market interest rates for
borrowings of similar terms and credit risk.
- 39 -
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED
10. Fair value measurements, continued
Commitments to originate real estate loans for sale and commitments to sell real estate loans
The Company enters into various commitments to originate real estate loans for sale and commitments
to sell real estate loans. Such commitments are considered to be derivative financial instruments
and, therefore, are carried at estimated fair value on the consolidated balance sheet. The
estimated fair values of such commitments were generally calculated by reference to quoted market
prices for commitments to sell real estate loans to certain government-sponsored entities and other
parties.
Interest rate swap agreements used for interest rate risk management
The estimated fair value of interest rate swap agreements used for interest rate risk management
represents the amount the Company would have expected to receive or pay to terminate such
agreements.
Other commitments and contingencies
As described in note 11, in the normal course of business, various commitments and contingent
liabilities are outstanding, such as loan commitments, credit guarantees and letters of credit. The
Companys pricing of such financial instruments is based largely on credit quality and
relationship, probability of funding and other requirements. Loan commitments often have fixed
expiration dates and contain termination and other clauses which provide for relief from funding in
the event of significant deterioration in the credit quality of the customer. The rates and terms
of the Companys loan commitments, credit guarantees and letters of credit are competitive with
other financial institutions operating in markets served by the Company. The Company believes that
the carrying amounts, which are included in other liabilities, are reasonable estimates of the fair
value of these financial instruments.
The Company does not believe that the estimated information presented herein is representative
of the earnings power or value of the Company. The preceding analysis, which is inherently limited
in depicting fair value, also does not consider any value associated with existing customer
relationships nor the ability of the Company to create value through loan origination, deposit
gathering or fee generating activities.
Many of the estimates presented herein are based upon the use of highly subjective information
and assumptions and, accordingly, the results may not be precise. Management believes that fair
value estimates may not be comparable between financial institutions due to the wide range of
permitted valuation techniques and numerous estimates which must be made. Furthermore, because the
disclosed fair value amounts were estimated as of the balance sheet date, the amounts actually
realized or paid upon maturity or settlement of the various financial instruments could be
significantly different.
- 40 -
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED
11. Commitments and contingencies
In the normal course of business, various commitments and contingent liabilities are outstanding.
The following table presents the Companys significant commitments. Certain of these commitments
are not included in the Companys consolidated balance sheet.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
|
(in thousands) |
Commitments to extend credit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home equity lines of credit |
|
$ |
6,555,861 |
|
|
|
5,972,541 |
|
Commercial real estate loans
to be sold |
|
|
40,626 |
|
|
|
252,559 |
|
Other commercial real estate
and construction |
|
|
1,766,440 |
|
|
|
2,238,464 |
|
Residential real estate loans
to be sold |
|
|
795,084 |
|
|
|
870,578 |
|
Other residential real estate |
|
|
140,325 |
|
|
|
211,705 |
|
Commercial and other |
|
|
7,115,523 |
|
|
|
6,666,988 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Standby letters of credit |
|
|
3,848,468 |
|
|
|
3,886,396 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial letters of credit |
|
|
56,059 |
|
|
|
45,503 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial guarantees and
indemnification contracts |
|
|
1,549,714 |
|
|
|
1,546,873 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments to sell
real estate loans |
|
|
1,070,413 |
|
|
|
1,306,041 |
|
Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to customers, generally having fixed
expiration dates or other termination clauses that may require payment of a fee. Standby and
commercial letters of credit are conditional commitments issued to guarantee the performance of a
customer to a third party. Standby letters of credit generally are contingent upon the failure of
the customer to perform according to the terms of the underlying contract with the third party,
whereas commercial letters of credit are issued to facilitate commerce and typically result in the
commitment being funded when the underlying transaction is consummated between the customer and a
third party. The credit risk associated with commitments to extend credit and standby and
commercial letters of credit is essentially the same as that involved with extending loans to
customers and is subject to normal credit policies. Collateral may be obtained based on
managements assessment of the customers creditworthiness.
Financial guarantees and indemnification contracts are oftentimes similar to standby letters
of credit and may include mandatory purchase agreements issued to ensure that customer obligations
are fulfilled, recourse obligations associated with sold loans, and other guarantees of customer
performance or compliance with designated rules and regulations. Included in financial guarantees
and indemnification contracts are loan principal amounts sold with recourse in conjunction with the
Companys involvement in the Federal National Mortgage Association Delegated Underwriting and
Servicing program. The Companys maximum credit risk for recourse associated with loans sold under
this program totaled approximately $1.3 billion and $1.2 billion at September 30, 2009 and December
31, 2008, respectively.
Since many loan commitments, standby letters of credit, and guarantees and indemnification
contracts expire without being funded in whole or in part, the contract amounts are not necessarily
indicative of future cash flows.
- 41 -
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED
11. Commitments and contingencies, continued
The Company utilizes commitments to sell real estate loans to hedge exposure to changes in the
fair value of real estate loans held for sale. Such commitments are considered derivatives and
along with commitments to originate real estate loans to be held for sale are generally recorded in
the consolidated balance sheet at estimated fair market value.
The Company has an agreement with the Baltimore Ravens of the National Football League whereby
the Company obtained the naming rights to a football stadium in Baltimore, Maryland. Under the
agreement, the Company is obligated to pay $5 million per year through 2013 and $6 million per year
from 2014 through 2017.
The Company also has commitments under long-term operating leases.
The Company reinsures credit life and accident and health insurance purchased by consumer loan
customers. The Company also enters into reinsurance contracts with third party insurance companies
who insure against the risk of a mortgage borrowers payment default in connection with certain
mortgage loans originated by the Company. When providing reinsurance coverage, the Company
receives a premium in exchange for accepting a portion of the insurers risk of loss. The
outstanding loan principal balances reinsured by the Company were approximately $99 million at
September 30, 2009. Assets of subsidiaries providing reinsurance that are available to satisfy
claims totaled approximately $70 million at September 30, 2009. The amounts noted above are not
necessarily indicative of losses which may ultimately be incurred. Such losses are expected to be
substantially less because most loans are repaid by borrowers in accordance with the original loan
terms.
M&T and its subsidiaries are subject in the normal course of business to various pending and
threatened legal proceedings in which claims for monetary damages are asserted. Management, after
consultation with legal counsel, does not anticipate that the aggregate ultimate liability arising
out of litigation pending against M&T or its subsidiaries will be material to the Companys
consolidated financial position, but at the present time is not in a position to determine whether
such litigation will have a material adverse effect on the Companys consolidated results of
operations in any future reporting period.
12. Segment information
Reportable segments have been determined based upon the Companys internal profitability reporting
system, which is organized by strategic business unit. Certain strategic business units have been
combined for segment information reporting purposes where the nature of the products and services,
the type of customer and the distribution of those products and services are similar. The
reportable segments are Business Banking, Commercial Banking, Commercial Real Estate, Discretionary
Portfolio, Residential Mortgage Banking and Retail Banking.
The financial information of the Companys segments was compiled utilizing the accounting
policies described in note 22 to the Companys consolidated financial statements as of and for the
year ended December 31, 2008. The management accounting policies and processes utilized in
compiling segment financial information are highly subjective and, unlike financial accounting, are
not based on authoritative guidance similar to GAAP. As a result, the financial information of the
reported segments is not necessarily comparable with similar information reported by other
financial institutions. As also described in note 22 to the Companys 2008 consolidated financial
statements, neither goodwill nor core deposit and other intangible assets (and the amortization
charges associated with such assets) resulting from acquisitions of financial institutions have
been allocated to the Companys reportable segments,
- 42 -
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED
12. Segment information, continued
but are included in the All Other category. The Company does, however, assign such intangible
assets to business units for purposes of testing for impairment.
Information about the Companys segments is presented in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended September 30 |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inter- |
|
|
Net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inter- |
|
|
Net |
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
segment |
|
|
income |
|
|
Total |
|
|
segment |
|
|
income |
|
|
|
revenues(a) |
|
|
revenues |
|
|
(loss) |
|
|
revenues(a) |
|
|
revenues |
|
|
(loss) |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
Business
Banking |
|
$ |
108,744 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,707 |
|
|
|
93,573 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
29,559 |
|
|
Commercial
Banking |
|
|
183,407 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,158 |
|
|
|
152,429 |
|
|
|
94 |
|
|
|
59,898 |
|
|
Commercial
Real Estate |
|
|
107,524 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
42,229 |
|
|
|
85,625 |
|
|
|
145 |
|
|
|
35,867 |
|
|
Discretionary
Portfolio |
|
|
1,346 |
|
|
|
(2,894 |
) |
|
|
(10,496 |
) |
|
|
(107,756 |
) |
|
|
(2,616 |
) |
|
|
(78,402 |
) |
|
Residential
Mortgage Banking |
|
|
74,336 |
|
|
|
11,170 |
|
|
|
1,209 |
|
|
|
55,896 |
|
|
|
8,242 |
|
|
|
(17,801 |
) |
|
Retail Banking |
|
|
336,049 |
|
|
|
2,902 |
|
|
|
74,043 |
|
|
|
287,609 |
|
|
|
3,136 |
|
|
|
58,336 |
|
|
All Other |
|
|
14,475 |
|
|
|
(11,192 |
) |
|
|
(54,186 |
) |
|
|
34,580 |
|
|
|
(9,003 |
) |
|
|
3,728 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
825,881 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
127,664 |
|
|
|
601,956 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
91,185 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended September 30 |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inter- |
|
|
Net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inter- |
|
|
Net |
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
segment |
|
|
income |
|
|
Total |
|
|
segment |
|
|
income |
|
|
|
revenues(a) |
|
|
revenues |
|
|
(loss) |
|
|
revenues(a) |
|
|
revenues |
|
|
(loss) |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
Business
Banking |
|
$ |
305,511 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
94,518 |
|
|
|
280,817 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
91,889 |
|
|
Commercial
Banking |
|
|
535,092 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
168,315 |
|
|
|
468,579 |
|
|
|
344 |
|
|
|
180,223 |
|
|
Commercial
Real Estate |
|
|
297,335 |
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
108,669 |
|
|
|
260,176 |
|
|
|
556 |
|
|
|
121,322 |
|
|
Discretionary
Portfolio |
|
|
29,077 |
|
|
|
(9,671 |
) |
|
|
(18,864 |
) |
|
|
(35,489 |
) |
|
|
(11,115 |
) |
|
|
(57,101 |
) |
|
Residential
Mortgage Banking |
|
|
234,363 |
|
|
|
38,041 |
|
|
|
(4,168 |
) |
|
|
187,335 |
|
|
|
34,526 |
|
|
|
(23,162 |
) |
|
Retail Banking |
|
|
933,726 |
|
|
|
8,066 |
|
|
|
180,590 |
|
|
|
882,652 |
|
|
|
9,458 |
|
|
|
196,733 |
|
|
All Other |
|
|
(55,859 |
) |
|
|
(36,489 |
) |
|
|
(285,987 |
) |
|
|
107,213 |
|
|
|
(33,774 |
) |
|
|
(56,258 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
$2,279,245 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
243,073 |
|
|
|
2,151,283 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
453,646 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- 43 -
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED
12. Segment information, continued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average total assets |
|
|
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
Year ended |
|
|
|
September 30 |
|
|
December 31 |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
Business Banking |
|
$ |
4,821 |
|
|
|
4,431 |
|
|
|
4,452 |
|
|
Commercial Banking |
|
|
15,451 |
|
|
|
14,845 |
|
|
|
14,981 |
|
|
Commercial Real Estate |
|
|
12,563 |
|
|
|
11,296 |
|
|
|
11,394 |
|
|
Discretionary
Portfolio |
|
|
13,642 |
|
|
|
14,464 |
|
|
|
14,179 |
|
|
Residential Mortgage
Banking |
|
|
2,619 |
|
|
|
2,692 |
|
|
|
2,660 |
|
|
Retail Banking |
|
|
11,862 |
|
|
|
11,397 |
|
|
|
11,356 |
|
|
All Other |
|
|
6,026 |
|
|
|
6,073 |
|
|
|
6,110 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
66,984 |
|
|
|
65,198 |
|
|
|
65,132 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Total revenues are comprised of net interest income and other income. Net interest income is
the difference between taxable-equivalent interest earned on assets and interest paid on
liabilities owed by a segment and a funding charge (credit) based on the Companys internal
funds transfer and allocation methodology. Segments are charged a cost to fund any assets
(e.g. loans) and are paid a funding credit for any funds provided (e.g. deposits). The
taxable-equivalent adjustment aggregated $5,795,000 and $5,260,000 for the three-month periods
ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, and $15,942,000 and $16,894,000 for the
nine-month periods ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, and is eliminated in All
Other total revenues. Intersegment revenues are included in total revenues of the reportable
segments. The elimination of intersegment revenues is included in the determination of All
Other total revenues. |
13. Relationship with Bayview Lending Group LLC and Bayview Financial Holdings, L.P.
In 2007 M&T invested $300 million to acquire a 20% minority interest in Bayview Lending Group LLC
(BLG), a privately-held company that, together with its affiliates, specializes in originating,
securitizing and servicing small balance commercial real estate loans. M&T recognizes income from
BLG using the equity method of accounting.
Bayview Financial Holdings, L.P. (together with its affiliates, Bayview Financial), a
privately-held specialty mortgage finance company, is BLGs majority investor. In addition to
their common investment in BLG, the Company and Bayview Financial conduct other business activities
with each other. The Company has purchased loan servicing rights for small balance commercial
mortgage loans from BLG and Bayview Financial having outstanding principal balances of $5.7 billion
and $5.9 billion at September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively. Amounts recorded as
capitalized servicing assets for such loans totaled $44 million at September 30, 2009 and $58
million at December 31, 2008. In addition, capitalized servicing rights at September 30, 2009 and
December 31, 2008 also included $20 million and $28 million, respectively, for servicing rights
that were purchased from Bayview Financial related to residential mortgage
- 44 -
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED
13. Relationship with Bayview Lending Group LLC and Bayview Financial Holdings, L.P., continued
loans with outstanding principal balances of $4.1 billion at September 30, 2009 and $4.6 billion at
December 31, 2008. Revenues from servicing residential and small balance commercial mortgage loans
purchased from BLG and Bayview Financial were $12 million and $13 million during the three-month
periods ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, and $38 million and $40 million for the
nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. M&T Bank provided $41 million and $71
million of credit facilities to Bayview Financial at September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008,
respectively, of which $31 million and $57 million were outstanding at September 30, 2009 and
December 31, 2008, respectively. At September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the Company
held $24 million and $32 million, respectively, of collateralized mortgage obligations in its
available-for-sale investment securities portfolio that were securitized by Bayview Financial. In
addition, the Company held $374 million and $412 million of similar investment securities in its
held-to-maturity portfolio at September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively.
- 45 -
|
|
|
Item 2. |
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations. |
Overview
Net income for M&T Bank Corporation (M&T) in the third quarter of 2009 was $128 million or $.97
of diluted earnings per common share, compared with $91 million or $.82 of diluted earnings per
common share in the third quarter of 2008. During the second quarter of 2009, net income was $51
million or $.36 of diluted earnings per common share. Basic earnings per common share were $.97 in
the recent quarter, compared with $.83 in the year-earlier quarter and $.36 in the second quarter
of 2009. The after-tax impact of acquisition and integration-related gains and expenses (included
herein as merger-related expenses) related to 2009 acquisition transactions resulted in income of
$9 million ($15 million pre-tax) or $.08 of basic and diluted earnings per common share in the
third quarter of 2009. Merger-related expenses in the second quarter of 2009 totaled $40 million
($66 million pre-tax) or $.35 of basic and diluted earnings per common share. There were no
merger-related expenses during the third quarter of 2008. For the nine months ended September 30,
2009, net income was $243 million or $1.84 per diluted common share, compared with $454 million or
$4.09 per diluted common share during the corresponding period of 2008. Basic earnings per common
share were $1.84 for the first nine months of 2009, compared with $4.12 in the similar nine-month
period of 2008. The after-tax impact of merger-related gains and expenses was $33 million ($54
million pre-tax) or $.28 of basic and diluted earnings per common share in the nine-month period
ended September 30, 2009. Similar merger-related expenses associated with late-2007 acquisitions
were $2 million ($4 million pre-tax) or $.02 of basic and diluted earnings per common share in the
first nine months of 2008.
The annualized rate of return on average total assets for M&T and its consolidated
subsidiaries (the Company) in the recent quarter was .73%, compared with .56% in the third
quarter of 2008 and .31% in the second quarter of 2009. The annualized rate of return on average
common stockholders equity was 6.72% in the third quarter of 2009, compared with 5.66% in the
year-earlier quarter and 2.53% in 2009s second quarter. During the first nine months of 2009, the
annualized rates of return on average assets and average common stockholders equity were .49% and
4.35%, respectively, compared with .93% and 9.37%, respectively, in the similar 2008 period.
Several noteworthy items are reflected in M&Ts third quarter 2009 results. On August 28,
2009 M&T Bank, M&Ts principal banking subsidiary, entered into a purchase and assumption agreement
with the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) to assume all of the deposits and acquire
certain assets of Bradford Bank (Bradford), Baltimore, Maryland. As part of the transaction, M&T
Bank entered into a loss-share arrangement with the FDIC whereby M&T Bank will be reimbursed by the
FDIC for most losses it incurs on the acquired loan portfolio. Assets acquired in the transaction
totaled approximately $469 million, including $302 million of loans, and liabilities assumed
aggregated $440 million, including $361 million of deposits. In accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), M&T Bank
recorded an after-tax gain on the transaction of $18 million ($29 million before taxes) during the
recent quarter. Merger-related expenses associated with this transaction and with M&Ts second quarter
acquisition of Provident Bankshares Corporation (Provident) totaled $9 million, after applicable
tax effect, in the recent quarter. Also reflected in M&Ts third quarter 2009 results were $29
million of after-tax other-than-temporary impairment charges ($47 million before taxes) on certain
available-for-sale investment securities. Specifically, such charges related to certain privately
issued collateralized mortgage obligations (CMOs) backed by residential real estate loans and
collateralized debt obligations (CDOs)
- 46 -
backed by pooled trust preferred securities of financial institutions. However, because those investment securities were previously reflected at fair
value on the consolidated balance sheet, the impairment charges did not reduce stockholders
equity. Finally, M&Ts results benefited from a $10 million reversal of accrued income taxes for
previously uncertain tax positions in various jurisdictions. The overall impact of the items
described herein was to reduce M&Ts third quarter 2009 net income by approximately $9 million, or
$.08 of diluted earnings per common share.
On May 23, 2009, M&T completed the acquisition of Provident, a bank holding company based in
Baltimore, Maryland. Provident Bank, Providents banking subsidiary, was merged into M&T Bank on
that date. The results of operations acquired in the Provident transaction have been included in
the Companys financial results since May 23, 2009. Provident common shareholders received .171625
shares of M&T common stock in exchange for each share of Provident common stock, resulting in M&T
issuing a total of 5,838,308 common shares in connection with the acquisition. In addition, based
on the merger agreement, outstanding and unexercised options to purchase common stock of Provident
converted to options to purchase the common stock of M&T. The fair value of those options was
approximately $1 million. In total, the purchase price was approximately $274 million based on the
fair value on the acquisition date of M&T common stock exchanged and the fair value of the options
to purchase M&T common stock. Holders of Providents preferred stock were issued shares of new
Series B and Series C Preferred Stock of M&T having substantially identical terms. That preferred
stock added $156 million to M&Ts stockholders equity. The Series B Preferred Stock has a
preference value of $27 million, pays non-cumulative dividends at a rate of 10%, and is convertible
into 433,148 shares of M&T common stock. The Series C Preferred Stock has a preference value of
$152 million, pays cumulative dividends at a rate of 5% through November 2013 and 9% thereafter,
and is held by the U.S. Department of Treasury under the Troubled Asset Relief Program Capital
Purchase Program.
The Provident transaction has been accounted for using the acquisition method of accounting.
Accordingly, the assets acquired and liabilities assumed were recorded by M&T at their estimated
fair values as of the acquisition date. Assets acquired totaled $6.3 billion, including $4.0
billion of loans and leases (including approximately $1.7 billion of commercial real estate loans,
$1.4 billion of consumer loans, $700 million of commercial loans and leases and $300 million of
residential real estate loans) and $1.0 billion of investment securities. Liabilities assumed were
$5.9 billion, including $5.1 billion of deposits. The transaction added $436 million to M&Ts
stockholders equity, including $280 million of common equity and $156 million of preferred equity.
In connection with the acquisition, the Company recorded $332 million of goodwill and $63 million
of core deposit intangible. The core deposit intangible is being amortized over seven years using
an accelerated method. The acquisition of Provident expands the Companys presence in the
Mid-Atlantic area, gives the Company the second largest deposit share in Maryland, and tripled the
Companys presence in Virginia. The previously described transaction to acquire certain assets and
liabilities of Bradford was also accounted for using the acquisition method of accounting.
Application of the acquisition method requires that acquired loans be recorded at fair value
and prohibits the carry over of the acquired entitys allowance for credit losses. Determining the
fair value of the acquired loans required estimating cash flows expected to be collected on the
loans. The impact of estimated credit losses on all acquired loans was considered in the
estimation of future cash flows used in the determination of estimated fair value as of the
acquisition date.
- 47 -
Merger-related expenses associated with the acquisition of Provident incurred during the
quarter ended June 30, 2009 totaled $66 million ($40 million after tax effect). Such expenses were
for professional services and other temporary help fees associated with the conversion of systems
and/or integration of operations; costs related to branch and office consolidations; costs related
to termination of existing Provident contractual arrangements for various services; initial
marketing and promotion expenses designed to introduce M&T Bank to Providents customers; severance
and incentive compensation costs; travel costs; and printing, supplies and other costs of
commencing operations in new markets and offices. Additional information about the
acquisition of Provident is provided in note 2 of Notes to Financial Statements.
The condition of the residential real estate marketplace and the U.S. economy since 2007 has
had a significant impact on the financial services industry as a whole, and specifically on the
financial results of the Company. A pronounced downturn in the residential real estate market that
began in early 2007 has resulted in significantly lower residential real estate values and higher
delinquencies and charge-offs of loans, including loans to builders and developers of residential
real estate. During 2009, the Company has experienced higher delinquencies and charge-offs related
to its commercial loan and commercial real estate loan portfolios as well. Additionally,
investment securities backed by residential and commercial real estate have reflected substantial
unrealized losses due to a lack of liquidity in the financial markets and anticipated credit
losses. Many financial institutions, including the Company, have taken charges for those
unrealized losses that were deemed to be other than temporary.
The Companys financial results for the second quarter of 2009 were adversely impacted by
certain events. During that quarter, the FDIC announced that it would levy a special assessment on
insured financial institutions to rebuild the Deposit Insurance Fund. That special assessment
amounted to $33 million ($20 million after tax effect, or $.17 of diluted earnings per common
share). Also during the second quarter of 2009, other-than-temporary impairment charges of $25
million (pre-tax) were recorded on certain privately issued CMOs backed by residential real estate
loans and CDOs backed by pooled trust preferred securities of financial institutions. Such
securities are held in the Companys available-for-sale investment securities portfolio. Those
charges reduced net income and diluted earnings per common share by $15 million and $.13,
respectively.
Results recorded by the Company in the third quarter of 2008 were affected by two noteworthy
events. During that quarter, a $153 million (pre-tax) other-than-temporary impairment charge was
recorded related to preferred stock issuances of the Federal National Mortgage Association (Fannie
Mae) and the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (Freddie Mac). The write-down was taken on
preferred stock with a basis of $162 million following the U.S. Governments placement of Fannie
Mae and Freddie Mac under conservatorship on September 7, 2008. As a result of the impairment
charge and the recognition of available income tax benefits, M&Ts reported net income in the third
quarter of 2008 was reduced by $97 million, or $.88 of diluted earnings per common share. Also
during that quarter, the Company resolved certain tax issues related to its activities in various
jurisdictions during the years 1999-2007. As a result, the Company paid $40 million to settle
those issues, but was able to reduce previously accrued income tax expense in 2008s third quarter
by $40 million, thereby adding $.36 to diluted earnings per common share.
- 48 -
Supplemental Reporting of Non-GAAP Results of Operations
As a result of business combinations and other acquisitions, the Company had intangible assets
consisting of goodwill and core deposit and other intangible assets totaling $3.7 billion at
September 30, 2009, compared with $3.4 billion at each of September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2008.
Included in such intangible assets was goodwill of $3.5 billion at September 30, 2009 and $3.2
billion at each of September 30 and December 31, 2008. Amortization of core deposit and other
intangible assets, after tax effect, totaled $10 million ($.09 per diluted common share) during
each of the third quarters of 2009 and 2008, and $9 million ($.08 per diluted common share) during
the second quarter of 2009. For the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2009 and 2008,
amortization of core deposit and other intangible assets, after tax effect, totaled $29 million
($.25 per diluted common share) and $31 million ($.28 per diluted common share), respectively.
M&T consistently provides supplemental reporting of its results on a net operating or
tangible basis, from which M&T excludes the after-tax effect of amortization of core deposit and
other intangible assets (and the related goodwill, core deposit intangible and other intangible
asset balances, net of applicable deferred tax amounts) and gains and expenses associated with
merging acquired operations into the Company, since such items are considered by management to be
nonoperating in nature. Although net operating income as defined by M&T is not a GAAP measure,
M&Ts management believes that this information helps investors understand the effect of
acquisition activity in reported results.
Net operating income was $129 million in the third quarter of 2009, compared with $101 million
in the year-earlier quarter. Diluted net operating earnings per common share for the recent
quarter were $.98, compared with $.91 in the third quarter of 2008. Net operating income and
diluted net operating earnings per common share were $101 million and $.79, respectively, in the
second quarter of 2009. For the first nine months of 2009, net operating income and diluted net
operating earnings per common share were $305 million and $2.37, respectively, compared with $487
million and $4.39 in the corresponding 2008 period.
Net operating income expressed as an annualized rate of return on average tangible assets was
..78% in the recently completed quarter, compared with .65% in the third quarter of 2008 and .64% in
2009s second quarter. Net operating income expressed as an annualized return on average tangible
common equity was 14.87% in the recent quarter, compared with 13.17% in the third quarter of 2008
and 12.08% in the second quarter of 2009. For the nine-month period ended September 30, 2009, net
operating income represented an annualized return on average tangible assets and average tangible
common stockholders equity of .64% and 12.19%, respectively, compared with 1.05% and 21.10%,
respectively, in the similar 2008 period.
Reconciliations of GAAP amounts with corresponding non-GAAP amounts are provided in table 2.
Taxable-equivalent Net Interest Income
Taxable-equivalent net interest income aggregated $553 million in the third quarter of 2009, 12%
higher than $493 million in the year-earlier quarter and 9% above $507 million in the second
quarter of 2009. The improvement from 2008s third quarter reflects a 22 basis point (hundredths
of one percent) widening of the Companys net interest margin, or taxable-equivalent net interest
income expressed as an annualized percentage of average earning assets, and higher average earning
assets, which increased $2.9 billion, or 5%, to $60.9 billion from $58.0 billion in the third
quarter of 2008. The Companys net interest
- 49 -
margin was 3.61% in the third quarter of 2009, compared with 3.39% in the third quarter of 2008.
The growth in taxable-equivalent net interest income from the second quarter of 2009 was due to an
18 basis point improvement in the net interest margin and higher earning asset balances, which rose
$1.6 billion from 2009s second quarter. The most significant factors for the higher
recent-quarter net interest margin as compared with the previous quarters were lower interest rates
paid on deposits and long-term borrowings. The higher average earning asset level in the recent
quarter resulted from the full-quarter impact of earning assets obtained in the Provident
transaction, which at acquisition date totaled approximately $5.1 billion.
For the first nine months of 2009, taxable-equivalent net interest income was $1.51 billion,
up 3% from $1.47 billion in the corresponding period of 2008. Contributing to that improvement
were growth in average earning assets, which rose $1.2 billion, or 2%, and a widening of the
Companys net interest margin of 3 basis points, to 3.41% in 2009 from 3.38% in 2008. The increase
in average earning assets was due to the Provident acquisition and the improved net interest margin
resulted from lower interest rates paid on deposits and borrowings.
Average loans and leases rose $3.8 billion, or 8%, to $52.3 billion in the recently completed
quarter from $48.5 billion in the third quarter of 2008. Included in average loans and leases in
the recent quarter were loans obtained in the Provident acquisition, which added approximately $3.9
billion to the average loan and lease total. The impact of the loans obtained in the Bradford
transaction on average loan and lease balances in the recent quarter was not significant. Average
commercial loan and lease balances were $13.8 billion in the recent quarter, compared with $13.9
billion in 2008s third quarter. The impact of such loans acquired from Provident added
approximately $600 million to the recent quarters average total. Offsetting that impact was a
decline in average automobile floor plan loans of approximately $386 million, along with generally
lower demand for commercial loans. Commercial real estate loans averaged $20.8 billion in the
third quarter of 2009, up $2.3 billion or 12% from $18.6 billion in the year-earlier quarter, and
reflected loans obtained from Provident averaging approximately $1.7 billion in the recent quarter.
Average outstanding residential real estate loans increased $465 million or 9% to $5.4 billion in
the recently completed quarter from $5.0 billion in the third quarter of 2008. Included in that
portfolio were loans held for sale, which averaged $613 million in the recent quarter, compared
with $493 million in the third quarter of 2008. Residential real estate loans acquired in the
Provident transaction averaged approximately $266 million in the third quarter of 2009. Consumer
loans averaged $12.2 billion in the third quarter of 2009, $1.2 billion or 11% higher than $11.1
billion in the year-earlier quarter. That growth was due to loans obtained from Provident, which
averaged approximately $1.4 billion (largely home equity loans and lines of credit), and higher
outstanding balances of home equity lines of credit, partially offset by declines in average
outstanding automobile and home equity loan balances.
Average outstanding loan balances grew $1.8 billion, or 3% from the second to the third
quarter of 2009, largely due to the full-quarter impact of loans acquired in the Provident
transaction. Excluding Provident-related loans, total average loans in the recent quarter declined
approximately $400 million from the second quarter of 2009. That decline was the result of lower
average commercial loan balances, partially offset by growth in average commercial real estate
loans outstanding. The following table summarizes quarterly changes in the major components of the
loan and lease portfolio.
- 50 -
AVERAGE LOANS AND LEASES
(net of unearned discount)
Dollars in millions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent increase |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(decrease) from |
|
|
|
3rd Qtr. |
|
|
3rd Qtr. |
|
|
2nd Qtr. |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Commercial, financial, etc. |
|
$ |
13,801 |
|
|
|
(1 |
)% |
|
|
(2 |
)% |
Real estate commercial |
|
|
20,843 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
Real estate consumer |
|
|
5,429 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
Consumer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Automobile |
|
|
3,127 |
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
Home equity lines |
|
|
5,763 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
Home equity loans |
|
|
1,066 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
Other |
|
|
2,291 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total consumer |
|
|
12,247 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
52,320 |
|
|
|
8 |
% |
|
|
3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the first nine months of 2009, average loans and leases aggregated $50.6 billion, up $1.7
billion or 4% from $48.9 billion in the similar 2008 period. That growth was predominantly the
result of loans obtained from Provident. Excluding the impact of loans acquired from Provident,
higher average commercial real estate loan balances were more than offset by declines in average
outstanding balances of residential real estate loans (due largely to securitization transactions
in June and July of 2008) and consumer loans.
The investment securities portfolio averaged $8.4 billion in the recent quarter, down $883
million or 9% from $9.3 billion in the year-earlier quarter. That decline largely reflects
paydowns of mortgage-backed securities, partially offset by the investment securities obtained in
the Provident transaction. Provident-related securities increased average investment securities
balances in the recent quarter by approximately $1.0 billion. Average investment securities
balances in the third quarter of 2009 were down 1% from the second quarter of 2009, as the impact
of paydowns was offset by the full-quarter effect of the investment securities acquired from
Provident. For the first nine months of 2009 and 2008, average investment securities were $8.5
billion and $9.0 billion, respectively.
The investment securities portfolio is largely comprised of residential mortgage-backed
securities and CMOs, debt securities issued by municipalities, debt and preferred equity securities
issued by government-sponsored agencies and certain financial institutions, and shorter-term U.S.
Treasury and federal agency notes. When purchasing investment securities, the Company considers
its overall interest-rate risk profile as well as the adequacy of expected returns relative to the
risks assumed, including prepayments. In managing the investment securities portfolio, the Company
occasionally sells investment securities as a result of changes in interest rates and spreads,
actual or anticipated prepayments, credit risk associated with a particular security, or as a
result of restructuring its investment securities portfolio following completion of a business
combination.
The Company regularly reviews its investment securities for declines in value below amortized
cost that might be characterized as other than temporary. As previously discussed, an
other-than-temporary impairment charge of $47 million (pre-tax) was recognized in the third quarter
of 2009 related to certain privately issued CMOs and CDOs held in the Companys available-for-sale
investment securities portfolio. During the second quarter of 2009, an other-than-temporary
impairment charge of $25 million (pre-tax) was recognized on certain privately issued CMOs and
CDOs. Finally, during 2008s third quarter, the Company recognized other-than-temporary impairment
charges of $153 million (pre-tax) related to its holdings of preferred stock of Fannie Mae and
Freddie Mac. Poor economic conditions, high unemployment and declining real estate values are
significant factors contributing to the recognition of the other-
- 51 -
than-temporary impairment charges. As of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the
Company concluded that the remaining declines associated with the rest of the investment securities
portfolio were temporary in nature. That conclusion was based on managements assessment of future
cash flows associated with individual investment securities as of each respective date. A further
discussion of fair values of investment securities is included herein under the heading Capital.
Additional information about the investment securities portfolio is included in notes 3 and 10 of
Notes to Financial Statements.
Other earning assets include deposits at banks, trading account assets, federal funds sold and
agreements to resell securities. Those other earning assets in the aggregate averaged $160
million, $191 million and $235 million for the quarters ended September 30, 2009, September 30,
2008 and June 30, 2009, respectively. For the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2009 and
2008, average balances of other earning assets were $197 million and $192 million, respectively.
The amounts of investment securities and other earning assets held by the Company are influenced by
such factors as demand for loans, which generally yield more than investment securities and other
earning assets, ongoing repayments, the level of deposits, and management of balance sheet size and
resulting capital ratios.
As a result of the changes described herein, average earning assets aggregated $60.9 billion
in the third quarter of 2009, compared with $58.0 billion in the year-earlier quarter. Average
earning assets were $59.3 billion in the second quarter of 2009 and totaled $59.2 billion and $58.0
billion for the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
The most significant source of funding for the Company is core deposits, which are comprised
of noninterest-bearing deposits, nonbrokered interest-bearing transaction accounts, nonbrokered
savings deposits and nonbrokered domestic time deposits under $100,000. The Companys branch
network is its principal source of core deposits, which generally carry lower interest rates than
wholesale funds of comparable maturities. Certificates of deposit under $100,000 generated on a
nationwide basis by M&T Bank, National Association (M&T Bank, N.A.), a wholly owned banking
subsidiary of M&T, are also included in core deposits. Average core deposits totaled $40.9 billion
in the third quarter of 2009, compared with $31.6 billion in the year-earlier quarter and $38.2
billion in the second quarter of 2009. The acquisition of Provident added approximately $1.4
billion and $3.0 billion to average core deposits during the quarters ended June 30 and September
30, 2009, respectively. Excluding deposits obtained in the Provident transaction,
the growth in core deposits since the third quarter of 2008 was due, in part, to the impact on the
attractiveness of alternative investments to the Companys customers resulting from lower
interest rates and the continuing recessionary environment in the U.S. During the
declining interest rate environment, over the last twelve months the Company has also experienced a
shift in customer savings trends, as average time deposits have continued to decline, while average
noninterest-bearing deposits and savings deposits have increased. The following table provides an
analysis of quarterly changes in the components of average core deposits. For the nine-month
periods ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, core deposits averaged $38.0 billion and $31.3 billion,
respectively.
AVERAGE CORE DEPOSITS
Dollars in millions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent increase from |
|
|
|
3rd Qtr. |
|
|
3rd Qtr. |
|
|
2nd Qtr. |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
NOW accounts |
|
$ |
532 |
|
|
|
10 |
% |
|
|
6 |
% |
Savings deposits |
|
|
22,667 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
Time deposits less than $100,000 |
|
|
5,591 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Noninterest-bearing deposits |
|
|
12,122 |
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
40,912 |
|
|
|
29 |
% |
|
|
7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- 52 -
Domestic time deposits of $100,000 or more, deposits originated through the Companys offshore
branch office, and brokered deposits provide additional sources of funding for the Company.
Domestic time deposits over $100,000, excluding brokered certificates of deposit, averaged $2.5
billion in the third quarter of 2009, compared with $2.4 billion and $2.7 billion in the
year-earlier quarter and the second quarter of 2009, respectively. Offshore branch deposits,
primarily comprised of balances of $100,000 or more, averaged $1.4 billion, $3.8 billion and $1.5
billion for the three-month periods ended September 30, 2009, September 30, 2008 and June 30, 2009,
respectively. Brokered time deposits averaged $1.1 billion in the recent quarter, compared with
$1.5 billion in the third quarter of 2008 and $697 million in 2009s second quarter. Reflected in
average brokered time deposits in the two most recent quarters were deposits obtained in the
Provident transaction, which added approximately $1.0 billion and $500 million to average brokered
time deposits during the quarters ended September 30 and June 30, 2009, respectively. In
connection with the Companys management of interest rate risk, interest rate swap agreements have
been entered into under which the Company receives a fixed rate of interest and pays a variable
rate and that have notional amounts and terms substantially similar to the amounts and terms of $25
million of brokered time deposits. The Company also had brokered NOW and brokered money-market
deposit accounts, which in the aggregate averaged $709 million during 2009s third quarter,
compared with $179 million and $842 million during the corresponding quarter of 2008 and second
quarter of 2009, respectively. The significant increase in such average brokered deposit balances
in the two most recent quarters as compared with the third quarter of 2008 was the result of demand
for such deposits, largely resulting from the uncertain economic markets and the desire of
brokerage firms to earn reasonable yields while ensuring that customer deposits were fully insured.
Offshore branch deposits and brokered deposits have been used by the Company as alternatives to
short-term borrowings. Additional amounts of offshore branch deposits or brokered deposits may be
added in the future depending on market conditions, including demand by customers and other
investors for those deposits, and the cost of funds available from alternative sources at the time.
The Company also uses borrowings from banks, securities dealers, various Federal Home Loan
Banks (FHLBs), the Federal Reserve and others as sources of funding. Short-term borrowings
averaged $2.7 billion in the recently completed quarter, compared with $5.4 billion in the third
quarter of 2008 and $3.2 billion in the second quarter of 2009. Included in short-term borrowings
were unsecured federal funds borrowings, which generally mature daily and averaged $1.8 billion in
the third quarter of 2009, $4.4 billion in the year-earlier quarter and $1.6 billion in the second
quarter of 2009. Overnight federal funds borrowings represent the largest component of short-term
borrowings and are obtained daily from a wide variety of banks and other financial institutions.
Average short-term borrowings during the recent quarter included $673 million of borrowings from
the FHLBs of New York and Atlanta, compared with $239 million and $902 million in the third quarter
of 2008 and second quarter of 2009, respectively. Also included in short-term borrowings were
secured borrowings with the Federal Reserve through their Term Auction Facility (TAF).
Borrowings under the TAF averaged $11 million in each of the third quarters of 2009 and 2008 and
$604 million in the second quarter of 2009. There were no outstanding borrowings under the TAF at
September 30, 2009. Additionally, in the third quarter of 2008 short-term borrowings included a
$500 million revolving asset-backed structured borrowing secured by automobile loans. That
borrowing was repaid during the final quarter of 2008. All of the available amount of that
structured borrowing was in use during 2008s third quarter.
Long-term borrowings averaged $11.0 billion in the recent quarter, compared with $12.7 billion
and $11.5 billion in the three-month periods ended September 30, 2008 and June 30, 2009,
respectively. Included in
- 53 -
average long-term borrowings were amounts borrowed from the FHLBs totaling $6.1 billion in the
recent quarter, $7.7 billion in the third quarter of 2008 and $6.5 billion in the second quarter of
2009, and subordinated capital notes of $1.8 billion in the recent quarter and $1.9 billion in each
of the third quarter of 2008 and the second 2009 quarter. Junior subordinated debentures
associated with trust preferred securities that were included in average long-term borrowings were
$1.2 billion in the recent quarter and $1.1 billion in each of the quarters ended September 30,
2008 and June 30, 2009. Information regarding trust preferred securities and the related junior
subordinated debentures is provided in note 4 of Notes to Financial Statements. Also included in
long-term borrowings were agreements to repurchase securities, which averaged $1.6 billion in each
of the quarters ended September 30, 2009, September 30, 2008 and June 30, 2009. The agreements
have various repurchase dates through 2017, however, the contractual maturities of the underlying
securities extend beyond such repurchase dates.
Changes in the composition of the Companys earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities as
discussed herein, as well as changes in interest rates and spreads, can impact net interest income.
Net interest spread, or the difference between the taxable-equivalent yield on earning assets and
the rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities, was 3.34% in the third quarter of 2009, compared
with 3.04% in the third quarter of 2008 and 3.15% in the second quarter of 2009. The yield on
earning assets during the recent quarter was 4.60%, down 94 basis points from 5.54% in the
corresponding quarter of 2008, while the rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities decreased 124
basis points to 1.26% from 2.50%. In the second quarter of 2009, the yield on earning assets was
4.62% and the rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities was 1.47%. As compared with the third
quarter of 2008, the lower rates in the two most recent quarters resulted from the Federal Reserve
lowering its benchmark overnight federal funds target rate throughout 2008 seven times, such that,
at June 30 and September 30, 2009, the Federal Reserves target rate for overnight federal funds
was expressed as a range from 0% to .25%. The 30 basis point improvement in spread from the third
quarter of 2008 to the recent quarter was due, in part, to more significant declines in deposit and
borrowing rates than in rates earned on assets. The recent quarters 19 basis point improvement in
spread from the second quarter of 2009 was largely attributable to declines in the rates paid on
deposits and long-term borrowings. For the first nine months of 2009, the net interest spread was
3.13%, up 13 basis points from the year-earlier period. That improvement was due, in part, to more
significant declines in borrowing rates than in rates earned on assets. The yield on earning
assets and the rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities were 4.62% and 1.49%, respectively, for
the nine-month period ended September 30, 2009, compared with 5.80% and 2.80%, respectively, in the
similar period of 2008.
Net interest-free funds consist largely of noninterest-bearing demand deposits and
stockholders equity, partially offset by bank owned life insurance and non-earning assets,
including goodwill and core deposit and other intangible assets. Net interest-free funds averaged
$12.6 billion in the third quarter of 2009, compared with $8.1 billion in the third quarter of 2008
and $11.3 billion in the second quarter of 2009. The increases in average net interest-free funds
from the second to the third quarter of 2009 and in the two most recent quarters as compared with
the third quarter of 2008 were largely the result of higher average balances of noninterest-bearing
deposits. Such deposits averaged $12.1 billion in the recent quarter, up $4.4 billion from the
year-earlier period and $1.6 billion or 15% higher than in the second quarter of 2009. In
connection with the acquisition of Provident, the Company added noninterest-bearing deposits of
$939 million on May 23, 2009. During the first nine months of 2009 and 2008, average net
interest-free funds were $11.1 billion and $8.0 billion, respectively, reflecting higher
noninterest-bearing deposits in the 2009
- 54 -
period.
Goodwill and core deposit and other intangible assets averaged $3.7 billion in the
recent quarter, compared with $3.4 billion during the third quarter of 2008 and $3.5 billion during
the second quarter of 2009. As already noted, goodwill and core deposit intangible
resulting from the Provident transaction totaled $332 million and $63 million, respectively, on the
acquisition date. The cash surrender value of bank owned life insurance averaged $1.4 billion
during the recent quarter, compared with $1.2 billion and $1.3 billion during 2008s third quarter
and the second quarter of 2009, respectively. Increases in the cash surrender value of bank owned
life insurance are not included in interest income, but rather are recorded in other revenues from
operations.
The contribution of net interest-free funds to net interest margin was .27% in the third
quarter of 2009, compared with .35% in the year-earlier quarter and .28% in the second quarter of
2009. For the first nine months of 2009 and 2008, the contribution of net interest-free funds to
net interest margin was .28% and .38%, respectively. The decline in the contribution to net
interest margin ascribed to net interest-free funds in the 2009 periods as compared to the
corresponding 2008 periods resulted largely from the impact of lower interest rates on
interest-bearing liabilities used to value such contribution.
Reflecting the changes to the net interest spread and the contribution of interest-free funds
as described herein, the Companys net interest margin was 3.61% in the recent quarter, improved
from 3.39% in the third quarter of 2008 and from 3.43% in the second quarter of 2009. During the
nine-month periods ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, the net interest margin was 3.41% and 3.38%,
respectively. Future changes in market interest rates or spreads, as well as changes in the
composition of the Companys portfolios of earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities that
result in reductions in spreads, could adversely impact the Companys net interest income and net
interest margin.
Management assesses the potential impact of future changes in interest rates and spreads by
projecting net interest income under several interest rate scenarios. In managing interest rate
risk, the Company has utilized interest rate swap agreements to modify the repricing
characteristics of certain portions of its portfolios of earning assets and interest-bearing
liabilities. Periodic settlement amounts arising from these agreements are generally reflected in
either the yields earned on assets or the rates paid on interest-bearing liabilities. The notional
amount of interest rate swap agreements entered into for interest rate risk management purposes was
approximately $1.1 billion at each of September 30, 2009, September 30, 2008, December 31, 2008 and
June 30, 2009. Under the terms of those swap agreements, the Company received payments based on
the outstanding notional amount of the swap agreements at fixed rates and made payments at variable
rates. Those swap agreements were designated as fair value hedges of certain fixed rate time
deposits and long-term borrowings. There were no interest rate swap agreements designated as cash
flow hedges at those respective dates.
The estimated aggregate fair value of interest rate swap agreements designated as fair value
hedges represented gains of approximately $83 million, $5 million, $64 million and $146 million at
September 30, 2009, September 30, 2008, June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008. The significant rise
in fair value of those interest rate swap agreements since September 30, 2008 resulted from sharply
lower interest rates at those later dates. The decline in fair value at the two most recent
quarter-ends as compared with December 31, 2008 was attributable to higher interest rates at the
end of those 2009 quarter-ends. The fair values of such swap agreements were substantially offset
by changes in the fair values of the hedged items. As a result, the amounts of hedge
ineffectiveness recognized during the three- and
- 55 -
nine-month periods ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 were not material to the Companys
results of operations. The changes in the fair values of the interest rate swap agreements and the
hedged items result from the effects of changing interest rates. The Companys credit exposure
with respect to the estimated fair value as of September 30, 2009 of interest rate swap agreements
used for managing interest rate risk has been substantially mitigated through master netting
arrangements with trading account interest rate contracts with the same counterparties as well as
counterparty postings of $54 million of collateral with the Company.
The weighted-average rates to be received and paid under interest rate swap agreements
currently in effect were 6.30% and 2.19%, respectively, at September 30, 2009. The average
notional amounts of interest rate swap agreements entered into for risk management purposes, the
related effect on net interest income and margin, and the weighted-average interest rates paid or
received on those swap agreements are presented in the accompanying table. Additional information
about the Companys use of interest rate swap agreements and other derivatives is included in note
9 of Notes to Financial Statements.
INTEREST RATE SWAP AGREEMENTS
Dollars in thousands
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended September 30 |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Rate (a) |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Rate (a) |
|
Increase (decrease) in: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
% |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
% |
Interest expense |
|
|
(10,296 |
) |
|
|
(.08 |
) |
|
|
(5,001 |
) |
|
|
(.04 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest
income/margin |
|
$ |
10,296 |
|
|
|
.07 |
% |
|
$ |
5,001 |
|
|
|
.04 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average notional
amount |
|
$ |
1,062,241 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,120,556 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rate received (b) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.26 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.31 |
% |
Rate paid (b) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.41 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.54 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended September 30 |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Rate (a) |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Rate (a) |
|
Increase (decrease) in: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
% |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
% |
Interest expense |
|
|
(27,230 |
) |
|
|
(.08 |
) |
|
|
(11,342 |
) |
|
|
(.03 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest
income/margin |
|
$ |
27,230 |
|
|
|
.06 |
% |
|
$ |
11,342 |
|
|
|
.02 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average notional
amount |
|
$ |
1,085,483 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,323,336 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rate received (b) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.34 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.09 |
% |
Rate paid (b) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.99 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.94 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Computed as an annualized percentage of average earning assets or
interest-bearing liabilities. |
|
(b) |
|
Weighted-average rate paid or received on interest rate swap agreements
in effect during the period. |
As a financial intermediary, the Company is exposed to various risks, including liquidity and
market risk. Liquidity refers to the Companys ability to ensure that sufficient cash flow and
liquid assets are available to satisfy current and future obligations, including demands for loans
and deposit withdrawals, funding operating costs, and other corporate purposes. Liquidity risk
arises whenever the maturities of financial instruments included in assets and liabilities differ.
M&Ts banking subsidiaries have
- 56 -
access to additional funding sources through borrowings from the FHLB of New York, lines of
credit with the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, and other available borrowing facilities. The
Company has, from time to time, issued subordinated capital notes to provide liquidity and enhance
regulatory capital ratios. Such notes qualify for inclusion in the Companys total capital as
defined by Federal regulators.
The Company has informal and sometimes reciprocal sources of funding available through various
arrangements for unsecured short-term borrowings from a wide group of banks and other financial
institutions. Overnight federal funds borrowings aggregated $2.2 billion, $1.5 billion and $809
million at September 30, 2009, September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2008, respectively. In general,
these borrowings were unsecured and matured on the following business day. As already noted,
offshore branch deposits and brokered certificates of deposit have been used by the Company as
alternatives to short-term borrowings. Offshore branch deposits also generally mature on the next
business day and totaled $1.3 billion at September 30, 2009, $5.8 billion at September 30, 2008 and
$4.0 billion at December 31, 2008. Outstanding brokered time deposits at each of September 30,
2009 and September 30, 2008 were $1.1 billion, compared with $487 million at December 31, 2008.
Such deposits at September 30, 2009 included $910 million of brokered time deposits obtained in the
acquisition of Provident. At September 30, 2009, the weighted-average remaining term to maturity
of brokered time deposits was 20 months. Certain of these brokered time deposits have provisions
that allow for early redemption.
The Companys ability to obtain funding from these or other sources could be negatively
impacted should the Company experience a substantial deterioration in its financial condition or
its debt ratings, or should the availability of short-term funding become restricted due to a
disruption in the financial markets. The Company attempts to quantify such credit-event risk by
modeling scenarios that estimate the liquidity impact resulting from a short-term ratings downgrade
over various grading levels. Such impact is estimated by attempting to measure the effect on
available unsecured lines of credit, available capacity from secured borrowing sources and
securitizable assets. In addition to deposits and borrowings, other sources of liquidity include
maturities of investment securities and other earning assets, repayments of loans and investment
securities, and cash generated from operations, such as fees collected for services.
Certain customers of the Company obtain financing through the issuance of variable rate demand
bonds (VRDBs). The VRDBs are generally enhanced by direct-pay letters of credit provided by M&T
Bank. M&T Bank oftentimes acts as remarketing agent for the VRDBs and, at its discretion, may from
time-to-time own some of the VRDBs while such instruments are remarketed. When this occurs, the
VRDBs are classified as trading assets in the Companys consolidated balance sheet. Nevertheless,
M&T Bank is not contractually obligated to purchase the VRDBs. The value of VRDBs in the Companys
trading account totaled $45 million and $136 million at September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively,
and $29 million at December 31, 2008. The total amount of VRDBs outstanding backed by M&T Bank
letters of credit was approximately $1.9 billion at each of September 30, 2009, September 30, 2008
and December 31, 2008. M&T Bank also serves as remarketing agent for most of those bonds.
The Company enters into contractual obligations in the normal course of business which require
future cash payments. Such obligations include, among others, payments related to deposits,
borrowings, leases and other contractual commitments. Off-balance sheet commitments to customers
may impact liquidity, including commitments to extend credit, standby letters of credit, commercial
letters of credit, financial guarantees and indemnification contracts, and commitments to sell real
estate loans. Because many of these commitments or contracts expire without being funded in
- 57 -
whole or in part, the contract amounts are not necessarily indicative of future cash flows.
Further information relating to these commitments is provided in note 11 of Notes to Financial
Statements.
M&Ts primary source of funds to pay for operating expenses, shareholder dividends and
treasury stock repurchases has historically been the receipt of dividends from its banking
subsidiaries, which are subject to various regulatory limitations. Dividends from any banking
subsidiary to M&T are limited by the amount of earnings of the banking subsidiary in the current
year and the two preceding years. For purposes of that test, at September 30, 2009 approximately
$1.0 billion was available for payment of dividends to M&T from banking subsidiaries without prior
regulatory approval. These historic sources of cash flow have been augmented in the past by the
issuance of trust preferred securities and senior notes payable. Information regarding trust
preferred securities and the related junior subordinated debentures is included in note 4 of Notes
to Financial Statements. M&T also maintains a $30 million line of credit with an unaffiliated
commercial bank, of which there were no borrowings outstanding at September 30, 2009 or at December
31, 2008.
Management closely monitors the Companys liquidity position on an ongoing basis for
compliance with internal policies and believes that available sources of liquidity are adequate to
meet funding needs anticipated in the normal course of business. Management does not anticipate
engaging in any activities, either currently or in the long-term, for which adequate funding would
not be available and would therefore result in a significant strain on liquidity at either M&T or
its subsidiary banks.
Market risk is the risk of loss from adverse changes in market prices and/or interest rates of
the Companys financial instruments. The primary market risk the Company is exposed to is interest
rate risk. Interest rate risk arises from the Companys core banking activities of lending and
deposit-taking, because assets and liabilities reprice at different times and by different amounts
as interest rates change. As a result, net interest income earned by the Company is subject to the
effects of changing interest rates. The Company measures interest rate risk by calculating the
variability of net interest income in future periods under various interest rate scenarios using
projected balances for earning assets, interest-bearing liabilities and derivatives used to hedge
interest rate risk. Managements philosophy toward interest rate risk management is to limit the
variability of net interest income. The balances of financial instruments used in the projections
are based on expected growth from forecasted business opportunities, anticipated prepayments of
loans and investment securities, and expected maturities of investment securities, loans and
deposits. Management uses a value of equity model to supplement the modeling technique described
above. Those supplemental analyses are based on discounted cash flows associated with on- and
off-balance sheet financial instruments. Such analyses are modeled to reflect changes in interest
rates and provide management with a long-term interest rate risk metric.
The Companys Risk Management Committee, which includes members of senior management, monitors
the sensitivity of the Companys net interest income to changes in interest rates with the aid of a
computer model that forecasts net interest income under different interest rate scenarios. In
modeling changing interest rates, the Company considers different yield curve shapes that consider
both parallel (that is, simultaneous changes in interest rates at each point on the yield curve)
and non-parallel (that is, allowing interest rates at points on the yield curve to vary by
different amounts) shifts in the yield curve. In utilizing the model, market-implied forward
interest rates over the subsequent twelve months are generally used to determine a base interest
rate scenario for the net interest income simulation. That calculated base net interest income is
then compared to the
- 58 -
income calculated under the varying interest rate scenarios. The model considers the impact
of ongoing lending and deposit-gathering activities, as well as interrelationships in the magnitude
and timing of the repricing of financial instruments, including the effect of changing interest
rates on expected prepayments and maturities. When deemed prudent, management has taken actions to
mitigate exposure to interest rate risk through the use of on- or off-balance sheet financial
instruments and intends to do so in the future. Possible actions include, but are not limited to,
changes in the pricing of loan and deposit products, modifying the composition of earning assets
and interest-bearing liabilities, and adding to, modifying or terminating existing interest rate
swap agreements or other financial instruments used for interest rate risk management purposes.
The accompanying table as of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 displays the estimated
impact on net interest income from non-trading financial instruments in the base scenario described
above resulting from parallel changes in interest rates across repricing categories during the
first modeling year.
SENSITIVITY OF NET INTEREST INCOME
TO CHANGES IN INTEREST RATES
Dollars in thousands
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calculated increase (decrease) |
|
|
in projected net interest income |
Changes in interest rates |
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
December 31, 2008 |
+200 basis points |
|
$ |
46,327 |
|
|
|
33,516 |
|
+100 basis points |
|
|
22,549 |
|
|
|
9,726 |
|
-100 basis points |
|
|
(36,924 |
) |
|
|
(33,281 |
) |
-200 basis points |
|
|
(57,660 |
) |
|
|
(34,177 |
) |
The Company utilized many assumptions to calculate the impact that changes in interest rates
may have on net interest income. The more significant of those assumptions included the rate of
prepayments of mortgage-related assets, cash flows from derivative and other financial instruments
held for non-trading purposes, loan and deposit volumes and pricing, and deposit maturities. In
the scenarios presented, the Company also assumed gradual changes in interest rates during a
twelve-month period of 100 and 200 basis points, as compared with the assumed base scenario. In
the event that a 100 or 200 basis point rate change cannot be achieved, the applicable rate changes
are limited to lesser amounts such that interest rates cannot be less than zero. The assumptions
used in interest rate sensitivity modeling are inherently uncertain and, as a result, the Company
cannot precisely predict the impact of changes in interest rates on net interest income. Actual
results may differ significantly from those presented due to the timing, magnitude and frequency of
changes in interest rates and changes in market conditions and interest rate differentials
(spreads) between maturity/repricing categories, as well as any actions, such as those previously
described, which management may take to counter such changes. In light of the uncertainties and
assumptions associated with the process, the amounts presented in the table are not considered
significant to the Companys past or projected net interest income.
Changes in fair value of the Companys financial instruments can also result from a lack of
trading activity for similar instruments in the financial markets. That impact is most notable on
the values assigned to the Companys investment securities. Information about the fair valuation
of such securities is presented herein under the heading Capital and in notes 3 and 10 of Notes
to Financial Statements.
The Company engages in trading activities to meet the financial needs of customers, to fund
the Companys obligations under certain deferred compensation plans and, to a limited extent, to
profit from perceived market opportunities. Financial instruments utilized in trading activities
consist
- 59 -
predominantly of interest rate contracts, such as swap agreements, and forward and futures
contracts related to foreign currencies, but have also included forward and futures contracts
related to mortgage-backed securities and investments in U.S. Treasury and other government
securities, mortgage-backed securities and mutual funds and, as previously described, a limited
number of VRDBs. The Company generally mitigates the foreign currency and interest rate risk
associated with trading activities by entering into offsetting trading positions. The amounts of
gross and net trading positions, as well as the type of trading activities conducted by the
Company, are subject to a well-defined series of potential loss exposure limits established by
management and approved by M&Ts Board of Directors. However, as with any non-government
guaranteed financial instrument, the Company is exposed to credit risk associated with
counterparties to the Companys trading activities.
The notional amounts of interest rate contracts entered into for trading purposes totaled
$14.7 billion at September 30, 2009, compared with $14.2 billion at September 30, 2008 and $14.6
billion at December 31, 2008. The notional amounts of foreign currency and other option and
futures contracts entered into for trading purposes were $809 million, $820 million and $713
million at September 30, 2009, September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2008, respectively. Although
the notional amounts of these trading contracts are not recorded in the consolidated balance sheet,
the fair values of all financial instruments used for trading activities are recorded in the
consolidated balance sheet. The fair values of all trading account assets and liabilities were
$497 million and $385 million, respectively, at September 30, 2009, $370 million and $158 million,
respectively, at September 30, 2008, and $618 million and $521 million, respectively, at December
31, 2008. The rise in the fair value of both trading assets and trading liabilities at September
30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 as compared with September 30, 2008 was largely due to the impact of
lower interest rates on the fair values of interest rate swap agreements held in the trading
portfolio. Included in trading account assets at September 30, 2009 were $34 million of assets
related to deferred compensation plans, compared with $40 and $33 million at September 30 and
December 31, 2008, respectively. Changes in the fair value of such assets are recorded as trading
account and foreign exchange gains in the consolidated statement of income. Included in other
liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet at September 30, 2009 were $37 million of
liabilities related to deferred compensation plans, compared with $43 million and $38 million at
September 30 and December 31, 2008, respectively. Changes in the balances of such liabilities due
to the valuation of allocated investment options to which the liabilities are indexed are recorded
in other costs of operations in the consolidated statement of income.
Given the Companys policies, limits and positions, management believes that the potential
loss exposure to the Company resulting from market risk associated with trading activities was not
material, however, as previously noted, the Company is exposed to credit risk associated with
counterparties to transactions associated with the Companys trading activities. Additional
information about the Companys use of derivative financial instruments in its trading activities
is included in note 9 of Notes to Financial Statements.
Provision for Credit Losses
The Company maintains an allowance for credit losses that in managements judgment is adequate to
absorb losses inherent in the loan and lease portfolio. A provision for credit losses is recorded
to adjust the level of the allowance as deemed necessary by management. The provision for credit
losses in the third quarter of 2009 was $154 million, compared with $101
- 60 -
million in the year-earlier quarter and $147 million in the second quarter of 2009. For the
nine-month periods ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, the provision for credit losses was $459
million and $261 million, respectively. The higher levels of the provision in the 2009 periods as
compared with the 2008 periods reflect the deteriorating state of the U.S. economy, which since
late-2007 has been in recession, including a pronounced downturn in the residential real estate
market.
As already noted, loans acquired in connection with the Provident and Bradford transactions
were recorded at fair value with no carry over of any previously recorded allowance for credit
losses. Determining the fair value of the acquired loans required estimating cash flows expected
to be collected on the loans and discounting those cash flows at current interest rates. The
excess of cash flows expected at acquisition over the estimated fair value is recognized as
interest income over the remaining lives of the loans. The difference between contractually
required payments at acquisition and the cash flows expected to be collected at acquisition
reflects estimated future credit losses and other contractually required payments that the Company
does not expect to collect. Subsequent decreases to the expected cash flows will require the
Company to evaluate the need for an additional allowance for credit losses and could lead to
charge-offs of acquired loan balances. Subsequent increases in expected cash flows will result in
additional interest income to be recognized over the then-remaining lives of the loans.
Net loan charge-offs were $141 million in the recent quarter, compared with $94 million in the
third quarter of 2008 and $138 million in the second quarter of 2009. Net charge-offs as an
annualized percentage of average loans and leases were 1.07% in the third quarter of 2009, compared
with .77% and 1.09% in the third quarter of 2008 and the second quarter of 2009, respectively. Net
charge-offs for the nine-month periods ended September 30 totaled $379 million in 2009 and $239
million in 2008, representing 1.00% and .65% of average loans and leases. A summary of net
chargeoffs by loan type follows.
NET CHARGE-OFFS
BY LOAN/LEASE TYPE
In thousands
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year |
|
|
|
1st Qtr. |
|
|
2nd Qtr. |
|
|
3rd Qtr. |
|
|
to-date |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial, financial, etc. |
|
$ |
22,301 |
|
|
|
48,025 |
|
|
|
70,803 |
|
|
|
141,129 |
|
Real estate: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
22,399 |
|
|
|
27,511 |
|
|
|
20,645 |
|
|
|
70,555 |
|
Residential |
|
|
19,702 |
|
|
|
31,460 |
|
|
|
19,839 |
|
|
|
71,001 |
|
Consumer |
|
|
35,531 |
|
|
|
30,610 |
|
|
|
30,204 |
|
|
|
96,345 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
99,933 |
|
|
|
137,606 |
|
|
|
141,491 |
|
|
|
379,030 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year |
|
|
|
1st Qtr. |
|
|
2nd Qtr. |
|
|
3rd Qtr. |
|
|
to-date |
|
Commercial, financial, etc. |
|
$ |
4,377 |
|
|
|
20,284 |
|
|
|
8,312 |
|
|
|
32,973 |
|
Real estate: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
4,380 |
|
|
|
39,559 |
|
|
|
39,713 |
|
|
|
83,652 |
|
Residential |
|
|
15,097 |
|
|
|
12,490 |
|
|
|
16,081 |
|
|
|
43,668 |
|
Consumer |
|
|
21,961 |
|
|
|
26,888 |
|
|
|
30,089 |
|
|
|
78,938 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
45,815 |
|
|
|
99,221 |
|
|
|
94,195 |
|
|
|
239,231 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- 61 -
Net charge-offs of commercial loans and leases in the recent quarter reflect a $42 million
partial charge-off of a relationship with an operator of retirement communities and a $12 million
partial charge-off of an unsecured loan to a single customer in the commercial real estate sector.
During 2009s second quarter, a $33 million partial charge-off was taken on that latter
relationship. Included in net charge-offs of commercial real estate loans were net charge-offs of
loans to residential homebuilders and developers of $13 million and $33 million for the quarters
ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, and $17 million in the second quarter of 2009.
Net charge-offs of residential real estate loans included net charge-offs of Alt-A first mortgage
loans of $12 million in each of the third quarters of 2009 and 2008, compared with $14 million
during the quarter ended June 30, 2009. Also reflected in net charge-offs of residential real
estate loans were charge-offs of construction loans of $2 million in the recent quarter, compared
with $1 million in the year-earlier quarter and $12 million in 2009s second quarter. The higher
amount in 2009s second quarter reflected updated property appraisals and the delinquency status of
the loans. Included in net charge-offs of consumer loans and leases were net charge-offs during
the quarters ended September 30, 2009, September 30, 2008 and June 30, 2009, respectively, of:
indirect automobile loans of $11 million, $13 million and $14 million; recreational vehicle loans
of $5 million, $6 million and $6 million; and home equity loans and lines of credit, including
Alt-A second lien loans, of $11 million, $7 million and $9 million. Including both first and
second lien mortgages, net charge-offs of Alt-A loans totaled $14 million for the quarter ended
September 30, 2009, compared with $15 million and $16 million in the third quarter of 2008 and the
second 2009 quarter, respectively.
Nonaccrual loans totaled $1.23 billion or 2.35% of total loans and leases outstanding at
September 30, 2009, compared with $688 million or 1.41% at September 30, 2008, $755 million or
1.54% at December 31, 2008, and $1.11 billion or 2.11% at June 30, 2009. Major factors
contributing to the rise in nonaccrual loans from the third quarter of 2008 were a $239 million
increase in commercial loans and leases, a $228 million increase in commercial real estate loans,
including a $142 million rise in loans to builders and developers of residential real estate, and a
$46 million rise in residential real estate loans. The rise in nonaccrual loans from December 31,
2008 to September 30, 2009 was predominantly due to a $219 million increase in commercial loans and
leases, including $64 million to a single borrower that operates retirement communities, and a $200
million increase in commercial real estate loans, including a $113 million rise in loans to
residential real estate builders and developers. The recessionary state of the U.S. economy has
resulted in generally higher levels of nonaccrual loans. In particular, turbulence in the
residential real estate market place has resulted in deteriorating real estate values and increased
delinquencies, both for loans to builders and developers of residential real estate and to
consumers.
Accruing loans past due 90 days or more were $183 million or .35% of total loans and leases at
September 30, 2009, compared with $96 million or .20% a year earlier, $159 million or .32% at
December 31, 2008 and $155 million or .29% at June 30, 2009. Those loans included $173 million,
$90 million, $114 million and $144 million at September 30, 2009, September 30, 2008, December 31,
2008 and June 30, 2009, respectively, of loans guaranteed by government-related entities. Such
guaranteed loans included one-to-four family residential mortgage loans serviced by the Company
that were repurchased to reduce servicing costs, including a requirement to advance principal and
interest payments that had not been received from individual mortgagors. Despite the loans being
purchased by the Company, the insurance or guarantee by the applicable government-related entity
remains in force. The outstanding principal balances of the repurchased loans are fully guaranteed
by government-related entities and totaled $156 million, $86 million, $108 million and $138 million
at September 30, 2009, September 30,
- 62 -
2008, December 31, 2008 and June 30, 2009, respectively. Loans past due 90 days or more and
accruing interest that were guaranteed by government-related entities also included foreign
commercial and industrial loans supported by the Export-Import Bank of the United States that
totaled $13 million at September 30, 2009, compared with $3 million at each of September 30, 2008
and June 30, 2009 and $5 million at December 31, 2008.
Loans obtained in the 2009 acquisition transactions that were impaired at the date of
acquisition were recorded at estimated fair value and are generally delinquent in payments, but, in
accordance with GAAP the Company continues to accrue interest income on such loans based on the
estimated expected cash flows associated with the loans. The carrying amount of such loans was
$108 million at September 30, 2009, or approximately .2% of total loans.
In an effort to assist borrowers, the Company modified the terms of select loans secured by
residential real estate. The modified loans were largely from the Companys portfolio of Alt-A
loans and aggregated $276 million at September 30, 2009. Approximately $167 million of modified
residential real estate loans have demonstrated payment capability consistent with the modified
terms and, accordingly, were classified as renegotiated loans and were accruing interest at
September 30, 2009. The remaining $109 million of modified loans were included in nonaccrual loans
at September 30, 2009. Loan modifications included such actions as the extension of loan maturity
dates (generally from thirty to forty years) and the lowering of interest rates and monthly
payments. The objective of the modifications was to increase loan repayments by customers and
thereby reduce net charge-offs. In accordance with GAAP, the modified loans are included in
impaired loans for purposes of determining the allowance for credit losses. Modified residential
real estate loans totaled $162 million as of December 31, 2008, of which $93 million were in
nonaccrual status and $69 million were classified as renegotiated loans and were accruing interest
at that date.
Commercial loans and leases classified as nonaccrual aggregated $333 million at September 30,
2009, $94 million at September 30, 2008, $114 million at December 31, 2008, and $294 million at
June 30, 2009. The rise in such loans during 2009 reflects a relationship to a single borrower
that operates retirement communities ($64 million), a $38 million loan to a consumer finance and
credit insurance company (added during the recent quarter), a loan to a single borrower in the
commercial real estate sector ($36 million) and a $25 million loan to a business in the health care
sector (added in the recent quarter).
Nonaccrual commercial real estate loans totaled $519 million at September 30, 2009, $291
million a year earlier, $319 million at December 31, 2008 and $448 million at June 30, 2009. The
rise in such loans at September 30, 2009 as compared with September 30 and December 31, 2008
reflects the addition of $142 million and $113 million, respectively, of loans to residential
homebuilders and developers, reflecting the impact of the downturn in the residential real estate
market, including declining real estate values. The increase from June 30, 2009 to September 30,
2009 was due, in part, to the net addition of $37 million of loans to residential homebuilders and
developers. Information about the location of nonaccrual and chargedoff loans to residential real
estate builders and developers as of and for the three-month period ended September 30, 2009 is
presented in the accompanying table.
- 63 -
RESIDENTIAL BUILDER AND DEVELOPER LOANS, NET OF UNEARNED DISCOUNT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter ended |
|
|
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonaccrual |
|
|
Net charge-offs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annualized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
percent of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
average |
|
|
|
Outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
outstanding |
|
|
|
balances |
|
|
Balances |
|
|
balances |
|
|
Balances |
|
|
balances |
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
New York |
|
$ |
457,342 |
|
|
$ |
4,965 |
|
|
|
1.09 |
% |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
% |
Pennsylvania |
|
|
264,097 |
|
|
|
38,558 |
|
|
|
14.60 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mid-Atlantic |
|
|
1,024,878 |
|
|
|
199,816 |
|
|
|
19.50 |
|
|
|
10,049 |
|
|
|
3.96 |
|
Other |
|
|
278,806 |
|
|
|
78,835 |
|
|
|
28.28 |
|
|
|
2,719 |
|
|
|
3.84 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
2,025,123 |
|
|
$ |
322,174 |
|
|
|
15.91 |
% |
|
$ |
12,768 |
|
|
|
2.47 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential real estate loans classified as nonaccrual totaled $288 million at September 30,
2009, $242 million at September 30, 2008, $256 million at December 31, 2008 and $283 million at
June 30, 2009. Declining property values and higher levels of delinquencies have contributed to
the rise in residential real estate loans classified as nonaccrual and to the level of charge-offs.
Included in residential real estate loans classified as
nonaccrual were Alt-A loans, which totaled $125 million, $130 million, $125 million and $124
million at September 30, 2009, September 30, 2008, December 31, 2008 and June 30, 2009,
respectively. Residential real estate loans past due 90 days or more and accruing interest totaled
$156 million at September 30, 2009, compared with $86 million a year-earlier, and $108 million and
$138 million at December 31, 2008 and June 30, 2009, respectively. A substantial portion of such
amounts related to guaranteed loans repurchased from government-related entities. Information
about the location of nonaccrual and charged-off residential real estate loans as of and for the
quarter ended September 30, 2009 is presented in the accompanying table.
Nonaccruing consumer loans and leases totaled $88 million at September 30, 2009, compared with
$61 million a year earlier, $66 million at December 31, 2008 and $86 million at June 30, 2009.
Included in nonaccrual consumer loans and leases at September 30, 2009, September 30, 2008,
December 31, 2008 and June 30, 2009 were indirect automobile loans of $36 million, $21 million, $21
million and $28 million, respectively; recreational vehicle loans of $16 million, $9 million, $14
million and $14 million, respectively; and outstanding balances of home equity loans and lines of
credit, including second lien Alt-A loans, of $33 million, $27 million, $29 million and $38
million, respectively. Information about the location of nonaccrual and charged-off home equity
loans and lines of credit as of and for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 is presented in the
accompanying table.
- 64 -
SELECTED RESIDENTIAL REAL ESTATE-RELATED LOAN DATA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter ended |
|
|
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonaccrual |
|
|
Net charge-offs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annualized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
percent of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
average |
|
|
|
Outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
outstanding |
|
|
|
balances |
|
|
Balances |
|
|
balances |
|
|
Balances |
|
|
balances |
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
Residential mortgages: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New York |
|
$ |
1,784,366 |
|
|
$ |
35,867 |
|
|
|
2.01 |
% |
|
$ |
437 |
|
|
|
0.10 |
% |
Pennsylvania |
|
|
604,511 |
|
|
|
13,319 |
|
|
|
2.20 |
|
|
|
426 |
|
|
|
0.28 |
|
Mid-Atlantic |
|
|
1,068,670 |
|
|
|
37,922 |
|
|
|
3.55 |
|
|
|
1,581 |
|
|
|
0.66 |
|
Other |
|
|
1,065,049 |
|
|
|
55,697 |
|
|
|
5.23 |
|
|
|
3,609 |
|
|
|
1.27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
4,522,596 |
|
|
$ |
142,805 |
|
|
|
3.16 |
% |
|
$ |
6,053 |
|
|
|
0.53 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential construction loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New York |
|
$ |
23,520 |
|
|
$ |
1,180 |
|
|
|
5.02 |
% |
|
$ |
90 |
|
|
|
1.30 |
% |
Pennsylvania |
|
|
9,204 |
|
|
|
1,533 |
|
|
|
16.66 |
|
|
|
417 |
|
|
|
14.59 |
|
Mid-Atlantic |
|
|
7,574 |
|
|
|
2,765 |
|
|
|
36.51 |
|
|
|
95 |
|
|
|
4.19 |
|
Other |
|
|
67,666 |
|
|
|
15,205 |
|
|
|
22.47 |
|
|
|
1,647 |
|
|
|
8.58 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
107,964 |
|
|
$ |
20,683 |
|
|
|
19.16 |
% |
|
$ |
2,249 |
|
|
|
7.20 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alt-A first mortgages: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New York |
|
$ |
112,121 |
|
|
$ |
16,032 |
|
|
|
14.30 |
% |
|
$ |
825 |
|
|
|
2.87 |
% |
Pennsylvania |
|
|
31,298 |
|
|
|
2,075 |
|
|
|
6.63 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
1.25 |
|
Mid-Atlantic |
|
|
144,288 |
|
|
|
18,020 |
|
|
|
12.49 |
|
|
|
1,722 |
|
|
|
4.66 |
|
Other |
|
|
508,993 |
|
|
|
88,411 |
|
|
|
17.37 |
|
|
|
8,890 |
|
|
|
6.75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
796,700 |
|
|
$ |
124,538 |
|
|
|
15.63 |
% |
|
$ |
11,537 |
|
|
|
5.62 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alt-A junior lien: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New York |
|
$ |
3,833 |
|
|
$ |
347 |
|
|
|
9.06 |
% |
|
$ |
224 |
|
|
|
22.56 |
% |
Pennsylvania |
|
|
1,192 |
|
|
|
67 |
|
|
|
5.59 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
0.20 |
|
Mid-Atlantic |
|
|
5,623 |
|
|
|
399 |
|
|
|
7.10 |
|
|
|
241 |
|
|
|
16.68 |
|
Other |
|
|
21,832 |
|
|
|
2,330 |
|
|
|
10.67 |
|
|
|
1,560 |
|
|
|
27.39 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
32,480 |
|
|
$ |
3,143 |
|
|
|
9.68 |
% |
|
$ |
2,026 |
|
|
|
24.01 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First lien home equity loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New York |
|
$ |
48,613 |
|
|
$ |
163 |
|
|
|
0.34 |
% |
|
$ |
11 |
|
|
|
0.09 |
% |
Pennsylvania |
|
|
272,699 |
|
|
|
1,899 |
|
|
|
0.70 |
|
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
0.12 |
|
Mid-Atlantic |
|
|
196,142 |
|
|
|
713 |
|
|
|
0.36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
2,392 |
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
2.04 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
519,846 |
|
|
$ |
2,824 |
|
|
|
0.54 |
% |
|
$ |
96 |
|
|
|
0.07 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First lien home equity lines: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New York |
|
$ |
692,501 |
|
|
$ |
910 |
|
|
|
0.13 |
% |
|
$ |
120 |
|
|
|
0.07 |
% |
Pennsylvania |
|
|
474,443 |
|
|
|
874 |
|
|
|
0.18 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
Mid-Atlantic |
|
|
492,449 |
|
|
|
458 |
|
|
|
0.09 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
12,968 |
|
|
|
183 |
|
|
|
1.41 |
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
1.82 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,672,361 |
|
|
$ |
2,425 |
|
|
|
0.15 |
% |
|
$ |
184 |
|
|
|
0.04 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Junior lien home equity loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New York |
|
$ |
126,834 |
|
|
$ |
974 |
|
|
|
0.77 |
% |
|
$ |
315 |
|
|
|
0.95 |
% |
Pennsylvania |
|
|
135,895 |
|
|
|
1,435 |
|
|
|
1.06 |
|
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
0.24 |
|
Mid-Atlantic |
|
|
218,224 |
|
|
|
905 |
|
|
|
0.41 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
0.07 |
|
Other |
|
|
9,602 |
|
|
|
478 |
|
|
|
4.98 |
|
|
|
234 |
|
|
|
9.41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
490,555 |
|
|
$ |
3,792 |
|
|
|
0.77 |
% |
|
$ |
674 |
|
|
|
0.54 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Junior lien home equity lines: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New York |
|
$ |
1,861,963 |
|
|
$ |
11,830 |
|
|
|
0.64 |
% |
|
$ |
4,143 |
|
|
|
0.88 |
% |
Pennsylvania |
|
|
619,172 |
|
|
|
2,337 |
|
|
|
0.38 |
|
|
|
1,085 |
|
|
|
0.70 |
|
Mid-Atlantic |
|
|
1,590,930 |
|
|
|
5,133 |
|
|
|
0.32 |
|
|
|
3,171 |
|
|
|
0.80 |
|
Other |
|
|
81,096 |
|
|
|
1,131 |
|
|
|
1.39 |
|
|
|
356 |
|
|
|
1.73 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
4,153,161 |
|
|
$ |
20,431 |
|
|
|
0.49 |
% |
|
$ |
8,755 |
|
|
|
0.84 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- 65 -
Real estate and other foreclosed assets totaled $85 million at each of September 30, 2009
and 2008, $100 million at December 31, 2008 and $90 million at June 30, 2009. At September 30,
2009 the Companys holding of residential real estate-related properties comprised 80% of
foreclosed assets.
A comparative summary of nonperforming assets and certain past due, renegotiated and impaired
loan data and credit quality ratios as of the end of the periods indicated is presented in the
accompanying table.
NONPERFORMING ASSET AND PAST DUE, RENEGOTIATED AND IMPAIRED LOAN DATA
Dollars in thousands
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 Quarters |
|
|
2008 Quarters |
|
|
|
Third |
|
|
Second |
|
|
First |
|
|
Fourth |
|
|
Third |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonaccrual loans |
|
$ |
1,228,341 |
|
|
|
1,111,423 |
|
|
|
1,003,987 |
|
|
|
755,397 |
|
|
|
688,214 |
|
Real estate and other
foreclosed assets |
|
|
84,676 |
|
|
|
90,461 |
|
|
|
100,270 |
|
|
|
99,617 |
|
|
|
85,305 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total nonperforming assets |
|
$ |
1,313,017 |
|
|
|
1,201,884 |
|
|
|
1,104,257 |
|
|
|
855,014 |
|
|
|
773,519 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accruing loans past due
90 days or more(a) |
|
$ |
182,750 |
|
|
|
155,125 |
|
|
|
142,842 |
|
|
|
158,991 |
|
|
|
96,206 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Renegotiated loans |
|
$ |
190,917 |
|
|
|
170,950 |
|
|
|
130,932 |
|
|
|
91,575 |
|
|
|
21,804 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchased impaired loans(b): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding customer
balance |
|
$ |
209,138 |
|
|
|
170,400 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying amount |
|
|
108,058 |
|
|
|
97,730 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Government guaranteed loans
included in totals above: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonaccrual loans |
|
$ |
38,590 |
|
|
|
38,075 |
|
|
|
38,460 |
|
|
|
32,506 |
|
|
|
30,075 |
|
Accruing loans past
due 90 days or more |
|
|
172,701 |
|
|
|
143,886 |
|
|
|
127,237 |
|
|
|
114,183 |
|
|
|
89,945 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonaccrual loans
to total loans and leases,
net of unearned discount |
|
|
2.35 |
% |
|
|
2.11 |
% |
|
|
2.05 |
% |
|
|
1.54 |
% |
|
|
1.41 |
% |
Nonperforming assets
to total net loans and
leases and real estate and
other foreclosed assets |
|
|
2.51 |
% |
|
|
2.28 |
% |
|
|
2.25 |
% |
|
|
1.74 |
% |
|
|
1.59 |
% |
Accruing loans past due
90 days or more to total
loans and leases, net of
unearned discount |
|
|
.35 |
% |
|
|
.29 |
% |
|
|
.29 |
% |
|
|
.32 |
% |
|
|
.20 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Predominately residential mortgage loans. |
|
(b) |
|
Accruing loans that were impaired at acquisition date and recorded at fair
value. |
Management regularly assesses the adequacy of the allowance for credit losses by performing
ongoing evaluations of the loan and lease portfolio, including such factors as the differing
economic risks associated with each loan category, the financial condition of specific borrowers,
the economic environment in which borrowers operate, the level of delinquent loans, the value of
any collateral and, where applicable, the existence of any guarantees or indemnifications.
Management evaluated the impact of changes in interest rates and overall economic conditions on the
ability of borrowers
to meet repayment obligations when quantifying the Companys exposure to
- 66 -
credit losses and assessing the adequacy of the Companys allowance for such losses as of each
reporting date. Factors also considered by management when performing its assessment, in addition
to general economic conditions and the other factors described above, included, but were not
limited to: (i) the impact of declining residential real estate values in the Companys portfolio
of loans to residential real estate builders and developers; (ii) the repayment performance
associated with the Companys portfolio of Alt-A residential mortgage loans; (iii) the
concentration of commercial real estate loans in the Companys loan portfolio, particularly the
large concentration of loans secured by properties in New York State, in general, and in the New
York City metropolitan area, in particular; (iv) the amount of commercial and industrial loans to
businesses in areas of New York State outside of the New York City metropolitan area and in central
Pennsylvania that have historically experienced less economic growth and vitality than the vast
majority of other regions of the country; and (v) the size of the Companys portfolio of loans to
individual consumers, which historically have experienced higher net charge-offs as a percentage of
loans outstanding than other loan types. The level of the allowance is adjusted based on the
results of managements analysis.
Management cautiously and conservatively evaluated the allowance for credit losses as of
September 30, 2009 in light of (i) lower residential real estate values and higher levels of
delinquencies of residential real estate loans; (ii) the declining pace of economic growth in many
of the markets served by the Company; (iii) continuing weakness in industrial employment in upstate
New York and central Pennsylvania; (iv) the significant subjectivity involved in commercial real
estate valuations for properties located in areas with stagnant or low growth economies; and (v)
the amount of loan growth experienced by the Company. Considerable concerns exist about the
economic downturn in both national and international markets; the level and volatility of energy
prices; a weakened housing market; the troubled state of financial and credit markets; Federal
Reserve positioning of monetary policy; rising private sector layoffs and unemployment, which has
caused consumer spending to slow; the underlying impact on businesses operations and abilities to
repay loans as consumer spending slowed; continued stagnant population growth in the upstate New
York and central Pennsylvania regions; and reduced domestic automobile sales. The U.S. economy has
been in recession since late-2007, however, as compared with other areas of the country, the impact
of deteriorating national market conditions was not as pronounced on borrowers in the traditionally
slower growth or stagnant regions of upstate New York and central Pennsylvania. Approximately
two-thirds of the Companys loans are to customers in New York State and Pennsylvania, including a
large portion to customers in upstate New York and central Pennsylvania. Home prices in upstate
New York and central Pennsylvania increased in 2008, in sharp contrast to steep declines in values
in other regions of the country. Therefore, despite the conditions, as previously described, the
most severe credit issues experienced by the Company have been centered around residential real
estate, including loans to builders and developers of residential real estate in areas other than
New York State and Pennsylvania. In response, throughout 2008 and 2009 the Company has conducted
detailed reviews of all loans to residential real estate builders and developers that exceeded
$2.5 million. Those credit reviews often resulted in adjustments to loan grades and, if
appropriate, commencement of intensified collection efforts, including foreclosure.
During the first three quarters of 2009, the Company has also experienced
increases in nonaccrual commercial loans, largely the result of a small number of large
relationships. The Company
utilizes an extensive loan grading system which is applied to all commercial and commercial real
estate loans. On a quarterly basis, the Companys loan review department reviews all commercial
and commercial real estate loans greater than $350,000 that are classified as Special Mention or
worse. Meetings are held with loan officers and their managers, workout specialists and Senior
Management to discuss each of the relationships. Borrower-specific information is reviewed,
including operating results, future cash
- 67 -
flows, recent developments and the borrowers outlook, and
other pertinent data. The timing and extent of potential losses, considering collateral valuation,
and the Companys potential courses of action are reviewed. To the extent that these loans are
collateral-dependent, they are evaluated based on the fair value of the loans collateral as
estimated at or near the financial statement date. As the quality of a loan deteriorates to the
point of classifying the loan as Special Mention, the process of obtaining updated collateral
valuation information is usually initiated, unless it is not considered warranted given factors
such as the relative size of the loan, the characteristics of the collateral or the age of the
last valuation. In those latter cases, when current appraisals may not yet be available, prior
appraisals are utilized with adjustments, as deemed necessary, for estimates of subsequent declines
in value as determined by line of business and/or loan workout personnel in the respective
geographic regions. Those adjustments are reviewed and assessed for reasonableness by the
Companys loan review department. Accordingly, for real estate collateral securing larger
commercial and commercial real estate loans, estimated collateral values are based on current
appraisals and estimates of value. For non-real estate loans, collateral is assigned a discounted
estimated liquidation value and, depending on the nature of the collateral, is verified through
field exams or other procedures. In assessing collateral, real estate and non-real estate values
are reduced by an estimate of selling costs. With regard to residential real estate loans, with
special emphasis on the portfolio of Alt-A mortgage loans, the Company expanded its collections and
loan work-out staff and further refined its loss identification and estimation techniques by
reference to loan performance and house price depreciation data in specific areas of the country
where collateral that was securing the Companys residential real estate loans was located. For
residential real estate loans, including home equity loans and lines of credit, the excess of the
loan balance over the net realizable value of the property collateralizing the loan is charged-off
when the loan becomes 150 days delinquent. That charge-off is based on recent indications of value
from external parties.
Factors that influence the Companys credit loss experience include overall economic
conditions affecting businesses and consumers generally, such as those described above, but also
residential and commercial real estate valuations, in particular, given the size of the real estate
loan portfolios. Reflecting the factors and conditions as described herein, through September 30,
2009 the more significant increases in nonaccrual loans and net charge-offs of real estate-related
loans have been in the Companys portfolios of residential real estate loans, including second lien
Alt-A mortgage loans, and loans to builders and developers of residential real estate. Commercial
real estate valuations can be highly subjective, as they are based upon many assumptions. Such
valuations can be significantly affected over relatively short periods of time by changes in
business climate, economic conditions, interest rates and, in many cases, the results of operations
of businesses and other occupants of the real property. Similarly, residential real estate
valuations can be impacted by housing trends, the availability of financing at reasonable interest
rates, and general economic conditions affecting consumers.
Management believes that the allowance for credit losses at September 30, 2009 was adequate to
absorb credit losses inherent in the portfolio as of that date. The allowance for credit losses
was $868 million, or 1.66% of total loans and leases at September 30, 2009, compared with $781
million or 1.60% at September 30, 2008, $788 million or 1.61% at December 31, 2008 and $855 million
or 1.62% at June 30, 2009. The ratio of the allowance to total loans at September 30, 2009
reflects the addition of $4.0 billion of loans obtained in the acquisition of Provident and $302
million of loans obtained in the Bradford transaction that have been recorded at estimated fair
value that is based on estimated future cash flows expected to be received on those loans. As a
result, and as required by GAAP, there was no carry over of the
- 68 -
allowances for credit losses previously recorded by Provident and Bradford. The allowance for
credit losses at September 30, 2009 as a percentage of the Companys legacy loans (that is, total
loans excluding loans acquired during 2009 in the Provident and Bradford transactions) was 1.81%,
compared with 1.76% at June 30, 2009. The level of the allowance reflects managements evaluation
of the loan and lease portfolio as described herein. Should the various credit factors considered
by management in establishing the allowance for credit losses change and should managements
assessment of losses inherent in the loan portfolio also change, the level of the allowance as a
percentage of loans could increase or decrease in future periods. The ratio of the allowance for
credit losses to nonaccrual loans was 71% at September 30, 2009, compared with 113% a year earlier,
104% at December 31, 2008 and 77% at June 30, 2009. Given the Companys general position as a
secured lender and its practice of charging off loan balances when collection is deemed doubtful,
that ratio and changes in that ratio are generally not an indicative measure of the adequacy of the
Companys allowance for credit losses, nor does management rely upon that ratio in assessing the
adequacy of the allowance. The level of the allowance reflects managements evaluation of the loan
and lease portfolio as of each respective date.
A comparative allocation of the allowance for credit losses to specific legacy loan categories follows.
ALLOCATION OF THE ALLOWANCE FOR CREDIT LOSSES TO LOAN CATEGORIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
Commercial, financial,
agricultural, etc. |
|
$ |
233,392 |
|
|
|
226,977 |
|
|
|
231,993 |
|
Real estate |
|
|
446,211 |
|
|
|
310,135 |
|
|
|
340,588 |
|
Consumer |
|
|
138,418 |
|
|
|
159,828 |
|
|
|
140,571 |
|
Unallocated |
|
|
49,853 |
|
|
|
83,743 |
|
|
|
74,752 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
867,874 |
|
|
|
780,683 |
|
|
|
787,904 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a percentage of legacy
loans and leases outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial, financial,
agricultural, etc. |
|
|
1.80 |
% |
|
|
1.60 |
% |
|
|
1.63 |
% |
Real estate |
|
|
1.84 |
|
|
|
1.32 |
|
|
|
1.43 |
|
Consumer |
|
|
1.28 |
|
|
|
1.44 |
|
|
|
1.28 |
|
Total |
|
|
1.81 |
|
|
|
1.60 |
|
|
|
1.61 |
|
Other Income
Other income totaled $278 million in the third quarter of 2009, compared with $114 million in the
corresponding quarter of 2008 and $272 million in the second quarter of 2009. Reflected in such
income were net losses on investment securities (including other-than-temporary impairment losses),
which totaled to $47 million in the recent quarter, $152 million in the third quarter of 2008 and
$24 million in 2009s second quarter. During the recent quarter, other-than-temporary impairment
charges of $47 million were recognized related to certain of the Companys privately issued CMOs
and CDOs. In the third quarter of 2008, other-than-temporary impairment losses of $153 million
were recorded on the Companys holdings of preferred stock of
- 69 -
Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.
Other-than-temporary impairment charges totaling $25 million were recognized in 2009s second
quarter related to certain of the Companys privately issued CMOs and CDOs. Excluding gains and
losses on bank investment securities (including other-than-temporary impairment losses), other
income in the recent quarter totaled $325 million, up 22% from $266 million in the year-earlier
quarter and up 10% from $296 million in the second quarter of 2009. The most significant factor
for the rise in such income from the third quarter of 2008 was the $29 million gain recognized on
the Bradford acquisition transaction. Also contributing to the improvement from the year-earlier
quarter were higher mortgage banking revenues and service charges on deposit accounts obtained in
the 2009 acquisition transactions. As compared with 2009s second quarter, the gain on the
Bradford transaction and higher service charges on deposit accounts (predominately related to the
2009 acquisitions) were partially offset by a decline in mortgage banking revenues and a higher loss
associated with M&Ts pro-rata share of the operating results of Bayview Lending Group LLC (BLG).
Mortgage banking revenues aggregated $48 million in the recent quarter, 27% higher than $38
million in the third quarter of 2008, but 9% below $53 million in the second quarter of 2009.
Mortgage banking revenues are comprised of both residential and commercial mortgage banking
activities. The Companys involvement in commercial mortgage banking activities includes the
origination, sales and servicing of loans under the multi-family loan programs of Fannie Mae,
Freddie Mac and the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.
Residential mortgage banking revenues, consisting of realized gains from sales of residential
mortgage loans and loan servicing rights, unrealized gains and losses on residential mortgage loans
held for sale and related commitments, residential mortgage loan servicing fees, and other
residential mortgage loan-related fees and income, were $38 million in the recent quarter,
compared with $28 million in the third quarter of 2008 and $42 million in the second quarter of
2009. The substantially higher revenues in the two most recent quarters as compared with the third
quarter of 2008 were attributable to significantly higher origination activity, due largely to
refinancing of loans by consumers in response to relatively low interest rates, and wider margins
associated with that activity.
Residential mortgage loans originated for sale to other investors were approximately $1.4
billion in the recent quarter, compared with $960 million in the third quarter of 2008 and $1.8
billion in 2009s second quarter. Residential mortgage loans sold to investors totaled $1.6
billion in the third quarter of 2009, compared with $1.1 billion in the year-earlier quarter and
$1.9 billion in the second quarter of 2009. Realized gains from sales of residential mortgage
loans and loan servicing rights and recognized net unrealized gains and losses attributable to
residential mortgage loans held for sale, commitments to originate loans for sale and commitments
to sell loans totaled to a gain of $17 million in the recently completed quarter, compared with
gains of $6 million and $20 million in the third quarter of 2008 and the second quarter of 2009,
respectively. Revenues from servicing residential mortgage loans for others were $20 million in
the recent quarter, compared with $21 million in each of the third quarter of 2008 and the second
quarter of 2009. Included in such servicing revenues were amounts related to purchased servicing
rights associated with small balance commercial mortgage loans which totaled $7 million in the
recent quarter and $8 million in each of the third quarter of 2008 and in 2009s second quarter.
Residential mortgage loans serviced for others were $21.3 billion at each of September 30,
2009 and December 31, 2008, compared with $21.2 billion at September 30, 2008, including the small
balance commercial mortgage loans noted above of approximately $5.7 billion at the recent
quarter-end, compared with $5.8 billion at September 30, 2008 and $5.9 billion at December 31,
2008. Capitalized residential mortgage servicing assets, net of a valuation
- 70 -
allowance for
impairment, were $144 million at September 30, 2009, compared with $171 million at September 30,
2008 and $143 million at December 31, 2008. Included in capitalized residential mortgage servicing
assets were $44 million at September 30, 2009, $63 million at September 30, 2008 and $58 million at
December 31, 2008 of purchased servicing rights associated with the small balance commercial
mortgage loans noted above. Servicing rights for the small balance commercial mortgage loans were
purchased from BLG or its affiliates. In addition, at September 30, 2009 capitalized servicing
rights included $20 million for servicing rights for $4.1 billion of residential real estate loans
that were purchased from affiliates of BLG. Additional information about the Companys
relationship with BLG and its affiliates is provided in note 13 of Notes to Financial Statements.
Loans held for sale that are secured by residential real estate totaled $462 million and $439
million at September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, and $352 million at December 31, 2008.
Commitments to sell loans and commitments to originate loans for sale at pre-determined rates were
$911 million and $795 million, respectively, at September 30, 2009, $736 million and $657 million,
respectively, at September 30, 2008 and $898 million and $871 million, respectively, at December
31, 2008. Net unrealized gains on residential mortgage loans held for sale, commitments to sell
loans, and commitments to originate loans for sale were $13 million and $6 million at September
30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively, compared with net unrealized losses of $5 million at
September 30, 2008. Changes in such net unrealized gains and losses are recorded in mortgage
banking revenues and resulted in net decreases in revenues of $9 million and $300 thousand in the
third quarters of 2009 and 2008, respectively, compared with a net decrease of $1 million in the
second quarter of 2009.
Commercial mortgage banking revenues were $10 million in each of the third quarters of 2009
and 2008, compared with $11 million in 2009s second quarter. Included in such amounts were
revenues from loan origination and sales activities of $6 million in the third quarter of 2009,
compared with $7 million in the corresponding 2008 period and $8 million in the second quarter of
2009. Commercial mortgage loan servicing revenues were $4 million in the recent quarter, compared
with $3 million in each of the third quarter of 2008 and the second quarter of 2009. Capitalized
commercial mortgage servicing assets totaled $31 million at September 30, 2009, $25 million at
September 30, 2008 and $26 million at December 31, 2008. Commercial mortgage loans serviced for
other investors totaled $7.0 billion, $6.2 billion and $6.4 billion at September 30, 2009,
September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2008, respectively, and included $1.3 billion, $1.1 billion and
$1.2 billion, respectively, of loan balances for which investors had recourse to the Company if
such balances are ultimately uncollectable. Commitments to sell commercial mortgage loans and
commitments to originate commercial mortgage loans for sale were $160 million and $41 million,
respectively, at September 30, 2009, $150 million and $79 million, respectively, at September 30,
2008 and $408 million and $252 million, respectively, at December 31, 2008. Commercial mortgage
loans held for sale at September 30, 2009 and 2008 were $119 million and $71 million, respectively,
and were $156 million at December 31, 2008.
Service charges on deposit accounts totaled $129 million in the recent quarter, up from $110
million and $112 million in the third quarter of 2008 and the second 2009 quarter, respectively.
The rise in such fees in the recent quarter as compared with the earlier quarters was due
predominantly to the impact of the acquisition of Provident. Trust income totaled $32 million in
the two most recent quarters, compared with $39 million in last years third quarter. The declines
in trust income in the two most recent quarters as compared with the third quarter of 2008 were
largely attributable to lower fees for providing services that are based on market values of assets
under administration. Brokerage services income, which includes revenues from the sale of mutual
funds and annuities and securities brokerage fees, totaled $14 million in the third quarter of
2009, compared with $16 million in the
- 71 -
similar quarter of 2008 and $13 million in the second
quarter of 2009. Trading account and foreign exchange activity resulted in gains of $7 million
during the most recent quarter, compared with gains of $4 million in the year-earlier quarter and
$8 million in the second quarter of 2009.
Including other-than-temporary impairment losses, during the third quarter of 2009 the Company
recognized losses on investment securities of $47 million, compared with losses of $152 million in
the year-earlier quarter and losses of $24 million in the second quarter of 2009.
Other-than-temporary impairment charges of $47 million, $153 million and $25 million were recorded
in the quarters ended September 30, 2009, September 30, 2008 and June 30, 2009, respectively. Each
reporting period, the Company reviews its investment securities for other-than-temporary
impairment. For equity securities, such as the Companys investment in the preferred stock of
Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the Company considers various factors to determine if the decline in
value is other than temporary, including the duration and extent of the decline in value, the
factors contributing to the decline in fair value, including the financial condition of the issuer
as well as the conditions of the industry in which it operates, and the prospects for a recovery in
fair value of the equity security. For debt securities, the Company analyzes the creditworthiness
of the issuer or reviews the credit performance of the underlying collateral supporting the bond.
For debt securities backed by pools of loans, such as privately issued mortgage-backed securities,
the Company estimates the cash flows of the underlying loan collateral using forward-looking
assumptions of default rates, loss severities and prepayment speeds. Estimated collateral cash
flows are then utilized to estimate bond-specific cash flows to determine the ultimate
collectibility of the bond. If the present value of the cash flows indicates that the Company
should not expect to recover the entire amortized cost basis
of a bond or if the Company intends to sell the bond or it more likely than not will be
required to sell the bond before recovery of its amortized cost basis, an other-than-temporary
impairment loss is recognized. If an other-than-temporary impairment loss is deemed to have
occurred, the investment securitys cost basis is adjusted, as appropriate for the circumstances,
by the amount of loss being recognized in the consolidated statement of income.
M&Ts pro-rata share of the operating results of BLG in the recent quarter was a loss of $11
million, compared with losses of $14 million in the third quarter of 2008 and $207 thousand in the
second 2009 quarter. The operating losses of BLG in the respective quarters resulted from the
disruptions in the commercial mortgage-backed securities market and reflected losses from loan
securitization and sales activities, lower values ascribed to loans held for sale, and costs
associated with severance and certain lease terminations incurred by BLG as it downsized its
operations. Despite the credit and liquidity disruptions that began in 2007, BLG had been
successfully securitizing and selling significant volumes of small-balance commercial real estate
loans until the first quarter of 2008. In response to the illiquidity in the marketplace since
that time, BLG reduced its originations activities, scaled back its workforce and made use of its
contingent liquidity sources. In addition to BLGs mortgage origination and sales activities, BLG
is also entitled to cash flows from mortgage assets that it owns or that are owned by its
affiliates and from asset management and other services provided by its affiliates. Accordingly,
the Company believes that BLG is capable of realizing positive cash flows that could be available
for distribution to its owners, including M&T, despite a lack of positive GAAP-earnings.
Nevertheless, if BLG is not able to realize sufficient cash flows for the benefit of M&T, the
Company may be required to recognize an other-than-temporary impairment charge in a future period
for some portion of the $256 million book value of its investment in BLG. Information about the
Companys relationship with BLG and its affiliates is included in note 13 of Notes to Financial
Statements.
- 72 -
Other revenues from operations totaled $106 million in the recent quarter, compared with $73
million in 2008s third quarter and $77 million in the second quarter of 2009. Reflected in those
revenues in the recent quarter was the $29 million gain recorded on the Bradford acquisition
transaction. Included in other revenues from operations were the following significant components.
Letter of credit and other credit-related fees totaled $25 million in the recent quarter, $23
million in the third quarter of 2008 and $28 million in the second quarter of 2009. Tax-exempt
income from bank owned life insurance, which includes increases in the cash surrender value of life
insurance policies and benefits received, totaled $14 million in the recent quarter, $12 million in
the year-earlier quarter and $13 million in 2009s second quarter. Revenues from merchant discount
and credit card fees were $10 million in each of the quarters ended September 30, 2009, September
30, 2008 and June 30, 2009. Insurance-related sales commissions and other revenues totaled $12
million in each of the two most recent quarters, compared with $7 million in the quarter ended
September 30, 2008.
Other income totaled $782 million in the first nine months of 2009, compared with $698 million
in the corresponding 2008 period. Gains and losses on bank investment securities (including
other-than-temporary impairment losses) totaled to net losses of $103 million in the first nine
months of 2009 and $124 million in the similar 2008 period. Excluding gains and losses from bank
investment securities, other income was $885 million in the nine-month period ended September 30,
2009, compared with $822 million in the corresponding 2008 period. Contributing to that
improvement was the $29 million gain on the Bradford transaction, along with higher mortgage
banking revenues, service charges on deposit accounts and a smaller loss related to M&Ts equity in
the operations of BLG, partially offset by declines in trust and brokerage services income and
lower gains realized from the sale of previously-leased equipment.
For the first nine months of 2009, mortgage banking revenues aggregated $157 million, up 35%
from $116 million in the year-earlier period. Residential mortgage banking revenues rose 47% to
$129 million during the nine-month period ended September 30, 2009 from $88 million in the
corresponding 2008 period. Residential mortgage loans originated for sale to other investors were
$4.9 billion in the first three quarters of 2009, compared with $3.4 billion in the similar 2008
period. Realized gains from sales of residential mortgage loans and loan servicing rights and
recognized unrealized gains and losses on residential mortgage loans held for sale, commitments to
originate loans for sale and commitments to sell loans aggregated to gains of $64 million and $23
million during the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
Revenues from servicing residential mortgage loans for others were $61 million and $60 million
for the first nine-months of 2009 and 2008, respectively. Included in such amounts were revenues
related to purchased servicing rights associated with the previously noted small balance commercial
mortgage loans of $22 million for each of the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2009 and 2008.
Commercial mortgage banking revenues totaled $29 million during each of the first nine months of
2009 and 2008.
Service charges on deposit accounts rose 6% to $342 million during the first nine months of
2009 from $324 million in the corresponding 2008 period. That improvement resulted from the impact
of the acquisition of Provident. Trust income declined 17% to $99 million from $120 million a year
earlier, and brokerage services income decreased 12% to $43 million during the first nine months of
2009 from $49 million in the similar 2008 period. The declines in trust and brokerage services
income were largely attributable to lower fees for providing services that are tied to the
performance of bond and equity markets. Trading account and foreign exchange activity resulted in
gains of $16 million for each of the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2009 and 2008. M&Ts
investment in BLG resulted in losses of $15 million
- 73 -
for the nine months ended September 30, 2009,
compared with losses of $29 million in the year-earlier period. Investment securities gains and
losses totaled to losses of $103 million and $124 million during the first nine months of 2009 and
2008, respectively. Included in those amounts were other-than-temporary impairment losses of $104
million and $158 million during those respective periods. Partially offsetting the 2008 impairment
losses was a $33 million gain recognized from the mandatory redemption of common shares of Visa
during the first quarter of 2008.
Other revenues from operations were $243 million in the first nine months of 2009, up from
$226 million in the similar 2008 period. That increase reflects the $29 million gain recognized on
the Bradford transaction in 2009 offset, in part, by lower gains realized from the sale of
previously leased equipment and modest decreases in other miscellaneous fees and revenues.
Included in other revenues from operations during the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2009
and 2008 were letter of credit and other credit-related fees of $74 million and $77 million,
respectively, income from bank owned life insurance of $37 million and $35 million, respectively,
merchant discount and credit card fees of $30 million in each period, and insurance-related sales
commissions and other revenues of $30 million and $25 million, respectively.
Other Expense
Other expense aggregated $500 million in the third quarter of 2009, 15% higher than $435 million in
the year-earlier period, but 11% below $564 million in 2009s second quarter. Included in the
amounts noted above are expenses considered by management to be nonoperating in nature consisting
of amortization of core deposit and other intangible assets of $17 million and $16 million in the
third quarters of 2009 and 2008 and $15 million in the
second quarter of 2009 and merger-related expenses of $14 million and $66 million in the
three-month periods ended September 30, 2009 and June 30, 2009, respectively. There were no
merger-related expenses in the third quarter of 2008. Exclusive of these nonoperating expenses,
noninterest operating expenses totaled $469 million in the recent quarter, compared with $419
million in the third quarter of 2008 and $482 million in the second quarter of 2009. As compared
with the third quarter of 2008, the recent quarters rise in operating expenses was due, in large
part, to the operations obtained in the 2009 acquisitions and higher deposit insurance assessments.
The decline in operating expenses from the second to the third 2009 quarter was due to the $33
million special deposit insurance assessment levied by the FDIC in 2009s second quarter, partially
offset by higher operating expenses resulting from the 2009 acquisition transactions.
Other expense for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2009 aggregated $1.50 billion, up
$222 million or 17% from $1.28 billion in the corresponding 2008 period. Included in those amounts
are expenses considered to be nonoperating in nature consisting of amortization of core deposit
and other intangible assets of $48 million and $51 million in the first nine months of 2009 and
2008, respectively, and merger-related expenses of $83 million and $4 million in those respective
periods. Exclusive of these nonoperating expenses, noninterest operating expenses through the
first nine months of 2009 increased $146 million or 12% to $1.37 billion from $1.23 billion in the
similar 2008 period. The most significant factor for that increase was a rise of $72 million for
deposit insurance. Also contributing to the increase were costs associated with the acquired
operations of Provident and Bradford and higher foreclosurerelated costs. Table 2 provides a
reconciliation of other expense to noninterest operating expense.
Salaries and employee benefits expense totaled $255 million in the third quarter of 2009,
compared with $237 million in the similar 2008 quarter and $250 million in the second quarter of
2009. For the first three quarters
- 74 -
of 2009, salaries and employee benefits expense rose 4% to $755
million from $725 million in the year-earlier period. The higher expense levels in 2009 as
compared with 2008 reflect the impact of the 2009 acquisition transactions and included
merger-related expenses of $1 million and $10 million for the three- and nine-month periods ended
September 30, 2009. Those expenses consisted predominantly of severance expense for Provident
employees. Stock-based compensation totaled $10 million during each of the quarters ended
September 30, 2009 and September 30, 2008, $11 million during the quarter ended June 30, 2009, and
$43 million and $39 million for the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2009 and 2008,
respectively. The number of full-time equivalent employees was 13,921 at September 30, 2009,
12,914 at September 30, 2008, 12,978 at December 31, 2008 and 14,187 at June 30, 2009. The rise in
full-time equivalent employees at the 2009 dates resulted predominantly from the acquisition of
Provident.
Excluding the nonoperating expense items described earlier from each quarter, nonpersonnel
operating expenses were $215 million in the third quarter of 2009, compared with $182 million in
the similar quarter of 2008 and $241 million in the second quarter of 2009. On the same basis,
such expenses were $627 million and $501 million during the first nine months of 2009 and 2008,
respectively. The rise in nonpersonnel operating expenses in 2009s third quarter as compared with
the year-earlier quarter was due, in part, to higher deposit insurance assessments and costs
associated with the acquired operations of Provident. The decline in the level of expense in
2009s third quarter as compared with the second quarter of 2009 was largely the result of the $33
million special deposit insurance assessment levied by the FDIC in the second quarter of 2009.
Also contributing to the lower expenses in the recent quarter was a decrease in costs related to
foreclosed residential real estate properties, including write-downs of the carrying values of some
properties during the second 2009 quarter resulting from lower appraised values. Partially
offsetting the lower expenses noted in the
recent quarter was a $13 million reversal of a portion of the valuation allowance for
capitalized residential mortgage servicing rights in the second quarter of 2009. There was no
change in such valuation allowance during the recent quarter. Contributing to the rise in
nonpersonnel expenses in the first nine months of 2009 as compared with the corresponding period in
2008 were higher costs for deposit insurance and expenses related to the foreclosure process for
residential real estate properties. In total, deposit insurance costs during the third quarter of
2009 were $21 million, compared with $2 million and $50 million in the third quarter of 2008 and
the second quarter of 2009, respectively. For the nine-month periods ended September 30, deposit
insurance expense aggregated $77 million in 2009 and $5 million in 2008. A $15 million reversal in the first
quarter of 2008 of an accrual established during the fourth quarter
of 2007 for estimated losses stemming from certain litigation involving Visa (Covered Litigation)
also contributed to the year-over-year variance. As part of Visas initial public offering, M&T
Bank and other member banks are obligated to share in losses from the Covered Litigation. As Visa
settles the Covered Litigation and provides information regarding any such settlements to its
member banks, increases or decreases in M&Ts accrual for Covered Litigation are possible.
Finally, costs associated with the acquired operations of Provident contributed to the higher level
of operating expenses during the first nine months of 2009. Partially offsetting those factors was
the impact of partial reversals of the valuation allowance for impairment of residential mortgage
servicing rights, which totaled $18 million and $3 million during the nine-month periods ended
September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
The efficiency ratio, or noninterest operating expenses (as defined above) divided by the sum
of taxable-equivalent net interest income and noninterest income (exclusive of gains and losses
from bank investment securities and gains on merger transactions), measures the relationship of
noninterest operating expenses to revenues. The Companys efficiency ratio was 55.2% during each
of the quarters ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, and
- 75 -
60.0% in the second quarter of 2009. The
efficiency ratios for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 were 57.9% and 53.5%,
respectively. If the second quarter 2009 special assessment by the FDIC was excluded from the
computations, the efficiency ratio for the second quarter of 2009 would have been 56.0%, and for
the nine-month period ended September 30, 2009 would have been 56.5%. Noninterest operating
expenses used in calculating the efficiency ratio exclude the amortization of core deposit and
other intangible assets and the merger-related expenses noted earlier. If charges for
amortization of core deposit and other intangible assets were included, the efficiency ratio for
each of the three-month periods ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 would have been 57.2%, compared
with 61.9% for the second quarter of 2009, and for the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2009
and 2008 would have been 59.9% and 55.7%, respectively.
Income Taxes
The provision for income taxes for the third quarter of 2009 was $44 million, compared with an
income tax benefit of $25 million in the third quarter of 2008 and expense of $11 million in the
second quarter of 2009. The recent quarters provision for income taxes was reduced as a result of
a $10 million reversal of taxes accrued in earlier periods for previously uncertain tax positions
in various jurisdictions. The income tax benefit recorded in the year-earlier quarter reflects the
resolution of previously uncertain tax positions related to the Companys activities in various
jurisdictions during the years 1999-2007 that allowed the Company to reduce its accrual for income
taxes in late September 2008 by $40 million. Exclusive of the impact of the $10 million and $40
million credits to income taxes in the quarters ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively,
the effective tax rates were 31.5% in the third quarter of 2009 and 22.7% in the third quarter of
2008. Those rates compare with 18.1% in the quarter ended June 30, 2009. The effective
tax rate is affected by the level of income earned that is exempt from tax, the level of income
allocated to the various state and local jurisdictions where the Company operates, because tax
rates differ among such jurisdictions, and the impact of any large but infrequently occurring
items. For example, although the higher merger-related expenses incurred during the second quarter
of 2009 are predominantly deductible for purposes of computing income tax expense, those charges
had an impact on the effective tax rate because they lowered pre-tax income relative to the amounts
of tax-exempt income and other permanent differences that impact the effective tax rate. For the
nine-month periods ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, the provision for income taxes was $75
million and $156 million, respectively, resulting in effective tax rates of 23.6% in 2009 and 25.6%
in 2008.
The Companys effective tax rate in future periods will be affected by the results of
operations allocated to the various tax jurisdictions within which the Company operates, any change
in income tax regulations within those jurisdictions, or interpretations of income tax regulations
that differ from the Companys interpretations by any of various tax authorities that may examine
tax returns filed by M&T or any of its subsidiaries.
Capital
Stockholders equity was $7.6 billion at September 30, 2009, representing 11.03% of total assets,
compared with $6.4 billion or 9.83% of total assets a year earlier and $6.8 billion or 10.31% at
December 31, 2008. Included in stockholders equity at September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008
was $600 million of Fixed Rate Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series A, and warrants to
purchase M&T common stock issued on December 23, 2008 as part of the U.S. Treasury Capital Purchase
Program. Provident also participated in the U.S. Treasury Capital Purchase Program in November
2008. As a result, Providents $151.5 million of preferred stock related thereto was converted
- 76 -
to M&T Fixed Rate Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series C, with warrants to purchase M&T common
stock. The holder of the Series A and Series C preferred stock is entitled to cumulative cash
dividends of 5% per annum for five years after the date of initial issuance and 9% per annum
thereafter, payable quarterly in arrears. That preferred stock is redeemable at the option of M&T,
subject to regulatory approval. M&T also obtained another series of preferred stock as part of the
Provident acquisition that was converted to $26.5 million of M&T Series B Mandatory Convertible
Non-Cumulative Preferred Stock, liquidation preference of $1,000 per share. The 26,500 shares of
the Series B Preferred Stock will automatically convert into 433,148 shares of M&T common stock on
April 1, 2011. The Series B Preferred Stock pays dividends at a rate of 10% per annum on the
liquidation preference of $1,000 per share, payable quarterly in arrears. The estimated fair
values ascribed to the preferred stock and warrants to purchase common stock of M&T associated with
the acquisition of Provident were $156 million and $6 million, respectively, on the May 23, 2009
acquisition date.
Common stockholders equity was $6.9 billion, or $58.22 per share, at September 30, 2009,
compared with $6.4 billion, or $58.17 per share, at September 30, 2008 and $6.2 billion, or $56.29
per share, at December 31, 2008. Tangible equity per common share, which excludes goodwill and
core deposit and other intangible assets and applicable deferred tax balances, was $27.03 at the
end of the third quarter of 2009, compared with $27.67 a year earlier and $25.94 at December 31,
2008. The Companys ratio of tangible common equity to tangible assets was 4.89% at September 30,
2009, compared with 4.93% a year earlier and 4.49% at June 30, 2009. Reconciliations of total
common stockholders equity and tangible common equity and total assets and tangible assets as of
each of those respective dates are presented in table 2.
Stockholders equity reflects accumulated other comprehensive income or loss, which includes
the net after-tax impact of unrealized gains or losses on available-for-sale investment securities,
gains or losses associated with interest rate swap agreements designated as cash flow hedges, and
adjustments to reflect the funded status of defined benefit pension and other postretirement plans.
Net unrealized losses on available-for-sale investment securities, net of applicable tax effect,
were $248 million, or $2.09 per common share, at September 30, 2009, compared with similar losses
of $405 million, or $3.67 per common share, at September 30, 2008 and $557 million, or $5.04 per
common share, at December 31, 2008. Such unrealized losses represent the difference, net of
applicable income tax effect, between the estimated fair value and amortized cost of investment
securities classified as available for sale, including the remaining unamortized unrealized losses
on investment securities that have been transferred to held to maturity.
Reflected in net unrealized losses at September 30, 2009 were pre tax-effect unrealized losses
of $522 million on available-for-sale investment securities with an amortized cost of $2.6 billion
and pre-tax effect unrealized gains of $209 million on securities with an amortized cost of $4.2
billion. The pre-tax effect unrealized losses reflect $424 million of losses on $2.2 billion of
privately issued mortgage-backed securities considered Level 3 valuations and $70 million of losses
on $227 million of trust preferred securities issued by financial institutions generally considered
Level 2 valuations.
The Companys privately issued mortgage-backed securities classified as available for sale are
generally collateralized by prime and Alt-A residential mortgage loans as depicted in the
accompanying table. Information in the table is as of September 30, 2009. As with any accounting
estimate or other data, changes in fair values and investment ratings may occur at any time.
- 77 -
PRIVATELY ISSUED MORTGAGE-BACKED SECURITIES CLASSIFIED AS AVAILABLE FOR SALE (a)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a percentage of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net |
|
|
carrying value |
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
unrealized |
|
|
AAA |
|
|
Investment |
|
|
Senior |
|
|
|
cost |
|
|
value |
|
|
gains(losses) |
|
|
rated |
|
|
grade |
|
|
tranche |
|
Collateral type |
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgage loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prime Fixed |
|
$ |
420,189 |
|
|
|
419,467 |
|
|
|
(722 |
) |
|
|
90 |
% |
|
|
93 |
% |
|
|
99 |
% |
Prime Hybrid ARMs |
|
|
1,807,437 |
|
|
|
1,506,143 |
|
|
|
(301,294 |
) |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
95 |
|
Prime Other |
|
|
106,352 |
|
|
|
98,593 |
|
|
|
(7,759 |
) |
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
95 |
|
|
|
68 |
|
Alt-A Fixed |
|
|
10,947 |
|
|
|
12,232 |
|
|
|
1,285 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
86 |
|
Alt-A Hybrid ARMs |
|
|
246,114 |
|
|
|
144,618 |
|
|
|
(101,496 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
73 |
|
Alt-A Option ARMs |
|
|
457 |
|
|
|
236 |
|
|
|
(221 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
5,303 |
|
|
|
2,948 |
|
|
|
(2,355 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
89 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal |
|
|
2,596,799 |
|
|
|
2,184,237 |
|
|
|
(412,562 |
) |
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
93 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial mortgage loans |
|
|
34,825 |
|
|
|
23,541 |
|
|
|
(11,284 |
) |
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
2,631,624 |
|
|
|
2,207,778 |
|
|
|
(423,846 |
) |
|
|
31 |
% |
|
|
70 |
% |
|
|
93 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
All information is as of September 30, 2009. |
Due to the severe disruption in the credit markets during the second half of 2008 and
continuing into 2009, trading activity for privately issued mortgage-backed securities was
dramatically reduced. In estimating values for such securities, the Company was significantly
restricted in the level of market observable assumptions used in the valuation of its privately
issued
mortgage-backed securities portfolio. Because of the inactivity and the lack of observable
valuation inputs, the Company transferred $2.2 billion of its privately issued mortgage-backed
securities portfolio from Level 2 to Level 3 valuations in the third quarter of 2008. The
remaining portion of its portfolio of privately issued mortgage-backed securities had already been
classified as Level 3. To assist in the determination of fair value for its privately issued
mortgage-backed securities, the Company engaged two independent pricing sources at September 30,
2009 and December 31, 2008. In determining fair value of those securities at December 31, 2008, in
general, the Company averaged the results obtained from the independent sources. In April 2009,
new accounting guidance was provided for estimating fair value when the volume and level of trading
activity for an asset or liability have significantly decreased. In consideration of the new
guidance, the Company performed internal modeling to estimate the cash flows and fair value of 148
of its privately issued residential mortgage-backed securities with an amortized cost basis of $2.0
billion at September 30, 2009. The Companys internal modeling techniques included discounting
estimated bond-specific cash flows using assumptions about cash flows associated with loans
underlying each of the bonds. In estimating those cash flows, the Company used conservative
assumptions as to future delinquency, default and loss rates in order to mitigate exposure that
might be attributable to the risk that actual future credit losses could exceed assumed credit
losses. Differences between internal model valuations and external pricing indications were
generally considered to be reflective of the lack of liquidity in the market for privately issued
mortgage-backed securities. To determine the most representative fair value for each of the 148
bonds under current market conditions, M&T computed values based on judgmentally applied weightings
of the internal model valuations and the indications obtained from the average of the two
independent pricing sources. Weightings applied to internal model valuations were generally
dependent on bond structure and collateral type, with prices for bonds in non-senior tranches
generally receiving lower weightings on the internal model results and greater
- 78 -
weightings of the
valuation data provided by the independent pricing sources. As a result, certain valuations of
privately issued residential mortgage-backed securities were determined by reference to independent
pricing sources without adjustment. The average weight placed on internal model valuations was
36%, compared with a 64% weighting on valuations provided by the independent sources. Generally,
the range of weights placed on internal valuations was between 0% and 40%. The impact of relying
on the guidance provided by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) and using an internal
valuation modeling technique was to increase accumulated other comprehensive income at September
30, 2009 by $89 million ($141 million pre-tax). Further information concerning the Companys
valuations of privately issued mortgage-backed securities can be found in note 10 of Notes to
Financial Statements.
For the quarter ended September 30, 2009 the Company recognized $47 million (pre-tax) of
other-than-temporary impairment losses related to privately issued residential mortgage-backed
securities with an amortized cost basis (before impairment charge) of $134 million and securities
backed by trust preferred securities issued by financial institutions with an amortized cost basis
(before impairment charge) of $6 million. Those other-than-temporary impairment losses were
determined in accordance with GAAP and, therefore, reflect the estimated credit losses on the
impaired securities. The other-than-temporary impairment losses recognized in the consolidated
statement of income were net of $17 million of unrealized losses for the same securities resulting
from other factors that have been reflected in accumulated other comprehensive income. Despite
rising levels of delinquencies and losses in the underlying residential mortgage loan collateral,
given credit enhancements resulting from the structures of individual bonds, the Company has
concluded that as of September 30, 2009 its remaining privately issued mortgage-backed securities
were not other-than-temporarily impaired. Nevertheless, given recent market conditions, it is possible that
adverse changes in repayment performance and fair value could occur in the remainder of 2009 and
later years that could impact the Companys conclusions. Management has modeled cash flows from
privately issued mortgage-backed securities under various scenarios and has concluded that even if
home price depreciation and current delinquency trends persist for an extended period of time, the
Companys principal losses on its privately issued mortgage-backed securities would be
substantially less than their current fair valuation losses.
As of September 30, 2009, based on a review of each of the remaining securities in the
investment securities portfolio, the Company concluded that it expects to recover its amortized
cost basis for such securities. Accordingly, the Company concluded that the declines in the values
of those securities were temporary and that additional other-than-temporary impairment charges were
not appropriate at September 30, 2009. As of that date, the Company did not intend to sell nor is
it anticipated that it would be required to sell any of its impaired securities, that is where fair
value is less than the cost basis of the security. The Company intends to closely monitor the
performance of the privately issued mortgage-backed securities and other securities to assess if
changes in their underlying credit performance or other events cause the cost basis of those
securities to become other-than-temporarily impaired. However, because the unrealized losses on
available-for-sale investment securities have generally already been reflected in the financial
statement values for investment securities and stockholders equity, any recognition of an
other-than-temporary decline in value of those investment securities would not have a material
effect on the Companys consolidated financial condition. Any other-than-temporary impairment
charge related to held-to-maturity securities would result in reductions in the financial statement
values for investment securities and stockholders equity.
- 79 -
Adjustments to reflect the funded status of defined benefit pension and other postretirement
plans, net of applicable tax effect, reduced accumulated other comprehensive income by $173
million, or $1.46 per common share, at September 30, 2009, $47 million, or $.43 per common share,
at September 30, 2008 and $174 million, or $1.58 per common share, at December 31, 2008. The
increase in such adjustment at September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 as compared with September
30, 2008 was predominantly the result of actual investment performance of assets held by the
Companys qualified pension plan being significantly worse than that assumed for actuarial
purposes. During the second 2009 quarter, the Company contributed 900,000 shares of M&T common
stock having a then fair value of $44 million to the Companys qualified defined benefit pension
plan. Those shares were issued from previously held treasury stock.
Cash dividends paid on M&Ts common stock during the quarter ended September 30, 2009 totaled
$83 million, compared with $77 million and $82 million in the quarters ended September 30, 2008 and
June 30, 2009, respectively, and represented a quarterly dividend payment of $.70 per common share
in each of those quarters. Common stock dividends during the nine-month periods ended September
30, 2009 and 2008 were $243 million and $231 million, respectively. A cash dividend of $7.5
million, or $12.50 per share, was paid in each of the second and third quarters of 2009 to the U.S.
Treasury on M&Ts Series A Preferred Stock, issued on December 23, 2008. For the first nine months
of 2009, such dividends totaled $19 million, or $32.22 per share. Cash dividends of $663 thousand
and $1.9 million ($25.00 per share and $12.50 per share) were paid on M&Ts Series B and Series C
Preferred Stock, respectively, during the third quarter of 2009. Those series of preferred stock
were created in connection with the Provident transaction. No similar dividends were paid during
the second quarter of 2009.
The Company did not repurchase any shares of its common stock during 2008 or the first nine
months of 2009.
Federal regulators generally require banking institutions to maintain Tier 1 capital and
total capital ratios of at least 4% and 8%, respectively, of risk-adjusted total assets. In
addition to the risk-based measures, Federal bank regulators have also implemented a minimum
Tier 1 leverage ratio guideline of 3% of the quarterly average of total assets. At September 30, 2009,
Tier 1 capital included trust preferred securities of $1.1 billion as described in note 4 of Notes
to Financial Statements, and total capital further included subordinated capital notes of $1.6
billion.
The regulatory capital ratios of the Company, M&T Bank and M&T Bank, N.A., as of September 30,
2009 are presented in the accompanying table.
REGULATORY CAPITAL RATIOS
September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M&T |
|
M&T |
|
M&T |
|
|
(Consolidated) |
|
Bank |
|
Bank, N.A. |
Tier 1 capital |
|
|
8.42 |
% |
|
|
7.62 |
% |
|
|
16.23 |
% |
Total capital |
|
|
12.15 |
% |
|
|
11.40 |
% |
|
|
16.58 |
% |
Tier 1 leverage |
|
|
8.28 |
% |
|
|
7.46 |
% |
|
|
18.85 |
% |
Segment Information
As required by GAAP, the Companys reportable segments have been determined based upon its internal
profitability reporting system, which is organized by strategic business unit. Financial
information about the Companys segments is presented in note 12 of Notes to Financial Statements.
- 80 -
The Business Banking segments net income totaled $34 million in the third quarter of 2009, up
14% from the $30 million earned in the third quarter of 2008 and 10% higher than the $31 million
earned in the second quarter of 2009. As compared with the third quarter of 2008, a $13 million
rise in net interest income was partially offset by a $5 million increase in the provision for
credit losses, due to higher net charge-offs of loans, and higher deposit insurance expense of $2
million. Approximately three-fourths of the increase in net interest income was due to loans and
deposits obtained in the Provident acquisition. The improved performance as compared with the
second quarter of 2009 resulted from a $4 million decrease in deposit insurance expense, a $3
million increase in net interest income and a $2 million rise in fees earned for providing deposit
account services. The higher net interest income was primarily due to the full-quarter impact of
deposits and loans obtained in the Provident transaction, net of a 31 basis point narrowing of the
net interest margin on deposits. Partially offsetting those positive factors was a $5 million rise
in the provision for credit losses, reflecting higher net loan charge-offs. Net income for the
Business Banking segment totaled $95 million for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2009, up
3% from the $92 million earned in the similar 2008 period. That improvement was due to higher net
interest income of $24 million, largely the result of higher average deposit and loan balances of
$784 million and $390 million, respectively, partially offset by a $14 million increase in total
noninterest expenses, reflecting higher deposit insurance expense of $8 million and a $6 million
increase in the provision for credit losses, due to higher net charge-offs of loans. Approximately
three-fifths of the higher net interest income was due to the Provident transaction.
Net income earned by the Commercial Banking Segment aggregated $41 million in the recent
quarter, 31% below the $60 million earned in 2008s third quarter and down 41% from the $70 million
recorded in the immediately preceding quarter. The decline in net income as compared with the
third quarter of 2008 was the result of a $56 million increase in the provision for credit losses,
due to higher net charge-offs of loans, and a $9 million increase in other noninterest expenses,
including a $3 million increase in deposit insurance expense. The rise in net charge-offs in the
recent quarter was largely the result of a $42 million partial charge-off of a relationship with an
operator of retirement communities. Partially offsetting those factors was a $32 million rise in
net interest income, predominantly due to higher average deposit balances of $3.8 billion and a 46
basis point widening of the net interest margin on loans. Approximately one-fifth of the improvement in net interest income was the result of loans
and deposits obtained in the acquisition of Provident. Contributing to the decline in net income
in the recent quarter as compared with the second quarter of 2009 was a rise in the
provision for credit losses of $46 million, mostly due to higher net charge-offs of loans, lower
income from providing loan syndication services of $4 million, and a $3 million decrease in fees
earned for providing corporate advisory services. Those negative factors were partially offset by
higher net interest income of $3 million, due predominantly to the acquisition of Provident. Net contribution for this segment aggregated $168
million during the first nine months of 2009, 7% lower than the $180 million earned in the
year-earlier period. That decline in net contribution was the result of a $69 million increase in
the provision for credit losses, primarily due to higher net charge-offs of loans, a $12 million
increase in deposit insurance expense, and lower income related to loan syndication services and
end-of-term sales of commercial lease equipment of $9 million and $7 million, respectively. Those
factors were offset, in part, by a $76 million increase in net interest income, mainly due to a
$2.9 billion increase in average deposit balances, and a $4 million rise in fees earned for
providing deposit account services. Approximately ten percent of the rise in net interest income was due to the
acquisition of Provident.
- 81 -
The Commercial Real Estate segment contributed net income of $42 million in 2009s third
quarter, up 18% from $36 million in the year-earlier quarter and 80% above the $23 million earned
in the second quarter of 2009. The rise in net income as compared with the third quarter of 2008
was due to higher net interest income of $22 million, mainly due to the impact of a $1.9 billion
increase in average loan balances outstanding and a 30 basis point widening of the loan net
interest margin, partially offset by a higher provision for credit losses of $12 million,
reflecting an increase in net charge-offs of loans. Approximately one-half of the increase in net
interest income resulted from the impact of the Provident acquisition. As compared with the second
quarter of 2009, the increase in net income resulted from a lower provision for credit losses of
$24 million, reflecting a decline in net charge-offs of loans, and a $7 million increase in net
interest income, primarily due to the impact of the Provident transaction. During the second
quarter of 2009, net charge-offs reflected a $33 million charge-off of a loan to a single customer
within this sector. For the nine-month period ended September 30, 2009, the Commercial Real Estate
segments net income totaled $109 million, 10% lower than the $121 million earned in the
corresponding period of 2008. Contributing to that decline were the following unfavorable factors:
a $58 million increase in the provision for credit losses, predominately due to higher net
charge-offs of loans; lower other noninterest revenues of $4 million; and a $3 million increase in
deposit insurance expense. Those factors were partially offset by a $39 million increase in net
interest income and a $3 million decline in personnel costs. The increase in net interest income
was driven by higher average loan and deposit balances of $1.2 billion and $453 million,
respectively, and a 15 basis point widening of the net interest margin on loans. Nearly one-half
of the higher net interest income was due to the Provident acquisition.
The Discretionary Portfolio segment incurred net losses of $10 million, $78 million, and $3
million in the quarters ended September 30, 2009, September 30, 2008, and June 30, 2009,
respectively. Reflected in the results of the two most recent quarters and in the third quarter of 2008 were
other-than-temporary impairment charges (pre-tax) of $47 million, $25 million, and $153 million,
respectively. The impairment charges recorded in the two most recent quarters were on certain
private CMOs and CDOs backed by bank trust preferred securities, while the impairment charges
recorded in 2008s third quarter were on the Companys holdings of preferred stock issuances of
Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. All of the impairment charges relate to bonds or preferred stock held
in the Companys available-for-sale investment securities portfolio. As compared with the third
quarter of 2008, a decline in impairment charges as noted above, a $4 million increase in net
interest income and a $4 million reduction in foreclosure-related expenses were the main factors
for the recent quarters lower net loss. The increase in net interest income reflects the impact
of the Provident transaction and was largely due to a 13 basis point widening of this segments net
interest margin. The higher net loss as compared with the immediately preceding quarter reflects
the impact of the higher impairment charges during the recent quarter as described above, partially
offset by higher net interest income of $5 million, a decrease in the provision for credit losses
of $3 million and a $3 million rise in other noninterest revenues, largely income from bank owned
life insurance. Approximately four-fifths of the increase in net interest income resulted from the
Provident transaction. The Discretionary Portfolio segment incurred a net loss in the first nine
months of 2009 of $19 million, compared with a net loss in the similar 2008 period of $57 million.
Contributing to that improvement were a $54 million decline in other-than-temporary impairment
charges, a $10 million increase in net interest income and a $7 million decrease in
foreclosure-related costs, partially offset by a $9 million rise in the provision for credit
losses, driven by increased net charge-offs. The higher net interest income was primarily due to
the impact of the Provident acquisition.
- 82 -
The Residential Mortgage Banking segment recorded net income of $1 million in the three-month
period ended September 30, 2009, compared with net losses incurred in the third quarter of 2008 and
the second quarter of 2009 of $18 million and $11 million, respectively. The leading factors for
the improved performance as compared with 2008s third quarter include: a $21 million decline in
the provision for credit losses, primarily the result of reduced net charge-offs of loans to
builders and developers of residential real estate; higher noninterest revenues from residential
mortgage loan origination activities of $13 million, primarily resulting from increased volumes and
wider margins; and a $6 million rise in net interest income, mainly due to an 87 basis point
widening of the net interest margin on loans. Those factors were partially offset by higher
personnel and foreclosure-related costs of $4 million and $3 million, respectively. The favorable
results as compared with the second quarter of 2009 reflect a $19 million second quarter write-down
of the values of certain previously foreclosed-upon residential real estate development projects
(the result of updated appraised values) and a $14 million decline in the provision for credit
losses, primarily the result of lower net charge-offs of loans to builders and developers of
residential real estate. Those factors were partially offset by the impact of a $9 million partial
reversal of the capitalized mortgage servicing rights valuation allowance recorded in 2009s second
quarter (there was no change in such valuation allowance in the recent quarter) and lower
noninterest revenues from residential mortgage loan origination activities of $8 million. This
segment incurred a net loss of $4 million in the nine-month period ended September 30, 2009,
compared with a net loss of $23 million in the corresponding 2008 period. That improvement was the
result of: a $43 million rise in noninterest revenues from residential mortgage loan origination
activities, the result of increased volume and wider margins; a $15 million decrease in the
provision for credit losses, mostly due to
reduced net charge-offs of loans to builders and
developers of residential real estate; a higher partial reversal of the capitalized mortgage
servicing rights valuation allowance of $10 million; and higher net interest income of $4 million, due, in part, to a 44 basis point widening of the net interest margin on loans.
Partially offsetting those factors was a $41 million increase in total noninterest expenses
(excluding the capitalized mortgage servicing rights valuation allowance reversal), reflecting a
$25 million rise in foreclosure-related costs, including the previously mentioned second quarter
2009 real estate valuation write-down.
Net contribution from the Retail Banking segment totaled $74 million in the third quarter of
2009, up 27% from the $58 million earned in the corresponding 2008 period and 37% higher than the
$54 million earned in 2009s second quarter. Contributing to the higher net income as compared
with the third quarter of 2008 was an increase in net interest income of $33 million and a $17
million rise in fees earned for providing deposit account services resulting from the Provident
acquisition. The net interest income improvement reflects higher average balances of deposits
($3.2 billion) and loans ($1.3 billion) obtained in the Provident acquisition, and a 39 basis point
widening of the net interest margin on loans. Partially offsetting those positive factors were a
$9 million rise in personnel costs, increased net occupancy expenses of $7 million, higher deposit
insurance expense of $6 million, and a $3 million increase in the provision for credit losses,
resulting from higher net charge-offs of consumer loans. The increases in personnel and net
occupancy costs were primarily related to operations acquired in the Provident transaction. As
compared with the immediately preceding quarter, the higher net income reflects lower deposit
insurance expense of $18 million, higher deposit account service fees of $14 million (approximately
two-thirds due to the acquisition of Provident), a decline in other noninterest expenses of $5
million, including reduced expenses for credit card and merchant-related services, and a $3 million
lower provision for credit losses. The decline in deposit insurance costs resulted from the second
quarter 2009 special assessment levied by the FDIC. Those favorable
- 83 -
factors were offset, in part,
by increases in net occupancy and personnel costs of $8 million and $6 million, respectively, each
largely the result of the operations acquired from Provident. Through September 30, 2009, net
income for this segment aggregated $181 million, down 8% from the $197 million earned in the first
nine months of 2008. That decline was due to the following factors: a $36 million rise in deposit
insurance expense (reflecting the special assessment by the FDIC); a higher provision for credit
losses of $31 million, resulting from higher net charge-offs of consumer loans; and increases of
$11 million and $9 million in net occupancy and personnel costs, respectively. The increases in
net occupancy and personnel costs were predominately the result of operations added with the
Provident acquisition. Partially offsetting those unfavorable factors were a $42 million increase
in net interest income and a $14 million rise in fees earned for providing deposit account services
to Provident customers. The higher net interest income was due, in part, to a $2.4 billion
increase in average deposit balances (approximately half of that increase was due to the impact of
the Provident transaction).
The All Other category reflects other activities of the Company that are not directly
attributable to the reported segments. Reflected in this category are the amortization of core
deposit and other intangible assets resulting from the acquisitions of financial institutions,
M&Ts equity in the earnings of BLG, merger-related gains and expenses resulting from acquisitions
of financial institutions and the net impact of the Companys allocation methodologies for internal
funds transfer pricing and the provision for credit losses. The various components of the All
Other category resulted in net losses of $54 million and $113 million in the two most recent
quarters, compared with net income of $4 million in the third quarter of 2008. The following
unfavorable factors contributed to the net
loss in the most recent quarter as compared with the net
income recorded in the year-earlier quarter: the impact from the Companys allocation methodologies for internal
transfers for funding charges and credits associated with the earning assets and interest-bearing
liabilities of the Companys reportable segments and the provision for credit losses; the impact of
a $10 million reduction of income tax expense resulting from the reversal of taxes previously
accrued for uncertain tax positions in various jurisdictions, compared with a $40 million reduction
of income tax expense recorded in 2008s third quarter relating to M&Ts resolution of certain tax
issues from its activities in various jurisdictions; a $15 million increase in other noninterest
expenses of the business and support units included in the All Other category; higher
merger-related expenses associated with the Provident and Bradford acquisitions of $14 million; and
an increase in deposit insurance expense of $8 million. Partially offsetting those unfavorable
factors was a $29 million (pre-tax) merger-related gain recorded on the Bradford transaction.
Several factors contributed to the lower net loss in the third quarter of 2009 as compared with the
immediately preceding quarter including: a $52 million decline in merger-related expenses; the
previously mentioned $29 million merger-related gain from the Bradford transaction; and the
previously mentioned $10 million recent quarter reduction of income tax expense. Partially
offsetting those favorable factors was an $11 million (pre-tax) reduction in the Companys share of
the operating results of BLG (inclusive of interest expense to fund that investment). For the
first nine months of 2009, the All Other category reported a net loss of $286 million, compared
with a net loss of $56 million in the similar 2008 period. The higher net loss in 2009 is attributable to the following unfavorable factors: the impact from the
Companys allocation methodologies for internal transfers for funding charges and credits
associated with the earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities of the Companys reportable
segments and the provision for credit losses; $83 million of merger-related expenses associated
with the Provident and Bradford acquisitions recorded in the first nine months of 2009, compared
with $4 million of merger-related expenses in the corresponding 2008 period related to acquisition
transactions completed
- 84 -
in the fourth quarter of 2007; Visa-related transactions that were recorded
in the first quarter of 2008, including a $33 million gain realized from the mandatory partial
redemption of Visa stock owned by M&T Bank and $15 million related to the reversal of Visa
litigation-related accruals initially recorded in 2007s fourth quarter; the impact of the $10
million and $40 million reductions of income tax expense noted above; lower trust income of $21
million; a $17 million increase in personnel costs associated with the business and support units
included in the All Other category; a $10 million increase in deposit insurance expense; and a $6
million increase in charitable contributions made to the M&T Charitable Foundation. Those factors
were offset by the previously noted $29 million merger-related gain, and a $15 million improvement
from M&Ts share of the operating results of BLG (inclusive of interest expense to fund that
investment).
Recent Accounting Developments
In September 2009, the FASB amended fair value measurement and disclosure guidance to permit the
use of net asset value per share of certain investments as a practical expedient to measuring fair
value. To qualify, the investment must be required or permitted to be measured or disclosed at
fair value on a recurring or nonrecurring basis, must not have a readily determinable fair value
and must have the defined attributes of an investment company. The guidance is effective for
interim and annual periods ending after December 15, 2009, with early adoption permitted. The
Company does not anticipate that the adoption of the guidance will have a significant impact on the
reporting of its financial position or results of its operations.
In August 2009, the FASB issued clarifying guidance on the fair value measurement of
liabilities, which indicates that in circumstances in which a quoted price in an active market for
the identical liability is not available, a reporting entity is required to measure fair value
using one or more specified techniques. These techniques consist of a valuation technique that
uses the quoted price of the identical liability when traded as an asset or quoted prices for
similar liabilities or similar liabilities when traded as assets, or another valuation technique
that is consistent with the principles of fair value measurements and disclosures. The guidance is
effective for the first interim or annual reporting period beginning after issuance. The Company
does not anticipate that the adoption of the guidance will have a significant impact on the
reporting of its financial position or results of its operations.
In June 2009, the FASB amended accounting guidance relating to the consolidation of variable
interest entities to eliminate the quantitative approach previously required for determining the
primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity. The amended guidance instead requires a
reporting entity to qualitatively assess the determination of the primary beneficiary of a variable
interest entity based on whether the reporting entity has the power to direct the activities that
most significantly impact the variable interest entitys economic performance and has the
obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits of the variable interest entity that
could potentially be significant to the variable interest entity. The amended guidance requires
ongoing reassessments of whether the reporting entity is the primary beneficiary of a variable
interest entity. The amended guidance is effective as of the beginning of the first annual
reporting period that begins after November 15, 2009, for interim periods within that first annual
reporting period, and for interim and annual reporting periods thereafter. Earlier adoption is
prohibited. The Company is still evaluating the impact that the new provisions will have on its
financial statements.
- 85 -
In June 2009, the FASB also issued amended accounting guidance relating to accounting for
transfers of financial assets to eliminate the exceptions for qualifying special purpose entities
from the consolidation guidance and the exception that permitted sale accounting for certain
mortgage securitizations when a transferor has not surrendered control over the transferred assets.
The amended guidance is effective as of the beginning of the first annual reporting period that
begins after November 15, 2009, for interim periods within that first annual reporting period, and
for interim and annual reporting periods thereafter. Earlier adoption is prohibited. The
recognition and measurement provisions of the amended guidance should be applied to transfers that
occur on or after the effective date. Additionally, on and after the effective date, the concept
of a qualifying special-purpose entity will no longer be relevant for accounting purposes.
Therefore, formerly qualifying special-purpose entities will be evaluated for consolidation on and
after the effective date in accordance with applicable consolidation guidance, including the new
accounting guidance relating to the consolidation of variable interest entities discussed in the
previous paragraph. The Company is still evaluating the impact that the new provisions will have
on its financial statements.
In December 2007, the FASB issued a revision of the business combinations accounting standard.
The revised guidance retains the fundamental requirements of the previous accounting standard that
the acquisition method of accounting be used for all business combinations and for an acquirer to
be identified for each business combination. The revised accounting guidance defines the acquirer
as the entity that obtains control of one or more businesses in the business combination and
establishes the acquisition date as the date the acquirer achieves control. The revised accounting
guidance retains the provisions in the previous accounting standard for identifying and recognizing
intangible assets separately from goodwill. With limited
exceptions, the revised guidance requires an acquirer to recognize the assets acquired,
the liabilities assumed and any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree at the acquisition date,
measured at their fair value as of that date. That replaces the previous accounting standards
cost-allocation process, which required the cost of an acquisition to be allocated to the
individual assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair values. As a
result, certain acquisition-related costs previously included in the cost of an acquisition are now
required to be expensed as incurred. In addition, certain restructuring costs previously recognized
as if they were an assumed liability from an acquisition are also required to be expensed. The
revised accounting guidance also requires the acquirer in a business combination achieved in stages
(sometimes referred to as a step acquisition) to recognize the identifiable assets and liabilities,
as well as the noncontrolling interest in the acquiree, at the full amounts of their fair values.
The revised accounting guidance requires an acquirer to recognize goodwill as of the acquisition
date measured as a residual, which in most types of business combinations will result in measuring
goodwill as the excess of the consideration transferred plus the fair value of any noncontrolling
interest in the acquiree at the acquisition date over the fair value of the identifiable net assets
acquired. The revised accounting guidance also eliminates the recognition of a separate valuation
allowance, such as an allowance for credit losses, as of the acquisition date for assets acquired
in a business combination that are measured at their acquisition-date fair values because the
effects of uncertainty about future cash flows should be included in the fair value measurement of
those assets. The revised accounting guidance must be applied prospectively to business
combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual
reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2008. Earlier adoption is prohibited. The
adoption of the revised accounting guidance significantly impacts the accounting for acquisitions
consummated in 2009 and beyond, including the Companys acquisition of Provident in a
stock-for-stock transaction, which was completed on May 23, 2009, and the FDIC-assisted
- 86 -
Bradford transaction, which was completed on August 28, 2009. Information concerning the Provident and
Bradford transactions is included in note 2 of Notes to Financial Statements.
In April 2009, the FASB issued amended accounting rules relating to the accounting for assets
acquired and liabilities assumed in a business combination that arise from contingencies to amend
and clarify the business combination accounting standard to address application issues with respect
to initial recognition and measurement, subsequent measurement and accounting, and disclosure of
assets and liabilities arising from contingencies in a business combination. This guidance applies
to all assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a business combination that arise from
contingencies, except for assets or liabilities arising from contingencies that are subject to
specific provisions in the business combinations accounting rules. The accounting guidance
requires an acquirer to recognize at fair value, at the acquisition date, an asset acquired or a
liability assumed in a business combination that arises from a contingency if the acquisition-date
fair value of that asset or liability can be determined during the measurement period. If the
acquisition-date fair value of an asset acquired or a liability assumed in a business combination
that arises from a contingency cannot be determined during the measurement period, an asset or
liability shall be recognized if it is probable that an asset existed or that a liability had been
incurred at the acquisition date and the amount of the asset or liability can be reasonably
estimated. An acquirer shall develop a rational basis for subsequently measuring and accounting
for assets and liabilities arising from contingencies depending on their nature. This accounting
guidance is effective for assets or liabilities arising from contingencies in business combinations
for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period
beginning on or after December 15, 2008. The Company applied the guidance in accounting for the
aforementioned Provident and Bradford transactions completed during the 2009 second and third quarters, respectively. Information concerning the Provident and Bradford
acquisitions is included in note 2 of Notes to Financial Statements.
In December 2008, the FASB issued guidance on an employers disclosures about plan assets of a
defined benefit pension or other postretirement plan. The accounting guidance requires an employer
to disclose information about how investment allocation decisions are made, including factors that
are pertinent to an understanding of investment policies and strategies. An employer will also need
to disclose separately for pension plans and other postretirement benefit plans the fair value of
each major category of plan assets as of each annual reporting date for which a statement of
financial position is presented. The guidance also requires the disclosure of information that
enables financial statement users to assess the inputs and valuation techniques used to develop
fair value measurements of plan assets at the annual reporting date. For fair value measurements
using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3), an employer will be required to disclose the
effect of the measurements on changes in plan assets for the period. Furthermore, an employer is
required to provide financial statement users with an understanding of significant concentrations
of risk in plan assets. The guidance should be applied for fiscal years ending after December 15,
2009. Upon initial application, the disclosures are not required for earlier periods that are
presented for comparative purposes. The Company intends to comply with the disclosure requirements
when they become effective.
- 87 -
Forward-Looking Statements
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and other
sections of this quarterly report contain forward-looking statements that are based on current
expectations, estimates and projections about the Companys business, managements beliefs and
assumptions made by management. These statements are not guarantees of future performance and
involve certain risks, uncertainties and assumptions (Future Factors) which are difficult to
predict. Therefore, actual outcomes and results may differ materially from what is expressed or
forecasted in such forward-looking statements.
Future Factors include changes in interest rates, spreads on earning assets and
interest-bearing liabilities, and interest rate sensitivity; prepayment speeds, loan originations,
credit losses and market values on loans, collateral securing loans and other assets; sources of
liquidity; common shares outstanding; common stock price volatility; fair value of and number of
stock-based compensation awards to be issued in future periods; legislation affecting the financial
services industry as a whole, and M&T and its subsidiaries individually or collectively, including
tax legislation; regulatory supervision and oversight, including monetary policy and required
capital levels; changes in accounting policies or procedures as may be required by the FASB or
other regulatory agencies; increasing price and product/service competition by competitors,
including new entrants; rapid technological developments and changes; the ability to continue to
introduce competitive new products and services on a timely, cost-effective basis; the mix of
products/services; containing costs and expenses; governmental and public policy changes;
protection and validity of intellectual property rights; reliance on large customers;
technological, implementation and cost/financial risks in large, multi-year contracts; the outcome
of pending and future litigation and governmental proceedings, including tax-related examinations
and other matters; continued availability of financing; financial resources in the amounts, at the
times and on the terms required to support M&T and its subsidiaries future businesses; and
material differences in the actual financial results of merger, acquisition and investment
activities compared with M&Ts initial expectations, including the full realization of anticipated
cost savings and revenue enhancements.
These are representative of the Future Factors that could affect the outcome of the
forward-looking statements. In addition, such statements could be affected by general industry and
market conditions and growth rates, general economic and political conditions, either nationally or
in the states in which M&T and its subsidiaries do business, including interest rate and currency
exchange rate fluctuations, changes and trends in the securities markets, and other Future Factors.
- 88 -
M&T BANK CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Table 1
QUARTERLY TRENDS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 Quarters |
|
2008 Quarters |
|
|
Third |
|
Second |
|
First |
|
Fourth |
|
Third |
|
Second |
|
First |
Earnings and dividends |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts in thousands, except per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income (taxable-equivalent basis) |
|
$ |
706,388 |
|
|
|
682,637 |
|
|
|
659,445 |
|
|
|
779,468 |
|
|
|
806,614 |
|
|
|
823,425 |
|
|
|
889,945 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
152,938 |
|
|
|
175,856 |
|
|
|
206,705 |
|
|
|
288,426 |
|
|
|
313,115 |
|
|
|
330,942 |
|
|
|
405,312 |
|
|
Net interest income |
|
|
553,450 |
|
|
|
506,781 |
|
|
|
452,740 |
|
|
|
491,042 |
|
|
|
493,499 |
|
|
|
492,483 |
|
|
|
484,633 |
|
Less: provision for credit losses |
|
|
154,000 |
|
|
|
147,000 |
|
|
|
158,000 |
|
|
|
151,000 |
|
|
|
101,000 |
|
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
60,000 |
|
Other income |
|
|
278,226 |
|
|
|
271,649 |
|
|
|
232,341 |
|
|
|
241,417 |
|
|
|
113,717 |
|
|
|
271,182 |
|
|
|
312,663 |
|
Less: other expense |
|
|
500,056 |
|
|
|
563,710 |
|
|
|
438,346 |
|
|
|
446,819 |
|
|
|
434,763 |
|
|
|
419,710 |
|
|
|
425,704 |
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
177,620 |
|
|
|
67,720 |
|
|
|
88,735 |
|
|
|
134,640 |
|
|
|
71,453 |
|
|
|
243,955 |
|
|
|
311,592 |
|
Applicable income taxes (benefit) |
|
|
44,161 |
|
|
|
11,318 |
|
|
|
19,581 |
|
|
|
27,432 |
|
|
|
(24,992 |
) |
|
|
77,839 |
|
|
|
103,613 |
|
Taxable-equivalent adjustment |
|
|
5,795 |
|
|
|
5,214 |
|
|
|
4,933 |
|
|
|
4,967 |
|
|
|
5,260 |
|
|
|
5,851 |
|
|
|
5,783 |
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
127,664 |
|
|
|
51,188 |
|
|
|
64,221 |
|
|
|
102,241 |
|
|
|
91,185 |
|
|
|
160,265 |
|
|
|
202,196 |
|
|
Net income available to common shareholders |
|
$ |
113,894 |
|
|
|
40,516 |
|
|
|
54,618 |
|
|
|
101,451 |
|
|
|
91,185 |
|
|
|
160,265 |
|
|
|
202,196 |
|
Per common share data |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings |
|
$ |
.97 |
|
|
|
.36 |
|
|
|
.49 |
|
|
|
.92 |
|
|
|
.83 |
|
|
|
1.45 |
|
|
|
1.84 |
|
Diluted earnings |
|
|
.97 |
|
|
|
.36 |
|
|
|
.49 |
|
|
|
.92 |
|
|
|
.82 |
|
|
|
1.44 |
|
|
|
1.82 |
|
Cash dividends |
|
$ |
.70 |
|
|
|
.70 |
|
|
|
.70 |
|
|
|
.70 |
|
|
|
.70 |
|
|
|
.70 |
|
|
|
.70 |
|
Average common shares outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
117,370 |
|
|
|
113,218 |
|
|
|
110,439 |
|
|
|
110,370 |
|
|
|
110,265 |
|
|
|
110,191 |
|
|
|
110,017 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
117,547 |
|
|
|
113,521 |
|
|
|
110,439 |
|
|
|
110,620 |
|
|
|
110,807 |
|
|
|
111,227 |
|
|
|
110,967 |
|
|
Performance ratios, annualized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average assets |
|
|
.73 |
% |
|
|
.31 |
% |
|
|
.40 |
% |
|
|
.63 |
% |
|
|
.56 |
% |
|
|
.98 |
% |
|
|
1.25 |
% |
Average common stockholders equity |
|
|
6.72 |
% |
|
|
2.53 |
% |
|
|
3.61 |
% |
|
|
6.41 |
% |
|
|
5.66 |
% |
|
|
9.96 |
% |
|
|
12.49 |
% |
Net interest margin on average earning assets
(taxable-equivalent basis) |
|
|
3.61 |
% |
|
|
3.43 |
% |
|
|
3.19 |
% |
|
|
3.37 |
% |
|
|
3.39 |
% |
|
|
3.39 |
% |
|
|
3.38 |
% |
Nonaccrual loans to total loans and leases,
net of unearned discount |
|
|
2.35 |
% |
|
|
2.11 |
% |
|
|
2.05 |
% |
|
|
1.54 |
% |
|
|
1.41 |
% |
|
|
1.16 |
% |
|
|
.97 |
% |
Efficiency ratio (a) |
|
|
57.21 |
% |
|
|
61.93 |
% |
|
|
60.82 |
% |
|
|
59.11 |
% |
|
|
57.24 |
% |
|
|
54.57 |
% |
|
|
55.27 |
% |
|
Net operating (tangible) results (b) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating income (in thousands) |
|
$ |
128,761 |
|
|
|
100,805 |
|
|
|
75,034 |
|
|
|
111,784 |
|
|
|
100,809 |
|
|
|
170,361 |
|
|
|
215,597 |
|
Diluted net operating income per common share |
|
|
.98 |
|
|
|
.79 |
|
|
|
.59 |
|
|
|
1.00 |
|
|
|
.91 |
|
|
|
1.53 |
|
|
|
1.94 |
|
Annualized return on |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average tangible assets |
|
|
.78 |
% |
|
|
.64 |
% |
|
|
.50 |
% |
|
|
.72 |
% |
|
|
.65 |
% |
|
|
1.10 |
% |
|
|
1.41 |
% |
Average tangible common stockholders equity |
|
|
14.87 |
% |
|
|
12.08 |
% |
|
|
9.36 |
% |
|
|
15.01 |
% |
|
|
13.17 |
% |
|
|
22.20 |
% |
|
|
27.86 |
% |
Efficiency ratio (a) |
|
|
55.21 |
% |
|
|
60.03 |
% |
|
|
58.68 |
% |
|
|
57.03 |
% |
|
|
55.16 |
% |
|
|
52.41 |
% |
|
|
52.85 |
% |
|
Balance sheet data |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In millions, except per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average balances |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets (c) |
|
$ |
69,154 |
|
|
|
66,984 |
|
|
|
64,766 |
|
|
|
64,942 |
|
|
|
64,997 |
|
|
|
65,584 |
|
|
|
65,015 |
|
Total tangible assets (c) |
|
|
65,462 |
|
|
|
63,500 |
|
|
|
61,420 |
|
|
|
61,584 |
|
|
|
61,627 |
|
|
|
62,201 |
|
|
|
61,614 |
|
Earning assets |
|
|
60,900 |
|
|
|
59,297 |
|
|
|
57,509 |
|
|
|
57,919 |
|
|
|
57,971 |
|
|
|
58,465 |
|
|
|
57,713 |
|
Investment securities |
|
|
8,420 |
|
|
|
8,508 |
|
|
|
8,490 |
|
|
|
8,894 |
|
|
|
9,303 |
|
|
|
8,770 |
|
|
|
8,924 |
|
Loans and leases, net of unearned discount |
|
|
52,320 |
|
|
|
50,554 |
|
|
|
48,824 |
|
|
|
48,810 |
|
|
|
48,477 |
|
|
|
49,522 |
|
|
|
48,575 |
|
Deposits |
|
|
46,720 |
|
|
|
43,846 |
|
|
|
41,487 |
|
|
|
40,447 |
|
|
|
39,503 |
|
|
|
39,711 |
|
|
|
39,999 |
|
Common stockholders equity (c) |
|
|
6,794 |
|
|
|
6,491 |
|
|
|
6,212 |
|
|
|
6,299 |
|
|
|
6,415 |
|
|
|
6,469 |
|
|
|
6,513 |
|
Tangible common stockholders equity (c) |
|
|
3,102 |
|
|
|
3,007 |
|
|
|
2,866 |
|
|
|
2,941 |
|
|
|
3,045 |
|
|
|
3,086 |
|
|
|
3,112 |
|
|
At end of quarter |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets (c) |
|
$ |
68,997 |
|
|
|
69,913 |
|
|
|
64,883 |
|
|
|
65,816 |
|
|
|
65,247 |
|
|
|
65,893 |
|
|
|
66,086 |
|
Total tangible assets (c) |
|
|
65,312 |
|
|
|
66,215 |
|
|
|
61,544 |
|
|
|
62,464 |
|
|
|
61,883 |
|
|
|
62,517 |
|
|
|
62,696 |
|
Earning assets |
|
|
59,993 |
|
|
|
61,044 |
|
|
|
56,823 |
|
|
|
57,107 |
|
|
|
57,430 |
|
|
|
57,949 |
|
|
|
58,030 |
|
Investment securities |
|
|
7,634 |
|
|
|
8,155 |
|
|
|
7,687 |
|
|
|
7,919 |
|
|
|
8,433 |
|
|
|
8,659 |
|
|
|
8,676 |
|
Loans and leases, net of unearned discount |
|
|
52,204 |
|
|
|
52,715 |
|
|
|
48,918 |
|
|
|
49,000 |
|
|
|
48,694 |
|
|
|
49,115 |
|
|
|
49,279 |
|
Deposits |
|
|
46,862 |
|
|
|
46,755 |
|
|
|
42,477 |
|
|
|
42,581 |
|
|
|
42,501 |
|
|
|
41,926 |
|
|
|
41,533 |
|
Common stockholders equity (c) |
|
|
6,879 |
|
|
|
6,669 |
|
|
|
6,329 |
|
|
|
6,217 |
|
|
|
6,417 |
|
|
|
6,519 |
|
|
|
6,488 |
|
Tangible common stockholders equity (c) |
|
|
3,194 |
|
|
|
2,971 |
|
|
|
2,990 |
|
|
|
2,865 |
|
|
|
3,053 |
|
|
|
3,143 |
|
|
|
3,098 |
|
Equity per common share |
|
|
58.22 |
|
|
|
56.51 |
|
|
|
56.95 |
|
|
|
56.29 |
|
|
|
58.17 |
|
|
|
59.12 |
|
|
|
58.92 |
|
Tangible equity per common share |
|
|
27.03 |
|
|
|
25.17 |
|
|
|
26.90 |
|
|
|
25.94 |
|
|
|
27.67 |
|
|
|
28.50 |
|
|
|
28.14 |
|
|
Market price per common share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High |
|
$ |
67.46 |
|
|
|
61.87 |
|
|
|
59.08 |
|
|
|
99.50 |
|
|
|
108.53 |
|
|
|
98.38 |
|
|
|
94.03 |
|
Low |
|
|
50.33 |
|
|
|
43.50 |
|
|
|
29.11 |
|
|
|
52.20 |
|
|
|
53.61 |
|
|
|
69.90 |
|
|
|
70.49 |
|
Closing |
|
|
62.32 |
|
|
|
50.93 |
|
|
|
45.24 |
|
|
|
57.41 |
|
|
|
89.25 |
|
|
|
70.54 |
|
|
|
80.48 |
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Excludes impact of merger-related gains and expenses and net securities transactions. |
|
(b) |
|
Excludes amortization and balances related to goodwill and core deposit and other intangible
assets and merger-related gains and expenses which, except in the calculation of the efficiency
ratio, are net of applicable income tax effects. A reconciliation of net income and net operating
income appears in table 2. |
|
(c) |
|
The difference between total assets and total tangible assets, and common stockholders equity
and tangible common stockholders equity, represents goodwill, core deposit and other intangible
assets, net of applicable deferred tax balances. A reconciliation of such balances appears in
table 2. |
- 89 -
M&T BANK CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Table 2
RECONCILIATION OF QUARTERLY GAAP TO NON-GAAP MEASURES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 Quarters |
|
2008 Quarters |
|
|
Third |
|
Second |
|
First |
|
Fourth |
|
Third |
|
Second |
|
First |
Income statement data |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In thousands, except per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
127,664 |
|
|
|
51,188 |
|
|
|
64,221 |
|
|
|
102,241 |
|
|
|
91,185 |
|
|
|
160,265 |
|
|
|
202,196 |
|
Amortization of core deposit and other
intangible assets (a) |
|
|
10,270 |
|
|
|
9,247 |
|
|
|
9,337 |
|
|
|
9,543 |
|
|
|
9,624 |
|
|
|
10,096 |
|
|
|
11,241 |
|
Merger-related gain (a) |
|
|
(17,684 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Merger-related expenses (a) |
|
|
8,511 |
|
|
|
40,370 |
|
|
|
1,476 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,160 |
|
|
Net operating income |
|
$ |
128,761 |
|
|
|
100,805 |
|
|
|
75,034 |
|
|
|
111,784 |
|
|
|
100,809 |
|
|
|
170,361 |
|
|
|
215,597 |
|
|
Earnings per common share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per common share |
|
$ |
.97 |
|
|
|
.36 |
|
|
|
.49 |
|
|
|
.92 |
|
|
|
.82 |
|
|
|
1.44 |
|
|
|
1.82 |
|
Amortization of core deposit and other
intangible assets (a) |
|
|
.09 |
|
|
|
.08 |
|
|
|
.09 |
|
|
|
.08 |
|
|
|
.09 |
|
|
|
.09 |
|
|
|
.10 |
|
Merger-related gain (a) |
|
|
(.15 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Merger-related expenses (a) |
|
|
.07 |
|
|
|
.35 |
|
|
|
.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.02 |
|
|
Diluted net operating earnings per common share |
|
$ |
.98 |
|
|
|
.79 |
|
|
|
.59 |
|
|
|
1.00 |
|
|
|
.91 |
|
|
|
1.53 |
|
|
|
1.94 |
|
|
Other expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other expense |
|
$ |
500,056 |
|
|
|
563,710 |
|
|
|
438,346 |
|
|
|
446,819 |
|
|
|
434,763 |
|
|
|
419,710 |
|
|
|
425,704 |
|
Amortization of core deposit and other
intangible assets |
|
|
(16,924 |
) |
|
|
(15,231 |
) |
|
|
(15,370 |
) |
|
|
(15,708 |
) |
|
|
(15,840 |
) |
|
|
(16,615 |
) |
|
|
(18,483 |
) |
Merger-related expenses |
|
|
(14,010 |
) |
|
|
(66,457 |
) |
|
|
(2,426 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,547 |
) |
|
Noninterest operating expense |
|
$ |
469,122 |
|
|
|
482,022 |
|
|
|
420,550 |
|
|
|
431,111 |
|
|
|
418,923 |
|
|
|
403,095 |
|
|
|
403,674 |
|
|
Merger-related expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries and employee benefits |
|
$ |
870 |
|
|
|
8,768 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
62 |
|
Equipment and net occupancy |
|
|
1,845 |
|
|
|
581 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49 |
|
Printing, postage and supplies |
|
|
629 |
|
|
|
2,514 |
|
|
|
301 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
367 |
|
Other costs of operations |
|
|
10,666 |
|
|
|
54,594 |
|
|
|
2,110 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,069 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
14,010 |
|
|
|
66,457 |
|
|
|
2,426 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,547 |
|
|
Balance sheet data |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In millions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average assets |
|
$ |
69,154 |
|
|
|
66,984 |
|
|
|
64,766 |
|
|
|
64,942 |
|
|
|
64,997 |
|
|
|
65,584 |
|
|
|
65,015 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
(3,525 |
) |
|
|
(3,326 |
) |
|
|
(3,192 |
) |
|
|
(3,192 |
) |
|
|
(3,192 |
) |
|
|
(3,192 |
) |
|
|
(3,196 |
) |
Core deposit and other intangible assets |
|
|
(208 |
) |
|
|
(188 |
) |
|
|
(176 |
) |
|
|
(191 |
) |
|
|
(206 |
) |
|
|
(222 |
) |
|
|
(239 |
) |
Deferred taxes |
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
Average tangible assets |
|
$ |
65,462 |
|
|
|
63,500 |
|
|
|
61,420 |
|
|
|
61,584 |
|
|
|
61,627 |
|
|
|
62,201 |
|
|
|
61,614 |
|
|
Average common equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average total equity |
|
$ |
7,521 |
|
|
|
7,127 |
|
|
|
6,780 |
|
|
|
6,354 |
|
|
|
6,415 |
|
|
|
6,469 |
|
|
|
6,513 |
|
Preferred stock |
|
|
(727 |
) |
|
|
(636 |
) |
|
|
(568 |
) |
|
|
(55 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average common equity |
|
|
6,794 |
|
|
|
6,491 |
|
|
|
6,212 |
|
|
|
6,299 |
|
|
|
6,415 |
|
|
|
6,469 |
|
|
|
6,513 |
|
|
Goodwill |
|
|
(3,525 |
) |
|
|
(3,326 |
) |
|
|
(3,192 |
) |
|
|
(3,192 |
) |
|
|
(3,192 |
) |
|
|
(3,192 |
) |
|
|
(3,196 |
) |
Core deposit and other intangible assets |
|
|
(208 |
) |
|
|
(188 |
) |
|
|
(176 |
) |
|
|
(191 |
) |
|
|
(206 |
) |
|
|
(222 |
) |
|
|
(239 |
) |
|
Deferred taxes |
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
Average tangible common equity |
|
$ |
3,102 |
|
|
|
3,007 |
|
|
|
2,866 |
|
|
|
2,941 |
|
|
|
3,045 |
|
|
|
3,086 |
|
|
|
3,112 |
|
|
At end of quarter |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
68,997 |
|
|
|
69,913 |
|
|
|
64,883 |
|
|
|
65,816 |
|
|
|
65,247 |
|
|
|
65,893 |
|
|
|
66,086 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
(3,525 |
) |
|
|
(3,525 |
) |
|
|
(3,192 |
) |
|
|
(3,192 |
) |
|
|
(3,192 |
) |
|
|
(3,192 |
) |
|
|
(3,192 |
) |
Core deposit and other intangible assets |
|
|
(199 |
) |
|
|
(216 |
) |
|
|
(168 |
) |
|
|
(183 |
) |
|
|
(199 |
) |
|
|
(214 |
) |
|
|
(230 |
) |
Deferred taxes |
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
Total tangible assets |
|
$ |
65,312 |
|
|
|
66,215 |
|
|
|
61,544 |
|
|
|
62,464 |
|
|
|
61,883 |
|
|
|
62,517 |
|
|
|
62,696 |
|
|
Total common equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity |
|
$ |
7,612 |
|
|
|
7,400 |
|
|
|
6,902 |
|
|
|
6,785 |
|
|
|
6,417 |
|
|
|
6,519 |
|
|
|
6,488 |
|
Preferred stock |
|
|
(728 |
) |
|
|
(725 |
) |
|
|
(568 |
) |
|
|
(568 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unamortized discount and undeclared
dividends preferred stock |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total common equity |
|
|
6,879 |
|
|
|
6,669 |
|
|
|
6,329 |
|
|
|
6,217 |
|
|
|
6,417 |
|
|
|
6,519 |
|
|
|
6,488 |
|
|
Goodwill |
|
|
(3,525 |
) |
|
|
(3,525 |
) |
|
|
(3,192 |
) |
|
|
(3,192 |
) |
|
|
(3,192 |
) |
|
|
(3,192 |
) |
|
|
(3,192 |
) |
Core deposit and other intangible assets |
|
|
(199 |
) |
|
|
(216 |
) |
|
|
(168 |
) |
|
|
(183 |
) |
|
|
(199 |
) |
|
|
(214 |
) |
|
|
(230 |
) |
Deferred taxes |
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
Total tangible common equity |
|
$ |
3,194 |
|
|
|
2,971 |
|
|
|
2,990 |
|
|
|
2,865 |
|
|
|
3,053 |
|
|
|
3,143 |
|
|
|
3,098 |
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
After any related tax effect. |
- 90 -
M&T BANK CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Table 3
AVERAGE BALANCE SHEETS AND ANNUALIZED TAXABLE-EQUIVALENT RATES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 Third Quarter |
|
2009 Second Quarter |
|
2009 First Quarter |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
Average balance in millions; interest in thousands |
|
Balance |
|
Interest |
|
Rate |
|
Balance |
|
Interest |
|
Rate |
|
Balance |
|
Interest |
|
Rate |
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earning assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans and leases, net of unearned discount* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial, financial, etc. |
|
$ |
13,801 |
|
|
$ |
131,433 |
|
|
|
3.78 |
% |
|
|
14,067 |
|
|
|
131,886 |
|
|
|
3.76 |
% |
|
|
14,031 |
|
|
|
129,222 |
|
|
|
3.74 |
% |
Real estate commercial |
|
|
20,843 |
|
|
|
233,370 |
|
|
|
4.48 |
|
|
|
19,719 |
|
|
|
219,813 |
|
|
|
4.46 |
|
|
|
18,795 |
|
|
|
206,967 |
|
|
|
4.40 |
|
Real estate consumer |
|
|
5,429 |
|
|
|
73,752 |
|
|
|
5.43 |
|
|
|
5,262 |
|
|
|
71,079 |
|
|
|
5.40 |
|
|
|
5,033 |
|
|
|
70,353 |
|
|
|
5.59 |
|
Consumer |
|
|
12,247 |
|
|
|
165,665 |
|
|
|
5.37 |
|
|
|
11,506 |
|
|
|
155,609 |
|
|
|
5.42 |
|
|
|
10,965 |
|
|
|
151,968 |
|
|
|
5.62 |
|
|
Total loans and leases, net |
|
|
52,320 |
|
|
|
604,220 |
|
|
|
4.58 |
|
|
|
50,554 |
|
|
|
578,387 |
|
|
|
4.59 |
|
|
|
48,824 |
|
|
|
558,510 |
|
|
|
4.64 |
|
|
Interest-bearing deposits at banks |
|
|
66 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
.04 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
.05 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
.16 |
|
Federal funds sold and agreements
to resell securities |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
.58 |
|
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
.23 |
|
|
|
102 |
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
.23 |
|
Trading account |
|
|
83 |
|
|
|
169 |
|
|
|
.82 |
|
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
231 |
|
|
|
.77 |
|
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
123 |
|
|
|
.67 |
|
Investment securities** |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury and federal agencies |
|
|
3,803 |
|
|
|
45,216 |
|
|
|
4.72 |
|
|
|
3,806 |
|
|
|
46,353 |
|
|
|
4.88 |
|
|
|
3,727 |
|
|
|
45,610 |
|
|
|
4.96 |
|
Obligations of states and political subdivisions |
|
|
278 |
|
|
|
3,965 |
|
|
|
5.66 |
|
|
|
198 |
|
|
|
2,924 |
|
|
|
5.94 |
|
|
|
136 |
|
|
|
2,170 |
|
|
|
6.47 |
|
Other |
|
|
4,339 |
|
|
|
52,794 |
|
|
|
4.83 |
|
|
|
4,504 |
|
|
|
54,694 |
|
|
|
4.87 |
|
|
|
4,627 |
|
|
|
52,966 |
|
|
|
4.64 |
|
|
Total investment securities |
|
|
8,420 |
|
|
|
101,975 |
|
|
|
4.81 |
|
|
|
8,508 |
|
|
|
103,971 |
|
|
|
4.90 |
|
|
|
8,490 |
|
|
|
100,746 |
|
|
|
4.81 |
|
|
Total earning assets |
|
|
60,900 |
|
|
|
706,388 |
|
|
|
4.60 |
|
|
|
59,297 |
|
|
|
682,637 |
|
|
|
4.62 |
|
|
|
57,509 |
|
|
|
659,445 |
|
|
|
4.65 |
|
|
Allowance for credit losses |
|
|
(882 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(867 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(815 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks |
|
|
1,135 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,077 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,086 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets |
|
|
8,001 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,477 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,986 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
69,154 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66,984 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
64,766 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing deposits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOW accounts |
|
$ |
541 |
|
|
|
288 |
|
|
|
.21 |
|
|
|
515 |
|
|
|
246 |
|
|
|
.19 |
|
|
|
536 |
|
|
|
327 |
|
|
|
.25 |
|
Savings deposits |
|
|
23,367 |
|
|
|
22,076 |
|
|
|
.37 |
|
|
|
22,480 |
|
|
|
26,362 |
|
|
|
.47 |
|
|
|
21,203 |
|
|
|
41,922 |
|
|
|
.80 |
|
Time deposits |
|
|
9,246 |
|
|
|
50,678 |
|
|
|
2.17 |
|
|
|
8,858 |
|
|
|
55,697 |
|
|
|
2.52 |
|
|
|
8,720 |
|
|
|
60,329 |
|
|
|
2.81 |
|
Deposits at foreign office |
|
|
1,444 |
|
|
|
481 |
|
|
|
.13 |
|
|
|
1,460 |
|
|
|
576 |
|
|
|
.16 |
|
|
|
2,473 |
|
|
|
981 |
|
|
|
.16 |
|
|
Total interest-bearing deposits |
|
|
34,598 |
|
|
|
73,523 |
|
|
|
.84 |
|
|
|
33,313 |
|
|
|
82,881 |
|
|
|
1.00 |
|
|
|
32,932 |
|
|
|
103,559 |
|
|
|
1.28 |
|
|
Short-term borrowings |
|
|
2,663 |
|
|
|
1,764 |
|
|
|
.26 |
|
|
|
3,211 |
|
|
|
2,015 |
|
|
|
.25 |
|
|
|
3,477 |
|
|
|
2,348 |
|
|
|
.27 |
|
Long-term borrowings |
|
|
11,008 |
|
|
|
77,651 |
|
|
|
2.80 |
|
|
|
11,482 |
|
|
|
90,960 |
|
|
|
3.18 |
|
|
|
11,643 |
|
|
|
100,798 |
|
|
|
3.51 |
|
|
Total interest-bearing liabilities |
|
|
48,269 |
|
|
|
152,938 |
|
|
|
1.26 |
|
|
|
48,006 |
|
|
|
175,856 |
|
|
|
1.47 |
|
|
|
48,052 |
|
|
|
206,705 |
|
|
|
1.74 |
|
|
Noninterest-bearing deposits |
|
|
12,122 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,533 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,555 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
1,242 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,318 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,379 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
61,633 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59,857 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
57,986 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity |
|
|
7,521 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,127 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,780 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
69,154 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66,984 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
64,766 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest spread |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.91 |
|
Contribution of interest-free funds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.28 |
|
|
Net interest income/margin on earning assets |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
553,450 |
|
|
|
3.61 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
506,781 |
|
|
|
3.43 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
452,740 |
|
|
|
3.19 |
% |
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Includes nonaccrual loans. |
|
** |
|
Includes available for sale securities at amortized cost. |
(continued)
- 91 -
M&T BANK CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Table 3 (continued)
AVERAGE BALANCE SHEETS AND ANNUALIZED TAXABLE-EQUIVALENT RATES (continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 Fourth Quarter |
|
2008 Third Quarter |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
Average balance in millions; interest in thousands |
|
Balance |
|
Interest |
|
Rate |
|
Balance |
|
Interest |
|
Rate |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earning assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans and leases, net of unearned discount* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial, financial, etc. |
|
$ |
14,213 |
|
|
$ |
169,492 |
|
|
|
4.74 |
% |
|
|
13,882 |
|
|
|
177,497 |
|
|
|
5.09 |
% |
Real estate commercial |
|
|
18,666 |
|
|
|
259,145 |
|
|
|
5.55 |
|
|
|
18,557 |
|
|
|
260,879 |
|
|
|
5.62 |
|
Real estate consumer |
|
|
4,904 |
|
|
|
71,778 |
|
|
|
5.85 |
|
|
|
4,964 |
|
|
|
74,582 |
|
|
|
6.01 |
|
Consumer |
|
|
11,027 |
|
|
|
168,584 |
|
|
|
6.08 |
|
|
|
11,074 |
|
|
|
175,558 |
|
|
|
6.31 |
|
|
Total loans and leases, net |
|
|
48,810 |
|
|
|
668,999 |
|
|
|
5.45 |
|
|
|
48,477 |
|
|
|
688,516 |
|
|
|
5.65 |
|
|
Interest-bearing deposits at banks |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
.55 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
1.09 |
|
Federal funds sold and agreements
to resell securities |
|
|
103 |
|
|
|
108 |
|
|
|
.41 |
|
|
|
102 |
|
|
|
515 |
|
|
|
2.01 |
|
Trading account |
|
|
99 |
|
|
|
785 |
|
|
|
3.16 |
|
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
359 |
|
|
|
1.81 |
|
Investment securities** |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury and federal agencies |
|
|
3,901 |
|
|
|
48,260 |
|
|
|
4.92 |
|
|
|
4,067 |
|
|
|
50,085 |
|
|
|
4.90 |
|
Obligations of states and political subdivisions |
|
|
127 |
|
|
|
2,161 |
|
|
|
6.76 |
|
|
|
129 |
|
|
|
2,191 |
|
|
|
6.79 |
|
Other |
|
|
4,866 |
|
|
|
59,137 |
|
|
|
4.84 |
|
|
|
5,107 |
|
|
|
64,923 |
|
|
|
5.06 |
|
|
Total investment securities |
|
|
8,894 |
|
|
|
109,558 |
|
|
|
4.90 |
|
|
|
9,303 |
|
|
|
117,199 |
|
|
|
5.01 |
|
|
Total earning assets |
|
|
57,919 |
|
|
|
779,468 |
|
|
|
5.35 |
|
|
|
57,971 |
|
|
|
806,614 |
|
|
|
5.54 |
|
|
Allowance for credit losses |
|
|
(806 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(790 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks |
|
|
1,156 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,236 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets |
|
|
6,673 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,580 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
64,942 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
64,997 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing deposits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOW accounts |
|
$ |
528 |
|
|
|
592 |
|
|
|
.45 |
|
|
|
484 |
|
|
|
655 |
|
|
|
.54 |
|
Savings deposits |
|
|
19,540 |
|
|
|
62,227 |
|
|
|
1.27 |
|
|
|
18,191 |
|
|
|
58,917 |
|
|
|
1.29 |
|
Time deposits |
|
|
9,388 |
|
|
|
72,179 |
|
|
|
3.06 |
|
|
|
9,318 |
|
|
|
72,100 |
|
|
|
3.08 |
|
Deposits at foreign office |
|
|
2,985 |
|
|
|
5,326 |
|
|
|
.71 |
|
|
|
3,837 |
|
|
|
18,709 |
|
|
|
1.94 |
|
|
Total interest-bearing deposits |
|
|
32,441 |
|
|
|
140,324 |
|
|
|
1.72 |
|
|
|
31,830 |
|
|
|
150,381 |
|
|
|
1.88 |
|
|
Short-term borrowings |
|
|
4,950 |
|
|
|
10,239 |
|
|
|
.82 |
|
|
|
5,392 |
|
|
|
28,155 |
|
|
|
2.08 |
|
Long-term borrowings |
|
|
12,058 |
|
|
|
137,863 |
|
|
|
4.55 |
|
|
|
12,666 |
|
|
|
134,579 |
|
|
|
4.23 |
|
|
Total interest-bearing liabilities |
|
|
49,449 |
|
|
|
288,426 |
|
|
|
2.32 |
|
|
|
49,888 |
|
|
|
313,115 |
|
|
|
2.50 |
|
|
Noninterest-bearing deposits |
|
|
8,006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,673 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
1,133 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,021 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
58,588 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58,582 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity |
|
|
6,354 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,415 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
64,942 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
64,997 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest spread |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.03 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.04 |
|
Contribution of interest-free funds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.35 |
|
|
Net interest income/margin on earning assets |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
491,042 |
|
|
|
3.37 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
493,499 |
|
|
|
3.39 |
% |
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Includes nonaccrual loans. |
|
** |
|
Includes available for sale securities at amortized cost. |
- 92 -
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
Incorporated by reference to the discussion contained under the caption Taxable-equivalent
Net Interest Income in Part I, Item 2, Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures.
(a) Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures. Based upon their evaluation of the
effectiveness of M&Ts disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)), Robert G. Wilmers, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, and
René F. Jones, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, concluded that M&Ts
disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of September 30, 2009.
(b) Changes in internal control over financial reporting. M&T regularly assesses the adequacy
of its internal control over financial reporting and enhances its controls in response to internal
control assessments and internal and external audit and regulatory recommendations. No changes in
internal control over financial reporting have been identified in connection with the evaluation of
disclosure controls and procedures during the quarter ended September 30, 2009 that have materially
affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, M&Ts internal control over financial
reporting.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings.
M&T and its subsidiaries are subject in the normal course of business to various pending and
threatened legal proceedings in which claims for monetary damages are asserted. Management, after
consultation with legal counsel, does not anticipate that the aggregate ultimate liability arising
out of litigation pending against M&T or its subsidiaries will be material to M&Ts consolidated
financial position, but at the present time is not in a position to determine whether such
litigation will have a material adverse effect on M&Ts consolidated results of operations in any
future reporting period.
Item 1A. Risk Factors.
There have been no material changes in risk factors relating to M&T to those disclosed in
response to Item 1A. to Part I of Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.
- 93 -
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.
(a)(b) Not applicable.
(c)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(d)Maximum |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(c)Total |
|
|
Number (or |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Approximate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Dollar Value) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(or Units) |
|
|
of Shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchased |
|
|
(or Units) |
|
|
|
(a)Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
as Part of |
|
|
that may yet |
|
|
|
Number |
|
|
(b)Average |
|
|
Publicly |
|
|
be Purchased |
|
|
|
of Shares |
|
|
Price Paid |
|
|
Announced |
|
|
Under the |
|
|
|
(or Units) |
|
|
per Share |
|
|
Plans or |
|
|
Plans or |
|
Period |
|
Purchased(1) |
|
|
(or Unit) |
|
|
Programs |
|
|
Programs (2) |
|
|
July 1
July 31, 2009 |
|
|
14,925 |
|
|
$ |
57.63 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,181,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
August 1
August 31, 2009 |
|
|
3,306 |
|
|
|
60.44 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,181,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 1
September 30, 2009 |
|
|
261 |
|
|
|
61.65 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,181,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
18,492 |
|
|
$ |
58.19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The total number of shares purchased during the periods indicated includes shares deemed
to have been received from employees who exercised stock options by attesting to previously
acquired common shares in satisfaction of the exercise price, as is permitted under M&Ts
stock option plans. |
|
(2) |
|
On February 22, 2007, M&T announced a program to purchase up to 5,000,000 shares of its
common stock. No shares were purchased under such program during the periods indicated. |
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities.
(Not applicable.)
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.
(None.)
Item 5. Other Information.
(None.)
- 94 -
Item 6. Exhibits.
The following exhibits are filed as a part of this report.
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
No. |
|
|
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer under Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Filed herewith. |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer under Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Filed herewith. |
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer under 18 U.S.C. §1350 pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Filed herewith. |
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer under 18 U.S.C.
§1350 pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002. Filed
herewith. |
|
|
|
101.INS*
|
|
XBRL Instance Document. |
|
|
|
101.SCH*
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema. |
|
|
|
101.CAL*
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase. |
|
|
|
101.LAB*
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase. |
|
|
|
101.PRE*
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase. |
|
|
|
101.DEF*
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Definition Linkbase. |
|
|
|
* |
|
As provided in Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, this information is furnished and
not filed for purposes of Sections 11 and 12 of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section
18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. |
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
M&T BANK CORPORATION
|
|
Date: November 4, 2009 |
By: |
/s/ René F. Jones
|
|
|
|
René F. Jones |
|
|
|
Executive Vice President
and Chief Financial Officer |
|
- 95 -
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
No. |
|
|
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer under Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002. Filed herewith. |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer under Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002. Filed herewith. |
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer under 18 U.S.C. §1350 pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Filed herewith. |
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer under 18 U.S.C. §1350 pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Filed herewith. |
|
|
|
101.INS*
|
|
XBRL Instance Document. |
|
|
|
101.SCH*
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema. |
|
|
|
101.CAL*
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase. |
|
|
|
101.LAB*
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase. |
|
|
|
101.PRE*
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase. |
|
|
|
101.DEF*
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Definition Linkbase. |
|
|
|
* |
|
As provided in Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, this information is furnished and not filed for
purposes of Sections 11 and 12 of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 18 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934. |
- 96 -
exv31w1
EXHIBIT 31.1
CERTIFICATIONS
I, Robert G. Wilmers, certify that:
1. |
|
I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of M&T Bank Corporation; |
|
2. |
|
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report; |
|
3. |
|
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report; |
|
4. |
|
The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: |
|
a) |
|
designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating
to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; |
|
b) |
|
designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over
financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance
regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements
for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; |
|
c) |
|
evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
and |
|
d) |
|
disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial
reporting. |
|
5. |
|
The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions): |
|
a) |
|
all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal
control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and |
|
b) |
|
any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting. |
Date: November 4, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ Robert G. Wilmers
Robert G. Wilmers
|
|
|
|
|
Chairman of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
exv31w2
EXHIBIT 31.2
CERTIFICATIONS
I, René F. Jones, certify that:
1. |
|
I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of M&T Bank Corporation; |
|
2. |
|
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report; |
|
3. |
|
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report; |
|
4. |
|
The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: |
|
a) |
|
designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating
to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; |
|
b) |
|
designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over
financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance
regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements
for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; |
|
c) |
|
evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
and |
|
d) |
|
disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial
reporting. |
|
5. |
|
The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions): |
|
a) |
|
all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal
control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and |
|
b) |
|
any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting. |
Date: November 4, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ René F. Jones
René F. Jones
|
|
|
|
|
Executive Vice President
and Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
exv32w1
EXHIBIT 32.1
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER UNDER 18 U.S.C. §1350
I, Robert G. Wilmers, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of M&T Bank Corporation,
certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:
|
(1) |
|
the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of M&T Bank Corporation for the quarterly period ended
September 30, 2009 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and |
|
|
(2) |
|
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
M&T Bank Corporation. |
The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 and is not being
filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
|
|
|
/s/ Robert G. Wilmers
Robert G. Wilmers
|
|
|
November 4, 2009 |
|
|
A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form
within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided
to M&T Bank Corporation and will be retained by M&T Bank Corporation and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
exv32w2
EXHIBIT 32.2
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER UNDER 18 U.S.C. §1350
I, René F. Jones, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of M&T Bank Corporation,
certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:
|
(1) |
|
the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of M&T Bank Corporation for the quarterly period ended
September 30, 2009 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and |
|
|
(2) |
|
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
M&T Bank Corporation. |
The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 and is not being
filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
|
|
|
/s/ René F. Jones
René F. Jones
November 4, 2009
|
|
|
A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form
within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided
to M&T Bank Corporation and will be retained by M&T Bank Corporation and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.